Tumgik
#legosi icons
prplocks · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
✧❁ icons 〴 legoshi ˗ˏˋ ´ˎ˗
reblog if you save ➳
༶•┈┈┈┈┈┈୨♡୧┈┈┈┈┈•༶
38 notes · View notes
mi-koo · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
funny icons legoshi!
like/reb if you use ( *・⁠ω⁠・⁠)
435 notes · View notes
oracleact · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
personally, I think wolf cuddles are the best cuddles. he’s just so fluffy!
41 notes · View notes
sheila--e · 11 months
Text
don't talk to me I'm thinking of Haru.
2 notes · View notes
tyrantisterror · 6 months
Note
You've stated that you’ve found every Dracula adaptation EXCEPT Netflix’s Castlevania to a pale imitation of Bram Stoker’s original novel. Why then do you have a soft spot for Legosi’s Dracula? Are there any other unfaithful adaptations of Dracula you feel particularly affectionate towards?
...I don't think that's quite what I've stated, actually. While I think almost every adaptation of Dracula I've seen/listened to/read has altered and cut a lot of the things I love about the book they're supposedly based on, often to the point of being unrecgonizable, I don't think that means they have no merit as stories of their own. Like, an adaptation can be unfaithful to the source material and still be a good story in its own right. And you can be disappointed that an adaptation took so many divergences from the source material while still liking the end product.
I have affection for the vast majority of Dracula adaptations I've seen. The Hammer Dracula movies are some of my favorites - they're really what people are adapting when they turn Van Helsing into Dracula's nemesis, and Peter Cushing's take on Van Helsing is, while not quite true to his literary counterpart, absolutely iconic. He's like the Sherlock Holmes or MacGuyver of vampire slaying, constantly improvising new methods of fending off and fighting vampires.
Or, like, Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein, which is one of the first and absolute best horror comedies ever made, and marked the only time Bela Lugosi returned to play Dracula. It has almost nothing in common with the book by Bram Stoker, taking just the concept of Count Dracula and inserting him into this farce where he tries to make the Frankenstein monster his minion by giving it Lou Costello's brain. Not a "faithful" adaptation, but the world would be worse without it.
Almost every adaptation of Dracula takes every character from the book who isn't named "Dracula" or "Van Helsing" and either drains them of personality so they're no longer recognizable, or cuts them altogether, and I will always find that disappointing as a fan of the book. But those adaptations often have other things going on that compensate for it and make them good or at least interesting stories in their own right. Do I wish more adaptations were faithful to the book? Yeah, because the characters in the book are excellent and deserve to be known just as well as the Count himself. But that doesn't mean the adaptations that gut them don't have their own charms.
56 notes · View notes
gothlisteningclub · 5 months
Text
Goth Listening Club Day #56: Bauhaus - The Bela Session
Tumblr media
"In 1979, Bauhaus released the first vommercially successful goth rock single, the iconic post-punk song Bela Legosi's Dead. It was released as a single on vinyl with Boys as the B-side. This album is a release of the entire original recording session almost 40 years later."
LISTEN ON: BANDCAMP / APPLE MUSIC / SPOTIFY
15 notes · View notes
Text
Legoshi (Beastars) - Autism Rizz Tournament Preliminaries
Tumblr media
If you vote yes you must firmly believe in this character's autism AND in the rizz their autism gets them. If you don't want the character in the tournament just vote no
Propaganda:
It’s literally canon no one understand him even though he makes perfect sense to himself, he takes things very literally and you have to be straightforward with him
Autism beast 5000 bisexual icon, he has at least 3 people that he rizzed and he doesn't even know how much rizz he has. His special interest is bugs and has said he wishes he was a bug sometimes because life would be simpler, also has a very strong sense of morality and many many other reasons but he's just so full of autism and his boyfriend and girlfriend were not immune to his autistic charm like they are both so whipped for his dumb ass
13 notes · View notes
thornofshadows · 5 months
Text
Are there wrestling fans in this fandom? Because I wrote some of a wwf/e style fic where they’re wrestlers, literally made myself cry when Legosi did his version of Dusty Rhodes’ iconic “hard times” promo. Would you read it? Because I’d have to make it a long one since I have so many references.
2 notes · View notes
picklepie888 · 2 years
Text
Dracula (1931) movie review by someone who's been reading Dracula Daily
So, a few days ago I watched the 1931 Dracula film. The one with Bela Legosi. I had actually seen the movie before several years ago, but I didn't remember very much of it, and of course I hadn't read the book back then. Now that I've been doing Dracula Daily, let me give my thoughts on the film. SPOILERS FOR THE MOVIE AND IF YOU'RE NOT CAUGHT UP ON DRACULA DAILY
The thing that made me the most mad about this adaptation is that Lucy's storyline is just glossed over. Like, she appeared in literally one scene, and then in the next the doctors are over her body and declare her dead. That's it! No emotional impact whatsoever! Lucy has maybe two minutes of screentime at most, and her death does not effect the other characters at all. It's like she was an afterthought on the writers' part. Like they're making the script and someone was like 'oh wasn't there like that one girl that Dracula kills? Maybe we should mention that somewhere.' 'Ok, Joe we'll get a girl off the street to do the scene before lunch.' It was so infuriating! In the book, Lucy's death was the driving force that lead the main characters to hunt Dracula down. She was so beloved by all the characters, but here??? She's just another nameless victim of the vampire.
Ok, now that I got the factor I hated the most out of the way, I'll bring up my second most hated. Mina's entire character has been reduced to the typical damsel-in-distress archetype. She's no longer the courageous, intelligent, gender nonconforming woman she is in the original story. Instead they made her the same helpless, screaming woman that they show in every horror film in the 30's. Just about every scene she's in, she's crying or screaming her husband's name or being under the complete control of Dracula. She has no agency, and she doesn't do anything to drive the plot forward. My point is the female characters were done dirty this movie.
Arthur and Quincey are completely omitted. No fun cowboy or rich some guy shenanigans to be found here.
Jack Seward is an old man, and about the same age as Van Helsing, which completely changes the dynamic between the two. Instead of having a teacher-mentor relationship with a very strong familial bond, instead they just sorta act like business partners??? Like, if I hadn't read the book I wouldn't have any idea that these two were supposed to have a close friendship. Also they made him Mina's father for some reason???
Bela Lugosi as Dracula and Dwight Frye as Renfield were by far the most entertaining aspects of the movie. Lugosi does a legitimatly good job portraying such a creepy and otherworldly character, and I can see why this is his most famous film role. And Frye's performance as Renfield, I'd argue is even creepier. He makes a very good madman. But as good as these actors were, my biggest gripe is that their characters got WAY too much screentime. The filmmakers decided to give all the spotlight to the villains when they should've focused more on Jonathan and Mina. Or, ya know, LUCY!!!
As for Jonathan, his character was fine I guess. They kinda watered him down to just the concerned husband who has to save his screaming helpless wife. At least he actually cares about Mina, and they didn't make him a heartless douche like in some adaptations. Still, he's pretty bland, which is sad because he had such a rich character in the book.
Van Helsing was also fine. He was basically the only character who moved the plot forward. His interactions with Dracula were also pretty cool, and the two had the sort of nemesis chemistry that became iconic in later adaptations of Dracula. Still wish they had given that same kind of chemistry with the other characters.
The sets in this movie were great! The castle at the start of the film is like something out of a nightmare, and it sets the mood for the whole film. There's also the lack of a music score, which makes the film all the more unsettling. I'll give the filmmakers props for that.
I did not care for how they did Renfield's death in this movie. They still had him betray Dracula to protect Mina, but they had him die begging for mercy and pledging his loyalty to Dracula. They made him die a coward instead of fighting the bat bitch himself like a Chad. RIP Renfield, you did not deserve to be disrespected like this.
The pacing of this movie was really weird?? The runtime is under 80 minutes, which is no where near enough to cover all the plot points from the OG story. So they just kinda move from one plot point to the next w/o much of a transition. Like the whole thing with Lucy. And even Dracula's attack on Mina happened offscreen and was only mentioned by the characters later. I really wish they had made this a series of movies instead of compiling everything into an hour.
Overall, its a fine movie on its own. But as an adaptation of Dracula? Awful. At least there's no Dracmina romance subplot in this version. But they basically watered down every character to fit a horror film archetype, and put way too much focus on the villains instead of the main characters. 4/10
35 notes · View notes
serpink · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
legosi (beastars) icons; @diliernum
3 notes · View notes
avatar-aaang · 1 year
Text
watching the bela legosi dracula now. Hes too sexy right off....... the bat. Also the order and way the story is being told is so incredibly weird. And there are possums and armadillos in dracula's castle?!!? love that for him
Renfield is always so iconic tho, no wonder he got his own movie (which was a very fun watch on its own btw)
2 notes · View notes
revenant-coining · 1 year
Text
Icons Pt 1
[ pt: Icons Pt 1 ]
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Fluttershy ( My Little Pony ): Catgender, Poyconic, and Genderkissed
Legosi ( Beastars ): Quirken, BPD, and Mechbeing
Hero ( Omori ): Spacething, Angeadornix, and Sleepintent
@makeyoum1ne
6 notes · View notes
animerulesx3 · 3 months
Text
Matching icons
Legosi x Louis
( Beastars )
Tumblr media Tumblr media
1 note · View note
sweetness-pop · 8 months
Text
Hey,
what if this will happen in Season 3 of Helluva Boss?:
Loona will encounter an upcoming character who is a tall, mysterious, edgy, strong, dangerous, powerful, & extremely handsome & hot 23 year old male character who's revealed as a "Tribrid" because he is part demon from Hell, part angel from Heaven, & part Human from Earth.
Born as the result of a forbidden love affair between his Cambion father (half-demon/half-human) & Nephilim mother (half-angel/half-human).
He is the one supernatural being to absolutely not FUCK with!
He could be like the Shadow (you know, Shadow the Hedgehog) of Helluva Boss with looks of a BADASS anime-style man!
The best voice actor for this role, & to join the HB cast should be Jonah Scott, who's best-known/iconic role is Legosi of Beastars.
Imagine Loona ends up getting herself deeply involved with this guy, & as the duo grow on each other as allies & close friends who will actually help each other evolve as people for their character development, they will feel a strong connection to each other that could possibly lead to you know what to happen in S4 aka Final Season!
& His name: Xol (like Sol meaning the SUN)
🤍🌙🐺👨🏻☀🖤
0 notes
astropithecus · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
RENFIELD (2023): An action comedy may seem like an odd choice for a direct sequel to the 1931 Legosi classic, but RENFIELD is appropriately affectionate towards the source material while still delivering the laughs. Hoult remains largely faithful to Dwight Frye's iconic performance, but manages to humanize the character and make it his own.
1 note · View note
louisedit · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Legosi & Louis Matching Icons and Headers.
226 notes · View notes