#Most Dangerous Sports

[newsblareonline]

The 10 Most Dangerous Sports You Can Play And Why It Is Worth The Risk

From sky-diving to base jumping, extreme sports often have an inherent risk of danger. For some thrill seekers, this is exactly the kind of rush they are looking for. But no matter how daring you may be, it's important to understand the risks associated with these activities before you take part in them. In this article, we're exploring the 10 most dangerous sports and why they might be worth the risk!

Skydiving

Skydiving is a sport in which people jump out of an airplane or helicopter and parachute to the ground. It is considered to be one of the Most Dangerous Sports because there is a risk of equipment failure or human error that could result in accidents or injuries. However, skydiving is also considered to be an extreme sport that can be thrilling and exhilarating for those who enjoy it. In order to minimize the risks associated with skydiving, it is important for jumpers to use properly maintained and tested equipment and to follow safety procedures and guidelines. It is also recommended that people who are interested in skydiving receive proper training and instruction before attempting to jump.

BASE Jumping

BASE jumping is an extreme sport that involves jumping from a fixed structure or cliff and using a parachute to descend to the ground. It is considered to be more dangerous than skydiving because jumps are typically made from lower altitudes and there is less time to deploy the parachute and correct any issues that may arise. There is also a higher risk of collision with the structure or terrain during the descent. BASE jumping is illegal in many places and is not recommended for those who are not highly skilled and experienced in the sport. It is also important for BASE jumpers to use properly maintained and tested equipment and to follow safety guidelines in order to minimize the risks associated with the sport.

Ice Hockey

Ice hockey is a fast-paced sport played on ice that involves two teams trying to score goals by shooting a hard rubber puck into the opposing team's net. It is considered to be a dangerous sport because of the high speeds at which the players skate and the possibility of collisions with other players or the boards surrounding the rink. Injuries are common in hockey and can include cuts, bruises, broken bones, and head injuries such as concussions. In order to minimize the risks of injury, hockey players wear protective equipment such as helmets, shoulder pads, gloves, and shin guards. It is also important for players to follow the rules of the game and practice good sportsmanship in order to prevent unnecessary injuries.

Mixed martial arts (MMA)

Mixed martial arts (MMA) is a full-contact sport that involves a combination of striking and grappling techniques from a variety of martial arts disciplines such as boxing, wrestling, and karate. MMA competitions are held in an octagon-shaped cage and are governed by rules that are designed to protect the safety of the competitors. Despite these rules, MMA is still considered to be a dangerous sport due to the physical nature of the competition and the potential for serious injuries. Injuries that can occur in MMA include cuts, bruises, broken bones, and head injuries. It is important for MMA fighters to wear protective equipment such as gloves, mouthguards, and headgear, and to follow the rules of the sport in order to minimize the risks of injury.

Bull riding

Bull riding is a rodeo event in which a cowboy rides a bucking bull for as long as possible. It is considered to be a dangerous sport because the bull is unpredictable and can throw the rider off, potentially causing injuries. Injuries that can occur in bull riding include broken bones, sprains, and head injuries. In order to minimize the risks of injury, bull riders wear protective gear such as helmets, vest, and chaps, and they also use a braided rope to hold onto the bull. It is also important for bull riders to follow safety guidelines and to be in good physical condition in order to better handle the physical demands of the sport. Despite the risks, bull riding can be an exciting and thrilling spectacle for both the riders and the spectators.

Rock climbing

Rock climbing is a sport in which people climb up cliffs or other rock formations using their hands and feet. It can be done indoors or outdoors, and there are many different styles of climbing, including traditional climbing, sport climbing, and bouldering. Rock climbing is considered to be a dangerous sport due to the risk of falls and other accidents that can result in serious injuries. Injuries that can occur in rock climbing include broken bones, sprains, and head injuries. In order to minimize the risks of injury, rock climbers use protective equipment such as a helmet, climbing shoes, and a harness, and they also follow safety guidelines and techniques. Rock climbing requires physical strength, skill, and mental focus, and it can be an exciting and challenging sport for those who enjoy it.

Street Luge Racing

Street luge is a gravity-powered extreme sport in which a person lies on a sled or luge board and races downhill on a paved road or track. It is similar to traditional luge, which is an Olympic winter sport, but it is performed on a street or pavement rather than on ice. Street luge is considered to be a dangerous sport because of the high speeds at which the riders travel and the risk of accidents and collisions. Injuries that can occur in street luge include broken bones, cuts, bruises, and head injuries. In order to minimize the risks of injury, street luge riders wear protective gear such as a helmet, gloves, and padding, and they also follow safety guidelines and rules. Street luge is not a widely popular sport and it is not sanctioned by any major sporting organization.

Whitewater rafting

Whitewater rafting is a recreational activity in which people ride on inflatable rafts through turbulent sections of a river. It can be a thrilling and exciting experience, but it also involves a certain level of risk due to the potential for capsizing or falling out of the raft and the possibility of encountering hazards such as rocks or other obstacles in the water. Injuries that can occur in whitewater rafting include cuts, bruises, broken bones, and head injuries. In order to minimize the risks of injury, it is important for rafters to wear appropriate clothing and personal protective equipment such as a helmet and life jacket, and to follow safety guidelines and instructions provided by the rafting company or guide. Whitewater rafting can be enjoyed by people of all ages and skill levels, but it is generally more suitable for those who are in good physical condition and comfortable in the water.

Heli Skiing

Heli skiing is a type of downhill skiing or snowboarding in which skiers or snowboarders are transported to remote mountain areas by helicopter and then descend down the slopes. It is considered to be an extreme and dangerous sport due to the inherent risks of being in the backcountry, such as avalanches, crevasses, and other hazards. Injuries that can occur in heli skiing include broken bones, sprains, and head injuries. In order to minimize the risks of injury, it is important for heli skiers and snowboarders to be in good physical condition and to have the necessary skills and experience for the terrain they will be skiing or snowboarding on. They should also wear appropriate safety equipment such as a helmet and beacon, and follow safety guidelines and instructions provided by the heli skiing company or guide. Heli skiing can be an exciting and unique experience for those who are willing to accept the risks and challenges of the sport.

Cave Diving

Cave diving is a type of diving in which divers explore underwater caves or other submerged structures. It is considered to be a dangerous and technical sport due to the specialized equipment and training required and the inherent risks of diving in an enclosed, unfamiliar environment. Cave diving can be affected by factors such as limited visibility, strong currents, and the possibility of getting lost or disoriented in the cave. Injuries that can occur in cave diving include decompression sickness, cuts, bruises, and drowning. In order to minimize the risks of injury, it is important for cave divers to be highly trained and experienced, to use properly maintained and tested equipment, and to follow safety guidelines and procedures. Cave diving is not recommended for those who are not properly trained and experienced, and it should only be attempted by those who are comfortable and confident in the water and are willing to accept the risks and challenges of the sport.

Why Do People Play These Sports?

People may play dangerous sports for a variety of reasons. Some may enjoy the thrill and excitement of participating in a risky activity, while others may be drawn to the physical challenges and the sense of accomplishment that comes with overcoming them. Some people may also be attracted to the sense of camaraderie and community that can develop among those who participate in these sports. Additionally, some people may be motivated by the opportunity to compete at a high level and test their skills and limits against other skilled athletes. Ultimately, the reasons why people choose to participate in dangerous sports are likely to vary depending on the individual and the specific sport in question.

Safety Tips For Participating in Extreme Sports

Here are some general safety tips for participating in extreme sports:

Get proper training and instruction: It is important to receive proper training and instruction from qualified instructors before attempting any extreme sport. This will help you develop the necessary skills and knowledge to safely participate in the sport.

Use the proper equipment: Make sure you have the right equipment for the sport you are participating in, and that it is in good condition. This can include things like helmets, gloves, padding, or other protective gear.

Follow safety guidelines and procedures: Familiarize yourself with the safety guidelines and procedures for the sport you are participating in, and make sure to follow them.

Know your limits: It is important to be aware of your own abilities and limitations, and to only attempt activities that are within your skill level.

Stay in good physical condition: Maintaining good physical fitness can help you better handle the physical demands of extreme sports and reduce the risk of injury.

Be mindful of the environment: Pay attention to your surroundings and be aware of any potential hazards, such as changing weather conditions or unstable terrain.

Have a plan in case of an emergency: Make sure you have a plan in place in case of an emergency, and know how to access medical assistance if needed.

The Benefits of Taking Part in High Risk Activities

While participating in high risk activities can be dangerous, there are also potential benefits to taking part in these types of activities. Some of the benefits of participating in high risk activities may include:

Thrill and excitement: Many people find that participating in high risk activities provides a sense of thrill and excitement that they may not get from more mundane activities.

Sense of accomplishment: Overcoming the challenges of a high risk activity can provide a sense of accomplishment and pride.

Physical and mental challenges: High risk activities often require physical and mental strength and can help people develop these skills.

Increased confidence: Participating in high risk activities can help people build confidence in their own abilities and decision-making skills.

Sense of community: Many people find that participating in high risk activities brings them closer to others who share their interests and helps them form strong bonds.

Personal growth: Taking on new challenges and pushing one's boundaries through high risk activities can help people grow and develop as individuals.

It's important to note that while there may be potential benefits to participating in high risk activities, it's also important to carefully consider the risks and to make sure that the potential rewards outweigh the potential dangers.

Conclusion

In conclusion, there are many sports and activities that are considered to be dangerous due to the inherent risks involved. These can include sports such as football, boxing, and bull riding, as well as activities like skydiving, cave diving, and heli skiing. It is up to each individual to decide whether the potential rewards of participating in these types of activities outweigh the potential risks. In order to minimize the risks of injury, it is important to receive proper training and instruction, use the proper equipment, follow safety guidelines and procedures, and be aware of one's own limits and abilities. Despite the risks, many people find that participating in high risk activities can provide a sense of thrill and excitement, a sense of accomplishment, and opportunities for personal growth. Read this blog also- How to meditate: Meditation for Beginners guide

[jaypentaghast]

[through tears] the vampires... they can't finger each other can they

[batsplat]

after 2015 until 2018 it seemed that things had calmed down a bit between valentino and marc, in the sense that they had started to be polite between them again and valentino no longer seemed to be on a war footing. then after argentina obviously the situation worsened again. in the podcast where valentino spoke in 2021 if I'm not mistaken, when he talks about marc,however, he only refers to the events of sepang and not to what happened in argentina which instead seemed to have been the final “divorce”. so my question is, during 2016 and 2017 did valentino just pretend to put up with marc? because in that podcast you can feel valentino's resentment is still a lot even after many years, so I imagine it must have been even greater in the two years immediately following sepang, even if it didn't seem if you see how he behaved

well. look. it was reflected in how valentino behaved... I think sometimes if you see isolated photos and gifsets, you can maybe be left with a bit of a mistaken impression of what that dynamic actually looked like for those two years. they got to a point post-catalunya where they were civil to each other, and maybe they'd exchange two lines in greeting, at podium celebrations, when somebody in a presser made a joke... and maybe marc at the very least was sincerely hoping they could get back to something like what they had before 2015. in reality, though, it was still very very far away. it wasn't open hostilities... at some point in 2016, valentino realised he simply couldn't go on like this. I talked about it a bit here:

you get this discrepancy in his 2016 output, actually. if you compare what he's saying that autumn for written press interviews vs what he's saying with marc right next to him... he'd clearly decided there was zero point in directly fanning the flames. at the sepang 2016 presser when marc and him are quizzed on what had happened the previous year, he just goes with marc's response and decides against reopening the controversy by adding anything from his side. but he still made it clear he hadn't changed his mind in interviews from the exact same time period! at times, he tolerates marc's tentative advances - at other times, he's almost accidentally sucked in, like he can't quite help himself from laughing at something marc has said. but there was never a period where he forgave marc for what he'd done... for various reasons he just decided he wasn't going to harp on about it too much. he did basically say as much post-argentina 2018:

but yeah, argentina 2018. it's an interesting one, isn't it? the stuff that valentino says there doesn't actually feel... quite in line with anything else he's said about marc. typically, when valentino criticises marc, it really is all about sepang 2015 - it's very focused, very specific, he's talking about being unable to forgive marc on a personal level for something marc had done to valentino... but it's not like he's really coming at marc for anything else... when other riders have gotten into spats with marc, he's stayed out of it - and generally he remains pretty neutral when he talks about everything else concerning marc. so, for example, there's a world where the moment alex rins is saying marc doesn't respect other riders in 2019, valentino immediately jumps at the opportunity to offer his hot take... but he doesn't do that. and yes, he had criticised marc's riding before, in particular in marc's moto2 days, but obviously those criticisms were considerably more restrained and sounded at times quite worried for marc's sake. (he also got close to that in silverstone 2016 when he remarked marc had 'something special' for their battles, but a) he's not wrong, except insofar as it's clearly mutual, and b) he explicitly said he didn't have a problem with that fight and considered it hard but fair). in 2017, when valentino was criticising other riders for being too aggressive... well, he wasn't doing so with marc, and he even conceded the point to marc in subsequent races after marc had obliquely criticised valentino at cota for his rhetoric not matching up to his own riding. when valentino's young riders have gotten into their own spats with marc, he's not waded in either, at most saying stuff about marc's fight with pecco that from his lips sounds almost like something akin to praise. radio silence after bez's run in with marc at the end of last year... argentina 2018 is the exception not the rule

and you know... at the end of the day, that was an emotional reaction. valentino might be wearing the habitual smile on his face during the media debrief and sound reasonably calm and composed, but he was furious. which, it's always worth remembering, isn't an entirely unreasonable reaction to that specific situation. yes, valentino doesn't have a clean track record either, but you're going to struggle to find such a... weaponised carelessness, a blatant disinterest in his fellow riders while shoving them aside, in the way marc was exhibiting that day - and indeed that whole weekend. looking back, of course argentina 2018 ended up being an isolated blot on marc's track record that he's not come close to repeating since (yes, he's made high profile errors that took out other riders, but it's different)... but we didn't know that at the time. also, I doubt valentino much appreciated being treated just like an obstacle in marc's path! the fact that valentino wasn't the only marc victim that weekend kind of has an interesting effect, because you have to doubt whether it would have helped if valentino felt like he was being targeted specifically by marc, but on the other hand... well, it's almost disrespectful, isn't it... being singled out is in a way still better than being brushed aside like any other rider

still, valentino's pushing it with his criticisms, he's out of line, and he clearly did lash out in the heat of the moment - which was of course largely a product of the resentment he'd been holding onto those past two years. calling marc's behaviour that day dangerous? sure, you'd find a lot of agreement for that. saying that marc was ruining the sport? that he was intentionally causing other riders to crash? ... well, hold on one moment. I reckon the simplest explanation is the best one here: valentino was angry and said stuff he wouldn't otherwise say, which we know because he's not done so before or since. of course, he was never going to retract what he said about marc that day - he wasn't ever going to apologise for it. not with their history, not when there was still just enough about those argentina comments that he meant... so he wasn't going to feel too much regret about the bits he wouldn't have said under any other circumstance. the problem post-2015 for valentino is that constantly signalling his fury to the world wasn't doing him much good... but pretending like everything was just fine clearly also took a bit of a toll. argentina 2018 wiped the slate clean - even though they gradually crept back towards basic civility after that. and valentino really didn't continue with that line of critique... since then he's basically completely reverted back to a sepang 2015-centric approach. maybe a few hints at it... in 2021, he said something along the lines of how he doesn't feel good when he's on-track with marc, but that's pretty generic while also crucially being personal - he's not saying marc is a problem for the series, he's saying it's them specifically that have an issue with each other

which doesn't mean he didn't believe what he said in argentina 2018 in the moment... when they reconvened in cota and had marc and valentino do separate media debriefs from the main presser, valentino said he stood by his comments - but also didn't actually repeat them or elaborate on them or anything. he's back to terse short responses to the press' questions, saying he wants to focus on the race ahead: kind of the go-to approach when it comes to marc post-sepang (with notable exceptions). he's walked his strongest comments back as much as he was probably ever going to - by simple virtue of the fact that he's left it at that. and you know, he's a complicated guy... 2016-17 was both pretending and it also wasn't. he didn't act like everything was forgotten, but he certainly was willing to let people believe that this relationship might end up being mended - which quite frankly was probably never going to happen. mostly, he was just sort of sick of the whole thing, struggling to enjoy himself in what had become such a charged, hostile environment for all the riders involved. at the same time, look - fundamentally, the interpersonal chemistry with marc was always fine. they click as people! they click as riders! marc makes valentino laugh! sometimes, that line between 'pretending' and 'letting yourself pretend' and 'actually not pretending at all' can be quite thin. when valentino talks in that time period about how much he enjoyed a battle with marc, of course he isn't lying - because he really does enjoy those fights! that's what racing is all about for him, and that's something him and marc still share! as long as marc isn't barging him aside and causing him to crash, that is. maybe it'd be easier if it were all a pretence, but it wasn't... sometimes, when you say you thought a race was hard and fair, you really do mean it and you really did have a lot of fun. sometimes, the struggle isn't actually acting nice for the cameras, it's trying to bite down the temptation to laugh alongside your sworn enemy

see also assen 2016... like, isn't this kinda wild? you've just had catalunya the race before, you've just had the mere semblance of a tentative start to a possible reconciliation - then they return to the place that was really the beginning of the end for them. they go on a few track familiarisation laps, including to check out the resurfaced final chicane (aka the scene of the crime). they race each other on said track familiarisation laps. then marc brings it up in the presser, giggling about the whole thing, and apparently valentino also finds it pretty funny - before he visibly swallows up his grin. later that weekend, marc pointedly decides to try out valentino's final chicane move himself during the warm up session. this is all obviously deranged, but it's a type of deranged where they are fundamentally on the same wavelength. it's the kind of ridiculous behaviour they're both incredibly fond of... you see it in how valentino shrugs off the towing at catalunya 2019, and thinks it speaks to marc's smarts and wiliness - unsurprising, really, because they're so similar in that regard, and valentino has never shaken his admiration for marc as a competitor

valentino can clamp down on his animosity towards a rival during his direct interactions with them... lord knows if you watch a few of the casey and valentino face-to-face interactions over the years, you really wouldn't match that up with the sheer vitriol of some of the stuff they were concurrently saying about each other in the press. that rivalry was never really personal (on valentino's end), it was never fraught in the same way (for valentino anyway) - still, it shows he's theoretically capable of separating this stuff out when he needs to... and he just about managed with marc for two years. if he had just been waiting for an excuse, surely you would have heard at least a hint of that when him and marc swapped paint in 2017. you never quite knew how he was going to answer the inevitable questions about marc's riding, but no direct criticism was forthcoming at any stage. the post-argentina 2018 rhetoric wasn't in any way premeditated from valentino's side, and personally I don't think he was just waiting for an excuse either. it was the result of a constant internal conflict between knowing that engaging in any more active beef with marc wouldn't do anyone any good, and the fact that he still hadn't forgiven marc... and then a race came along that simply pissed him off enough to push him over the edge

from 2016 onwards, valentino both very much wanted and very much did not want further conflict with marc, and neither of those impulses ever quite go away. usually, he's disciplined enough to avoid stoking the flames any further... potshots to the press outside of the paddock are essentially a free and harmless outlet in that regard, and even there you can tell he was trying to scale it back in the years where he was being forced to directly interact with marc. he was pretending and not pretending and sometimes pretending like he wasn't pretending and sometimes pretending like he was pretending. maybe it would have always just taken one major on-track confrontation for things to fall apart between them again... but you do kinda have to acknowledge the whole thing was really unfortunate. I've long thought that something like sepang 2015 was pretty inevitable as long as valentino managed to put himself in title contention once marc had joined the premier class, but I don't actually feel the same way about argentina 2018. an awful marriage of circumstance and coincidence and bad choices caused the relationship to fall apart again this badly. valentino might have had some more or less sincere misgivings about marc's riding, but at the end of the day he wasn't going to ever express them unless it got personal - because all of these people are incredibly self-centred and valentino wouldn't have felt like it was worth it. he lost his temper, he said some stuff he might partly but not fully believe, he's not inclined to bring it up again. that's that

[sainzstorms]

was yapping to my friend (who just watch her first f1 race with me!) about alex's appendicitis pipeline just to give her the idea on the significance of carlos' appendicitis to the grid in the future. rest assured that she wasn't expecting the twist and turns!

[the-writing-mobster]

| @frans-monthly | April Prompt: Sport — Hunting for Sport | The Most Dangerous Game | 💙🔪💔 |

.

.

.

A little late because I didn't know if it was appropriate for the prompt? But I was told it should be fine, so here it is! My screwed up TMDG art haha!

[suterbuyout2024]

when the poll ends do you mind sharing what you vs your friend thought the key hockey concept was? I'm so curious !

yes !! so skill play ended up winning, but if you combine the two categories of fighting and physical play, they add up to way more. this came up because i'm currently going through a whole emotional journey around violence in sport and the way personal choice, bodily autonomy, and the monolith of sports culture can overlap and conflict. that's not super important but i think more people should think about it because it's a really interesting and tough topic. anyway, i was talking to my friend from rural BC, and we were talking about violence/physicality as an inherent part of hockey or if there was a way to mitigate dangerous injury while still maintaining the spirit of hockey as a sport.

she was of the opinion that physical play, fighting, all of that were essential to hockey, and there was no way to play the same game without them. i'm still working on what my opinion is, but i'm finding that more and more i come down on the side of, hey, all of these injuries are unnecessary and there's no reason for hockey -- contact sport though it may be -- to be this dangerous and injurious. there's a lot of reasons i feel this way, but one of the biggest ones is that when i think of hockey -- when i think of the most important, joyous, exciting moments in hockey, moments that made me genuinely love this sport and the place it holds in my life -- i think almost entirely about skill play. what makes hockey worth watching for me is the speed, the skill, the insane passes and bad-angle goals. kirill kaprizov sidney crosby trick shot type shit. when those players have room to play, i love this sport like nothing else.

my friend, on the other hand, isn't wrong when she says that overall, the impression people have of hockey tends toward violence. even if they haven't thought about it enough to pass judgment, the vast majority of people think first of checks and fights.

the problem i have is that a lot of times, skill players are stifled by physical play. i like puck possession, but checking turns that into an almost irrelevant part of nhl hockey, and i like when superstars have space to do insane things, but if they're injured half the year because every fourth liner in the league pretty much has free reign to headhunt without the refs blowing the whistle, i don't get to see any of that. it's the same reason i'm annoyed with the way kirill's been treated in the league -- he's a phenomenal player who can do unparalleled things on the ice, but his production has been down because he got injured a couple seasons ago and hasn't had the space (or protection from further injuries, looking at you, dops) to heal it fully and get back to form. in what world is that the best that hockey can be? i'd rather every skill player gets long, obnoxious nhl careers than keep fistfights in a sport that really doesn't need them, but i'm aware i'm in the tiny minority there.

[jekyllnahyena]

so.

learned about rosquez

what the everloving fuck

[vonlipvig]

i don't know if this makes sense, but in disco elysium a 42% check is basically an 87% check, but in fallen london a 68% might as well be a 25%.

[fated-mates]

There are no wallflowers in space!

Voyage back to 2019 when we first investigated SPACE ROMANCE.

[newsblareonline]

10 Things To Know When It Comes To Health Insurance And Sports

If you're like most people, you're probably concerned about your health and how to protect yourself financially. In this article, we'll take a look at some important things to know about health insurance and sports so that you can make the best decisions for yourself.

What is health Insurance

Health insurance is a type of insurance that cover people’s medical expenses if they are injured or sick. It can also cover the costs of treatments and surgeries.

2. What is sports health insurance?

Sports health insurance is a type of health insurance that covers athletes and spectators who are injured while participating in sports. This type of health insurance can help to cover the costs of medical treatments, including surgery, and lost wages.

3. What is the difference between health insurance and sports health insurance?

Health insurance covers people’s medical expenses, while sports health insurance only covers injuries that occur while participating in sports. Health insurance also includes coverage for treatments and surgeries, while sports health insurance only includes coverage for lost wages due to an injury.

What is sports?

Sports are an important part of many people's lives. They can provide a way to exercise and have fun at the same time. Sports can also help to build physical and mental strength.

When it comes to health insurance, sports can be a big expense. If you are injured while playing sports, you may need medical treatment that is not covered by your health insurance. Even if your health insurance covers some sports-related injuries, it may not cover all of the costs.

That is why it is important to understand your rights and responsibilities when it comes to sports and health insurance. You should always speak with a health insurance advisor about your specific situation. They can help you understand your coverage and ensure that you are taking all of the necessary steps to protect yourself from injury.

Most Dangerous Sports

It's important to be aware of the dangers of some sports and to have health insurance that covers injuries that can occur while playing sports. Here are the five Most Dangerous Sports:

1. Football: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, football is the most dangerous sport in America. It accounts for more than 30,000 injuries each year, many of them serious. These injuries can include head injuries, spinal cord injuries, ruptured disks in the back, paralysis, and even death.

2. Baseball: Baseball is also a dangerous sport. In fact, it's one of the most common causes of death for young athletes. The CDC reports that baseball-related deaths range from mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) to fatal collisions at home plate.

3. Soccer: Soccer is another popular sport that can be very dangerous. Injuries related to soccer account for more than 2,000 emergency room visits each year. These injuries can include ACL tears, chest wall tears, broken bones, and concussions.

4. Bungee Jumping – This sport is notorious for resulting in fatal accidents. Bungee jumping involves participants leaping from high platforms or bridges and using bungee cords to swing them downward. The movement of the body during the jump can cause injuries that can lead to death. If you're considering trying this activity, make sure to talk to an expert about safety precautions and how to minimize your risk of injury.

5. Skydiving – This sport is also dangerous and has resulted in numerous fatalities over the years. Skydiving involves jumping from an aircraft at high speeds and sometimes without a parachute. The wind resistance during the jump can cause severe injuries, including brain damage or even death. If you're considering trying this activity, be sure to talk to an experienced skydiver about your risks and how best to prepare for your jump.

Sports insurance and coverage

Some people think that sports insurance is only for people who are injured in a sport. But sports insurance can protect you from anything that might happen while you are participating in a sport.

For example, if you are playing in a basketball game and you injure your foot, your sports insurance will cover the cost of surgery to repair the injury. And if you get into a car accident while out driving with your team, your sports insurance will cover the cost of your injuries and any damages to your car.

The important thing to remember when it comes to sports insurance is that it covers not just injuries that occur during a sporting event, but also any pre-existing conditions that you may have. This means that if you have a history of knee pain, your sports insurance may cover the cost of surgery to fix that problem even if you don’t get injured during a game.

So whether you are playing in an organized sport or just trying out something new, make sure to have adequate coverage. Sports insurance can help protect you from financial ruin and potential long-term physical health problems.

Healthcare Basics

When it comes to health insurance, it's important to understand the basics. Healthcare is a valuable commodity, and it's important to protect yourself and your family from financial ruin in the event of an illness or injury.

One of the most important things you can do to protect yourself is have health insurance. Health insurance is essentially insurance that covers medical expenses. It can cover things like doctor visits, hospital stays, and prescription drugs. In addition, health insurance can provide financial protection in the event of an illness or injury. This means that you won't have to worry about paying for expensive medical bills out of pocket.

Another important thing to know about health insurance is that it doesn't just cover medical expenses. Health insurance can also provide financial protection in the event of an accident. This means that you won't have to worry about paying for expensive medical bills or car repairs out of pocket.

There are a number of different types of health insurance available, and it's important to find one that fits your needs and budget. There are also a number of different ways to buy health insurance, so don't be afraid to shop around.

Why Sports are dangerous

One of the dangers of playing sports is that it can be very dangerous. This is especially true for young athletes who are not yet experienced with the sport. Sports can cause serious injury, and some injuries can be fatal.

When it comes to health insurance, it is important to know what type of coverage you need. Many people think that they only need health insurance to cover medical costs if they get injured in a sports activity. However, this is not always the case. Health insurance can also cover lost wages if you are unable to work because of an injury. It can also pay for rehabilitation services if you are injured and need to recover from the injury.

If you have any questions about health insurance or sports injuries, please do not hesitate to contact our office for help.

How Health Insurance Can Affect Your Workouts

Health insurance can have a big impact on your workouts. If you have health insurance, it may cover some of the costs of sports-related injuries. This means that you don't have to worry about paying for expensive medical bills yourself.

However, health insurance doesn't always cover injuries sustained while working out. If you're uninsured, you may have to pay for any injuries yourself. This can be a big financial burden, especially if you incur expensive medical expenses.

It's important to research your health insurance policy before beginning any intense workouts. You may find that your coverage includes specific types of sports or activities. If not, you'll need to find a policy that offers adequate coverage for your needs.

Major Benefits of Sports

One of the major benefits of sports is that they are a great way to stay healthy and fit. Sports can help to improve your cardiovascular health, strength, and flexibility. They can also help you lose weight and reduce your risk of developing chronic diseases.

Another major benefit of sports is that they are a great way to relieve stress. Sports can help you release endorphins, which are hormones that have anti-inflammatory properties. This helps to reduce the risk of developing chronic diseases and helps to improve your moods.

If you are interested in participating in sports, it is important to be aware of your health insurance policies. Some health insurance companies offer generous coverage for sports injuries. You may also be able to get reimbursement for doctor visits and other medical expenses related to your sport activities.

Types of Insurance Plans Available

There are a variety of different types of health insurance plans available. Some plans are offered through employers, while others are available directly from health insurers.

One important thing to keep in mind is that not all health insurance plans are the same. Each plan has its own benefits and drawbacks. It's important to compare the different options available to you to find the one that's best for you.

Another important thing to keep in mind is that health insurance doesn't just cover medical expenses. Many plans also offer coverage for hospitalization and prescription drugs. So, if you're a sports enthusiast, make sure to check out the different health insurance options available to you.

12 Things You Should Know About Health Insurance

Health insurance can help to cover the costs associated with health care. It can also help to pay for sports injuries and other medical expenses.

There are a few things you should know about health insurance when it comes to sports.

1. Health insurance typically doesn't cover all of the costs associated with sports injuries. You may have to pay for doctor visits, medication, and other treatments yourself.

2. Health insurance typically doesn't cover the costs of sports participation. This includes equipment, lessons, and other expenses related to playing sports.

3. Health insurance often has limits on how much it will pay for medical expenses. You may have to pay most of the costs yourself if your health insurance doesn't cover them.

4.Health insurance usually doesn't cover the cost of long-term care. This includes care for elderly relatives or people who are institutionalized.

5. Health insurance often has exclusions for certain types of sports. These include sports that are considered too dangerous or risky.

6.Health insurance can help you cover the costs of medical expenses if you are injured while participating in sports or if you become ill as a result of your sport.

7. You should always speak with your health insurance company to find out what types of sports are covered and what the deductibles and other requirements are.

8. You may be able to get coverage for sports-related injuries even if you don’t have health insurance. Check with your local emergency services or the American Red Cross for more information.

9. If you have a pre-existing condition, make sure that your health insurance policy includes coverage for sports-related injuries.

10. You may be able to get a reduced premium or a free policy if you have a healthy history with your health insurer.

11. Be sure to keep up with your doctor’s appointments and follow their advice about exercise and diet during your recovery period from an injury or illness related to sports participation or recreational activity.

12. Make sure that all members of your family are included in your health insurance plan, even if they do not participate in sports or recreation activities.

When Can I File A Claim For My Sports Injury?

If you suffer an injury while playing or practicing sports, you may be eligible to file a claim with your health insurance company. There are a few things to keep in mind when filing a claim:

-You should file your claim as soon as possible. This will help to speed up the process and ensure that you receive the most benefits from your health insurance policy.

-Make sure to document your injury. Include any photos, videos, or medical records that may help your health insurance company determine whether you are eligible for benefits.

-Keep all relevant paperwork handy when you file your claim. This includes medical bills, police reports, and any other documentation related to your injury.

Health insurance policies vary somewhat from company to company, but most of them have similar guidelines for filing a claim. If you have any questions about how to file a claim or how your health insurance policy works, be sure to speak with an agent representative or customer service representative.

Medical Emergencies

When it comes to health insurance and sports, it's important to be knowledgeable about what is covered and what is not. One important aspect of health insurance that many people don't know about is medical emergencies.

Medical emergencies are covered by most health insurance plans, including those that are designed for athletes. This means that if you have a medical emergency while participating in sports, your health insurer will cover the costs of any necessary hospitalization or surgery.

While medical emergencies are usually very costly, they are a valuable coverage option for athletes. In the event of an accident, for example, having medical insurance can help to protect you financially. Additionally, having medical insurance can give you peace of mind in the event of an injury.

Who's at risk for not having health care coverage?

Some people who don't have health care coverage may be at risk for not being able to get treatment if they get sick. This includes people who are unemployed, have low income, or don't have insurance through their employer.

People who are at risk for not having health care coverage may also be at risk for not being able to get sports injuries treated. This is because many sports injuries require surgery or other treatments that aren't covered by most health insurance plans.

There are a few ways to try to get health care coverage. You can find information about the different types of coverage available on the website of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). You can also call 1-800-MEDICARE (1-800-633-4227) to speak with a customer service representative.

Conclusion

When it comes to health insurance and sports, you want to make sure that you're getting the most out of your coverage. Here are 10 things you need to know in order to make sure you're getting the best possible care:

-Know what is covered under your policy

-Review your benefits carefully

-Be aware of any copays or deductibles your policy has

-Be aware of any special exclusions that apply to sports injuries

-Understand how long coverage will last for injuries sustained while participating in sports

[dreamsicle262]

im gonna use your mutual finding activities to find people to follow honestly so bless u for that

aw thank u

we're both hunting for moots now

[batsplat]

hello, i have a question. what is the difference betwwen a hard and a dangerous racer? is there some sort of characteristics like how succesful a racer is or is more of a "a dangerous racer races on the limit and that's dangerous. a hard racer races on the limit but. its just a hard racer". thank you for answering!

completely in the eye of the beholder, I'm afraid. it's a perpetual debate, and one where everyone draws the line differently... very much a case of one man's dangerous manoeuvre is another one's hard but fair overtake... that being said! I'll have a go at coming up with a general framework with which people assess this stuff

let's bring in two strawmen, which feels like the most direct way to illustrate the possible stances you can take on this debate. to be clear, nobody really fits neatly in either ideological category - but, well, these are pretty much the two most extreme positions anyone could have:

when people are describing something as 'hard racing' (as opposed to... idk, 'clean' racing), they are usually talking about a) contact between the two bikes, and/or b) an action that forces the other bike to take evasive action. what constitutes forcing evasive action? well, this is all very nebulous and hard to define - there's crossing another rider's racing line, making them pick up the bike mid-corner, forcing them wide/off-track, not yielding in situations where one of you will have to yield to avoid a crash... but this is always an assessment that will depend on the specific circumstances. not every block pass is considered hard racing, for instance, even though you are quite literally 'blocking' the other bike. contact is the more straightforward one... if you initiate a move that leads to contact, then most people would agree this is 'hard' racing

so say you are in the 'A' camp. according to this line of thinking, pretty much every contact is 'dangerous' riding and should not be allowed. here's what gibernau said about jerez 2005, included in the sete post:

let's not discuss the merits of the jerez 2005 move specifically here - this is an expression of a broader ideological position. "this is not a contact sport" "it's not about hitting another guy"... so, according to this stance, actions that knowingly result in contact should not be acceptable and as a result need to be penalised. taken to the logical extreme, any and all 'hard racing' is dangerous

let's go to the other extreme, 'B'. let's say you're very pro-hard racing, to the point where you think that contact is more than fine and that it is unreasonable to call it 'dangerous'. sure, of course it is dangerous, but inherently all motorcycle racing has a lot of risk attached. racing that involves contact is basically acceptable. even within this extreme, my lovely venn diagram allows for some actual 'dangerous' riding - either behaviour that is wholly irresponsible during races... or stuff that doesn't count as hard racing because it's not 'racing'. here are some examples:

stuff that happens during races but is like... egregious misbehaviour. cf romano fenati pulling a rival's brake lever during a race - obviously dangerous and no longer really exists within the confines of actual racing

in either races or non-race sessions - not following proper safety procedures like for instance ignoring yellow flags. again, should be pretty obvious why that's dangerous

poor behaviour in non-race sessions,the general tag for not exhibiting appropriate care, awareness for your environment, all that stuff... the extreme example is marc barrelling into the back of another rider after the chequered flag had been waved in friday practise at phillip island 2011 (more on that here). it's also things like faffing about on the racing line, see the pecco mugello dramatics

so, yes, everyone will agree that there's some stuff that counts as 'dangerous riding' that's distinct from 'hard racing' just because it's not actual racing. that's the most straightforward stuff... but yeah, anyway, those are basically the two extreme positions you can take. you can say that all contact is bad and dangerous, that any time you're forcing another rider to take evasive action and are making a pass that isn't 1000% clean, you are putting others at unnecessary risk. or, you can say, hey, everything goes, rubbing is racing on steroids - sure, there's a small category of things that aren't acceptable, mainly stuff that isn't actually racing, but otherwise you should be allowed to brute force yourself past riders whenever you please

obviously, they're strawmen for a reason. basically nobody holds either of these positions in their entirety - and in race situations, there's always going to be actions that are seen as hard racing by some and as dangerous by others. so, unfortunately, we're going to have to dig a little deeper here, and figure out by what metrics people draw the line between hard and dangerous. let's... hey, how about we bring in casey stoner, just this once. as a treat. here's what he said after laguna '08:

“I’ve been in hard racing all my life, some very aggressive racing, but today was a little bit too much. I nearly went in the gravel so many times and I don’t think it was necessary.”

hard racing? casey's done that before. some very aggressive racing? no issue. but what valentino did at laguna was "a little bit too much" and not "necessary". the specific thing casey cites is nearly going into the gravel - and indeed, forcing other riders wide/off-track is one of the types of racing behaviour that most finely straddles the line between 'hard' and 'dangerous'. for other examples, see suzuka 2001 in which biaggi forced valentino off-track and valentino flipped him off when he eventually got past (a few more details here), qatar 2012 where marc forced luthi off-track and got slapped after the race (here) and sepang 2015, where... uh. you know. or how about argentina 2018 where... look, I think you get the point - plenty of controversy comes from forcing your opponent's bike into places where it's simply not supposed to be

while we're at it, let's throw in a little excerpt from casey's autobiography about the race:

A lot of it was fair racing, he was out-braking me on the inside and riding better than me around a lot of the track. If it had all been like that I would cop it sweet. But a couple of moves off camera added to my frustration. I risked running off the track, and racing at the limits like that as we were I even became worried about my safety.

(does have to be said that the pair of them spend... relatively little time off-camera, never when the bikes seem to be particularly close - but of course the problem this statement creates is that by definition you can't judge any footage you don't have access to)

so, let's strip away the details and think about what casey is actually talking about here. it's a risk/reward calculation. this is what's at the heart of this riding standards debate: what level of risk is acceptable for what level of reward? there are situations in which there is inherently a higher level of risk in a way that isn't caused by either party - influenced by the circuit layout, what the weather is like, how hard you're both pushing aka how much on the 'limit' you are, and so on. but even if that risk isn't your 'fault', if you are riding at very high speeds on a dangerous track, you can still be considered a dangerous rider if you're not exercising appropriate levels of caution

so, let's break it down even further and try and come up with some basic criteria by which people judge whether a specific move is 'hard' or 'dangerous'. how about this: (1) does the action have a reasonable chance of coming off, (2) is the risk you're taking proportionate to the reward, and (3) is the move likely to cause serious harm to you or the other rider. let's take them one by one

listen, it needs to be plausible that you're going to be able to pull this move off. if you're firing the bike from fifty miles back into a gap that doesn't exist, then this is by definition an unnecessary risk. you are not going to do yourself any good and you are also not going to do the other rider any good. (sometimes it might be in your interest to crash the other rider out so you might as well, but unsurprisingly this is frowned upon. see the 1998 250cc title decider.) obviously, this is going to be affected by your skill level - if you're a mid rider, there will be fewer moves that are 'plausible' for you than for the best riders

this is basically the common sense metric. if you are riding in a pack, make sure to keep in mind that crashing in this situation could get ugly. if you are fighting for p5, maybe a different approach is fitting than fighting for p1. if you can make an overtake a lap later as long as you're patient, in a way that's a lot safer than doing it now, perhaps just do that instead. don't be silly in the wet! this comes down to stakes, whether it's worth it, how likely the move is to succeed... and also what the consequences would be if you got it wrong, for both yourself and other riders. you're making an overall judgement based on all of those factors... sometimes you need to take risk, but it's better to make sure that risk is reasonably sensible

however high the potential rewards are, there's a certain level of risk that is no longer acceptable, where the 'risk/reward calculation' stuff has to be thrown out of the window because the reward no longer matters. this is basically the catch-all for 'wholly irresponsible riding' - anything that's just going too far

so, uh. obviously everything described above is super subjective... but that's what people are judging in my opinion, this is the standards they are using in their head to determine where they draw the line. so, as an example, to bring back the stuff from this post about the inter-alien ideological differences:

and again, this is also what the debate after aragon 2013 was about:

if you think aragon 2013 is unacceptable to the point of being dangerous, then you probably take quite a hard line view and think pretty much any action that could lead to contact needs to be stamped down on. while that contact did have unpleasant consequences for the other party (dani wasn't able to walk for several days and his title bid was basically over), it is perhaps a little worse than could have been reasonably expected in that situation. in that sense, there's a bit of surface level similarity with jerez 2005... there, valentino made the pass for the win at the last corner, knowing he would probably bump into sete while doing so. neither rider is knocked off their bike (though sete has to leave the track) and it is at a slow corner, with relatively 'light' contact. unfortunately, as a result of where valentino's bike impacted sete's body and sete's preexisting shoulder issues, it ended up injuring sete (see here for valentino learning of this perhaps a little later than was ideal and only after he'd taken the piss out of sete for dramatically clutching his arm). at aragon 2013, marc was harrying dani and sticking very close to his rear tyre as he applied pressure to his teammate before he made a small misjudgement, getting his braking a little wrong and clipping the back of dani's bike. he happened to cut a crucial wire in the process, causing dani to highside a few moments later

these aren't equivalent situations and each have their own risk/reward profile. but the basic point is this: inviting contact with another rider will always generate more risk, and can always have unintended consequences... even when the action is relatively innocuous and the rider would not have expected this outcome. if you are in the 'all passes should be clean passes' school, this risk is fundamentally unacceptable. even trickier - what if contact is made as a result of a move you initiated but the other rider could have avoided? of course, you started it, but they could have yielded... and maybe they should have, maybe that would have been the wise, the sensible thing to do in that situation. it's always important to remember that at least two riders are involved in all these situations - and there are many cases where contact and/or crashing is not 100% the fault of any one party. so, for instance, there are several moments in laguna 2008 that are so risky in part because casey is also refusing to yield. that's not to necessarily imply any blame or fault! of course, it might not be ideal for the most aggressive riders being able to bully everyone else as they please because they know they can generally rely on everyone else being more sensible and yielding. but the differing outcomes resulting from the choices made by the 'other' rider will always help influence perception of any race situation - a move that is seen as 'hard but fair' might have been seen as considerably more dangerous if the other party hadn't yielded

and yes... yes, there is absolutely a question of your success rate. this links back to point (1) - is the move plausible? there are moves that aren't really considered examples of 'hard racing' and certainly not dangerous... because they worked. take valentino's last corner move at catalunya 2009, at a corner where you don't traditionally overtake (remember, before the race jorge was going around tempting fate by saying that if you're ahead by that point you're sorted). sure, he goes for a gap that exists, but it could easily have gone wrong - and if a lot of other riders had tried that, then it would have. how do you think yamaha would have felt if valentino had taken both yamaha riders out at the very end of the race to allow ducati to claim an unlikely victory and an increased championship lead? here's another one: misano 2017 and marc making a last lap move in treacherous conditions to snatch the win. no contact required to make that risky as shit - and if stuff like that goes wrong too often they call you an idiot at best and dangerous at worst. of course, both valentino and marc have had moments where they very much did not pull off moves they were intending, which is how we get ambition outweighing talent and 'I hope he can learn from this one and improve for the future', among other hits. but, relative to the amount of risk they're regularly taking in their racing, they get a lot of reward for their troubles... because they're very good at what they do. the risk/reward calculation is one that they... uh, can both be very adept at, but it's also one that's fundamentally easier when you're skilled enough to pull off a lot of moves that would be beyond the capabilities of other riders. it's when you don't know how to judge your moments, when you keep trying moves that you can't pull off - that's where other riders will start having a problem with you

which is where we get to reputation! how different incidents are judged will also depend on the existing reputations of the riders involved and whether they are seen as 'fair' racers or not (an even more nebulous term, if possible), versus hard racers, dangerous racers... often, this is a question of quantity too - with certain riders on the grid, you will notice they're involved in controversial incidents disproportionately often. how likely people are to pay you the benefit of the doubt... how likely they are to believe you as to what your intent was in a certain situation, perhaps the most nebulous concept of them all. 'hard' and 'dangerous' aren't assessments that are made in isolation, and how severely riders are judged will often depend on their pasts and how those pasts are perceived by others

where you get into really sticky territory is... okay, both valentino and marc have more often than not (arguably) been able to stay on the right side of 'the line', where their moves might be hard but aren't putting anyone else in active danger - but that's because they are at least theoretically capable of exhibiting a good sense of judgement and are also good at what they're doing, as covered above. here's a question: do they bear any responsibility for when younger and/or worse riders copy their moves and/or general approach to racing, with worse consequences? when they have been criticised, when they are called dangerous, at times it's not just what they're doing in the moment... it's what they're inspiring. so you've got stuff like this from sete:

even more drastically than that, after the death of a fifteen year old rider in supersport in 2021, one of his fellow rider said this about marc (which marc unsurprisingly strongly pushed back on):

(just worth remembering, this is a rider who did walk away from the sport as a result and was clearly deeply affected by what happened - the marc comments were part of a longer statement that got overshadowed by this part and the resulting controversy)

setting aside the merits or lack thereof of these specific assertions, what of the general questions they raise... can you be a dangerous rider in an indirect fashion like this, by the very nature of your legacy? are riders who helped bring about a more aggressive baseline standard of racing in any way responsible for anything that happens as a result of this standard? (even worse, there's a line of succession here - after all, who was marc's biggest inspiration?) or does individual responsibility reign supreme here? athletes are by design only interested in their own successes, aren't they - and 'legacy' is so abstract, how can anyone know how others will be influenced by what they do? how can we even begin to assess how big an influence individual riders really are? let's not forget that there will be other factors - riders in the past have discussed how particular characteristics of the moto2 class have bred more aggressive racing, or the influence of the size of motogp bikes, or how difficult it is these days to overtake in a completely 'clean' manner, or the rules themselves and to what extent they have actually been enforced etc etc... maybe there's also an element of people focusing on the easiest, most visible explanation in the form of star riders, without giving proper consideration to the underlying factors that will influence an era's style of riding. again, how you feel about all of this will vary from person to person - but part of the hard vs dangerous debate is inherently forward-looking. and it's hardly just legacy... your hard/dangerous moves may also be setting a precedent in the present. to what extent is it the duty of riders to worry about that?

so then, that's what I've got. how you draw the distinction between hard racing and dangerous riding will come down to your individual ideological position and what you think racing even entails. do you think all contact is objectionable? do you think only the most extreme of transgressions - most of which don't qualify as 'racing' per se - should be labelled dangerous? somewhere in between? everyone will draw the line in a different place, according to the situation and their individual biases and understanding of events. it comes down, generally speaking, to how you judge the risks and rewards of a certain move, whether you think what a rider attempted was 'worth' it. all of which depends on whether the rider could realistically have managed whatever action they were attempting, whether the potential rewards were proportionate to the risks, or whether the whole thing was just too flat out dangerous to ever be worth it... of course, none of these are objective standards by which you can assess the racing, but they should give you a rough indication of what people are even talking about when they're distinguishing between hard and dangerous racing. riders as individuals are also far from consistent in their stances (surely not!) so you do have to play it by ear a lot of the times... and while there are plenty incidents where the majority can agree whether it is 'hard' or 'dangerous', there are plenty more where you're going to get a lot of contradictory opinions. no definitive answers here - unfortunately a lot of the time you'll just have to make your own mind up

[hiddenbeks]

anyway back to kotorposting. one thing to know abt liah is that if she wasn't a jedi she would be a famous swoop racer

[chronal-anomaly]

Lena standing up and stretching her back far enough that her head nearly hits the ground. Lena casually sitting in the splits, or folding herself up into the most uncomfortable looking sitting arrangements for the sole reason that she can.

[greenvertumna]

This is why you don’t forbid teenage girls from seeing boys they like. Now your daughter is getting in a helicopter alone with four dudes she barely knows.

[jrrtfanforlife]

I feel sorta disloyal, but I’m trying out a different roller derby league today.

The practical reason is that - the city I live in doesn’t have roller derby, so I have to go to a nearby city either way. The one I went to initially was just the first one I found googling, and my therapist is there anyways, so I figured eh alright, this is the convenient option. But actually the other city is a little closer, so in a way more convenient for me.

The positive reason is - I have gotten very excited about roller derby and skating in general, but there aren’t any public skating rinks here, so the best way to get more time on the skates is to join a second league so I get four opportunities per week to skate instead of just two.

The slightly less positive reason is I’m a bit annoyed at some aspects of how my original league is run. I got the chance to play in two scrimmages, and I had a fuckin blast, and only after that second scrimmage did one of the trainers passive-aggressively hint that actually I shouldn’t have been in the scrimmage. Overall they’re super strict about what you’re allowed to do. Some trainers even more so than others. And like yes, it’s a dangerous sport, but there are ways to more safely do stuff and it feels a bit stifling

…..

Anyways I didn’t finish writing this. But I went and did the thing, and it was a beginner training cuz it’s fresh meat day, but it was still a lot of fun. I absolutely will get a chance to do more scrimmages there. Well, as long as we get enough people interested. Cuz at the first place the issue is the team is too big and too focused on the official Bundesliga games. The second place, it’s almost too small. They said only 8 people regularly show up to practices. Ideally you need 15 for a game. Theoretically you only have 5 on the track at once, but it’s a damn hard sport so you need time to catch your breath.

The way my initial team talks about it all they say they’re just focused on safety. I shouldn’t play in scrimmages because I don’t have enough control over all the finer points of skating yet. Which, I’m sure that is a real part of it. The new team has a different perspective though - they think the initial team is just very focused on funneling people into the Bundesliga games. For now I’m happier to go to the second team where they’re more chill overall. In fact, I’m allowed to do both, so I’ll just do that for now