Aside from all the other missed emotional beats, I am flat out amazed that this season had three parallel soulmate setups with three human friends, and this show managed to do precisely nothing with it. Not one conversation in sight. Kyle's conversation would have worked with either Alex or Liz, or even Rosa, who spent the most quality time with Kyle and Isobel this season and cares about them both. But suddenly having a heart to heart M*ria who's main contribution to their dynamic this season was jeopardizing Kyle's job and berating him after his near death experience??? Jesus.
Oh for sure. Where is my Liz/Kyle/Alex Team Human interactions? That scene absolutely should have been with Alex, though I would have accepted Liz or Rosa having it instead, but m*ria of all people?! The same m*ria who invited Kyle along to watch as she threw herself off a roof and jeopardized Max's life (STILL waiting on Liz and Isobel's reaction to that news. "Sisters" my ass...) then threated continued self harm until Kyle risked his career and medical license to help her induce visions that he knows are actively damaging her brain (supposedly, though we've seen zero evidence of ill effects) when she could have just been mildly startled by a bug? That m*ria?
And then, THEN, she fucking tells him to stay out of the way of Isobel's happiness?! The woman who looked Alex in the eyes and said she knew he was feeling hopeful again, found out it was about Michael, and then said, "fuck it, people are selfish sometimes and I want someone I can tell with my powers is in a bad emotional place and has with low enough self-esteem they'll do whatever I want" is trying to tell Kyle that it's wrong to get into the middle of someone else's relationship? She is the LAST person who should have been giving anyone advice, especially since she told Isobel the exact opposite of what she needed to hear, TWICE.
They literally could not have picked a WORSE person to have that talk with Kyle. I would rather have seen him have that moment with Heath. Or even Anatsa. It literally would have made more sense for Anatsa realize Kyle has a thing for Isobel than for m*ria to be present for this conversation.
12 notes
·
View notes
So I just finished a reread of Pratchett’s Nightwatch (because it was just the 25th of May)... and it is intensely relevant to today.
While Pratchett has a few things I think he was overfond of (benevolent dictatorship and allowing his protagonists to use some questionable tactics because they are doing so with good intentions - particularly relevant to Vimes) he is quintessentially humanist and optimistic under the cynicism and there is a LOT in this book about what would make a cop a decent rather than bad cop.
And guess what, NONE of our real ass cops in our real ass lives, live up to even near HALF of what they would need to to qualify.
The premise of Nightwatch is it takes place during a period of unrest in Ankh Morpork due to corruption and abuses from those in charge and by the police (particularly the division known as the unmentionables). A series of protests become riots as people are killed.
Vimes takes control of one small precinct and takes a series of actions that I would be flabbergasted to see any cop actually take:
He repeatedly insists that police are civilians and that when they start thinking that they aren’t it means bad news because they only thing they can be then is soldiers. And if they’re soldiers they are likely to start treating the public as the enemy rather than the people they are meant to protect and he refuses to let that be the way he will treat it.
During some of the first riots:
Orders all those under his command to go unarmed and to in no uncertain terms NOT even slightly threaten the protesters or they’ll answer to him.
Arrests 3 members of the unmentionables who were lurking ready to cause trouble (armed with none of their IDs, uniforms etc of course because they weren’t meant to be easily IDd)
When one of the protesters is injured (though there’s some underhandedness involved in that in a way I don’t actually agree with) Vimes makes sure he gets prompt medical attention and that several others come in with the injured man to see that he is treated well so that everything happening is completely transparent
Invites anyone else who wants to come in, in for a cup of cocoa
When people start building barricades as things start escalating all over the city with the military called in etc.
Vime’s captain orders them to dismantle the barricades and shoot at the people making them. Vimes refuses the order and then when it’s clear the Captain will make sure something bad happens even if he has to do it himself actually knocks him out and puts him under lock and key. “We didn’t swear to obey orders.”
Instead of dismantling the barricade he asks the people if they would be willing to move the barricade to a different place that is more easily defendable as a bottleneck as well as building some in several other locations and then he has his watchmen help do so AND stand with them at the barricades (inside these barricades basically becomes the safest place in the city and they allow anyone through to join them
TL;DR:
Nightwatch is a work of fiction that shows exactly what a decent cop would look like in this situation. And we DON’T see any decent (let alone good) cops. A decent cop, a decent person would:
refuse orders to attack citizens or break up protests.
Would never lurk in crowds trying to incite anything or catch people out.
Wouldn’t be arresting people for being upset or present at a protest
Would not use/threaten force against protesters even those that are riled up and angry enough to use force (and they certainly wouldn’t escalate)
Basically they wouldn’t be doing ANY of the things we are seeing them doing
But most importantly:
They would be standing WITH people against those trying to do them harm (i.e. BAD cops... honestly Vimes and the Watch manning the barricades WITH the people to protect them from the military/ militarized police is particularly poignant and important in this context)
They would be recognizing the right of the people to protest and that they have real and important grievances and fears that have led them to protest
they would be PROTECTING people and trying to MINIMIZE danger to any citizen present including (and particularly) those protesting (and therefore those least able/equipped to protect themselves)
They would be blowing the whistle repeatedly and documenting any underhanded or illegal actions by elements within their own organisations (and arresting those who are breaking the law to gain the upper hand)
They would ACTIVELY work to protect all people before property
They would ACTIVELY show they care more about and are more committed to protecting people than order, orders and authority
When people say there are no good cops it’s because basically none do the first list and NONE of them do those last things. And those that might try basically get pushed out of the system.
“I was following orders” is NOT a defense.
“I thought I could be threatened so I used brutal methods” is NOT a defense.
“They were saying things I didn’t like, so I arrested them”, is AN INDICTMENT.
“I thought they might damage some inanimate objects/buildings so I damaged some human beings instead!” is also AN INDICTMENT
Any cop who doesn’t protect protestors is NOT a good cop
Any cop who actively harms protestors is AN AWFUL person
If we had a Vimes type doing all the above maybe we could say they were okay (and even then I don’t think the Vimes of fiction would translate to reality in a way that he could be considered actually good) but in reality cops don’t even live up to okay/ halfway decent when faced with this sort of situation that really shows their true colours.
Edit to add: To be clear a lot of my feelings about this are about how different fiction and reality are... and how much I wish reality could live up to fiction sometimes. I think the fact that we don’t see any of the above points in reality actually tell us how useless and awful the whole policing system ACTUALLY is. It ISN’T about what it pretends to be and about what it should be. We often see reflections of what it claims to be or should be in fiction that sometimes blind us to how it actually is. I just feel like Pratchett was particularly skilled at showing how it should be while calling attention to how it actually is at the same time.
11 notes
·
View notes