cinesaver

[cinesaver]

Spike Lee’s Oscar Moment: The BlacKkKlansman Movie Review

          Spike Lee has made some unforgettable films like Do The Right Thing and Malcolm X, but unfortunately, he has yet to truly get recognition at the Oscars. His latest film has received five nominations including best director, best supporting actor, and best picture. Does The BlacKkKlansman have what it takes to give Spike Lee the recognition he deserves, or should he just go back to the drawing board?

The Plot

          The BlacKkKlansman tells the true story of the first African American detective in Colorado Springs. While he investigates the local Klan group, he finds that he must go undercover in order to stop a brewing terrorist plot. He does this by teaming up with his white surrogate partner to stand in for him in person, while he communicates with these men over the telephone.

          The BlacKkKlansman is not only one of Spike Lee’s best films in years, but probably one of his best films period. This story simply lends itself to a director like Spike Lee, who is no stranger to a film with a message like this. That being said he creates a movie that is both extremely entertaining while never relenting on its point. I would certainly love to see Spike Lee get the award for best director for this film.

          The BlacKkKlansman has an interesting style as it fully dedicates itself to the time period. This can be seen through its clothes, camera style, and even the score which sounds like an old 70s crime film. This allows the movie to form its own identity when its compared to the other films that are up for best picture.

          The film does a good job providing parallels in its story that lead to very interesting scenes. What I mean by this is that the film is constantly presenting scenes of what the undercover agent is seeing as he attends local klan meetings and then jumping to what his partner sees at the local student-run activist group. This allows the audience to see what injustices were being committed and how groups were fighting it. All in all these scenes are the most memorable and well put together moments of the film.  

The Cast and Characters

          The films leading role is played by a relative newcomer in John David Washington, who is actually the son of Denzel Washington. John’s presence on screen sets himself apart from his fathers by showing a more comedic range, which never diminishes his serious moments. This is a great breakout performance that makes me want to see the actor more in the future.

          The BlacKkKlansman is nominated for best supporting actor for Adam Driver for his portrayal of the white surrogate investigator. Driver once again gives a performance that continues to impress. The film allows him to really act like different characters. His actual persona and the persona given to him for the undercover investigation. Driver's character also gives a strong conflict for the film because his character is actually Jewish. This struggle allows the audience to truly feel the pain of denying his beliefs for the investigation. Though I don’t think he will win the award, I do believe this is a great film and performance he can add to his already impressive resume.

The Verdict

          The BlacKkKlansman sets itself apart from the other films in the best picture category with its undeniable style, great performances, and a true story that seems so outrageous that it’s hard to believe it actually happened. The film has a strong message, complete with an ending that should truly resonate with a modern audience. I wouldn’t put money on this film winning best picture but I feel like it is time for the Academy to recognize Spike Lee. I would recommend you see this film at full price.

[cinesaver]

Don’t Stop Me Now: Bohemian Rhapsody Movie Review

          It's surprising to think that films haven't been made about some of the greatest bands in history. For what seems like years these films have rattled around the rumor-sphere but have yet to make it past its conception. Now it's time to go all in and explore the story of Freddie Mercury and Queen in the latest biopic. Will Bohemian Rhapsody give fans of the band what they have been craving, or should they keep hoping for a film that the band deserves?

The Plot

          Bohemian Rhapsody tells the origin story of the band Queen, but more specifically the life story of their frontman Freddie Mercury.  

          Bohemian Rhapsody is one of those films that may not be perfect but is simply a blast to watch. It’s now nominated for five Oscars which include best picture and best leading actor, which may come as a surprise because as much as I love this film it still leaves me feeling that it’s not quite the quality that Oscar films are used to. That being said after my second viewing of the film I realized more why people are in love it, and simply put why the academy put it there. It’s because there is a stellar performance, great music, and an unbelievable attention to detail.

          Bohemian Rhapsody does a good job with its authenticity when it recreates the famous concert scenes like the famous Live Aid performance. The actors perform just like Queen did in that point in time along with expert recreations of the set, costumes, and overall feel of the performance. These scenes are where the film flourishes.  

          The one flaw that seemed to stick out to me is that the film is pretty self-aware at times which comes off a little too tongue and cheek. What I mean by this is that there are multiple times throughout the film that characters will say things like "No one will ever listen to Queen" or "This song will never be a hit" in a comedic fashion because obviously both of these statements are wrong. This is a minor complaint but the self-aware nature of it kind of took me out of the film.  

The Cast and Characters  

          Like I mentioned earlier, one of the biggest selling points for the film is its great performance from its leading actor Rami Malek, who is best known for his Mr. Robot fame. Malek does an incredible job getting Mercury’s mannerisms, speech patterns, and overall look. Even going as far as to wearing fake teeth to give him that extra piece of authenticity. Malek shows his range by creating a stage presence that is never boring to watch, while also presenting a tragic character that the audience can get behind. Malek is the best part of this film and most likely the only award it will win at the Oscars if it gets any.

          The rest of the cast does a suitable job in the film, with Lucy Boynton giving a notable performance as Freddie's dear friend Mary Austin. Boynton is given more time and simply more to work with than the other characters in the band, which is probably a good thing because it allows us to dive deeper into the personal life of Freddie Mercury.  

The Verdict  

          Bohemian Rhapsody is the film that the legendary band deserves mostly because it fully represents their songbook. Upbeat, fun, and at times a little outlandish. Malek gives a performance that truly sells this film and is most likely why it is up for the best picture of the year. It has already won the best drama film at the Golden Globes, which they hope will catapult them into a big win at the Oscars. Though I don’t think this film will win the award, I still would recommend you see it at full price.

[cinesaver]

Oscar Favorite?: The Favourite Movie Review

          Oscar-worthy films always use the best A-List talent, which of course explains why they are nominated. Every year the same actors will be seen nominated for roles in new films that push their already great abilities. In this case, Emma Stone returns to the awards with her supporting role in the period piece comedy titled The Favourite. Will this cast of regulars leave the Oscars with the award for best picture, or will it simply get lost behind other academy favorites?

The Plot

          The Favourite centers on a power struggle that involves two workers and the queen of England in the early 18th century. The question of who really is in control is brought forth when the two workers scheme and plan for the right to be in the room with the Queen.

          The Favourite is definitely a stranger film than the others up or best picture. It is unusual to see a period piece that focuses more on comedy than it does on drama. This makes The Favourite somewhat of a mixed bag because at times you can’t take it seriously, which then is a stark contrast to the moments that are overly serious. It’s as if the film struggles with what it wants to be.

          The film does boast gorgeous visuals with its beautiful landscapes and locations. It must also be said that the films use of natural light and untraditional camera lenses make the shots pop and help immerse the audience in the film.

          The film's comedy is, in lack of better terms, irreverent which isn't a problem for me but might alienate audiences. That being said I found myself laughing quite a bit at the absurdity of the situations created in this film. This, of course, is surprising because the Oscars aren't always known for their sense of humor.  

          A minor complaint about the story of the film is that it doesn't fully explain the time period or setting which would have been helpful when trying to understand the plot. The film does also provide an ending that does seem a tad out of place. It's as if the filmmakers simply didn't know how to end the film.

The Cast and Characters

          The Favourite boasts ten nominations, which is only matched by Roma. This includes a nomination for best actress in a leading role for Olivia Colman in her role as the Queen. Colman provides a performance that shows her comedic timing and dedication to the role. She shows a range from intimidating to even childlike. Her presence pushes the film even when her character is aggravating.

          Emma Stone and Rachel Weisz are both nominated for best-supporting actress for their roles of the characters competing for the Queen's attention. Stone and Weisz show sadistic chemistry that pushes the characters to the edge, which makes it hard for the audience to pick a side. Each performance is a good stepping stone that is out of their wheelhouse.  

The Verdict

          The Favourite is a step away from other Oscar-nominated films due to its somewhat strange and comedic story. The film excels in its production and acting, but simply can only do so much for a script that seems to be lacking. It seems the film almost has an identity crisis as it struggles to understand what type of film it would like to be. This complete with a strange and somewhat jarring conclusion makes The Favourite an odd nomination for the Oscar, especially when you look at the films that weren't included on the list. That being said this is still an impressive and entertaining film that I recommend you see this film at a discounted price.

[cinesaver]

A Best Picture From The Comfort Of Your Home: Roma Movie Review

          Netflix has long hoped to create original films that could compete with theatrical features, a feat that seemed to be hopeless after multiple flops in regards to their reviews. To change that stigma, the streaming service sets its eyes on a new goal. Not only to encourage audiences to watch their original content, but also take home the award for best picture of the year. With an aggressive advertisement push, Roma has achieved ten nominations including best foreign film and best picture. Will Roma be the first film on a streaming service to take the coveted award home, or will audiences rather spend a night out at the theater?

The Plot

          Roma presents a slice of life story that takes place in Mexico during the1970's. The main character, Cleo, is a maid who becomes unexpectedly pregnant as she continues her duty to the family.

          Roma sets itself apart from the other nominated films with its untraditional story structure. Much like last year's Oscar-nominated film, Call Me By Your Name,  Roma fully dedicates itself to a slice of life storyline. This creates a film that is successful at representing what life was like, but at the same time, the film doesn't provide an interesting and engaging story. This is a long film, which maxes out at 2 hours and 15 minutes, and doesn’t seem to go anywhere. I realize this seems to be an unpopular opinion, but this is a slow film that is a difficult recommendation for a typical film viewer.

          One interesting aspect of this film's story is the perspective it gives, which is that of the maid Cleo. The story of the family must be put together from overheard conversations that are always behind closed doors. This makes the audience feel as if they are in the shoes of Cleo, as they slowly piece together the family's inner struggle.  

           The biggest draw for Roma is its production, more specifically the direction of Alfonso Cuarón. For a film that is shot in black and white, it is amazing to see how pretty some of the shots can be. There are interesting and untraditional shots given throughout the whole film, which really is why this film is nominated.

          A strange downfall that this film had for me is the fact that I had to watch this at home. I understand there was trouble with the rights to show it between theaters and Netflix, which is a shame because I found that sitting at home did this film no justice. The whole experience left me feeling less immersed than the other films in the best picture category. This makes me fear the transition of big theatrical releases being showcased on streaming services rather than a theater.

The Cast and Characters

          Roma is nominated for ten Oscars, two of which are for lead actress and supporting actress. Playing the role of Cleo is Yalitza Aparicio. This is Aparicio’s first role in any film which makes the nomination all the more all the more impressive. Aparicio presents a character that is so under spoken that it is hard to truly relate to her. This doesn’t mean she does a bad job in the role, there are some truly difficult scenes she performs that look very impressive. She just isn't given enough to do on screen that would make me believe she will walk away with the award.

          Nominated for her portrayal of Sofia is Marina de Tavira, who provides a nice parallel for the film but is given even less to do on screen than Aparicio. Once again this doesn’t mean that she does a bad job in the film. Rather it just doesn’t seem like the caliber of performance that an Oscar winner would give.

The Verdict

          Roma is certainly different when compared to the other best picture nominations. This doesn't mean that the film succeeds in every regard. Its interesting perspective and expert direction make the film an Oscar nominee. Its slow story and un-compelling characters make this a hard film to recommend to a typical filmgoer. The experience of watching the film at home rather than in the theater simply isn't ideal. This film won’t appeal to everyone, which is why I feel it is tricky for Netflix to launch into their vision of the future of entertainment. It is a hard recommendation but at the same time will be loved by many, which is completely contradictory but true.

[cinesaver]

Creative Perspectives Can Make All The Difference: Vice Movie Review

          How does an actor get nominated for an Oscar? Is it his or her emotional depth? Or perhaps their demanding presences on screen? A recent trend within the past two years is a physical transformation that makes the A-list actor almost unrecognizable as the portray a real-life character. Last year's winner, Gary Oldman for The Darkest Hour, perfected this technique. Now Christian Bale hopes to do the same for his latest film. Will Bale’s dedication to the role be enough for Vice to win big, or will the film leave the Oscars empty-handed?

The Plot

          Vice tells the life story of Dick Cheney. The film spans from his start in politics and moving all the way through the Bush presidency. Along the way it tackles the real events he dealt with and shows how he made his mark on history. 

          The first real star of the film is its director and writer Adam Mckay. The feat he accomplishes with Vice is the same he did in The Big Short. He successfully explains complex and intricate concepts and situations in unique and clever ways. This makes somewhat mundane topics fun and interesting to an audience.

          Vice stands out from other movies due to its unique perspective and story structure. The film is giving an insanely interesting viewpoint due to its narrator. This allows a new and third-person perspective to a story about Dick Cheney, rather than having Dick tell the story himself. The complexities that come from this give the film the added punch it needed separating itself from other Oscar films of the past that depict true stories, much like The Post which was nominated last year.  

          Vice is a surprisingly self-aware film, which is surprising when you think that it's depicting a true story. What I mean by this is that it breaks the fourth wall for the sake of comedy multiple times throughout the film. Usually doing this to successfully prove a point or simply explain boring legal jargon in a light-hearted manner.  

The Cast and Characters

          Just about everybody was talking about Christian Bale’s performance ever since the trailer for this film dropped before Christmas. His transformation is so drastic that talks of Oscar nominations appeared even before the film was released. Bale's physical performance is uncanny from his look to his mannerisms. That being said this isn't my favorite performance of the year, though I think it's likely he will receive the Oscar. I say this mostly because there isn't a scene in the film that lets bale have his Oscar-worthy moment. The true moment for Bale is his dedication to his craft by showing the lengths he will go for a role.

          Amy Adams one again makes the cast list for another best picture nomination in the role of Lynne Cheney. Adams provides charisma and soul that plays off Dick’s cold demeanor very well. That being said this isn’t a role that will be taking home any Oscars but her presence on screen is undeniable.

          Lastly, Sam Rockwell plays a role that he seemed to be born to play. George W. Bush. Rockwell doesn't play the character as you see in old SNL skits, which has become the stereotype. Rather we see a character that is simply taken advantage of by politicians working below him. Yes, the film does have fun at his expense, but this film isn't just about bashing his presidency. It's about showing his role in Dick Cheney’s life.

The Verdict

          Vice will surely be remembered for its dramatic transformations of A-list actors to these real-life characters, but I would argue that the real award-winning performance here is from writer and director Adam Mckay. Simply put, a film about Dick Cheney shouldn’t be as creative, fun, and interesting as this one is. His unique story structure and script allow for this film to really stand out. This is why I recommend you see this film at full price.

[cinesaver]

The Anime Conundrum: Alita Battle Angel Movie Review

               Live action adaptations of anime and manga face a double bladed sword from the moment they begin development. Do they accept their stylistic roots, or do they conform to a more western style? Both of which has its pros and cons. You lose the dedicated fans if you stray too far from the source material, but you might also lose a new audience if you delve too much into the lore and style. What is a filmmaker to do? Can this stylized entertainment medium transfer to the screen and be a success at the box office? James Cameron and Robert Rodriguez hope to create the first adaptation that satisfies fans of the source material while also creating new fans. Does Alita Battle Angel succeed in its endeavor, or does it further prove the point that this style just doesn’t transfer well?

The Plot and Design

               Alita Battle Angel tells the story of a mechanic who finds the broken parts of an old cyborg left rotting in a garbage dump. This cyborg, also known as Alita, has trouble remembering her life before she was awoken. As organized crime begins to take over their city, it is up to Alita to solve the mystery of her past to better understand the future of all mankind.

             Alita Battle Angel delves deep into its anime and manga roots, which makes this a very stylized adaptation. That being said the design and creation of the world is the films strongest suit. The world in which Alita lives in is a beautiful post-apocalyptic wasteland that you will never grow tired of looking at. That being said, there are moments in the film in which the characters or so stylized in their design that it looks a little wonky on screen.  

           Where the film needed more help is in its story. The first major gripe of the film is that, at times, it is more interested in setting up sequels that it fails to finish the story presented. I understand that the filmmakers want to play some of their cards close in order to have shocking reveals in its sequels, but the movie refuses to explain almost everything in order to get you to come out again. Alita Battle Angel is a gamble to begin with, which makes me worry if a sequel will ever come to fruition. This makes Alita’s first outing seem somewhat incomplete on its own.

               The script also tends to have some pacing and dialogue issues. There are long portions of the film that aimlessly wander around until it meets a revelation, which makes the film dull at times. That on top of clunky writing makes for a script that needed to be fine-tuned.  

The Cast and Characters

               The title role of Alita is played by Rosa Salazar, who relies heavily on motion capture technology to give the character her exaggerated features. This can make the character look somewhat alienating when compared to the other characters, but Salazar truly sells this performance by creating a powerful character that still obtains just enough innocence. Many were skeptical when trailers first showed her design, but rest assured the performance is well done and her exaggerated design makes sense in the context of the film. Not to mention you almost forget you're looking at a CGI character as the film progresses.  

               Many of the actors in the film provide a boost to a somewhat lackluster script. The same cannot be said about Keean Johnson, who plays the love interest named Hugo. This storyline simply doesn’t work from the beginning. It is here that the flaws in writing and acting are truly seen. I simply never felt a real connection between Hugo and Alita which made the conclusion of the film all the less impactful.

               The supporting performances coming from A-List actors made me hopeful for this film. This includes the likes of Christoph Waltz, Jennifer Connelly, and Mahershala Ali. Waltz does a good job grounding the film and always shines on screen, but Connelly and Ali are simply underused. Their characters are interesting and I wish the film would explore them more, but they simply aren’t given enough to do.

The Verdict

               Live action anime and manga adaptations seem to be a tough sell at the box office, which isn't helped by their less than reputable track record. Alita Battle Angel doesn't really break that stereotype but does push this genre forward just a bit. It is as if this film is simply another step in the right direction, but simply could reach its aspirations. This is a beautiful film to look at complete with mind-blowing action sequences but fails due to its unsatisfying plot, clunky writing, and some one-dimensional characters. That being said there is enough here to keep you entertained and that's why I would recommend you see this film at a discounted price on Tuesdays.

[cinesaver]

Breaking The Mold: Spider-Man Into The Spider-Verse Movie Review

              No franchise is more familiar with reboots, remakes, and sequels than that of Spider-Man which has six films and three reboots since the year 2002. The franchise has seemed a bit tapped out with a constant stream of stories being told around the same character, and yet audiences can't get enough of their favorite web-head. Sony, who still shares the rights to the character with Marvel Studios, hopes to revitalize the franchise with a different take on the character. Will Into the Spider-Verse resonate with audiences or will it be just another entry on the long list of superhero sequels?

The Plot and Design

               Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse takes place in a new dimension in which Peter Parker exists and is Spider-Man, but the difference is he is not the only one. The film focuses on a new Spider-Man whose alter ego is Miles Morales. Miles is forced to learn how to use his new abilities and save the world as his dimension collides with another.

               It will be hard for audiences not to compare this film to others in the franchise. I even found myself asking the same question. How does it hold up to films I have loved for most of my life? The answer is this is the best Spider-Man movie since 2004’s Spider-Man 2.

             The story here may be a little predictable, but at the same time, it manages to tell an origin story without being bogged down in the same origin we have seen countless times. The choice to introduce alternate Spider-heroes gives this film a breath of fresh air.

           This film constantly surprised me. By this, I don't mean it’s shocking with its plot twists. Rather it surprised me with its willingness to be daring. The film chooses an interesting story that is willing to take chances, a quality that seems to be lacking in the franchises more recent endeavors. I won't go into detail about what the risks are, but rest assured it pays off big time.

          This is the first film in the franchise that is animated, which might be a turn off to many mature audience members. This thought process would do the film an injustice because the animation and design presented in the film are unique and incredibly engrossing. The animation style resembles that of a comic book which creates a unique look and sets it apart from any other animated film.

The Cast and Characters

               Into The Spider-Verse excels in regards to its characters. The film has a stacked cast which features the likes of Mahershala Ali, John Mulaney, Jake Johnson, Hailee Steinfeld, Chris Pine, and even Nick Cage. Starring in the lead role is Shameik Moore as Miles. His style, origin, and overall demeanor is a refreshing take on the character. Moore gives a performance that is charismatic, humorous, and believable. Simply put, Miles personality gives the film its identity and style.  

               The irony about the film is that Jake Johnson, who plays the role of Peter Parker, steals the show. I say that because the whole selling point of the film is that it provides a look at all new Spider-heroes, and yet its original character is still the most engrossing. It is in this film we see a Peter Parker that is older, more damaged, and more conflicted than he has seemed in years. Jake Johnson, of New Girl fame, gives the role the perfect amount of humor and sincerity that is to be expected in the role.

              The only minor complaint about the film is that the other Spider-Hero characters are so interesting in their origins, design, and presence that you wish they could be on the screen more than they actually are. Most notably being the fan favorite character called Spider-Gwen, which is played by Hailee Steinfeld. This character provides a much needed female presence that is so strong it makes you ask when she will be given her own film. The others presented are a tad more gimmicky, but the film realizes this and uses each sparingly.

The Verdict  

               Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse proves that creative angles, willingness to takes chances, and a great cast can bring life back to an overused franchise. The film's style and animation will leave you breathless. Its story will push you to see what a comic book film can really be. And simply put this film will win the Oscar for the best animated film. That is why I strongly encourage you to see this film at full price.  

[cinesaver]

No Longer the Butt of the Joke: Aquaman Movie Review

             Aquaman has always been the butt of many jokes thrown around the local comic shop because his somewhat comical skill set and costume design have never allowed him to rise above the status of a B list character. Now that we live in a comic book film renaissance, it is time to dust off that trident and really give Aquaman the film treatment he deserves.  Does the new Aquaman film have what it takes to change the public's opinion, or should he just return to the depths from which he came?

The Plot

               Aquaman tells the origin story for Arthur Curry, the son of a lighthouse operator and the Queen of Atlantis, who tries to avoid his duty on the throne of Atlantis. It is up to Arthur to intervene when a corrupt family member not only takes the throne but threatens to wage war with the humans who live on land.

               The first thing that needs to be said about this film is that it fully realizes how ridiculous and comic booky its source material is. The film really plays into the cheesy action movie vibe that is all too familiar with any classic 80's flick. This self-aware quality gives the movie personality and simply makes it more light-hearted than the other films before it.  

             That being considered there are parts of this film that look so out of this world that it can be somewhat jarring to watch on screen. There are multiple scenes in which the characters ride giant seahorses, talk to giant sea monsters, or just float in water that can give you a laugh. That being said it creates a fun yet ridiculous time at the movies.  

             The plot for Aquaman does a pretty impressive juggling act as it attempts to keep all of its storylines together. At times it may seem as if the movie is trying to do too much in its attempt to flash back to its origin story while also bringing you up to speed with what's happening in the present. Rest assured audiences won't ever be lost throughout the film, but it should be noted that it can be somewhat all over the place.  

               The director, James Wan, creates some of the most elaborate and fun action sequences of the year in this film. The action scenes seem as if they are taken in as few cuts as possible. The camera will follow characters through demolished buildings, underwater civilizations, and exotic locals in a way that shows off the films impressive choreography.

               Many were skeptical about the films ability to pull off long sequences that take place underwater. I can say without a doubt that the visual effects in the film are some of the best of the year. The city of Atlantis uses just about every color on the pallet while giving it a distinct look that hasn’t been seen on screen.

The Cast and Characters

               The true selling point for this film is its cast. Jason Momoa, from Game of Thrones fame, lends the film an insane amount of personality and charisma to really sell this character. Momoa finds a nice balance between humor and seriousness that really drives the film. His physical appearance and mastery of the choreography simply add to the character and his on-screen presence. This is a take on the character that most audiences have never seen before and will be sure to love.  

               Another notable performance is by Amber Heard, who plays Aquaman’s love interest named Mera. Much like Momoa, Heard gives this role an incredible amount of personality and charisma which makes it hard not to love her on screen. It is also nice to see a love interest in a superhero film that is as strong, if not stronger, than the hero.

The Verdict

               Aquaman has come a long way from his comic book roots. His latest film outing reimagines the character in a way that is both fun and likable. Jason Momoa and Amber Heard provide the film with much-needed personality, while its director creates an interesting world for them to inhabit. That being said the plot of the film does have some moments that can be laughable and it does juggle too much at times. This is a step in the right direction for the DC cinematic universe but just falls short of being as impressive as Man of Steel and Wonder Woman. It’s characters and their world still make this a film to see on the big screen but perhaps on a discount day at the theater.  

[cinesaver]

The Oscar Worthy Moment: The Green Book Movie Review

              Mahershala Ali and Viggo Mortensen are no strangers to the Academy Awards, with both acting in a Best Picture winner along with multiple nominated pictures in the past. This is why it is no surprise that the academy nominated their latest film, The Green Book, for the best picture of the year. Do these Oscar veterans have what it takes to win the hearts of the academy, or was this film simply just Oscar bait?

The Plot

               The Green Book takes place in the 1960s and tells the true story of a wisecracking bouncer from New York City named Tony Lip, who has fallen on hard times and is in desperate need of money. Tony's bodyguard experience makes him the ideal candidate to escort Dr. Don Shirley, an African American pianist, through the deep South for a concert tour that would last months.  

               The first thing that needs to be discussed in this film is that the writing and more specifically its humor is very strong. That is a comment that doesn’t often get said in regards to best picture nominations. That being said The Green Book provides consistent laughs that derive from its wit and never once falls back on cheap jokes, which makes this movie memorable.  

              The film decides to take a more subtle approach to racism in America. This may sound like it would diminish the point and moral of the film, when in reality it is this approach to the issue that makes the movie resonate.  It allows you to really gauge what life was like in this time period by showing the simple rights and luxuries that were denied to people of color at that time.

              I always say that every Oscar-worthy film has one moment that really cements it in the category. One scene that is so well done that it makes you sit back in your seat and say this is why it is up for an Oscar. The Green Book accomplishes this multiple times but there is one scene, in particular, I refer to which I won't spoil for those who haven't seen it. Trust me you will know when you see it.

The Cast

               This film works as good as it does mostly because of its cast. Leading the film is Viggo Mortensen as Tony Lip. Mortensen shows his strength with each role by making it different than the last. This role proves that Viggo is about as dynamic as they come in Hollywood because it not only shows growth throughout the film dramatically but also a comedic timing that is second to none. A sentiment the Academy agrees with because he was nominated for best actor.

               Nominated for best supporting actor is Mahershala Ali for his portrayal of Dr. Don Shirley. A nomination that does seem odd due to the fact that he is practically a lead. Once again, Ali provides a performance that is so suave, stylish, and likable that he simply can’t be ignored on screen. His chemistry with Mortensen is what sells the film, and might be the best combination of two actors this year. The interesting part of his role is that over the course of the film, we see his progression of the character just as much as Mortensen. This allows the audience to really fall for him as a character while relating to his struggle.

The Verdict        

             The Green book succeeds in telling the true story that most audiences are unaware of. It provides a light-hearted look at the issue while never sacrificing its message. The script provides an insane amount of wit with more laughs than most comedies this year. On top of all of this is two of the best performances of the entire year. The Green Book is a phenomenal film that I am not hesitant to say is in the running for my favorite of the year, which makes this film a recommendation at full price.

[cinesaver]

A Giant Leap For Cinema: First Man Movie Review

             Director Damien Chazelle has been on a hit streak in regards to his career with his past two films, La La Land and Whiplash, being nominated for best picture of the year. Chazelle hopes to continue that streak with a bio pic telling the story of Neil Armstrong and the lunar missions. Will First Man take one large step for the cinema or one giant leap in the wrong direction?

The Plot

               First Man tells the story of Neil Armstrong as he first becomes affiliated with NASA and the space race. As political tensions grow, Armstrong finds it harder and harder to keep emotionally stable both at home and at work. It’s through these struggles we see one of the greatest accomplishments in the history of mankind.

               The first thing that needs to be stated about the film is that it is not entirely about the lunar missions, it’s about Neil Armstrong. Audiences might expect to see a film similar to Apollo 13 and The Right Stuff when in reality the film dives deeper into his family life. This doesn’t mean that the film doesn’t give ample details and time to the training and execution of the Apollo missions. It just doesn’t show each and every event that occurred.

               First Man takes many bold moves in regards to its storytelling and view point. This could easily have been a bigger blockbuster film revolving around the moon landing while instead it is a character driven story which allows it to have a much grander pay off.  That being said the slow pace and its attention to detail may turn audiences away from it’s almost two and a half hour run time.

               Damien Chazelle has shown a distinct look in each film he has previously made and First Man is no exception. The gritty look and feel of the film gives the audience an idea of just how new and dangerous these missions really were. Audiences will feel like they are witnessing real events due to the directorial choice to use a shaky camera both in the space shuttle and in scenes reminiscent of home movies. The film also boasts some of the best space scenes ever to be put on film. The sequences that take place on the moon are shot in IMAX film and are nothing short of breath taking. These scenes look so real that it makes you feel like Chazelle has been there himself.

               Unfortunately, First Man has been plagued by bad press due to the fact that no astronaut is seen placing the American flag in the ground. I just want to touch quickly and say that the flag is present during the scenes and the film doesn’t short change the patriotism involved in the space race. The scene they decided to show instead is the emotional punch this movie truly needed, deserves, and simply makes sense in regards to the story that is trying to tell.

The Cast

               This movie is truly about Neil Armstrong, though it would have been nice to delve deeper into the other astronauts involved. That being said Ryan Gosling provides yet another impressive performance. Gosling gives a performance that is intentionally withheld in order to show how truly distant Neil was emotionally. His performance is reminiscent of last year’s Blade Runner 2049 in this regard. Gosling proves that sometimes doing less is more.

               Playing opposite of Gosling is Claire Foy in the role of Janet Armstrong. The struggle of the astronaut’s wife gives a nice dynamic and break from the detail orientated space sequences. This troubled character gives some of the most compelling scenes in the film. Her call for her husband’s presence in her life and her nonchalant responses to this other worldly endeavor creates a truly captivating dynamic.

The Verdict

               Chazelle once again provides a film that will surely be talked about during award season. Though it may not be as strong as his previous two films, First Man does provide a compelling story and simply one of the best looking and intense space films to date. The disorienting flight and space sequences create a thrill that must be seen on the big screen. Just like Chazelle’s previous films the last act of the story is simply perfection. This film is a must see at full price on the biggest screen possible so that you can truly experience the lunar landing.

[cinesaver]

Classics Never Die: A Star is Born Movie Review

              Fans of classic films constantly tell themselves that Hollywood is smart enough to not ruin a good thing. That their favorite movies are perfect on their own and simply touching it would tarnish the stories that they hold near and dear to their hearts, but sometimes there comes a story that is so timeless that updating it every couple of decades simply makes sense. A Star is Born is the directorial debut for Bradley Cooper and he hopes to bring new life to an old story. Does A Star is Born have what it takes to differentiate itself from the other films of the same name, or will it simply fall suit with many other reboots?  

The Plot

               The story of A Star is Born centers around a Southern rock artist named Jackson Maine who meets and eventually falls for an up and coming artist named Ally. Their relationship and careers become intertwined as they learn the struggle of keeping a strong home life while also pursuing a music career.

               This is the fourth time A Star is Born has been made with its original counterpart releasing in the year 1937. This makes it hard to keep the movie fresh because the story has been told multiple times. That being said the latest iteration of this classic love story succeeds in just about every category. The first being in the writing and updating of the story. The direction and viewpoint this film takes makes it extremely relevant for a modern audience, and truly shows a sign of the times.

               One of the true selling points of the film is its soundtrack which needs to be remembered because it is almost entirely written and sung by both Lady GaGa and Bradley Cooper, both of which do an exceptional job. It’s hard to believe that Cooper can really hold his own in regards to his singing ability. The story provides meaning to each and every song, which makes the music more impactful. It’s also interesting to see the progression of the two artists and how their music changes over the years.

The Cast

               The previous films boast huge names like Barbra Streisand, Judy Garland, and Kris Kristofferson which makes it crucial that the casting is just right in the two lead roles. Cooper not only directs but stars in one of the lead roles and once again fully immerses himself. His accent in the film is so drastic from his actual voice that it’s hard to believe it’s really him. He exudes character in his presence and mannerisms as he gives a performance that will undoubtedly be talked about come Oscar season.

               Lady Gaga proves that her talent spans different entertainment mediums as she gives a performance that is so raw that you would think she has been acting for years. Her musical background gives her believability in the role and simply makes her the perfect choice. Gaga really shows a progression, both musically and from a character viewpoint, that makes the character very engaging.

The Verdict

              The latest retelling of A Star is Born proves that updating a classic film can be done successfully if enough care is put into it. Cooper shows that he is a jack of all trades as he directs, sings, and acts at a high level. While Lady Gaga simply reinforces the fact that she is one of the best music artist around while also revealing her exceptional acting ability. Both of these actors step out of their comfort zone to meet the level of talent of each other. Cooper has created something truly special that will surely be nominated for an Oscar. If you didn’t already guess you should see this film at full price.

[cinesaver]

Still Got it After All Of These Years: Mission Impossible Fallout Movie Review

               It’s pretty common to see action stars get  traded in for new and young replacements in their old age. This concept is apparently foreign to film star Tom Cruise, who continues to pump out thrilling movies each and every year. Mission Impossible has become famous for Tom’s death defying stunts, which even left him with a broken foot during the filming of his latest entry to the franchise. Will Mission Impossible: Fallout prove that Cruise can still hang around in the action adventure genre, or should he look for more tame roles?

The Plot

               Mission Impossible: Fallout picks up after the events of Rogue Nation. Ethan Hunt pursues what is left of the terrorist group called the Syndicate, who are now strategically targeting locations for the greatest global effects. It’s up to hunt to intervene in a new plot, when the terrorist group finds the means to nuclear capabilities.

               A majority of the Mission Impossible franchise has consisted of  films with top notch action scenes, but their stories are often so convoluted that they are hard to follow leaving an audience to simply remember great scenes rather than the movie as a whole. The last film, Rogue Nation, diverted from this trend and Fallout does even more so. This is not only a great pure action film, but the best in the franchise by far.

               The story of the film is actually a strength unlike those that preceded it. The plot lays its self out in a way that is reminiscent of the new James Bond movies, and yet still feels very true to its source material. I was never confused or left with questions at any point throughout the film. It also delved deeper into the characters, which made it all the more compelling.

               Mission Impossible: Fallout boasts the most impressive action scenes I have seen all season. The difference between this film and others this summer is the sense of realism it provides during its white knuckled action scenes. Seeing Tom Cruise actually jump out of planes, hang from helicopters, and even break his foot while jumping out a building gives this film a novelty that most strive for. These real stunts give audiences a reason to choose this over other summer blockbusters.

The Cast and Characters

               Tom Cruise has played Ethan Hunt throughout the entire franchise. At times he is the only constant that returns for each sequel. Simply stated this is his franchise and the films strength is largely due to his dedication. Beyond the stunt work, Cruise gives a notable performance that stands out in the franchise. This is the first film to really dive into the psyche and back story of the Ethan, which makes the character the most compelling he has ever been.

               The new addition to the cast is the man of steel himself Henry Cavill. In my opinion this is a crucial role for Cavill and one that he plays perfectly. The reason this role is so important is because it is unlike the other roles he has been in. Often times Cavill dons the role of the handsome hero. Mission Impossible forces him to be darker, grittier, and all out drastically different from what he is used to. This is a welcome change and one that shows his range.

               One of the strongest factors of this film is the team that surrounds Cruise. Ving Rhames and Simon Pegg reprise their roles and simply add to the films charm. The dynamic that is formed between the team gives the movie some comedic relief along with heart. These characters are also more fully realized in the film, by having a story that pushes them to the limits both physically and emotionally.

The Verdict

               Tom Cruise proves that he doesn’t have to stop making exciting films because Mission Impossible: Fallout is one of the most impressive action films in some time. The story delivers more of a punch than its predecessors. It pushes all of its characters physically and emotionally. The action scenes are given a sense of realism since the stunts are performed by both Cruise and stunt men rather than having CGI. All of this adds up to a perfect summer movie and one that I would recommend you see at full price.

[cinesaver]

Staying True to the Material: Ocean’s 8 Movie Review

             It’s been a while since we have last caught up with Danny Ocean and his elaborate heists, with the last Ocean’s film hitting theaters back in 2007. These star studded casts and well thought out schemes have always been a big hit at the box office. Studios hope to revitalize the franchise by casting an all women cast this time around, a tactic that doomed Ghostbusters only a few years back. Will Ocean’s 8 resonate with audiences or will it isolate longtime fans?

The Plot

               Ocean’s 8 tells the story of Danny Ocean’s sister named Debbie, who has spent the last five years in prison. While there she concocts an elaborate plan to get rich quick by stealing priceless jewels from the Met Gala. This of course leads her to search for a group and execute the elaborate heist one step at a time.

               The first thing that Ocean’s 8 gets right is the feel of the rest of the franchise. This is the only time I will compare it to the latest Ghostbusters film, which is odd to say because these films are pretty unrelated. Though Ocean’s 8 cast an entirely new list of  characters, it never forgets what it is. And that is an Ocean’s film. The writing, characters, and even the story feels like it should.

               The film is a direct sequel to the others which in some respects works because it doesn’t disregard what came before it. The problem is that you don’t really see any of these past characters make an appearance. The film also totally dedicates itself to the fate of George Clooney’s Character, Danny Ocean, which might rub some fans the wrong way.

               The heist itself is new and refreshing for not only the franchise, but also the genre. It provides an interesting backdrop for the story, while also adding an undeniable style that is always interesting to look at. The heist is extremely well thought out, with every piece falling into place. This keeps the audience guessing when all of the evidence is expertly placed before them. That being said every Ocean’s movie has a moment where it reveals the big twist in the heist that brings the whole thing together. This film does that as well but the twist can seem a little underwhelming by comparison to the rest of the film.

               The other weak aspect of the film is that not every character is given as much screen time in the film. All of the women in this movie have interesting characters, and are uniquely distinct. That being said with such a large cast it can be difficult to juggle each any every character. It just would have been nice to see more of some of these new characters.

The Cast and Characters

               Leading the film is Sandra Bullock in the title character. Bullock’s style and presence can be felt throughout the film and does a good job as its lead. It should be commended that Bullock makes this character feel like more than just a female version of Danny. This allows the movie to be a sequel and yet seem new.

               One of the highlights of the film is Lou played by Cate Blanchett. Her rough exterior provides a nice dynamic with Bullock. Blanchett is given more screen time than most other women on the team, which allows her character time to grow.

               The last acting highlight is the fashion designer named Rose played by Helena Bonham Carter. This character stands out from the bunch due to Carters eccentric nature and her extravagant look. Carter also provides some comic relief throughout the film, which she pulls off expertly. This is a character Carter could play in her sleep, and one we have seen multiple times. That being said her character never grows stale and is always refreshing on screen.

The Verdict

               Ocean’s 8 gives a new spin on the fan favorite franchise and proves that new characters can be casted while still capturing what made these stories fun. Each and every women provides something interesting and different and for the most part gives a good performance. Rihanna’s performance leaves little to be desired, but her role doesn’t take away from the film. This film makes bold choices most of which pay off. There are a couple of underwhelming aspects including the films twist and how it handled the fate of George Clooney’s character, but this is a fun film that I recommend you see at a discount price on Tuesday.

[cinesaver]

More of the Same: Deadpool 2 Movie Review

              Fan favorite character, Deadpool, turned the superhero genre on its head back in 2016 with his vulgar humor and graphic violence. Big budget studios were hesitant to create an R rated superhero film up until this point. Deadpool proved that not only was there an audience for this kind of film, but it was exactly what fans have been asking for. Will Deadpool 2 continue to push the genre or will this sequel give us more of the same?

The Plot  

               Deadpool 2 finds our title character stuck in the middle of a time travel plot as the mysterious Cable travels from the future to kill a new mutant for reasons unknown. Deadpool vows to protect this young mutant in an attempt to become a better man and hero.

               The plot of Deadpool 2 is a bit strange in respect to the struggle that it provides for the title character. This is a film with dark humor and themes that seem out of place at times. Seeing a superhero attempting to kill themselves for various reasons throughout the film does leave the audience kind of conflicted. This also leads to strange scenes of Deadpool experiencing the afterlife. It is here that the film wants you to truly care for its characters, but this isn’t accomplished because its characters have never been seen as anything more than funny.

               Deadpool has always been kind of an enigma to me because his character isn’t inherently interesting. As far as comic book characters go he is pretty standard. His super powers aren’t anything we haven’t seen before, and even his appearance looks similar to a handful of characters. This is fixed by simply adding humor to allow the audience to connect with him. This could be forgiven if the humor was a little more clever rather than relying on cock and butt jokes. That being said this film does provide some laugh out loud moments when it truly tries to set up funny scenes, but beyond that it simply provides the same jokes we have seen in the first film.

               One of the highlights of the first film was its fast and over the top action. Deadpool 2 is no exception. There are multiple standouts including a prison break out, elaborate car chase, and some super hero smack downs.

The Cast and Characters

               It doesn’t matter if you like the character of not, Ryan Reynolds is the perfect actor for the role. His charisma, comedic timing, and his dedication to the role really sell this character. He is simply the reason Deadpool works as well as it does. It never gets old to see the actor poke fun at his past super hero roles such as Green Lantern or another iteration of Deadpool. If you want to see the merc with a mouth on screen, it simply won’t get any better than with Ryan Reynolds.

               Loyal comic fans know that Deadpool is often teamed up with the time traveling cyborg named Cable. The character is introduced in this sequel and is played by Josh Brolin. Brolin seems like he kind of phones it in for the part by playing it exactly how you would expect. His presence is always welcomed on screen, but at the same time you will never be missing him if he isn’t there. His back story can seem somewhat convoluted along with a superpower that isn’t really defined. It just would have been beneficial to know more about the character. The movie doesn’t even address the fact that he is a cyborg. Seems like something that an audience would like to know.

               Stealing every scene she is in is Zazie Beetz in the role of Domino. This hero provides what the movie definitely needs and that’s originality. Domino’s super power isn’t that she can fly or has super strength. Rather she is just super lucky. On paper this doesn’t seem like anything that would be fun to watch, but the film finds interesting ways to present this to an audience. This is something we haven’t seen before, and will be exciting to see more of in the future.

The Verdict

               Deadpool 2 provides fans what they wanted, but doesn’t really push the envelope in regards to its characters or story. This is a pretty forgettable superhero film that gives some big action, humor, and countless references. The movie is in no way bad but Deadpool 2 gets lost in a world that is flooded with movies in the genre. The acting from Ryan Reynolds sells the film and its title character, but Brolin seems to be pretty uninspired in the role of Cable. If you enjoyed the first film then this sequel will be up your ally, that’s why I recommend you see Deadpool 2 at a discounted price on Tuesday.

[cinesaver]

What Did I Just Watch?: Sorry to Bother You Movie Review

              Last year Jordan Peele’s breakout hit, Get Out, reached critical praise to the point that it actually was nominated for an Oscar. The beauty of the film is that it uses horror and science fiction elements to exaggerate common issues in our society today. First time director, Boots Riley, hopes to catch that same lightning in the bottle with his film Sorry to Bother You. Will the film expertly weave horror elements with the issues that plague us today, or should audiences turn to other movies that have succeed in this attempt?

The Plot

               Trying to describe the plot of this film without spoiling any of its twists in turns is next to impossible. I will give you a short basic idea. The film tells the story of a telemarketer named Cassius Green, who discovers he can sell more of his product over the phone if he uses a voice that sounds like a white man. This strategy works so well that he becomes promoted, but then learns what his company is actually selling.

               Sorry to Bother You is without a doubt the strangest movie I have seen in sometime. I, along with fellow audience members, didn’t know what to make of it as I exited the theater. The movie frequently pushes the envelope with its plot, which is something the director could be commended for because the film is definitely unlike anything I have ever seen. That being said, just because it is different does not mean it’s good.

               The film does reach moments that are very shocking, and honestly you wouldn’t even believe that these scenes made it into the film if I were to touch on it. These outrageous scenes make the rest of the film seem very mundane. It’s as if there are two drastically different stories being told here. Since the first half is so drastically different, it makes the second hour seem even more jarring. I will say this film can be very disturbing. Honestly, I would avoid it if your get queasy or uneasy in horror films.

               The biggest redeeming qualities of the film are its cast and the way its shot. Sorry to Bother You does give some interesting scene set up. For example rather than watching Cassius on the phone for long periods of time, we see that his desk is literally dropped into the room he is calling. This makes for not only an interesting scene, but one that can have some good comedic timing.  

               Sorry to Bother You attempts to make a point with this outrageous story. I think the biggest issue with the movie is that it doesn’t choose one point to make. Rather it does a shot gun approach and tries to give commentary on so much that it’s almost overwhelming. It’s as if that the writers and director had too many ideas and not all of them fit in the film. This is an artsy movie that will alienate audiences by beating them over the head with statements on race, the workforce, politics, business, and how all of that affects our road to success.

               This is a dark and somewhat shocking comedy. The humor of the film tries to draw from just how absurd the story and twists really are. That being said it is taken with such a serious tone at times that it doesn’t come off as humorous, which then leaves the audience with a strange mix of emotions.

The Cast and Characters

               Sorry to Bother You does boast a pretty stacked cast for a limited release film. Lakeith Stanfield, known for his role in Get Out, plays Cassius. Stanfield does a good job keeping this strange tale together while providing a conflicted character. We do get to see how success changes someone, and Stanfield does show growth as the story unfolds. It is also impressive to see how Stanfield reacts and lip-syncs to the words in his white voice because those lines are given by actor David Cross.

               Oscar nominated actor Arnie Hammer once again brings audiences a movie that goes against the norm for actors like him. His charisma on screen has always subjected him to being a leading man or hero, but as of recent he has stared in art house films such as this or Call Me By Your Name. Hammer does provide an equally shocking performance in this film, which does give it more credibility but at the same time will leave audiences thinking why he accepted the role in the first place.

The Verdict

               Sorry to Bother You is a shocking, artsy, dark comedy that will surely divide audiences. The film uses science fiction and horror to provide commentary on issues today, but does so in such a jarring way that it ruins the interesting set up. This movie left me feeling disgusting just for watching it, and honestly is a pretty tough sell for a standard audience. The way it is advertised is very different from the final product. The film has too many concepts and points to make that it feels like the filmmakers are just throwing things at you to see what sticks. It tries to reach the same heights as Get Out but lacks the focus, storytelling ability, and simply as interesting a concept. This will be an unpopular opinion with many, but I feel that audiences should save their money avoid the film.

[cinesaver]

A Galaxy Filled with Scoundrels: Solo: A Star Wars Story Movie Review

            Disney bought Lucasfilm Studios back in the year 2012, and since has created four different Star Wars films reaching successes from critics and audiences alike. Their plan is to not only make a new trilogy that takes place after its predecessors, but also to release anthology films that tell stories set throughout the Star Wars universe. Its latest entry into the franchise, Solo: A Star Wars Story has been plagued with issues behind the camera. This has led to directorial changes and the hiring of acting coaches to salvage this sinking ship. This news has obviously made its fan base skeptical. Will these notoriously critical fans accept the latest entry or will their greatest fears be seen on the big screen?

The Plot

               Solo: A Star Wars Story takes place between episodes three and four. This origin story shows a young Han Solo trying to make his way in the galaxy by any means necessary. It is here that Han learns of a job with a payoff so big that he could quit this lifestyle before he is really dedicated to it.

               Solo: A Star Wars Story is a different type of Star Wars film due to its tone and plot. The film isn’t as heavy as the rest of the franchise. What it does lack in depth though it gains back in thrills. This film feels like a summer blockbuster that is simply fun. It’s not the best Star Wars movie ever made, but it isn’t trying to be. It proves that there can be different types of Star Wars movies and stories, which is a good thing considering the amount of films Disney is pushing out.

               The issue on everyone’s mind is the directorial change from Phil Lord and Christopher Miller to Ron Howard due to creative differences. The film doesn’t seem to suffer for this change because the tone and direction seems to be pretty consistent throughout.

               The main issue with the anthology films is that they can be predictable. Those who know the franchise well could tell you what this movie is about and where it will lead to. This was a factor that plagued the last anthology film Rogue One. That being said Solo does provide a couple of plot twists that will surprise and shock fans, which is an impressive feat for a movie like this.

               Solo: A Star Wars Story does rely on the other films pretty heavily, but at the same time it seems that this story could be watched by audiences who have never seen a Star Wars film. That being said a lot of the fun of this film is seeing how everything plays out, and how characters initially meet.

               What Solo gives audiences that the other films may lack is some incredibly interesting world building scenes. This film shows us what it feels like to live under the reign of the Empire and what that would look like in regard to its slums, war, and even propaganda.

The Characters and Cast

               Star Wars has always had good characters, and Solo is no different when it comes to this regard. The cast is perfect in their roles, which is impressive because they were made famous by other actors.

               Playing the lead role of Han Solo is Alden Ehrenreich, who has stared in films like Hail, Caesar! and Beautiful Creatures. Ehrenreich plays the part with just enough familiarity that it seems like the Han we know and love but at the same time makes the part his own. This allows us to see where Han has come from and what he was like at this point in his life. The film gets the character of Han right by showing that he is a scoundrel, but at the same time he is caring and compassionate.

               The film does a great job introducing and planting the seeds for relationships that last throughout the entire franchise. This is especially true for Han and Chewbacca, which is probably the strongest character dynamic in the film.

               Donald Glover keeps up his hot streak by playing the role of Lando Calrissian, which was made famous by Billy Dee Williams. Glover simply steals almost every scene he is in with a character that is spot on to the original. His suave and smooth character provides an interesting dynamic with Han and the rest of the crew, which makes for some interesting scenes and exchanges.  

               The weakest point of the movie is its villain, Dryden Vos, played by Paul Bettany. The role is acted well and it seems like something interesting could have been done with the character, but the film never allows him enough screen time to be something truly special.  

               Woody Harrelson gets his Star Wars debut with the character named Beckett. Harrelson gives another notable performance with a role that he could play in his sleep. This type of part is his bread and butter. He feels very at home in the story and the universe.

The Verdict

               Solo: A Star Wars Story gives audiences the origins of their favorite smuggler. The film changes the pace of the franchise by creating a story that doesn’t seem as heavy as the others in the series. It simply is a fun summer movie filled with great action set pieces. The cast of the film does a good job recreating these characters without seeming like cheap imitations. The film could have used a little more help in regards to its villain, but most Star Wars fans will be pleased to finally see famous scenes that are only mentioned in the other films. The issues behind the camera, that has plagued this movie, can’t be seen on screen. This is why Solo: A Star Wars Story is an enjoyable film at full price.

[cinesaver]

A Decade Long Investment Leads to Big Pay Off: Avengers: Infinity War Review

              Audiences had no idea what was on the horizon back in 2008 with the release of Iron Man. For years this film will be remembered as the starting point of the renaissance era for superhero films. Since then we have seen 18 other Marvel movies, which introduced audiences to more characters than you can count. Each step of the way has hinted at a major crossover event. Avengers: Infinity War promises to do the impossible by juggling almost 20 heroes and a plot that can seem beyond daunting. Will Avengers: Infinity War live up to the hype or will it be lost in the rabble of films that came before it?

The Plot

              Avengers: Infinity War might be the most spoiler filled movie in years so I am going to promise to be as vague as possible. If you haven’t seen it, and don’t trust me enough, just come on back after you have seen it. We can take a rain check!

              Avengers: Infinity War takes place after the events of Thor: Ragnorakand Black Panther. The cosmic villain Thanos is searching for all six infinity stones, which will give him unlimited power. This forces the Avengers to team up with even more heroes for a truly epic cinematic event.

              Avengers: Infinity War is a spectacle in more ways than just its visuals. The most impressive part of this film is its ability to perform an insane juggling act. This movie could have been swallowed by the sheer amount of characters and plots it presents on screen. The directing team, the Russo brothers, need to be commended for their work on this film. This is an extremely well written film that gives each fan favorite character a moment to shine while still keeping its focus.

              The latest film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe is on a much larger scale. At times it doesn’t even feel like a superhero film. The action scenes play out much like war scenes that could be compared to something out of Star Wars. These scenes jump around from character to character giving fans of each their moment to cheer for their favorite.

              The strongest point of any Marvel film is its characters. Even when the films were weak the fact that fans were dedicated to these characters kept them invested. Avengers: Infinity War is no exception. Obviously the true highlight of the film is to see characters on screen interacting with each other. The film pairs up character in order to break up the large cast, but it does this very precisely. Each pair shows that the directors thought which combination would lead to an interesting dynamic. For example seeing characters like Iron Man interact with Doctor Strange provides an interesting duo.

              It should also be said that this entry in the franchise has found the sweet spot in regards to its humor. This has been an issue that has plagued films like Avengers: Age of Ultron and Thor: Ragnorak. That is to say that there are funny parts to the film, but the humor never takes away from the story. This can create a jarring look at the series as a whole though, because different directors provide different takes on these characters. If you are expecting to see frat boy Thor in this film then you will be disappointed.

The Cast and Characters  

              With so many characters in the film it is hard to pin point which is really the lead. The film really breaks it up into a three plots that revolve around Iron Man, Captain America, and Thor. That all being said, this is really a Thanos story. Marvel is notorious for bringing pretty lackluster villains to the big screen. That’s why it’s refreshing to say that Thanos is probably the best and most developed villain in the bunch. Josh Brolin provides the voice for this completely animated character. The film goes out of its way to explain his reasoning for his master plan, and even though it’s hard to relate to it does make the audience understand his point of view. Brolin does an expert job giving many well written monologues throughout the film, which create some of the most emotionally powerful moments in the series. He is the villain fans wanted for years, and the villain that Marvel has needed for a long time.

              The rest of the cast reprises their roles that are almost second nature to them at this point, but still provide great performances. Like I mentioned earlier the highlight of this film is watching the interactions between these characters. The chemistry between this ensemble cast is second to none.

             The only character that seemed jarring is one played by Peter Dinklage. For spoiler reasons I will refrain from saying who he played, but none the less his character is a little odd but Dinklage’s presences is still always welcomed on screen.

The Verdict

              Marvel made an investment ten years ago when it created its cinematic universe. Avengers: Infinity War is the film that has been anticipated by fans for years. It truly lives up to the unbelievable hype it has created over the years. This is a well written blockbuster film that expertly handles all of the characters and plots without getting overcome by it. Each fan favorite character is given enough time on screen to satisfy all types of audiences. The action is on a much larger scale than any other film in the franchise. Lastly this film brings some truly unexpected plot twists so avoid spoilers on social media at all cost. This is one of the strongest films in the universe and absolutely shouldn’t be missed. That is why I recommend you see it on the big screen at full price.