hi! in case you don’t know me, i’m winnie, and i intend on becoming the new game theory!
ever since its release, fnaf 4 has been one of the most widely disputed games in terms of lore. nobody can agree. some still think that mike was the bite victim. some people believe in dream theory (which was totally the original plan, in all honesty).
but i am here to present an all-new theory that completely changes how fnaf will be viewed forever. there have been many details in fnaf 4 that have been inconsistent with the rest of the franchise. the animatronics are just spring bonnie and fredbear, not our usual cast. it doesn’t take place in an office setting. toy chica isn’t hot. michael afton (or at least, who he is presumed to be) has melanin, which would mean that fnaf 5 whitewashed the shit out of him.
so here it is: fnaf 4 is not canon to the rest of the franchise. it’s a red herring to distract from the actual lore drop, fnaf world. this is not the only game i have reason to believe is not canon. fnaf ar is also not canon, not for any particular reason; i just don’t like it, so it’s not ❤️. the roblox early release game is canon and actually fits neatly into into where fnaf 4 should be.
additionally, william afton was the bite victim. all the games are from his perspective, where he hallucinates animatronics haunting him because of the damage the bite did to his brain.
but that’s just a theory. a game theory. thanks for reading.
i would have suuuch a bad time if i lived in adventure time i would eat a hot dog and it would turn out to be a princess or whatever and i’d plead diplomatic immunity but the cop is a banana who has only ever been taught capital punishment by his war crime lesbian overlord and then i would get publicly guillotined in the candy kingdom and the last thing i ever heard before my head fell off would be a teen boy going “oh my björk that was hella wooble shambalooby!”
even though crowley and aziraphale did kiss, if they hadn’t, it wouldn’t have been queerabaiting. it never was queerbaiting because it has been expressly clear since season 1 (and in the novel!) that aziraphale and crowley are in love with each other. just because they didn’t hold hands, or cuddle, or do anything that our society deems necessary to be considered “romantic” doesn’t mean that they weren’t. you shouldn’t have needed the kiss to prove to you that they were in love. im glad we got to see them kiss. im over the moon! i’m glad we’re getting good and complex representation. im glad their story isn’t over yet. but i promise, there was never going to be any queerbaiting because good omens is inherently a queer love story.
thinking about how crowley did not know how to shoot a gun.
he didnt know how to shoot, let alone hold, a gun, and yet he agreed to do the catching bullet trick. it’s not like aziraphale could’ve pocked anyone else, anyways. obviously, they would be fine; they’re immortal beings, they had miracles on their side, and worst case scenario they just had some paperwork on their hands.
but perhaps deeper than that, crowley would do anything for aziraphale. even point a loaded gun at him without knowing what he was doing.
and when aziraphale realizes that crowley doesn’t know what he’s doing and that the miracles aren’t working, the former doesn’t stop the magic show. he doesn’t back down. because he knows that crowley could never hurt him, not even unintentionally.
they’re all each other have. they’d kill and die for each other because they love each other. it’s a love impossible to understand because it defies all logic. it’s a love impossible to measure because it stretches from the beginning of time to the end of it.
if crowley could bring himself to shoot at the love of his life despite having no idea how, he can find him again. heaven and hell can’t keep them apart. it’s ineffable.