#Classpect inversion

[tavtiers]

Classpect Opposite & Inverse Groupings

Given inverse and opposites, classpects seem to fall into neat groups of 8.

These groups are made up of a class opposite pair, their inverse/opposite pair, and the opposite aspect versions of them. Take the Sylph of Life, for example. The opposite of a Sylph of Life is a Maid of Doom. The Inverse of a Sylph of Life is a Prince of Doom. The opposite of a Prince of Doom is a Bard of Life, which in turn is the inverse of a Maid of Doom. 

That gives you: Sylph of Life, Maid of Doom, Prince of Doom, Bard of Life

Swap the aspects around and you also get: Sylph of Doom, Maid of Life, Prince of Life, Bard of Doom

In total this gives you an 8 classpect set. I have come up with defined names for each of these groups (with extra thrown in for Muse & Lord). Combine the Class and Aspect group names for the full name of your 8 classpect set.

In this case, the above set would be: those that Alter Energy to Influence. The aspect descriptions used come from bladekindeyewear.

Classes

Muse & Lord: Master Sylph, Bard, Maid, Prince: Alter Page, Rogue, Knight, Thief: Use Seer, Heir, Mage, Witch: Explore

Aspects (x)

Space/Time: Physical Existence Void/Light: Knowing & Perceiving Breath/Blood: Paths, Drive, Passion Life/Doom: Energy to Influence Mind/Heart: The Individual’s Impact Rage/Hope: Faith in Possibility

[taxi-boi]

grrr something something alternate calliope is a classpect inversion of calliope and her creation of the blackhole exemplifies this

blackholes are tied to the aspect of time both to their existence as destructive forces and their prominence in dead sessions.

the blackhole made by alternate calliope indescriminently destroys all inhabitants of the dream bubbles in order to kill lord english. which is the same thing le was doing. destroying everything in his path to find calliope

[weirdmageddon]

idiot child wears sunglasses over superhero mask more at 11

[snowtimeisbesttime]

all classpect interpretations are equally canon- and this is why:

sburb/sgrub/sname is many things, but the first of those things we see is a computer game. said game's source code can be found in carvings in the frog temple, which comes from a Reckoning meteor; so each sthing version's code comes specifically from itself!

and considering every session we've seen has had an unique frog temple (beta kids: 4 land spires; beta trolls: two separate temples with 6 land spires each; alpha kids: 8 land spires, alpha trolls: at least one temple (with 12 land spires??), possibly located on beforus' moon), there's no reason to assume each and every temple's carvings are exactly the same…

therefore, two swhatever instances can have drastically different classpect definitions because they're running different versions of the game! for example, my own mirrorbent's sgame was compiled in a way where i won't have to go into too many specifics from their own, separate, 12 land spires temple (as opposed to being widely distributed like the beta kids' sburb), and classwise features active knights and passive pages, to pick an example that was recentlyish polled about.

of course, this mini theory thingy would be most applicable to fanventures, while most classpecting theory revolves about homestuck proper for obvious reasons. luckily, i've got some Key Insights about the canon classpects, just beyond this readmore:

get mutie'd lmao!!!!

413 zillion kitys attack!!!!

[despazito]

homestuck wouldve been so much cooler if even one of bladekindeyewear’s big theories turned out to be true

[agentdanieljacobi]

your faves are NOT free!! heres dndads but homestuck

* i ate the gender alignments . the classes dont have genders anymore . also homestuck classes are different to dnd obviously bards in homestuck are wildly different to dnd bards ok anyway

[s1 dads]

darryl

- bard of rage

- prospit dreamer

-strife specibus: throwingaxekind . this is very specific they Have to be throwing axes .

henry

- heir of life

- derse dreamer

- strife specibus: staffkind , id say its a family heirloom (the one his dad fought with before . barry has a more powerful one now though)

glenn:

- knight of time

- derse dreamer

- strife specibus: guitarkind . "soren thats not a weapon" Guess the fuck what yes it is now . picture him fighting with a rlly cool guitar merged with an axe (from darryl) that he can use to TIME TRAVEL . (kinda like daves turntables but different)

ron:

- rogue of space

- prospit dreamer

- strife specibus: businesscardkind. i absolutely could give him a cooler better more fighty type of specibus but i think fighting with business cards is peak homestuck. also theres a char that fights with playing cards sooo uhh I Win nerd emoji

[kiddads]

grant:

- knight of doom

- prospit dreamer

- strife specibus: riflekind . What fucking else (if you saw the og version no you didnt stop lying)

lark:

- prince of blood

- derse dreamer

- strife specibus: clawglovekind . its like nepetas claws merged with a glove. also has a Gun .

sparrow:

-sylph of breath

- prospit dreamer

- strife specibus: also clawglovekind, has the other hand of the claw glove Thing . doesnt have any other weapon its Just that

nick:

- heir of void

- derse dreamer

- strife specibus: guitarbattleaxe kind . think battle axe of hatred p much . its glenns old guitar merged with a battleaxe but as he keeps leveling it up n shit its on fire and its So cool

terry jr:

- page of mind

- prospit dreamer

- strife specibus: pistolkind . crochet needles in the sylladex as a backup

[the teens]

lincoln:

- knight of hope

- prospit dreamer

- strife specibus: gunkind . he is Gun Person in the magical scenario .

normal:

- mage of blood

- derse dreamer

- strife specibus: staffkind!!!! it is the same henry and barry fought with but he doesnt know it

taylor:

- page of void

- prospit dreamer

- strife specibus: katanakind cuz What Else .!!!

scary:

- witch of doom

- derse dreamer

- strife specibus: pitchforkkind cuz i think its very fitting!! she can use it with her aspect too ,, she can use the bottom to direct doom energy to an enemy

hermie

- bard of heart

- derse dreamer

- stride specibus: needlekind . same needles he makes costumes with !!!

BONUS aka characters i classpected at random

willy: lord of doom . uses a fishing rod that does doom damage if it the hook hits u if that makes sense??

erin: witch of life. still unsure what shed use to fight though ......

paeden: thief of light . yes this is vriska classpect no i dont care

[sporkdoesclasspect]

if you wanna help gather some actually interesting results please do reblog! or don't ig, i can't tell you what to do :p

[eternityservedcold]

lets find out tumblrs collective aspect! (part 3: class pairs)

the top 3 pairs will move on to the next poll! (its like this because it maxes out at 10 options)

in lieu of longer explanations, as canon is severely lacking in those, here is the wiki page for classes. you can find laconic ones for a refresher under the cut

WITCH

one who manipulates their aspect or manipulates through their aspect. this class is canonically considered "active"

examples: jade harley, feferi peixes, damara megido

HEIR

one who changes their aspect or changes through their aspect. this class is canonically considered "passive"

examples: john egbert, equius zahhak, mituna captor

MAGE

one who knows their aspect or knows with their aspect

examples: sollux captor, meulin leijon

SEER

one who invites knowledge of their aspect or invites knowledge with their aspect. this class is canonically considered "passive"

examples: rose lalonde, terezi pyrope, kankri vantas

KNIGHT

one who exploits their aspect or exploits with their aspect

examples: dave strider, karkat vantas, latula pyrope

PAGE

one who invites exploitation of or invites exploitation through their aspect

examples: jake english, tavros nitram, horuss zahhak

THIEF

one who steals their aspect or steals with their aspect. this class is canonically considered "active"

examples: vriska serket, meenah peixes

ROGUE

one who steals their aspect or steals with their aspect, and gives it to others. this class is canonically considered "passive"

examples: roxy lalonde, nepeta leijon, rufioh nitram

MAID

one who creates their aspect or creates with their aspect

examples: jane crocker, aradia megido, porrim maryam

SYLPH

one who heals their aspect or heals through their aspect

examples: kanaya maryam, aranea serket

PRINCE

one who destroys their aspect or destroys with their aspect. this class is canonically considered "active"

examples: dirk strider, eridan ampora, kurloz makara

BARD

one who invites destruction their aspect or invites destruction with their aspect. this class is canonically considered "passive"

examples: gamzee makara, cronus ampora

[red-elric]

ohhh finally figured out my preferred aspect pairs :) (adding this afrer finishing the post: THIS GOT LONG SORRY LOL)

UNIVERSE: space/time. space includes everything, all matter and beings and potential in a chaotic, disorderly mess; time provides a dimension of order and routine to make space meaningful. together they create the fabric of the universe, the backdrop to existence

COMMUNITY: blood/breath. blood includes all bonds between persons, all relationships and connections that establish community; breath provides the individuality and necessary disconnects to ensure the community is comprised of distinct individuals. together they create society, rights, individuality, relationships

SELF: heart/life. heart includes the soul, the intangible essence of what makes a person themselves, including all potential choices they could make and lives they could live; life provides the physical form through which the soul interacts with the world, the body that defines who they become. together they create people, lives, alternate selves

EMOTION: rage/hope. rage includes a wide range of emotion, created through complacency, such as anger, disatisfaction, depression, anything resulting from the inability to see a way forward; hope provides that path forward through trust, courage, high spirits. together they create the emotional range of people, the reactions that guide them

FATE: mind/doom. mind includes all possible choices and actions, all potential timelines and alternatives that people can choose between; doom provides the inevitable fate of what will come to pass due to the immutable laws of the universe and alpha timeline, the structure for which choices will persist. together they create the distinct paths and alternate timelines through which people can travel

FORTUNE: void/light. void includes the nothingness that is the majority of the universe, the high probability that things will happen randomly without regard for good or bad; light provides the small, undeniable chance that the most fortuitous outcome will occur, the goldilocks planet in the vast expanse of space, the lucky break that seems too good to be true. together they create probability, potential, the ineffable random chance on which many things still rely

btw I framed these pairs very specifically to further split them into two broader categories; chaos (what would exist without interference) and order (the interference that makes existence meaningful). the aspects split as follows:

CHAOS: space, blood, heart, rage, mind, void

ORDER: time, breath, life, hope, doom, light

connections can be drawn between chaos aspects and order aspects (and, in fact, they often are). you can also divide the aspects further into reality (the backdrop on which people live and interact with one another) and inhabitants (the people who live and interact with one another on the backdrop of reality), which draws a few more distinct connections. the split is as follows:

REALITY: space/time, mind/doom, void/light

INHABITANTS: blood/breath, heart/life, rage/hope

and in this division, we can see some pretty clear parallels in terms of relative scale, for three subcategories: everything (everywhere, all at once), alternatives (clearly defined options to choose from), singularity (highly specific, in the moment chance). these divisions are as follows:

EVERYTHING: space/time, blood/breath

ALTERNATIVES: mind/doom, heart/life

SINGULARITY: void/light, rage/hope

this is it for me tbh. ive ordered the aspects in a way that makes sense to me; they all fuckin tie together. theyre split into pairs that cannot exist without the other, while still maintaining the connections to other parallel aspects that you cant really ignore. and man.... each aspect has two others completely disconnected from it and check this out

space: life, hope

time: heart, rage

blood: doom, light

breath: mind, void

mind: breath, hope

doom: blood, rage

heart: time, light

life: space, void

void: breath, life

light: blood, heart

rage: time, doom

hope: space, mind

doesnt work for all of them but hey. a lot of those aspect groups are ones that belong to kids with pretty notable relationships. something there about the aspects drawing in energy they dont have...... idk ill stop lol. but the point is I get aspects now!!!

[ifidieinacage]

anything is better than those prospit pajamas.

[sparky-sideblog]

Some robo things I've forgotten to share here recently - including heir of heart Hal and knight of heart Brobot AND exclusive catboy Hal.

[tavtiers]

A hypothetical god tier for Angel from Buffy the Vampire Slayer: the Maid of Doom.

A Maid of Doom is among those who alter energy to influence. They are motivated by themselves to assist caution. (x) The Maid of Doom feels like something is holding them back and hates confrontation. (x) They are the Escapee Defender, defined by freedom and caution. (x) Their opposite is the Sylph of Life. Their inverse is the Bard of Life. They share their personality with the Knight of Breath. The Maid of Doom would quest on a planet similar to the Land of Underground and Doom, reigned over by Hades (God of the Underworld) or Persephone (Dual Goddess of Spring Growth and Decay). They would rise to ascension on the wings of locusts. (x)(x)(x)

[cynical-amphisbaenia]

Classpect for Akemi Homura/Kaname Madoka? I feel like Homura's a Time player given the whole time loop thing but I'm not so sure

Homura appears to be a Knight of Time. Although her servitude is to a particular person rather than Time itself, she uses Time to achieve it through her abilities to stop it and go back in time. She wants to protect Madoka from death, but also uses Time via using destructive weapons. Although at first she doesn’t have the typical Knight mask, she does eventually form one as her cold exterior makes people think she doesn’t care about others.

Madoka appears to be a Sylph of Doom. Like many Sylphs, she enjoys helping others but ignores Doom, specifically suffering, in her own life. She also sometimes struggles to act, which can be an issue for Sylphs. When she turns into a witch, she creates Doom by destroying life. Yet she also ends up using Doom to save the world - she creates a specific rule to apply to reality. As a goddess she also heals corruption in soul gems. 

[antediluvianapocalypse]

Diavolo is a prince of light, not a sylph or lord of void as i previously speculated.

- most obviously, he is obsessed with erasing his past (prince of light = destroyer of knowledge).

- Void players are okay with being irrelevant; light players are not. diavolo falls into the latter category. his insistence that “fate chose him” is another point towards him being a light player. if fate chose him, he must be special/relevant/important.

- void says there is no answer. light says there is one answer. and, well:

- “never [arriving] at the truth” is the worst possible fate for a light player, cementing the death loop as the ultimate punishment for him.

[rigormortisorwhatever]

tag urself inverse pair edition

[magespuddle]

(updated) The Classes comparison while Classpecting (part 1: the general list of traits, Witch, Thief, Knight, Prince, Heir, Sylph)

*this post is a translation of my work on VK. Other translations will be tagged appropriately*

It has been a long time since one particular Mage of Blood has promised to make a comparison post for Classes, but what else to do on a quarantine? So here we are. I am going to compare those roles which cause the most confusion and mistakes during "on the field" Classpecting, since otherwise the post would be enomorous. Thus if you want to know more about differences, not mentioned here, you can send me an ask, so that I add the info you needed.

First of all, I should list all the points of comparison I will be using, so that no one gets confused in the terminology here. But there is an important detail: despite Classes being divided into groups under these points, each of the groups is actually a spectrum of traits for different archetypes. For instance, there is one called "Dependant Classes" (explained further in the post). It contains six Classes, while each of them have a different level of dependance, from the lowest to the highest. It is still comfortable to place them into one group or the other, but we should always remember that subtle traits make Classes uneven despite being under the same label. 

Аlmost all of Classes' traits can be used as branching points for comparison, some of them can be derived from the graph below.

The full list of traits and explanation goes like this:

1. Dependance-Independance — how strong the need in allies is for the Class to perform its function.

2. Activity-Passivity — these terms are quite well-known, but they actually include a vast variety of traits, which are often different for the same Class under the label of "passive" or "active". Therefore, I've cut it into distinctive parts; in the context of our current subject this trait determines whether the Class performs its function directly, is the deliver of the action (active), or indirectly, through other person's hands (passive). For example, the active Prince destroys the Aspect or via Aspect, causing the damage with his own hands, while the passive Bard is more like a catalizator and an initiator for others to break the Aspect.

3. Action-Interaction — can be mistaken with Dependance ones, but these determine whether the Class is occupied with influencing the environment or the people around him accirdingly. Corresponds with A, I and E, S Bartle's types (explained further).

4. Deficiency-Abundance of the Aspect — kind of a vague characteristic, since the topic of Aspect amount in the family system and individually is quite complicated, won't fit into this post for sure... Well, to put Deficiency-Abundance simply, it determines whether the Class is "hungry" for the Aspect and willing to put his hands on it or completely full and willing to share accordingly. 

5. Practice-Theory — practical Classes are more intuitive and prefer to act and improvise over planning first, they are better at working with their Aspect, than understanding how it works; theoretical Classes are the opposite: they absolutely have to understand how the Aspect works, but not necessarily be good at using it. Most practical Classes are Deficiency ones, theoretical - Abundance ones.

6. Basic skillness in the Aspect — I am using the word "basic", because, as I've previously stated, everything exists on a spectrum as well as many things are dynamic and changeable. The skillness in any sphere changes with time, but many people are used to think that, for example, the Knight is skilled in the Aspect, while the Bard isn't, which is not always true, though this point is still needed for the differentiation.

7. Class type — all Classes can be divided into the ones who distort, change the Aspect in any way, affect its shape (the Changing group: the Prince, the Bard, the Knight, the Page, the Witch and the Heir) and the ones who do the opposite with keeping the Aspect as it is, multiplying it, sharing it around (the Saving group: the Maid, the Sylph, the Thief, the Rogue, the Mage and the Seer). To not mistake the Changing type for the shared function of the Witch and the Heir, I will be referring to the latter as Manipulators in this post.

8. System function — can be mistaken with the individual Class function. The system function determines the overall solo effect of the Class on the Aspect balance in the session (system), which is based not so much on the personal skills as on the amount of the Aspect in the system and in the Class we are talking about, on the relationship of the Class with his Aspect. System function goes like this:

Classes that increase the Aspect greatly: Creating Classes (the Maid and the Sylph), the Page

Classes that increase the Aspect slightly: the Muse (only if we are talking about solo impact!), the Heir, the Seer, the Knight

Classes that decrease the Aspect slightly: the Lord (solo), the Mage, the Witch (changing the part of the Aspect limits the ways it can express itself), the Rogue (via dispersing it around)

Classes that decrease the Aspect greatly: Destroying Classes (the Bard and the Prince), the Thief (via concentrating it on himself)

I need to mention that despite me writing about Muses and Lords here, people in average circumstances do not take up these roles and are not born with them as titles. It is a whole another topic, too big for this post anyway.

9. Egoism (labelled egocentrism on the graph) — how much the Class prioritizes his own well-being over other people's ones. Does not always correlate with the over-the-top self-esteem.

10. The Bartle's player type — the Bartle's Classification describes four types of game players based on their relationship with other players and gaming environment. For the Classes these types are used in pairs for each Class, primary type and secondary. I won't be giving the in-depth explanation of each type, since they can be found online, only the combos for the Classes as following:

Strategists (S): SS (the Muse), SE (the Bard), SI (the Sylph), SA (the Seer)

Effectors (E): ES (the Prince), EI (the Maid), EA (the Knight)

Innovators (I): IS (the Mage), IE (the Rogue), IA (the Page)

Aces (A): AS (the Witch), AE (the Thief), AI (the Heir), АА (the Lord)

11. Overall weight of the Aspect — a number, signifying the sum of the Aspect already on Class'es hands and the Aspect he can get his hands on potentially. It describes "the weight" of Classes and the shift of the balance in Aspect pairs among inversion pairs, which in its turn influences the subjective heavyness of the role as well as the final Master Class of the person. In addition, this plays a role in the collections of roles one posesses in their Classpect profile as there are distinct formulas for the Classes' combos within related Aspects (topic for another day, though). For the inversion pairs the numbers are:

2:0 = Prince:Sylph, Bard:Maid, Mage:Heir

1:1 = Witch:Seer, Knight:Rogue, Thief:Page

12. Class category — the good-old function pairs (Relocators, Destroyers, Creators, etc.).

13. Relationship with the Aspect — some Classes coexist happily with the Aspect and it likes them back (harmonious Classes), while others don't like it that much and it returns the favor (disharmonious ones). If we make a spectrum of harmony, it would go like this:

Harmony <- +3 (Maids and Sylphs), +2 (Knights and Thieves), +1 (Heirs ans Seers); Muse

Disharmony -> -1 (Mages and Witches), -2 (Rogues and Pages), -3 (Bards and Princes); Lord

14. Inversion — some roles are impossible to differentiate without looking at their inverses. The inverse of the role is created by taking the opposite by function Class to the one you are starting with and another Aspect paired with the starting one to combine them into an inverse role. For example: the Prince of Void, the opposite Class would be Sylph and the Aspect - Light; this gives us an inversion of the Sylph of Light.

Inversion pairs for the Classes: Maid-Bard, Thief-Page, Mage-Heir, Witch-Seer, Knight-Rogue, Prince-Sylph; Muse and Lord are more analogous, than inverted.

!UPDATE STARTS!

15. Aspect source — this has stuff to do with the family system, inheritance, Activity/Passivity, but to put it simply: it is where the Class finds the Aspect to perform its function on/with. The Aspect may come from the family system of the individual (Internal) or from the people around them (External). The divide goes like this:

Internal source: Sylph, Seer, Bard, Page, Knight, Heir

External source: Maid, Mage, Prince, Thief, Rogue, Mage

!UPDATE ENDS!

So finally let's dive in the comparisons themselves. *You have no idea, how painful it is for me to rewrite the whole post after the device shut down without saving my almost done project. Anyway…* I will be highlighting only the key differences since some Classes are so far apart, that is is too hard to mix them up. 

1. Thief-Witch-Heir

Shared: all Classes are Independant, Action-oriented, Deficient, they posess the qualities of the Ace. The Heir and the Witch get mixed beacuse of thw difficulties in defining Activity, the Thief and the Heir — because of the Hunger for the Aspect, the Witch and the Thief — because of the Egoism.

Different: contrary to the Thief and the Witch, the Heir is a more Independant, Egoistic Passive Class, that Slightly increases the Aspect. What is more, he has lesser Overall weight, because the Heir doesn't attract the Aspect as much as the Thief and the Witch is more Abundant. In addition, this Class posesses the qualities of the Innovator. Unlike the Strategist Witch, the Heir is Harmonious with his own Aspect and Disharmonious with the inverted one. Apart from the Thief, there is no "hardest, fastest, strongest of them all" logic for Heirs in the Aspect. Not to mention, that overall the Heir is softer to the people around. He is just minding his own thing, without meddling with others.

Contrary to the Witch, the Thief is a more Basically skilled, Saving type Relocation Class, that Greatly decreases the Aspect. He is Harmonious with his own Aspect and Disharmonious with the inverted one (but usually nonetheless he is positive towards both), posesses the qualities of the Effector. In addition, the Witch is quite unpredictable and tries to bend the Aspect to her rules when she finds something she doesn't like.

Unlike the both Heir and Witch, the Thief has a remarkable Hunger for the Aspect, is impulsive. While the first two feel and behave as part of the group and care for others (the Heir is overall friendly, the Witch has a soft spot for a close circle of friends), the last one is self-centered and drops the team as soon as there is nothing for him to get. What is more, the Relocation takes the full transporting of the Aspect from one object/place to another, while the Manipulation needs at least one object and the Aspect isn't erased completely.

2. Thief-Knight-Sylph

Shared: all Classes are highly Basically skilled and Harmonious with their own Aspect. They get mixed up because of the perfectionism, that stems from different reasons for each Class.

Different: contrary to the Thief and the Sylph, the Knight is a Changing type Yielding Class. He is less Egoistic and his Overall weight is smaller, because of the lack of the Aspect attraction. His perfectionism is the result of the low self-confidence and high demands and standards he has set himself. The Knight is very good in the Aspect, not for the glory of being known as "the best", but to justify this in his own eyes. Therefore, he is not bragging about his achievements, quite the opposite — he is constantly loathing his excellent job, thinking of it as something hideous and "not good enough". Though likely you won't hear this from the Knight, since keeping his facade of competence is very important to him. In addition, they usually care specifically for the close circle of friends and do not play saviours with the random people just for the sake of it. Unlike the Thief, the Knight is more Disharmonious with the inverted Aspect, because the Rogues are not as compliant with their element as the Pages.

Contrary to the Knight, the Sylph is a Passive, Interaction-oriented, Abundant, Strategist-Innovator Creator Class. His system function is Greatly increasing the Aspect. He is waaaaaaay more Disharmonious with the inverted Aspect, while in the own Aspect the Sylph is not as much a perfectionist as an appreciation seeker. Thus the Sylph is going to meddle even with the unfamiliar people and show off his skills so that everyone would know how useful and precious he is. Alas, once the appreciation has been got, the mastering of the Aspect skills is no longer a goal for the Sylph. What for, anyway? Usually Sylphs are absolutely confident in their competence and they are not afraid to rub it in your face.

Unlike the Sylph, the Thief is a more Independant, Action-oriented, Deficient, Active Relocation Ace-Effector Class, that Greatly decreases the Aspect. He is less Disharmonious with his inverted Aspect and is more objective while bragging about his own Aspect achievements. The level of skillness is less valuable to the Thief than the quantity of the Aspect on hand. It is kind of like "the bigger — the better" logic. And as has been stated above, he is not as altruistic.

3. Witch-Knight-Prince

Shared: all Classes are Active, Deficient, Changing type. The Knight is here, because Witches and realized Princes often get Classpected as such (but only developed and realized Princes: Classpecting a decompensated Prince as a Knight is, well… not very well; you'll understand why).

Different: contrary to the Witch and the Prince, the Knight is more Basically skilled in the Aspect and the least Egoistic from the three. He is Slightly increasing the Aspect and is Harmonious in his own one, though more Deficient, while Disharmonious with the inverted one. What is more, unlike the Prince, this Class posesses the qualities of the Ace. Apart from the Witch, the Knight is usually more "noble", lawful and disciplined, while the latter is rebellious and flexible.

Compared to the Witch, the Prince is a more Egoistic, Dependant, Interaction-oriented, less Basically skilled Destroyer Class, that Greatly decreases the Aspect. He posesses the qualities of the Effector. While the Witch is prone to drop her playthings half the way to the goal and move onto another stuff, the Prince finishes the job due to the Sylph inverse. Unlike the Knight and the Witch, the Prince influences broad masses of people and doesn't limit himself with a tiny circle of friends. He is very Disharmonious with his own Aspect, sometimes even hateful towards it.

Contrary to the Knight and the Prince, the Witch is a more Independant, average in Basic skillness and Egoism Manipulator Class. Both the Prince and the Knight have a lower self-esteem and a higher perfectionism, than her, but the first one overcompensates with Egocentrism and the second one is convinced he is a loser in his Aspect despite all the evidence of the opposite. All in all, bragging and manipulating are more prominent in Princes and Witches.

4. Witch-Sylph

Shared: both Classes are average in Egoism, posess the qualities of the Strategists.

Different: the main problem comes from the difficulty of understanding the Creation and the Manipulation functions. The only difference is that the Witch needs to have access to the source of the Aspect to both make it stronger or weaker, while the Sylph can get the Aspect seemingly from the thin air, but afterwards can't put it away. In addition to that, unlike the Sylph, the Witch is a more Independant, Action-oriented, Changing type, Deficient Active Class and is more likely to leave her "toys", while the Sylph sticks like glue, is an Interaction-oriented, Saving type, Abundant, filled to the brim with the Aspect, Passive Class. The Witch has a lower Basic skillness, but just because it is measured among other Practical Classes, while the Sylph is a highly Basically skilled Theoretic. The system function of the first one is Slightly decreasing the Aspect and is more interested in mastering her skills (qualities of the Ace), has a higher self-esteem, whether the second one Greatly increases it and seeks social appreciation (qualities of the Strategist), has a lower self-esteem that is overcompensated to the size of arrogance. What is also important, the Witch is Disharmonious with the own Aspect and Harmonious with the inverted one, while the Sylph loves his own Aspect and hates the inverted one.

Part 2