#Attorney Web Development

[dbanerjee]

Top SEO Solutions for Personal Injury Lawyers: How D.Banerjee Stands Out

When it comes to finding top SEO solutions for personal injury lawyers, D.Banerjee stands out by offering a strategic, customized approach that drives real results. Specializing in Personal Injury Attorney Marketing, D. Banerjee understands the unique challenges attorneys face in a competitive legal market. His services include comprehensive keyword research, hyper-local SEO targeting like San Jose Local SEO, content optimization, mobile-first Attorney Web Development, and robust backlink strategies, all tailored specifically for personal injury law firms.

As an experienced SEO consultant in San Jose, he uses advanced tools and AI-driven analytics to boost organic traffic, enhance user engagement, and strengthen Google rankings. Going beyond traditional techniques, D. Banerjee incorporates voice search optimization, Google Business Profile enhancements, and authority-building content aligned with the latest Digital Marketing and SEO best practices. His transparent approach, measurable KPIs, and continuous strategy refinements ensure law firms not only attract more leads but also convert them into loyal clients. Personal injury attorneys who partner with D.Banerjee benefit from industry-specific SEO strategies, ethical link building, and conversion-focused websites. By blending legal marketing expertise with cutting-edge digital solutions, D.Banerjee empowers attorneys to build a dominant online presence, outperform local competitors, and achieve lasting SEO success.

[casefoxinc]

Are you seeking standout website design for your law firm?

Look no further! CaseFox offers SEO-optimized, accessible, and custom law firm website design and development services tailored to your needs. Enhance your online presence and attract more clients today.

To receive a Flat $200 Discount — visit our website and fill out the form: https://www.casefox.com/law-firm-website-design/

or

email us at: marketing@casefox.com.

[udaipurwebdesigner1]

Law Firm Website Design in India, Attorney Website Design, Lawyer Website Development

At Udaipur Web Designer, we offer affordable services of Law Firm Website Design in India. Grow your business with our service of attorney website design in India. We offer the best law firm website development services in India, for modern SEO-optimized law firm sites with user-friendly CMSs. Our dynamic small law firm websites attract more cases and expand your practice. We offer premium quality services of lawyer web development in India. Udaipur Web Designer is the top law firm website development company in India. Our professional lawyer websites help increases your business. With our skilled and professional team of experts, we deliver many small firm websites at an affordable price.

[webyking]

How Much Should You Spend on Building a Law Firm Website?

Discover what it really costs to build a law firm website, with insights on balancing quality and affordability.

[zozotheme]

Top & Trendy Law Firm WordPress Theme 2024

⚖️ Elevate Your Legal Practice with Igual - The Pinnacle of Law Firm WordPress Themes! ⚖️✨

Unleash the power of a compelling online presence with Igual - meticulously crafted to redefine excellence in the legal realm. 🏛️🚀

🌟 Key Features: ✅ Sleek & Professional Design ✅ Attorney Showcase and Profiles ✅ Case Studies and Legal Insights ✅ Appointment Booking System ✅ Seamless Contact Forms ✅ Mobile Responsive & SEO-Optimized

🏆 Why Choose Igual? Experience the perfect synergy of aesthetics and functionality. Igual empowers your law firm to stand out, showcase expertise, and attract clients effortlessly.

Position your law firm as a beacon of trust and competence. Invest in Igual, where justice meets innovation! 🌐⚖️

Read More 👉 https://1.envato.market/a1BQLQ

We provide high-quality SEO-friendly website themes and templates with 100% responsive design.

Explore it ► https://zozothemes.com/

[naileadevoras]

* taps mic * is this thing on ? hi pookies ! it's the week before christmas & today , i'm presenting to you all a list of different occupations for your muses . i've categorized them based on alphabetical order for a neater look & it'll be easier for you all to read / browse through . i hope you find this masterlist helpful !

a like + reblog would be greatly appreciated . happy holidays !

🎱 𝑨 - 𝑯 .

accountant

activist

actor / actress

aesthetician

animator

apartment flipper

art critique

artist

author

babysitter

baker

bank teller

barista

bartender

bellhop

bike messenger

body builder

body guard

book keeper

bookstore owner

bouncer

cake decorator

camp counselor

cars salesman

casino manager

casting director

chef

civic planner

comedian

computer engineer

concert promoter

construction worker

dentist

dermatologist

dietitian

doctor

disk jockey

diver

driver [ uber , lyft , private ]

emergency medical technician

entrepreneur

etsy shop owner

fast food employee

figure skater

firefighter

financial analyst

fisherman

florist

food deliverer [ postmates , uber eats , etc ]

food critic

former child star

former miss universe

funeral director

game developer

guidance counselor

hair dresser

hair stylist

high school teacher

🎱 𝑰 - 𝑸 .

influencer

interior decorator

investor

janitor

journalist

judge

kindergarten teacher

lab assistant [ biology / chemistry lab ]

lifeguard

line cook

maid

make up artist

manager

marine biologist

marriage / family therapist

massage therapist

matchmaker

mechanical engineer

mobile app developer

mortician

motorcycle mechanic

nail technician

nurse practitioner

nursing professor

obstetrician

pageant queen

physiotherapist

piercer

pilot for commercial airlines

plastic surgeon

police officer

personal stylist

private attorney

private chef

professional athlete [ football , basketball , soccer ]

professional boxer

professional chess player

professional esports player

professional mermaid

professional photographer

professor

programmer

public relations

quality control inspector

🎱 𝑹 - 𝒁 .

real estate agent

receptionist

relationship counselor

respiratory therapist

retail employee

sales person

set designer / illustrator

singer

small business owner

socialite

social media curator

social media intern

song - writer

sports agent

stunt double

tattoo artist

teacher's assistant

tour guide

tour manager

translator

travel writer [ journalist ]

twitch streamer

ultrasound technologist

veterinarian / vet assistant

waiter / waitress

web art director

yoga instructor

zoologist

[ashenwyvern]

I had a random thought, only five AA games are actually the story of their protagonist. Those being Justice For All, Dual Destinies, Spirit of Justice, and TGAA1. (AAI2 is in a weird place but I’ll explain that at the end so spoilers for that game as well)

Like, I know each protagonist is important to the story, but it’s still not their story.

The original Ace attorney is all about the consequences of DL6 (Red White and Mia’s death, Miles and Von Karma) and Miles’ redemption. Phoenix is just the catalyst for it all to start unraveling.

Then Trials and Tribulations was the story of the Feys and how Misty’s disappearance and the inter-family politics destroyed the lives of so many. It’s also Diego’s story to a lesser extent, of him learning to grieve and let go of his anger. Again, Phoenix is just the one being dragged into this mess due to his connection with Mia and Maya. (I would argue that dealing with your evil ex is definitely your story, but that part is so completely overshadowed by the family drama that it is a side plot.)

Apollo Justice was the story of the Grammaryes and the Gavin brothers and how one family destroyed itself while Klavier realized just how fucked up his brother is and the part he had to play in Kristoph’s schemes. Not to mention Phoenix and his disbarment and him learning to trust Apollo, going from practically taking over the defense from him in case 1 to trusting him with winning the Misham case in case 4.

AAI1 is the story of Kay Faraday and the legacy of the Yatagarasu. Miles is there because he happened to be the one with the necessary information and ability to solve the case when it became an international incident, but he does not go through any character development during that time.

TGAA2 is the story of the Professor killings, and Kazuma and Van Zeiks’ families, the misdeeds of Lord Stronghart and the the tangled web of lies that was woven in order to protect the corrupt system. Ryunosuke went through his character development of growing into a proper lawyer in the first game so he’s free to be the catalyst here.

AAI2 is weird however, it is Miles’ story, of learning what it truly means to follow his father’s legacy and learning that he can do that in his own way as a prosecutor. But it is equally the story of Simeon and his misguided revenge, and how authority and the system can so completely fail a person that it drives them to extreme measures. AAI2 is two stories borne of the same tragedy.

[ausetkmt]

Marion County woman accused of shooting Black neighbor dead is in custody, sheriff's office says

The woman accused of shooting her neighbor dead on Friday is in custody Tuesday night, according to the Marion County Sheriff’s Office and attorneys for the victim.

Investigators say 35-year-old A.J. Owens confronted the neighbor for throwing a skate at her children. Owens went and knocked on that neighbor's door and was ultimately shot through it.Civil rights attorney Ben Crump is defending Owens’ family. Crump tweeted, “The unidentified 58-year-old white woman connected to the shooting death of Ajike 'AJ' Owens has been arrested.

#JusticeForAJ.” Related: 'Why isn't she in jail?': Protestors demand answers after Ocala woman shot dead through neighbor's front doorAt last check, the subject had not been formally placed under arrest, but a spokesperson for the sheriff's office said, “that should occur imminently.”

Protestors went to the Ocala courthouse on Tuesday to demand the shooter be arrested. They say Owens' death was unjustified and that the neighbor had called her children racial slurs. Watch the protest below.The State Attorney's Office said in a statement earlier Tuesday, "Our office is actively working with the Marion County Sheriff's Office on their ongoing investigation.

When all of the evidence has been gathered and evaluated, our office will make a prompt filing decision on the case."Crump is expected to address the public on Wednesday at noon from Ocala.This is a developing story.

Sheriff: 'Neighborhood feud' led to Ocala woman being shot through door, killed

MARION COUNTY, Fla. —

The woman accused of shooting her neighbor dead on Friday is in custody Tuesday night, according to the Marion County Sheriff’s Office and attorneys for the victim.

Investigators say 35-year-old A.J. Owens confronted the neighbor for throwing a skate at her children. Owens went and knocked on that neighbor's door and was ultimately shot through it.

Civil rights attorney Ben Crump is defending Owens’ family. Crump tweeted, “The unidentified 58-year-old white woman connected to the shooting death of Ajike 'AJ' Owens has been arrested. #JusticeForAJ

.”

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

Related: 'Why isn't she in jail?': Protestors demand answers after Ocala woman shot dead through neighbor's front door

At last check, the subject had not been formally placed under arrest, but a spokesperson for the sheriff's office said, “that should occur imminently.”

Protestors went to the Ocala courthouse on Tuesday to demand the shooter be arrested. They say Owens' death was unjustified and that the neighbor had called her children racial slurs. Watch the protest below.

Video Player is loading.

Current Time 0:00

Duration 0:00

Remaining Time 0:00

The State Attorney's Office said in a statement earlier Tuesday, "Our office is actively working with the Marion County Sheriff's Office on their ongoing investigation. When all of the evidence has been gathered and evaluated, our office will make a prompt filing decision on the case."

Crump is expected to address the public on Wednesday at noon from Ocala. This is a developing story.

[creativepromptsforwriting]

Hi, I love your blog it is SO helpful! <3 I am writing a fanfiction with original characters and I am struggling so badly trying to figure out what jobs these people would have (as extremely wealthy people) My brain always goes to like business man in the city, and that is SO broad and I can't think of what these jobs could be. Is there a chance you could make a list of jobs of any type really if it isn't too much? Thank you! :D

Hi and thank you, I'm happy it's helpful for you!

I actually have a list in my queue for the weekend that is a Workplace AU list. So places where people can work in AU stories. But I could also think about doing a whole job list. Since that AU list in coming up, I'm just going to leave a few suggestions for your specific case here for you:

High-paying jobs in the city:

Business + IT sector:

chief executive officer

chief marketing officer

chief information officer

project manager

sales manager

corporate counsel

software engineer

web developer

engineering manager

IT systems manager

data scientist

cloud engineer

analytics manager

Judicial branch:

judge

attorney

lawyer

corporate lawyer

Financial sector:

investment banker

broker

financial planning and analysis manager

Medical sector:

cardiologist

neurologist

psychiatrist

surgeon

dentist

orthodontist

anesthesiologists

clinical pharmacist

clinical director

- Jana

[thedialoguedilemma]

The Dilemma Bulletin: Tuesday January 21st, 2025

Keeping you informed about the daily events of the Trump Administration

Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde called out the disgusting anti immigration rhetoric perpetuated by the Trump-Vance administration straight to their faces as they sat front row at the National Cathedral

January 6th terrorists members of the Oath Keepers Stewart Rhodes and Proud Boys Enrique Tarrio are released from prison after Trump clemency

Meta is claiming to fix an issue censoring Democrat search terms on Instagram

Trump rescinds Biden Executive Order lowering prescriptions for Medicare and Medicaid participants

Trump justifies pardons in press conference of Jan 6th terrorists who attacked, harmed and killed cops.

Trumps Inauguration viewership lowest in years. Biden had higher viewership.

Attorney Generals from over 18 states sue Trump admin over birthright citizenship Executive Order

Elon Musk doubles down justification on Nazi salute at the Trump Victory Celebration

Trump announces billions of dollars to the private sector for development of Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure to OpenAI, SoftBank and Oracle

Trump revoked a Biden admin memo allowing ICE to make arrests near churches and schools.

Trump lays off all federal employees that were hired based on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives.

Netflix to increase subscription prices after meeting with Trump

Trump pardons Ross Ulbricht; who ran a massive dark web undercover black market drug website called the Silk Road.

[mariacallous]

In March 2007, Google’s then senior executive in charge of acquisitions, David Drummond, emailed the company’s board of directors a case for buying DoubleClick. It was an obscure software developer that helped websites sell ads. But it had about 60 percent market share and could accelerate Google’s growth while keeping rivals at bay. A “Microsoft-owned DoubleClick represents a major competitive threat,” court papers show Drummond writing.

Three weeks later, on Friday the 13th, Google announced the acquisition of DoubleClick for $3.1 billion. The US Department of Justice and 17 states including California and Colorado now allege that the day marked the beginning of Google’s unchecked dominance in online ads—and all the trouble that comes with it.

The government contends that controlling DoubleClick enabled Google to corner websites into doing business with its other services. That has resulted in Google allegedly monopolizing three big links of a vital digital advertising supply chain, which funnels over $12 billion in annual revenue to websites and apps in the US alone.

It’s a big amount. But a government expert estimates in court filings that if Google were not allegedly destroying its competition illegally, those publishers would be receiving up to an additional hundreds of millions of dollars each year. Starved of that potential funding, “publishers are pushed to put more ads on their websites, to put more content behind costly paywalls, or to cease business altogether,” the government alleges. It all adds up to a subpar experience on the web for consumers, Colorado attorney general Phil Weiser says.

“Google is able to extract hiked-up costs, and those are passed on to consumers,” he alleges. “The overall outcome we want is for consumers to have more access to content supported by advertising revenue and for people who are seeking advertising not to have to pay inflated costs.”

Google disputes the accusations.

Starting today, both sides’ arguments will be put to the test in what’s expected to be a weekslong trial before US district judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia. The government wants her to find that Google has violated federal antitrust law and then issue orders that restore competition. In a best-case scenario, according to several Google critics and experts in online ads who spoke with WIRED, internet users could find themselves more pleasantly informed and entertained.

It could take years for the ad market to shake out, says Adam Heimlich, a longtime digital ad executive who’s extensively researched Google. But over time, fresh competition could lower supply chain fees and increase innovation. That would drive “better monetization of websites and better quality of websites,” says Heimlich, who now runs AI software developer Chalice Custom Algorithms.

Tim Vanderhook, CEO of ad-buying software developer Viant Technology, which both competes and partners with Google, believes that consumers would encounter a greater variety of ads, fewer creepy ads, and pages less cluttered with ads. “A substantially improved browsing experience,” he says.

Of course, all depends on the outcome of the case. Over the past year, Google lost its two other antitrust trials—concerning illegal search and mobile app store monopolies. Though the verdicts are under appeal, they’ve made the company’s critics optimistic about the ad tech trial.

Google argues that it faces fierce competition from Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, and others. It further contends that customers benefited from each of the acquisitions, contracts, and features that the government is challenging. “Google has designed a set of products that work efficiently with each other and attract a valuable customer base,” the company’s attorneys wrote in a 359-page rebuttal.

For years, Google publicly has maintained that its ad tech projects wouldn’t harm clients or competition. “We will be able to help publishers and advertisers generate more revenue, which will fuel the creation of even more rich and diverse content on the internet,” Drummond testified in 2007 to US senators concerned about the DoubleClick deal’s impact on competition and privacy. US antitrust regulators at the time cleared the purchase. But at least one of them, in hindsight, has said he should have blocked it.

Deep Control

The Justice Department alleges that acquiring DoubleClick gave Google “a pool of captive publishers that now had fewer alternatives and faced substantial switching costs associated with changing to another publisher ad server.” The global market share of Google’s tool for publishers is now 91 percent, according to court papers. The company holds similar control over ad exchanges that broker deals (around 70 percent) and tools used by advertisers (85 percent), the court filings say.

Google’s dominance, the government argues, has “impaired the ability of publishers and advertisers to choose the ad tech tools they would prefer to use and diminished the number and quality of viable options available to them.”

The government alleges that Google staff spoke internally about how they have been earning an unfair portion of what advertisers spend on advertising, to the tune of over a third of every $1 spent in some cases.

Some of Google’s competitors want the tech giant to be broken up into multiple independent companies, so each of its advertising services competes on its own merits without the benefit of one pumping up another. The rivals also support rules that would bar Google from preferencing its own services. “What all in the industry are looking for is fair competition,” Viant’s Vanderhook says.

If Google ad tech alternatives win more business, not everyone is so sure that the users will notice a difference. “We’re talking about moving from the NYSE to Nasdaq,” Ari Paparo, a former DoubleClick and Google executive who now runs the media company Marketecture, tells WIRED. The technology behind the scenes may shift, but the experience for investors—or in this case, internet surfers—doesn’t.

Some advertising experts predict that if Google is broken up, users’ experiences would get even worse. Andrey Meshkov, chief technology officer of ad-block developer AdGuard, expects increasingly invasive tracking as competition intensifies. Products also may cost more because companies need to not only hire additional help to run ads but also buy more ads to achieve the same goals. “So the ad clutter is going to get worse,” Beth Egan, an ad executive turned Syracuse University associate professor, told reporters in a recent call arranged by a Google-funded advocacy group.

But Dina Srinivasan, a former ad executive who as an antitrust scholar wrote a Stanford Technology Law Review paper on Google’s dominance, says advertisers would end up paying lower fees, and the savings would be passed on to their customers. That future would mark an end to the spell Google allegedly cast with its DoubleClick deal. And it could happen even if Google wins in Virginia. A trial in a similar lawsuit filed by Texas, 15 other states, and Puerto Rico is scheduled for March.

[cutecipher]

"If the proposed remedies barring all search payments to browser developers are adopted by the court, these misguided plans would be a direct hit to small and independent browsers—the very forces that keep the web open, innovative and free."

BULLSHIT

[gayguybln]

Dylan is going to prison voluntarily. The 25 year old guy was a spoiled guy. Seven years ago his parents donated him their company and their entire houses and land as they decided to live in Africa and do developement work. Dylan was more interested in drinking and in gambling than in running the company. After three years he sold the company and became billionaire. But he was bored. Sexually he dived into bondage and role plays. Sometimes he disappeared for days to be a slave to a man, to a woman or to several people. On one day he thought that prison would be the ultimative bondage. And in the dark web he found an agent who can bring people into prison if they want. And Dylan wanted to be in prison.

Dylan negotiated a scenario with the agent. The result was: Dylan had to fill out a form giving probabilities of several timeframes of sentences. Based on this probabilities a computer chose one sentence. That sentence was sealed in an envelope. Dylan signed that envelope. The envelope would be opened when his lawyer visits him for the first time after arrest. After that Dylan had two to four weeks to take care of everything he had to. He gave the main house of his family to his best friend to live in as "he wants to start an adventure". After two weeks it was possible that he was arrested. 24 days after he signed the contract he eventually was arrested by headhunters. He was transferred to Louisiana where was searched for one count of vehicular homicide as they told them. He met his lawyer who was the agent who arranged this. The agent/lawyer gave him two envelopes. One small envelope containing his sentence and a larger envelope. "The large envelope contains your story. They'll put you into solitary this night. You'll stay there for two weeks. You have four days to read everything in the large envelope. After four days a guard will come and take it away. You'll read the crime you have committed. Every detail of it. You'll learn it" the lawyer/agent said. Dylan nodded, took the smaller envelope and asked: "This is my sentence?" - "Yes, it is. You can open it. This is what you'll get. All actors... the jury, the attorney and the judge have their instructions." - Dylan returned the envelope. He didn't want to know.

At the trial Dylan was sentenced to 15 years in prison. He was happy about that sentence. What an adventure... As he contacted his parents and told them that he'll spend 15 years in prison his father only told him to not let the soap drop. He hated these bigots since a long time...

[zozotheme]

Grab a creative #Igual - Law Firm WordPress Theme Just for $69!

Igual “Law Firm WordPress Theme” is designed for law firms, legal practices, attorneys, and other related businesses. This theme is packed with features that are tailored to meet the specific needs of law firms and attorneys, making it an ideal choice for any legal business looking to create a professional and modern online presence.

Some unique features of the Law Firm WordPress Theme include: Customizable Design Pre-built pages Lawyer Profiles Appointment Bookin SEO-Friendly Responsive Design

Read More ► https://1.envato.market/a1BQLQ

We provide high-quality SEO-friendly website themes and templates with 100% responsive design.

Explore it ► https://zozothemes.com/

[grits-galraisedinthesouth]

The Truth about the Jeffrey Epstein John Does: What the media and "influencers" are getting wrong.

TECHNO FOG substack DEC 19, 2023

There is a certain level of difficulty in reporting on the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell saga, much of it having to do with what the authorities haven’t revealed: the web of Epstein’s network (much of it still secret), the ties to intelligence (of which documentary evidence is still hidden from public view), the internal deliberations that went on at Main Justice in Washington, D.C. when Epstein got his sweetheart plea deal (again, not yet publicized).

Add to that the false media reports and blatantly inaccurate social media posts that spring up every time there’s any small development in any Epstein or Maxwell case.

Like today, for example.

The Daily Mail led the way, reporting that a federal judge “has ruled to unseal documents that would name 177 Does who are Epstein's friends, recruiters and victims within the coming weeks.” This was followed by a flurry of social media takes – especially on Twitter – promising there will be serious revelations from these records or claims that “177 Jeffrey Epstein high profile associates will be revealed in the new year.”

There’s a problem with that sensationalism: it’s inaccurate.

To explain what’s really going on, allow us to provide some context. Back in February of 2023, the Federal District Court Judge overseeing Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (the civil case brought against Maxwell by one of her victims) considered whether to publicly disclose the names of certain “John Does” that came up during the course of that litigation. The attorneys for Giuffre and Maxwell put together a list of 167 John Does and provided descriptive references for each, which would allow the Judge to determine which John Does should be unsealed and which ones should remain sealed.

At that time, we reviewed the list of John Does and assigned them various categories, including whether they were employees of Epstein, witnesses, or perpetrators; and whether their names were already known to the public. We were able to identify the most important alleged perpetrators and discussed the still-redacted facts surrounding their involvement with Epstein.

We also made clear that the majority of the John Does (approximately 100) had already been identified, whether through the media or court proceedings. Some had been interviewed by the media; their stories were already well known. We observed that many of the John Does were identified as not being involved in the more serious allegations against Epstein or Maxwell and that there were no “salacious” allegations against these individuals, some of whom were doctors or acquaintances of the victims. In some instances, the John Does were actual potential victims of Epstein or Maxwell.

And now for today’s developments.

The Judge has ordered the unsealing of names and materials relating to some – but not all – of the 167 John Does (not 177 as has been reported) identified in the list submitted to the Court. View the full order here.

As we clarified last February, the John Does who will be unsealed aren’t “Epstein’s List.” Their names were referenced in any number of ways during the civil case, whether through depositions, medical records (the names of doctors), or in witness lists exchanged between the parties. (To that we add a note of caution: witness lists can be very broad and not all witnesses are material or have even basic information.)

And again, many of the John Does were not alleged by the parties to have committed any wrongdoing. For example, John Doe 14 is referenced in one sealed court filing related to an effort by Maxwell to oppose answering deposition questions under seal. The “sealed material as to [John Doe 14] is not salacious.” He isn’t, as others have promised, a key figure in the Epstein/Maxwell crimes.

And that’s true for many of the other John Does. We’ve analyzed the prior John Doe lists and compared it to today’s order. Here’s the summary of our findings:

There are approximately 100 John Does who were previously identified. Some had been interviewed by the media. The names of others (including victims) had been discussed in Maxwell’s criminal trial. This includes victims and perpetrators.

Approximately 67 remain unidentified.

For 33 of the unknown John Does: the sealed material relating to them “is not salacious” or their name was in a search term or they were mentioned in a deposition. In the case of John Doe 88, “the only reference [of John Doe 88] is a deposition question in answer to which the deponent denied knowledge of the individual.”

Six of the unidentified John Does are victims whose names will not be released.

Six of the unidentified John Does were identified as either victim affiliates or alleged witnesses with connections to the victims. Their names and materials concerning them will be released.

The names, and materials relating to, a number of Epstein affiliates or former Epstein employees will be released. Records indicate - but do not guarantee - that the majority of these do not include salacious information.

The name and materials concerning John Doe 29 – a former Epstein employee – will be unsealed. The Judge described them as “a staff member possibly present at a time and place.” This might be an Epstein employee who was theorized by a witness to perhaps be present in a home when a victim was abused.

There are, however, John Does who may be significant. But that is a small number compared to the 167 John Does subject to the Judge’s order. We’ve summarized them below.

John Doe 58: An alleged witness, Epstein/Maxwell affiliate, and perpetrator. According to the Judge, “Doe 58's name and any identifying information shall remain sealed. Doe is a classic outsider, peripheral to the events at issue. Doe 58 is neither a victim nor associated with Epstein or Maxwell.”

As we previously noted about John Doe 58:

John Doe 86: An alleged Epstein affiliate. Counsel for Maxwell previously informed the Court that “Some material related to this individual is salacious.”  Materials relating to John Doe 86 will be “unsealed in full.”

John Doe 94: Previously identified as “alleged victim affiliate; alleged perpetrator” who “is alleged to have engaged in serious wrongdoing.” Materials relating to John Doe 94 will be “unsealed in full.”

John Doe 108: Previously identified as an “alleged witness.” These materials may potentially be salacious.

John Doe 113: Previously identified as “alleged Epstein affiliate; alleged witness” who “is alleged to have engaged in serious wrongdoing.” The Judge ruled these materials should be unsealed in full, and stated the references to John Doe 113 “are all included in Rule 26 disclosures, search terms, and a hearsay statement that the name appears in Epstein’s address book.”

John Doe 114: Previously identified as an “alleged Epstein affiliate.” Their name is on an Epstein flight log. These materials will be unsealed.

And there you have it. I hate to break the disappointing news, but we’re here to report the truth. The unsealing of these records and the publication of these names won’t be what we’ve been promised.

This doesn’t mean that important information won’t be disclosed, or that new and noteworthy discoveries may not be unearthed about known and unknown perpetrators. We believe that still may be the case.  

And we’ll provide the source documents when they’re released – which, depending on appeals, may be as soon as January 2, 2024.