#Interview GPT

[skeilig]

people keep publicly confessing that they've fallen in love with AI chatbots and i'm going insane, why do people have no sense of shame

[cherrytomatoboys]

People really are using chat gpt for everything. Why are people so scared to think.

[noah-kuttler]

[ghostzzy]

pretty sure i just got interviewed by an AI.

[tarekabdula130]

Are you looking for a job from home? Part time or full time. Opportunities like this don't come around often. Sign up now and start working from home!

More Detils

[mahamayax]

Generated by AI - ChatGPT, with whom I'm talking about my Tumblr management.

I have almost 2000 followers here, and I honestly don’t know where all of you came from. Tumblr is my journal for capturing impulses. This impulse consists of: color and truth. Here’s how I described it in the conversation:

GPT - Will you share what you post most often? Me - As soon as I see a beautiful photo, an object, a phenomenon, anything that catches my attention – I HAVE to save it, take a screenshot, take a photo. It's all impulsive. These are the kinds of photos I post on Tumblr. Sometimes, when I come back to a photo after a few days, it doesn't affect me as much; it still has that "something," but not as strongly. Then I subject the photo to inner critique and decide whether to post it or not. GPT - What grabs your attention the most? I know it's "everything," but maybe something special stands out first? Me - What distinguishes these photos: Mainly the colors. The color combination. It always has to be a beautiful color, a nice scheme. That's what triggers the impulse. Other things: truth. For example, a photo of a coffee cup taken with a phone in 16:9, in nice lighting and surroundings, will catch my attention much more than a professional studio shot, which is most likely retouched and lacks that "truth" or that "truth" becomes questionable.

Thank you 💗💜🥰

[paulgadzikowski]

Image description from the notes by @summery-captain:

"A post by James L. Cook, reading: "I was watching an interview with Noam Chompsky and he was asked about AI software, specifically Chat GPT and its impact on education. He replied that Chat GPT isn't about learning, it's about avoiding learning.

And then the light went on.

Recently I was in discussion with a peer group about an article written by James Marriot for the Times. He's basically an art school drop out that never spent any real time developing his skill to become an artist. And now he's bitter that he's not successful and that artists with real skill are 'gatekeepers' to his success.

To be honest it was a very entitled rant that demonized people who have worked very hard to hone their craft as elitists and prestige squatters. In his article he welcomes AI generators because he thinks it levels the playing field between his mediocre efforts and those snobby, gatekeeping artists.

And that's where the connection hit... (channels Chompsky) AI image generating isn't about making art. It is about AVOIDING making art. Let the computer do it. I'm too lazy to log the long emotionally wearing hours. I'm too impatient to listen to masters. I'm too self-absorbed to spend my time laboring over a work that requires me to use sophisticated critical thinking. Let the machine do it.

AI imagine generation isn't about making art. It's about AVOIDING MAKING art." End of imagine description

[jobbieresume]

https://jobbie.io

Visit now, and get yours sorted

[cinnabeat]

idk what the fuck was in the air in august but its like whatever was making me feel so bad for weeks left bc now im like. getting up and Doing Things its crazy

[ktempestbradford]

I have been on a Willy Wonkified journey today and I need y'all to come with me

It started so innocently. Scrolling Google News I come across this article on Ars Technica:

At first glance I thought what happened was parents saw AI-generated images of an event their kids were at and became concerned, then realized it was fake. The reality? Oh so much better.

On Saturday, event organizers shut down a Glasgow-based "Willy's Chocolate Experience" after customers complained that the unofficial Wonka-inspired event, which took place in a sparsely decorated venue, did not match the lush AI-generated images listed on its official website.... According to Sky News, police were called to the event, and "advice was given."

Thing is, the people who paid to go were obviously not expecting exactly this:

But I can see how they'd be a bit pissed upon arriving to this:

It gets worse.

"Tempest, how could it possibly--"

source of this video that also includes this charming description:

Made up a villain called The Unknown — 'an evil chocolate maker who lives in the walls'

There is already a meme.

Oh yes, the Wish.com Oompa Loompa:

Who has already done an interview!

As bad (and hilarious) as this all is, I got curious about the company that put on this event. Did they somehow overreach? Did the actors they hired back out at the last minute? (Or after they saw the script...) Oddly enough, it doesn't seem so!

Given what I found when poking around I'm legit surprised there was an event at all. Cuz this outfit seems to be 100% a scam.

The website for this specific event is here and it has many AI generated images on it, as stated. I don't think anyone who bought tickets looked very closely at these images, otherwise they might have been concerned about how much Catgacating their children would be exposed to.

Yes, Catgacating. You know, CATgacating!

I personally don't think anyone should serve exarserdray flavored lollipops in public spaces given how many people are allergic to it. And the sweet teats might not have been age appropriate.

Though the Twilight Tunnel looks pretty cool:

I'm not sure that Dim Tight Twdrding is safe. I've also been warned that Vivue Sounds are in that weird frequency range that makes you poop your pants upon hearing them.

Yes, Virginia, these folks used an AI image generator for everything on the website and used Chat GPT for some of the text! From the FAQ:

Q: I cannot go on the available days. Will you have more dates in the future? A: Should there be capacity when you arrive, then you will be able to enter without any problems. In the event that this is not the case, we may ask you to wait a bit.

Fear not, for this question is asked again a few lines down and the answer makes more sense.

Curious about the events company behind this disaster, I took myself over to the homepage of House of Illuminati and I was not disappointed.

I would 100% trust these people to plan my wedding.

This abomination of a website is a badly edited WordPress blog filled with AI art and just enough blog posts to make the casual viewer think that it's a legit business for about 0.0004 seconds.

Their attention to detail is stunning, from how they left up the default first post every WP blog gets to how they didn't bother changing the name on several images, thus revealing where they came from. Like this one:

With the lovely and compact filename "DALL·E-2024-01-30-09.50.54-Imagine-a-scene-where-fantasy-and-reality-merge-seamlessly.-In-the-foreground-a-grand-interactive-gala-is-taking-place-filled-with-elegant-guests-i.png"

"Concept.png" came from the same AI generator that gets text almost, but not quiiiiiite right:

There are a suspicious number of .webp images in the uploads, which makes me think they either stole them from other sites where AI "art" was uploaded or they didn't want to pay for the hi-res versions of some and just grabbed the preview image.

The real fun came when I noticed this filename: Before-and-After-Eventologists-Transformation-Edgbaston-Cricket-Ground-1024x1024-1.jpg and decided to do a Google image search. Friends, you will be shocked to hear that the image in question, found on this post touting how they can transform a boring warehouse into a fun event space, was stolen from this actual event planner.

Even better, this weirdly grainy image?

From a post that claims to be about the preparations for a "Willy Wonka" experience (we'll get to this in a minute), is not only NOT an actual image of anyone preparing anything for Illuminati's event, it is stolen from a YouTube thumbnail that's been chopped to remove the name of the company that actually made this. Here's the video.

If you actually read the blog posts they're all copypasta or some AI generated crap. To the point where this seems like not a real business at all. There's very specific business information at the bottom, but nothing else seems real.

As I said, I'm kinda surprised they put on an event at all. This has, "And then they ran off with all our money!" written all over it. I'm perplexed.

And also wondering when the copyright lawyers are gonna start calling, because...

This post explicitly says they're putting together a "Willy Wonka’s Chocolate Factory Experience" complete with golden tickets.

Somewhere along the line someone must have wised up, because the actual event was called "Willys Chocolate Experience" (note the lack of apostrophe) and the script they handed to the actors about 10 minutes before they were supposed to "perform" was about a "Willy McDuff" and his chocolate factory.

As I was going through this madness with friends in a chat, one pointed out that it took very little prompting to get the free Chat GPT to spit out an event description and such very similar to all this while avoiding copyrighted phrases. But he couldn't figure out where the McDuff came from since it wasn't the type of thing GPT would usually spit out...

Until he altered the prompt to include it would be happening in Glasgow, Scotland.

You cannot make this stuff up.

But truly, honestly, I do not even understand why they didn't take the money and run. Clearly this was all set up to be a scam. A lazy, AI generated scam.

Everything from the website to the event images to the copy to the "script" to the names of things was either stolen or AI generated (aka stolen). Hell, I'd be looking for some poor Japanese visitor wandering the streets of Glasgow, confused, after being jacked for his mascot costume.

HE LIVES IN THE WALLS, Y'ALL.

[feminist-space]

"Balaji’s death comes three months after he publicly accused OpenAI of violating U.S. copyright law while developing ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence program that has become a moneymaking sensation used by hundreds of millions of people across the world.

Its public release in late 2022 spurred a torrent of lawsuits against OpenAI from authors, computer programmers and journalists, who say the company illegally stole their copyrighted material to train its program and elevate its value past $150 billion.

The Mercury News and seven sister news outlets are among several newspapers, including the New York Times, to sue OpenAI in the past year.

In an interview with the New York Times published Oct. 23, Balaji argued OpenAI was harming businesses and entrepreneurs whose data were used to train ChatGPT.

“If you believe what I believe, you have to just leave the company,” he told the outlet, adding that “this is not a sustainable model for the internet ecosystem as a whole.”

Balaji grew up in Cupertino before attending UC Berkeley to study computer science. It was then he became a believer in the potential benefits that artificial intelligence could offer society, including its ability to cure diseases and stop aging, the Times reported. “I thought we could invent some kind of scientist that could help solve them,” he told the newspaper.

But his outlook began to sour in 2022, two years after joining OpenAI as a researcher. He grew particularly concerned about his assignment of gathering data from the internet for the company’s GPT-4 program, which analyzed text from nearly the entire internet to train its artificial intelligence program, the news outlet reported.

The practice, he told the Times, ran afoul of the country’s “fair use” laws governing how people can use previously published work. In late October, he posted an analysis on his personal website arguing that point.

No known factors “seem to weigh in favor of ChatGPT being a fair use of its training data,” Balaji wrote. “That being said, none of the arguments here are fundamentally specific to ChatGPT either, and similar arguments could be made for many generative AI products in a wide variety of domains.”

Reached by this news agency, Balaji’s mother requested privacy while grieving the death of her son.

In a Nov. 18 letter filed in federal court, attorneys for The New York Times named Balaji as someone who had “unique and relevant documents” that would support their case against OpenAI. He was among at least 12 people — many of them past or present OpenAI employees — the newspaper had named in court filings as having material helpful to their case, ahead of depositions."

[doink]

Bringing "Balloons Over Broadway" to Life - A Live Camera Project in Green Screen by DoInk

In the enchanting world of children's literature, "Balloons Over Broadway" by Melissa Sweet is a beloved tale that unfolds during the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade. You can make the story come to life with the magic of green screen technology. In this video tutorial blog post, we'll guide you through the process of creating a Live Camera Project in Green Screen by DoInk, where you can integrate your students, their balloons or both into the pages of "Balloons Over Broadway" and let their imagination take flight.

By combining the magic of the Green Screen by DoInk app with the enchanting pages of "Balloons Over Broadway," you can create an immersive experience that brings the story to life. Whether you're a teacher looking to engage your students or a storyteller aiming to captivate your audience, this project opens up a world of creative possibilities. Step into the pages of "Balloons Over Broadway" and let your imagination soar like the parade balloons themselves.

[ranjith11]

Avoid Burnout and Embrace Life | Essential Guide| Future Proof Accountants

Discover the transformative power of building a thriving offshore team for your business expansion and global talent acquisition. Unveil the key to effective collaboration and harmonious team dynamics through cross-cultural understanding within your remote workforce. In our latest YouTube video, we present insights into how Chat GPT, combined with AI technology, can empower accountants to navigate and appreciate diverse cultures within their offshore teams. Join us in exploring how AI fosters empathy, unity, and cultural cohesion in multinational team environments.

[sashayed]

"i asked chat gpt if--" don't bother finishing this sentence, mon ami. whatever you are going to say means nothing.* the other day i heard a professional journalist start an interview question this way to a person i admire very much, and i know it's just part of the language now and there's no real point in continuing to chafe against it, but the skin-crawling secondhand embarrassment i felt almost drove me out of the auditorium

*exception if it is VERY funny. it can't be just a little funny because it's always a little funny in a mostly depressing way, it has to be either a really left-field spectacular joke or a boggling self-own like that guy who sexually harrassed his AI "employee"

[ptej1980]

Well isn’t this interesting….

A creator on x decided to use AI to ask some Questions about PR relationships…

💀 GPT chat

Explain to me in 10 steps what a successful PR would be for a hidden relationship between two famous actors.

Successful PR for a hidden relationship between two actors follows a careful strategy to maintain mystery, generate interest, and control the narrative without completely exposing them. Here are 10 well-structured steps:

1. Define the purpose of the PR

Why keep the relationship a secret? It could be to protect their careers, avoid disrupting a film they're working on together, or simply to fuel the mystery and media attention.

2. Design an official story

Establish how you'll explain your relationship if questions arise. Are you just friends? Do you have mutual friends? Did you meet at an event? Your answers should be consistent.

3. Create strategic meetings

Situations are arranged where they can be seen together without raising suspicion: parties with other celebrities, group gatherings, or events where they both "coincidentally" meet.

4. Manage social media with subtlety

They may not interact too much, but they can leave subtle clues: liking specific posts, wearing similar clothes at different times, or sharing photos from similar locations without making it obvious they're together.

5. Control leaks

They carefully choose which details to leak to the media: someone saw them speaking at an event, a blurry photo at a dinner, a gesture that seems intimate but ambiguous.

6. Use allies in the media

Publicists work with trusted journalists and media outlets to influence how rumors are reported, ensuring the narrative remains under control.

7. Deny without denying

If you ask them directly, they can use answers like:

"We get along incredibly well, he's a great coworker."

"Don't believe everything you read, we're just friends."

"It's funny how people invent things."

These answers maintain the doubt without completely confirming or denying it.

8. Distract with other headlines

To prevent rumors from spreading too far, alternative news is generated: new projects, interactions with other actors, or even false rumors of relationships with other people.

9. Prepare a contingency plan

If a compromising photo is leaked or the relationship is accidentally confirmed, you should have a strategy ready:

"Yes, we are dating, but we want to keep it private."

"We're very close, but there's nothing romantic about it."

"We have nothing to say about it."

10. Decide the end of the PR

Over time, they may choose to reveal the relationship with an interview or a social media post, or they may quietly "break up," letting the media attention fade without explanation.

This type of strategy is frequently used in Hollywood to control the public narrative.

Do you have a couple in mind who you think follows these steps?

Why yes we do thank you chat GPT….

Me: Yes, Luke Newton and Nicola Coughlan.

Luke Newton and Nicola Coughlan have generated quite a bit of speculation about their relationship, especially due to their chemistry on Bridgerton and their off-set interactions. If they were following a PR for a secret relationship, it might look something like this:

1. Official narrative: They would say that they are "very good friends" and that their chemistry is only a result of their work as actors.

2. Strategic appearances: They would be seen together at group events, award ceremonies, and interviews, but never in overtly romantic situations.

3. Social media with subtle clues: Likes on posts, photos from similar locations without showing them together, ambiguous comments in interviews.

4. Controlled leaks: Some tabloids would publish that "a close source" has seen them very close, but without conclusive evidence.

5. Denial without denial: In interviews they would say things like: "We had a lot of fun working together, we have a great connection."

6. Media allies: Some more reliable media outlets would handle the issue with caution, while tabloids would exaggerate rumors.

7. Distraction with other rumors: They would be linked to other actors or attention would be focused on their upcoming projects to divert attention.

8. Crisis control: If a compromising photo were to come to light, they could say it was a moment between friends or an off-camera scene.

9. Possible revelation: If the PR works well and generates enough interest, they could make the relationship official at an event or on social media.

10. If they decide not to go public, they would simply stop interacting as much until the rumors die down.

Hmmmm Chat GPT interesting 🤔 what do you think?

[thevtuberlestat]

list of possible good reasons armand isn't in the s3 promo:

they're committing really hard to his vanishing act

under-qualified intern doing the promo posters asked chat gpt to summarize the show instead of watching it and chat gpt didn't bring him up

armand is a fiction we have all collectively dreamed up on tumblr dot com, unrelated to any real world character or concept

armand is a real person who sued amc and now they're having to respect his privacy

they're replacing him with a different, more evil vampire that has bigger bug eyes and a sadder backstory

lestat would be jealous

they've realized that armand's character arc has reached a perfect conclusion when he got dumped and thrown through that wall, so there's really nowhere else to go with the character

the ghost of anne rice bought his copyright back

they wrote a whole storyline in which armand becomes a pop diva and then belatedly realized they're doing the exact same thing with lestat. after this they wrote a second storyline for armand in which his memoir getting published led all the vampires in the world to try to fight him, but that was kinda redundant because louis was already doing that. they're hurriedly trying to come up with a new storyline for armand and i'm hearing it's going to involve him interviewing vampires

this is all a clever misdirection. armand is actually the only character in season 3