#detect ai

[genuflectx]

Guessing Whether a Song is AI or Human (guess for a 🍪)

I think I've found the general (albeit, unlikely to ever be 100% accurate) way to guess whether a song is AI or human via its spectrogram- something you can look at easily for free with Audacity.

I made an image with AI on the left and human on the right and think it makes a handy guide to compare other spectrograms to. Comes with normal, reversed, and a black and white (contrast slightly increased) version. Feel free to steal it and use.

AI songs tend to have more purple/orange at the top and less bright yellow at the bottom, i.e. "muddled" looking. Out of 10 AI and 10 human sampled songs of varied genres this pattern holds up relatively well.

Let's see if we can get this to hold up by looking at unlabeled spectrograms and placing them either as AI or human using these images. I tested this on two friends and 1 got it right and 1 only missed 1 >:3 If you get them all right you get cookies ;3 I'll put the answers in the replies after a while. Click read more to play :D

hint: look at the bottoms of the spectrograms, they tend to provide more accuracy than the tops. Compare them to the provide charts.

[noterkgk]

Impression

[fisherrprince]

I’ve been possessed. If anyone wants to know where Edgeworth is, he’s been watching kamen yaiba with the detective boys for 4 hours

[8pxl]

I know this isnt the purpose of your bloc but youre way better at spotting this but @seanerrr 's pixel art is giving red flags to me and i wanted to know what you thought

no worries, it can be really difficult to spot the inconsistencies especially when they’re trying soooo hard to fake it lmao.

but to answer: they use AI and are trying very hard to pass it off as real (importing to aseprite, half ‘finished’ pieces, describes their ‘process’ etc. truly pathetic. but here’s the signs:

like look at this mushed up slop trying to pass as pixels, nothing is intentionally placed, the pixel sizes are so inconsistent, some blur into other pixels, it’s just a mess. the one on the right is their older art and is also very obviously ai. you can also see hugely different jumps in styles which isn’t always a sign but with the others just cements it more.

the pathetic attempt to explain their process is also magnificent, the ‘hours of thoughtful work’ line takes me out lmaoooo. anyways he describes his process and its inconsistent with actual pixel art, which most pixel artist can tell right away whats wrong (i don’t expect more people to see the red flags but they’re there and huge) if interested in knowing whats wrong you can DM me i don’t wanna help the grifter get better at lying 😤

[amalasdraws]

https://www.tumblr.com/bigmammallama5/732632789726478336?source=share do you have any tips on how to detect ai and deepfakes?

Good question and I'm gonna be honest, it's not always easy and it will only get harder and harder. I'm just an artist who has spent their personal time to dive into this topic and study images. I'm still learning and there is a lot I don't know. But let me show what I know. This will be long, but I will make a summary at the end! So far, even with ai having become better and better there are still almost always some things wrong with an image, and they all have a very specific look to them. So let me try to show you some and point out some of them.

As we all know, a biggest struggle ai had were hands. And even though here and there we still see messed up hands, I say "had", because the hands is actual a good example on how ai is improving and will only get better. Still, looking at pictures that show more hands is always worth it, because somewhere in the back there will be most likely at least one messed up hand.

Another issue a lot of ai still has is hair though!

It's very obvious still in many ai "drawings" and in those otherwise well rendered portraits. Hair starts to blend with the ears a lot, or with the clothes.

There is also often this very odd look between something too sharp and way too blurry

There is often a very specific texture to the hair. I actually do not know the artistic or specific name for it. I can only describe it as this weird sharp feeling that makes it look oddly pixely, and then you have areas where it's very blurry. And the kind of loops and almost flame like looking hair we see in the last pic out of the three here is also something very common with ai.

As an artist I know we make mistakes too! The way I draw hair is flawed too! But it's not only that it's flawed here, but it's following always the same pattern and falls into the same issues over and over again, no matter who is "creating" the image. Those flame like loops are a common one, next to the odd blends and weird sharp and blurry textures.

But ai is getting better, and we not only have "art" and something that tries to be a drawing/painting, but photos too.

A lot of those "photos" have a very specific texture and look to them! Again, it's not always the mistakes, but the very specific optic too. A lot of the images are oddly smooth, too rendered, with always blurry backgrounds. And when you look closer at the background you will see the mistakes! The crowd behind Jesus is a hot mess once you look closer. Bob Marley's hair has the same issue than I described before. Lincoln is surrounded by people with messed up hands and don't even get me started on the faces behind Caesar.

So a lot of ai images look alright on a first and quick glance, but as more time you spend with them, as more mistakes you will notice. The wehre is Waldo of ai horror.

And those "photos" shared here are still very obvious. Not just the mistakes and messed up details but the very specific aesthetic too.

Those images get better and better and as less details you have, as less mistakes you have!

With photos like this it becomes harder and harder. There are not many details and no hands. Not many mistakes can be made. Also the very obvious plastic looking smoothness isn't so much here anymore. It kinda still is...but differently. And always the blurry background!! Sometimes the hair is still a giveaway. Collars and clothe straps are also often still a giveaway upon close look. As is jewelry. Earrings will be different and necklaces often don't go all the way around, just end, or blend with the hair or clothes.

Often details on jewelry is also blurry and not shown properly. This is a trick with many details. With jewelry, batches, hair, ears, text. So it's often blurred out and not shown properly because ai doesn't know what to really show here.

It's often really just the small details and when we scroll down quickly we will miss them. Like the wedding ring on the middle finger, the pens on top of a closed pocket, the batches that are always blurry, messed up faces that blend with a blurry background.

And sometimes it's so subtle that I could only really tell that right is the ai image in comparison to the real photo on the left. The real photo shows hands clearly and even when things are blurred out it doesn't feel that it's done to hide things. The ai image on the right hides the hands. There is also a very dead look in the eyes :D

And here I could only tell because the text in the back doesn't make sense. Even blurred out we should be able to make out something here

And after seeing a lot of ai images I recognize the kind of blurred out bg in combination with a very smooth and well rendered foreground/characters.

And here the only giveaway is a closer look at the backgrounds as well

To summarize it:

Ai and fake news rely on a fast living world. We are being bombarded with tons of information and messages daily and we scroll past quickly. But the best tool, for now, in detecting ai is taking our time! Those images get better and better but so far there are still always some things off!! Especially in the background!

Hair. Often weirdly smoothed out and oddly sharp at the same time

Hair often blends with the ears or the clothes

Details are blurred out.

Jewelry doesn't match (example earrings). Details on metal often blurred out and never shown. Necklaces blend with hair or the clothes, and don't go around the neck.

Background is always blurred out.

In this blurred mess there are often hidden very messed up faces and/or hands.

A very specific smooth and yet too sharp/too rendered aesthetic combines with an always blurry bg.

Text, especialyl in the background, is not legible and doesn't make sense.

Backgrounds are often (so far) the dead giveaway. Somewhere in the back things become muddled and messed up. This shows also very well in ai decor/architecture. There will be odd lines that don't align or align too well. Curtain poles that end in the furniture, a plant that is behind a lamp suddenly having leaves in front of the lamp. As longer you look as more you will notice.

Conclusion:

Take your time with images! Sit with them! Especially when it's framed as important and political news. Is it ai and propaganda, or did it really happen? Don't fall for the quick buzz and outrage! Some things are obvious right away but with others you have to take your time. And it's time you have! If you are still unsure if a pic is real or not, do some research on top. Image reverse search. Can you find it anywhere else? Are other news outlets sharing it? Does the image/message make sense? For example there is now a deepfake of Bella Hadid voicing support for Israel. Ask yourself, does this make sense? If it feels out of line compared to previous behavior, do some research! Media literacy is not just as being able to recognize a fake or real right away, but being able to do research. To question things! Don't just take every post online for face value. Even when shared by a mutual you trust. They might have been tricked!

There are so many information online and it's great to have access to so information, but it's also difficult to wade through all of it. Media and truth are a weapon and it's being twisted and bend used to manipulate. Always has! But ai and so many people being able to post and share things, it becomes bigger and bigger and more dangerous. So don't just take everything that is handed to you and share it further no questions asked. Media literacy and being able to think for ourselves and do the research is important!! And as research becomes harder and harder, as sources are being messed up with ai and other fake news, it's even more important to sit with the images and study them. See the flaws, the mistakes. Compare it to other news and images.

This got long, and I started to ramble at the end. Sorry But I hope this helped

[zerogps03]

Detect Ai

Professional writers, students, educators, freelancers, copywriters ... alike trust ZeroGPT to detect text's source whether it derives from AI tools (like ChatGPT, Google Bard, ...) or human brain. Once you enter the text in the box and then click on the “Detect Text” button to get started. We will start analyzing your text with a series of complex and deep algorithms. These algorithms are developed by ZeroGPT's team and they are backed by our in-house experiments and some highly reputable papers already published. GPT-4, ChatGPT & AI Detector by ZeroGPT: detect OpenAI text

Detect Ai

[onsukun]

just a girl

[wingsoutforshin]

haibara and her ayumi shaped blind spot

[faynke]

I think she'd say things just to piss him off.

[nanoko857]

They took a new photo to include her and Agasa T-T

[daiwild]

top 10 worst eyeballs EVER (aitsf roleswap where literally nothing in the dynamic changes)

[joyed4ever]

30 seconds in and out 30 seconds in and out

[halflifebutawesome]

I am a good person. I am a powerful person, I don't believe in evil. I think that evil is an idea created by others to avoid dealing with their own nature. I understand my own nature, good and evil have nothing to do with it.

[detcofan4869]

Now this feels right... ❤️

Disclaimer: Art is NOT MINE !

[hachimitsujpg]

they're communicating

[clownakai]

Tag yourself <3