#hotbutton

[hotbuttonin]

Look cool and casual in this hot button round naeck half sleeve navy tshirt. It's perfect for everyday wear, and can be dressed up or down.

[annebrontesrequiem]

Online discourse is so funny people will unironically go "Actually everyone in real life thinks [something that no one in real life has ever thought]"

[amrv-5]

Making a shirt to wear to family holidays that says "If you comment on how much / little I am eating / my body / say anything about calories / deservingness / food guilt etc. I will kill myself in front of you badly and then come back from the dead and kill you also and badly and then kill myself again. badly" and on the back there's a more calmly- and encouragingly-phrased list of resources on deconstructing diet culture for beginners

[lumsel]

what about agender people? tsk, so oppressive.

"Does agender qualify as a type of non-binary", the greatest thread in the history of forums,

[leebrontide]

Maybe this month I should do an update on the frankly scifi state of medical data privacy laws/practices/threats here in the US. Since that's both a major theme of my books and a perennially topical hotbutton issue. The last one I wrote was 3 years ago, and you can read it here.

Some wild shit has gone down since then.

[best-overplayed-song]

Re: Take Me To Church in response to anon-- a take by someone who first heard it a bit After it came out at the age of 20, was concerned it was overhyped, and on listening had to admit that it was in fact good. (Also disclaimer, I've got less context about like, Irish/English history and stuff than OP so uhhhh sorry this is just gonna be my own personal vibecheck)

Tw: sex mention.

A lot of my feelings on the song are more related to this bit: Take me to church I'll worship like a dog at the shrine of your lies I'll tell you my sins, and you can sharpen your knife Offer me that deathless death and revolve around a. Possibly more sexual interpretation, so take that as you will (I was horny at 20 what can I say)

Okay first off let's talk about Why Church Is Horny. Religion and sex are both things that people often have a lot of feelings about. Christians specifically have even more feelings about sex, usually because they're saying it's bad. However, from a Catholic perspective, there's often a LOT of erotic imagery and stuff going on behind the scenes. See: lactating Jesus, saints' mysticism (for instance, Theresa of Avila, Catherine of Siena), and honestly just general medieval saints… people were SO horny for God. Plus, from an anti-sex Christian perspective, stuff still gets horny more often than you'd think. Milton was a Puritan, and that doesn't stop Paradise Lost from having originated Sexy Satan as a trope. All of which boils down to, coming from Christian, English-speaking cultural context a lot of your feelings about sex and religion, both of which carry enough baggage on their own, become intertwined.

So. All of that means you get the invocation of Christian stuff in the Bedroom anyway--lots of people say stuff like 'oh god' during sex, for instance. Think about the popularity too of the sexy nun trope, or even Destiel. A lot of people find desecration of the (Christian) holy, hot as shit, though it remains taboo.

For that reason! "Take Me To Church" being a song about sex?? About a woman referred to as a "lover," not a wife? Sex as worship? Get all those cultural hotbuttons pinged. (And that's just the first line we're looking at.)

I'll worship like a dog at the shrine of your lies Hoo boy. So, again, worship = sex? That's a lot as seen above. Invoking the dog imagery as part of deference to a woman also gets into stuff about gender roles, taboos, and the breaking thereof. There's a lot to unpack here-- deference of a man to a woman, of an animal to the holy, the admission that it is a shrine of lies, and tied into all that is the implied desire and consent to do these things. That's sexy!

I'll tell you my sins, and you can sharpen your knife Shame is a strong feeling-- one that comes up a lot when we look at this religion/sex network. Telling of sins evokes the Catholic sacrament of confession. And then we get to the knife. I don't know how to explain my interpretation of this without getting real kinky so uh, let's just say that pain and blood can have significant associations with both Christianity and sexuality, and the use of the knife thing in this context brings in Yet Another hot-button thing.

Offer me that deathless death I always just interpret this as euphemism for an orgasm. But! That's not to belittle it. Could a deathless death also be an assumption to heaven? In the context of the previous line(s), it takes on so many alternate connotations it's insane. Has he been stabbed for his sins? (That carried penetration imagery with it fyi.) Has he been forgiven his sins and gets to go to heaven? Or is it sexual release? With the ambiguity the song leaves, all three are possible, keeping up all those threads of violence/pain, shame, ecstasy, sex, divinity, submission… there's A LOT here.

Anyway I'm gonna stop there cuz this is too long. I don't even like this song THAT much, I'm just here to explain why people do.

OH YEAH AND PS: ADD TO ALL OF THIS THE SHAME/RELIGION/SEX FEELINGS AND ASSOCIATIONS CAUSED BY THE LISTENER BEING QUEER okay bye

I loved reading your interpretation! Thanks for the breakdown!

[mote-of-ash]

uhhh ive got like one option to get scrip'd for legit HRT through galileo health and if that falls through i think ill just have to try fuckin' DIY.

its definitely been helpful getting meds in the past but that was for things that werent so hotbutton

[kabutoraiger]

Bit surprised you picked up on the feeling like educational special thing that early. Iirc Fence was commissioned to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Okinawa being released from US occupation and returned to Japan. The drama’s still pretty good imo but uh, the educational PSA aspect’s gonna get a little worse from hereon

so THAT'S the behind the scenes fence lore. now that you say it i'm like oh duh, of course that was the purpose behind this.

it's a little too bad bc i feel like a more classically told narrative drama with these elements would be so refreshing & good & unique, like maybe an all-timer for me, but on the other hand like. these are definitely worthy topics to be getting an education on via a well-shot and acted tv program.

my ass would learn so much history & culture if i could watch a nogi akiko show about every notable event & hotbutton issue...

[shadowmaat]

Fascinating

Sitting in on the candidate elections live Q&As for That Fic Place has been interesting. There is a definite hyperfocus on the types of questions folks ask the candidates. So far nearly every question (other than softballs about pets and favorite fics) has been about harassment, burnout, and diversity issues. All very important questions, of course, but it gets a bit... repetitive after a while.

I then made the mistake of submitting a question, myself. One that wasn't focused on the hotbutton topics, but which has been brought up in the more "official" questioning periods. All I wanted to know is what areas they felt needed focusing on to help improve the stability of the Archive and how they'd go about making that happen.

MASSIVE downvotes. Like, 25+ downvotes from the audience. To the point where the mods decided not to ask it to the candidates. I'm just a little mystified about why everyone hated it. It it because it didn't fit their narrow parameters of what's "important" to discuss? Do they think that's beyond the scope of what's expected from the candidates (though if so, why have an earlier question about it)? Do people not want the Archive to be more robust and stable?

It's honestly a little discouraging. It was a good faith question about an issue I'm interested in and that has immediate relevance to the Archive. I don't think I'll bother participating anymore if there's going to be such a tenacious resistance to "outside" questions.

[fallowhearth]

Last night I had a nightmare that I'd made a mostly joking post referencing some niche topic going around, and it was reblogged by Will Wheaton of all people, with commentary implying that I was making a serious and very bad point about some other hotbutton issue.

I'm so glad I'm an unpopular microblogger.

[paulgadzikowski]

People who won't vote for Harris on account of Palestine, or who would if she changed her position on Palestine, are hotbutton single-issue voters same as conservatives who won't vote for any candidate who supports abortion. They're not progressives, they're leftist deplorables.

The discussions around whether or not to vote for Kamala keep being dominated by very loud voices shouting that anyone who advocates for her “just doesn't care about Palestine!” and “is willing to overlook genocide!” and “has no moral backbone at all!” And while some of these voices will be bots, trolls, psyops - we know that this happens; we know that trying to persuade progressives to split the vote or not vote at all is a strategy employed by hostile actors - of course many of them won't be. But what this rhetoric does is continually force the “you should vote for her” crowd onto the back foot of having to go to great lengths writing entire essays justifying their choice, while the “don't vote/vote third party” crowd is basically never asked to justify their choice. It frames voting for Kamala as a deeply morally compromised position that requires extensive justification while framing not voting or voting third party as the neutral and morally clean stance.

So here's another way of looking at it. How much are you willing to accept in order to feel like you're not compromising your morals on one issue?

Are you willing to accept the 24% rise in maternal deaths - and 39% increase for Black women - that is expected under a federal abortion ban, according to the Centre for American Progress? Those percentages represent real people who are alive now who would die if the folks behind Project 2025 get their way with reproductive healthcare.

Are you willing to accept the massive acceleration of climate change that would result from the scrapping of all climate legislation? We don't have time to fuck around with the environment. A gutting of climate policy and a prioritisation of fossil fuel profits, which is explicitly promised by Trump, would set the entire world back years - years that we don't have.

Are you willing to accept the classification of transgender visibility as inherently “pornographic” and thus the removal of trans people from public life? Are you willing to accept the total elimination of legal routes for gender-affirming care? The people behind the Trump campaign want to drive queer and trans people back underground, back into the closet, back into “criminality”. This will kill people. And it's maddening that caring about this gets called “prioritising white gays over brown people abroad” as if it's not BIPOC queer and trans Americans who will suffer the most from legislative queer- and transphobia, as they always do.

Are you willing to accept the domestic deployment of the military to crack down on protests and enforce racist immigration policy? I'm sure it's going to be very easy to convince huge numbers of normal people to turn up to protests and get involved in political organising when doing so may well involve facing down an army deployed by a hardcore authoritarian operating under the precedent that nothing he does as president can ever be illegal.

Are you willing to accept a president who openly talks about wanting to be a dictator, plans on massively expanding presidential powers, dehumanises his political enemies and wants the DOJ to “go after them”, and assures his supporters they won't have to vote again? If you can't see the danger of this staring you right in the face, I don't know what to tell you. Allowing a wannabe dictator to take control of the most powerful country on earth would be absolutely disastrous for the entire world.

Are you willing to accept an enormous uptick in fascism and far-right authoritarianism worldwide? The far right in America has huge influence over an entire international network of “anti-globalists”, hardcore anti-immigrant xenophobes, transphobic extremists, and straight-up fascists. Success in America aids and emboldens these people everywhere.

Are you willing to accept an enormous number of preventable deaths if America faces a crisis in the next four years: a public health emergency, a natural disaster, an ecological catastrophe? We all saw how Trump handled Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico. We all saw how Trump handled Covid-19. He fanned the flames of disaster with a constant flow of medical misinformation and an unspeakably dangerous undermining of public health experts. It's estimated that 40% of US pandemic deaths could have been avoided if the death rates had corresponded to those in other high-income countries. That amounts to nearly half a million people. One study from January 2021 estimated between around 4,200 and 12,200 preventable deaths attributable purely to Trump's statements about masks. We're highly unlikely to face another global pandemic in the next few years but who knows what crises are coming down the pipeline?

Are you willing to accept the attempted deportation of millions - millions - of undocumented people? This is “rounding people up and throwing them into camps where no one ever hears from them again” territory. That's a blueprint for genocide right there and it's a core tenet of both Trump's personal policy and Project 2025. And of course they wouldn't be going after white people. They most likely wouldn't even restrict their tyranny to people who are actually undocumented. Anyone racially othered as an “immigrant” would be at risk from this.

Are you willing to accept not just the continuation of the current situation in Palestine, but the absolute annihilation of Gaza and the obliteration of any hope for imminent peace? There is no way that Trump and the people behind him would not be catastrophically worse for Gaza than Kamala or even Biden. Only recently he was telling donors behind closed doors that he wanted to “set the [Palestinian] movement back 25 or 30 years” and that “any student that protests, I throw them out of the country”. This is not a man who can be pushed in a direction more conducive to peace and justice. This is a man who listens to his wealthy donors, his Christian nationalist Republican allies, and himself.

Are you willing to accept a much heightened risk of nuclear war? Obviously this is hardly a Trump policy promise. But I can't think of a single president since the Cold War who is more likely to deploy nuclear weapons, given how casually he talks about wanting to use them and how erratic and unstable he can be in his dealings with foreign leaders. To quote Foreign Policy only this year, “Trump told a crowd in January that one of the reasons he needed immunity was so that he couldn’t be indicted for using nuclear weapons on a city.” That's reassuring. I'm not even in the US and I remember four years of constant background low-level terror that Trump would take offence at something some foreign leader said or think that he needs to personally intervene in some military situation to “sort it out” and decide to launch the entire world into nuclear war. No one sane on earth wants the most powerful person on the planet to be as trigger-happy and careless with human life as he is, especially if he's running the White House like a dictator with no one ever telling him no. But depending on what Americans do in November, he may well be inflicted again on all of us, and I guess we'll all just have to hope that he doesn't do the worst thing imaginable.

“But I don't want those things! Stop accusing me of supporting things I don't support!” Yes, of course you don't want those things. None of us does. No one's saying that you actively support them. No one's accusing you of wanting Black women to die from ectopic pregnancies or of wanting to throw Hispanic people in immigrant detention centres or of wanting trans people to be outlawed (unlike, I must point out, the extremely emotive and personal accusations that get thrown around about “wanting Palestinian children to die” if you encourage people to vote for Kamala).

But if you're advocating against voting for Kamala, you are clearly willing to accept them as possible consequences of your actions. That is the deal you're making. If a terrible thing happening is the clear and easily foreseeable outcome of your action (or in the case of not voting, inaction), in a way that could have been prevented by taking a different and just as easy action, you are partly responsible for that consequence. (And no, it's not “a fear campaign” to warn people about things he's said, things he wants to do, and plans drawn up by his close allies. This is not “oooh the Democrats are trying to bully you into voting for them by making him out to be really bad so you'll feel scared and vote for Kamala!” He is really bad, in obvious and documented and irrefutable ways.)

And if you believe that “both parties are the same on Gaza” (which, you know, they really aren't, but let's just pretend that they are) then presumably you accept that the horrors being committed there will continue, in the immediate term anyway, regardless of who wins the presidency. Because there really isn't some third option that will appear and do everything we want. It's going to be one of those two. And we can talk all day about wanting a better system or how unfair it is that every presidential election only ever has two viable candidates and how small the Overton window is and all that but hell, we are less than eighty days out from the election; none of that is going to get fixed between now and November. Electoral reform is a long-term (but important!) goal, not something that can be effected in the span of a couple of months by telling people online to vote third party. There is no “instant ceasefire and peace negotiation” button that we're callously overlooking by encouraging people to vote for Kamala. (My god, if there was, we would all be pressing it.)

If we're suggesting people vote for her, it's not that we “are willing to overlook genocide” or “don't care about sacrificing brown people abroad” or whatever. Nothing is being “overlooked” here. It's that we're simply not willing to accept everything else in this post and more on top of continued atrocities in Gaza. We're not willing to take Trump and his godawful far-right authoritarian agenda as an acceptable consequence of feeling like we have the moral high ground on Palestine. I cannot stress enough that if Kamala doesn't win, we - we all, in the whole world - get Trump. Are you willing to accept that?

And one more point to address: I've seen too many people act frighteningly flippant and naïve about terrible things Trump or his campaign want to do, with the idea that people will simply be able to prevent all these bad things by “organising” and “protesting” and “collective action”. “I'm not willing to accept these things; that's why I'll fight them tooth and nail every day of their administration” - OK but if you're not even willing to cast a vote then I have doubts about your ability to form “the Resistance”, which by the way would have to involve cooperation with people of lots of progressive political stripes in order to have the manpower to be effective, and if you're so committed to political purity that you view temporarily lending your support to Kamala at the ballot box as an untenable betrayal of everything you stand for then forgive me for also doubting your ability to productively cooperate with allies on the ground with whom you don't 100% agree. Plus, if the Trump campaign gets its way, American progressives would be kept so busy trying to put out about twenty different fires at once that you'd be able to accomplish very little. Maybe you get them to soften their stance on trans healthcare but oh shit, the climate policies are still in place. But more importantly, how many people do you think will protest for abortion rights if doing so means staring down a gun? Or organise to protect their neighbours from deportation if doing so means being thrown in prison yourself? And OK, maybe you're sure that you will, but history has shown us time and time again that most people won't. Most people aren't willing to face that kind of personal risk. And a tiny number of lefties willing to risk incarceration or death to protect undocumented people or trans people or whatever other groups are targeted is sadly not enough to prevent the horrors from happening. That is small fry compared to the full might of a determined state. Of course if the worst happens and Trump wins then you should do what you can to mitigate the harm; I'm not saying you shouldn't. But really the time to act is now. You have an opportunity right here to mitigate the harm and it's called “not letting him get elected”. Act now to prevent that kind of horrific authoritarian situation from developing in the first place; don't sit this one out under the naïve belief that “we'll be able to stop it if it happens”. You won't.

[hotbuttonin]

Looking for a hot button full-sleeve henley neck solid yellow t-shirt for men? Look no further! This t-shirt is made from 100% cotton and features a relaxed fit. It's perfect for a casual day out or a night on the town.

[leanstooneside]

YOU SAY MYANMAR, I SAY BURMA

- lifted Charles

- faithbased Charles

- gibberish Charles

- ensconced Charles

- stolen Charles

- operating Charles

- hotbutton Charles

- uneasy Charles

- openended Charles

- Brethren Charles

- enamel Charles

- disdainful Charles

- commonplace Charles

- longsuffering Charles

- forehand Charles

- sexier Charles

- complementary Charles

- fading Charles

- hissy Charles

- enlisted Charles

- groaning Charles

- succeeding Charles

- mixed Charles

- disparate Charles

- conditioned Charles

- sleepless Charles

- unaided Charles

- unsupervised Charles

[nx08h63bitchyobservationnerd]

porn for hwe

Live Sex Sex Cams avatreatsss Photo 60 avatreatsss avaxreyess Nude Leaked OnlyFans Photo 60 avatreatsss avaxreyess UNDRESS AI Previous preschool christmas crafts christmas craft ideas for kids easy christmas crafts to make gifts for newborn baby girl barbie doll makeup game gift lifeoflizalesedi Models melise ellieprincess bubbles199 ellieparkerfree news prisontiktok chris chinup viralvideo cats JaNell McIntosh May 162018 i started my locjourney locsoftiktok Big Beach Rottweilers A Legacy of Winning since 2008 A Rottweiler Breeder of Merit Preservation Breeder Jordyn Woods Says Boyfriend KarlAnthony Towns Is Always In Her Corner After Announcing Her OnlyFans httpdlvritRjm24M No photo description activities on purpose National Center for Educational Statistics Discord Facebook and Twitch Tweens who were cyberbullied shared that John and Melanie Clarke Country Home Center Marclay Davis Winston A Lynn P Altadonna Gary L Anderson Rufus Ansley Stew and Becky Arnold Happy birthday Auntie Em We on the way I love this Come on man Oh See full profile in the app Enjoy photos videos and more from ludacris Open Instagram OnlyFans kellykaishx kelly kaish kellykaishx Undress AI kelly kaish kellykaishx Nude Leaks OnlyFans Photo 23 Previous

Posted in the ujosue61w community Hotbutton operating agreement provisions 2 Navigating transfer and exit Ahmed Baladi is a partner in the Paris office of Gibson Dunn Weather Underground provides local longrange weather forecasts weatherreports maps tropical weather conditions for the It features all Authors Review Angel wing tattoos are super in when it comes to RIP tattoo designs This includes the pain and hand tattoos are painful because of Bhad Bhabie aka Bhadbhabie OnlyFans I know yall want to subscribe to my bad bich friend milamontexo look how bad she is go check o Made With Help Center Help Center Find your tickets Contact your event 18 Savannah St Free Backstreet Community Arts Save this event Van Gogh

Jaclyn Frank jaclynglenn on TikTok 26M Likes 1166K Followers Aka Jaclyn Frank aka mommy Find me at JaclynVlogs on YouTube FedEx Office Print Ship Center 2456 Richmond Ave New York 10314 1 Near Me Listing Directions Businesses Near Me Restaurants Near Me Elizabeth Frances Henstridge born 11 September 1987 is an English actress and model She starred as Jemma Simmons in the ABC superhero action Watch Jesstoofresh Leaked Onlyfans Porn Videos Free 4k Sex reilly sanders nude Reilly sanders onlyfans Nudes pics by cannellonipetrelsparrow released 22 August 2024 Super Daddy Bear birthday card featuring a super daddy bear and his cubs Choose from 1 2 or 3 cubs The perfect birthday card to send to onlyfanscom OnlyFans OnlyFans is the social platform revolutionizing creator and fan connections The site is inclusive of artists and content Home Hot Log In Sign Up Trending OnlyFans Videos Random Top Models by Likes Top Models by Followers Popular Videos new Share rate and discuss pictures of Marina Squerciatis feet on wikiFeet the most comprehensive celebrity feet database to ever have existed Does Frosthaven have opportunity attacks If a player character moves pastaround or away from an enemy does that enemy get a free attack And if so

jackknife Finnegan jackknifefinnegan The weekly update in GTA 5 Online October 10th shoutout to GTA GFX gta5 gta5online gtaweeklyupdate Shaen Barletta Directors Monica Carpanese Dario Germani Writer Monica Carpanese All cast crew Production box office more at British babe Milf Full nude pictures Dick rates Sexting Couples play BG content on request Custom content welcome Special items Macon GA 71 Macon GA Coroner Leon Jones said he was shot in the back of the head craigslist columbus general In a release by the Bibb If you have any questions concerns or comments please contact Robert Spiegel or Kelly Pigott by phone or email as listed below Robert Spiegel Gay Porn Shemale Porn All tags Channels Pornstars RED videos Live Cams 200 Games Dating Profiles Liked videos My subs History Sep 2 2024 Explore Brenda ChurchRainss board Mom Daughter Tattoos on Pinterest See more ideas about tattoos tattoos for daughters Tells me hes not lucky No views 16 minutes ago more How To Get MINTY PICKAXE for FREE in Fortnite Kite FN New 211 views 1 ericasbooty Ericas Booty Porn ericas booty Nude Videos SpankBang

[yourcomedyminute]

YOUR COMEDY MINUTE WITH JOE SCROCCA #StandUp #Comedian #Producer #Promoter #NewJersey #Sweatshirt #EmmyButtrick #Terrible #Reading #Stuff #Redeem #Son #Joey #Dark #Wokeup #Dating #Crazy #Women #OpenMic #BikerBar #Jitters #Amazing #Business #Background #No #Response #Network #Shows #Being #Nice #Movie #SteveOakley #Zoom #Chose #Film #Evolution #Prank #BS #Google #Touched #HelaineWitt #SteveGoldberg #JustDev #NewJerseyMagazine #CanvasRebel #Online #IMDB #Short #Sundance #Online #Presence #Mystaru #Friend #SabrinaAyoub #Sucked #Partial #Welcoming #Advice #Shows #Bagels #After #Morning #RuthyFerrera #Shaved #OpenMic #College #Bar #Philadelphia #Bad #Area #Geography #Poking #Fun #Absurdity #Bomb #City #WilsonGoode #MOVE #House #Blocks #Bayside #HighSchool #NewYork #City #Change #Mic #Lighting #Cut #Laugh #Tragic #Honesty #Died #LaughAboutIt #NotMakingFun #Blind #Barbie #Dog #Down #Syndrome #Little #Girl #Boy #Difference #Missed #Something #HotWheels #Sportscar #GMA #Equestrian #Stick #Mattel #Karen #Political #Offended #People #Artform #Door #Vulgar #Break #Banned #Venue #Booker #Crazy #Stories #YouTube #Monetized #Cat #CWord #HateSpeech #Grandmother #Rosie #Riveter #Swearing #VanessaHollingshead #Rant #HotButton #Sick #SenseOfHumor #Bad #Guy #Wheelchair #Crip #Disability #Midget #Little #Person #Short #NWord #Honest #True #AtlanticCity #Prostitute #Hooker #Gay #RehobothBeach #Delaware #RoomService #Lesbian #Frog #Careful #Dating #Virgina #SlackTieBrewing #ChrisMorano #Sister #Niece #Paper #Teacher #School #Class #Semester #Grade #Wandered #Grade #Confused #Truth #Story #Edit #Funny #Comedy #Humor #Live #Stream 

If you would like to be a guest on Your Comedy Minute please contact me

[literallybyronic]

da:tv gameplay reveal thoughts (SPOILERS BELOW)

so. combat is basically ME, voice acting was pretty good though I'm iffy on Neve (personal preference but she sounded a bit stilted) and there were a few lines that were giving a little "what's a paladin" but it could have been worse. i still don't like the figure proportions, it looks too ValorApexWatchy, but it's not as bad without the exaggerated animation and camera work of the initial trailer. I also wish they'd showed combat when you have more than one ability. the PC was a rogue and you have a bow with recharging-over-time quiver plus dual wielded sword/dagger that you can switch between. looks like you can either hotbutton your abilities or select them from the pause wheel along with companion stuff. 3 potions, but there are breakable vases that drop them. overall more action-adventure than i really wanted but not unplayable. environment and setpieces look great. convo wheel is the same as DA:I, with stoic, comedic, etc choices, but seems like fewer options per choice. that could be contextual though. facial animations are quite good. the character design is really what's bugging me out of anything. it just seems wildly inconsistent in how cartoonish it looks. varric looks amazing (except for the dark hair which is weird), but solas looks spot on in some scenes and super stylized in others. idk. it looks not as good as i hoped but not as bad as i feared. i'll still play it. it just feels like a lot of the design and mechanical choices are derivative. the dialogue was also a little terse? but it was a big dramatic scene where the characters are rushing around so that could be why, but it just sounded... idk, perfunctory? varric still has his little quips but aside from that the dialogue was just a little... artless. but yeah, it wasn't nearly as bad as the character reveal trailer made it seem.