#chatgpt 4.0 | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

yuseirra · 9 months ago

Text

ONK CH 158 review and Character Analysis: the parallels of the protagonists with their parents + more

Starting off! I think this development might actually be okay, depending on what happens later.

It’s too early to judge whether the development is good or bad! I was really surprised... but after dissecting it, it's not as bad as I initially thought. I actually think it works and I like things about it. I've been analyzing very thoroughly lately, and I think it might be fine to wait out a bit more and see how things go.

This manga is excellent at character creation and relationship building, and this seems like a good time to explore the parallels they have with one another because it is THIS chapter that shows it very well. I thought I’d summarize my thoughts on that.

This analysis is probably the longest I've ever written, I had a lot of fun writing it too~

This was originally written in another language and I couldn't dare to rewrite the whole thing so I used my trusted partner, chatgpt 4.0.. If there's something off, it's probably that it didn't get the context. I'm going to skim over this, but writing a disclaimer just in case!

I feel like the character portrayal and relationship building in this manga are really well done, so I’ll try to summarize my thoughts on that.

(Unrelated, but "Don't"(from P3R) is really good; give it a listen!)

The lyrics of this song subtly resemble "Fatal" in tone. I've been listening to the instrumentals for it as I've been typing this out.

After reading Chapter 158, what surprised me is that despite the rushed and somewhat sparse development, I have a positive reaction to it. It’s not bad, and I’m being serious.

Though this is supposed to be the final arc, rather than tying up loose ends, each chapter still throws something new at us, and nothing has been resolved yet. Ruby tries to say something, but it immediately cuts away, and then Nino suddenly appears...

The real question is how they’re going to wrap this all up, and we can’t judge it just yet.

I didn’t predict the exact timing of the characters’ actions, but when I thought it over calmly, I realized I was pretty accurate in sense in guessing what the characters would do.

I predicted that Kamiki would turn himself in (lol), that Nino would attack Ruby, that Kamiki would see the video Ai left and change his mind at the last minute, leading to Nino’s confusion, and that Ryosuke and Nino would have some sort of relationship (it really seems like Ryosuke was acting under Nino’s orders). I really got all of that right!!

I also predicted that Ruby would surpass Ai. (There was foreshadowing, and unlike Ai, who started as an idol as a means to give love rather than as her life’s purpose, Ruby’s goal is to become an outstanding idol. Since Ruby is also Amaterasu, one of the most powerful deities in Japanese mythology, it makes sense that Ruby would surpass Ai. Ai might be related to Ame-no-Uzume or Benzaiten—Benzaiten is a goddess of the arts but also has a connection to love. These goddesses are of a lower rank compared to Amaterasu. Ame-no-Uzume’s role of bringing out a shining deity from a cave parallels Ai and Ruby’s relationship. Ruby wanted to become an idol after seeing Ai, who in this manga is concluded to be akin to a god (star).)

I’m bringing up part of my previous analysis of Ai: Ai’s efforts were partly for herself, but she also worked hard because she’s rather down-to-earth, and her motivation seemed to be making those around her happy. For instance, her reaction towards about having the dome concert was, “Is the dome that great? If it's everyone's dream, I guess it’s good,” and she tried to smile along. What’s important to this character is satisfying her curiosity about her inner void, while her achievements as an idol seemed secondary. That’s why the line about wanting to raise her children with Kamiki really hit me, because Ai’s idol work seemed to function more as a means rather than an end goal like it is for Ruby. But that doesn’t mean Ai didn’t work hard; she had a strong sense of responsibility and tried her best in everything she was given.

And seeing the mention of stars from Ruby... Yes! Stars are really important in this story, aren’t they? I've been stressing about it a whole lot lately, and I believe this is the right time to address that.

Upon close examination, the characters’ actions in this development largely align with their personalities and established traits. The confusing part is that so much hasn’t been revealed yet. What are the other characters doing? What exactly happened between these events?

It’s hard to grasp the characters' intentions because the story is progressing with so many things left hidden, creating confusion. But I think they’ll unravel these things later, so it might be best to wait.

I can’t imagine Aqua and Ruby didn’t prepare for this situation at all; if it turns out that they were caught off guard, it would be a really stupid development. However, doesn’t the last page seem oddly blurry? Why is the saturation so low on just that page? It might not be something that actually happened, just a “what if” scenario.

And even if Ruby being stabbed and in a life-threatening situation is real, there are still some possibilities for how the story could unfold (I wrote about this in this post), I don't think the chances of it happening are so high, though (but god..I want Kamiki to do something for once)

LOL, this author has a knack for condensing developments and aligning them with previous content in a way that seems chaotic to the reader... but there’s a bigger picture here. This manga is something you need to binge-read as a whole.

Looking at it from the perspective of character traits and what these characters would do, the consistency has been solid throughout. The characters’ actions make sense. If there’s something odd in this development, it’s the omitted characters. What did Aqua and Akane do? But since they haven’t appeared, there’s no way to judge.

As for Kamiki... I’ve been analyzing this character a lot lately. There isn’t much to piece together with Nino, so I had to predict with minimal information (and the actions she took were within that scope), but Kamiki... there hasn’t been much shown about what he’s been up to either (though I have a hunch... I think his songs indirectly reveal what he’s been doing all this time. So I dove in when I finally started to get it).

There’s consistency in how this character interacts with others and the actions he takes. He has a weak heart. And that perfectly aligns with why Ai was so worried and cared so much about him. It all fits. I was so anxious while analyzing him,...I can't stand the idea that Ai would see this guy, who sent another man to attack his ex-girlfriend who was raising his kids just because he was sad, in a sympathetic light. I felt that wouldn't be it from the way he spoke about her and that's why I could be very passionate about the ship (And is would that really a good story if it is?? That Ai genuinely loved such a man?;; Itd mean she chose the wrong person to love.) So, I was worried while analyzing, but no. This character is not that kind of person, and I’m about 90% sure of that after this chapter’s development. He’s just someone with terrible luck. He’s been cursed or something. This is the third time something like this has happened, for crying out loud!! I bet he was heartbroken and couldn’t attend the dome concert himself, so, he probably trusted Ryosuke who was said to be aquainted with Nino(since Ai seemed to want to be friends with Nino again, Kamiki probably knew this and trusted Nino, and him who she knows) to send a bouquet, and then disaster struck, and he fell into despair.

Now, I’ll start talking about the character design because the character portrayal in this manga is just amazing.

Kamiki... in terms of his motives for his actions, he’s a lot like Aqua. (They look similar, too, but the more I think about it, I feel like Kamiki’s natural personality and appearance are more like Ruby’s, the other twin. Their facial expressions and impressions are similar... Ruby may look just like Ai, but her physique, is similar to her father’s. She’s taller and has a broader figure than her mother. You could say the son takes after the father, and the daughter takes after the mother at first glance, but the more I see, the more it feels like Aqua takes after his mother and Ruby takes after her father.)

The twins really seem like they inherited traits from both parents. The more I see, the more fascinating it becomes... It’s like, if you were to create children for your characters, this is exactly how it should be done. They’ve done a great job designing them, and since I want to create my own story, if there’s anything I want to learn from this manga, it’s definitely this. It’s really impressive in that regard.

Back to motivation:

Kamiki (as I currently speculate) ended up taking extreme and desperate actions completely contrary to his nature after losing the person he loved (Ai) due to something he didn’t intend or wasn’t significantly responsible for (I really believe this character just tried to send flowers and it all went wrong, I'm convinced after reading Chapter 158;;).

This perfectly overlaps with Aqua’s motivation and the way he operates in the story. After losing Ai before his eyes, Aqua’s personality darkened, and he began doing things he wouldn’t normally do (using others, becoming colder, and having a twisted personality) to pursue “revenge for Ai.”

Their emotions are also similar. Aqua is severely self-critical, very depressed, and after losing Ai, he even considered just ending his life. But then he found a reason to live (revenge) and clung to it, thinking, “I can’t die yet.”

Aqua doesn’t self-deprecate in every line, but Kamiki does it once or twice every time he appears. I think his mental state is even worse than Aqua’s, and that’s because Ai was the only person in the world he could love... I’ve analyzed this before, right? For Kamiki, Ai was a combination of the positive influences that Akane and Kana had on Aqua, and moreover, Ai was his lover and the mother of his children, making her an extraordinarily special person to him. If he lost her in such a meaningless way (he probably didn’t expect Ai to die at all), given his inherently delicate nature and overwhelming guilt, he would be mentally shattered. For this reason, if this character acted after Ai’s death, it is highly likely that he would have acted even more extremely than Aqua.

The problem is, this character’s fundamental nature is much softer compared to Aqua and Ai. Aqua, despite suffering greatly while pursuing a revenge that didn’t align with his nature, was at least driven by a sense of duty and resolve. Kamiki’s situation is an escalation of this intensity, yet he cannot stop. There is no one currently to worry about him (like Akane did) or to bring him back to his original self (like Kana would). Such a person is dead and he wanted to see them again! He thinks it’s his fault they died!

Even though Aqua blames himself for it, Assuming Ai died because of Aqua is absurd; Aqua is in no way responsible for Ai’s death. However, it must be true that Kamiki provided the address (although, based on my reading up to Chapter 158, I’m convinced he only intended to send flowers). Therefore, Kamiki believes Ai died because of him. The level of guilt is different. He must have thought that something must be done to reverse this situation. He really wouldn't mind throwing himself away for his purpose.

Kamiki’s guilt is more profound, he was deeply influenced by Ai in his life, and his nature is inherently gentle and timid. And he's probably gone through actions that were twisted even more severely than Aqua’s. He's a genius actor. He acts well, but he's endured immense suffering. If you look closely at his smiling face, it’s almost as if his soul is dying. He smiles, but it’s similar to how Aqua might laugh maniacally after having decided to use Kana. Kamiki’s basic nature is softer, so instead of laughing maniacally, his smile is more subdued. It seems that he did contribute to the death of Yura. In the latest episode, there’s talk of being able to take a life for love. To revive Ai, there might be a cost to pay. Songs suggest that something like this might be the case. He might need to gather light and, feeling self-reproach, says in Mephisto’s final lyrics to his children, “Come and kill me.”

Observing Kamiki’s reactions and actions, he shows no particular signs of aggression in normal situations. If a person with this kind of nature had been involved in killing others or committing severe twisted acts, it would be actions completely against their inherent character. It would be extremely painful and unbearable. I’ve analyzed Aqua’s personality before: here's what I wrote there: noting that someone who inherently dislikes revenge and has a decent core personality would struggle with revenge (this connects to Aqua’s inherent tendency to help others, as he believes that fulfilling revenge for Ai is the same as doing something for Ai). This is why Aqua is constantly conflicted and, despite appearing rational, is hesitant and twisted. This also results in causing pain to those around him, leading to self-reproach and self-loathing, and he feels he shouldn’t be happy. Kamiki is likely experiencing this same feelings right now.

And it was Ai who brought about change in Kamiki’s heart. The only person capable of having such an impact on him was Ai, and she managed to achieve it even after death..

I have analyzed the relationship between Aqua and Kana and Akane, and compared it to the mutual relationship Kamiki had with Ai.

It's the same post I linked above, but let me do it again:

Here's how I analyzed there:

If Akane was the supportive one, then Kana was more about pulling Aqua towards her side. Drawing him towards the light, I think this aligns with Kana’s role in the story. When Aqua meets Kana, he gets revitalized (just this alone makes me think that Aqua must be truly happy with Kana).

I believe that what Ai wanted to give Hikaru ultimately was this: to support him, to share the burden with him, and then to live the future together. She wanted to share her future with him.

(...)

Both Aqua and Kana/Ai-Kamiki clearly had a similar heart- fluttering type of love for each other.

And the emotional thread between Aqua and Kana is definitely moving in a brighter direction together.

Ai wanted to give Hikaru that: to lead him from the dark place he was wandering in to the brighter side she was in.

Ai truly accomplished this. Even though she died a long time ago, she could achieve this with just a few words when it's came to him...

Kamiki probably intended to continue his path to find a way to either revive Ai or meet her in some way, and then he planned to die. Just like Aqua sometimes ominously says he has given up on becoming happy and that Ruby should be able to live even without him, it’s likely that if he continued on the path of the Black Star, he would've died.

Kana, who saw through Aqua’s feelings and told him not to even think about dying, was the one who prevented Aqua from choosing death. (Chapter 146). Kana, unknowingly, keeps pulling Aqua out of the darkness. It seems she really saved Aqua at that time. Along with Ruby’s forgiveness, Kana’s words might have been the catalyst for Aqua to correct his path of revenge, and hearing those words revitalized him.

I also think that at the very last moment, Ai managed to prevent the person she loved from dying because of her. It’s quite remarkable. Kana and Ai each turned Aqua and Kamiki away from their extreme paths to more moderate ones.

This episode revealed that a bit.

If Kamiki just turns himself in and does nothing more, I’d find it unsatisfactory, but, this parallel is what I found really clever.

Kana’s power over Aqua is surprisingly significant. Even small actions from her greatly affect Aqua. This aspect is very similar to the influence Ai had over Kamiki.

In every narrative aspect, Kamiki is a character who amplifies the emotions and motivations Aqua has. And Kamiki probably has a more delicate personality but has committed even more extreme actions. Kamiki represents the first "stage"(remember how Mephisto talks about "stages"? I think their stories could be a part of a big story, a "stage".), and Aqua represents the second stage. The second stage should use the first stage as a lesson to achieve better results.

Ruby and Ai are also the first and second stages. After reading Chapter 158, I felt it… Ah, it’s the reincarnation of Ai’s nightmare.

But is Ruby really going to be stabbed and die? Absolutely not. In fact, the way this situation suddenly emerged actually shows that such an outcome is definitely not going to happen.

Ruby will rise to a higher place than Ai. Ruby has set the goal of becoming a more brilliant idol than Ai, whereas Ai became an idol because she wanted to give love… In reality, Ai could have achieved that through her work with the children or Kamiki, and it was possible without necessarily being an idol, but Ruby’s story focuses on her career as an idol. The character’s motivation places a larger emphasis on the identity of being an "idol." Although Ai’s image as the "invincible idol" makes it hard to believe that Ruby can surpass her, (it would have been much more convincing if there had been more episodes showing Ruby’s growth in relation to this), there were indeed some foreshadowing and hints. Through the movie, Ruby came to understand Ai and thought, "I won’t end up like Mom," and that will really be the case. She won’t end up with the same fate as her mother.

Nino came dressed very similarly to Ryosuke and acted in a similar way, which means that the feelings these two characters have towards Ai are quite similar. When Nino appeared in the middle, her actions felt so, so it wasn’t surprising, and I had anticipated that this character would attack Ruby. For Nino, approaching an attacking Ruby when she's alone is more realistic and has a higher chance of success than disrupting a performance, so the occurrence of such an event with Nino appearing at this point seems to make sense. It was bound to happen at once point.

The problem with her attack actually succeeding would be that it'd make Kamiki and Aqua’s both appear extremely unaware and naïve (if Aqua can’t prevent this, it’s too sloppy considering he should have already identified Nino’s suspicious behavior, and well, Kamiki seems to be too innocent. I actually don't think it'd be out of character for HIM to be this way lol. This character truly… truly seems incapable of doubting others. He doesn’t understand human malice!!! He probably didn’t suspect Nino, Ryosuke at all. and there was no way he could know Uehara would go berserk, either. This became so apparent while reading this chapter that I couldn’t help but laugh. He’s over thirty. If Ruby is actually stabbed, Kamiki would freak out. How has he been living in the world until now with this, pure mindset? He seems so unchanged from how he was when he was young?). The page itself looks oddly blurred, making it seem like it might not actually have happened. The scene where "Nino tries to stab Ruby" is plausible. Anyhow, Given the direction in which this character has been shown, it’s a scene that could reasonably occur. The important thing is how it'd be handled and resolved later, but I believe the writers have a plan, they just drew things like this for shock value and to parallel what's happened in the earlier chapters.

And Kamiki has had at least three instances where things went bizarrely wrong, leading to people being on the verge of death or actually dying. Including Yura, that makes four times. What is this character? At this point in the story where nothing has been revealed, the characters who seem to hold the most surreal powers seem to be this character and Ruby, who seemed to be "receiving divine help" and thriving at one point. But since Kamiki’s situation appears to be completely uncontrollable, it seems like the god of absurdity and irrationality mentioned in Chapter 144 is targeting and tormenting him. It seems as though this entity is deliberately trying to drive him to despair and corruption. It’s unlikely that Kamiki himself is this god… the aftermath of these events has caused him so much suffering. At this point, he seems like a victim of a divine curse.

Examining the name of this character, it seems like his true identity might be Sarutahiko Okami, the god of light and the husband of the goddess Ame-no-Uzume. They are often depicted as a couple in subcultures, and in the Shin Megami Tensei series, they appear as summonable deities with a description of them being married. I drew a comic about this idea previously, you know? It's this comic right here:

Worried about his wife/lover hopping over to the human world, wanting to be human because she loved humans, Kamiki must have followed her, and they both lost their memories and are now wandering. Kamiki, when falling into a bad situation (which is why he had often been raising the black star since middle school), was brought happiness by Ai, who spent enjoyable times with him and led him to a better state. When he was just about to become truly happy, Ai made the decision to part ways for his sake, and Kamiki fell back into despair. It's truly unfair and absurd how his life keeps getting falling into this tormented state. I say this a lot, but he has a MISERABLE life, and I don't think that's just from pure luck. Something is cursing him from getting happy. Every time it seemed like he might finally be happy, something would erupt and prevent it from happening. I looked up at Sarutahiko, and he's a major deity and also a guardian of the land. He's related to purification rites, called "Misogi".

There was a description of the Sarutahiko Shrine, I found from a travel guide, it says, "Sarutahiko Okami is known to have appeared at the very beginning of all things to guide everything in the most benevolent direction." Kamiki has a hard time blaming others and is inherently kind. He still addresses the person who continuously tormented him, Airi, with honorifics, and even refers to Ryosuke as "Ryosuke-kun." He’s totally a pushover!!! People exploit him, and he thinks it’s all good as long as they are happy.. This psychology is quite plausible, and I pity him because of it, but It doesn’t seem to have changed much until now. His way of speaking and demeanor are still very gentle… When he appears in front of his children, his tone is very soft. By nature, he is extremely kind.

Is there a deity trying to corrupt him to increase their influence over the land?

However, it seems that Ai was able to protect him from crossing the final line.

I’ve written several things related to this, I'll just bring one example of what I've written once:

What kind of deity is the god of entertainment? If it’s the god of entertainment, it must be Ame-no-Uzume, right? It seems that the wishes made at the shrine have been fulfilled, albeit in some strange directions. Could this be Ai? Because in "Fatal", there's a lyric that goes: "selfish giant star ruined lives"… it seems to be connected with Ai, who is the incarnation of the brightest star. Her husband is a god of light, and the name connection with Hikaru is significant.

It also seems like Ai has become a guiding star, watching over everyone. In Chapter 118, the god girl spoke just as she described. That character was simply stating the truth.

Yeah. Something's been trying to corrupt Kamiki for so long now. I feel that is so... but he hasn't.. gone all the way after everything he's been through huh? In that case, maybe he also is strong in his own way.

At the end of this episode, when they talked about stars shining at night, I had this thought. Could it be that Ai, who has now become a star, is protecting her husband and children?

In the added scene from episode 1 of the anime, there’s a moment where Ai is shown smiling while pointing at the stars with her babies (during a flashback she has after having being stabbed).

Tsukuyomi’s statements are all pretty important. This character talks about "love" this time, right? If Ai is indeed a deity associated with love, it makes sense that there should be foreshadowing related to this.

Tsukuyomi, who is a friend of the other gods, might be pondering Ai’s experiences and those who loved Ai. It seems like Tsukuyomi is trying to understand what Ai’s concept of love is (Tsukuyomi was the one explaining Ai’s current state of having returned to the stars and the sea as well- how could she be so sure of it? Well she does deals with souls but I think Tsukuyomi is an acquaintance of Ai). It’s like a divine curiosity—wondering why Ai went through so much suffering by coming down to the human world.

Regarding the emotions listed alongside the characters, let’s talk about Kamiki’s feelings: I mentioned this in another post but I just really like it.

Desire, disappointment, and despair.

I think there are two major emotions related to each aspect:

The desire to be with Ai / The desire to revive Ai.

Disappointment from parting with Ai (it’s disappointment, not resentment. His heart was shattered, but this didn’t lead to aggression) / Disappointment from not being able to meet Ai no matter what.

Despair from Ai’s unexpected death / Despair from the inability to revive Ai.

These seem to align perfectly with the psychology of this character as I see it.

Kamiki has been in constant despair. His black eyes are a characteristic that appears when he is in despair. This changes twice in the story—once when Ruby shows the possibility of surpassing Ai (and he genuinely seemed pleased, as if he was proud of his daughter, right?) and again when he was shocked by what Ai said in the video. After that, his eyes are not shown, so I think he might have regained his composure. He probably returned as a white star.

This post got long and I'm worn out from writing everything here in one go: but I'd like to bring up that the main characters seem to inherit traits from their parents in a balanced way. Ruby also has aspects similar to Kamiki, and Aqua, in terms of motives and behavior, is a complete reflection of Kamiki, but his personality resembles Ai’s a lot. I also think Aqua’s eyes are similar to Ai’s, not Kamiki’s. If you look closely, Kamiki’s face is more slim, so Ruby looks more like him. The comment about Kaburagi finding Aqua’s face beautiful because it resembles Ai’s is accurate. Aqua resembles his mother more than expected. The face shows a blend of features, not just one side. It’s fascinating, and I think the character design is well done.

I’d also like to analyze how splitting Ai’s traits into two could lead to Kana and Akane.

So!! The relationship between Kamiki and Ai and the relationship between Aqua, Akane, and Kana are interlinked. Since I’m too tired to write it all out in one go, and I’ve written something similar before, I’ll skip that part.

The work is incredibly well-constructed. I think this work has a thoughtful design.

The protagonists experience situations very similar to those their parents went through, but they might achieve better outcomes. For instance, the B-Komachi group is much healthier than it was in Ai’s time, right? Things are already better than they were in the past,

Kamiki-Ai ended in tragedy (I hope they will still be happy though)

but Aqua won't end up like his dad.

Ruby won't end up like her mother either.

They're cleverly constructed to parallel each other, but are different, just as what Ruby claims. I actually have high hopes that this series would get a good closure after having seen how they are designed!

So yes, thanks for reading if you did!!/// It's going to be okay! If there's one thing I really admire about this manga, it's the way these characters are coined together and their psychology and relationships. That's the author's strength.. so no matter how this manga ends, I feel like it wouldn't stray too off from what the characters are essentially!

#oshi no ko #oshi no ko spoilers #hikaai #aqukana #hikaru kamiki #ai hoshino #ruby hoshino #aqua hoshino #spoilers #the author is really clever with this aspect. I'm impressed!#no matter how this turns out- that part of them's what I really want to learn #long post #oshi no theories

30 notes · View notes

wolfliving · 2 months ago

Text

A scholarly bibliography of Design Fiction, AI and the news, 2025

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work was funded by the Helsingin Sanomat Foundation and the Kone Foundation. We thank all the ideation workshop participants.

REFERENCES

[1] Naseem Ahmadpour, Sonja Pedell, Angeline Mayasari, and Jeanie Beh. 2019. Co-creating and Assessing Future Wellbeing Technology Using Design

Fiction. She Ji 5, 3 (2019), 209 230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.08.003

[2] ArtefactGroup. The Tarot Cards of Tech. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from https://tarotcardsoftech.artefactgroup.com

[3] Reuben Binns. 2018. Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason. Philos. Technol. 31, 4 (December 2018), 543 556.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S13347-017-0263-5/METRICS

[4] Julian Bleecker. 2009. Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction. Retrieved January 9, 2020 from

http://drbfw5wfjlxon.cloudfront.net/writing/DesignFiction_WebEdition.pdf

[5] [6] Julian Bleecker, Nick Foster, Fabien Girardin, and Nicolas Nova. 2022. The Manual of Design Fiction.

Mark Blythe. 2014. Research through design fiction: Narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (2014), 703

712. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557098

[7] Mark Blythe and Enrique Encinas. 2016. The co-ordinates of design fiction: Extrapolation, irony, ambiguity and magic. Proc. Int. ACM Siggr. Conf.

Support. Gr. Work 13-16-Nove, (2016), 345 354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957299

[8] J. Broekens, M. Heerink, and H. Rosendal. 2009. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8, 2 (2009).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00

[9] Kevin Matthe Caramancion. 2023. News Verifiers Showdown: A Comparative Performance Evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0, Bing AI, and

Bard in News Fact-Checking. Proc. - 2023 IEEE Futur. Networks World Forum Futur. Networks Imagining Netw. Futur. FNWF 2023 (2023).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/FNWF58287.2023.10520446

[10] Mia Carbone, Stuart Soroka, and Johanna Dunaway. 2024. The Psychophysiology of News Avoidance: Does Negative Affect Drive Both Attention and Inattention to News? Journal. Stud. (September 2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2310672

[11] John M. Carroll. 1997. Human computer interaction: psychology as a science of design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46, 4 (April 1997), 501 522.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1006/IJHC.1996.0101

[12] Mark Chignell, Lu Wang, Atefeh Zare, and Jamy Li. 2023. The Evolution of HCI and Human Factors: Integrating Human and Artificial Intelligence.

ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 30, 2 (March 2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3557891/ASSET/0C373876-F5A8-40E8-A46E-

273567CE2001/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/TOCHI-2021-0178-F03.JPG

[13] Justin Clark, Robert Faris, Urs Gasser, Adam Holland, Hilary Ross, and Casey Tilton. 2019. Content and Conduct: How English Wikipedia Moderates

Harmful Speech. Retrieved September 11, 2024 from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3489176

[14] Marios Constantinides, John Dowell, David Johnson, and Sylvain Malacria. 2015. Exploring mobile news reading interactions for news app

personalisation. MobileHCI 2015 - Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Human-Computer Interact. with Mob. Devices Serv. (August 2015), 457 462.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785860/SUPPL_FILE/P457-CONSTANTINIDES-SUPPL.ZIP

[15] Henry Kudzanai Dambanemuya and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2021. Auditing the Information Quality of News-Related Queries on the Alexa Voice

Assistant. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3449157

[16] [17] [18] Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2019. Automating the news: how algorithms are rewriting the media. (2019), 326.

Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial design as inquiry and practice. MIT Press.

Abraham Doris-Down, Husayn Versee, and Eric Gilbert. 2013. Political blend: An application designed to bring people together based on political

differences. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2013), 120 130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2482991.2483002

[19] Konstantin Nicholas Dörr. 2016. Mapping the field of Algorithmic Journalism. Digit. Journal. 4, 6 (2016), 700 722.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1096748

[20] Konstantin Nicholas Dörr and Katharina Hollnbuchner. 2017. Ethical Challenges of Algorithmic Journalism. Digit. Journal. 5, 4 (April 2017), 404

419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1167612

[21] Tomislav Duricic, Dominik Kowald, Emanuel Lacic, and Elisabeth Lex. 2023. Beyond-accuracy: a review on diversity, serendipity, and fairness in

recommender systems based on graph neural networks. Front. Big Data 6, (December 2023), 1251072.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/FDATA.2023.1251072/BIBTEX

[22] Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, Justin M Rao, David Blei, Ceren Budak, Susan Dumais, Andrew Gelman, Dan Goldstein, Matt Salganik, Tim Wu, and

Georgios Zervas. 2016. Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opin. Q. 80, S1 (January 2016), 298 320.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/POQ/NFW006

[23] [24] Richard Fletcher and R. Nielsen. 2024. What does the public in six countries think of generative AI in news?

Terry Flew, Christina Spurgeon, Anna Daniel, and Adam Swift. 2012. The Promise of Computational Journalism. Journal. Pract. 6, 2 (2012), 157 171.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.616655

[25] Julian De Freitas, Stuti Agarwal, Bernd Schmitt, and Nick Haslam. 2023. Psychological factors underlying attitudes toward AI tools. Nat. Hum. Behav.

242023 711 7, 11 (November 2023), 1845 1854. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01734-2

[26] Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, Ruilin Zheng, Jingyuan Cai, Keng Siau, and Langtao Chen. 2023. Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and

AI-human collaboration. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 25, 3 (July 2023), 277 304. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814

[27] Fuse. 2024. Fuse - Personalized News. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from https://pageone.livesemantics.com/

[28] hary Kenton, Mikel

Rodriguez, Seliem El-Sayed, Sasha Brown, Canfer Akbulut, Andrew Trask, Edward Hughes, and Et Al. 2024. The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants.

(April 2024), 2024 2028. Retrieved September 9, 2024 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16244v2

[29] Mingqi Gao, Xinyu Hu, Jie Ruan, Xiao Pu, and Xiaojun Wan. 2024. LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challenges. (February 2024).

Retrieved September 8, 2024 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01383v2

[30] William W Gaver, Peter Gall Krogh, and Andy Boucher. 2022. Emergence as a Feature of Practice-based Design Research. In Designing Interactive

, 517 526.

[31] Sabine Geers. 2020. News Consumption across Media Platforms and Content: A Typology of Young News Users. Public Opin. Q. 84, S1 (August 2020),

332 354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/POQ/NFAA010

[32] Nicole Gillespie, STeven Lockey, Caitlin Curtis, Javad Pool, and Ali Akbari. 2023. Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-Analytic Findings. Univ.

Queensl. KPMG Aust. 10, (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.14264/00d3c94

[33] [34] GroundNews. 2024. Ground News. Retrieved August 3, 2024 from https://ground.news/about

Michael M. Grynbaum and Ryan Mac. 2023. The Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft Over A.I. Use of Copyrighted Work. The New York Times.

Retrieved January 15, 2024 from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/27/business/media/new-york-times-open-ai-microsoft-lawsuit

[35] Derek Hales. 2013. Design fictions an introduction and provisional taxonomy. Digit. Creat. 24, 1 (March 2013), 1 10.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.769453

[36] Vikas Hassija, Vinay Chamola, Atmesh Mahapatra, Abhinandan Singal, Divyansh Goel, Kaizhu Huang, Simone Scardapane, Indro Spinelli, Mufti Mahmud, and Amir Hussain. 2024. Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cognit. Comput. 16, 1 (January

2024), 45 74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S12559-023-10179-8/FIGURES/14

[37] Michael Townsen Hicks, James Humphries, and Joe Slater. 2024. ChatGPT is bullshit. Ethics Inf. Technol. 26, 2 (June 2024), 1 10.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S10676-024-09775-5/METRICS

[38] Lennart Hofeditz, Milad Mirbabaie, Jasmin Holstein, and Stefan Stieglitz. 2021. Do You Trust an AI-Journalist? A Credibility Analysis of News

Content with AI-Authorship. ECIS (2021), 6 14. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/50

[39] Naja Holten Holten Møller, Trine Rask Nielsen, and Christopher Le Dantec. 2021. Work of the Unemployed. DIS 2021 - Proc. 2021 ACM Des. Interact.

Syst. Conf. Nowhere Everywhere (June 2021), 438 448. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462003/ASSETS/HTML/IMAGES/IMAGE3.JPG

[40] Avery E. Holton and Hsiang Iris Chyi. 2012. News and the Overloaded Consumer: Factors Influencing Information Overload Among News

Consumers. https://home.liebertpub.com/cyber 15, 11 (November 2012), 619 624. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/CYBER.2011.0610

[41] Chenyan Jia, Martin J. Riedl, and Samuel Woolley. 2024. Promises and Perils of Automated Journalism: Algorithms, Experimentat

Journal. Stud. 25, 1 (January 2024), 38 57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2289881

[42] Sangyeon Kim, Insil Huh, and Sangwon Lee. 2022. No Movie to Watch: A Design Strategy for Enhancing Content Diversity through Social

Recommendation in the Subscription-Video-On-Demand Service. Appl. Sci. 2023, Vol. 13, Page 279 13, 1 (December 2022), 279.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13010279

[43] Joel Kiskola, Thomas Olsson, Heli Väätäjä, Aleksi H. Syrjämäki, Anna Rantasila, Poika Isokoski, Mirja Ilves, and Veikko Surakka. 2021. Applying critical voice in design of user interfaces for supporting self-reflection and emotion regulation in online news commenting. In of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445783

[44] n with Black Mirror.

SIGCSE 2022 - Proc. 53rd ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ. 1, (February 2022), 836 842. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499308

[45] Tomoko Komatsu, Marisela Gutierrez Lopez, Stephann Makri, Colin Porlezza, Glenda Cooper, Andrew MacFarlane, and Sondess Missaoui. 2020. AI

should embody our values: Investigating journalistic values to inform AI technology design. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (October 2020).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420105

[46] Peter Gall Krogh, Thomas Markussen, and Anne Louise Bang. 2015. Ways of drifting Five methods of experimentation in research through design.

Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 34, (2015), 39 50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2232-3_4/TABLES/1

[47] Shaun Lawson, Ben Kirman, Conor Linehan, Tom Feltwell, and Lisa Hopkins. 2015. Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative

Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702260

[48] Hao Ping Lee, Yu Ju Yang, Thomas Serban von Davier, Jodi Forlizzi, and Sauvik Das. 2024. Deepfakes, Phrenology, Surveillance, and More! A

Taxonomy of AI Privacy Risks. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (May 2024).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642116/SUPPL_FILE/PN8548-SUPPLEMENTAL-MATERIAL-1.XLSX

[49] Sunok Lee, Minha Lee, and Sangsu Lee. 2023. What If Artificial Intelligence Become Completely Ambient in Our Daily Lives? Exploring Future

Human-AI Interaction through High Fidelity Illustrations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 39, 7 (2023), 1371 1389.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2080155

[50] rceptions of

Generative Artificial Intelligence. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 18, 24 (May 2024).

25DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642114/SUPPL_FILE/PN9381-SUPPLEMENTAL-MATERIAL-2.PDF

[51] Sixian Li, Alessandro M. Peluso, and Jinyun Duan. 2023. Why do we prefer humans to artificial intelligence in telemarketing? A mind perception

explanation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 70, (January 2023), 103139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2022.103139

[52] Joseph Lindley and Paul Coulton. 2015. Back to the future: 10 years of design fiction. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2015), 210 211.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2783446.2783592

[53] Comput. Hum. Behav. Artif. Humans 2, 1

(January 2024), 100054. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHBAH.2024.100054

[54] [55] Listen2.AI. 2024. Listen2.AI. Retrieved August 7, 2024 from https://listen2.ai/

Andrés Lucero and Juha Arrasvuori. 2010. PLEX Cards: A source of inspiration when designing for playfulness. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2010),

28 37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823821

[56] Thomas Markussen and Eva Knutz. 2013. The poetics of design fiction. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Des. Pleasurable Prod. Interfaces, DPPI 2013 (2013), 231

240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513531

[57] Suvodeep Misra, Debayan Dhar, and Sukumar Nandi. 2023. Design Fiction: A Way to Foresee the Future of Human Computer Interaction Design

Challenges. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 343, (2023), 809 822. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0293-4_65

[58] Rachel E. Moran and Sonia Jawaid Shaikh. 2022. Robots in the News and Newsrooms: Unpacking Meta-Journalistic Discourse on the Use of Artificial

Intelligence in Journalism. Digit. Journal. 10, 10 (November 2022), 1756 1774. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2085129

[59] Victoria Moreno-Gil, Xavier Ramon-Vegas, Ruth Rodríguez-Martínez, and Marcel Mauri-Ríos. 2023. Explanatory Journalism within European Fact

Checking Platforms: An Ally against Disinformation in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Soc. 2023, Vol. 13, Page 237 13, 11 (November 2023), 237.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/SOC13110237

[60] Sean A. Munson, Stephanie Y. Lee, and Paul Resnick. 2013. Encouraging Reading of Diverse Political Viewpoints with a Browser Widget. Proc. Int.

AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 7, 1 (2013), 419 428. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1609/ICWSM.V7I1.14429

[61] Kevin P. Murphy. 2023. Probabilistic machine learning: Advanced topics. MIT Press.

[62] Nic Newman, Richard Fletcher, Craig T. Robertson, A. Ross Arguedas, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2024. Reuters Institute digital news report 2024.

[63] Safiya Umoja Noble. 2020. Algorithms of Oppression. Algorithms of Oppression (December 2020).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.18574/NYU/9781479833641.001.0001

[64] Donald Norman. 2024. Design for a Better World: Meaningful, Sustainable, Humanity Centered. MIT Press.

[65] treme Right

and Online Recommender Systems. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 33, 4 (August 2015), 459 478.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314555329/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0894439314555329-FIG5.JPEG

[66] Andreas L. Opdahl, Bjørnar Tessem, Duc Tien Dang-Nguyen, Enrico Motta, Vinay Setty, Eivind Throndsen, Are Tverberg, and Christoph Trattner.

2023. Trustworthy journalism through AI. Data Knowl. Eng. 146, April (2023), 102182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2023.102182

[67] Sharon Oviatt. 2006. Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: Designing interfaces that help people think. Proc. 14th Annu. ACM Int.

Conf. Multimedia, MM 2006 (2006), 871 880. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1180639.1180831

[68] Ozlem Ozmen Garibay, Brent Winslow, Salvatore Andolina, Margherita Antona, Anja Bodenschatz, Constantinos Coursaris, Gregory Falco, Stephen

M. Fiore, Ivan Garibay, Keri Grieman, John C. Havens, Marina Jirotka, Hernisa Kacorri, Waldemar Karwowski, Joe Kider, Joseph Konstan, Sean

Koon, Monica Lopez-Gonzalez, Iliana Maifeld-Carucci, Sean McGregor, Gavriel Salvendy, Ben Shneiderman, Constantine Stephanidis, Christina

Strobel, Carolyn Ten Holter, and Wei Xu. 2023. Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges. Int. J. Human Computer Interact. 39,

3 (2023), 391 437. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320

[69] Sumit Pahwa and Nusrat Khan. 2022. Factors Affecting Emotional Resilience in Adults. Manag. Labour Stud. 47, 2 (May 2022), 216 232.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X211072935/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0258042X211072935-FIG1.JPEG

[70] Rock Yuren Pang, Sebastin Santy, René Just, and Katharina Reinecke. 2024. BLIP: Facilitating the Exploration of Undesirable Consequences of Digital

Technologies. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (May 2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642054/SUPPL_FILE/PN1128-

SUPPLEMENTAL-MATERIAL-1.PDF

[71]

[72] Jonathan Perry. 2021. Trust in Public Institutions: Trends and Implications for Economic Security. Aff. United Nations Dep. Econ. Soc. (July 2021).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.18356/27081990-108

[73] James Pierce. 2021. In tension with progression: Grasping the frictional tendencies of speculative, critical, and other alternative designs. In Conference

on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Association for Computing Machinery. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445406

[74] Amanda Ramsälv, Mats Ekström, and Oscar Westlund. 2023. The epistemologies of data journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221150439

(January 2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221150439

[75] Jeba Rezwana and Mary Lou Maher. 2023. User Perspectives on Ethical Challenges in Human-AI Co-Creativity: A Design Fiction Study. ACM Int.

Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2023), 62 74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3593364

[76] Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira. 2022. Recommender Systems Handbook: Third Edition. Recomm. Syst. Handb. Third Ed. (January

2022), 1 1060. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4

[77] Ronda Ringfort-Felner, Robin Neuhaus, Judith Dörrenbächer, Sabrina Großkopp, Dimitra Theofanou-fuelbier, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2023. Design

Fiction in a Corporate Setting a Case Study. In 14, 2023, 2093 2108.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596126

26[78] Francisco Javier Rodrigo-Ginés, Jorge Carrillo-de-Albornoz, and Laura Plaza. 2024. A systematic review on media bias detection: What is media bias,

how it is expressed, and how to detect it. Expert Syst. Appl. 237, (March 2024), 121641. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2023.121641

[79] Lambèr Royakkers, Jelte Timmer, Linda Kool, and Rinie van Est. 2018. Societal and ethical issues of digitization. Ethics Inf. Technol. 20, 2 (June 2018),

127 142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S10676-018-9452-X/TABLES/1

[80] Alan M. Rubin, Elizabeth M. Perse, and Robert A. Powell. 1985. Loneliness, Parasocial Interaction, And Local Television News Viewing. Hum.

Commun. Res. 12, 2 (December 1985), 155 180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2958.1985.TB00071.X

[81] Henrik Rydenfelt. 2022. Transforming media agency? Approaches to automation in Finnish legacy media. New Media Soc. 24, 12 (March 2022), 2598

2613. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821998705

[82] Henrik Rydenfelt, Lauri Haapanen, Jesse Haapoja, and Tuukka Lehtiniemi. 2024. Personalisation in Journalism: Ethical insights and blindspots in

Finnish legacy media. Journalism 25, 2 (November 2024), 313 333. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221138424

[83] Henrik Rydenfelt, Tuukka Lehtiniemi, Jesse Haapoja, and Lauri Haapanen. 2025. Autonomy and Algorithms: Tracing the Significance of Content

Personalization. Int. J. Commun. 19, 0 (January 2025), 20. Retrieved January 27, 2025 from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/23474

[84] Aljosha Karim Schapals, Colin Porlezza, and Rodrigo Zamith. 2020. Assistance or Resistance? Evaluating the Intersection of Automated Journalism

and Journalistic Role Conceptions. Media Commun. 8, 3 (July 2020), 16 26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17645/MAC.V8I3.3054

[85] Jordan Richard Schoenherr, Roba Abbas, Katina Michael, Pablo Rivas, and Theresa Dirndorfer Anderson. 2023. Designing AI Using a Human-

Centered Approach: Explainability and Accuracy Toward Trustworthiness. IEEE Trans. Technol. Soc. 4, 1 (March 2023), 9 23.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2023.3257627

[86] Rifat Ara Shams, · Didar Zowghi, and · Muneera Bano. 2023. AI and the quest for diversity and inclusion: a systematic literature review. AI Ethics

2023 (November 2023), 1 28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S43681-023-00362-W

[87] Donghee Shin and Shuhua Zhou. 2024. A Value and Diversity-Aware News Recommendation Systems: Can Algorithmic Gatekeeping Nudge Readers

to View Diverse News? Journal. Mass Commun. Q. (June 2024).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241246680/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_10776990241246680-FIG3.JPEG

[88] Felix M. Simon. 2024. Artificial Intelligence in the News: How AI Retools, Rationalizes, and Reshapes Journalism and the Public Arena. Columbia

Journalism Review. Retrieved August 29, 2024 from https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/artificial-intelligence-in-the-news.php

[89] Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2018. Intimate futures: Staying with the trouble of digital personal assistants through

design fiction. DIS 2018 - Proc. 2018 Des. Interact. Syst. Conf. (June 2018), 869 880.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196766/SUPPL_FILE/DISFP430.MP4

[90] Catherine Sotirakou and Constantinos Mourlas. 2016. A Gamified News Application for Mobile Devices: An Approach that Turns Digital News

Readers into Players of a Social Network. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 9599, (2016),

480 493. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40216-1_53

[91] [92] Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things. MIT Press.

Miriam Sturdee, Paul Coulton, Joseph G. Lindley, Mike Stead, Haider Ali Akmal, and Andy Hudson-Smith. 2016. Design fiction: How to build a

voight-kampff machine. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 07-12-May-, (May 2016), 375 385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892574

[93] Edson C. Tandoc and Soo Kwang Oh. 2017. Small Departures, Big Continuities? Journal. Stud. 18, 8 (August 2017), 997 1015.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1104260

[94] Neil Thurman, Seth C. Lewis, and Jessica Kunert. 2019. Algorithms, Automation, and News. Digit. Journal. 7, 8 (2019), 980 992.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1685395

[95] Tamás Tóth, Manuel Goyanes, Márton Demeter, and Francisco Campos-Freire. 2022. Social Implications of Paywalls in a Polarized Society:

Stud. Big Data 97, (2022), 169 179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-

88028-6_13

[96] Tommaso Turchi, Alessio Malizia, and Simone Borsci. 2024. Reflecting on Algorithmic Bias With Design Fiction: The MiniCoDe Workshops. IEEE

Intell. Syst. 39, 2 (March 2024), 40 50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2024.3352977

[97] tember 11, 2024

from https://books.google.com/books/about/Antisocial_Media.html?id=h05WDwAAQBAJ

[98] [99] Stephen J. Ward. 2019. Journalism ethics. In The handbook of journalism studies. Taylor & Francis, 307 323.

Stephen John Anthony Ward. 2015. The invention of journalism ethics: The path to objectivity and beyond. McGill- -MQUP.

[100] mated journalism.

Journalism 22, 1 (January 2021), 86 103. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918757072/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_1464884918757072-

FIG1.JPEG

[101] Richmond Y. Wong, Deirdre K. Mulligan, Ellen Van Wyk, James Pierce, and John Chuang. 2017. Eliciting values reflections by engaging privacy

futures using design workbooks. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 1, CSCW (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3134746

[102] Richmond Y Wong and Vera Khovanskaya. 2018. Speculative Design in HCI: From Corporate Imaginations to Critical Orientations. Comput. Interact.

2, (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10

[103] Nan Yu and Jun Kong. 2016. User experience with web browsing on small screens: Experimental investigations of mobile-page interface design and

homepage design for news websites. Inf. Sci. (Ny). 330, (February 2016), 427 443. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INS.2015.06.004

[104] Mi Zhou, Vibhanshu Abhishek, Timothy Derdenger, Jaymo Kim, and Kannan Srinivasan. 2024. Bias in Generative AI. (March 2024). Retrieved

January 23, 2025 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02726v1

27[105] John Zimmerman and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Research through design in HCI. In Ways of Knowing in HCI, Judith S. Olson and Wendy A. Kellogg (eds.).

Springer New York, New York, 167 189. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_8

3 notes · View notes