#in graph form

[broodwoof]

edit: just realized these graphs only go up to the individuals highest rating so except for those who hit 10/10 it's not a good comparison 😔😔😔

been doing too much work on this to not show it off lmao. conclusions drawn a lot from my own interpretations and toying with the evanuris over time, based on content we see in dai such as codex entries. not based on any book canon bc idk it! (don't spoil it in comments pls)

since the font is probably small:

elgar'nan | andruil

mythal | sylaise

falon'din | june

dirthamen | ghilan'nain

y-axis says is titled "degrees of..." and goes from 1-10

x-axis is titled "characteristics" and lists: entitlement; violence; respect for others; deceit; politicking; control; being feared; experiencing fear

entirely typed out below the cut for ppl who would prefer that, with any 10/10 traits bolded:

degree of entitlement:

elgar'nan - 10 / 10 mythal - 6 / 10 falon'din - 10 / 10 dirthamen - 7 / 10 andruil - 8 / 10 sylaise - 5 / 10 june - 4 / 10 ghilan'nain - 2 / 10

degree of violence:

elgar'nan - 10 / 10 mythal - 5 / 10 falon'din - 9 / 10 dirthamen - 4 / 10 andruil - 10 / 10 sylaise - 2 / 10 june - 2 / 10 ghilan'nain - 3 / 10

degree of respect for others:

elgar'nan - 2 / 10 mythal - 6 / 10 falon'din - 1 / 10 dirthamen - 3 / 10 andruil - 4 / 10 sylaise - 6 / 10 june - 3 / 10 ghilan'nain - 7 / 10

degree of deceit:

elgar'nan - 2 / 10 mythal - 8 / 10 falon'din - 4 / 10 dirthamen - 10 / 10 andruil - 7 / 10 sylaise - 4 / 10 june - 6 / 10 ghilan'nain - 3 / 10

degree of politicking:

elgar'nan - 4 / 10 mythal - 10 / 10 falon'din - 4 / 10 dirthamen - 10 / 10 andruil - 5 / 10 sylaise - 7 / 10 june - 3 / 10 ghilan'nain - 5 / 10

degree of control:

elgar'nan - 10 / 10 mythal - 10 / 10 falon'din - 9 / 10 dirthamen - 8 / 10 andruil - 9 / 10 sylaise - 1 / 10 june - 2 / 10 ghilan'nain - 1 / 10

degree of BEING feared:

elgar'nan - 10 / 10 mythal - 4 / 10 falon'din - 7 / 10 dirthamen - 2 / 10 andruil - 4 / 10 sylaise - 5 / 10 june - 5 / 10 ghilan'nain - 7 / 10

degree of EXPERIENCING fear:

elgar'nan - 2 / 10 mythal - 4 / 10 falon'din - 9 / 10 dirthamen - 5 / 10 andruil - 7 / 10 sylaise - 6 / 10 june - 4 / 10 ghilan'nain - 10 / 10

[lifemod17]

Jackie And Wilson

🎥: jennayyyo | tiktok

Columbus, Ohio || 06/18/2025

[thanatos-zagreus-shagreus]

Edwin: *monologuing about confusing feelings*

Monty: *kisses him*

Edwin: "That was unexpected"

Monty: "I have feelings for you too"

Edwin: "I wasn't talking about you"

Very funny but oh so awkward

[kaiserouo]

apparently someone datamined the whole dialogue tree, used some graphviz shuff to visualize that and posted on the wiki

good for reference but im not looking through all that and ruin the fun...

[zakiyah]

I ♡ charts and spreadsheets

[taylorrepdetective]

Normally I would not even glance at a Life & Style article, but given the new music mention, it made me pause at the Taylor Swift Thinks Travis Kelce Could ‘Flourish in the Studio’: They’re ‘Writing Lyrics Together’. Do you think this is planting a seed for a possible William Bowery II, or is it just “made up or from very unreliable sources?”

Life and Style is absolute garbage. They have never gotten an exclusive from a reputable source in their lives. Not once. Not even ever getting a reputable source who wanted to spread disinformation. 95% of it is 100% made up by them and the other 5% is based on fan speculation, which is sometimes correct, so if they get it correct, it’s because the fan speculation was correct. Not because they know more than you or I.

Do not pay it any mind. If by some chance Taylor decided to hilariously grace us with Billiam Wowery, it will be 100% coincidence or luck that L&S said this.

To put it into perspective, gossip rags that are 95% garbage but have actually gotten occasional good exclusives include the Daily Mail, Deux Moi, US weekly, TMZ (somewhat better than 95% but still a lot of garbage) and Page Six. If they say “exclusive” or quote a spokesperson for the celeb, then you can believe it came from an official source. However, if they say “sources close to the star” without the word “exclusive” it’s just as likely to be from garbage sources or made up as true. It’s possible that it’s made up garbage that is planted by their teams to throw people off or create speculation that eventually will be proven as untrue, but I honestly don’t think Taylor does much of that. It’s possible, but again just because garbage is coming for Taylor’s team does it make it any less worth throwing away.

For example US weekly yesterday had an exclusive source say “nothings’s changed. They are still together.” No other useful information from sources was included in that article. But that tidbit should tell you that travlor’s official people are saying this is what we should all be believing. And when she shows up on Monday, it will confirm it to everyone. However in similar articles you might see things like “previously, people close to the celebs had said they are ready to get engaged.” This is from a separate source that’s not exclusive and not official and from an earlier date and published in an earlier article, often from different publication (which they will cite.) For example, it might say “sources close to the singer previously said, as reported in the Daily Mail, that their loved ones expect an engagement soon.” This is a whole other thing, but because they put it in a same article as the one that is official saying they’re still together, people conflate the two “facts” and think to themselves “nothing has changed so their loved ones still think an engagement is soon.” Ignoring the fact that this first unsubstantiated garbage source said that 6 months ago and it stretches our imaginations of what “close” and “soon” mean.

Stay in school kids. This is why your high school English teachers made you analyze readings.

~~Edited to add another example how to read celeb gossip news: People just came out with an article about Travis’ diet and how he has to ignore sweets to stay in football shape. Now, People is the most “reliable*” and “reputable**” outlet when it comes to articles that have sourced information: their sources are the official sources. But this article does not cite an exclusive or sources close to the celeb or a spokesman for him. It is a fluff piece regurgitating public information that Travis said on his podcast this week, then going back and reiterating things he’s said in the past on his podcast. It is not an interview he did with People or anyone else, except to his brother on his edited podcast that he recently did a $100 million dollar deal on. They did a click-baity headline to get clicks, and wrote up a blurb about the silly things he said about staying in football shape. Just because it’s in People doesn’t mean it came from his camp exclusively to be published in People, or that this is part of some sort of selling of a narrative. It’s just a fluff piece that People published because they know any Travis content right now will get clicks.

*reliable means that they are spoon feeding us information directly from publicists which is not the same as the truth. Look at it as the official narrative that certainly has some semblance of truth or at least won’t be proven to be a lie later down the road.

**reputable means they are not just making stuff up on their own without getting some kind of reasonable confirmation.

[unnonexistence]

i should be Doing Tasks instead of sitting here waxing poetic about math but i do think graphs (the discrete math kind) (not this kind 📊📈📉) are the most elegant and beautiful mathematical object

[hearty-an0n]

[ID: first image has text that says “Who wins Toronto vs Minnesota?” with the data represented in a pie chart split 82.4% in blue for toronto and 17.6% in red for minnesota. second image has text that says “How many games” with the data represented in a pie chart split 64.7% in red for four games, 17.6% in orange for five games and 17.6% in blue for three games. End ID]

here are this series specific questions from my bracket challenge btw ^-^!!!! not a lot of varying opinions here lmao

[oblivious-aro]

Sigh...if only there was some kind of artistic discipline that involved drawing the same simple thing over and over again. Something with a satisfying flow where you just create perfect copies an-

WAIT A MINUTE!!!

[bitegore]

I think I need to learn to make really unusual book bindings because I keep wanting to bind specific things for myself (sketchbook that is exactly the size of my jacket pocket, for example) and the current one i'm stuck on is "formal-looking notebook outside, leather and shit, with interior binding designed to let you switch out signatures easily and featuring graph paper instead of lined or unlined paper" and I know that that is just a binder. That's literally just what a binder is meant to be. But i also, crucially, want the paper to have a .25cm/~0.1 in grid size and be around 7.5x6cm /3x2.3in. I do not think these sized binders exist and I most certainly do not think that they look good if they do.

[the-white-void]

That short snippet of part 5 was chilling, you GOTTA expand on that! Or are you busy?

It's been collecting dust in my drafts like my other 15 WIPs, and I'm just brain-dead right now and have been hyper-fixating on my... delusions. But I made a promise and I plan to keep it... not like I ever go according to plan

[carmendeiact2whenplz]

Why Bardven is objectively the best ship in genshin (and maybe ever)

1- Although it is by no means canon, it’s one of the more likely genshin ships to be implied in canon (if hoyoverse were to ever mention old mond again smh)

2- (Mostly an explanation for number 1 but) While many other ships in fandoms only count as ships if they’re romantic, as long as you acknowledge venti and nb loved eachother (which lets be honest there aren’t many arguments against this) in any way shape or form, congrats. You ship them. It’s just how it is

3- THERE ARE SO MANY WAYS TO INTERPRET THEIR RELATIONSHIP! Platonic, romantic, queerplatonic, whatever silly little relationship dynamic you can think of, it probably works with bardven.

4- Not just relationship dynamics! Bardven can be angst, fluff, sososo many different AUs, canon divergence, angst, angst, hurt/comfort, hurt/no comfort…. the possibilities are endless! Since there are so many plot holes and things that aren’t canonically confirmed, your headcanons can’t be confirmed but they can’t be denied either :)

5- They are two silly little guys who bonded over their mutual hatred of a god, then later worked together to assassinate said god and won. Need I say anything else?

6- You have the excuse to say “historians said they were close friends”

Might add more when I think of more

[bbnibini]

I think Enkidu likes me a lil bit...?

I got them to NP3 by non-rateup pulls (yes these are all spooks 😭)

I got 10 copies of their summer CE while pulling in the OG summer banner for Maid Alter and the summer banner rerun this year (the other one is in Second Archive)

And now the current event??? (I literally just did a ten pull from the free 30sq and the monthly tix)

I was wondering why I kept getting this card then I saw who was on top and was like OH THE CLAY they follow

[wall-eye]

a barnes and nobel opened in town 👍i need to be careful in there

[dragontatoes]

I'm real tired of getting bad grades and not sure if it's that I'm not trying hard enough anymore bc of burnout, or if the upper division courses are just too hard for me. not even attempting some assignments bc my brain deemed them "worthless bullshit" is probably the largest factor but wtf can i do about that

[enkvyu]

hey guys ! very unfortunately, i'm entering midterm week so two-faced updates will be super inconsistent across the next few days. i will try to update as much as i can but i'm worried if i do, then all the chapters will be about organic chemistry or anatomy so. yk.

think of it like gojo n the gang are also going through their midterms so they do not have time to go on twt (soon to be called x like wtf is that) and be silly

thank you for all the love on two-faced as always !! love u guys 🤍