#<- violation of rules

[lockboy-and-hammerkid]

”Holy shit-“ “WHAT THE FUCK THAT WORKED?!”

Uhhh… I made a blog for the rats!

Refer to me as either Micheal, Jerry, or Keymod

Info/rules

Lock speech looks like: “Hello.”

Key speech looks like: “Hello.”

Lock: He/him, it/it’s (transmasc)

Key: They/them, it/its (agender)

they both have a lock and a key for a head, respectively.

Both Key and Lock are adorned with many, many scars, the prior having far more.

Key loves hammers, axes, Dhmis, and Jack Stauber

Lock loves music, moths, and cryptids.

Oh yeah! Adding a little onto them, mod’s adding some of his own (admittedly estranged) heritage into the two! Lock can speak very, very broken Vietnamese and slightly more fluid German, though not by much.

They are both around 15-17, and are minors, as is mod. Guilt gang (You know who you are) HARD DNI

Suggestive/flirty asks are allowed.

Key has like. Seven different parental figures.

Lock has one.

no heavily nsfw or violent asks.

Again, I am a minor, don’t be disgusting.

main acc is @crazed4rsonist

Basic Dni, but you transphobes and ableists.. you have a special place in hell in my mind!! Stay away!!

Their acquaintances/ family members:

Lock: Steven Stevenson (@/themostsanebug’s interpretation of him), and that’s it!

Key: Steven, (different interpretation of him,) Jake Wilson, (same mod), Eldi, (cryptid), William/Fly (themostsanebug), Bubble/droplet,(bubblesanddropletanon). T. There’s probably more tbh but uh.

[inkskinned]

we were sitting on the floor and i was cutting out tiny pictures to make a collage for a friend's birthday. you were on your phone and you laughed about something, and i was still in love with you then, so i asked what had you giggling.

"sorry. i was just..." you took a moment and went back to texting. "i was telling someone about how you're afraid of the dark."

i'm afraid of the dark because something bad happened. "oh." i felt a little slinky of shame crawl down my throat.

you glanced up, and maybe it showed on my face, because you rolled your eyes and held the phone to the side casually so i could see the group chat. "what? was it a secret?"

i looked down to the scissors in my hand. "i just..." no, it's not a secret. it just felt like something private, something serious. saying why would you tell someone that just feels like an accusation. it's unfair. i honestly am not even ashamed of it, it's just a fact about my person that i don't usually share.

what a strange experience. is this a human thing or a generational thing? for our grandparents: did they need to worry about how quickly someone can just... share your personal information? again, i didn't even really have a true objection. what could i say? i want any person in my life to feel they can be honest with their friends. it's not like i said don't tell anyone this.

i cut out another letter to complete the rainbow happy birthday, started hunting for the exclamation mark. i heard you sigh dramatically.

"don't make a big deal about this," you said.

this entire conversation was a pattern for us, and this was when we got to my least favorite part of the pattern. i would get my feelings hurt in some oblique not-technically-terrible way, and then it would be making a big deal about something. you'd get frustrated for me for being soft, but i was born soft. you knew i was soft when you pierced me. it's one of the things that made controlling me so easy.

"i'm not," i felt my voice crack. the question came without my wanting. "why are you guys talking about me?" and why are you saying that thing? why not like - i'm telling them how you're generous and kind and pretty.

you let out this low, tragic groan. "oh my god." you tossed the phone away from your body. "there, see? i just won't talk to them if you don't like it."

the rest of the hour went the way it always went, between us: i said i don't actually mind if you talk to your friends but -, you found a way to call my minor expression of discomfort "being dramatic." you got upset that i had been offended. i ended up apologizing, even though i hadn't actually done anything.

afterwards, you picked up the phone again. after texting for a little bit, you snorted. "okay," you said, "but it is kind of funny you're afraid of the dark. i mean, when you think about it."

[newttxt]

no matter what kind of pirate you are, luffy /will/ get you

[heynhay]

playing dirty

[visenyaism]

Do you think Ned ever felt the tiniest amount of guilt for the Theon hostage situation or did he think he was fully right?

I don’t think he thinks about it at all in the books. Ned believes his society is just and represses all evidence and emotional reactions that he has when asked to confront the reality that it’s not. Fostering children far away from their families, even as hostages, is an unfortunately normal part of the evil society he lives in. I don’t think it’s even on his radar

[kaiserouo]

weird i think my circuit board craves for blood

[ncux-vuptyo3]

they're SO COOL AND i LOVE THEM!!!! :_]

guys, we love nipple. isn't that beautiful

[baejax-the-great]

I actually need everyone to read Caroline Alexander's "The War that Killed Achilles" so they can see her argument for how the Iliad lays out the contrasts between Achilles and Agamemnon specifically as it comes to leadership in the war. Homer actually does include suggestions that Achilles wouldn't have mismanaged the war and would have evaded the personal conflicts that Agamemnon not only allows but instigates and then everyone can stop saying batshit things about how Achilles couldn't lead

[gauntletqueen]

isn't banning people based on "vibes" a conservative way of thinking? Idk I feel like forcibly removing people in your community who didn't do anything based on your idea on what's normal & fear that they COULD be dangerous is a justification for alot of right wing politicians & a basis behind xenaphobia.

Its literally a talking point of our oppressors.

First off there's something funny to me about seeing me retweet something on twitter and then going to my tumblr to respond to it anonymously

Second off, you're making big assumptions on what these vibes might be and what reasons streamers and other online creatives might have for removing people.

Here's some examples of people I've banned from my community discord server based on vibes:

Someone who only ever cared about talking to me, and never acknowledging anyone else in the server. They acted far too familiar with me despite me not knowing them, and continuously sent me DMs where they roleplayed things like hugging me. I explained why all of this behavior was not appreciated but they never listened. Classic parasocial behavior but none of it was against the rules. I still removed them based on vibes because they made everyone, especially myself, very uncomfortable and would not listen when told to stop.

A user who made everything about themself. They would derail every conversation to talk about something they did, often unrelated to the current topic, talk over others to praise themself on something, never listen to other people, interrupt others to talk about how they would've done something better, etc. Not against the rules! But it sure is annoying! I removed them because they constantly brought the mood down by making others feel like they had no place to speak.

Multiple users who only spread negativity. Almost always taking worst faith stances on things, barging into perfectly fine conversations with some overly negative angle all the time, sometimes I'd tell them to stop and they'd say it's just for fun, but it's not very fun when all you accomplish is ruining the mood, is it?

Any time something like this happens, Me and my mods make sure to take the person aside in DMs and explain the situation first, make it clear to them what they're doing wrong, and how we'd like them to stop, and if we still remove them then, it's their own fault. There have been plenty of times where someone was told to stop a certain behavior, and they understood and corrected accordingly.

I'm not removing these people because I suspect they might be secretly right-wing, or phobic, or whatever you're assuming when you say "dangerous", I remove them because they're annoying and don't listen, and I don't want annoying people like that in a simple little discord community that I made for people who like what I do to hang out with each other and have a good time. I have to manage that community and if there's too many problems that becomes hard, and it'll just be a less nice place to be. It's not that deep.

[sacredfixation]

Hear me out, Mobius writes a formal report about how Loki weaponized tie etiquette.

TVA REPORT – INCIDENT #42791: Unauthorized Interrogation Conduct

Filed by: Agent Mobius M. Mobius

Subject: Loki Laufeyson – Tie Fixation Incident

Date: [REDACTED]

Incident Overview:

During a routine interrogation with Subject Loki Laufeyson, an unexpected and unauthorized proximity breach occurred. The subject approached me, under the pretense of delivering a condescending verbal response, and proceeded to adjust my tie without consent. This action was accompanied by a thinly veiled attempt at manipulation, culminating in the subject referring to me as “adorable.” The interaction, while brief, resulted in a significant lapse in professional decorum and personal space boundaries.

Behavioral Analysis:

1.Physical Proximity Violation:

Loki reduced the standard interrogator-subject distance to approximately 6 inches. This is a violation of TVA protocol, which clearly states that agents are to maintain a minimum of 3 feet from subjects unless restraint measures are in progress. The proximity was entirely unnecessary and likely employed as a deliberate power move.

2. Unauthorized Tie Adjustment:

At no point did I request assistance with my tie. The subject’s action was both unprompted and overly familiar. Though the adjustment was technically correct, it appeared to serve no purpose beyond asserting dominance in an intimate, disarming manner.

3. Verbal Commentary:

The subject concluded the interaction by calling me “adorable” in a tone that was neither overtly insulting nor explicitly complimentary, but ambiguously condescending. This form of address is inconsistent with typical manipulative language, raising the possibility that it was intended to provoke confusion or personal distraction.

Emotional and Psychological Impact:

Post-incident, I experienced:

-Mild Disorientation: Resulting from the unexpected nature of the interaction.

-Persistent Overanalysis: Due to the ambiguity of the subject’s intent (power play? flirtation? both?).

-Internal Discomfort: Stemming from an acute awareness of how my tie now feels whenever worn, as if perpetually connected to the subject’s interference.

Recommendation for Future Interrogations:

1. Maintain Greater Physical Distance: Implement a mandatory minimum of 5 feet when interacting with Loki Laufeyson, as he has demonstrated a proclivity for exploiting personal space to unnerve TVA agents.

2. No Accessorized Weakness: TVA agents should avoid wearing easily manipulated items (e.g., ties, scarves, jewelry) during interactions with Loki to prevent similar incidents.

3. Clarify Intent Post-Incident: In the future, should similar behavior occur, it may be beneficial to directly address the subject’s intent at the time, e.g., “Are you fixing my tie or trying to throw me off balance?”

Final Note:

This report is not filed out of personal embarrassment but in the interest of maintaining TVA professionalism and preventing future… tie-related incidents. Further observation of Loki’s interpersonal tactics is warranted, particularly regarding whether his penchant for destabilizing agents via proximity and unsolicited compliments is part of a larger strategy or merely a deeply irritating quirk.

End of report.

[yuechihua]

i think anaxa is capable of all-consuming devotion and obsession that walks the fine line between genius and madness, which is to say, necromancy is sooooo on the table, gamers <3

[anendtopursuit]

the ghosts fandom spending years waiting for the captain's name (because "the captain" is a mouthful), being given a name, and then collectively realising how fucking weird it feels to call him by anything but his rank is so funny to me

[eveningrainstorm]

he's not joking

[equalperson]

thinking about how often I see people try to point out the sanism of concepts like "narcissistic abuse" by saying "oh, you wouldn't call people with THIS diagnosis abusive for it!" and while I certainly agree with the basic point, this is just. such a flawed way of going about it.

"you wouldn't call it 'schizophrenic abuse!'" I have seen countless people call their loved ones abusive for being schizophrenic.

"you wouldn't call it '[non-cluster B PD] abuse!'" I've seen tiktoks armchair-diagnosing abusers with paranoid personality, supposed "experts" have treated schizoidism as a risk factor for becoming a serial killer, and some guy wrote an entire book labeling people from every cluster as "emotional vampires."

"you wouldn't call it 'alcoholic abuse!'" ??? why have I seen this one multiple times. "alcohol parent/spouse" is an extremely common shorthand for abuse.

don't get Me wrong, I fully believe in calling out sanism when you see it, but I also believe it's counterproductive to defend one group only by erasing the vitriol directed towards another.

here's a rule of thumb that basically never fails: if there's any diagnostic group that you believe isn't widely dehumanized, it's just because you haven't been in a position to witness it before.

[letmetellyouaboutmyfeels]

Last Line Game

I was tagged by the darling @thisissirius forever ago and I haven't really been writing fanfic lately but I am dashing off bits and pieces of WinterJones as I can so, here, have the last line I wrote for them!

“Jamie?” Jones says very carefully, and oh Jamie needs to hear him say his first name more, a lot more. ��I’m going to put my hand on your shoulder. Is that okay?”

and yes this is from the omega!Winter ABO fic nobody hates me more than I hate myself