#AI scanner

[pastelporcini]

AI scanners are such a fucking joke and it’s not funny at all.

I was writing my final English essay, and I put a lot of effort into it. It took a long time, like 40 something minutes, but I finished it and turned it in hoping to get a good grade.

It was flagged as AI by 5 different scanners. FIVE. DIFFERENT. SCANNERS.

I worked so hard on that stupid essay and all I got in return was having to desperately plead to my teacher that I DID in fact write it. I’ve had this teacher for 3 years now (I do in-person online classes and he oversees online work) so thankfully he didn’t penalize me or have me redo it because he knows I wouldn’t use AI. I got lucky, but what if it happened with a teacher who didn’t know me well enough to trust me on this??

I’m so tired of AI scanners. They don’t do their job correctly. I’ve heard so many classmates brag about using AI and getting good grades for it, but the moment I put in actual effort I get flagged FIVE TIMES????

It’s just such a fucking joke. AI scanners aren’t accurate, they just flag anything that has a formal/monotonous tone and uses big words. Which isn’t even accurate to the AI I have seen before. Why am I getting in trouble for putting in effort but the lazy jerk next to me gets an A for using chatgpt?? It’s just not fair and I’m so so incredibly frustrated I can’t even begin to explain it.

I don’t even think there’s ever going to be a way AI scanners can accurately tell what is AI and what isn’t, because it only flags certain writing styles. Not just AI uses these writing styles!! Where do you think it learned that from!! You cannot possibly tell what is AI and what isn’t just based off of that. It’s unfair, inaccurate, and screws over anyone who actually tries on their work. It’s bullshit.

[aihumanizerpro]

Will AI Ever Sound Human? Try AI Humanizer Pro to Bridge the Gap

Artificial intelligence has already transformed the way content is written in the modern age. From drafting a speedy email to preparing lengthy reports and blog posts, on-demand AI means written content is now being created in seconds. The question on everyone's mind is: Can AI really sound like a human? Can it replicate emotions, cultural nuances, and an author's voice like a human?

Let's discuss why human writing is different, how much AI has developed, and how applications such as AI Humanizer Pro are bridging the communication gap by converting mechanical AI content into natural and interesting content.

What Makes Human Writing Unique?

Human words are more than perfect grammar and elegant design—it is alive with emotion, instinct, and real-life experience. People weave words together to connect, words that resonate with the reader. Whether it's a sincere tweet or an engaging article, human words foster empathy and connection.

AI does not possess feelings. While it mimics tone and structure but fails to replicate emotion. This is why it is so necessary to humanize AI content. Converting AI content to human language makes words have a genuine and substantiative quality to them that raw AI content cannot ever produce consistently.

How AI has Progressed in Imitating Language?

Artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini have progressed significantly in providing precise and contextually appropriate text. They are quick, handy, and popular. Nonetheless, even with all the developments, AI is unable to replicate the subtle phrases used in real human writing.

This is where AI Humanizer Pro comes into play. It refines simple AI-produced content with rhythm, warmth, and a personal tone—so it reads like it was written by a real person. This adjustment is more than improved readability—it’s about genuine connection through words.

AI Writing Still Has a Robotized Feeling?

Even with fast advancements, AI does not have genuine understanding. It is taught from patterns and data—never from life. That's why its work may seem flat, excessively pedantic, or emotionally flat.

In academic and artistic environments, it is even more evident. Slightly edited AI content is enough to raise alarms in tools such as Turnitin or GTPZero. That's why using AI alone is dangerous in environments where authenticity and uniqueness are paramount. Turning AI into human content is no longer a choice – it's a necessity.

What Sets AI Humanizer Pro Apart?

AI Humanizer Pro has been developed to rewrite robotic language into natural and human-like communication. It is not a simple paraphrasing tool—it modifies style, tone, and emotion and provides content as if a real person had written it.

What makes it even more distinctive is its Zero AI Mode, which keeps your content undetected by standard AI check tool functions. It even scans your text against eight leading detection engines to guarantee that your text passes as naturally human-written.

From Robotic to Real: The Impact 

Users indicate that the scores of detection decrease from above 85% to below 5% following the use of AI Humanizer. More significantly, the rewritten content is expressive, empathetic, and better at resonating with audiences. 

Can AI Truly Write like Human? 

AI alone is still incapable of capturing the full richness of human writing. By using AI Humanizer Pro, however, we are now able to make AI-written content read much more naturally. We’re not about replacing writers—just about making AI communication truly human.

[lucid-daydreamer]

You may be entitled to financial compensation! XD

A form of the mineral riebeckite is blue asbestos.

Text under the cut for translation

Panel one:

"Thanks for bringing this with you."

"There is a wall I've been dying to translate!"

Panel two:

"oh."

"If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma..."

[pain-tool-sai]

❄️ (watercolor and colored pencil on cotton rag paper)

[skibasyndrome]

nothing motivates me to keep editing and writing even if it is so so so so fucking exhausting like seeing fucking AI fic and feeling a rage so ancient

[crescenthistory]

you gave your views on ai, which I completely agree with. What would you do if you suspected a writer was posting works made by AI? I know myself and a few other authors in a smaller fandom have all been accused of using AI and it's so frustrating - two have english as a second language, but myself and another speak english natively - so I was wondering how you'd approach that as it's so easy to be accused of it. our fics always come through with AI detected through most AI checkers.

i am against ai as adamantly as i am against accusing people of ai

i shared my thoughts on this a little in academic contexts, but i think that accusations of ai are always biassed and can be marginalising. people accuse "too good" and "too bad" writing of being generated, both of which can be explained by a variety of reasons such as writing in a second language, being a perfectionist, having adopted writing styles from classics, etc. to immediately assume ai and pointing fingers can be so disheartening and discrediting. don't be inhumane in your attempt at keeping fanfiction human!

you don't know if someone has used ai and not, and if they have, there is frankly nothing you can do about it. approaching them would either result in an innocent writer feeling awful or an ai-user doubling down. no one will be enlightened with you intervening, no one will stop using ai bc you accused them of it. so in my opinion, you can only ever cause harm with accusations.

if you see a work you think has been written with ai, just don't interact with it. don't interact and maybe even block them if you feel the need. if it is attention they want, take that from them.

going on smear campaigns against writers you think might use ai or sending someone else's fic through ai scanners is quite frankly insane behaviour to me. we are not employed to go on a witchhunt against ai users and will be actively demolishing what should be a safe place if we start pointing fingers left and right.

if you get accused of ai, i would honestly consider just deleting the ask/comment and not entertaining it. there is no great way to handle it or make it stop, other than not using ai and being prepared that accusations like that will most likely fly in for people all around.

[karamoraofficial]

Yeah... so veoh doesn't like that im committing cyber crimes and keeps taking down videos. So Archive.org it is.

Sorry to those who didn't want to actively download anything, but it's probably the best i can get you right now :/

If anyone has any alternate sites i can upload videos to, that would be appreciated. For now, I'll just be burning the rest of the episodes and placing the files on archive.org

[annaholak]

Note to self: surrounding yourself with bats won’t heal your bat-shaped heartache

[depoteka]

just saw an ai generated image of the white cliffs of dover. you know, that real life place that there are multiple real photos of available on the internet

[beigetiger]

Zentangle hands

[soapdispensersalesman]

[pain-tool-sai]

(watercolor on cotton rag and wood pulp paper) - i wanted to draw this outfit but my reference picture was so low res i ended up taking a bunch of creative liberties with it (‘-‘* )

[skibasyndrome]

How do you know when someone is using ai, I'm so afraid to read a story that was written from stolen art... I know a lot of people don't even tag that it's made from ai it's a bit frustrating. Even more so that it apparently is done in our fandom 😭

Hey anon! Thanks for sending this ask, this is certainly a topic I feel very strongly about 🥲 I feel your frustration and I WISH I had an easy answer, but I don't, so here goes a lot of... musings about what I generally do:

Okay, first of all, I'm really not an expert on this, I'm just collecting info and experience as I go. Secondly, there's sadly no very sure-fire way to tell, at least as far as I know. It's honestly just a bunch of hints that, when they show up together and to an alarming extent, could point towards it being an AI-generated text that you're dealing with.

Things that I usually look out for/that AI texts I've been dealing with in the past have included:

the overall "feeling" is often that these texts are grammatically/linguistically correct, but the content feels "off". sort of difficult to explain, but when you feel like someone who has seemingly perfectly mastered the language they're writing in is lacking in the content department in a way that feels like it shouldn't go together, that's a hint

the text feels overly formulaic, like... the sentences are technically correct, but they don't flow very well

there are weird jumps between scenes that seem random and unmotivated

phrases and sentence structures are repeated throughout without much variation; this can happen on a story level as well, like there's a feeling of "wait, why are we here again, I thought this already happened/they already said that/they already made this clear" etc. (and for this one especially there's nuance required, because this can be an artistic choice, but the repetition feels utterly unmotivated and, different aspect, it "feels" - based on the language - like the author would not "accidentally" make this many repetitions)

there's a sort of.... flatness to the style. again, this one is very, very vibes-based, but it feels like you're unable to grasp a stylistic through line or the writer's voice in a way you can in other fics/with other authors; it's not that the story necessarily lacks rhetoric devices, but when there are metaphors etc there's no overarching sense of... intentionality behind it?

sometimes, mistakes can sneak in. like maybe suddenly a character is wearing something else, has a different hair color, etc

the dialogue is overly formal, stiff, lacking a sense of uniqueness

with fanfic especially: does it feel like the text is taking the source material into consideration? this one, obviously, is also difficult to apply, because the fanfic spectrum between writing retellings of canon and very far removed AUs is vast and beautiful, but - does it feel like the character is the one you know from the show? does he do or say things that make him seem like that character? or at the very least, is it likely that the version you're reading about is someone's understanding of that character? does it feel like the author has seen the show? if the answer is no, like if the characters feel a bit like you could exchange them with any other character out there or if they behave very cardboard-cutout-like - that might be a hint

sometimes you run into scenes that you remember from other fics. this as well can of course be a coincidence, but if it happens a lot - that's a hint

There are probably more thing, but that's what I could think of off the top of my head. Now I know none of these are easy to spot, and, really, it's a lot about reading and getting a sense of... huh... does this feel like it's coming from someone who had something unique they wanted to tell me? Does this feel like one person sat down and wrote it all?

When there are any of the signs up there present or you just have an overall weird feeling about a text, then you can try to use an AI scanner to confirm. Again, these aren't perfect either, and it's all about trying out different things. It helps when you try it out with a bunch of other texts that you know for a fact are human-made. Then you get a feeling for what the "baseline" percentage is. Some scanners will say something like 0% or 5% ai-content for human-made texts, but it's best if you just try it out with enough different texts to see where you land. And then try to put the suspected fic in there. When there's a huge jump compared to texts you know are human-made - well. that's a pretty, pretty big hint. You can also try running it through different scanners to see if the results stay consistent. It's definitely not perfect, but it gets you somewhere at least. Also always consider that sometimes people don't use 100% ai-generated text. They might paste together different texts and add a couple lines in between, so it's always a question of the "bigger picture".

Idk if any of this was helpful, but I hope it was! If anyone else has any tips please share, because I wanna know and I'm sure anon does, too! I'm. Yeah. I hate where we are with this topic, I hate that people think this is okay to do, I hate hate hate hate hate ai-generated trash that's being sold as fic and I hate that somehow it's now our job as readers to figure this out. Fuck that shit.

Also, final disclaimer: none of the things I listed are necessarily unique to ai fic, they can show up in a lot of ways in human works and we always have to be careful about assessing fics

[tunniaslikestodraw]

bubbuhs. Gregor Samsa Loses His Mind in Hysteria. Sophomore year of high school.

I made this one for an assignment a few years ago. We had to make a playlist for a book we read earlier in the year --- I chose Franz Kafka's Metamorphosis --- and then illustrate two of the songs. I thought "Lose My Mind in Hysteria" was the perfect song in the playlist for Gregor's twilight moments.

[recently-reanimated]

I like when some tech bro proposes AI to fix something in healthcare. As if a large problem in hospitals isn't health care professionals acting like robots towards patients instead of having sympathy.

[artofgeppetto]

why do we just live in the worst timeline....

@hatr @fasterthanlime