morgan rielly should be suspended, there’s no question about that. however, getting an in-person hearing with dops when you’re a first time offender with a clean history (like the spezza situation a few years back) is kind of ridiculous. considering this season, we’ve had: gallagher getting a phone hearing when he lifted his elbow (5-game suspension), dillon getting a phone hearing for an illegal check to the head (3-game suspension) and trouba full on baseball swinging his stick at someone’s head ($5000 fine)…it just doesn’t seem like there is much consistency with the dpos
37 notes
·
View notes
what is the deal with everyone identifying themselves by their birth sex? i see it all the time. everywhere. and also — maybe it's just a function of the people i happen to see, but it's almost always people saying they're "afab" rather than its complement.
it's telling, to me, what they really think of (other) trans people, because they act as if your sex at birth is constant and unchanging throughout your life. one of my coworkers said they had a low voice for an afab (meaning low for someone who's never gone through a T-dominant puberty). people use the acronym — denoting what sex a doctor determined you to be when you were born — not always accurate because sex traits can be mixed or ambiguous — as a placeholder for present-day "male" or "female."
it's the same thing, i think, as when people say that sex ≠ gender and mean that trans men are female and trans women are male. sure, some of them are, maybe (though I'd bet it wouldn't go over well calling them that), but it's called SRS for a reason; transsexual. with our current technology, we can't completely change a male person to a female one or vice versa — but we can change a whole lot of their phenotypic sex characteristics, whether that be by removing them or switching them to the other sex. that's kinda the whole point of medical transition, actually.
so to me it just, idk, it reveals how people are really thinking of their own transition as well as others', that they see your birth sex as unchanging, fixed, inevitable destiny. that's exactly what transphobes think of us. why does our own community have to think of us that way too?
11 notes
·
View notes
Wanna watch me ramble about Frank and Eddie's Parenting for Much Too Long? No? Too bad here it is anyway!
I see a lot of interpretations of Frank and Eddie as parents where Eddie is the more lenient parent while Frank is more strict. But what if it was the other way around?
Update: ok. this just turned into me talking about their flaws as parents,, oh well that's cool to think about to
Frank's "not afraid to get dirty" attitude could lend itself to him being a parent who would let his kid go about and explore (with appropriate supervision and reasonable curfew of course) and overall have more faith in them to not get in too much trouble. Curfew to him is an agreed upon time between him and the teen, so about 10-11pm, maybe 12am if they're old enough and it's not a school night. He's far less likely to ground or take away privileges if they get into trouble (unless it's school but I'll get to that), usually turning it into a learning opportunity. Maybe restricting curfew if necessary.
Eddie on the other hand, has some worry wort tendencies and would be Terrified of his babies going out on their own, even if they're supervised by a friend's parent. His idea of a weekend curfew is 7-8pm and he needs a phone call or text every hour. or maybe every half hour. And when they do get into trouble he is the first to lecture them. He's more likely to want to ground or take privileges entirely, not just change curfew. Eddie's fine with after school stuff because knows a Teacher will be there and it's a school program/function. Though field trips and prom still make him a nervous wreck.
Frank hardly gets to lecture the kid(s) because Eddie gets to it first. the only time he does is when Eddie gets Too Upset or overwhelmed and Frank's worried he'll start yelling at them.
Though Frank's not without flaw either. Frank is more concerned with grades than Eddie is. He's more likely to pressure them By Accident and bring up college a lot when they're older. Eddie on the other hand never went to college, and knowing the American school system, he probably had more 'C's than 'A's despite how smart he really is. So Eddie is less concerned with perfect grades and believes if the kid doesn't want to go to college they shouldn't be pressured into it.
I won't go too in depth but I don't think Frank did many extracurriculars in high school. Meanwhile Eddie was getting into all sorts of activities. So when their child's grades have been slipping, Frank is the one to bring up taking them out of their extracurriculars "so they can focus on their grades." To which Eddie responds with a very firm No because he knows how much extracurriculars can mean to a kid.
Frank is also more strict with chores and such. Their room needs to be clean before they go anywhere, they make their bed every day, etc. Eddie is on board, but he understands Organized Chaos and that sometimes it takes a few extra minutes to get up and start a chore. (ADHD and Depression let's go babyy) Though he is stern about getting them done by a certain time (like before dinner). Frank would rather it be done sooner/when told.
In conclusion, Frank doesn't mean to pressure them so much, and Eddie doesn't mean to be so overbearing. They're great parents, but no one is perfect. I think they'd learn and grow overtime especially with each other to bounce off of and rely on. So in the end they turn out to be great parents whose kid(s) call and visit regularly when they're adults.
12 notes
·
View notes
black mage abilities: here are fire, blizzard, and thunder, they will be your basic single target attacks
me: got it
blm: here are fire ii, blizzard ii, and thunder ii they will be your basic aoes
me: but why call them ii when they're not upgrades of i? isn't that a little confusing?
blm: shhhh, here are fire and blizzard iii. they are single target again but different from fire and blizzard i rather than being upgrades. however thunder iii is an upgrade to thunder i
me: ....
blm: now on to fire iv and blizzard iv which are not upgrades and not used for the same thing as each other. they are single target again. fire iv will partly be used instead of fire i but not all the time because of astral fire. ice iv will give you hearts which you will use for casting fire spells. however thunder iv is an upgrade to thunder ii
me: why is this happening to me I'm a good person mostly
blm: there is an aoe version of ice iv but not fire iv. guess what it's called
me: blizzard v? vi???
blm: :)
blm: freeze
me: .........
blm: also there's flare which--
me: CAN WE NOT????
blm: now let's talk about despair
me: yeah I think I achieved that back at fire and blizzard iii
blm: moving on to high fire and blizzard ii
me, sobbing: what about high fire and blizzard i
blm: shhhh
me: I hope you die. I hope we both die
blm: speaking of dying, here's ley lines
53 notes
·
View notes
spanish class
when i was sixteen my brother and i took a spanish class
it was at the local community college. he joined in because i was there, or maybe i joined the class because he was, but the fact
of the matter stood was that we were
together.
we sat next to each other sometimes, mostly next to two sisters — one in her twenties, one in her thirties
we would work together, and understood each other as
families often do.
(meaning that—
our souls are attached by
tin can telephone strings.
we can’t cut them without losing
the sound of our own voice)
the class was fun.
my brother was smart. i had only to turn to him, ask him a question, and he would explain it to me
i tried not to ask him too many questions.
i was already his kid sister. i had to be smart, had to keep up with him. i had to earn my place.
(do little sisters ever earn their place?)
at the end of the semester, the class was split into two groups:
girls versus boys, boys versus girls.
we had to do a pop oral quiz
and it came down to the two of us
i can’t remember the question, only that it was asked
and there was silence, expectation.
his brow furrowed.
i waited.
time
passed
slowly.
light entered his eyes
now was the chance
to throw in the towel
but not make it easy
i had to time this perfectly
but my tongue was too quick
i opened my mouth—
[applause]
he turned to me, after class
walking back to the car
“that wasn’t fair,” he told me
“it wasn’t,” i agreed readily
“you didn’t really win”
“i didn’t”
he wanted to go on, but he couldn’t
not when i agreed with him
so he kept his words to himself, the injustice of
losing an unfair fight
i had done what i was supposed to. he wanted to win, but win well. i couldn’t throw in the towel, pretend to be stupid. i couldn’t let him win that way.
i had to actually try and then he could win, because he was smart and he deserved it.
i had things going for me; all pretty girls do.
boys need the help.
i won by accident, and unfairly, and agreed with him when that was the case.
i shouldn’t have won.
but i wonder too, if my younger sister had won
if i would have turned around and told her that she didn’t deserve it.
i like to think that i would just accept it
but then again, i would probably
throw in the towel for her
because she’s my little sister.
now i pause in my past. maybe that’s what he did.
did he throw in the towel for me, many times?
how many times?
maybe this time he actually tried not to.
maybe that’s what was upsetting:
that the whole world would become
just as small as our childhood home.
we never took a class together again.
17 notes
·
View notes
Eeeeeeha I'm glad I'm not the only reader who fell in love with Sharpwood! Would you ever write what a scene was like with him and Pitch? Or a scene between Jack and Anton?
Sharpwood's the best!
I don't think I'll ever write a scene between Pitch and Sharpwood mostly because it's firstly two characters I don't really want to write the POVs for, but also secondly, because to me it's... a very kind of sad thing, and I don't really like writing 'sad tragic sex.'
I don't mind writing noncon, but it's hard to write hurt/hurt sex that brings very little comfort and is kind of Pitch...being unkind because Sharpwood craves being dominated (kindly) and he's trying to punish Gavril in a roundabout way and Sharpwood having to be grateful because this is all he's allowed. Knowing that's just...all he gets for hundreds of years, does not fill me with joy.
(I've done it before (noncon Gwyn/Albion), but I learned that I don't really love doing it)
Like Pitch says this about it:
‘I should have done more for him than I did,’ Pitch said finally. ‘This will have to do.’
‘You did a lot for him,’ Jack said.
‘No. I really didn’t. I was selfish. And I was always angry at his relationship with Gavril, and how he seemed untouched by it. Sometimes I pushed him, just to…have the satisfaction of knowing Gavril had broken him as much as he’d broken me. For a long time – for centuries – I didn’t know why he kept coming back to me. I became kinder to him in time. I was not…initially kind.’
It's not an explicit way to say 'I sexually tortured / coerced / hurt him just to prove he was actually broken and I could only do that by also repeatedly trying to break him for centuries' but that is essentially what Pitch is saying. And I think Pitch becoming kinder, by then, Sharpwood was already quite damaged. There's a reason Sharpwood is initially very on the fence about becoming a traitor to Gavril, despite being fond of Pitch in his own way. But Sharpwood...like, is very broken by his experiences on Lune, and Pitch is a significant part of that. (Pitch was broken by Gavril, but not by Sharpwood - Sharpwood was broken by Gavril and Pitch).
As for Jack and Anton, idk, I like writing Anton with Flitmouse more, so that's what I'm writing! Anton was always so in love with Flitmouse, and their love story appealed to me so much in TGA that writing it now has been amazing. Anton will never love anyone like he loves Alois Flitmouse, and that's just how that is. :)
8 notes
·
View notes