Tumgik
#it's the hypocrisy that i can't stand
bixels · 1 month
Text
I'm not explaining why re-imagining characters as POC is not the same as white-washing, here of all places should fucking understand.
#personal#delete later#no patrick. “black washing” is not as harmful as white washing.#come on guys get it together#seeing people in my reblogs talk about “reverse racism” and double standards is genuinely hypocrisy#say it with me: white washing is intrinsically tied to a historical and systematic erasure of poc figures literature and history.#it is an inherently destructive act that deplatforms underrepresented faces and voices#in favor of a light-skinned aesthetic hegemony#redesigning characters as poc is an act of dismantling symbols of whiteness in fiction in favor of diversification and reclamation#(note that i am talking about individual acts by individual artists as was the topic of this discourse. not on an industry-scale)#redesigning characters as poc is not tied to hundreds of years of systemic racism and abuse and power dynamics. that is a fact.#you are not replacing an underrepresented person with an oft-represented person. it is the opposite#if you feel threatened or upset or uncomfortable about this then sorry but you are not aware of how much more worse it is for poc#if representation is unequal then these acts cannot be equivalent. you can't point to an imbalanced scale and say they weigh the same#if you recognize that bipoc people are minorities then you should recognize that these two things are not the same#while i agree that “black washing” can lead to color-blind casting and writing the behavior here is on an individual level#a black artist drawing their favorite anime character as black because they feel a shared solidarity is not a threat to you#i mean. most anime characters are east asian and i as an east asian person certainly don't feel threatened or erased. neither should you.#there's much to be said about the politics of blackwashing (i don't even know if that's the right word for it)#but point standing. whitewashing is an inherently more destructive act. both through its history of maintaining power dynamics#and the simple fact that it's taking away from groups of people who have less to begin with#if you feel upset or uncomfortable about a fictional white character being redesigned as poc by an artist on twitter#i sincerely hope you're able to explore these feelings and find avenues to empathizing with poc who have had their figures#(both real and fictional) erased; buried; and replaced by white figures for hundreds of years#i sincerely hope you can understand the difference in motivations and connotations behind whitewashing and blackwashing#classic bixels “i'm not talking about this chat. i'm not” (puts my media studies major to use in the tags and talks the fuck outta it)
1K notes · View notes
thv-jk97 · 1 month
Note
https://www.tumblr.com/thv-jk97/759279742700634112/httpswwwtumblrcomthv-jk97759198017568063488?source=share
This anon refers to an ask I sent to Peach a few days ago. I don't know if they missed the context or my sardonic approach, or both? I was being facetious to draw a comparison to how Jkkrs react, poking fun at their bonkers takes on members interactions (or lack of) and responding to how thet constantly send asks to Tkkr blogs demanding a reply. These asks are similarly phrased, exaggerating regular situations to suit a fictious story they have crafted where Jungkook and Jimin are cast in reductive masc/fem roles and taehyung is the big bad . They will purposely use hyperbolic language and tone with zero irony (Tae drowning Jungkook in the pool anyone?) And insist on being taken seriously not only in shipper communities but by army fandom at large. They literally change whole translations of conversations to suit themselves and cry anti when called out. They twist and straight up lie about members relationships and interactions to fit the roles I set out earlier and to diminish others. Empty vessels make the most noise and it is clear these people are very, very lacking. I am tired of taking the high road to spare someone else's feelings about how they feel Jimin might feel - do you see the lunacy? Not everything, esp blog posts on the Internet, are to be taken so literally. I, of course, know jimin would not burn in the sun, I'm sure he had plenty sunblock on (stand by jungkooks nip attack though) As others have commented, I find it amusing that people send asks pointing out how "mean" people are to jimin and ignore the absolute character assassinations carried out by jkkrs on the daily not only in their own blogs but also in their repeated attempts to bait Tkkrs for engagement.
Hi @charjube!
Ah okay! Thanks for the clarification lol. I do actually remember seeing your post on Peach's page but didn't make the connection 😅 probably because I registered that you weren't actually being serious haha. I guess, in their defense, it's not surprising that they missed your point since, like you said, they use these grand exaggerations without a hint of irony because they actually mean those things 🥴
Obvs we know that Jimin wasn't "left to burn in the sun" and I'm sure if anyone thought he was actually in any harms way, one of the multiple staff members literally standing feet away from him would've intervened. It's not that serious fhdsjkfhsdjk
The fact that they continuously feel the need to come into TK spaces/want to bait tkkrs to engage with their ridiculous takes just reiterates how desperate and lacking their arguments actually are. And if they weren't so vile most of the time, I'd almost feel bad for them.
Thanks for your thoughts!
9 notes · View notes
finchjpeg · 13 days
Text
can I just say something. I think we've warped the idea of consent and self care so far that they've come to mean you never have to do anything that makes you been a tad uncomfortable to benefit anyone else (or yourself but that's another discussion). sometimes you have to take a shift at the community kitchen when no one else can even if you're a bit tired. sometimes you have to step in to help a friend in need even though you have an exam the next day. sometimes you have to be there for someone even if you find them a bit distasteful or boring. sometimes you have to find time or energy to protest for a cause even if you don't have so much. when you're in a community you don't just get to 'protect your peace' and 'focus on you' all the time.
I'm not saying you have to martyr yourself for a cause, I'm not saying you have to burn yourself out or force yourself through things you categorically can't do, I'm not saying everything is on you, but I'm saying sometimes (often) following your own ethical code requires pushing through a bit of hardship and being rewarded by the joy of knowing you're doing what's right and that you are a person who knows what they believe and acts on it.
seeing this debate on whether it's ok to block the tags that palestinians fundraise via is making me feel so sick. seeing all these pathetic wetwipes saying they had to block the tags because witnessing even a fraction of these people's pain makes them feel sad and hopeless is disgusting. sometimes you have to stand the fuck up and do whats right even if it's a little bit hard or a little bit upsetting. if you can't reblog a goddamn fundraiser or act on a request in an ask from people living through a goddamn fucking genocide I don't even want to think about the ways you'd let me down if we were in a community together.
8 notes · View notes
pardonmydelays · 9 months
Text
tumblr is fun & all until one of your mutuals decides to join the hate train-
13 notes · View notes
welcometogrouchland · 6 months
Text
Also in the replies of the Steph concept art on twitter announcing she was gonna be in a new project at DC (posted by Travis Mercer), there were at least 3 comments saying "will Tim be there?" I don't care how hard you ship timsteph I'm exploding you with my eyeballs if you do that on my girls post again
#ramblings of a lunatic#taking a step back to acknowledge that my stanning may be getting overzealous#but then again I'm not in ppls quotes or replies I'm vagueing on an entirely different website with no relevant tags. it could be worse#anyway I know tims had it rough these past couple of months ever since zdarsky shifted focus of the batman title to have less tim#but it still feels. idk. just a wee bit uninspired to act like steph can't go two steps without tim being behind her#im ngl i like timsteph when they're cute but timsteph twitter has been. pissing me off a tad lately#the refusal to acknowledge the sexism in dixons robin run and how it impacts stephs writing and their relationships writing#the refusal to acknowledge tims occasional condescension and hypocrisy when it comes to stephs vigilantism#seemingly only wanting her to be spoiler when he wants her around and telling her to give it up most of the time#also the constant disrespect of stephs batgirl era on there weirdly enough?#I've harped on about this on main and in drafts but despite it's flaws it's a good turn for stephs character#she's the focus she gets development (an upward trajectory! which had previously been unheard of for her! bc she did have flaws as spoiler-#-its just that both writers and characters alike seemed to arbitrarily decide she didn't have the capacity to grow past them! but she did!)#hell i saw a BIZARRE take today i just have to bitch about#which was them saying that Batgirl was a ''heteronormative mask'' steph put on#with spoiler being her more authentic self (and this being paralleled to gender expression with stephs isolation from the batfam as spoiler-#-showing how she ''wasnt like them'')#which. I'm not denying you the view that spoiler has a certain genderific swag to her but the needless dragging of her batgirl persona#steph got treated badly as spoiler bc she was A Girl. it's genuinely that simple dixon felt batman and robin would never stand for a girl-#-running around doing the things they did and would need to chivalrously stop her. he's gone on record saying this#she's constantly getting belittled by mostly men (cass also dismisses her but it feels distinctly less gendered)#and in the end it's barbara who learns to give steph a second chance despite her mistakes and they have a positive relationship#something ppl are quick to dismiss as being in and of itself sexist bc they're pairing the two girls off together#as if batgirl isn't a legacy and as if babs and steph don't have parallels in their resilience and refusal to accept when ppl tell them no#for better and for worse!!#like. idk how you took the strongest feminist element in that comic (bc there are elements of sexism here and there! 2009 n all)#and somehow turn it into ''heteronormativity'' YOU PPL ARE JUST SAYING WORDS AT THIS POINT!!!#anyway. someone take away my internet access
7 notes · View notes
andrrrgynous · 3 months
Text
i wish twitter and tumblr would get their old algorithms back bc i dont follow a lot of paramore accounts for a REASON stop putting them on my tl
3 notes · View notes
bitacrytic · 11 months
Text
Me, to Mew and Sand:
Tumblr media
9 notes · View notes
lord-squiggletits · 1 year
Text
It kinda sucks how Optimus Prime is a character who people (in real life) expect to be so Indubitably Good All The Time that they immediately shut down and refuse to acknowledge him whenever he does bad things or fucks up. Like I don't think I've seen any other character in this fandom get the same instantly negative reaction/never talk about him ever treatment that IDW Optimus gets.
Like, it's either him being a cop or the annexation of Earth. But instead of actually engaging with the story and going "so how does being a cop affect the way he treats and is treated by others" or "what led Optimus to annex Earth and how is this a reflection of his ultimately heroic ideal to treat organics as equal to Cybertronians despite the historical racism of his species"
people just instantly shut down and go "oh he's an asshole, he's stupid, he's not my Optimus, he's a bastard, he's edgy" etc etc and refuse to even like fuckin talk about him
It's so incredibly childish lmao especially when the IDW1 continuity in particular is already rife with characters who are also assholes that do stupid/regrettable things but people have no problems talking about/analyzing their stories.
My kingdom for a fandom that's willing to talk about IDW Optimus without immediately shutting down and just going "he's bad he's a bastard he sucks"
18 notes · View notes
Note
Hi. I read this post, and while I see your point, I think it's actually the other way around.... Or at least, I think that.
Tumblr media
The parents clearly dod not cared about Chloé. As you said, Audry left, and don't even remembers her daughter's name most of the time, and, while Andre provided for Chloe, he possibly never was around either, leaving only Jackue Whateverhisnameis to serve her.
Tumblr media
The parents clearly did not done these👆, that's the point. Even Andre, he did not done these; did not helped Chloé discover who she is, kinda protected her, but without care, enabeling her to protect HERSELF, and strangly, I think he did not love her.... I can't recall he would ever huged his daughter, while I remember she huged Ms. Boustie, which (in highsight) is obviously strange...
Let me theorize a bit, I think Andre created Chloe to the image of Audry, as a "Love fixing child" when he felt she is about to leave him (obviously, it didn't worked). He "loved" Chloe, in that sence he loved the part she is like her mother, so he kinda tried to compensate, but since Chloe isn't Audry, he failed hard.
So, all together, I think (at least as I interpreting the story) Yeah, Audry and Andre both deserving what they get, but the main point is to prove what Felix said; when you don't care for your creation the results are just as bad as if you use them.
So yeah, I personally don't feel pity either of the parents, both deserve this, they CAUSED THIS, and I think that's what the story want to say
I agree with what you say, my point was the hypocrisy of the writing. Where Félix, Kagami and Adrien are portrayed as victims and worth saving, Chloé is not given the same treatment (from Astruc especially).
Both Audrey and André are horrible parents (like most in MLB, to be honest). She abandoned her family and abuses her daugther, while André didn’t give Chloé the affection nor the discipline she needed. All he did was throw money at her and enableing her bad behaviour. Bad behaviour she emulated from her mother, the person Cholé wants above else to love her. The other issue is that in the end André, instead of standing up to Audrey’s abuse and save his daughter from her, will denounce Chloé (although he had part in her upbringing) and will abandon her with her abuser. All while the writers paint him as a "strong liberated man". But all they’ll be doing is showing just how much of a coward André is (Chloé is like that also because of him, but he’ll not be held accountable for it) and how they (the writers) are a bunch of hypocrites.
You said the hug between Miss Bustier and Chloé is “strange”, seeing things now, but the reason is that that hug was meant to be the start of Chloé's change. Sadly the story was derailed by Astruc in s3, just because he hates her on a personal level (I know she’s fictional, but the way he talks about her makes you wonder if he knows that).
The hug with Bustier, her apologising multiple times, her relationship with Adrien, Sabrina, Jaques and even her parents show Chloé was not evil to begin with. Adrien tells us she wasn’t like the Chloè we know from s1, but again because of hypocrisy and the hatered of one man against a fictional teenage girl, all of that depth and development was thrown out the window and Chloé was branded as “irredeemably evil”. While characters like Félix (that killed the entire population of Paris and only brought them back because Adrien was mad at him) and Gabriel (we know what he did), will be given forgiveness and redemption by Ladybug (and therefore, by the writers).
That said, I really like the theory that Chloé is also a senti. I wrote something like that a while back, but the issue with that is that neither Audrey nor André have fallen sick like Emilie or Colt (and possibly Kagami's father). And while I do think the sentiChloé theory could save her character, I doubt they would go for it, since Astruc hates the character and openly mocks her fans.
20 notes · View notes
Text
literally batshit insane how yoda saw order 66, the end of the galactic republic and the jedi order, and anakin skywalker's fall from grace and then just said...nah not my problem.
in the mortis arc, when Anakin saw those same visions, he intentionally went darkside to give himself the power to kill palpatine & prevent all of that (including O66). The Father wiped his memory in the end because, with The Daughter dead and anakin turned, The Son was too powerful and the Force was thrown out of balance...which makes sense considering The Father's sole role is to exist as the embodiment of that Light/Dark balance. What may one day happen to some jedi means nothing to him, as long as he maintains balance in the moment.
Yoda's job is not that. He witnessed the (very imminent) destruction of his people, millions of lives, the war effort they'd fought so hard for down the drain...and he just said "nah, the galaxy will sort this out. whatever happens is up to fate." I understand the whole message in a lot of media, where if you try to fuck with fate, you get fucked over even worse, but he's willing to leave the lives of MILLIONS OF INNOCENTS up to fate? He's leaving it up to trust that the natural order and balance of the universe will be okay in the end????
BRUH.
9 notes · View notes
sureuncertainty · 1 year
Text
love reading an amazing book with some of the most fantastic aro/ace rep i have ever read, and then going on goodreads to see the most willfully misinterpreted acephobic garbage in the reviews, like allos literally die when something’s not about them for .5 seconds huh
#win rambles#character in a book 'wow i don't like sex and it's annoying how it's everywhere'#someone presumably allo reading it 'WOW THIS CHARACTER IS SO SEX NEGATIVE AND JUDGY AND SHAMES PEOPLE FOR HAVING SEX'#the reviewer that was like 'wow i hate how this author tries to act like platonic relationships are BETTER than romantic ones'#when it's literally like hey what if romantic relationships weren't treated as vastly superior to every other kind of relationship#for two seconds and they see that as such an attack#like do you HEAR yourselves???#you literally sound like the 'these gay people shove it in our faces' for existing crowd#the ones that are like 'oh so you're saying that gay relationships are BETTER??? you're saying that cishets should die??? is that it???#and don't realize the hypocrisy... like that's what your'e doing#within our own community#allos cannot STAND things not being about them for two seconds#and they see aro/ace people existing as threatening them#(also no one is saying that being sex repulsed is the only way to be ace just bc the mainc haracter of the book was dear god)#but also consider.... being sex repulsed repulsed is....okay#like it's LITERALLY like looking at homophobes and reminding them that we're not saying THEY have to get gay married#just that it's good that gay marriage exists and that's fine#it's the SAME FUCKING THING like no one is telling you that you can't have sex or judging you for having se#but people deserve to be able to choose not to and not feel like they're broken or wrong for doing so#anyway sorry for the tag rant
7 notes · View notes
izacore · 1 year
Text
.
3 notes · View notes
boysdontcryboycry · 1 year
Text
thought y'all would find this funny, leading a double life where most my mutuals don't care about st and don't know about. gestures to my entire blog. is actually so hilarious sometimes
Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
xadenviolct · 10 days
Text
I had the news on this morning as I got ready for work, and you know, it's hilarious how Taylor Swift's endorsement means "nothing at all, it isn't important" now that she endorsed Kamala...
But yet, it was so important that the buffoon's campaign spread around fake AI images of her supporting HIM? Went through the effort and whatnot of making them, tweeting them, etc. etc.?
It's just... an interesting "huh" moment.
(Also, I get fed up with people who are all "stay out of politics" when it comes to any type of celebrity or athlete or what have you. They have just as much right to express their opinion as the average American on the street or in the Facebook comments. So what if their audience is millions and billions on a single Instagram post and the average Joe might reach... a few dozen, most of those family?
That's not the point.
You can't be shouting all FREEDOM and whatnot, and then get all pissy when certain people express that freedom.)
1 note · View note
thesoundofmadness · 2 months
Text
anyone wanna fucking end me
0 notes
entityinahumanbody · 4 months
Text
women will diss u in front of ur face, snicker abt it, say that u're being sensitive when u react negatively to it, and THEN - this is the icing on the cake - try to convince u in other instances that men are the real enemy. girl, who's to blame when u're made aware that no man was involved when u were talking shit??? like what r u even saying?? all of u human mfs r evil. i'm disassociating.
0 notes