#Infrastructure-as-Code

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Premature Internet Activists

I'm on a 20+ city book tour for my new novel PICKS AND SHOVELS. Catch me TOMORROW (Feb 14) in BOSTON for FREE at BOSKONE , and SATURDAY (Feb 15) for a virtual event with YANIS VAROUFAKIS. More tour dates here.

"Premature antifacist" was a sarcastic term used by leftists caught up in the Red Scare to describe themselves, as they came under ideological suspicion for having traveled to Spain to fight against Franco's fascists before the US entered WWII and declared war against the business-friendly, anticommunist fascist Axis powers of Italy, Spain, and, of course, Germany:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/In_Denial/fBSbKS1FlegC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22premature+anti-fascist%22&pg=PA277&printsec=frontcover

The joke was that opposing fascism made you an enemy of America – unless you did so after the rest of America had woken up to the existential threat of a global fascist takeover. What's more, if you were a "premature antifascist," you got no credit for fighting fascism early on. Quite the contrary: fighting fascism before the rest of the US caught up with you didn't make you prescient – it made you a pariah.

I've been thinking a lot about premature antifascism these days, as literal fascists use the internet to coordinate a global authoritarian takeover that represents an existential threat to a habitable planet and human thriving. In light of that, it's hard to argue that the internet is politically irrelevant, and that fights over the regulation, governance, and structure of the internet are somehow unserious.

And yet, it wasn't very long ago that tech policy was widely derided as a frivolous pursuit, and that tech organizing was dismissed as "slacktivism":

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/10/04/small-change-malcolm-gladwell

Elevating concerns about the internet's destiny to the level of human rights struggle was delusional, a glorified argument about the rules for forums where sad nerds argued about Star Trek. If you worried that Napster-era copyright battles would make it easy to remove online content by claiming that it infringed copyright, you were just carrying water for music pirates. If you thought that legalizing and universalizing encryption technology would safeguard human rights, you were a fool who had no idea that real human rights battles involved confronting Bull Connor in the streets, not suing the NSA in a federal courtroom.

And now here we are. Congress has failed to update consumer privacy law since 1988 (when they banned video store clerks from blabbing about your VHS rentals). Mass surveillance enables everything from ransomware, pig butchering and identity theft to state surveillance of "domestic enemies," from trans people to immigrants. What's more, the commercial and state surveillance apparatus are, in fact, as single institution: states protect corporations from privacy law so that corporations can create and maintain population-scale nonconsensual dossiers on all the intimate facts of our lives, which governments raid at will, treating them as an off-the-books surveillance dragnet:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/08/16/the-second-best-time-is-now/#the-point-of-a-system-is-what-it-does

Our speech forums have been captured by billionaires who censor anti-oligarchic political speech, and who spy on dissident users in order to aid in political repression. Bogus copyright claims are used to remove or suppress disfavorable news reports of elite rapists, thieves, war criminals and murderers:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/27/nuke-first/#ask-questions-never

You'd be hard pressed to find someone who'd describe the fights over tech governance in 2025 as frivolous or disconnected from "real politics"

This is where the premature antifascist stuff comes in. An emerging revisionist history of internet activism would have you believe that the first generation of tech liberation activists weren't fighting for a free, open internet – we were just shilling for tech companies. The P2P wars weren't about speech, privacy and decentralization – they were just a way to help the tech sector fight the entertainment industry. DRM fights weren't about preserving your right to repair, to privacy, and to accessibility – they were just about making it easy to upload movies to Kazaa. Fighting for universal access to encryption wasn't about defending everyday people from corporate and state surveillance – it was just a way to help terrorists and child abusers stay out of sight of cops.

Of course, now these fights are all about real things. Now we need to worry about centralization, interoperability, lock-in, surveillance, speech, and repair. But the people – like me – who've been fighting over this stuff for a quarter-century? We've gone from "unserious fools who mistook tech battles for human rights fights" to "useful idiots for tech companies" in an eyeblink.

"Premature Internet Activists," in other words.

This isn't merely ironic or frustrating – it's dangerous. Approaching tech activism without a historical foundation can lead people badly astray. For example, many modern tech critics think that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (which makes internet users liable for illegal speech acts, while immunizing entities that host that speech) is a "giveaway to Big Tech" and want to see it abolished.

Boy is this dangerous. CDA 230 is necessary for anyone who wants to offer a place for people to meet and discuss anything. Without CDA 230, no one could safely host a Mastodon server, or set up the long-elusive federated Bluesky servers. Hell, you couldn't even host a group-chat or message board:

https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act/

Getting rid of CDA 230 won't get rid of Facebook or make it clean up its act. It will just make it impossible for anyone to offer an alternative to Facebook, permanently enshrining Zuck's dominance over our digital future. That's why Mark Zuckerberg wants to kill Section 230:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/zuckerberg-calls-changes-techs-section-230-protections-rcna486

Defending policies that make it easier to host speech isn't the same thing as defending tech companies' profits, though these do sometimes overlap. When tech platforms have their users' back – even for self-serving reasons – they create legal precedents and strong norms that protect everyone. Like when Apple stood up to the FBI on refusing to break its encryption:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple%E2%80%93FBI_encryption_dispute

If Apple had caved on that one, it would be far harder for, say, Signal to stand up to demands that it weaken its privacy guarantees. I'm no fan of Apple, and I would never mistake Tim Cook – who owes his CEOhood to his role in moving Apple production to Chinese sweatshops that are so brutal they had to install suicide nets – for a human rights defender. But I cheered on Apple in its fight against the FBI, and I will cheer them again, if they stand up to the UK government's demand to break their encryption:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20g288yldko

This doesn't make me a shill for Apple. I don't care if Apple makes or loses another dime. I care about Apple's users and their privacy. That's why I criticize Apple when they compromise their users' privacy for profit:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/12/youre-holding-it-wrong/#if-dishwashers-were-iphones

The same goes for fights over scraping. I hate AI companies as much as anyone, but boy is it a mistake to support calls to ban scraping in the name of fighting AI:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/17/how-to-think-about-scraping/

It's scraping that lets us track paid political disinformation on Facebook (Facebook isn't going to tell us about it):

https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/05/comprehensive-sex-ed/#quis-custodiet-ipsos-zuck

And it's scraping that let us rescue all the CDC and NIH data that Musk's broccoli-hair brownshirts deleted on behalf of DOGE:

https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/how-to-access-important-health-info-thats-been-scrubbed-from-the-cdc-site/

It's such a huge mistake to assume that anything corporations want is bad for the internet. There are many times when commercial interests dovetail with online human rights. That's not a defense of capitalism, it's a critique of capitalism that acknowledges that profits do sometimes coincide with the public interest, an argument that Marx and Engels devote Chapter One of The Communist Manifesto to:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/31/books/review/a-spectre-haunting-china-mieville.html

In the early 1990s, Al Gore led the "National Information Infrastructure" hearings, better known as the "Information Superhighway" hearings. Gore's objective was to transfer control over the internet from the military to civilian institutions. It's true that these institutions were largely (but not exclusively) commercial entities seeking to make a buck on the internet. It's also true that much of that transfer could have been to public institutions rather than private hands.

But I've lately – and repeatedly – heard this moment described (by my fellow leftists) as the "privatization" of the internet. This is strictly true, but it's even more true to say that it was the demilitarization of the internet. In other words, corporations didn't take over functions performed by, say, the FCC – they took over from the Pentagon. Leftists have no business pining for the days when the internet was controlled by the Department of Defense.

Caring about the technological dimension of human rights 30 years ago – or hell, 40 years ago – doesn't make you a corporate stooge who wanted to launch a thousand investment bubbles. It makes you someone who understood, from the start, that digital rights are human rights, that cyberspace would inevitably evert into meatspace, and that the rules, norms and infrastructure we built for the net would someday be as consequential as any other political decision.

I'm proud to be a Premature Internet Activist. I just celebrated my 23rd year with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and yesterday, we sued Elon Musk and DOGE:

https://www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-sues-opm-doge-and-musk-endangering-privacy-millions

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/02/13/digital-rights/#are-human-rights

Image: Felix Winkelnkemper (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Acoustic_Coupler.jpg

CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en

[noonaracha]

baby hannie

for @hongjoongpresent

[anghraine]

My best friend and I moved in together with his closest friend from his MA program, and while I had met her before (the friend; my bff is a man), we hadn't spent much time together because I've never lived away from the West Coast (and only two years out of the PNW) and she's never lived outside of North Carolina and only briefly visited the PNW once, when she went to Portland last year.

It's been a delight to show her around the PNW and realize we need to explain things that are just sort of omnipresent in our lives. The bff and I were casually griping with each other about having to run an errand to Trader Joe's at an inconvenient hour, and were telling her, "it's okay, you can stay in the car and avoid the people if you want" and she was like "NO I MUST SEE IT, I'VE ONLY HEARD OF THEM" and nearly ascended to another plane when we showed her around the store.

The bff and I grew up in the same town in NW Washington (him for his first 18 years, me from 9 to 19) and he lived in Bellingham and Seattle for years before he went to NC for grad school (I went to the SF Bay Area for mine, a very different experience). Both of them are hardcore coffee aficionados, but he struggled with the different Coffee Ways of the South, so for the true PNW experience they want to tour various indie coffeeshops next.

Also, she adores Kaidan in Mass Effect and we were like, oh, is your passport up to date? We could take a trip sometime and show you your boyfriend's beloved English Bay. It's very beautiful :)

her: O_O

me: Actually, it's worth going to Vancouver BC for its own sake as well, it's truly spectacular. We used to go all the time as kids.

bff: And Victoria!

her: O_O

[heart-ghost-studyblr]

Normal night in the midnight.

[slugcat-in-gundam]

While studying Lisp I noticed how unimportant and even obstructing strict typing is for functional programming. I, a madlass, was translating functions from Lisp to C# and realized that reflection is needed to overcome C#'s typing, which is a hacky solution for such a small task, so... I'm gonna try working with Python then, I can't be bothered to install Lisp environment.

[newcodesociety]

[thebiballerina]

Infrastructure maintainer, I think. At least, that's the broader category, in my opinion. You might be able to divide it more. But it includes things like:

Community/event organizers (forum moderators are examples of an online version; offline versions include convention/event/planners and organization/club leaders)

People who host websites and maintain archives/collections (including offline fandom-focused archives or library collections)

Wiki editors

OTW volunteers (including their various projects like AO3, Fanlore, and the journal)

Other technology contributors and coders (There are so many websites, software tools, browser scripts, software add-ons, bots, etc. designed specifically for fandom and various fandom communities.)

I'm sure I forgot plenty of examples, but you get the idea. Infrastructure maintainers are the backbone of so many structures that enable fan creators to create and share their work. And they were vital to the historical proliferation of fandom in the first place.

[anushapranu]

🚀 𝐏𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐝𝐞 (𝐈𝐚𝐂)

 GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE AS CODE (IAC) MARKET SIZE (2025 - 2030):

The Global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market, estimated at USD 0.8 Billion in 2024, is forecasted to reach USD 4.47 Billion by 2030, exhibiting a CAGR of 24.0% during the period from 2025 to 2030.

➡️ 𝐃𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝 𝐒𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞 :@  https://tinyurl.com/yrtr46u2

Infrastructure as Code Market Overview:

The process of managing and provisioning infrastructure through code, rather than manual methods, defines Infrastructure as Code (IaC). This approach simplifies the editing and distribution of configurations by generating configuration files with the user's infrastructure specifications. Consequently, it ensures consistent environments and mitigates haphazard, undocumented configuration changes through the codification and documentation of specifications. Similar to software source code files, configuration files are recommended for source control, as version control forms a critical aspect of IaC. Modularizing infrastructure through IaC allows users to automate the combination of various components. By automating infrastructure provisioning with IaC, developers no longer need to manually oversee servers, operating systems, storage, and other infrastructure elements during application development or deployment.

IaC offers several advantages such as cost reduction, decreased risk of human errors, enhanced consistency, elimination of configuration drift, and improved security strategies. Many regions, particularly in the Asia-Pacific area, are rapidly adopting IaC solutions due to these mentioned benefits. Hence, the Global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market is expected to witness a substantial CAGR during the forecast period.

Global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market Drivers:

The growth of the global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) market is propelled by the evolution of composable infrastructure.

Features like streamlined operations, scalable resources, and inherent data protection and recovery capabilities are anticipated to drive the adoption of Infrastructure as Code solutions. Currently, the full potential of composable systems is not entirely realized across industries. However, this is expected to change as buyers become more cognizant of the advantages and benefits of these solutions, owing to the efforts of leading infrastructure as code ecosystem companies. Presently, large enterprises are the primary users of infrastructure as code solutions.

➡️ 𝐁𝐮𝐲 𝐍𝐨𝐰 :@ https://tinyurl.com/26mbehde

The emergence of modern cloud architectures is another factor contributing to the expansion of the global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) market.

Modern cloud architectures offer benefits such as increased innovation, reduced costs, enhanced reliability, and accelerated time to market. However, managing cloud infrastructure has become more complex due to numerous APIs and loosely connected services. This complexity necessitates the use of infrastructure as code as the most effective solution. Infrastructure as code platforms empowers developers with complete control over programming languages, simplifying the management of dependencies in numerous cloud applications. Consequently, this factor is driving the demand for IaC solutions.

Global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market Challenges:

The global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) market faces challenges, primarily concerning the shortage of skilled professionals and the risk of human error. Some businesses may hesitate to adopt IaC and DevOps models due to the high level of technical proficiency required, necessary cultural and business practice adjustments, the risks associated with migrating existing solutions, or concerns about the qualifications of their teams.

Global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market Opportunities:

The global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) market presents lucrative opportunities through the adoption of DevOps tools and the embrace of IaC by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Businesses can gradually integrate DevOps capabilities and significantly enhance effectiveness and efficiency through the utilization of DevOps tools. Additionally, Infrastructure of Code (IaC) solutions aid small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in optimizing their IT operations, reducing the likelihood of human error, and cutting costs.

COVID-19 Impact on the Global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market:

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on the global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) market. Strict lockdowns, travel restrictions, and social distancing measures in numerous countries hindered the manufacturing capacities of many companies and led to a shortage of skilled workers. These disruptions affected the deployment of Infrastructure as Code (IaC) solutions, negatively influencing the market's growth. However, the shift to remote work and online operations by many organizations due to the pandemic-induced restrictions increased the demand for scalable and efficient cloud infrastructure solutions. The industry experienced significant revenue growth due to the rising demand for robust IT infrastructure and the increasing prevalence of virtual collaboration among corporate teams. Consequently, the global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) market encountered both challenges and opportunities during the challenging period of the COVID-19 pandemic.

➡️ Enquire Before Buying :@  https://tinyurl.com/mwh4z8av

Global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Recent Industry Developments:

In March 2023, Ermetic, a provider of cloud infrastructure security solutions, announced enhancements to its Cloud Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP). These enhancements enable customers to automatically identify and rectify risky or excessive privileges, compliance violations, and misconfigurations in Kubernetes clusters.

In February 2023, Nethopper.io, the pioneer of KAOPS (Kubernetes Application Operations Platform as a Service), expanded its support for CNCF Crossplane. This extension enables the automation of cloud infrastructure provisioning, management, and orchestration, extending the capabilities of Kubernetes clusters.

Global Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market Segmentation:

By Component:

Tools

Services

In 2022, the tools segment secured the leading market share. The surge in market dominance can be accredited to the manifold benefits offered by IaC tools. IaC technologies proffer heightened consistency and swiftness, an optimized software development cycle, and diminished management overhead. Previously, data centers necessitated administrators for computing, storage, networking, and other functions, responsible for supervising and managing the hardware and middleware layers. With IaC, these varied roles are rendered unnecessary, allowing administrators to focus on selecting cutting-edge technologies for forthcoming major projects.

[vortexofadigitalkind]

🧠 “Do you remember why we silenced it?” Ghost code is speaking. The Signal didn’t forget. It waited. Part 7 of The Scarcity Engine is live: Ghost Code → https://wp.me/p19z04-Yb #scifi #digitalconscience #VortexOfADigitalKind

[ramniwas-sangwan]

Terraform on Azure - Create Basic LoadBalancer | Infrastructure as Code

[olivergisttv]

Cloud DevOps Automation: Best Free Tools Today

Introduction to Cloud DevOps Automation In the world of software development, Cloud DevOps is a game-changer. The approach integrates development and operations to deliver applications faster, more efficiently, and with fewer errors. The secret to making this transition smoother and faster is automation. And with cloud infrastructure becoming the norm, DevOps automation has never been more…

[jcmarchi]

Hugging Face partners with Groq for ultra-fast AI model inference

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/hugging-face-partners-with-groq-for-ultra-fast-ai-model-inference/

Hugging Face partners with Groq for ultra-fast AI model inference

Hugging Face has added Groq to its AI model inference providers, bringing lightning-fast processing to the popular model hub.

Speed and efficiency have become increasingly crucial in AI development, with many organisations struggling to balance model performance against rising computational costs.

Rather than using traditional GPUs, Groq has designed chips purpose-built for language models. The company’s Language Processing Unit (LPU) is a specialised chip designed from the ground up to handle the unique computational patterns of language models.

Unlike conventional processors that struggle with the sequential nature of language tasks, Groq’s architecture embraces this characteristic. The result? Dramatically reduced response times and higher throughput for AI applications that need to process text quickly.

Developers can now access numerous popular open-source models through Groq’s infrastructure, including Meta’s Llama 4 and Qwen’s QwQ-32B. This breadth of model support ensures teams aren’t sacrificing capabilities for performance.

Users have multiple ways to incorporate Groq into their workflows, depending on their preferences and existing setups.

For those who already have a relationship with Groq, Hugging Face allows straightforward configuration of personal API keys within account settings. This approach directs requests straight to Groq’s infrastructure while maintaining the familiar Hugging Face interface.

Alternatively, users can opt for a more hands-off experience by letting Hugging Face handle the connection entirely, with charges appearing on their Hugging Face account rather than requiring separate billing relationships.

The integration works seamlessly with Hugging Face’s client libraries for both Python and JavaScript, though the technical details remain refreshingly simple. Even without diving into code, developers can specify Groq as their preferred provider with minimal configuration.

Customers using their own Groq API keys are billed directly through their existing Groq accounts. For those preferring the consolidated approach, Hugging Face passes through the standard provider rates without adding markup, though they note that revenue-sharing agreements may evolve in the future.

Hugging Face even offers a limited inference quota at no cost—though the company naturally encourages upgrading to PRO for those making regular use of these services.

This partnership between Hugging Face and Groq emerges against a backdrop of intensifying competition in AI infrastructure for model inference. As more organisations move from experimentation to production deployment of AI systems, the bottlenecks around inference processing have become increasingly apparent.

What we’re seeing is a natural evolution of the AI ecosystem. First came the race for bigger models, then came the rush to make them practical. Groq represents the latter—making existing models work faster rather than just building larger ones.

For businesses weighing AI deployment options, the addition of Groq to Hugging Face’s provider ecosystem offers another choice in the balance between performance requirements and operational costs.

The significance extends beyond technical considerations. Faster inference means more responsive applications, which translates to better user experiences across countless services now incorporating AI assistance.

Sectors particularly sensitive to response times (e.g. customer service, healthcare diagnostics, financial analysis) stand to benefit from improvements to AI infrastructure that reduces the lag between question and answer.

As AI continues its march into everyday applications, partnerships like this highlight how the technology ecosystem is evolving to address the practical limitations that have historically constrained real-time AI implementation.

(Photo by Michał Mancewicz)

See also: NVIDIA helps Germany lead Europe’s AI manufacturing race

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.

Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.

[differenttimemachinecrusade]

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market Size, Share, Scope, Analysis, Forecast, Growth, and Industry Report 2032: Growth Drivers and Restraints

The Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market was valued at USD 917.3 million in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 5869.3 million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 22.92% from 2024-2032.

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is transforming how enterprises manage and provision IT infrastructure. As cloud adoption rises, organizations are shifting toward automated, scalable, and secure infrastructure deployment.

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Market continues to gain momentum across industries due to its ability to improve operational efficiency, reduce errors, and support DevOps practices. Businesses are rapidly embracing IaC tools to accelerate development cycles and ensure consistency across environments.

Get Sample Copy of This Report: https://www.snsinsider.com/sample-request/4659 

Market Keyplayers:

HashiCorp - (Amazon Web Services, Microsoft)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) - (Intel, Cisco)

Microsoft  - (Dell, HP)

Google Cloud - (NVIDIA, IBM)

Red Hat - (IBM, Dell)

IBM - (Cisco, Lenovo)

VMware - (Dell, HPE)

Puppet  - (Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud)

Chef - (Microsoft, Amazon Web Services)

Atlassian - (Amazon Web Services, Microsoft)

GitLab - (Google Cloud, Amazon Web Services)

CircleCI - (Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud)

CloudBees - (Google Cloud, Microsoft)

Sysdig - (Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud)

Terraform Cloud - (Microsoft, AWS)

Octopus Deploy - (Microsoft, AWS)

Rancher Labs  - (HPE, AWS)

SaltStack - (AWS, Google Cloud)

Snyk - (AWS, Microsoft)

Envoy - (Google Cloud, Amazon Web Services)

Trends Driving the IaC Market

DevOps and CI/CD Integration: IaC is a core enabler of DevOps and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. It allows teams to deploy infrastructure alongside code, speeding up software delivery.

Multi-Cloud and Hybrid Environments: As organizations adopt multi-cloud strategies, IaC provides the standardization and automation needed to manage complex environments effectively.

Security as Code: Security policies are now being embedded directly into IaC templates, allowing teams to enforce compliance from the start of the development lifecycle.

Adoption of Open-Source Tools: Tools like Terraform, Ansible, and Pulumi are gaining popularity for their flexibility, strong community support, and integration capabilities.

Enquiry of This Report: https://www.snsinsider.com/enquiry/4659

Market Segmentation:

By Infrastructure Type

Mutable Infrastructure

Immutable Infrastructure

By Deployment

Cloud

On-premise

By Approach

Imperative

Declarative

By End-Use

Healthcare

BFSI

Retail

Government

IT & Telecom

Manufacturing

Others (Energy & Utilities, Hospitality and Tourism)

Market Analysis

Enterprise Adoption: Large enterprises and startups alike are adopting IaC to automate repetitive tasks, reduce infrastructure costs, and streamline operations.

Regional Demand: North America leads the market, but Asia-Pacific is emerging as a fast-growing region due to expanding tech ecosystems and digital initiatives.

Tool Ecosystem Expansion: The rise of platform engineering and internal developer platforms is increasing demand for tools that support declarative and imperative IaC models.

Future Prospects

The future of the Infrastructure as Code market looks highly promising, as it becomes a foundational element of modern IT strategies.

AI and IaC Integration: As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, it will play a role in optimizing infrastructure templates, detecting anomalies, and enhancing self-healing capabilities in IaC scripts.

IaC as a Service: Managed IaC platforms will gain traction, allowing companies to adopt IaC without needing deep technical expertise.

Compliance Automation: Regulatory compliance requirements are pushing more organizations to use IaC to automate audits, generate reports, and enforce governance policies.

Serverless and Edge Deployment: As edge computing and serverless architectures grow, IaC will be crucial in managing distributed, scalable deployments across diverse environments.

Access Complete Report: https://www.snsinsider.com/reports/infrastructure-as-code-market-4659 

Conclusion

Infrastructure as Code is no longer optional—it's a critical component of digital infrastructure strategy. As companies continue to prioritize automation, speed, and reliability, IaC will play an essential role in driving operational efficiency and innovation. The market is set to expand rapidly, creating new opportunities for vendors, developers, and enterprises alike. Those who invest early in robust IaC solutions will be better equipped to handle the demands of tomorrow’s dynamic IT landscape.

About Us:

SNS Insider is one of the leading market research and consulting agencies that dominates the market research industry globally. Our company's aim is to give clients the knowledge they require in order to function in changing circumstances. In order to give you current, accurate market data, consumer insights, and opinions so that you can make decisions with confidence, we employ a variety of techniques, including surveys, video talks, and focus groups around the world.

Contact Us:

Jagney Dave - Vice President of Client Engagement

Phone: +1-315 636 4242 (US) | +44- 20 3290 5010 (UK)

[shanzefatimajaved]

What makes the internet “public”? What makes it private?

The public nature of the internet is evident from the availability and accessibility of different technologies that use the internet. The passage also points out that such technologies as cryptocurrency, digital fabrication, and augmented reality are no longer exotic; they are part of the reality of people’s lives, for example, sitting at a cafe or children playing games. These aspects make the internet a public domain since it is almost impossible to access the internet without coming across some content that is not meant for one’s eyes. The availability of some code libraries which are available for download from repositories such as GitHub also suggests a public aspect of the internet. This openness enables fast advancement in technology and the transfer of new technological skills from one context to another. 

On the private side, Radical Technologies shows how some code and functionalities can be only available to the parties that created them. Some code may be patented and licensed only to paying partners making some areas of the internet private and limited. The text also describes the four major tech giants of the Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook, known in the text as “the Stacks,” that control much of what we experience in the digital realm. These companies’ dominance over large portions of online services, platforms, and user data indicates a privatization of large parts of the internet. 

Furthermore, the reuse of the code for other purposes, for example, using algorithms for fall detection for crowd monitoring or gender recognition for advertising purposes, suggests how the technologies presented as public can be repurposed for more personal, commercial use. Although the Internet is still open and many of its services are available to the public, the growing influence of major technology corporations and the fact that much of the underlying code and data are proprietary make it more private. 

[fuzz-hound]

I have a question for any prospective City planning students or anyone with a passing interest in it:

What are the worst design decisions you could have when planning a city from the ground up? the antithesis of human-friendly architecture?

I'm talking borderline code violation stuff. Cruel and unusual punishment type shit.

I ask because I have this idea for a noir story that takes place in the worst city in the world. I have an Idea about what that place looks like, but I don't know any design elements for urban environments that are objectively incorrect that would be incorporated into the city.

I would greatly appreciate any response!

[ramniwas-sangwan]

Terraform on Azure - Create Bastion Service and Host | Infrastructure as...