23 Republican Senators & 124 Congressmen signed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court asking for a 50 state ban on mifepristone, a drug safer than tylenol that is standard treatment for abortion & miscarriages, "due to safety concerns".
The brief DARES to argue that banning the life saving drug would save women from 'reproductive control'. (x)
These 147 people would rather have women die of sepsis than let women control their own bodies. If your representatives are on this list, call them and tell their office you will be voting against them in the next election because they asked SCOTUS to throw the US medical drug system into chaos at the cost of American lives.
United States Senate
Lead Senator: Cindy Hyde-Smith (MS)
John Barrasso (WY)
Mike Braun (IN)
Katie Britt (AL)
Ted Budd (NC)
Bill Cassidy (LA)
Kevin Cramer (ND)
Mike Crapo (ID)
Ted Cruz (TX)
Steve Daines (MT)
Josh Hawley (MO)
John Hoeven (ND)
James Lankford (OK)
Mike Lee (UT)
Cynthia Lummis (WY)
Roger Marshall (KS)
Markwayne Mullin (OK)
James Risch (ID)
Marco Rubio (FL)
Rich Scott (FL)
John Thune (SD)
Tommy Tuberville (AL)
Roger Wicker (MS)
United States House of Representatives
Lead Representative: August Pfluger (TX–11)
Robert Aderholt (AL–04)
Mark Alford (MO–04)
Rick Allen (GA–12)
Jodey Arrington (TX–19)
Brian Babin (TX–36)
Troy Balderson (OH–12)
Jim Banks (IN–03)
Aaron Bean (FL–04)
Cliff Bentz (OR–02)
Jack Bergman (MI–01)
Andy Biggs (AZ–05)
Gus Bilirakis (FL–12)
Dan Bishop (NC–08)
Lauren Boebert (CO–03)
Mike Bost (IL–12)
Josh Brecheen (OK–02)
Ken Buck (CO–04)
Tim Burchett (TN–02)
Michael Burgess, M.D. (TX–26)
Eric Burlison (MO–07)
Kat Cammack (FL–03)
Mike Carey (OH–15)
Jerry Carl (AL–01)
Earl L. “Buddy” Carter (GA–01)
John Carter (TX–31)
Ben Cline (VA–06)
Michael Cloud (TX–27)
Andrew Clyde (GA–09)
Mike Collins (GA–10)
Elijah Crane (AZ–02)
Eric A. “Rick” Crawford (AR–01)
John Curtis (UT–03)
Warren Davidson (OH–08)
Monica De La Cruz (TX–15)
Jeff Duncan (SC–03)
Jake Ellzey (TX–06)
Ron Estes (KS–04)
Mike Ezell (MS–04)
Pat Fallon (TX–04)
Randy Feenstra (IA–04)
Brad Finstad (MN–01)
Michelle Fischbach (MN–07)
Scott Fitzgerald (WI–05)
Mike Flood (NE–01)
Virginia Foxx (NC–05)
Scott Franklin (FL–18)
Russell Fry (SC–07)
Russ Fulcher (ID–01)
Tony Gonzales (TX–23)
Bob Good (VA–05)
Paul Gosar (AZ–09)
Garret Graves (LA–06)
Mark Green (TN–07)
Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA–14)
H. Morgan Griffith (VA–09)
Glenn Grothman (WI–06)
Michael Guest (MS–03)
Harriet Hageman (WY)
Andy Harris, M.D. (MD–01)
Diana Harshbarger (TN–01)
Kevin Hern (OK–01)
Clay Higgins (LA–03)
Ashley Hinson (IA–02)
Erin Houchin (IN–02)
Richard Hudson (NC–09)
Bill Huizenga (MI–04)
Bill Johnson (OH–06)
Mike Johnson (LA–04)
Jim Jordan (OH–04)
Mike Kelly (PA–16)
Trent Kelly (MS–01)
Doug LaMalfa (CA–01)
Doug Lamborn (CO–05)
Nicholas Langworthy (NY–23)
Jake LaTurner (KS–02)
Debbie Lesko (AZ–08)
Barry Loudermilk (GA–11)
Blaine Luetkemeyer (MO–03)
Tracey Mann (KS–01)
Lisa McClain (MI–09)
Dr. Rich McCormick (GA–06)
Patrick McHenry (NC–10)
Carol Miller (WV–01)
Mary Miller (IL–15)
Max Miller (OH–07)
Cory Mills (FL–07)
John Moolenar (MI–02)
Alex X. Mooney (WV–02)
Barry Moore (AL–02)
Blake Moore (UT–01)
Gregory F. Murphy, M.D. (NC–03)
Troy Nehls (TX–22)
Ralph Norman (SC–05)
Andy Ogles (TN–05)
Gary Palmer (AL–06)
Bill Posey (FL–08)
Guy Reschenthaler (PA–14)
Mike Rogers (AL–03)
John Rose (TN–06)
Matthew Rosendale, Sr. (MT–02)
David Rouzer (NC–07)
Steve Scalise (LA–01)
Keith Self (TX–03)
Pete Sessions (TX–17)
Adrian Smith (NE–03)
Christopher H. Smith (NJ–04)
Lloyd Smucker (PA–11)
Pete Stauber (MN–08)
Elise Stefanik (NY–21)
Dale Strong (AL–05)
Claudia Tenney (NY–24)
Glenn Thompson (PA–15)
William Timmons, IV (SC–04)
Beth Van Duyne (TX–24)
Tim Walberg (MI–05)
Michael Waltz (FL–05)
Randy Weber, Sr. (TX–14)
Daniel Webster (FL–11)
Brad R. Wenstrup, D.P.M. (OH–02)
Bruce Westerman (AR–04)
Roger Williams (TX–25)
Joe Wilson (SC–02)
Rudy Yakym (IN–02)
If your representatives are on this list, call them and tell their office you will be voting against them in the next election because they asked SCOTUS to throw the US medical drug system into chaos at the cost of American lives.
Help to patients who have to cross state lines to get medical care by donating to your local abortion fund here. (x)
24 notes
·
View notes
it is very concerning how that the general public forgets that the argument on "abortion" and "reproductive rights" isn't isolated to the topic of "baby in the womb doing stuff".
The whole encompassing topic of body autonomy doesn't start or end at "womb" or "fetus". Those are the buzzwords that republicans love to throw around to simplify the morbid truth of this weird control train. It's what republicans prop up like a cardboard placeholder for the submerged iceberg of everything that they want to control on the topic of body and reproduction autonomy.
And this goes for men too. I know my boys like to pretend that they republicans have no interest in the peepee gun. But the republicans also think condoms and male birth control are the devils work, because dem bois are still killing babies. So when they get done with the ladies, they'll be looking at us all.
Which ties to my next point, aside from birth control measures being removed because it 'kills babies'. The whole topic is a mess because republicans idea of saving babies is for women to get married ASAP and start having babies. Messy. Topic. Bat. Shit. Insanity.
What is more batshit insane than gutting production of birth control and contraceptives, is the general focus on anything to do with the uterus or the ovarian things. Because this is the massive, whole encompassing issue here. In red states, it is difficult if not impossible to get sterilization surgery, regardless the reason. Women and people with uteruses struggle to get healthcare in red states, when their biology connected to the uterus fucks up. Even if the procedure is something that will benefit their quality of life, such as the case of Menorrhagia, Endocrine, Ovarian cysts, and various other illnesses that incapacitate or cause general disruption in health in those with a uterus. Some chemical birth controls help with managing these disorders, but sometimes that isn't enough. Some people go for a hysterectomy, but that all depends. But all of this medical hippa and body autonomy is infringed upon by republicans and red states, under the guise of "Saving babies".
These republicans put the quality and safety of a damn organ, above the person mental and physical health. It's bizarre. It's sick. People with uteruses lose full jurisdiction to their body, because by religious and state ordinance, the body is not their own property. Not fully. The uteruses may not be full of oil, but the republicans sure as hell want to stake a claim in it.
The topic is not a clear cut of black and white, regardless how simple the republican smooth brain schemes tries to posture it. It's dehumanizing and frankly, dystopian. Topics of health and wellness should be governed by no more than two people - the doctor, and the person seeking medical assistance for their body. Governors, Supreme Court, House Representatives - none of those people in those districts have a place in body autonomy regarding a singular organ. They HR, SC, Congress, whoever - they can have discussions of healthcare and affordability and the insurance coverage (which is a fuking nightmare). But when it comes to procedures that people seek to amend personal health issues, they cannot be governed by anyone not privvy to that information.
But that's just a reminder to anyone who thinks "abortion has nothing to do with me because I cannot get preggos". You miss the point it wasn't about babies or pregnancy or protecting/saving anyone. It was about controlling body health and emotional welfare.
You go to the doctors one day because you have heavy bleeding, and you get the results back from tests letting you know "there's a large tumor on your fallopian tube and it needs to be removed." It's not a simple case of scheduling the procedure, even if you have the assets to get this done and insurance that can cover it. Because there's suddenly the possibility you're actually involved in a nefarious plan to kill a baby, and everything about this procedure must be approved by your very red state, just to be sure you're not a heathen. Insurance might not even have jurisdiction to cover it, since this is happening in a red state.
But that's the gist of reproduction rights and body autonomy. It's never been about babies or saving unborn children.
82 notes
·
View notes
A white man, with his junk intact, barged into a Korean-American space and insisted that the Christian owners ignore their beliefs and let him into the women’s section. If a white woman acted that entitled she would be bashed by leftists has a “Karen”.
A Seattle court has ruled that a female-only nude spa lacks the “constitutional right” to bar males from their facilities. The decision comes after the spa sued the Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC), which had forced them to change their sex-exclusive policy due to the complaint of a transgender patron.
In May of 2020, a trans-identified male submitted a complaint to the WSHRC alleging discrimination on the basis of his gender identity.
Haven Wilvich had sought a membership at the Olympus Spa in January of 2020, but had been denied on the basis that he had not undergone “gender reassignment” surgeries and his penis was fully intact.
In the complaint, Wilvich alleged his application to use the facilities at the spa had been rejected after staff told him that “transgender women without surgery are not welcome because it could make other customers and staff uncomfortable.”
The Olympus Spa, which has locations in Lynnwood and Tacoma, is a Korean-style health and wellness facility. The spa requires nudity in some of the areas, and, as such, has been reserved for female clientele.
The owner of the spa, Myoon Woon Lee, and the spa’s president, Sun Lee, are of Korean heritage and modeled the spa after the tradition of jjimjilbang. They are also Christian, and cited their faith as a reason why they did not wish to accommodate males in the facility.
In March of 2021, the WSHRC served the spa with a Notice of Complaint of Discrimination and asked the owners to respond to the claim they had acted in a discriminatory manner. Sun Lee drafted a statement standing by their women-only rule.
Sun Lee explained that Olympus was a “family-owned women’s Korean traditional health spa” and noted that that nudity was required for certain procedures.
“We firmly believe it is essential for the safety, legal protection, and well-being of our customers and employees that we maintain adherence to this adaptation of a females-only rule,” Sun Lee wrote, also providing education on the cultural traditions of the jjimjilbang.
He concluded the response by indicating that Olympus Spa was “willing to consider a review of [its] current biological females only policy,” but that “we are unwilling to remake the ‘jjimjilbang’ haven we have worked so hard over many years to build and preserve, simply for the sake of promoting gender neutrality.”
Two weeks later, the WSHRC ruled that the spa had violated Washington anti-discrimination law, stating that the female-only policy “denies services to transgender women who have not had surgery … because their physical appearance is not ‘consistent’ with the traditional understanding of biological women.”
The spa disputed the veracity of Wilvich’s claims, asserting they had no documentation showing Wilvich had ever applied to enter the facility, and that no staff members could recall ever interacting with him.
But the WSHRC upheld their ruling, and offered the spa a Pre-Finding Settlement agreement to avoid prosecution.
The Pre-Finding Settlement required the spa to remove all references to “biological women” on their site, and provide staff with “inclusivity” training.
In March of 2022, Olympus Spa sued Andreta Armstrong, the executive director of the Washington State Human Rights Commission, asserting that the actions taken against them violated their First Amendment rights to free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of association.
But a Washington District Court dismissed their lawsuit on Monday, upholding the ruling by the WSHRC and affirming that the measures taken to prevent the spa from having a female-only policy were lawful.
The court offered Olympus Spa 30 days to amend their complaint and refile.
Haven Wilvich, the trans-identified male whose complaint resulted in the loss of the female-only space, boasted about his success on Facebook after the initial WSHRC ruling.
Wilvich, born Caleb Richmond, identifies as a “non-binary transgender woman,” and currently purports to be a Project Coordinator at Fred Hutch in the HIV Vaccine Trials Network.
In a 2020 interview, Wilvich stated he worked with clinical sites around the world on the operations of finding an effective HIV vaccine.
Wilvich is also the founder of STANCE, the Seattle Trans and Nonbinary Choral Ensemble.
In 2022, Wilvich received a $2,000 grant from the Seattle Pride Association for providing “a vocal space free of gendered expectations, by and for transgender and nonbinary singers, to explore and express themselves through music.”
Prior to his transition, Wilvich also sat on the board of the Seattle Nonbinary Collective, and described himself as a “a tall, bearded, transfemme, King County native.”
In 2018, Wilvich was featured on a Futurism podcast wherein he lauded the idea of trans-identified males being given uterus implants for the purposes of giving birth.
The podcast description reads: “When Caleb Wilvich read about the first woman in the U.S. to have a baby via a uterine transplant in early December, they were stoked. Wilvich, who uses the pronoun “they,” has always wanted to give birth, and never had a uterus.”
Wilvich is quoted as saying: “The whole process of building that bond with a child through this period of pregnancy, through the trauma and joy of childbirth, through being there from their first moments in the world… I have so many strong emotions come up when I imagine being able to do those things.”
Olympus Spa is the third Korean spa in the United States to come into the crosshairs of the gender ideology debate over the past two years.
In 2021, a Korean spa in California made international headlines after a trans-identified sex offender had been granted access to the women’s facilities in accordance with California state law.
Wi Spa, a jjimjilbang-style establishment in Los Angeles, was the subject of viral attention after a video recorded by a female patron began circulating on social media. In the video, the woman confronts spa staff because of a nude male who was exposing himself in front of women and girls in the women’s changing room.
The incident was initially dismissed as a “transphobic” hoax by progressive commentators, but would later be verified by police who issued a warrant for the arrest of Darren Agee Merager, a registered sex offender. Merager was arrested in December of 2022.
Earlier this year, a trans-identified male launched a lawsuit against a Korean spa in New Jersey, alleging discrimination after he was told he could not use the female changing rooms.
Alexandra “Allie” Goebert was denied access to the women’s section of King Spa & Sauna in Palisades Park on the basis of his sex, a move he claims was a violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD).
By Anna Slatz
Anna is the Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief at Reduxx, with a journalistic focus on covering crime, child predators, and women's rights. She lives in Canada, enjoys Opera, and kvetches in her spare time.
10 notes
·
View notes