Tumgik
#i was watching Oppenheimer
retracexcviii · 10 months
Text
I love them
385 notes · View notes
suiheisen · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
gritty both capturing the zeitgeist as usual AND educating me on the availability of free flow butter at american cinemas
67K notes · View notes
ayo-edebiri · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
That's pretty hot actually
6K notes · View notes
linusbenjamin · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Prometheus stole fire from the gods and gave it to man. For this he was chained to a rock and tortured for eternity. Oppenheimer (2023) dir. Christopher Nolan
2K notes · View notes
frenchublog · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
dirty little animals
2K notes · View notes
attonitos-gloria · 10 months
Text
Oppenheimer has a scene of a very beautiful naked woman fucking a very beautiful naked man and there is zero sexual energy displayed on screen. Zero. Said woman stops halfway through it and makes the man (Oppenheimer himself) read a poem in Sanskrit about death, which the audience is supposed to associate with the atomic bomb. There is a second attempt at romance: Oppenheimer flirts while explaining quantum mechanics. Looking into his future wife's eyes under his big eyelashes, he says that matter is mostly empty, negative space; it's the bond between atoms that creates the illusion of matter being solid. What we experience as touch, he says while holding her hand, is the repulsion of this bond that stops one body from going through the other. It was in fact appealing to me, but then by the end of the movie Oppenheimer has visions of carbonized bodies laid before him: his invention destroyed matter in such a brutal way that he steps not onto them but through them. So basically. All scenes about sex are not about sex; they are about death. What is about sex in fact, the climax, if you will, is death: the most erotic scene in the movie, the high point of tension that takes your breath away, is a scene of people watching an atomic bomb explode. And that really says all you need to know about how Nolan's mind operates
2K notes · View notes
rogerdeakinsdp · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Cillian Murphy + favorite music moments
happy birthday, Robin! (@madeline-kahn)
372 notes · View notes
fkmarrycill · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Yes, let this man be spicy in peace.
233 notes · View notes
californiannostalgia · 10 months
Text
the barbie movie contains both the human need to 1) be a funny silly musical gremlin and 2) listen to our own thoughts and feelings without undermining ourselves as we navigate a world that makes absolutely no fucking sense
it's also about living as a woman because holy fuck isn't this shit messed up (the oppenheimer movie is proof of this)
416 notes · View notes
gayestcowboy · 10 months
Text
harry du bois would be sobbing at the end of the barbie movie due to its powerful and groundbreaking feminism and he is a #feminist. kim kitsuragi would watch oppenheimer and enjoy it but have no strong feelings about it
378 notes · View notes
just-joeja · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
It's barbenheimer week let's go
347 notes · View notes
bewires · 10 months
Text
oppenheimer criticisms I haven't seen but think would be fair:
-choice to have 90% of florence pugh's screentime being "hysterical topless woman"
-movie does not pass bechdel test at all; otoh it is a historical biopic representing the life of a man to whose field of study very few women had access at the time and the movie makes a point to show those women gaining access. like. it's not a movie about women at all, and I doubt I will see nolan make such a movie ever, but beyond florence pugh's character there are some good and nuanced moments in there especially with emily blunt but also with minor characters
-early sequences of tortured baby oppenheimer dreaming the beauty of physics are very overwrought
-choice to not shoot on location in germany (look this one is just for me I have been to all the places oppenheimer studied (I am not a theoretical physics fangirl but I know several) and the only place they chose not to actually film in person is göttingen which I take personal offense at)
-they cast matthias schweighöfer in a hollywood movie. no excuses for that one tbh.
oppenheimer criticisms I have seen and think are unfair
-"nolan can't make a good war movie" bc he will not make an intersectional war movie. potentially accurate in re dunkirk, which I didn't see bc I don't like war movies, but in this case he did not make a war movie, he made a historical biopic. the war is relevant, obviously, but the movie is not at all about the battlefield or the front, it is about the life of a physicist, and yes, it's not very intersectional.
-the effects of the a-bomb on the people of japan are not given due diligence. I understand people disagreeing about this but I have also seen several posts of people going "I won't watch this but I bet it doesn't" and uh. I think it does. I think every moment in this movie after the trinity test is entirely about oppenheimer realizing the impact of his research and it is shown several times, excruciatingly, how aware he is of what the effects of the a-bomb were. we do not see the bomb, nor do we see japan, because again, it is a historical biopic about this one dude and he wasn't there. this is also the first time I have seen a mainstream hollywood movie make repeat and pointed note of the fact that in a military sense the use of a-bombs in japan was not necessary.
-movie is pro-war/glorifies the a-bomb/glorifies oppenheimer. I think the strongest case you can make is that it glorifies the a-bomb because movie splosions are cool. but I also think the movie's biggest strength is its ambiguity. whose fault is it there was an a-bomb? is it oppenheimer's? he sure thinks so! is it einstein's? he sure thinks so at least indirectly! is it the american government's? they sure think so and they're proud of it (all of these according to the various chracters of this movie). is it a good thing they developed the a-bomb? several characters have several differing opinions on this! oppenheimer himself seems very divided and unsure by the end of the movie and cannot make a judgment call. in the end (much like with cillian murphy's other iconic character who wears a hat cough cough) if people walk out of this movie as fans of the character or his actions imo that's on them and not on the authorship of the movie
324 notes · View notes
penginlord · 22 days
Text
OK RTGAME WHAT THE FUCK
I thought your last Balatro video terrified me. This most recent one I just watched a man spite the gods, the devils, and the universe itself to create the most incomprehensible abomination unknown to man. this last hand you played. The numbers you achieved. RTGame has broken the universe. He has dethroned the devil and he simply laughs from his throne of glass polychrome 4 of spades. I, for one, am terrified, of what RTGame plays like when he is not guided by blind luck (his first RTGame seed play through) and instead guided by knowledge.
73 notes · View notes
sunshineandlyrics · 3 months
Text
😂 Cillian just stating facts! It's been fun watching RDJ make Christopher and Cillian, and other cast laugh so much on the Oppenheimer promo tour
75 notes · View notes
myfandomistingling · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
282 notes · View notes
artfartt · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
Guess who just came back from crying over a 2 hour long movie and are now questioning the meaning of life :D
167 notes · View notes