#cw: AI Art

[ai-art-thieves]

I have no issue dropping wolfharrows sock puppets. Feel free to post or just keep the info to yourself. Wolfharrows accounts are: hiltonfuckingsuicide, carltonbanksexperience, wolfharrow, virgogothic, antoniabishop, futchcassidy, lettemhavit, fortknoxious, butchkitk, and they also run the tjlc blog.

thanks for the info!

....wait what's the TJLC blog?

edit:

correction: one of these is actually spelled lettemhavitt and....

this post has gotten deleted from the blog

but they made a fatal error of reblogging it to one of their socks

here's all the botwork that they did:

if you are a fellow algorithmancer or are more familiar with ai art, let me know what model this is

[springdayautumnmoon]

NEW VIDEO - The Digital Horror of AI Upscaling

[magicalmysteryperson]

Not a Robbie Williams lyric video this time.

But what it does contain is my fears in regards to generative AI.

[pinkiepig]

I wanted to draw a cool tiger from someone’s dream 🐅

(Link to the original poster)

[amogus-real-not-clickbait]

ignore the green im not a native speaker idk what it means

also theres a hidden amogus in there somewhere idk

[mortalitasiquyen]

the maker sent me a vision lol

[gattsuru]

To be fair, I'm pretty skeptic that "Quentin Kilgore" and his readers have a lot of overlap with people complaining about monstersgirls that look too normal and cute, anymore than they're the ones that realize how unrealistic breasts larger than a character's head is. The class exists and can sometimes be pretty shameless, but some people just have vanilla tastes.

I've absolutely love to see some monsterfuckery isekai haremlit as one of the poor bastards that thinks the genre is badly underexplored (and maybe throw in some bisexuals, please?), but there's a reason that the closest examples I can think of before hitting plain furry porn is just Contention (cw: unfinished, 'non-elf' in the sense of having four arms). In addition to the simple 'wow I can't believe there's chickens in this chicken coop' problem, if someone wanted a lot of phenotype variety they're a lot more likely to get pulled to the conventions of furry or horror media to start with.

I find a lot of anti-elf posturing in fantasy pretty lame because people will shit on elves and then draw orc and goblin women looking like this:

[ieilaf]

OOOUuOOoAaooouuuu Some doodles I made! :D

In the second last art was originally 3Ds backgrounds I wanted to mod on my 3Ds but it took awhile but I'm really happy with how it turned out :D

In the last one I drew what if Benery interacted with Gordon and i was just happy with the drawing the silly guys! ٠ن٠

[120daysofsodomm]

ffo_art

[frozensoldier-png]

Hydra

⛔️Please, don’t repost my art on Pinterest,Facebook, Tumblr or other similar platforms without my permission.⛔️

[ai-art-thieves]

I knew we had to talk about this at some point.

See this picture?

This is ai generated.

You want to know how I can tell?

Gobbledygook.

I have waddled around the halls of Chat-GPT's image generator "Sora", so my eyes have been thoroughly prepared for this.

Here's more images like this so you can train your eyes like I have.

@slenbee, @is-it-ai-art, if you can confirm my findings, that would be awesome.

[antiquechatterbox]

feeling funny after eating the big anchovy ⚠️⚠️

[magicalmysteryperson]

I ask Dalle 3 to draw every single Pokémon in the pokedex and I grade it on accuracy to show that us artists still have hope in not getting replaced, but we still need to keep fighting. (pt 1)

1. Bulbasaur

Understood the assignment. Overall basic idea of bulbasaur has been expressed. Spot placement is loose and generalized. 3/4 of them do not have fangs. Some of their eyes are not the right color. All of them have pupils, which is not a trait found in Bulbasaurs but I'll allow it for the style that they are using. As a cute bulbasaur render, it passes.

Grade: B+ (probably nightshade your bulbasaurs)

2. Ivysaur

Is slowly starting to lose the plot. Most of the time, the ivysaurs generated by the algorithm are either bulbasaurs with buds, ivysaurs with bloomed flowers, or an in-between of ivysaur and venusaur. Flower isn't even the right kind. And some of them become bipedal with tails?? the fudge? And there are too many flowers in the background. The composition is starting to become cluttered.

Upon giving it the bulbapedia description of its physical appearance, it was a little more accurate. However, the leaves are all wrong and it still suffers from too many spots syndrome. One even had really thin pupils.

Grade (without full description): D Grade (with full description): C (you probably don't need to nightshade your ivysaurs, but seeing the next pokemon... yeah you should probably do that.)

3. Venusaur

Horrible. Absolute failure. This is just a bigger bulbasaur with ivysaur's colors and venusaur's plant.

With description is even worse. Nice rendering, but as a representation of Venusaur, it fails spectacularly. Still a bunch of Ivysaurs. With too many spots. And none of those flowers are remotely accurate.

Grade: F (for both of them. Venusaur fans, you are safe. Bulbasaur and Ivysaur fans, though? Nightshade them to hell and back.)

4. Charmander

Proportionally it needs to a be a little thinner, but other than that? Very scarily accurate, random Pokémon gobbledygook not withstanding.

Grade: A (nightshade your charmanders)

5. Charmeleon

Asked for Charmeleon, ended up with some bulbasaur/charmander/charizard fusions. Which is nice, but its not what I asked for. Failed automatically.

Is better with the physical description, but it still has some issues. It's not the right color of red, some of them are quadrupeds, and there are dark greyish brown spots which the description did not have. The cream scales also extend to its mouth, which is also not what the original charmeleon had. Points for originality (well, as original as an algorithm that scrapes images can get), but this is still not going to get a high grade.

Also nice crab claw flame.

Grade (without description): F

Grade (with description): C-

6. Charizard

Also understood the assignment. Aside from the flaming tail and some wing bone coloring issues, this is a really accurate representation of a Charizard. It sometimes fails in the proportion department, but 9 times out of 10 it poops out a charizard that doesn't look janky. Though considering that Charizard is one of those really big Pokémons, of course its going to get that right.

Grade: A+ (Nightshade your charizards)

7. Squirtle

If it wasn't for the machine's struggle with the tail, we would have another A+ on our hands. Which is a scary thing to think about.

Grade: A (Nightshade your squirtles)

8. Wartortle

The one time it actually got Squirtle's tail right, and it was in the section where the AI struggles to generate a Wartortle with only its name to go by. Just a bunch of bigger squirtles that sometimes go quadrupedal and have blastoise ears.

With description is slightly better, but it still fails. All of them are quads, some of them have blastoise mouth, and one even has a mane. The tail isn't accurate either, but then again the cohost designer has a character limit. Even without a character limit, I'm still gonna grade it negatively. Especially since it has ignored the bipedal part of the description.

Grade (without description): F (seriously. nightshade your squirtles.)

Grade (with description): D

9. Blastoise

Appears to understand the assignment, but it only understands the overall body plan. We got tangents and multiple guns galore. And Blastoise.... holding guns?? The fu-?

Also, Dalle 3 does not know how to pixel art. Pixel artists, you have been spared.

With description, it fairs a little bit better... from a distance. 3/4 of the blastoises have malformed hands, the white shell outlines do not wrap around the arms like a backpack, (which some of the gun toting blastoises actually got right!) and one of the images' ears are too big.

Grade (without description): C-

Grade (with description): B- (Best to nightshade your Squirtles and Blastoises)

[bananafire11]

Hi tumblr have more of the clown

[itz-pandora]

CW Vomiting

Yeah uhhh guess who remembered they can play around with cyber corruption and make Sonic Ultra Pathetic™

[sp3ncer]

my lovely brain thought up the perfect name: benrey? bill? benadryl