"Deuteronomy has God commanding his people to raid cities and take women aNd wE aLl kNoW wHat MeaNs" NO YOU DON'T, you idiot.
Israelites were forbidden to have sex outside of marriage AND marry foreign/non Israelite women, so that excludes the possibility for them to rape the women they spared during war.
I swear you guys have your fricking brain rotten by your paranoid agenda that you automatically assume that a man taking charge of women means he's going to rape or abuse her. Totally deranged.
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 isn't about rape but (consensual) sex outside marriage. Again, this person is literally making shit up assuming that bc a man lies with a woman = rape. There's actually a whole another passage in Deuteronomy tackling the punishment of rape (death). I already covered this common lie here.
"tHe mIsoGynY iN tHe bIbLe iSnt sUbtLe"
Ah yes, sooo no subtle you have to make shit up (rape) to make your point.
If the Bible was misogynistic, women would be the only one to have specific obligations. You constantly focusing on women not being to have authority over men shows how MALE CENTRIC you are. You refuse to acknowledge CHRISTIAN WOMEN don't have to abide under any male authority because *ding ding* Christian women existence doesn't revolve around marriage or church assembly/teaching (the place where they can't teach men). But you are soooo obsessed with men that for you, not being able to "dominate" them in one aspect is an offense. If the Bible was forcing women to be under male authority, it wouldn't be the only religion to elevate CELIBACY over marriage.
The only white lies I see are people like you omitting all the other obligations & punishment abiding to men (sometimes, because of women's action) to act like the Bible was focusing on women alone.
Oh and one last thing: Eve having to bear the consequence of her sin isn't misogyny. She messed up and she got punished for that. So did almost all the biblical characters. Accountability isn't "misogyny". also why are you constantly leaving out how Adam TOO got punished and had his own curse (having to work HARD for survival)
Interestingly enough "tHe bIblE is MisogYnIst" squad NEVER brings up why the sin that Eve instigated is called ADAM'S curse....not Eve's curse...🤔 " If the Bible hates women sooooo much, then why does that curse took Adam's name who had to equally share the responsibility (when he sinned only because Eve told him to) ? "Adam didn't get deceived" is factually true. Cope. Women can do mistakes, IDK why you have such a hard time to downplay Eve's
....something-something..... Ah YES : reciprocity of gender roles. You seethe about women having no authority over men? just wait until you learn that men will share guilt for sins or actions perpetuated by WOMEN🙃 Samson anyone? Yael/Barak??...oh sorry, if you actually READ the Bible you'd know what I'm talking about.
And let's not forget how Lot got actually RAPED by his 2 daughters who went away scot free.... Funny how these anti Bible wack feminists have nothing to say about that 🤡 There are occurrence of women (sexually or emotionally) abusing men in the Bible and men aren't screeching about it as much as you do. Men in the Bible had to deal with much more injustice and struggle than biblical women but you won't shut up about how evil the Bible is bc you are a bunch of conceited self centered minsinformed ignorant ungrateful harpies.
21 notes
·
View notes
Bit of an opinionated rant but:
Idk why everyone is so upset over the Zelda timeline and the Zelda continuity or whatever. I like the huge spaghetti mess that is Zelda lore. I like that the developers don’t give a fuck about consistency. I’m glad it gives them the freedom to make whatever the fuck in their games.
Is it perfect? No. Could it be better? Of course!
But isn’t half the fun of being a Zelda theorist, playing with the puzzle pieces yourself? For me personally, it doesn’t matter if Nintendo never had this grand master plan of the Zelda lore. It means everyone can come to their own conclusions on the origin of the heroes or the magic or the different groups of people. And that’s kinda by design.
8 notes
·
View notes