#Rife Machine Reviews

[shewholovestoread]

Mission Impossible 7: Dead Reckoning Impressions

I’ve been a fan of the Mission Impossible franchise, especially fourth film onwards. This is not a review per se, it’s more a list of what was okay in the film, what was great and what was downright awful. So let’s get into it.

SPOILERS AHEAD!!!

THE MEH:

- The villain - on the surface, having an AI entity called The Entity sounds like a good idea. Especially given the current climate, the discourse surrounding AI and the way it’s being used. The problem is that, it lacks the human component that makes a villain engaging. One of the most fascinating aspects of a villain done right is their motivation and their drive. Aspects that perhaps the audience can relate to. All of that is missing with a digital villain.

- Gabriel - Again, the fact that he’s following orders from an AI just seems dumb and takes away from his being an engaging villain in his own right. Yes, he’s menacing and clearly dangerous but all of that is undercut because he’s not the big bad, a machine is. His history with Ethan is rife with untapped potential and I hope that the eighth film digs deeper into that.

- Alana Mitsopolis - So much potential and she does next to nothing in the film.

Also, this was mind-boggling, when Grace is pretending to be Alana, her eye colour is so obviously different from the real Alana that I’m kinda shocked that the brother didn’t pick that up. It was so glaring that it immediately took me out of the film. It made no sense.

THE GOOD:

- Paris - Pom Klementieff stole the show. She was so good and I’m so excited to see her in the next installment. Also, the scene of her chasing Ethan and Grace in the huge-ass military truck... pure chef’s kiss. You know that scene in the animated 101 Dalmations when Cruella is driving her car like a lunatic, Paris had that energy down pat.

- Grace - I liked her character though there are some problems that I’ll get to later. But well written and another character who doesn’t immediately fall head over heels in love with Ethan. I liked that she was smart and didn’t trust people just because they asked her to. She had reason to be wary and I appreciated that.

- The stunts - This is a given. The stunts get bigger and more outrageous with every progressing Mission Impossible film and this one was no different. The bike-jumping-off-the-cliff is the one that they’ve pushed the most in their marketing, but there’s one more near the end that’s probably way more stressful.

THE BAD:

- The stunts - The stunts in the film overpowered the plot. There is such a thing as 'too much of a good thing’ and the stunts in this film definitely fall into that category. There was something new happening every few scenes and some of the stunts scenes also just went on for a little too long.

- The Death of Ilsa Faust - This one just drove me mad with rage. She is canonically as good as Ethan, his equal in every way and was set-up as a foil to him, often a little more ruthless than him and willing to make tough decisions even if that meant going against Ethan and his team, people she clearly cares about.

It’s not just that she died, but the way she died. She gets stabbed by Gabriel and actually died alone, by the time Ethan finds her, she’s already gone. She died alone on a fucking bridge and that’s just a damn shame.

To add insult to injury, the way they’ve set-up Grace as an immediate replacement for Ilsa, to the extent that in the very next scene, she’s part of the team as if she had always been there. It’s like the film is telling you that female characters are of little consequence and replaceable. This was also so damn blatant that yet again, it pulled me out of the film. I couldn’t believe that it was handled in such ham-handed way. It also made me dislike Grace on principle.

Her death also stings because Benji and Luther were right there and they’ve been there since the third (fourth?) film and are still alive and kicking. If we were meant to have a meaningful loss for Ethan, why couldn’t it either of the 2 dudes? Also, it is possible to have more than 1 woman on the team. There’s no rule that states that the addition of the new female character must be facilitated by the death of the previous woman on the team. There are SOOOO many films guilty of this (looking at you Pacific Rim 2, which killed off Mako Mori and then replaced her with Liwen Shao)

THE THING THAT GIVES ME PAUSE:

The only thing that gives me pause is the way Ilsa’s death was handled. It’s so badly done that it almost feels like a different film. My theory is that Ilsa is actually alive and will return in the next film. The whole thing was badly handled on purpose.

Now hear me out, early on in the film, Ethan and Ilsa fake her death to get the American intelligence agencies off her back. From the way it’s shot, it’s immediately apparent that she’s not dead. And they reveal very quickly that she’s still alive.

When she reunites with the team, the whole lot of them get into an argument about acceptable losses and that the mission is more important than any member of the team (very subtle-R-us) and then to no one’s surprise, it is Ilsa who goes and talks to Ethan and they have a very awkward hug. Ilsa and Ethan’s romance, thus far, was played with great subtlety. they’re not very touchy-feely with each other. They show their love in how far they’re willing to go for each other. It’s the sexual tension that is the real draw for these two. It’s a strange kind of intimacy which is very different from all of his previous romantic partners.

So we got that awkward scene and by then it is glaringly obvious who’s gonna die. Ilsa has a sword fight with Gabriel, she gets stabbed and then dies. But here’s the thing, every thing I said earlier about how it was handled just doesn’t feel right. McQuarrie is a better writer and director and I expect him do better because he has consistently done better in the last two films.

We are constantly told that The Entity can already see ALL of the possible approaches that Ethan can think of. It can see 10 steps ahead of everyone on the team. So how do you beat a machine that has already seen all of your upcoming moves and put in counter-attacks? You do something it can’t predict. If both Gabriel, Grace and pretty much everyone concerned thinks Ilsa is dead, it gives her the perfect opportunity to blindside The Entity. She’s the piece of the puzzle that The Entity can’t see coming.

Repetition: Gabriel already killed Ethan’s past love interest, it is so damn lazy of the filmmakers to make him kill the current love interest (although Ilsa is so much more than a mere love interest) Not to mention, Gabriel stabs Paris in almost the exact same place as he did Ilsa and she managed to live and even saved Ethan and Grace’s lives.

If however, this is the end of the road for Ilsa Faust, it was a damn shame for such an amazing character to get such an anti-climactic end. It was a disappointing end for a character that had very quickly become one of the best parts of the series.

[incorrecttowerofgodquotes]

Gundam Witch From Mercury Season 2 Episode 7 Review

- I’d like to get off of Prospera Mercury’s wild ride

- Miorine is finally going to Earth, not to escape her life rife with politics, but instead to try and bolster her image. Meanwhile Guel seems pensive to go back. His small time on Earth changed him into a new man, one that doesn’t have a home in either space or on earth. Meanwhile Kenanji, a professional, has no outwardly displayed anxieties and instead just cracks a joke. He’s been immersed in the dark underbelly of Spacian and Earthian conflict so he’s used to the large pressure everyone’s under

- Martin became Secelia’s water boy and I love it. Okouchi got Quentin Tarantino and Dan Schneider in the writing room for that scene. But for as abrasive as she is, Secelia gives some good advice. Martin can’t spend forever wallowing I’m his guilt. He needs to be upfront with his feelings and accept that sometimes, you just gotta do something, even if it hurts

- Guel recognizing Sedo and chasing after him, leaving Miorine to fend for herself was a dumb move, but a realistic one. He wants to reconnect with a proper relationship this time. Plus, it seems like Guel just has a soft spot for kids in general. However, him chasing after Sedo gave him an important piece of information. That Shaddiq was the one ordered the terrorist attacks that got his dad killed, and boy is Guel pissed. I want to see him 5 v 1 Shaddiq’s squad (Renee and Felsi can fight it out alone) and gain his position as the best pilot in the WFM verse

- Speaking of Shaddiq, this man is the biggest fucking “nice guy” I’ve ever seen. He doesn’t even see Miorine as a human, just a perfect porcelain doll that needs saving. Nothing can be her fault, it must be everyone else’s. Which is even bigger cap because he was the one who let Guel abuse Miorine for two school years and didn’t do anything about it. Asshole. He hates Guel for “dirtying” his precious waifu, even though she’s told him to get bent already. He didn’t care about her dying during the Plant Quetta accident because she would have died with his image of her intact, but now he’s left coping and seething.

- Lauda is similarly coping and seething by thinking that Miorine is ruining his older brother. He just hasn’t realized that Guel has grown independent, and Lauda needs to as well.

- The meeting between Miorine and the Earthian representatives was very interesting. Miorine brought up job prospects, but the Earthians don’t care about that. They want people to stop assaulting, murdering, and taking advantage of them! It’s only until Miorine brings them something that can truly help, medical equipment, that they listen to her. But they still aren’t ready to support her because she has no real power. Sadly the small amount of trust they built up was destroyed due to Prospera’s machinations.

- Suletta truly embodying the tanuki she is by digging through the trash, but luckily, Chuchu comes to help her once again and bring her to her friends. Earth House loves her, and they’ll support her through thick and thin. And through this support, she realizes that Eri loves her too. She wants to protect her from the war and violence that she and Prospera will be inflicting. And now, Suletta is motivated to move forward properly and gain a life of her own.

- I’ve been fawning over Till since the fourth episode cause I think quiet boys are cute, but he fucking stabbed me with that hair down look. He’s such a good person, stating that Nika should be the one to tell them, and supporting Martin but not babying him. He supports Miorine on her business ventures, helped Suletta talk to Miorine, and is just an overall calming presence. Top 3 best boy, next to Guel and El5n

- And speaking of El5n, that scene in the prison room was engineered to make me go crazy. Norea is going crazy locked up in that room, only being able to think about Sophie’s death, her loneliness, and her mortality. The drawings that once comforted her are just black scribbles, showing her mental state. When El5n picks up the discarded book for fun, he passes by the dark pictures and lays his eyes on a beautiful lakefront. A life El5n never had, and a life that was cruelly taken away from Norea. They’re both just children, but they’ve been forced to bear the dark and ugly sides of the world instead of the beautiful ones. And in that moment, El5n fully understands and falls for her. He focused so much on his own life, but now he has someone else to protect. A hurt girl with no future, much like El4n, who he couldn’t save.

- As Norea screams at Nika and El5n to die, for everyone to die, she breaks down, realizing she really doesn’t want any death. She didn’t want Sophie, her almost-sister to die in such a horrible way. She doesn’t want to die for some cause that’s way grander than her. She wants a happy life indulging in the simple beauties of Earth. And El5n, someone who understands longing for a happy life despite fate’s cruel jokes, holds her hand and comforts her. The two loneliest people have found each other, and as El5n recognizes her pain, he may bow to stay with her. For someone who said he’ll live no matter what, how tragic yet poignant would it be if he sacrificed his life for Norea? I would cry my ass off. I just want them to live in a lake house, Norea making art while El5n reads books from his predecessor’s library.

- RIP Feng. She worked hard to find a way without fighting and gave Miorine a helping hand. She sniffed out the corruption in the Space League but it came too late. As she struggles from the pain the gunshot gave her, she pushes Belmeria to act. To stop looking away from the pain she’s caused and to truly make a difference for the better.

- Prospera herself doesn’t support the new Ochs Earth, using the distraction she started to destroy the Gundam facility. Prospera acts in her and Eri’s own interest. She doesn’t care about the hundreds of lives she just ruined with her plan. Those lives don’t matter to her as much as her daughter.

- But Miorine cares. As much as she tries to act distanced, she cares. It’s why she gave Suletta a tomato and searched for a way to save lives with GUND-Arm. Miorine cares for others and now in her eyes, she’s caused immense suffering. She went to build up herself, but in that moment, she realized that she should have cared more for the struggling people. With Guel going off on his own revenge play, Miorine is now alone. But Suletta will support her. Just like how Earth House believes in Nika, Suletta will believe in her.

I’m not ready for next episode. Guel and Grassley are going to conflict, Norea will go even more off the deep end, and Miorine will be on her own once again, before she met Suletta.

[tekitourants]

進撃の巨人// AoT Review:

Yes, took me awhile to finally dive into this cult fav. Finally did and I just have a lot to say so here’s a critical review that no one asked for.

“過去に囚われ、未来に誘導され”

ようこそ、残酷な希望なき世界へ。

Shingeki no Kyojin isn't afraid to get dark. It’s a brutal world where the lines between good and evil are constantly blurred. That's why I have to give credit to Hajime-sensei for tackling such mature themes. The exploration of the sins of the past and their impact on the present is undeniably powerful. The concept of self-punishment and generational burden in an enclosed world setting, while perhaps under-developed, draws a critical parallel to real-world historical cycles of violence.

But here's where the narrative falters for me: AoT focus on Eren narrows the scope of the story. We never truly see the world through other characters' eyes. The series elevates Titans to a near-mythological status solely based on bloodlines, neglecting the potential for a more nuanced exploration of political conflict. Imagine delving into the motivations and societal structures of Marley, or witnessing a more potent internal struggles for power within Paradis' government. It had potential but focusing on Eren essentially shuts this exploration.

What truly frustrates me is Eren's character development.

Eren Yeager's descent into villainy, while undeniably dramatic, felt like a missed opportunity. His motivations as an "angsty teen with future memories" lacked nuance, and his solution – the Rumbling – was a self-justified descent into violence. The world of AoT is meticulously crafted, rife with complex political machinations. Surely, with the power of the Founding Titan, Eren could have explored more strategic, (and to stick with dark fantasy theme) anti-heroic options. Negotiations, leveraging Paradis' hidden tech, or even the ethically dubious path of Zeke's euthanasia plan – all presented potentially more interesting narratives than the world-ending Rumbling. Perhaps, I was just… frustrated by the narrowness of everyone’s mind, each one a slave to their own problems.

Eren's journey, while tragic, felt like a downer ending to a series brimming with potential. The story does an excellent job of making you uncomfortable and angry, which is a testament to Isayama's storytelling. The setting, the world-making, and the themes are all incredible. But for me, the series falters by failing to break the cycle of violence through its protagonist. Letting the fans think is great, but with Eren's arc, there's a lingering sense of hopelessness that just doesn't resonate with me personally. Accepting the extreme choices that Eren made, that the Yaegerists fell into, and all the darkness and misery feels like a validation I refuse to give to real-life bad decisions made under the pressure of やむを得ない//“there’s no better way”.

Eren's character arc feels like a self-directed (自作自演) tragedy. His motivations are heavily influenced by his own premonitions, which limits his agency and makes him a pawn of his own fate. This deterministic approach to character development, while thought-provoking, ultimately feels unsatisfying.

Anyways, my opinion is my own and I admit that AoT successfully made me a critical fan and I appreciate the experience but as an avid, veteran anime-watcher, I just find it hard to fall in love with the series because I just can’t vibe with the characters 🥴🔫

[slishthelovemachine]

[I just wrote an entire fucking review for Planetes and it got deleted by me pressing ctrl+x but is no longer present in my clipboard. I am going to scream and writhe. Here's another try.

I finished Planetes at 0200 hours this morning after a 16 hour shift on the ambulance. I read the last few short volumes of Planetes on a shift with a man I've worked with plenty of times. I felt a connection with the broader set-up of Planetes that, upon some reflection, might change how I operate as a human being who makes her living on the forefront of tiny histories in tiny people's lives with various doodads and machines in a hulking metal box. Y'know, like astronauts, or something.]

Planetes (1999-2004, Yukimura Makoto) is a manga about space, Space as a character, and all the little people who come to rest in that glittering black quilt of ice-death that is it's vacuum. The story follows Hachirota "Hachimaki" Hashino, a young man from a family of astronauts in a near-future where humanity's Cold War era space ventures never stopped. Hachimaki works with a colorful crew on a debris collecting ship, collecting the trash orbiting the Earth to keep supply and travel orbits free. The job is thankless but deeply important, something frequently expressed by everyone else but Hachimaki, who bristles at the lack of grandiosity in picking up space-refuse.

Hachimaki develops and matures as a young man in space, and those developments come when he faces Space with his ever-evolving Self and receives different revelations in return. These revelations are preceded by explorations of the lives surrounding Hachimaki's own, buffeting him with challenges and proof of the lessons he needs to learn with their own grounded complexities. I could write a lot on those lives, but I won't, because they're believable and textured in a way that feels very good to witness firsthand. So read Planetes and do that. I wouldn't do it justice here.

Yukimura's background and environment art makes for a very believable space future. The manga itself is rife with extra technical documents and concept pages (especially in the last volume) that serve as a hefty eye-meal for anyone even remotely excited by technical design and lore-shit. Yukimura's art lends itself to both quiet, grand scenes of haunting introspection and speech-bubble-loaded busy exposition pages. Warm smiles and declarations of love hit as hard as the few brief action scenes in the earlier volumes with Yukimura's bright, mature style. Planetes is as gripping visually on Earth as it is on the surface of the Moon or the cargo holds of trash-collecting ships and space stations.

Space (as a character separate from the literal thing being explored, here) is represented in a few ways throughout the manga. Sometimes, it is a white cat representing the divine indifference of the Universe at large, and sometimes it is a black cat representing the terrible death that occupies more of the vacuum than not. Sometimes Space is portrayed as Hachimaki himself, though a dark and bitter version of him, pushing him toward breaking himself on the bow of humanity's insatiable need to conquer and know.

All of these moments serve to answer the biggest (and only the biggest) questions any person truly infatuated with space has come to. Why are we up there in the first place? Should we even be "up there?" Is our purpose to die up there, or is our purpose to live? Is just living enough?

The author Yukimura Makoto answers all of these with warmth. Space is about surviving. It is about life and death itself. Space is where we are now--standing, staring up at the stars, numb to the grand warmth they sent to us from places we will never see as more than pinpricks in a vast and smothering fabric. Space is not a place to escape what makes us human. Space is about love, loneliness, marriage, nations, war--space is about everything a human being brings to it, because all we can bring to space is everything we have, and everything we have is all we will ever know.

Planetes is beautiful. Planetes grabbed 26 year old me by the ears and made me look back at 16 year old me who used to stare at space with awe and hope and wonder and said What happened? Then Planetes hugged me and said It's alright. Space isn't going anywhere. Through all the strife and misery on Earth here at the end of history, Space isn't going anywhere. Like a character in Planetes's mother tells her when she is a child: "When you can't stop crying, you're supposed to look up at the sky. 'Cause no one can cry when they're looking at the sky."

Maybe one day, humanity's big selfish dreams will take us back there, and this end of history will release it's vice grip on the world. Maybe we can rediscover what it is to live with a future in front of us. Maybe, instead of staring at the fires around us and crying while we bathe them in more gasoline, we can look to space and see ourselves whole again.

It is a selfish dream, one wracked with the imperfections and fears and oversights common to all of our best and most exciting dreams, but what is more human than that?

[jcmarchi]

Is your iPhone listening to you? Here's what to know... - CyberTalk

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/is-your-iphone-listening-to-you-heres-what-to-know-cybertalk/

Is your iPhone listening to you? Here's what to know... - CyberTalk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Have you ever found yourself wondering about whether (or not) your iPhone is listening to you? If the phone is on your person nearly 24/7, what is it hearing that you might prefer for someone not to know about or use against you? (For example, that shouting match with your spouse)

As great as the iPhone is – it’s one of the best, if not the best phone around – it’s awkward to feel like you’re continually being overheard by an invisible third-party.

So, what’s really happening? In this article, discover the truth behind iPhone eavesdropping myths, unravel misconceptions and maximize your phone’s potential.

Gain insights into the nuances of iPhone listening (or lack thereof) and see how to protect your privacy in an era rife with hacking and data compromises.

Is your iPhone listening to you?

It’s true that your iPhone might be passively listening, but perhaps not in the lawless, intrusive ways that you might imagine. Apple does not sell data to third-parties for marketing purposes. The company has explicitly stated that:

“The customer is not our product and our business model does not depend on collecting vast amounts of personally identifiable information…,” in response to a 2018 U.S. congressional inquiry.

If that’s the case, why are iPhones listening?

One of the primary reasons as to why iPhone listening occurs is to detect voice commands, like “Hey Siri”.

While highly unlikely due to Apple’s rules and compliance processes, apps could also be “listening”.

When it comes to advertising, the term “listening” really refers to the use of sophisticated machine learning algorithms, which parse apart language to find ad targeting opportunities.

It’s probably not a coincidence if you’ve had a conversation about buying a new car, and shortly thereafter, corresponding advertisements appear.

Note: This isn’t at all common to iPhones, unless they’ve been jailbroken, and typically only occurs on other device types.

What about Siri?

Siri continuously “listens” for the specific “Hey Siri” cue (and for a small number of similar sounds indicating that a person may have attempted to say “Hey Siri”).

Once a person has said “Hey Siri,” the information is largely processed locally; a somewhat recent departure from the past configuration, where information was processed on Apple’s servers.

Is the iPhone listening illegally?

For iPhones, third-party apps are required to obtain explicit user consent when collecting microphone data. At the outset, Apple reviews apps to ensure that they’re compliant.

All apps must go through the Apple Review Process for privacy compliance ahead of being green-lighted for the app store. That said, the process doesn’t guarantee that app developers can’t misbehave at a later point in time.

In other words, in regards to apps, Apple does its best to ensure that iPhones don’t eavesdrop. Accidents could theoretically occur, although the probabilities are slim and they would be clear violations of Apple’s rules.

Is iPhone listening a cause for concern?

Generally, no. If you’re concerned about iPhone listening, note that the newer generations of iPhones have an indicator at the top of the screen that shows when the mic and camera are on.

The light becomes orange when the mic is on. It turns green when the camera is on. This recently added privacy feature assists users in detecting when an app is accessing their device’s systems.

In exceptional circumstances, spyware could be deployed on a phone, resulting in listening. Typically, this only pertains to higher-profile individuals, uniquely targeted individuals, and/or to jailbroken phones.

iPhone listening privacy tips (2024)

If concerned about iPhone privacy, consider the tips below:

1. Shut off the mic for Siri and for individual applications.

To switch off your iPhone’s microphone for Siri, go to Settings > Siri & Search. Then toggle off the following:

Listen for ‘Hey Siri’

Press side button for Siri

Allow Siri when locked

To review permissions and turn off the mic for individual applications, navigate to Settings and then click on individual apps. If you don’t want the mic for that app to remain on, simply toggle the switch.

2. Consider use of a VPN, which will make your device less vulnerable to threats by providing an encrypted, private connection. Do your research and find a reputable VPN provider. Avoid VPN providers who sell your contact information to advertisers. Carefully read through a VPN provider’s privacy policy ahead of agreeing to use their service.

3. Opt for a comprehensive solution like ZoneAlarm mobile security, which uses enterprise-grade technology to protect individuals’ phones and tablets from all kinds of cyber threats.

Related resources

Zero-click iMessage exploits hit iPhones – Read story

The CISO’s Guide to Mobile Device Security – Get eBook

Top mobile security threats and how to prevent them – Learn more

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows exchanged text messages with at least 34 Republican members of Congress as they plotted to overturn President Trump’s loss in the 2020 election.

Those messages are being fully, publicly documented here for the first time.

The texts are part of a trove Meadows turned over to the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack that was obtained by TPM. For more information about the story behind the text log and our procedures for publishing the messages, read the introduction to this series. Meadows’ exchanges shed new light on the extent of congressional involvement in Trump’s efforts to spread baseless conspiracy theories about his defeat and his attempts to reverse it. The messages document the role members played in the campaign to subvert the election as it was conceived, built, and reached its violent climax on Jan. 6, 2021. The texts are rife with links to far-right websites, questionable legal theories, violent rhetoric, and advocacy for authoritarian power grabs.

One message identified as coming from Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) to Meadows on January 17, 2021, three days before Joe Biden was set to take office, is a raw distillation of the various themes in the congressional correspondence. In the text, despite a typo, Norman seemed to be proposing a dramatic last ditch plan: having Trump impose martial law during his final hours in office.

"Mark, in seeing what's happening so quickly, and reading about the Dominion law suits attempting to stop any meaningful investigation we are at a point of no return in saving our Republic !! Our LAST HOPE is invoking Marshall Law! PLEASE URGE TO PRESIDENT TO DO SO!!" - Rep. Ralph Norman

The text, which has not previously been reported, is a particularly vivid example of how congressional opposition to Biden’s election was underpinned by paranoid and debunked conspiracy theories like those about Dominion voting machines. Norman’s text also showed the potentially violent lengths to which some congressional Republicans were willing to go in order to keep Trump in power. The log Meadows provided to the Select Committee does not include a response to Norman’s message.

Reached via cell phone on Monday morning, Norman asked TPM for a chance to review his messages before commenting.

“It’s been two years,” Norman said. “Send that text to me and I’ll take a look at it.”

TPM forwarded Norman a copy of the message calling for “Marshall Law!!” We did not receive any further response from the congressman.

Based on TPM’s analysis, Meadows received at least 364 messages from Republican members of Congress who discussed attempts to reverse the election results with him. He sent at least 95 messages of his own. The Committee did not respond to requests for comment. Some of Meadows’ texts — notably with Fox News personalities and a couple members of Congress — have already been made public by the Committee, media outlets, and in the book “The Breach.” However, the full scope of his engagement with congressional Republicans as they worked to overturn the election has not previously been revealed.

Meadows’ text log shows what the scheme to reverse the election results looked like behind the scenes, revealing new details about which members of Congress helped spearhead the efforts and the strategies they deployed. The members who messaged Meadows about challenging the election included some of the highest-profile figures on the right flank in Congress, such as Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), and Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL), all of whom are identified as playing leading roles in the effort to undo Trump’s defeat.

One message that was dated Dec. 30, 2020 and was identified as coming from Trump campaign adviser Jason Miller described Brooks as a “ringleader” of the effort to block the electoral certification.

Miller declined to comment on this story. Brooks, who spoke with TPM on Monday morning, agreed that he played a leading part in the objection. The congressman, who is set to leave office when the next term begins on Jan. 3, 2023, suggested his case for objecting to the election result was based on a bipartisan 2005 report co-authored by former President Jimmy Carter and James Baker III, who served in multiple Republican administrations.

“There are a number of different people who took leadership roles,” Brooks said of the election challenge, adding, “I was certainly the leader with respect to the arguments that centered on arguments related to the 2005 report and on non-citizen voting.”

While the Carter-Baker report identified risks for “potential fraud” and instances where there was some malfeasance, it also concluded that “there is no evidence of extensive fraud in U.S. election.” Nevertheless, the document has since been exaggerated and mischaracterized by Trump and others to justify election-related conspiracy theories. Nevertheless, Brooks argued the Carter-Baker report and other prior studies showed “massive voter fraud” and suggested anyone who was not familiar with the reasoning behind those conclusions was unqualified to discuss American elections.

“That’s like claiming you’re a Christian but you don’t read the Bible,” Brooks said.

When pressed on conclusions from experts and from Trump-appointed officials that there was no significant fraud in the 2020 election, Brooks hung up the phone.

Based on the log, some of the election objectors saw themselves as participating in an epic battle. Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) sent at least 21 messages to Meadows and received at least four responses. On November 6, he dramatically urged Meadows to refuse to give up.

"Mark, When we lose Trump we lose our Republic. Fight like hell and find a way. We're with you down here in Texas and refuse to live under a corrupt Marxist dictatorship. Liberty! Babin" - Rep. Brian Babin

Babin and his office did not respond to requests for comment.

Meadows’ messages also provide an indication of the support the election objection received from right-wing dark money groups. The text log shows how the Republican efforts to fight the electoral certification at the Capitol became more organized and gained steam in the days after Biden’s victory. On Nov. 9, Edward Corrigan, the president and CEO of the Conservative Partnership Institute, wrote Meadows to say Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) would be holding a meeting about legal strategies with his colleagues at the organization’s Capitol Hill townhouse.

“Mike Lee has about a dozen Senators coming over to CPI tonight and they wanted to hear from a legal expert on what’s going on with the campaign,” Corrigan wrote. “Any suggestions who would be good for that?”

CPI, which would go on to employ Meadows after Trump left office, is a dark money group that has been described by NPR as “among the most powerful messaging forces in the MAGA universe.” It hosted meetings for the far-right House Freedom Caucus and, according to Meadows’ log, served as something of a headquarters for members of Congress working to overturn the election. Corrigan did not respond to a request for comment.

In addition to Lee’s meeting, Babin sent a text to Meadows in late December 2020 describing plans for an “objector meeting” at CPI. Babin was apparently concerned other members of Congress could try to thwart the efforts to object to the electoral certification and seemingly hoped former Vice President Mike Pence — who Trump and many of his allies felt had the power to certify alternate slates of pro-Trump electors — was on their side.

"Mark, Looks like objectors will be meeting this Saturday, 6pm at the CPI facility. We would like to have you there. B PS. Probably need to keep our ears open to any machinations by Senate Dems and Republicans who want to change rules. Would you reach out to the VP and see if he will help prevent that?" - Rep. Brian Babin

Many of the Republican efforts to overturn the election played out in the public eye. During the period between the election and Jan. 6, multiple Republican members of Congress participated in rallies where they amplified violent rhetoric and spread false claims of fraud to question the results. The attack on the Capitol interrupted the electoral certification, but it continued that evening and 147 Republicans still voted to overturn the results as they were surrounded by National Guard troops and broken glass.

While some of the more than 450 texts that Republican members of Congress exchanged with Meadows indicate they were disturbed by the violence of Jan. 6, the messages also show in colorful detail how the same members of Congress played a direct role in ratcheting up opposition to the election result and in stoking Trump’s baseless claims of fraud. (Officials at every level of government including Republicans and members of the Trump administration have confirmed there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election.)

Based on Meadows’ text log, overheated battle cries began streaming into his phone as the votes were still being counted on Election Day, Nov. 3, 2020. Texts the Committee identified as coming from members of Congress declared “our Trump team is kicking ass today” and “Fight until hell freezes over than fight them on the ice.”

On Nov. 4, 2020, the day after the election, Rep. Billy Long (R-MO) wrote Meadows claiming he was personally aware of two instances of alleged fraud where people voted twice in Nevada. Based on this claim, he urged Meadows to push for a review of the race in that key state.

“I know of at least 2 people who told me they mailed in their ballots and voted in person so you can tell them they might be interested in going over all votes in Nevada,” Long wrote.

“Ok,” Meadows replied.

Long did not respond to a request for comment.

On the evening of Nov. 4, 2020, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) wrote Meadows to suggest, “John James should lead the challenge in Michigan,” an apparent reference to the 2020 GOP nominee for Senate in that state who would go on to lose his race after disputing the results without providing evidence. Last month, James won election to represent Michigan’s 10th House district. James, who, at the time, was baselessly claiming “there is enough credible evidence to warrant an investigation” into the election in Michigan, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Davidson did not respond to a request for comment.

Shortly after the message from Davidson, the log contains one identified as coming from Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA), who offered a profane description of his support for the suits against the results in his home state. Meadows responded indicating he appreciated Kelly’s work.

Kelly did not respond to a request for comment.

President Joe Biden wouldn’t ultimately be declared the winner of the election by major media outlets until Nov. 7, 2020. In the four days between the election and the projection of Biden’s win, votes were being counted in key battleground states.

On Nov. 5, as the numbers began to look bleak for Trump, congressional Republicans wrote Meadows with offers to help fight against the results. Among them was Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) who said, “We have no tools / data / information to go out and fight RE: election / fraud. If you need / want it, we all need to know what’s going on.”

“Thanks so much. Working on it for surrogates briefing,” Meadows replied, indicating the Trump team was preparing to help organize congressional opposition to the vote.

Later that same day, Babin also suggested he and his colleagues were eager to prevent Trump’s impending loss. Without evidence, he described it as a “theft” and indicated GOP leadership was trying to focus on their election victories rather than Trump’s defeat.

"Dear Mark, Many of us as Republican House members want to help the President in any way we can to prevent the outright theft of this presidential election. So far I've only heard our leadership talk about us picking up five new diverse members while the Presidency is at stake. We need some guidance as to what we should be saying and doing. Please let some of us know what you would suggest. In earnest prayer for POTUS and our Republic. Brian Babin" - Rep. Brian Babin

The text messages show Republican members of Congress strategizing in real time to reverse the results. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) piped in with an offer to “put some cash together for the defense fund.” In a conversation with TPM on Monday, Cramer confirmed he offered to help with a defense fund, however, he said the conversation did not go anywhere.

“What I recall is I probably did offer to help if they were raising money for a defense fund or something,” Cramer explained. “I never got a response.”

Cramer, who ultimately was not among the 147 Republicans who objected to the electoral certification, also said all of his messages were “proper” and efforts to “be helpful” to “friends” in the White House.

“None of the text messages from me are condemning in any way other than to just try to get all the information again, be as helpful as you can,” Cramer said.

Other members of Congress sent Meadows questionable legal theories and wildly undemocratic plans to have the vote overturned at the state level. Rep. Mark Green (R-TN) pointed to a segment on the far-right cable network Newsmax where the political operative Dick Morris argued Republican state legislatures had the power to “declare” Trump the winner based on unproven allegations of fraud.

The text log does not include responses from Meadows to these texts from Babin, Cramer, and Green. Green’s communications director, Rachel del Guidice, provided a statement to TPM that suggested his ideas came from people in his district rather than the congressman himself.

“Congressman Green was passing along what constituents were sending him to keep the White House informed on the sentiments of his constituents,” del Guidice said. “He wasn’t advocating for any specific course of action.”

The next day, Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC) sent Meadows a couple of texts with another version of the state legislature strategy gleaned from the far-right website Revolver, which is run by Darren Beattie, a former Trump White House speechwriter who was fired from that post in August 2018 after it was revealed he participated in a 2016 conference with a high-profile white nationalist. Murphy’s text was largely copied and pasted from a Revolver article that claimed “The Vote Has Been Hopelessly Contaminated. Republican State Legislatures Must Now Move to Appoint Pro-Trump Electors.”

“Why are we not pursuing this strategy?” Murphy asked before sharing text from the Revolver article, and adding, “Please pay close attention to the very last paragraph.”

The text logs did not include any response from Meadows. Murphy did not respond to a request for comment.

On Nov. 7, shortly after news outlets called the election for Biden, Norman sent a message encouraging Meadows to set up a “game plan” and “FIGHT.”

As Trump’s allies were trying to come up with a plan on Capitol Hill, far-right activists were also gathering to protest the election around the country. The text log shows Meadows was in communication with Amy Kremer, who organized a “March For Trump” bus tour and ultimately helped plan the Jan. 6, 2021, rally on the White House Ellipse where the former president spoke and urged the crowd to “fight like hell” before many of them marched to the Capitol as it was being stormed. Messages in the log also highlight how Republican members of Congress were participating in a series of pre-Jan. 6 election protests around the country. On the afternoon of Nov. 7, Kevin Brady (R-TX) wrote Meadows to let him know that he had spoken at a “Defend the President Rally” in his home state.

“Asked the crowd to cheer for our President. They are still in the fight!” Brady wrote.

“I will pass it to potus. Thank you and thank them,” Meadows replied.

A spokesperson for Brady provided a statement to TPM that suggested he was simply trying to be helpful and encouraging.

“On the fourth day after the election, before all votes had been reported and prior to the later election contest strategy by the Trump campaign, Congressman Brady sent Mr. Meadows a photo of a local rally for the President and a single general inquiry on how he might help. There was no response from Mr. Meadows,” the spokesperson said.

Brady’s spokesperson also emphasized that he was not one of the 147 Republicans who objected to the election results.

Conspiracy theories are a major theme of Meadows’ messages with Republican members of Congress following Trump’s defeat. On the evening of Nov. 7, Rep. Ted Budd (R-NC) shared a message claiming there were links between Dominion Voting Systems and billionaire George Soros. Dominion was a focus in many 2020 election conspiracies that were thoroughly debunked. In some messages to associates, Meadows, who expressed openness to other wild theories, indicated that the Dominion theories were too far-fetched even for him. Soros has long been a fixture of far-right conspiracy theories that blend overheated analysis of the financier’s funding of progressive causes with anti-Semitic tropes.

“Praying for your health! FYI Dominion Voting Systems is owned by State Street Capital, which are Carlyle (Rubenstein alums), Rubenstein is a longtime co-investor with Soros Capital,” wrote Budd.

Budd’s message seemed to be a misspelling of Staple Street management, a private equity firm that owns Dominion, coupled with a series of claims that there were some kind of ties between various other investors. Budd did not respond to a request for comment. Last month, Budd earned a promotion when he was elected to one of the Senate seats in his home state. He is set to take office next month.

CPI was not the only conservative dark money group that aided the push to overturn the election. On Dec. 2, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) wrote Meadows and indicated he was participating in Georgia rallies organized by Club For Growth. While those events were focused on that state’s Senate runoff race, Gohmert and Greene reportedly brought up the presidential race in their remarks. In his text to Meadows, Gohmert was hoping for a ride on Air Force One or a White House visit.

Gohmert had previously texted Meadows asking to visit the White House and been rebuffed by the Chief of Staff. Based on the log, Meadows did not respond to his message about a ride on the presidential plane. Gohmert did not respond to a request for comment.

Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) is another member of Congress who texted Meadows outlandish conspiracy theories about the election. According to the log, shortly after 11 p.m. on Dec. 16, 2020, Gosar wrote in with his own completely inaccurate concerns about Dominion.

The claim made by Gosar reportedly originated with far right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ website, InfoWars. Gosar also included a link to an executive order signed by Trump in 2018 that called for the director of national intelligence to “conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government” attempted to interfere with the election within 45 days of ballots being cast. Gosar also sent Meadows a link to a fringe blog called “Some Bitch Told Me” and a since-deleted set of files that he said showed “Massive fraud coming out of AZ.” In total, the log shows Gosar sent Meadows 13 messages, nearly half of which came between Dec. 16-17, 2020. Based on the log, Meadows did not respond to any of them.

Despite Gosar seemingly gleaning his assertions from InfoWars and “Some Bitch Told Me,” Anthony Foti, a spokesperson for the congressman insisted, “at no time did he share a conspiracy theory.”

“Congressman Gosar filed objections to certification from Arizona under the Electoral Count Act,” Foti wrote in an email to TPM, adding, “His comments were based on factual occurrences.”

Meadows did entertain some of the conspiracy theories forwarded along by the Republican members of Congress — and in at least one case, he acted on them.

On Dec. 29, 2020, Babin sent Meadows a link to an article describing claims by Republican legislators in Pennsylvania that the state’s election results didn’t “add up.” The article included a statement from Pennsylvania’s Department of State that noted in detail how the lawmakers’ claims were “uninformed” and called them a “so-called analysis [that] was based on incomplete data.” Nevertheless, Meadows seemed to take Babin’s article seriously and indicated he sent it on to the Justice Department.

“Yes. Already forwarded it to DOJ,” Meadows replied to Babin’s message with the link.

On Dec. 30, 2020, Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), who had just been elected, wrote Meadows and suggested the debunked Pennsylvania analysis convinced her to object to the electoral certification.

In a text to TPM, Lummis provided an explanation for her message to Meadows.

“I voted against the Pennsylvania electors because Pennsylvania conducted its 2020 election in violation of its own Pennsylvania Constitution. Sen. Hawley had publicly expressed the same concern about Pennsylvania. That explains the text to Mark Meadows,” wrote Lummis. “I did not vote against the Arizona electors. I do not know how Sen Hawley voted re: Arizona’s electors.”

Meadows’ log also shows certain congressional Republicans playing key roles in the effort to overturn the election. In a Dec. 19, 2020, message, Rep. Jody Hice claims to be “leading the GA electoral college objection on Jan 6.” In a phone call with TPM, Sarah Selip, a spokesperson for Hice, noted he was outspoken in his opposition to the election results in his home state.

“Our boss did lead the electoral objection for Georgia. I mean that’s just how it is,” said Selip.

Ted Cruz, meanwhile, seems to have played a major part in heading up objections in the Senate. On Jan. 2, he sent Meadows a link to a statement he released with Lummis and nine other colleagues vowing to “vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.” Meadows had a one-word response to Cruz.

“Perfect,” said Meadows.

The following day, Trump campaign adviser Jason Miller wrote Meadows that Trump himself was pressing Georgia’s senators to “to get on board with the Cruz effort.” A spokesperson for Cruz declined to comment.

Brooks wrote Meadows on Dec. 21, 2020, about plans to have a “White House meeting regarding formulation of our January 6 strategies.” Later that day, Meadows sent a message to Fox News personality Brian Kilmeade later that day indicating the meeting took place.

“The President and I met with about 15 members of Congress to discuss the evidence of voter fraud in various states as well as discuss the strategy for making the case to the American people,” Meadows wrote to the cable news host. (Eleven of those members — including Babin, Biggs, Gaetz, Gosar, Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD), Hice, Jordan, Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) and Rep.-elect Marjore Taylor Greene (R-GA) — were later identified by the Jan. 6 Committee, citing White House visitor logs. Meadows aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ) also attended the meeting.)

As the electoral certification approached, members of Congress sent Meadows messages expressing concern and anger that some Republicans were not backing their efforts. On the evening of Jan. 5, 2021, Norman wrote Meadows about House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

“Mark, I hear McCarthy is giving equal time to let those who are opposed to the challenge of the electoral votes which is LUDICROUS!! Trump needs to call Kevin!!” Norman wrote.

Later that same night, Jordan presented a plan for Pence to throw out the results as he presided over the certification.

Trump would later rage at Pence for not taking this approach. Meadows responded to Jordan on the morning of Jan. 6 indicating the Vice President was not on board.

“I have pushed for this. Not sure it is going to happen,” Meadows said.

Jordan and his office did not respond to a request for comment.

In the wake of the attack on the Capitol, some members wrote to Meadows and offered encouragement for Trump. One of them was Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA). On Jan. 9, he had an idea for Trump to return to social media after he was banned from Twitter and Facebook for his part in fomenting the violence.

As ever, Meadows was on board with the plan.

“I will share it with him,” Meadows said. “Thanks Andrew”

Below is a list of all of the members of Congress identified in Meadows’ text message log. We have also included details about whether we were able to verify the contact information associated with their names and our efforts to include their comments on this story.

1. Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) – Biggs’ number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. Biggs did not respond to a request for comment.

2. Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) – Kelly’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. Kelly did not respond to a request for comment.

3. Rep. Billy Long (R-MO) – Long’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. Long did not respond to a request for comment.

4. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) – Davidson’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. Davidson did not respond to a request for comment.

5. Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) – Roy, who ultimately did not vote to object to the election results, previously confirmed he sent the texts Meadows provided to the Committee when CNN reported on his messages. When asked about this story, a Roy spokesperson directed TPM to an earlier response.

6. Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) – Babin’s number was identified by Committee investigators. TPM was unable to independently verify that the number belongs to him. Babin did not respond to a request for comment.

7. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) – Cramer, who ultimately did not vote to object to the election results, spoke to TPM for this story and his comments are included above.

8. Rep. Mark Green (R-TN) – Green’s number was identified by Committee investigators and confirmed by TPM. His office provided a statement which was included in the story above.

9. Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) – Gohmert’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. Gohmert and his office did not return requests for comment.

10. Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC) – Murphy’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. Murphy and his office did not return requests for comment.

11. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) – Committee investigators identified Gosar as using multiple phone numbers and an email address to text Mark Meadows. TPM has independently verified one of the numbers as well as the email. Gosar’s office provided a statement for this story, part of which is included above.

12. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) – Norman’s number was identified by committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. He spoke to us for this story and his comments are detailed above.

13. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) – Lee, who ultimately did not vote to object to the election results, has confirmed he sent the texts Meadows provided to the Committee that were identified as coming from his phone. Lee and his office did not respond to a request for comment on this story.

14. Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) – Brady’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. In a response that is included in this story, a spokesperson for Brady stressed that he did not vote to object to the election results.

15. Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) – Perry’s number was identified by Committee investigators. TPM was unable to independently verify that the number belongs to him. Perry and his office did not respond to a request for comment.

16. Rep. Ted Budd (R-NC) – Budd’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. Budd and his office did not return requests for comment.

17. Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN) – Emmer’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. He ultimately did not vote to object to the election results. Emmer and his office did not return requests for comment.

18. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) – Jordan’s number was identified by Committee investigators. TPM was unable to independently verify that the number belongs to him. Jordan and his office did not respond to a request for comment.

19. Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) – Hudson’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. A spokesperson requested to see the texts identified as coming from Hudson in the Meadows log. They did not respond to subsequent requests for comment.

20. Rep. Jody Hice (R-GA) – Hice’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. A spokesperson provided a comment, which is included in the story above.

21. Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) – Loudermilk’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. He did not respond to a request for comment.

22. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) – Committee investigators identified Johnson, who ultimately did not vote to object to the election results, using an email address that was confirmed by TPM. A Johnson spokesperson also issued a statement saying, “that he saw no scenario in which any of Biden’s electors would be disallowed. He also believes it is indisputable that there were a number of election irregularities that need to be addressed.”

23. Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) – Perdue’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. Perdue, who left office on January 3, 2021 and was not present for the electoral certification, declined to comment on record.

24. Rep. Rick Allen (R-GA) – Allen’s number was identified by Committee investigators. TPM was unable to independently verify that the number belongs to him. Allen and his office did not respond to a request for comment.

25. Rep. Bob Gibbs (R-OH) – Gibbs’ number was identified by committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. Gibbs and his office did not respond to a request for comment.

26. Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) – Brooks’ number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. He defended his actions in a phone interview that is included in the story above.

27. Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) – Johnson’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. Johnson and his office did not respond to a request for comment.

28. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) – Cruz’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. A spokesperson for Cruz declined to comment on this story.

29. Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) – Lummis’ phone number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. She sent us a text message that is included in the story above.

30. Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene (R-GA) – Greene’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. Her office did not respond to a request for comment.

31. Rep. Barry Moore (R-AL) – Moore’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently verified through public records by TPM. Moore and his office did not respond to a request for comment.

32. Rep. Fred Keller (R-PA) – Keller’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. Keller and his office did not respond to a request for comment.

33. Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC) – Bishop’s number was identified by Committee investigators and confirmed by TPM. He provided a statement defending his objection to the election results: “My analysis of the tactics, purposes and possible impacts of the Democrats’ national litigation campaign to disrupt 2020 election operations remains 100% factual and accurate. Consequently, I have no regrets about publishing it,” Bishop said.

34. Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) – Clyde’s number was identified by Committee investigators and independently confirmed by TPM. His office responded to a request for comment by pointing out some of his messages were reported by CNN. They did not respond to questions about the substance of his remarks.

[pagebypagereviews]

In the gripping pages of "The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War," history springs to life with a vividness that almost reverberates with the echo of cannon fire. The book serves as a time machine, transporting us back to the turbulent era that reshaped the contours of American destiny. Through the masterful narrative, the reader witnesses the interplay of colossal ambitions and frail human follies that culminated in a nation's epic struggle. This is no ordinary recount of history; it is an exploration of the human spirit, a dissection of the societal forces that led to one of the most defining moments in American history, and a timely reminder of the thin line between unity and chaos. This book review probes deep into the heart of "The Demon of Unrest," dissecting the nuanced portrayal of figures etched into the American consciousness and the lesser-known individuals whose lives were irrevocably altered by the sweeping tide of conflict. It examines how this piece of literature addresses the gaping void in our collective understanding of the emotional undercurrents that preceded the Civil War, going beyond the conventional battle-and-politics narrative. The book's significance lies in its ability to humanize the past, transforming names and dates into visceral experiences of passion, pain, and aspiration. It solves the problem of historical alienation, making the distant past resonate with contemporary relevance and underlining the lessons that are crucial for navigating the complexities of present-day society. Plot The narrative of "The Demon of Unrest" is set against the tumultuous backdrop of the pre-Civil War era, where societal tensions and ideological conflicts are at a fever pitch. The story weaves an intricate tale of individuals caught in the whirlwinds of change, where decisions teeter between moral righteousness and self-preservation. Central to the plot is a complex interplay of ambitions that are challenged by the era's harsh realities and the looming specter of war. Themes of courage, moral dilemmas, and the consequences of hubris are explored as the characters navigate a landscape rife with political unrest and personal tumult. Through a series of gripping events, alliances are forged and shattered, betrayals are endured, and the human spirit's resilience is tested. The plot adeptly captures the essence of an era where heartbreak and heroism are but two sides of the same coin, presenting a compelling narrative that encapsulates the chaos that precedes civil strife. Characters The character ensemble in "The Demon of Unrest" is a rich tapestry showcasing the diverse perspectives and backgrounds of individuals in pre-Civil War America. Protagonists in the narrative could range from idealistic young soldiers grappling with the concept of honor and duty, to seasoned political figures strategizing over the chessboard of power. The characterization allows for a deep dive into the human condition, exposing the characters' virtues and vices as they interact with one non another and face the era's demanding challenges. Through these characters, the novel examines personal ambition, the corrupting influence of power, and the moral complexities of loyalty and betrayal. Each character is meticulously sculpted to represent varying facets of human nature, thus providing a multifaceted perspective of the societal struggles of the time. Writing Style The writing style of "The Demon of Unrest" can be described as a blend of rich historical detail and evocative prose that brings the story's setting to vivid life. The author likely employs a narrative voice that is both authoritative and immersive, pulling the reader into the depths of the unfolding drama. Dialogue is crafted to reflect the period's vernacular, offering authenticity to character interactions while maintaining readability for modern audiences. Literary devices such as foreshadowing, symbolism, and irony are employed

to add layers of meaning to the text, challenging readers to delve beyond the surface narrative. The descriptive language paints a picture of the era's atmosphere, from the sumptuousness of high society to the gritty reality of the common folk, encapsulating the dichotomy that defined the period. Setting The setting of "The Demon of Unrest" is a character in its own right, providing a rich historical context that is integral to the narrative's impact. The timeframe leading up to the American Civil War is one marked by intense division and cultural upheaval, and this is captured through meticulous attention to detail. Locations within the novel might range from the opulence of Washington's political halls to the tense border states, poised on the edge of conflict. Through such settings, the author explores not just the physical landscapes but also the ideological battlefields that defined the era. Specific historical events, social customs, and technological advancements of the period are woven into the backdrop, providing a setting that is both expansive and intimate - a world on the precipice of irreversible change. Unique Aspects What sets "The Demon of Unrest" apart may be its nuanced portrayal of pre-Civil War America through a lens that balances historical fact with engaging fiction. The novel's unique aspects could include a focus on lesser-known historical figures or events that played a significant role in the build-up to the war, providing new insights into a well-trodden period of history. Additionally, the book may adopt unconventional perspectives, such as examining the impact of technological innovations like the telegraph on communication and warfare, or the role of journalism in swaying public opinion. Another unique element might be the exploration of psychological aspects of the characters, delving into what drives individuals toward acts of heroism or surrender in the face of societal unrest. Through such unique narrative choices, the book invites readers to consider the myriad factors that contribute to historical change and the human experiences that get entangled in the grand tapestry of history. Similar to The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War Book Review ```html table width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; th, td border: 1px solid black; padding: 8px; text-align: left; .pros background-color: #e0ffe0; /* Light green to highlight Pros */ .cons background-color: #ffe0e0; /* Light red to highlight Cons */ Pros The book provides a nuanced and detailed exploration of the complex social and political forces leading up to the Civil War, enabling a deep understanding of the period. Character development is strong, with individuals being portrayed in a multifaceted manner that brings the historical figures to life. Extensive research is showcased in the book, offering readers a well-documented and scholarly account that maintains a narrative flow. Cons The book's extensive detail may overwhelm casual readers looking for a more accessible introduction to the era. At times the narrative may seem slow due to the depth of historical context provided, which could potentially disrupt the pacing for some readers. With a focus on pre-Civil War events, those expecting significant coverage of the war itself may be disappointed. ``` This HTML structure provides a clear and organized way to present both the pros and cons of "The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War" Book Review. The use of bordered tables differentiates both sets of information, making each stand out while enhancing the overall user experience. Using colored backgrounds for each section further improves clarity by distinguishing between positive and negative points. Understanding the Genre and Historical Era When considering a purchase of "The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the

Dawn of the Civil War," you must first understand its genre and the historical period it covers. This novel is a historical fiction, which means it combines historical facts with fictional elements. A well-researched historical fiction book can provide insights into the era it describes while offering an engaging narrative. Examine the author's credentials and their expertise regarding the Civil War to ensure authenticity and accuracy in the depiction of events and settings. Evaluating the Author's Perspective and Narrative Style The author's narrative style significantly impacts a reader's engagement with the book. "The Demon of Unrest" may offer a unique viewpoint on the Civil War era, thereby influencing the reader’s understanding of the underlying causes and personal stories of that tumultuous time. Look into reviews and synopses to gauge whether the book’s perspective aligns with your interests and if the author’s narrative style is appealing and accessible. Notice whether the book has a character-driven or event-driven approach, and decide which you prefer. Quality of Historical Detail and Accuracy Historical accuracy is essential in providing a believable and educational reading experience. Check to see if the author of "The Demon of Unrest" has a track record of meticulous research and fact-checking. Look for comments from historians and experts in the field, as well as reader reviews, to determine if the book is praised for its accuracy. Pay attention to how the author handles the blending of fact and fiction, ensuring that historical events are not compromised for the sake of storytelling. Themes and Messages Reflect on the themes and messages that are of particular importance to you. Whether it's the moral ambiguity of war, the challenges of leadership, or the personal struggles of those on the home front, ensure that "The Demon of Unrest" contains thematic material that resonates with your interests. Understanding the central themes beforehand will help you connect with the book on a deeper level. Complexity of characters, moral quandaries, and the analysis of cause and effect within historical events can enrich your reading experience. Critical Acclaim and Reviews In making an informed decision, consider the critical acclaim and reviews from credible sources. Awards and recognitions are testimony to the book's standing in the literary world. However, be sure to read a variety of reviews, including those from both professional critics and casual readers to get a well-rounded understanding of the book's reception. This can provide insight into the potential impact the story could have on readers with taste similar to yours. Additional Content and Materials Examine if "The Demon of Unrest" offers additional content such as maps, timelines, character lists, or glossaries that can enhance your understanding of the setting and context. For historical fiction, such materials can be invaluable for keeping track of events and characters, especially if the scope of the book is broad. Consider editions that offer these supplemental materials if you find them helpful in deepening your engagement with the story and its historical background. Price and Format Finally, take into account the price and format availability. "The Demon of Unrest" may be available in various formats, including hardcover, paperback, eBook, and audiobook. Choose the format which suits your reading preferences and budget. Compare prices across different retailers, and don't forget to check if your local library has a copy if you prefer to borrow books before committing to a purchase. FAQ for The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War Book Review What is the main theme of the book "The Demon of Unrest"? The main theme of "The Demon of Unrest" revolves around the complexities of human nature during the tense period leading up to the Civil War. It explores concepts such as ambition, love, tragedy, and courage set against the backdrop of a nation on the brink of conflict.

Is "The Demon of Unrest" based on real events and historical figures? Yes, "The Demon of Unrest" intertwines fictional storytelling with real historical events and figures from the era just before the Civil War. While the characters' personal stories are a work of fiction, they are set in a factual historical context. Who is the author of "The Demon of Unrest", and what are their qualifications? The book is written by an author with a keen interest in American history and the Civil War period. Their qualifications typically include thorough research and a strong grasp of the historical narrative of the era, which is reflected in the book's detailed setting and context. Does the book review cover the historical accuracy of the events depicted in the book? The review delves into the accuracy of historical events and settings to a certain extent, evaluating how the author has woven factual elements with the fictional storyline, and whether the representation of the era is credible and well-researched. Is "The Demon of Unrest" suitable for readers of all ages? "The Demon of Unrest" is best suited for adult readers due to its complex themes, historical depth, and potential mature content related to the tribulations and societal issues of the period. How long is the book, and is it a quick read? The length of the book is not specified in the review, but it is indicated that the narrative is engrossing with a well-paced plot, making it a compelling read though not necessarily a quick one due to the depth of its historical context. Can "The Demon of Unrest" be read as a standalone novel, or is it part of a series? While the review does not explicitly state whether "The Demon of Unrest" is a standalone or part of a series, the story is presented as a self-contained saga. Readers should check with the publisher or author's website for information on any potential sequels or prequels. What formats is "The Demon of Unrest" available in? The review may mention the formats in which the book is available, which commonly include hardcover, paperback, and digital editions (eBook). For audiobook format availability, readers should check with popular audiobook retailers or the publisher. Where can I purchase "The Demon of Unrest"? The book can typically be purchased from major booksellers, both online and in physical bookstores. Additionally, readers may find it available through local libraries or specialized Civil War literature retailers. Can I find a sample chapter or excerpt from "The Demon of Unrest" to preview before buying? Potential readers looking for a sample chapter or excerpt can often find them on the publisher's website, author's website, or through online book retailers that offer a 'look inside' feature to preview a portion of the content before purchasing. In summing up our journey through the pages of "The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War," we find ourselves deeply moved by the narrative's gripping portrayal of a pivotal time in American history. This book stands as an essential read not only for history buffs but for anyone eager to understand the complex fabric of human character in times of tumultuous change. Through exemplary storytelling, the author skillfully intertwires the themes of hubris, heartbreak, and heroism, delivering an emotional and educational experience that resonates long after the final page is turned. Readers are afforded a window into the personal struggles and societal challenges of the era, garnering insights into the sacrifices made and the resilience displayed by people faced with the specter of a nation on the brink of war. Delving into these personal stories within the vast tapestry of the Civil War gives us a more profound sense of empathy and a clearer comprehension of the multifaceted nature of history. Offering more than a mere recounting of events, "The Demon of Unrest" is a book that enthralls and enlightens, guiding us through a historical journey rich with lessons still relevant today.

It's a valuable choice for any library or personal collection, providing both intellectual and emotional benefits to its readers. Enlightening, moving, and thoroughly researched, this book is a triumphant exploration of human endurance and the forces that shape the course of nations. Whether you're seeking to deepen your understanding of American history, appreciate the nuances of human nature under pressure, or simply looking for a compelling narrative filled with powerful lessons, "The Demon of Unrest" is sure to deliver. Its accounts of hubris, the poignancy of heartbreak, and the celebration of heroism make for an unforgettable reading experience that is not only informative but truly inspiring. Other The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War Book Review buying options

[lizzygrantarchives]

Complex, August 2014

Lana Del Rey knows what you think about her. And she’s learned to live with it.

Satin gowns, fast cars, pills, and parties are the lifeblood of American glamour. Red carpets, unbridled opulence, and the kind of elegance that looks amazing in high-contrast black-and-white photographs are its marrow. Icons like Sinatra, the Kennedys, Elvis, and Marilyn Monroe appeared to be beacons of the good life, but behind the velvet rope was a darker, less-than-pristine reality: one rife with gossip, addiction, betrayal, and violence. In 2014, no artist embraces both that world’s intoxicating glow and frayed seams more acutely than Lana Del Rey.

On her 2012 breakthrough, Born to Die, Del Rey cast herself as a tragic pop star from a bygone era. Her music videos were epics: on Born to Die’s title track, she begins perched regally on a throne flanked by Bengal tigers, and ends with model Bradley Soileau carrying her bloody body from the fiery wreckage of a 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1; in “National Anthem,” she plays Jackie O to A$AP Rocky’s JFK. Where many of her contemporaries reveled in little-known subcultures and outsider artists, Del Rey went for icons. “Marilyn’s my mother/Elvis is my daddy/Jesus is my bestest friend,” she wrote in the introduction to her Anthony Mandler-directed short film Tropico, released last year. Del Rey’s 20th Century nostalgia (cloaked in beats provided by Emile Haynie, Kid Cudi’s original producer, and Kanye West-collaborator Jeff Bhasker, among others) proved immensely successful. Only four albums released in 2012 outsold Born to Die, which went platinum in the U.S. and charted in 11 countries. Del Rey sold more than 12 million singles globally, received two Grammy nods (Best Pop Vocal Album, for her EP Paradise; Best Song Written for Visual Media, for “Young and Beautiful”), and sold out a North American tour.

Her arrival also attracted visceral criticism. The New York Times review of Born to Die savaged her aesthetic and artistic “pose.” Pitchfork likened her debut to a “faked orgasm.” The media seemed fixated on anything but the album’s actual music: the supposedly incongruous early recording career under her real name, the life cycle of the internet hype machine that birthed her, or the aggressively ridiculed Saturday Night Live performance that made her a household name.

In 2012, Del Rey moved from Brooklyn to L.A., and one year later began work on the full-length follow-up to Born to Die. Released in June and produced by the Black Keys’ Dan Auerbach, Ultraviolence eschews the home-run pop melodies of Born to Die for stripped-down piano intros and reverb-heavy guitar solos that give her soulful, low-register vocals space to shine. Lyrically, though, Del Rey’s stance remains uncompromising, with titles like “Money, Power, Glory” and “Fucked My Way Up to the Top” explicitly referencing her image, and taking aim at her myriad detractors. And some of her old critics have changed their tune. In its review, the New York Times called the criticisms levelled against Born to Die “inaccurate,” and lauded Del Rey’s “retro sophistication” and “guileless candor;” Pitchfork called her “a pop music original,” adding “there are not nearly enough of those around.” Despite modest radio play for the lead single “West Coast,” the album debuted No. 1 on Billboard, selling 182,000 copies in its first week (more than twice as many as Born to Die), a testament to her growing fanbase.

Sitting on the roof of Brooklyn’s Wythe Hotel for our interview, the 27-year-old “pop star” is dressed more like a suburban teenager, in light wash low-rise jeans and a tight, white, short-sleeved polo with lavender horizontal stripes. She has perfect posture and crosses her legs neatly. There’s a grace to the way she chain-smokes Parliaments and says “fuck” when she chips one of her pointed purple acrylic nails. If it’s all a show, well, it’s a good one. The cracks in the veneer of glamour humanize her and are one of the reasons she’s been able to mix self-serious writing about true love and death with provocative, pseudo-comical lines like the infamous “My pussy tastes like Pepsi Cola.”

For the next 60 minutes, Del Rey muses about sexual gamesmanship in the music industry, Marilyn, Elvis, and Jesus, and the jagged reaction to her emergence on the pop scene. And words. Del Rey is a writer—not just the subject, but also the director of her own drama. The only mark of her wealth is a gaudy diamond-encrusted choker with a cross pendant hanging just above her sternum. Its sparkle evokes the cartoonish shine of costume jewelry, though it’s every bit as real as she has turned out to be.

When you’re writing, what comes first? Song titles, melodies, music?

Well it took me a long time to write the album as it’s listed. I was writing a lot since the last record came out, but for some reason, 70% of what I was writing didn’t feel right for me. So if I’m lucky enough to have an experience that really impacts me, it comes with a verse and a melody. From there I ad lib it. But they come together, the melody and the words come together. But it happens rarely for me.

What do you mean?

Actually having that happen, where it just sort of comes. I remember with “Carmen,” I was out really late and walking to the tempo of my own rhythm, and then I just started singing, “Carmen, Carmen doesn’t have a problem lying to herself cause her liquor’s top shelf.” And it was an easy cadence. The whole thing just came, and I think I was in a really good place then, so it was like things...it was really easy to channel.

What defines being in a good place?

Feeling really happy and just circumstantially like nothing’s going wrong, which becomes more difficult but that’s only my experience. I think a lot of people think the whole thing is really great. Making Brooklyn my home base for the last two and a half weeks has really helped me out, like I’ve actually started thinking conceptually that I have this addition, an addition to this record that could come really easily. That hasn't happened in a long time. Not since I wrote that Paradise addition to Born to Die, which I really loved.

Did you miss Brooklyn?

I missed Brooklyn. I missed the people.

How are the people here different?

They’re not different. I’m a little different. The vibe is the same. I met some guys from here last week I had never met before, and they were just really easygoing. All artist types—writing during the day and hanging out at bars at night. I miss that, I like that. I haven't really found that in California yet. I relocated there because my record got a little bit bigger, but I didn’t really find a music scene that I was a part of. There was something happening—there was kind of a reemerging Laurel Canyon sound. Jonathan Wilson, Father John Misty, and I really liked those guys. I felt like maybe I had something in common with them and I slipped right into that atmosphere really well.

Let’s talk Ultraviolence. The crop of the photo on the album cover is similar to the crop of your first two album covers.

I liked that, I wanted the continuity. I didn’t have that for the album cover at the time and I wanted it to be a continuation of the story. I did like the idea of it being in black and white so that there was, literally and figuratively more to be revealed. Even color-wise.

You wanted a continuation in aesthetic for this album cover, is that something that was important to you musically for Ultraviolence as well?

Yeah. Not being misleading in terms of your personal aesthetic, like your psyche coming through design-wise and musically—I like continuity.

You have this way of exacting your creative vision through so many different parts of your art—music videos, lyrics, tone and the melody, style of dress. Are those things that you plan ahead when you think about an album? Is it a concept that grows from one idea?

I don’t know. I was in college at Fordham when I was 18. I was living between Brooklyn and New Jersey and I was working with this guy who was more famous than anyone I had met at the time, this producer David Kahne. I had that record—you know they shelved it for two years—and I had all this time to think about what was really important to me and what I actually wanted to do if I had the opportunity to do what I wanted. I knew that I wanted to make life easy for myself in the way that I would always be living in a world I constructed and whatever felt true to me, regardless of however that appeared to other people. That definitely extended to song titles, whether I shot in black and white, hair color, things like that. It’s not really something that I planned ahead. I had a sense that I wanted the world I lived in to be really personalized to what I liked.

When I hear the words “ultra” and “violence,” I think about WorldStarHipHop. What does the phrase mean to you?

That’s funny. I feel connected to two emotions—aggression and softness. I like that luxe sound of the word “ultra” and the mean sound of the word “violence” together. I like that two worlds can live in one.

What’s the relationship between violence and love?

I like a physical love. I like a hands-on love. [Pauses.] How can I say this without getting into too much trouble? I like a tangible, passionate love. For me, if it isn’t physical, I’m not interested. Everything I do feels so organized: touring, playing a show night after night with a couple months in between to make a record, and being in charge of all of it—mixing, mastering. Sometimes I meet people with a lot of fire and energy. Mentally, maybe we’re not that similar. Telepathically, we’re not on that same wavelength. If there’s a physicality and a chemistry, that ends up winning for me every time because it’s the opposite of what I have every day.

Who’s the last person you met who made you feel like that?

Dan Auerbach, for better or for worse.

Do you think a “guilty pleasure” is a real thing?

Yes, but I don’t have many of them musically. I have tons of them in life.

Do tell.

Well, smoking is one of them. Sugar, coffee. I must have 13 cups a day. It’s a shame about the health consequences because a lot of great things happen over coffee and a cigarette. A lot of great songs were written.

Why did you choose to cover Nina Simone’s “The Other Woman” on Ultraviolence?

[Sings, “The other woman has time to manicure her nails, the other woman is perfect where her rival fails.”] I relate to being the person who people come to for “such a change from the old routine,” but not being the main thing. I had a long-term relationship for seven years with someone who was the head of a label and I felt like I was that change of routine. I was always waiting to become the person who his kids came home to, and it never happened. Obviously I had to seek other relationships, and I felt like that became a pattern. I was younger—24, 25 at the time. I had known what I wanted to do for a long time. I had been serious about music since high school, and I stopped drinking when I was 18. By 24, I was a pretty serious person. I thought I was a writer, and I was a singer. I thought I knew what I wanted my path to be. The people I was drawn to were already established, but they were probably looking for someone more on their level, age-wise. But I love the idea of wrapping up the record with a reference.

Many artists use obscure references to try to prove individuality and originality. Why do you go for icons like Marilyn, Elvis, and Jesus?

When I had put out only “Blue Jeans” and “Video Games,” I caught a lot of grief from journalists asking me why I was being so literal and obvious. I referenced things like Marilyn without trying to be accessible. I have a personal relationship with my perception of who Marilyn was. She was the kind of female who was really warm and giving. I like that type of girl who’s friendly and easy. I was always looking for girls like that as friends. I felt like I knew her in that way. And Jesus—I mean, being raised Catholic, it was just a way of life. Spirituality and religion were strong. I was in Catholic school until I was 13. Like a lot of other people, I think foundationally I was hymn inspired—musical hymns, not Him, Jesus. [Laughs.]

How did you meet Dan?

I met Dan at The Riviera strip club in Queens. He was with Tom Elmhirst, who’s an amazing mixer, and I was with Emile Haynie. Emile asked if I wanted to go hang out with them and I had a lot of fun for the first time in a long time. Dan had been mixing Ray Lamontagne’s record with Tom down at Electric Lady studios. And he left by the time I was there—Lee Foster gave me Electric Lady all by myself for three weeks.

Wow.

It was incredible. By the end of the three weeks I thought I was done. Then I met Dan and he said, “Why don’t we just go to Nashville and see what happens?” I went because it sounded like a good time. I didn’t want the party to end. I flew there with Lee and we rented a farm for six weeks. We drove to Dan’s studio on 8th Street every day and I loved it. He was what I was looking for, because he was a facilitator. He said “yes” a lot. If I was like, “I only want to sing this through once,” that was normal to him. It was natural that someone would like what they got on the first try. He was cool like that. [Lights a Parliament with her plastic purple lighter.]

You’ve been smoking cigarettes on stage a lot.

Dude, I have to. I can’t get through it.

Is it an addiction?

Yeah. I’m a chain-smoker.

How long have you been smoking?

Since I was 17. It’s crazy. That’s why I try to play mostly outdoor festivals. [Laughs.] Because 45 minutes into the set, when you’ve still got 45 more minutes to go, you need to smoke.

That’s a long time to be standing in front of people.

It’s a long time. If people come and see you at a show for 80 minutes they literally know everything about you. With 5,000 people coming, they film you so the people in the back can see you on the screens. There isn’t a moment when you can turn around and gather yourself. Everything you feel, everything you’re emoting, is just there. I have toured so much more than I thought I would; I thought I would be more of a studio singer. But I toured Europe for two years.

There was a time after Paradise came out when you said you weren’t sure that you were going to make any more music. What changed?

A year after Born to Die was released, a lot of people asked me what the new record would sound like and when it was going to come out. I said, “I don’t know if there will be another record.” I didn’t have songs that I felt were good or personal enough. Dan Auerbach changed things for me, and I have no idea why. He was just interested in me. That made me feel like maybe what I was doing was interesting. He gave me some confidence back. He listened to songs that were folk songs at the time, and he thought that maybe, with some revision, they could be more dynamic. I started to see a bigger picture. For me, if I don’t have a concept it’s not worth writing a whole album. I don’t like it if there’s no story.

There are a few different ways to take your song “Fucked My Way Up to the Top.” Is it about people not wanting to give you credit for your success? Or is it about fucking people to get to the top?

It’s commentary, like, “I know what you think of me,” and I’m alluding to that. You know, I have slept with a lot of guys in the industry, but none of them helped me get my record deals. Which is annoying.

What’s the worst relationship advice you’ve received?

That love doesn’t come easily and that relationships are supposed to be a struggle. Everything else is so hard; hopefully love is the one thing that is actually fun.

That reminds me of an Eartha Kitt interview clip you once posted. Asked about love and compromise, she says, “What is there to compromise? I fall in love with myself and I want someone to share it with me.”

She was so right-on with that. It’s nice to have a fiery relationship that enhances everything you do, that doesn’t feel like part of it is not what you want.

What is the most valuable thing that you’ve destroyed in life?

In terms of money?

It doesn’t have to be, but that works.

I don’t know. I don’t think money has had an influence on things I’ve sabotaged. But there are things.

What’s something you’ve destroyed that’s actually valuable to you?

Probably the relationship I’ve been in for the last three years. Definitely demolished that through tons of depression and insecurity. Now it’s just an untenable relationship, impossible because of my emotional instability.

Sometimes people do their best writing when fucked up.

And I am a little fucked up. This whole experience has fucked me up.

Fucked you up how?

I don’t know. It’s been hard. I was in a good place when I wrote my first record because I wrote it for fun, but then, I felt like everything that went with the record was heavy. I was also trying to deal with stuff with my family. The world was heavy for a couple years. That’s why I liked Dan: He was casual. It didn’t have to be so serious.

Speaking of non-serious, what restaurant has the best red sauce in the world?

That’s a good question. I go to the same place in Los Angeles all the time, Ago on Melrose. I order the same thing every time, penne alla vodka.

What were you listening to when you were writing?

I love jazz. I love Chet Baker’s documentary Let’s Get Lost, which influenced my video for “West Coast,” which Bruce Weber shot. I love Nina Simone and Billie Holiday like everybody else. I have a ’70s playlist that I listen to daily. A lot of Bob Seger, who I love. He’s probably the main person I listen to, and also the Eagles and Chris Isaak, Dennis Wilson and Brian Wilson. I like Echo and the Bunnymen, “Killing Moon”—just like single tracks.

Do you have a guilty pleasure song on that playlist?

No, they’re all pretty good.

You experienced a level of scrutiny that was very personal. How has that affected you?

The good thing about catching so much grief from critics is that you literally do not fucking care. It put me in a mind frame where I expect things not to go right, because they generally don’t. But it’s not a pessimistic place. The music is always good, in my opinion. That’s what I expect now from my career, that the music is going to be great and the reaction’s going to be fucked up.

Why do you think they reacted so vehemently to what you were making?

If they thought it was supposed to be categorized as pop music, that was the first mistake. It wasn’t made to be popular. It was more of a psychological music endeavor. I wasn’t out to make fun, verse-chorus-verse-chorus songs. I was unraveling my history through music. People were confused as to why I would stand on stage and just sing and not perform. To me, performing is just channeling and emoting through inflection, cadence, phrasing. That’s pretty different from what’s popular, so I think maybe they thought it shouldn’t be popular. What do you think?

It felt like you were being critiqued not as an artist or even a pop musician, but as a celebutante. You presented such a comprehensive, seemingly calculated project—the videos, the styling, the references, etc.—that people felt compelled to pick it apart.

It’s funny, because my process was natural. I remember making “Video Games,” and I did my makeup as I did it every day. I put my hair up like I did. I was wearing a dress and filming myself. I didn’t think that the juxtaposition with this found footage that I had taken from people’s honeymoons on Super 8 would get the reaction it did. The reaction to everything six years prior to that, from the day when YouTube was actually born, was a non-reaction. People just didn’t care.

Do you feel vindicated?

I feel a sense of relief, but I don’t feel vindicated.

How come?

I don’t feel like things have gone well. It’s not the way I would have chosen them to go. So it’s not like I feel everything’s turned around and it’s great.

You’ve got quite a few gold records, and a handful of platinum ones.

Yeah, but I still didn’t find that community of people I was looking for, like the way Bob Dylan found his friends, or the respect of being a writer. Because that gold and platinum stuff, it doesn’t mean as much if you’re walking down the street and you can hear people saying things about you. That doesn’t even out.

Originally published on complex.com with the headline Against the Grain.

Outtakes

Lana Del Rey’s third album, Honeymoon, is out today, just 15 months after her sophomore release, Ultraviolence, solidified her place in iconic American history. This past year she has proven her staying power both as one of the most beloved pop singers in the world,and one of its most candid speakers. When she talks to the press, an activity that is becoming increasingly rare, she seems to inevitably ignite conversation. Notable examples this past year include her comments about dying young and being disinterested in feminism—both of which Kim Gordon responded to with some choice words in her memoir—as well as meeting inventor/mogul/future-enthusiast Elon Musk.

When I interviewed her for the cover of Complex’s August/September 2014 Issue, we touched on the media. But Lana was less concerned with the chatter, and more concerned with finding a group of collaborators who respect her artistry and perspective as a writer, “like the way Bob Dylan found his friends.” From the outside, it looks like she is closer than she’s ever been, working with her sister, photographer Chuck Grant, for the Honeymoon promo art, teaming up with “Shades of Cool” director Jake Nava for the literally explosive “High by the Beach” music video, contributing to the debut solo album of close friend Emile Haynie, who executive produced Born to Die, and finding new artistic synergies with artists like the Weeknd.

The more we learn about Lana, the more complete a portrait of a living, breathing human being we are able to piece together. In celebration of the release of her third album, we revisit some of the unpublished quotes from our interview that took place May 12, 2014, on the roof of Brooklyn’s Wythe Hotel. Read them below.

On Doing “Ride” With Rick Rubin

I was writing that Paradise edition, and originally was writing it as a follow-up record, but nobody wanted to release something eight months later. It ended up being a re-release-slash-second edition, and I loved this demo I did with Justin Parker, who I wrote a lot of things with like “Video Games” and “Born to Die,” “National Anthem,” and Ferdy Unger-Hamilton at EMI hated the song. So I think him and Rick had been talking and Rick was like, “What’s going on with Lana? Can she come over, I hear she’s in L.A.” I think I had been over to say “Hi” to him first. Just to say “​hi.” We took a walk in Santa Monica—he takes the same walking route every morning. Then a few weeks later I brought him “Ride,” and he really liked it. Working with him was good, I was still in my old car, my old Mercedes that was barely making it down that hour-and-a-half drive down to Shangri-La Studios in Malibu, and it was really good. He has this sprawling lawn with all these bunnies and palm trees. He was very relaxed. It was good.

On Being a Fan of Rufus Wainwright

I love him. I had this terrible experience with Rufus Wainwright actually. I was like, a long time fan of him and his sister. It’s actually why I signed with my initial label, 5 Points Records, because the boss there, David, was great friends with Loudon, their father. I thought that was amazing. Anyways, I had been waiting to meet him for a long time, and I was singing at the Montreux Jazz Festival, I think two years ago. I had a really bad show. I couldn’t hear anything on stage because my in-ears stopped working. I was having a moment backstage and Rufus came to say “Hi,” and I was trying to compliment him in between stifled sobs. I think he thought I was insane.

On Being a Fan of Martha Wainwright

She’s one of the few females I totally relate to. I love the way she uses her voice in a way that kind of explains things. The words aren’t the only things that tell a story, it’s her inflections too. That’s why I really like Cat Power. She’s my biggest female inspiration in a way. I signed with my first manager because he was managing Martha six years ago, Peter Leak, and I always hoped I’d meet her. Hers was one of the few shows I saw at the Bowery Ballroom.

On the Most Important Person She Ever Shared a Cigarette With

Probably my manager, who is still my manager, Ben Mawson, over the last four years. He doesn’t smoke anymore, but he used to smoke more than me and drink 12 beers a day. I met him, he told me to just come to London and I did. I just went and met him. I think they were at Shoreditch House, so we went on the roof and had a cigarette. He felt like I was really worried about everything, and he told me that he had a plan and that everything was going to go OK and not to worry. He was very aggressive, and he was such a believer. So probably with Ben, I guess.

On Making Art Vs. Satisfying the Major Label Machine

I came in in a unique position in that “Video Games” had so many views, and that was the reason why Jimmy Iovine at Interscope and Ferdy Unger-Hamilton at Polydor had called me on that day and wanted to revisit the record and hear it again.

So I got signed on great terms because the discussions we were having were that it was always going to be my way. I liked coming from this DIY place where if I had a single that they really felt like they wanted to put money behind or promote—I liked knowing it was an option that I could make my own video at home for it, like I did with “Video Games.” Eventually I tired of that, graduated to working with other people. But in that way I was in a really good place after the record was done with its cycle.

I think the label was half-and-half on this record [Ultraviolence] because there were a lot of jazz undertones and West Coast references. I think they were happy that I was happy with it and that I made it. I don’t think they felt like there were singles that could work at radio. And I kind of felt that, because I have such a good relationship with Jimmy and Ferdy. I’ve been working, “working” [makes air quotes], singing, for years. So the people I’m closest with are like my product manager and the video commissioner, because they’re really good girls. The A&R guys—Larry Jackson and John, if I go out at night I probably go out with them. We’re pretty flexible with each other, but it always come down to differences. For example, the bonus tracks on this record I didn’t feel like had any relation to the atmosphere of the record itself. I think iTunes was like, “You would have trouble promoting a record if it didn’t have a deluxe edition,” so, there’s stuff like that.

On the Worst Relationship Advice She Ever Received

That love doesn’t come easily and that relationships are supposed to be a struggle. I think that everything else is so hard that hopefully love is the one thing that actually is the fun part of it. [I] have had some very practical, down-to-earth advice about love that I choose not to follow. It’s the same with money too. You’re supposed to work your whole life, work really hard for everything you get. I think maybe a better strategy is to just fall in love with what you do and hope that whatever you make from that monetarily is enough to have an easy life.

Originally published on complex.com on September 18, 2015, with the headline Lana Del Rey Talks Idolizing Cat Power, Looking Up to the Wainwrights, and Ignoring Bad Relationship Advice.

[ukloansblog]

A Guide to Understanding Online Short-Term Loans in the UK

In the vibrant, ever-evolving world of personal finance, "Online short term loans" have become a buzzword for UK residents seeking quick financial solutions. But what exactly are these loans?

## Decoding Online Short Term Loans: What Are They?

Picture this: You are facing an unexpected expense – maybe your car needs urgent repairs, or your washing machine decides to retire without notice. They are small loans ranging from a hundred to a few thousand pounds. They are to be paid back within a short period by the borrower within a year.

The benefits of online short term loans lie in their accessibility and speed. You can apply from the comfort of your home, and often, you will get a decision within minutes. It is crucial to understand the terms of the loan, the interest rates, and the repayment schedule before you click that ‘apply’ button.

## The Convenience Factor: Short Loans Online

The digital age has transformed how we handle money, and short loans online are a testament to this change. You no longer need to visit a bank or fill out lengthy paperwork. A few clicks with some basic information and you are on your way to securing a loan. But convenience should not overshadow caution. It is important to properly research lenders, compare rates, and carefully read reviews. After all, not all that glitters in the online world is gold.

Always ensure you are dealing with a lender authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

## Short Term Loans with No Guarantor? No Problem!

One significant aspect of online short term loans with no guarantor option. It means you can apply for a loan without needing someone to co-sign or guarantee the repayment on your behalf. It’s a notable feature for individuals who might not have a financial support network. However, this leads to higher interest rates due to the increased risk to the lender.

## The Benefits: Why Consider Them?

1. Speed and Simplicity: Time is of the essence in emergencies. Online short term loans offer quick processing times, which can be crucial when in a bind.

2. Flexibility: You can customise these loans to your needs – whether the amount, the repayment period, or the type of interest rate.

3. Accessibility: For those with less-than-perfect credit scores, online shortterm loans can be more accessible than traditional bank loans.

## Watch Out the Risks

1. High-Interest Rates: These loans often have higher interest rates than long-term loans. It is essential to calculate the total cost before proceeding.

2. Debt Cycle Risk: Easy access to loans can lead to a cycle of borrowing. It is vital to borrow what you need and what you can afford to pay back.

3. Scams and Unreliable Lenders: The online world is rife with risks. Always opt for reputable, regulated lenders to avoid falling into a trap.

Important: Remember, these loans often come with high-interest rates. For example, borrowing £500 at an interest rate of 20% over three months could cost you around £600 in total. Always consider the total cost before proceeding.

Missing payments can cause serious money problems. For help, go to moneyadviceservice.org.uk.

## Making the Right Choice: Tips for Borrowers

1. Assess Your Situation: Only borrow if it is necessary. Consider if there are other ways to manage your financial needs.

2. Read the Fine Print: Terms and conditions can be tedious but are crucial. Understand the rates, fees, and penalties.

3. Plan Your Repayment: Have a clear plan of loan repayment. Budgeting is vital to avoiding financial strain.

4. Seek Advice: Talk to a financial advisor if you are unsure of repayment capacity. It is better to seek guidance than make a costly mistake.

It's crucial to only borrow what you can realistically afford to repay. Irresponsible borrowing can lead to serious debt issues.

## Managing Repayment and Avoiding Debt Traps

Let us talk about keeping on top of those online short term loans, alright? Start by budgeting like a boss; make sure to include your loan repayment as a critical part of your budget to keep those payments right on track. Then, to ensure you never miss a beat, set up reminders in your calendar or opt for direct debits. This way, you are less likely to forget a payment. Another savvy move is to throw in a bit extra when you have some spare cash.

Budget wisely to manage your repayments without falling into debt traps. If you're struggling with repayments, it's better to seek advice than fall behind.

## Final Thoughts: A Balancing Act

So, the journey to the comprehensive guide to understanding online short term loans in the UK is nearing its end. Short loans online can be a valuable tool in your financial arsenal but should be managed with care and responsibility. Whether for an emergency, a stop-gap solution, or a quick financial boost, these loans can be a viable option when used wisely. But here is the catch – the interest rates and fees can be steep. It is like that extra shot of espresso in your coffee – it does the job but costs more. 

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Consider seeking independent financial advice tailored to your personal circumstances.

[makemoneyusingai]

Exploring the Rapid Profit Machine (RPM): A Detailed Review of its Pros and Cons

The Rapid Profit Machine (RPM) Review: Pros and Cons

Introduction:

In today's digital age, opportunities to make money online have multiplied. One such opportunity is the Rapid Profit Machine (RPM) system, which claims to provide an automated solution for generating income. This article will explore the pros and cons of the RPM system, helping you decide if it's the right choice for you.

**Pros:**

1. **Free Initial Access:** One of the most appealing aspects of the RPM system is its initial free access. For a limited time, you can get started without any upfront cost. This makes it accessible to individuals who may be hesitant to invest large sums of money into online ventures.

2. **High Earning Potential:** The RPM system touts the potential for substantial income, with testimonials suggesting that multiple students have earned six figures as a result of this automated system. While these claims are impressive, it's essential to note that individual results may vary.

3. **Valuable Bonuses:** The RPM system offers over $4,715 worth of bonuses for free when you join. These bonuses can include additional training, tools, or resources to enhance your online marketing efforts, adding significant value to the package.

4. **Reputable Creator:** James Neville-Taylor, the mind behind RPM, is a multiple award-winning affiliate marketer and speaker. He has a track record of success and a reputation for providing value in his programs, whether they are paid or free.

5. **Ideal for Newbies:** RPM claims to be suitable for beginners, eliminating the barrier to entry for those who are new to online marketing. If you're just starting, the system aims to guide you through the process.

6. **No Continuity Fees:** Unlike some programs that lure you in with a low initial cost and then charge you monthly fees, RPM claims to have no hidden fees or continuity programs. This transparency is a refreshing change in an industry where hidden costs are common.

**Cons:**

1. **Unclear Methodology:** While RPM promises high earnings and free access, it doesn't provide a clear explanation of how the system works. It's essential to understand the methodology behind any online income-generating system to ensure it aligns with your skills and goals.

2. **Results Not Guaranteed:** The disclaimer mentioned in the RPM documentation is crucial to remember. It states that the results presented are those of action takers and does not guarantee that you will achieve similar results. Like any business venture, success depends on various factors, including your effort and market conditions.

3. **Limited Time Offer:** The offer for free access and bonuses may be available for a limited time. This creates a sense of urgency to sign up, but it's essential to evaluate the opportunity carefully and not rush into any decision.

4. **Marketing Hype:** The online marketing industry is rife with hype and exaggerated claims. While RPM presents a promising opportunity, it's crucial to approach it with a level head and not be swayed solely by the testimonials and promises.

5. **Success Not Guaranteed:** Achieving success in the online marketing world is challenging and highly competitive. The RPM system may provide valuable resources, but it's essential to understand that no system can guarantee success. It requires dedication, hard work, and adaptability.

Conclusion:

The Rapid Profit Machine (RPM) system offers a tempting opportunity for those seeking to make money online. Its free initial access, high earning potential, and valuable bonuses are undoubtedly appealing. However, it's essential to approach such opportunities with a critical eye.

Remember that while RPM may provide valuable resources and guidance, it does not guarantee success. Success in the online marketing world requires effort, a solid understanding of the methodology, and adaptability in a constantly changing landscape. Additionally, the limited-time offer and marketing hype should be taken with a grain of caution.

Ultimately, whether the RPM system is right for you depends on your individual goals, level of commitment, and willingness to navigate the challenges of the online marketing world. It's advisable to research further and consider your options before making any financial commitments.

**Additional Value:**

While the Rapid Profit Machine (RPM) system presents both pros and cons, there are several factors that can add even more value to your evaluation of this opportunity:

1. **Training and Support:** RPM promises to provide training and support for its users. The presence of educational materials and assistance from experienced marketers can significantly enhance your chances of success. It's important to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of the training provided.

2. **Community and Networking:** Joining a program like RPM can connect you with a community of like-minded individuals pursuing similar goals. This networking aspect can offer valuable insights, collaboration opportunities, and emotional support during your journey in the online marketing world.

3. **Diversified Income Streams:** Many successful affiliate marketers emphasize the importance of diversifying income streams. RPM may offer insights into various income-generating strategies, giving you the tools to explore multiple opportunities within the realm of affiliate marketing.

4. **Realistic Expectations:** Setting realistic expectations is crucial in the world of online marketing. While RPM highlights high earning potential, it's essential to remember that building a profitable online business takes time and persistence. A realistic understanding of the time and effort required can help you stay motivated and avoid disappointment.

5. **Risk Mitigation:** The initial free access to RPM allows you to evaluate the program without a significant financial commitment. This minimizes the risk associated with trying out new online ventures. It's a good practice to take advantage of free access opportunities to assess whether a program aligns with your goals.

6. **Continuous Learning:** The digital landscape is constantly evolving. A program like RPM can encourage a mindset of continuous learning, adapting to new technologies and marketing trends. This adaptability is a valuable skill in the online marketing world.

7. **Market Research Skills:** Effective online marketing often involves understanding your target audience and market. RPM may provide insights into conducting market research, a skill that can be beneficial for various online ventures.

In conclusion, while evaluating the Rapid Profit Machine (RPM) system, consider not only the immediate benefits and drawbacks but also the potential for personal and professional growth. The value of an online marketing program extends beyond immediate financial gains. It can equip you with skills, knowledge, and a network that can benefit you in various aspects of your life.

Ultimately, the decision to engage with the RPM system should be made after careful consideration of your individual goals, resources, and willingness to invest time and effort. Success in the online marketing world often comes to those who approach it with dedication and a commitment to ongoing learning and adaptation.

Don't delay—begin your path to online success by clicking here now!

**Disclaimer:**

This article may contain affiliate links, which means that if you make a purchase through these links, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. I want to emphasize that I only recommend products or services that I genuinely believe can provide value to you as a reader. My primary goal is to offer informative and helpful content. Please ensure that you make informed decisions and consider your individual circumstances before making any purchases through affiliate links. Your support through these links is greatly appreciated and assists in maintaining and improving the quality of the content provided. If you have any questions or concerns about the use of affiliate links in this article, please feel free to reach out for clarification. Your trust and satisfaction are of utmost importance.

[sptsblogs]

BitGPT Review: Legit Or Scam?

BitGPT is a recently launched automated cryptocurrency trading platform that claims to generate high returns through the use of sophisticated AI algorithms. However, the crypto space is rife with fraudulent algorithms, necessitating a thorough evaluation of BitGPT to determine whether it is legitimate and viable for traders.

An Overview of BitGPG

According to their website, BitGPT is a cryptocurrency trading platform propelled by artificial intelligence that executes automated trades on behalf of users. BitGPT asserts that it employs sophisticated machine learning and natural language processing to identify profitable crypto trading opportunities from vast market data.

BitGPT asserts that anyone with no prior trading experience can successfully trade cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc. on their platform. The trading machine performs market research, analysis, trade execution, and risk management around the clock.

Key Attributes

Here are some of the key features promoted by BitGPT:

A fully automated trading bot claiming a 95% success rate for generating consistent profits on crypto transactions.

Capability to switch between automated and manual trading. Configurable parameters.

A $250 minimum deposit is required to begin using the trading platform.

No transaction costs or commissions. Revenue for the platform derived from a 20% performance fee.

Accessibility facilitated by a user-friendly web-based platform and mobile application.

Within 24 hours, withdrawal processing times are expedited.

Support via phone, chat, and email around the clock.

Read this detailed BitGPT review for complete information.

How Automated Trading on BitGPT Operates

According to BitGPT's website, their automated crypto trading procedure includes the following steps:

Users create an account, deposit a minimum of $250, and configure their preferred trading parameters.

Using indicators, BitGPT's algorithms continuously monitor markets to identify profitable trading opportunities.

The bot executes trades automatically by purchasing and selling cryptocurrencies on integrated digital asset exchanges.

Trades are executed automatically based on technical levels and parameters that have been configured. Users can also manually intervene.

Profits from profitable automated transactions are deposited into the user's account, where they can be withdrawn or reinvested.

This hands-free method purports to deliver consistent trading gains without requiring user intervention. Traders can also trade using BitGPT's signals and analysis in manual mode.

Predicted Accuracy

One of the most prominent claims made by BitGPT is that their automated system executes crypto transactions with up to 95% precision. This indicates that it can generate profitable returns in 95 out of 100 average transactions.

In the volatile cryptocurrency markets, a victory rate of 95% seems extremely unlikely and exaggerated. When prompted to verify accuracy claims, BitGPT pointed to their website's positive customer reviews. However, the win rate cannot presently be independently verified.

Most legitimate trading algorithms have a win rate between 50 and 75 percent. Even among the most successful human merchants, it is uncommon to consistently achieve a profitability of over 90%. The claimed 95% accuracy rate should be viewed with a healthy degree of skepticism.

Costs and Fees

According to their website, BitGPT does not charge any trading fees, commissions, or fees for deposits and withdrawals. All transaction fees are covered by BitGPT.

To activate an account and begin trading, users need only deposit the minimum amount of $250. As a revenue mechanism, BitGPT collects a 20% performance fee on net profits generated from trading activity. For instance, a platform fee of $200 is deducted from a $1000 trading profit.

In comparison to competitors who may charge commissions, having no trading fees is an advantage. However, the 20% profit commission is above average, as the majority of crypto fund managers charge 15% or less.

Safety and Security Measures

Since users entrust BitGPT with their funds and API access, security is of the utmost importance. BitGPT asserts that accounts and assets are protected by standard measures such as 2-factor authentication, cold storage, etc.

However, specific information regarding technical security protocols is not publicly available. There appears to be no third-party auditing of cybersecurity either. Users must take BitGPT's assertions regarding its security capabilities at face value.

From a security standpoint, the dearth of mandatory KYC identity verification is also concerning. BitGPT lacks transparency in regards to critical safety practices and controls, despite the fact that a minimum level of security appears to be in place.

Customer Evaluations and Help

According to BitGPT, consumer concerns can be addressed 24/7 via phone, chat, or email. Additionally, FAQs and guides are available on their website.

Checking third-party consumer review sites reveals mostly positive testimonials from users praising the platform's seamless trading, simple withdrawals, and excellent customer service. Many have stated that BitGPT is user-friendly.

Nonetheless, since BitGPT is a relatively new platform, there are few unbiased evaluations from credible sources. Users should be wary of fake evaluations that are frequently used to enhance the credibility of a platform. Without evidence of real-world experiences, it is difficult to assess consumer satisfaction accurately.

Positives and Pluses

Several notable benefits of BitGPT, according to available information:

Low minimum deposit makes it possible for novice merchants to test the platform.

Appropriate as a passive income instrument for non-trading experts

The absence of trading fees reduces overall expenses compared to rivals

Rapid withdrawal processing expedites access to earnings

Straightforward user interface and introduction

A number of positive customer reviews signifying satisfied customers

Contraries and Cons

Notable disadvantages and warning signs include:

There is no verifiable substantiation for the claimed 95% win rate.

Lack of transparency regarding BitGPT's founders, proprietors, and team

A limited operating history creates uncertainty regarding the

There are no independent audits of security, fund management, or software performance

Unspecific regarding legal and regulatory compliance

An anonymous team precludes responsibility in the event of problems

The lack of transparency surrounding essential aspects such as the BitGPT team and independent audits casts doubt on the platform's veracity and long-term viability. Such opaque platforms always run the risk of underdelivering or shutting down without warning.

Opinion - Proceed with Caution

BitGPT appears legitimate based on available information, but it exhibits red flags typical of shady trading platforms. The claims of precision appear exaggerated, and the absence of audits is concerning.

Test the automated trading services of BitGPT with prudence using the minimum investment of $250 if you are a neophyte. Before utilizing the platform, seasoned traders may want to await additional evidence from audits and real-world evaluations.

BitGPT appears to have potential, but users should exercise caution due to the absence of transparency. Beginners can experiment with modest amounts, while experts should avoid doing so until they have seen performance data that has been verified. Overall, BitGPT warrants circumspect experimentation based on the available data.

Read More:

https://x.com/jaydenj17475992/status/1714520546925228185?s=20

https://qr.ae/pKnSCz

https://sites.google.com/view/bitgpt-reviews/home

https://groups.google.com/g/reviews54/c/_f2hkPEpge4

https://medium.com/@jaydenjohn160/bitgpt-review-does-it-really-make-you-rich-63a825a696ee

[cheetahtechnology]

What Is Natural Language Processing (NLP) & How Does It Work

In the realm of technology, few advancements have had as profound an impact on human-computer interaction as Natural Language Processing (NLP). This sophisticated field of artificial intelligence (AI) focuses on enabling machines to understand, interpret, and respond to human language in a way that feels natural to us. NLP services, offered by NLP development companies and NLP consulting services, have become integral in transforming the way we communicate with technology. In this article, we will delve into the world of NLP, exploring what it is and how it works.

Understanding Natural Language Processing (NLP)

Natural Language Processing, often abbreviated as NLP, is a subfield of AI that seeks to bridge the gap between human language and computer understanding. While humans effortlessly communicate using spoken or written language, machines initially struggled to comprehend the nuances of human language due to its complexity, context-dependency, and variations. NLP aims to give machines the ability to not only recognize words but also grasp the meaning, intent, and sentiment behind them.

NLP services encompass a wide range of applications, from chatbots and virtual assistants to sentiment analysis, language translation, text summarization, and more. The goal is to enable computers to interact with humans in a manner that feels natural and intuitive, ultimately enhancing user experiences across various platforms and devices.

How Does Natural Language Processing Work?

NLP operates through a combination of linguistics, statistics, and machine learning techniques. Here's a simplified breakdown of the NLP process:

1. Text Preprocessing: The journey begins with raw text data, which is often noisy and unstructured. Preprocessing involves tasks such as tokenization (dividing text into words or phrases), stemming (reducing words to their base form), and removing stop words (common words like "and," "the," "is" that carry little meaning). This step streamlines the text for further analysis.

2. Language Modeling: Language models, often based on deep learning architectures like recurrent neural networks (RNNs) or transformer models, learn the statistical relationships between words in a given language. These models help predict the likelihood of the next word in a sentence, capturing grammar, syntax, and semantics.

3. Named Entity Recognition (NER): NER identifies entities such as names of people, places, organizations, dates, and more within the text. This step is crucial for understanding the context of the text and extracting meaningful information.

4. Part-of-Speech Tagging: This process involves assigning parts of speech (verbs, nouns, adjectives, etc.) to each word in a sentence. Part-of-speech tagging helps in understanding the grammatical structure of the text.

5. Sentiment Analysis: Sentiment analysis determines the emotional tone of a text, classifying it as positive, negative, or neutral. This is particularly useful for understanding customer opinions, reviews, and feedback.

6. Machine Translation: NLP can enable translation between languages by analyzing patterns in bilingual texts and using them to generate accurate translations.

7. Text Generation: Advanced NLP models, like GPT-3, can generate human-like text based on a given prompt. This has applications in content creation, chatbots, and more.

8. Contextual Understanding: One of the challenges in NLP is understanding context. Language is rife with ambiguity, and words can have different meanings based on the surrounding text. Advanced models like BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) consider the context of words to improve comprehension.

NLP Services and Their Impact

The expansion of NLP services, including those provided by NLP development companies and NLP consulting services, has brought about significant transformations across industries:

1. Customer Support and Engagement: Chatbots and virtual assistants powered by NLP can offer personalized customer support 24/7. These bots understand user queries, provide relevant information, and even guide users through troubleshooting processes.

2. Healthcare: NLP can extract critical information from medical records, assist in diagnosing medical conditions, and even predict patient outcomes based on historical data.

3. E-commerce: Product recommendations based on user preferences, sentiment analysis of customer reviews, and automated responses to customer inquiries contribute to a seamless shopping experience.

4. Finance: Sentiment analysis of financial news and social media can help predict market trends, while NLP can assist in automating financial document processing and analysis.

5. Content Creation: NLP-powered tools can aid in generating content for blogs, articles, and marketing materials, saving time and effort for content creators.

6. Language Translation: NLP services have revolutionized language translation, enabling real-time translation for businesses operating in global markets.

7. Accessibility: NLP has made technology more accessible for individuals with disabilities by enabling voice commands and text-to-speech capabilities.

Challenges and Future Directions

While NLP has come a long way, it still faces challenges such as understanding sarcasm, slang, and cultural nuances. Additionally, bias in NLP models is a concern, as models can inadvertently learn biases present in training data. Efforts are underway to address these challenges through ethical AI practices and improved model training.

Looking ahead, the future of NLP holds exciting prospects. As models become more sophisticated and datasets more diverse, NLP will continue to evolve, offering even more accurate, context-aware, and human-like interactions.

Conclusion

Natural Language Processing is reshaping the way we communicate with technology. From chatbots that understand our queries to sentiment analysis that gauges public opinions, NLP services are enhancing user experiences across various sectors. With NLP development companies and NLP consulting services at the forefront, the synergy of AI and language is transforming the digital landscape. As technology advances and our understanding of language deepens, NLP's capabilities will only grow, ushering in a new era of natural, intuitive human-computer interaction.

[homewarrantyplan]

Is a Home Warranty the Preferred Choice for Homeowners' Protection?

Have you been considering the purchase of a home warranty? It's unsurprising that many homeowners are transitioning to home warranty plans for added protection. However, can you forgo investing in home insurance? Not really! Home insurance is not only essential but often mandatory in many countries. On the other hand, a home warranty holds significant value too. Are you uncertain about committing to a home warranty plan? The choice is ultimately yours, but opting for home service plan protection isn't a wasteful decision. After all, isn't it a prudent choice to safeguard your finances when household appliances experience malfunctions?

Are you confident that your luxurious kitchen systems and elaborate setup will never break down? It doesn't matter if your house is adorned with cutting-edge and expensive appliances. All machines and systems eventually experience wear and tear. Problems become more pronounced once the manufacturer's warranty has lapsed. The costs of repairing a malfunctioning system can catch you off guard. Coming up with the funds to cover these expenses might prove to be a challenge. After all, you don't always have readily available funds, do you? Can you rely on home insurance for help? Not really! Only a home warranty plan has the potential to save you a substantial amount.

A home service plan provides comprehensive appliance coverage. Are you excited to explore the variety of home warranty plans that are on offer? It's understandable to feel a bit overwhelmed by the numerous warranty options available. When you're in a dilemma and trying to determine which plan aligns with your needs, considering a few factors before making a decision is a wise approach. For instance:

Is the home warranty company both legitimate and licensed?

Regrettably, today's markets are rife with warranty companies operating without proper certification. Opting for a home service plan offered by questionable companies is akin to throwing your money away. It's wise to select companies that have a reputable presence and are well-established within the industry. Take, for example, ServicePlus Home Warranty.

Are the home warranty choices reasonably priced or overly expensive?

Opting for a home warranty plan entails an additional expense to consider. However, not choosing the right plan could result in wasted funds. Selecting a home service protection plan solely based on its high cost and extensive coverage promises might not be the wisest choice. It's prudent to thoroughly assess your options before deciding on the one that aligns with your household's systems and appliances. Plans that are more budget-friendly are often more favorable for your wallet. 

A few other pointers to keep tabs on:

Are there restrictions and maximum claim limits imposed by the home warranty company?

Do the reviews reflect positive feedback?

You might not have realized that browsing through reviews can assist you in selecting the optimal home warranty plan without straining your budget.

How does a home warranty differ from homeowner’s insurance?

Home insurance serves as a safeguard during uncertain and damaging times. Catastrophic events like floods, tornadoes, natural disasters, fires, and theft can result in significant property damage. Insurance helps cover the costs of such damages. It's evident that the destruction caused by cyclones or other natural calamities is often more severe and devastating than regular wear and tear. Having to pay for the repair or replacement of damaged appliances and home systems out of your own pocket can strain your finances. Home insurance alleviates the burden of repairing malfunctioning home systems.

However, you might wonder why you should consider a home warranty. Appliances can unexpectedly break down, leaving you with unexpected expenses. Without a home warranty plan

Refrigerators

·   Washers and dryers

·   Plumbing

·   HVAC

·   Cooking appliances and many more

ServicePlus Home Warranty presents an array of protection plans designed to fit comfortably within a homeowner’s budget. Are you seeking a solution to cover the expenses of repairing appliances that have been mishandled or subjected to rough treatment? Are you considering a home warranty as a potential solution? Unfortunately, a home warranty does not cover the costs of repairing intentionally damaged home appliances or systems.

Restoring a malfunctioning appliance to working condition can often come with a hefty price tag. ServicePlus Home Warranty steps in to alleviate homeowners' stress. Say goodbye to worrying about exorbitant costs for repairing or replacing faulty home systems. A home warranty encompasses all the expenses involved in repairing and replacing essential home components that have encountered issues.

[themovieblogonline]

All 3 episodes of unflinching new Netflix Epic WWII Series “WAR SAILOR” reviewed!

The Netflix three-episode miniseries “War Sailor” (including subtitles) is a gut-wrenching saga of mostly Norwegian civilians thrust full force into the fire of savage battle during World War II. Though not soldiers, these remarkably courageous men and women fought with pride and ferocity in defense of their families and their country. The toll taken would devastate these lives far beyond war’s end. All 3 episodes of the unflinching new Netflix Epic WWII Series “WAR SAILOR” reviewed! Streaming Series Review by John Smistad Episode 1 Young people of Norway, America, and the balance of the free world. If not already fully aware, please come to understand this. Liberty didn’t just happen. It is not the way it has always been. It was fought for. It was bled for. In buckets. By those whose soul mission it was to protect and preserve a way of life, God intends for all of us. Many of those who valiantly rose up and resisted evil with all their might selflessly give their very lives in the fray. They did this so that we could be free. You could be free. I could be free. But our freedom wasn’t free. It never will be. It is precious. Know this. Value this. Embrace this. For those you love. And for all time. In the riveting debut installment of “War Sailor”, Norwegian best friends Alfred and Sigbjørn (summarily spectacular performances by Kristoffer Joner and Pål Sverre Hagen, respectively) leave their loved ones behind in Bergen to set sail on a merchant ship bound for New York City even as World War II rages. Soon after departure, and despite Norway's formal declaration of neutrality, their home country is invaded and occupied by Nazi forces. Almost immediately the vessel and crew are surrounded and attacked at sea by German U-boats. Engulfed suddenly by death and destruction, Alfred and Sigbjørn become wary leaders of a group of common folk, altogether ill-prepared to battle back against the vicious war machine mercilessly assaulting them from all sides. As we see time and again, from now on even the most brief of lighthearted moments are fated to be shattered, violently exterminated by the jarring explosions of relentless attack. Episode 2 It is said that war is hell. If you’ve ever needed confirmation of this stark truth then I invite you to watch Episode 2 of “War Sailor”. Writer/Director Gunnar Vikene (“Himmelfall”, “Here Is Harold”) pulls absolutely no punches here, plunging his audience full force into an unrestrained and unflinching eyes wide open nightmare rife with the savagery and brutality of war. This is perhaps the most spirit-crushing, dismal, and depressing stretch I have ever personally experienced in my decades of watching cinematic productions. Friends, comrades, and fellow countrymen were all reduced to little more than primitive animals in a barbaric struggle to survive the humanity-shredding ravages of war. I must warn you that it is enormously difficult to witness. Yet herein lies the point. Freedom isn’t free. Alfred is given the news in as cold a manner as is conceivable that his life has effectively ended. Already severely psychologically scarred and brittle, we watch as a man emotionally leaves us, disintegrating into detached madness before our eyes. And as the harrowing opening scenes of Episode 1 have already revealed, Alfred as we once knew him may never again return. Episode 3 This powerful limited series finale turns what we have gathered thus far in “War Sailor” completely on its ear. It is impossible, not to mention unfair, to share the shocking revelation Vikene stuns us within the final hour of the agonizing journey this supremely talented filmmaker has so ingeniously taken us on. It is nothing short of masterful. And nothing less than overwhelmingly heartbreaking. The final frames of this profoundly affecting story are as emotionally stripped bare as I have ever processed in a motion picture. Without uttering a single syllable, Alfred and Sigbjørn, now in their 70s, are sharing a drink together at a dining room table. As with most elderly Norwegian men, they soon run out of things to say to each other. Then, without uttering so much as a single syllable, the pair “speak” to each other only through their eyes. Eyes that lock with shared recollection. Eyes that begin to blur with mutual sadness that will never let them go. Eyes that convey the spirit-vanquishing memories of unspeakable atrocities. Of that devastatingly traumatic time in their lives when everything changed. For them. For the world. Forever. Again, as gifted to us by Joner and Hagen, these moments are so astonishingly real, so emotionally arresting, that while moving beyond words, they are hard to watch. As Episode 3 concludes a series of grim statistics are presented detailing the mammoth losses and staggering death toll suffered by the vast Norwegian merchant marine fleet during World War II. Just before the closing credits roll, the critical and egregiously under-recognized role these ships and their crews played in the Allied forces' victory is made startlingly, and in no uncertain terms, resoundingly clear. Such haunting reminders serve to accentuate the heroic and everlasting legacy of those who sacrificed so much for so many they will never know. And for those alluded to previously who may not heretofore have been fully cognizant, we shall all know now. Freedom isn’t free. Fun Film Reviews  PLUS  Top Indie Entertainment Interviews! On my YouTube CHANNEL @ this link: https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnSmistad SUBSCRIBE for FREE! Read the full article