#transgenderism is a mental disease

[pharosproject]

Ultrasound lunacy!

[mysteriesofmarcy]

Just wanted to let you know- tumblr is an EXTREMELY trans community. If you want more attention go to Twitter or Instagram or some shit

I'm aware.

[ireblogthetruth]

Check out this conversation with the last person I reblogged from:

People like this are the reason this blog exists in the first place!

[mysterycharacterbracket]

Just three friendly reminders:

A) This blog is run by a Christian. They means that, no matter my personal feelings about you and your lifestyle choices, you are welcome here.

B) I am not a terf. That would make me a radical feminist, which I am not.

C) Doing this only proves that you yourself are the intolerant one that you claim I am.

[mybeautifulchristianjourney]

Why I Do Not Celebrate “LGBTQ+ Pride Month” But Mourn It

by Robert A.J. Gagnon

Not only is pride generally a sin, but also there is nothing to be proud of in the so-called "LGBTQ+ Pride Month." Let us love persons with same-sex attractions and gender-identity dysphoria by rejecting that facet of their existence that dishonors the persons whom God has created in his image.

We should also show sympathy for their struggle with sinful desires, and applaud the way God can use the mortification of such desires to deepen a relationship with himself and others. Yet no one should take pride in such desires or the behavior that follows from gratifying them.

I. What is there to be proud of?

Why should one take pride in being erotically aroused by the distinctives of one's own sex, which is either narcissism or self-deception (viz., the failure to apprehend that one is already fully one's own sex)?

Should people also take pride in being erotically aroused by close kin (incest, i.e., attraction to a kinship same, akin to attraction to a sexual same) or by multiple persons concurrently (which Jesus rejected based on the logic of God's intentional creation of a sexual binary)?

Why should one take pride in rejecting the messaging of one's body as designed by God by identifying with a "gender" at odds with one's biological sex? A complaint against one's Creator is nothing to be proud of, but rather an expression of idolatry.

II. Social harm and the condemnation of Scripture

The "queer" lifestyle is one marked by disproportionately high rates for sexually transmitted disease and higher numbers of sex partners (especially for homosexual males), as well as higher relational turnover and increased mental health problems (especially for homosexual females).

These risks correlate with known male-female differences; expected results when an intimate relationship lacks true sexual counterparts or complements. Same-sex unions don't moderate the extremes of a given sex; they ratchet them up; don't fill in the gaps, but widen the breach.

Scripture (including Jesus and the apostolic witness to him) views homosexual practice and transgenderism as abhorrent sexual immorality ("abominations") that can get unrepentant offenders excluded from God's kingdom. Such behaviors assault the foundation of sexual ethics as defined by Jesus himself, his Scripture, and his apostles.

III. The dangers of “LGBTQ+” politics

The "LGBTQ+" political agenda is the most illiberal and hateful agenda in politics today. It is characterized by efforts to stifle free speech and the free exercise of religion. It is the greatest threat to these freedoms in the Western world today, and has been for decades.

No political lobby has concentrated more on canceling and censoring others, indoctrinating school children, and even mandating compelled speech (the hallmark of totalitarians). People's jobs are being put at risk who dissent from "LGBTQ+" dogma: teachers, doctors, nurses, psychologists, florists, photographers, small business owners, lawyers, corporate executives, etc.

Children are being directed toward chemical castration and mutilation surgery, an obvious instance of child abuse being pushed by the state. Indeed, the state is now moving in the direction of regarding parents who fail to affirm their child's "LGBTQ+" identity as perpetrating child abuse (we know who the real child abusers are), requiring the state's intervention to take your own child away from you.

Men identifying falsely as women are invading women's restrooms, locker rooms, sports, shelters, and prisons, even being celebrated with misogynistic awards declaring them to be better women than real women.

The very idea of faithful Christian education is being put at risk, with calls for tying federal student loans, grants, and accreditation toward lock-step compliance with "LGBTQ+" ideology.

IV. Moral rot and true love

Science is suffering at the hands of a movement that teaches that men too can have periods and give birth. A gnostic spirit pervades the land, declaring entrapment in bodies not designed to express their sexually immoral desires.

This is not a month to be "proud" but rather a month to mourn. Mourn the moral rot pervading our country. It has harmed not only the nation as a whole, but especially those who in their self-delusion celebrate what is injurious to themselves, and to their relationship with others and God.

As Paul told the Corinthians, they should not be "puffed up" or "inflated with pride" over their ability to tolerate an egregious act of sexual immorality (there a case of adult-consensual incest). To support the "queer" life is a manifestation of functional hate, not love.

Therefore, I choose rather to love, to love truly, those who identify as "gay," "lesbian," "bisexual," and "transgender," rejoicing in the truth rather than in the lie, whatever the cost for doing so.

[divisionofsimilarities]

Transgenderism and Dementia

I don't think this is talked about enough, but this reminds of a core flaw that is present in the trans community: An inability to think about the long terms effects of their life altering decisions.

I will preface by saying that I have no problem with trans people on an individual basis and I do feel that in the real world, most of them are just regular people who want to live out their lives. The TRAs and the other groups of people who have co-opted that particular community are a selfish minority, one of which will likely deny the reality of their life choices until the bitter end.

With all that said, I would like to thank @religion-is-a-mental-illness for their post on this topic for inspiring me to create this post.

I've found a few articles which some might find fascinating:

LGBTQ+: Living with Dementia

Forgotten lives: Trans older adults living with dementia at the intersection of cisgenderism, ableism/cogniticism and ageism

STUDY SUGGESTS MEMORY AND THINKING DECLINE IN TRANSGENDER ADULTS

Dementia care advice for transgender patients drawn up

Transgender Adults More Likely to Experience Subjective Cognitive Decline, Depression

New research shows transgender and nonbinary people could be at higher risk of late-life Alzheimer's disease

'Alarming' Data on Early Cognitive Decline in Transgender Adults

Dementia in transgender population: case vignette

Life as a transgender woman with dementia: ‘LGBT people face particular challenges’

Dementia regression for trans people 'could cause distress' - BBC News

Living in fear of dementia as a transgender woman | CBC Radio

The last two links aren't news articles but I figured that anyone reading this might find them fascinating nonetheless.

If you get dementia, alzheimer or something like that can you forget you're trans? - r/honesttransgender

Trans people with Alzheimer’s - r/ask_transgender

[a-room-of-my-own]

The FDA hasn’t approved them for gender dysphoria, and their effects are serious and permanent.

The fashion for transgenderism has brought with it a new euphemism: “gender-affirming care,” which means surgical and pharmacological interventions designed to make the body look and feel more like that of the opposite sex. Gender-affirming care for children involves the use of “puberty blockers”: one of five powerful synthetic drugs that block the natural production of sex hormones.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved those medications to treat prostate cancer, endometriosis, certain types of infertility and a rare childhood disease caused by a genetic mutation. But it has never approved them for gender dysphoria, the clinical term for the belief that one’s body is the wrong sex.

Thus the drugs, led by AbbVie’s Lupron, are prescribed to minors “off label.” (They are also used off-label for chemical castration of repeat sex offenders.) Off-label dispensing is legal; some half of all prescriptions in the U.S. are for off-label uses. But off-label use circumvents the FDA’s authority to examine drug safety and efficacy, especially when the patients are children. Some U.S. states have eliminated the need for parental consent for teens as young as 15 to start puberty blockers.

Proponents of puberty blockers contend there is little downside. The Department of Health and Human Services claims puberty blockers are “reversible.” It omits the evidence that “by impeding the usual process of sexual orientation and gender identity development,” these drugs “effectively ‘lock in’ children and young people to a treatment pathway,” according to a report by Britain’s National Health Service, which cites studies finding that 96% to 98% of minors prescribed puberty blockers proceed to cross-sex hormones.

Gender advocates also falsely contend that puberty blockers for children and teens have been “used safely since the late 1980s,” as a recent Scientific American article put it. That ignores substantial evidence of harmful long-term side effects.

The Center for Investigative Reporting revealed in 2017 that the FDA had received more than 10,000 adverse event reports from women who were given Lupron off-label as children to help them grow taller. They reported thinning and brittle bones, teeth that shed enamel or cracked, degenerative spinal disks, painful joints, radical mood swings, seizures, migraines and suicidal thoughts. Some developed fibromyalgia. There were reports of fertility problems and cognitive issues.

The FDA in 2016 ordered AbbVie to add a warning that children on Lupron might develop new or intensified psychiatric problems. Transgender children are at least three times as likely as the general population to have anxiety, depression and neurodevelopmental disorders. Last year, the FDA added another warning for children about the risk of brain swelling and vision loss.

The lack of research demonstrating that benefits outweigh the risks has resulted in some noteworthy pushback in the U.S. and abroad. Republican legislatures in a dozen states have curtailed or banned gender-affirming care for minors. Finland, citing concerns about side effects, in 2020 cut back puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to minors. Sweden followed suit in 2022 and Norway this year. Britain’s National Health Service shuttered the country’s largest youth gender clinic after 35 clinicians resigned over three years, complaining they were pressured to overdiagnose gay, mentally ill, and autistic teens and prescribe medications that made their conditions worse.

Still, the U.S. and most European countries embrace a standard of care that pushes youngsters toward “gender-affirming” treatments. It circumvents “watchful waiting” and talk therapy and diagnoses many children as gender dysphoric when they may simply be going through a phase.

Gender-affirming care for children is undoubtedly a flashpoint in America’s culture wars. It is also a human experiment on children and teens, the most vulnerable patients. Ignoring the long-term dangers posed by unrestricted off-label dispensing of powerful puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, combined with the large overdiagnosis of minors as gender dysphoric, borders on child abuse.

[crazycatsiren]

The fact that transphobes will call transgenderism a "mental disease" and label anybody they don't like/anybody who refuses to tolerate their bigotry as "mentally ill" really tells you all you need to know about the whole full circle of transphobia, ableism, sanism, and eugenics. It's white supremacy spinning around and around, plain and simple.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: Gerald Posner

Published: Jun 7, 2023

The fashion for transgenderism has brought with it a new euphemism: “gender-affirming care,” which means surgical and pharmacological interventions designed to make the body look and feel more like that of the opposite sex. Gender-affirming care for children involves the use of “puberty blockers”: one of five powerful synthetic drugs that block the natural production of sex hormones.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved those medications to treat prostate cancer, endometriosis, certain types of infertility and a rare childhood disease caused by a genetic mutation. But it has never approved them for gender dysphoria, the clinical term for the belief that one’s body is the wrong sex.

Thus the drugs, led by AbbVie’s Lupron, are prescribed to minors “off label.” (They are also used off-label for chemical castration of repeat sex offenders.) Off-label dispensing is legal; some half of all prescriptions in the U.S. are for off-label uses. But off-label use circumvents the FDA’s authority to examine drug safety and efficacy, especially when the patients are children. Some U.S. states have eliminated the need for parental consent for teens as young as 15 to start puberty blockers.

Proponents of puberty blockers contend there is little downside. The Department of Health and Human Services claims puberty blockers are “reversible.” It omits the evidence that “by impeding the usual process of sexual orientation and gender identity development,” these drugs “effectively ‘lock in’ children and young people to a treatment pathway,” according to a report by Britain’s National Health Service, which cites studies finding that 96% to 98% of minors prescribed puberty blockers proceed to cross-sex hormones.

Gender advocates also falsely contend that puberty blockers for children and teens have been “used safely since the late 1980s,” as a recent Scientific American article put it. That ignores substantial evidence of harmful long-term side effects.

The Center for Investigative Reporting revealed in 2017 that the FDA had received more than 10,000 adverse event reports from women who were given Lupron off-label as children to help them grow taller. They reported thinning and brittle bones, teeth that shed enamel or cracked, degenerative spinal disks, painful joints, radical mood swings, seizures, migraines and suicidal thoughts. Some developed fibromyalgia. There were reports of fertility problems and cognitive issues.

The FDA in 2016 ordered AbbVie to add a warning that children on Lupron might develop new or intensified psychiatric problems. Transgender children are at least three times as likely as the general population to have anxiety, depression and neurodevelopmental disorders. Last year, the FDA added another warning for children about the risk of brain swelling and vision loss.

The lack of research demonstrating that benefits outweigh the risks has resulted in some noteworthy pushback in the U.S. and abroad. Republican legislatures in a dozen states have curtailed or banned gender-affirming care for minors. Finland, citing concerns about side effects, in 2020 cut back puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to minors. Sweden followed suit in 2022 and Norway this year. Britain’s National Health Service shuttered the country’s largest youth gender clinic after 35 clinicians resigned over three years, complaining they were pressured to overdiagnose gay, mentally ill, and autistic teens and prescribe medications that made their conditions worse.

Still, the U.S. and most European countries embrace a standard of care that pushes youngsters toward “gender-affirming” treatments. It circumvents “watchful waiting” and talk therapy and diagnoses many children as gender dysphoric when they may simply be going through a phase.

Gender-affirming care for children is undoubtedly a flashpoint in America’s culture wars. It is also a human experiment on children and teens, the most vulnerable patients. Ignoring the long-term dangers posed by unrestricted off-label dispensing of powerful puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, combined with the large overdiagnosis of minors as gender dysphoric, borders on child abuse.

==

Gender thalidomide.

[variousqueerthings]

2017: Denmark was the first country to remove transgenderism from the list of disease diagnoses, so that being transgendered is no longer equated with having mental and behavioural disorders.

a short timeline (of danish LGBT rights)

[coochiequeens]

Why safe guard the blood supply when the American Red Cross could go along with the “prioritization of the perceptional world of mentally ill people”?

Concerns have been raised about adjustments to the eligibility criteria for people to donate blood to The American Red Cross, which is now allowing donors to self-declare their biological sex.

According to the American Red Cross website, the organization says it “understand[s] that there is a difference between biological sex and gender,” but goes on to clarify that the Red Cross is following the recommendations of the FDA to determine donor eligibility on the basis of self-declared sex, as opposed to biological sex of the potential donors.

This change would allow a homosexual or bisexual male to present at the clinic and self-describe himself as “female” or “trans” and be exempted from the 3-month deferral typically associated with males who actively engage in sexual activity with other males. This may pose a risk to both the Red Cross staff, the donor, and the viability of blood donations.

Previously, there were certain restrictions on donations based on the sex and sexual orientation of prospective donors. On their website, the Red Cross defers to the FDA in decision making, and claims it “recognizes the hurt this policy has caused to many in the LGBTQ+ community” and is pushing for change. Eligibility rules are gradually being removed though some still remain.

Specific criteria for men who have sex with men (MSM) was created due to the higher rates transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases amongst gay and bisexual males. As a result, men are restricted from donating if they have had sex with another man within a 3-month period. Lesbians are exempted from this deferral, as are bisexual women contingent on the sexual behavior of a male partner. 

A member of the Reduxx team called the Red Cross Donor and Client Support Center posing as a biological male who identified as a woman to check eligibility requirements. When the agent was asked if a person “assigned male at birth” who was actively having sex with other biological males was able to donate blood, he responded that so long as the potential donor self-declared their sex as “female,” they would be allowed.

“If you identify as a female… if you answer the question as a female, anything that’s going to come up– regarding the transgenderism… is not going to apply,” the agent stated, after consulting with his managerial team for several minutes. 

Similarly under the rules, females who identify as “men” and who have sex with biological males or other females who identify as “men” are ineligible and subject to the 3-month deferral.

Males who identify as “female” and have sex with other males who identify as “female” are eligible to donate under the lesbian guidelines. 

The policy of self-identification applies to all forms of blood, plasma, and platelet donation, which contradicts The Red Cross’ weight and height requirements for donors on the basis of sex. Regular donors are also allowed to have information on their sex changed upon verbal confirmation, which the Red Cross perplexingly claims is for the sake of “donor safety and accuracy of records.” Individuals do not need to declare that they are transgender. 

Commentators have highlighted the logical inconsistencyof allowing donations on the basis of self-identified “sex,” with others on social media expressing concern about safeguarding the blood supply. 

Evolutionary biologists Heather E. Heying and Bret Weinstein recently blasted the guidance on a recent episode of their podcast, breaking down the policy.

“So all you would have to do if wanted to donate blood and thus potentially corrupt the blood supply, is walk in… and so long as you have not tried this before and admitted you’re actually a man, and [say] ‘nope, I’m a woman,’ they will let you donate blood,” Heying explains after reading through the Red Cross website.

“It’s the ultimate proof that this entire societal disorder — whatever it is — amounts to the prioritization of the perceptual world over reality,” Weinstein comments. 

“… and then it’s the prioritization of the perceptional world of mentally ill people,” Heying adds.

According to the Red Cross, there is a “window” of time during which blood donation screening may not detect the presence of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. The window is “an approximate period of 7 to 10 days” for men who are not taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or other antiretroviral medications. Other infectious diseases, such as Hepatitis C, may take up to a week to become detectable in donated blood.

The CDC recently reported that a multi-year study of trans-identified males living in Atlanta, Los Angeles, New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and Seattle found that 42% of respondents were positive for HIV.

When approached by Reduxx with an inquiry as to its policy, the American Red Cross directed us to the FDA guidance, which prompted the eligibility change, a link to their LGBT eligibility page, and to a recently-updated “American Red Cross Statement on FDA MSM Deferral Policy” which describes how the policies surrounding donor eligibility may be changed in the near future.

“The American Red Cross seeks to build an inclusive environment that embraces diversity for all those who engage with our lifesaving mission. As such the Red Cross believes blood donation eligibility should not be determined by methods that are based upon sexual orientation and is committed to working with partners toward achieving this goal.”

By Bryndís Blackadder Bryndís is a contributing journalist at Reduxx with a focus on free speech and the law. She lives in Scotland, where she enjoys creating documentaries, multimedia art, and advocating for human rights.

[mysteriesofmarcy]

Are you okay. Like are you genuinely okay.

Why do you think its okay to be hateful to other people

I don't. But you do.

[ireblogthetruth]

(This was a comment on a previous post)

Yes of course, attempting to turn people away from a path that often leads directly to sending oneself to a godless eternity of torture is definitely terrorism.

[papirouge]

Lol the stories about the child sacrifice and abortion parallels plus the boy wanting and mutilating himself to be an animatronic as a trans allegory are pretty based and at least the last one seems quite likely to be based on that if the original creator was the one who came up with the idea. how in hell did people even find out he was a registered republican voter? how do you even register yourself as a voter for a particular party?? in my country, things don't work like that so I'm lost. your vote is completely confidencial so it shouldn't be possible for anyone to know such info unless someone close to him decided to spill the beans.

I think i've heard before something about the creator of fnaf being cancelled but for some reason I had the idea it was for being christian, perhaps i'm confusing him with another game creator...

like i said i only play minecraft and pokeymon, but notch, the creator of minecraft, has also had his heated gamer moments too. he said trans women aren't women, he said people who didnt believe in a straight pride parade deserved to be shot, said feminism was a social disease and called a feminist a cunt, said there was nothing wrong about white pride (then later kinda recanted by saying something like "I didnt know there were only some groups allowed to feel proud of who they are"), and something else about not giving in to mentall illness in reference to transgenderism, though later kinda apologized saying he didnt understand trans identities very well. obviously, references to his name got erased in many products and even the game itself, only visible once after you beat the ender dragon, and microsoft banned him from their events ever since.

pokemon creators havent had these type of controversies which i attribute to having a better pr team and not growing up alongside social media and decide it's a great idea to post any thought that passes through their head. theyve had some though, like with jynx believed to be a racial stereotype (supposedly though she's based on ganguro fashion and the "fat lady" of an opera) so her skin was changed from black to purple. interestingly, ludicolo is a very obvious mexican stereotype yet nobody cares lol.

i do think its kinda funny when these authors get cancelled but they stil keep them/their product around to milk it to death.

and I might or might not watch the video. ive watched some youtube essays before but never that long, so we'll see...

I mean only mentally ill people like me would be dedicated to watch a 9 hours lore video essay, so I don't blame you anon lol

I am too very confused about the registred political alignement thing but I gues that's yet another dystopian US lunacy. In my country this stuff doesn't exist neither. I heard some celebrities/influencer get flack for being Republican (Jaclyn Hill comes to mind) but I have no idea how people/haters manage to get this information. I guess they are available on public record or stuff like that.

Since FNAF has a VERY dedicated fandom, I am not surprised some fans went as far as to sleuth this info out.

That minecraft guy sounds like a legit asshole though and he deserved to be canceled idc I HATE when people make foul out of themselves for the whole world to see, and then act shook when people don't want to have anything to do with them anymore. I hope he didn't have the audacity to whine about "Mh fReeDoM oF sPeeCh" because dude was apparently saying it was ok to kill people for having disagreeing opinions🙃

On the opposite, Scott Cawthon is SUPER lowkey & private and never explicitely said anything rude or insulting. People just started hating him for being Republican and allegedly Christian (which I think nobody found actual evidence of)

And animatronic aren't allegory of trans people, it was only the B-7 story of a boy butchering himself as one. The whole FNAF story is Scott Cawthon creation. He just co-writes the book with a female author, but only him creates the lore. Animatronics are regular robot who are possessed by the spirit of dead children.

I didn't know they changed Jynx color 'o' I never thought anything about this design - I felt like she didn't even have skin, but but more like a void lmao (like these spectre type pokemon)

I roll my eyes at article defending this design à la "oooh but Sugiomori didn't want to offend anyone uwu" ok but Pokémon is now a game with an INTERNATIONAL audience. If Nintendo wants to keep making bucks out of their game, they have to adapt themselves to foreign audience. This sort of "purity complex" when it comes from japanese cultural assets coming into the West is insufferable. No culture is immune to criticism.

Ganguro started around 1996 which is the year when the first Pokémon game came out...so I highly doubt Sugimori would be already aware of this trend during the game development. Japan already had a weird thing with dark/black skin, so Jynx simply might be yet another design celebrating this brand of "quirkiness".

[eerveh]

Reasons to Hate the US: Everyone in the government are out-of-touch, corrupt, ignorant old men who care way more about money and power than they do about people. The President has little to no control on what happens, they’re merely a puppet. Every system you can think of is horrible. Mental Health, Medical, Education, Judicial, you name it. Half the country hates anyone who isn’t Christian, white, straight and cis and wants them dead. This half is called “The South”. Southerners tend to be pretty vile people with good Southerners being very rare.  Every single year, some asshat in the government tries to pass a bill that would make the US 1000x worse, like this year, they’re trying to, basically, ban transgenderism. Healthcare is not free or cheap, and can very easily make you bankrupt, especially if you end up with some life-threatening illness or injury like Cancer, Asthma, Diabetes, Heart Disease and such. Cost of Living is high, even crappy apartments are too expensive. It’s also nearly impossible for someone who is very poor to eat healthy, which results in obesity. Shootings are insanely common, making doing literally anything in public a high risk. You could be just shopping or whatever and some dude pops up to shoot your ass down along with 20 some-odd others for no absolute reason. 

[badbirdnews]

It has come to light that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under President Joe Biden has been actively

This is the extent to which our society has fallen, where the very institution responsible for protecting the health and well-being of our children is now endorsing dangerous medical interventions. The departmental documents clearly indicate that HHS is not only supportive of transgenderism but is actively advocating for it. Can you believe it? Our government is now in the business of pushing a radical agenda, disregarding the potential consequences on the physical and mental health of our vulnerable young ones.

But that’s not all. While HHS is busy promoting these controversial medical interventions, they are also funding research into how these interventions could impact various health risks. It’s truly mind-boggling! Instead of focusing on finding cures for diseases like cancer or Alzheimer’s, our tax dollars are being wasted on studying the potential side effects of transgender medical interventions. We have reached a point where the priorities of our government are completely skewed.

Federal spending records reveal that HHS has allocated funds to investigate the impacts of transgender medical interventions on cancer, recurring headaches, bacterial infections, stunted skeletal development, and Alzheimer’s among other things, This begs the question: why are we prioritizing such research over other pressing health concerns? It seems that our government is more interested in pushing an ideological agenda than in addressing real health issues faced by millions of Americans.

This alarming situation calls for immediate action. We cannot stand idly by as our government endangers the well-being of our children and diverts resources away from critical healthcare needs. The HHS must be held accountable for its reckless promotion of hormone therapy among minors and its misplaced priorities in funding research. It is time for us to demand transparency and responsible decision-making from our elected officials. The future of our nation’s health depends on it.

My opinion was inspired from this source: https://www.wnd.com/2024/03/biden-hhs-pushed-child-sex-changes-funding-research-transgender-health-risks/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=biden-hhs-pushed-child-sex-changes-funding-research-transgender-health-risks