Tumgik
#QUESTIONS DE FANS
Text
Tumblr media
DEPUIS 1994 FANS
VYPER Japanese Music a organisé un concours ouvert à l’international. Grâce à la collaboration de Fanbases du monde entier sur Facebook, l’événement a suscité de la part d’un grand nombre de fans un vif intérêt. Après un tirage au sort qui a été effectué le 01/102015, voici les réponses données aux questions choisies.
Coralie - Bonjour KAMIJO ! Y-a t-il une chanson française en par-ticulier que vous souhaiteriez re-prendre en japonais ?
K - Tout au contraire : j’aimerais chanter mes propres chansons en français.
Mickay - Que pensez-vous de l’évolution du Visual Kei de nos jours ? Comment voyez-vous son avenir ?
K - Je ne comprends pas trop de Visual Kei d’aujourd’hui. Il n’y a pas d’artiste par qui je sente mena cé. Mais peut-être, dans le futur, y aura-t-il des groupes recherchant la beauté...
Clio - Lors de la confection des costumes, comment se déroulent les choses ? Vous propose-t-on des modèles préconçus, ou bien une série de bases que vous pouvez améliorer par la suite ?
K - Tout d’abord, je dessine mes propres idées. Ensuite, je les réalise et les améliore avec le designer.
Auro - Pour commencer, merci pour tout, vous êtes incroyable ! Ma question est la suivante : quand vous écrivez des chansons, vous arrive-t-il de vous dire qu’il est possible que l’une d’elles « sauve une vie » ? Prenez-vous parfois conscience que vos compositions peuvent contribuer positivement au quotidien de quelqu’un ?
K - C’est en rêvant à ceci que je m’évertue à continuer d’écrire des chansons.
Aldo - Si vous prévoyez des surprises pour 2016, pouvez-vous nous en dire plus ?
K - Je peux simplement vous dire que je vous délivrerais une histoire purement belle et fraîche !
V - Avez-vous un message à trans-mettre à nos lecteurs ?
K - J’ai pris beaucoup de plaisir à répondre à vos questions, qui sont très bien travaillées. Pouvoir re-commencer serait un grand plaisir. Venez assister à mon concert
2 notes · View notes
rogloptimist · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
LAKE MISSOULA x JONAS VINGEGAARD
credits under cut!
lake missoula - richy mitch and the coal miners // jonas vingegaard - team presentation, tour de france 2024 // jonas vingegaard, tadej pogacar, and remco evenepoel - podium ceremony, tour de france 2024 (belga images) // tadej pogacar and jonas vingegaard - tour de france 2024 // wayward son - rainbow rowell // jonas vingegaard - stage 21, tour de france 2024 // it's down to legs - caley fretz // jonas vingegaard - stage 20, tour de france 2024 // jonas vingegaard - tour de france 2024 // jonas vingegaard - stage 11, tour de france 2024 // a poem on hope - wendell berry // jonas vingegaard and remco evenepoel - stage 19, tour de france 2024 // quora user shulamit widawsky // jonas vingegaard - stage 21, tour de france 2024 (getty images) // jonas vingegaard - stage 21, tour de france 2024 post-race interview (flobikes) // 'now the fight is over': jonas vingegaard concedes tour de france battle for yellow, but still aims for second - adam becket // jonas vingegaard - stage 19, tour de france 2024 post-race interview (flobikes) // video: jonas vingegaard and matteo jorgenson consoled after heart-breaking end to stage 19 of 2024 tour de france for team visma | lease a bike - kieran wood // jonas vingegaard - tour de france 2024 // jonas vingegaard - tour de france 2024 // 'probably the hardest moment of my career'-- jonas vingegaard on his crash and fight to be ready for the tour de france - stephen farrand // jonas vingegaard's tour de france was a venn diagram - iain treloar // rise up and salute the sun: the writings of suzy kassem - suzy kassem // jonas vingegaard - tour de france 2023 // jonas vingegaard - stage 21, tour de france 2024 // jonas vingegaard - stage 11, tour de france 2024 // vingegaard exhausted after tour de france: may cut season short - sjoerd valkering // jonas vingegaard and tadej pogacar - stage 20, tour de france 2024 (belga images) // the thing is - ellen bass // "if you had told me four months ago that i would be second, i wouldn't have believed you" - jonas vingegaard disappointed but proud of his tour de france - ondrej zhasil // jonas vingegaard and tadej pogacar - stage 11, tour de france 2024 // jonas vingegaard - stage 11, tour de france 2024 post-race interview (nbc sports) // alfred lord tennyson // jonas vingegaard and tadej pogacar - stage 11, tour de france 2024 // remco evenepoel and jonas vingegaard - stage 21, tour de france 2024 // jonas vingegaard and tadej pogacar - tour de france 2024 // matteo jorgenson and jonas vingegaard - stage 19, tour de france 2024 // matteo jorgenson and jonas vingegaard - tour de france 2024 // jonas vingegaard and tadej pogacar - podium ceremony, tour de france 2024 // jonas vingegaard and wout van aert - tour de france 2024 (team visma | lease a bike)
#obligatory jonasposting#i don’t know if i got the vibe i wanted to capture?? i feel like watching jonas race this year has ultimately been about hope#like the entire thing at its core feels like a leap of faith- of course visma was obsessively running numbers behind the scenes and#trying to prepare him as well as possible#but in the end he still hadn’t raced since april. he still had less than half the preparation and a massive question mark was following#them to the startline#but he still came. and he still believed. and everyone around him believed beyond everything else-#staff. commentators. fans. everyone was holding their breath because they don’t know where to place their bets#so it all comes down to crossing your fingers every time he gets a mechanical. saying a prayer under your breath when he loses 30 seconds.#and then stage 11 comes along! the tension is suddenly resolved and it’s like seeing the sun again!#but then things start to go downhill- but everyone still keeps hoping. the commentators i was watching were still saying “if” instead of#“when” about his podium in stage 21 because despite everything people still had hope! they don’t want to lay down the hammer#and even when he still finished second#the grief still mingled with the wonderful and beautiful fact that he still did it!#you take a step back and against all odds jonas vingegaard came back from the brink of death and podiumed the fucking tour de france!#and that heartbreak and wonder can coexist. you didn’t hope for nothing. the sky is still blue. the sun still shines. he made it.#sorry long tag rant i’m a yapper at heart y’all#me reading or listening to anything ever rn: omg this is so jonas coded!!!#jonas vingegaard#jv#tadej pogacar#remco evenepoel#wout van aert#wva#matteo jorgenson#tdf#tdf 2024#tour de france 2024#tour de france#cycling
87 notes · View notes
karmas-void · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
We disco in da lysium, shit’s real here
References:
Tumblr media
90 notes · View notes
Text
Tell me why I want to write a fic where the iwtv characters go to therapy and process their trauma… it’s because I’m a therapist isn’t it? I think about each character’s specific trauma and start treatment planning lol. The art therapist in me is so curious to see what sort of latent content emerges in traumatized vampire art…
Question is would I write it from the character’s POV or from the therapist’s? And if the vampires are unpacking their trauma and revealing their nature to said therapist, does the therapist get to live?
Anyway… should I write this? If I were to write it should I put all of them in therapy or just pick one traumatized vampire??? If I do decide to do this any suggestions are welcome lol
61 notes · View notes
bethanydelleman · 6 months
Note
Hello!
I liked your post about Anne de Bourgh probably just being sick, and another question came to my mind with regard to her.
I am quite astonished to see, that in a lot of JAFF, when he can't get Elizabeth, Darcy marries Anne de Bourgh. Usually there is some hidden motivation behind that: for example she is pregnant and he wants to save her reputation, or he wants to give her an opportunity to escape from Lady Catherine (relying on the non-canon assumption, that Anne is suffering under her mother's care) etc. For me it is a big question whether Darcy would marry her under any circumstances, and I am curious to hear your opinion about that. I always love your thoughtful answers!
Thanks
This question is in reference to this post.
As a general rule, I think that if Darcy meant to marry Anne de Bourgh, he would have already done it. So no, I don't think he'd marry her.
Anne's age is unclear, but the cradles line implies that she and Darcy are close in age, which is around twenty-eight. That isn't terribly old for Darcy, but it is for Anne if she's expecting to produce some children. I do think Anne being around Darcy's age makes sense, because it makes Lady Catherine more desperate. She's probably been previously thinking to herself, "Darcy is enjoying his youth, lots of time to marry" but now the deadline is feeling near and she's starting to wonder when Darcy will do his duty... (because obviously he's not going to squelch on her, right? RIGHT?)
Often I'll see in JAFF Darcy giving up on love after Elizabeth and marrying Anne out of duty, but that seems out of character to me. There are lots of women out there, I feel like Darcy would just try again. He's only twenty-eight, he can find someone else he loves! I really think that before he met Elizabeth at Pemberley, he was planning on doing just that. He thought it was over.
As for saving Anne from her mother, which I don't think is a real concern, there are other ways to do that if Darcy really thought it was a problem. He could invite Anne for a visit to Pemberley or his house in London. He could talk to his uncle, who would have more standing to talk to his sister about it. But it's unlikely he would see this as his duty or even as something he interfere with. Lady Catherine is Anne's mother, he is the nephew, it's not his place. Those hierarchies were very important in that era.
If Anne were pregnant or something... this one bothers me so much! It's SO OUT OF CHARACTER! Darcy cares about Pemberley, he would not want some random kid as his possible heir! If he has already rejected Anne as a suitable wife, why would he accept her now that she is "ruined"? If he really cares about Anne, he could find her a suitable husband with his money, power, and connections, he doesn't have to marry her himself. And again, this isn't his problem. This is Lady Catherine's responsibility.
(Not to mention how freaking misogynistic it is for JAFF to imply that Lady Catherine is so incompetent that Darcy has to help her run her estate. Women can run their own freaking estates!!!)
So to sum up: No, Darcy would not marry Anne, under any circumstances. Maybe if Lady Catherine kidnapped Georgiana and held her for ransom. (Don't write that, I beg of you)
53 notes · View notes
black-dahlias-blog · 11 months
Text
Just finished What We Do In The Shadows today…
Feeling fanart-ish, question mark.
Tumblr media
61 notes · View notes
asofterepilogue · 3 months
Note
Qu’est ce que vous trouvez à melechon ? Et qu’est ce que vous pouvez critiquer chez lui ? (Ce n’est pas une critique, c’est juste que je suis jeune et que je ne connais pas bien son parcours) qu’est-ce qui fait de lui un grand homme politique ? Merciii
C'est difficile de décrire ce que je pense de Mélenchon sans parler aussi de la dimension émotions plus personnelle 😅 Est-ce que tu étais assez grande en 2012 pour suivre la campagne ?
J'avais 17 ans, mes parents avaient voté Arlette Laguiller toute ma vie sans jamais militer et sans vraiment y croire, ma seule éducation politique c'était mon expérience personnelle de fille d'immigré pauvre et les discussions très générales de ma famille. Quand on a allumé la télé ce printemps là et qu'on a écouté Mélenchon parler avec autant de conviction de ce que pourraient être nos vies, ça a été une révélation. Il y avait quelqu'un, quelqu'un qui était même parfois pris au sérieux, qui dénonçait ce que je haïssais et proposait de le changer. Qui le disait avec passion, sans faire les simagrées du PS, sans refuser de prendre position, en argumentant rigoureusement, parfois avec des références à des livres que je pouvais lire, souvent sans insulter l'intelligence de son public, en faisant des liens que d'autres avaient sans doute fait avant mais jamais là où je pouvais les entendre. J'avais toujours connu la gauche faiblarde, traîtresse, dont on ne pouvait attendre qu'un sursis. Pour moi c'était vote "utile" pour le PS et affiliés, ou vote complètement inutile mais cohérent pour l'extrême-gauche, sans autre possibilité, sans espoir. Et là il y avait autre chose. C'est pas par conviction que l'autre flanby a balbutié son fameux "mon véritable adversaire, c'est la finance" - c'est parce que l'aile gauche de la gauche lui soufflait dans le cou. J'ai entrevu autre chose pour la première fois, et un autre chose qui semblait même assez directement atteignable. J'ai imprimé des tracts en douce avec l'imprimante familiale et séché des cours pour les distribuer - gros acte de rébellion pour moi à l'époque. J'étais sûre que ça allait arriver, en 2012 ou la fois d'après, ça ne pouvait qu'arriver.
Je ne vais pas faire semblant que tout ça n'influence pas mon opinion de Mélenchon. Évidemment que ce souvenir m'encourage toujours à être un peu plus indulgente.
Mais je crois aussi sincèrement que le projet qu'il défend est un projet qui nous rapprocherait d'un monde plus juste.
Impossible de séparer Mélenchon du LFI, alors parlons de ça. Je ne vais pas refaire le programme, mais c'est le seul qui propose une alternative avec un plan d'action concret et plus ou moins immédiat. Et j'ai peut-être tort mais, si LFI ne propose pas en soi de sortir du capitalisme, j'ai toujours pensé que sortir du capitalisme serait plus facile avec le modèle que propose LFI qu'avec le modèle actuel. J'ai parfois même encore la naïveté de penser que c'est le but final, juste à horizon très lointain.
Toutes les critiques que je pourrais faire sur Mélenchon ou LFI, je peux les faire sur la plupart des autres personnalités et partis politiques.
Je trouve leur ligne sur les droits des femmes très faible (mon plus gros problème ; malheureusement pas plus faible qu'ailleurs), j'aimerais qu'ils se battent ouvertement pour la mise à mort du capitalisme (comme je le disais, certaines de leurs positions me laissent penser qu'ils n'y sont pas opposés, mais si c'est le cas il faut être plus clair, et si ce n'est pas le cas c'est une déception ; mais là encore, à moins de regarder vers l'extrême-gauche, ils remettent plus en cause le système capitaliste que les autres partis), et je pense qu'ils passent un peu trop de temps sur certains sujets qui n'ont pas lieu d'être ou qui n'aident pas sur un plan purement stratégique (mais c'est aussi le climat actuel qui veut ça).
En ce qui concerne Mélenchon lui-même, il s'emporte parfois trop. C'est la principale critique qu'on peut lui faire, et qui lui est faite d'ailleurs à longueur de journée. Mais est-ce que c'est le plus important ? Lors de ses interventions, il est la plupart du temps posé malgré les interruptions intempestives et la mauvaise foi chronique de ses interlocuteurs. N'importe qui finirait par s'énerver !
Quant à ses "phrases polémiques", que dire ? On lui a récemment reproché d'avoir dit que l'antisémitisme est résiduel en France. Sans rentrer dans le commentaire de texte, les mots qu'il a employés exactement sont "l'antisémitisme reste résiduel". "Reste" ; or il n'a jamais, à ma connaissance, nié l'Holocauste, donc le sens le plus probable de "résiduel" ici est bien "qui persiste de quelque chose en dépit de tentatives faites pour l'éliminer". Étant donné l'autre sens du mot et la malhonnêteté ambiante, il aurait dû choisir un autre mot, mais de là à utiliser cette phrase comme preuve d'un antisémitisme débridé... On sait tous de toute façon que le problème ici ce n'est pas un quelconque antisémitisme à gauche, mais le refus de LFI de soutenir à 100% le génocide qu'Israël mène contre les Palestiniens.
La vérité c'est que même les sorties les plus stupides de Mélenchon passeraient inaperçues dans la bouche d'une autre personnalité politique. Le problème ce n'est pas vraiment ce qu'il dit, ou comment il le dit, mais c'est qu'il est le chef de file du parti qui a le plus de chances d'ébranler la dictature de la bourgeoisie en France. S'il se retirait, la prochaine tête de liste serait accueillie exactement de la même manière.
Ni LFI ni Mélenchon lui-même ne sont parfaits, mais si l'on admet qu'ils sont généralement de bonne foi, pourquoi ne pas essayer de les pousser à mieux au lieu de tout condamner ? Ils ont déjà changé d'avis sur certains sujets, ils peuvent le faire encore. Il y a des différences entre le monde qu'ils dessinent et celui que je désire, mais ils ne sont pas si incompatibles qu'il faille tout balayer.
Bref, je n'aime pas trop parler de "grand homme politique" pour plein de raisons (ça a aucun sens, on y met tout et rien, etc.), mais on peut lui reconnaître qu'il n'a pas vacillé malgré un acharnement politique et médiatique de plus en plus intolérable, qu'il a redonné de l'espoir à une grande partie des électeurs de gauche qui ne croyaient plus (2012, j'étais loin d'être la seule, et après la catastrophe Hollande encore plus), et qu'il est vraiment très bon orateur.
16 notes · View notes
d1sc01nf3rn0 · 1 year
Text
Of all the dumb things the cishet men in the fanbase of Disco Elysium could say, I never expected "Dora Ingerlund is bad cause she had an abortion" to be one of them.
Which is weird, cause I feel like I also should've expected them to believe such nonsense lmao.
54 notes · View notes
laniidae-passerine · 2 months
Text
the jojo siwa and the vampire lestat fandoms would have crazy beef btw
8 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 10 months
Text
Any judgement on (Richard III)’s reign has to be seen as provisional. The critic of the reign only has to consider how the Tudors would now be regarded if Henry VII lost at Stoke, to realize the dangers of too many assumptions about the intractability of Richard’s problems. But it would be equally unrealistic to ignore Richard’s unpopularity altogether. The fact that he generated opposition among men with little material reason for dissent, and that the disaffection then continued to spread among his own associates, says something about what contemporaries regarded as the acceptable parameters of political behaviour. There is no doubt that Richard’s deposition of his nephews was profoundly shocking. To anyone who did not accept the pre-contract story, which was probably the majority of observers, the usurpation was an act of disloyalty. Gloucester, both as uncle and protector, was bound to uphold his nephew’s interests and his failure to do so was dishonourable. Of all medieval depositions, it was the only one which, with whatever justification, could most easily be seen as an act of naked self-aggrandizement.
It was also the first pre-emptive deposition in English history. This raised enormous problems. Deposition was always a last resort, even when it could be justified by the manifest failings of a corrupt or ineffective regime. How could one sanction its use as a first resort, to remove a king who had not only not done anything wrong but had not yet done anything at all?
-Rosemary Horrox, Richard III: A Study of Service
#richard iii#my post#english history#Imo this is what really stands out to me the most about Richard's usurpation#By all accounts and precedents he really shouldn't have had a problem establishing himself as King#He was the de-facto King from the beginning (the king he usurped was done away with and in any case hadn't even ruled);#He was already well-known and respected in the Yorkist establishment (ie: he wasn't an 'outsider' or 'rival' or from another family branch)#and there was no question of 'ins VS outs' in the beginning of his reign because he initially offered to preserve the offices and positions#for almost all his brother's servants and councilors - merely with himself as their King instead#Richard himself doesn't seem to have actually expected any opposition to his rule and he was probably right in this expectation#Generally speaking the nobility and gentry were prepared to accept the de-facto king out of pragmatism and stability if nothing else#You see it pretty clearly in Henry VII's reign and Edward IV's reign (especially his second reign once the king he usurped was finally#done away with and he finally became the de-facto king in his own right)#I'm sure there were people who disliked both Edward and Henry for usurpations but that hardly matters -#their acceptance was pragmatic not personal#That's what makes the level of opposition to Richard so striking and startling#It came from the very people who should have by all accounts accepted his rule however resigned or hateful that acceptance was#But they instead turned decisively against him and were so opposed to his rule that they were prepared to support an exiled and obscure*#Lancastrian claimant who could offer them no manifest advantage rather than give up opposition when they believed the Princes were dead#It's like Horrox says -#The real question isn't why Richard lost at Bosworth; its why Richard had to face an army at all - an army that was *Yorkist* in motivation#He divided his own dynasty and that is THE defining aspect of his usurpation and his reign. Discussions on him are worthless without it#It really puts a question on what would have happened had he won Bosworth. I think he had a decent chance of success but at the same time#Pretenders would've turned up and they would have been far more dangerous with far more internal support than they had been for Henry#Again - this is what makes his usurpation so fascinating to me. I genuinely do find him interesting as a historical figure in some ways#But his fans instead fixate on a fictional version of him they've constructed in their heads instead#(*obscure from a practical perspective not a dynastic one)#queue
27 notes · View notes
flansuki3 · 1 year
Text
Short fan fic about Yuri Betraying Makarov
It's not like you're going to read this letter anyway, and it's not like you want to read it after all.
By now you may be wondering why I decided to do what I did to you.
I guess is because it's the only thing I know how to do: be a good boy.
From the moment I met you I admired you, you were the perfect man in my eyes and... then we became friends. That was your worst mistake, you know?
All my life I was always just one more, a normal man among thousands. Even for our cause I never stood out more than others, the fact that I caught your attention to win your friendship still seems a mystery to me.
So all my life I've had this inferiority complex and when I started to walk by your side this complex got worse.
How could it be otherwise? You know very well what kind of man you are and you always made the most of it.
You are perfect.
Your eyes are already a genetic lottery, but that face and body of yours could have made you a recognized model and you even steal men's looks. I, on the other hand, was never very attractive and never had any luck with women.
You always stood out for being intelligent, despite not having grown up with any privilege you managed to make a fortune. I, on the other hand, used to lie to myself saying "Better to have nothing than to do wrong". The truth is that the money Zakhaev gave me that day he lost his arm I spent it on nonsense. Needless to say, I was never very smart.
But there was something where I beat you, where I even felt I could humiliate you a little:
Being a good boy.
It wasn't something difficult, it was simply doing nothing, someone useless who doesn't move can be passed off as a angel if compared to another extremely violent and cold-minded person.
I should have been content with the blessings Imran Zakhaev had given me, even if I spent all my money (which I did) Imran would simply give me more.
But power corrupts.
I felt an unhealthy pleasure every time Zakhaev stopped you from crossing the line of villainy and without being aware of your suffering compared you to me.
"Why can't you be more like Yuri, he is calm and not greedy."
And yet you never hated me, on the contrary you calmed down a lot and tried hard to change and control your violent impulses.
Gradually I came to hate you and I hated more that you still trusted me, that you placed all your friendship and kindness in me. It's not like I was such a good liar that you didn't realize that I didn't like you very much, so you're probably an idiot or you wanted to have faith in me.
But in the end it doesn't matter, all this crap letter, all my thoughts about you or what you think about me.
In the end I will be able to heal from this inferiority complex. After all there is one thing I will always be better at than you: being a good boy. If neither you nor Russia want to give me that title then I can look for it elsewhere.
That's what I do best.
23 notes · View notes
juliedrawz · 1 year
Text
Just a quick info for those who'd been asking me when my book will be finished.
Tumblr media
Even though I can't give you an exact date, I really strive to finish it by the end of next year [ 2024] That's because I'm not giving myself a timelimit. Also because I travel a lot ✈️ and do some other creative projects.
How will you be able to get the book once it's done?
I will make a post and everyone who will want a copy just needs to write me and then decide if they want the physical hardcover one or the E-book.
What exactly is the book about again?
Well, Coco. Generally speaking. Or better said, it's a veeeerrryyyy very detailed mix of a prequel and a sequel 😂 The very main characters are Héctor and Ernesto, then Imelda and Ceci. Second comes Miguel and a few of my Oc's.
The book beginns where the movie stopped. In the middle you'll get to read a lot about the past of the beloved squad. There are also seperate parts that focus on one or two characters specifically. Ernesto for example.
The second half of my book will have a 3 to 4 years jump into the future. This time Miguel's little sister manages to get herself cursed to the other side and so he and Sara (I already introduced her) follow to get her back. This will also eventually lead us to the big climax of the whole story and the ending. (The ending which won't really be an ending either but much rather a new beginning 😉)
Actually, there is SO much going on in my book, I can't tell everything here. Not to forget it would be a spoiler.
What are the themes/topics targeted in the novel?
Trauma/Ptsd, violence and abuse, human psyche, loss, hurt/grief, healing, romance/Love (soulmates, one true love) friendship, forgiveness, family relationships, faith etc.
(This is basically one of the big WHY'S my book is not for children but for older teens/adults 😅🫴) you will have mild spice here and there, yes, but if you expect detailed stuff, sorry amigo 🫡 that's not my territory.
What will be the litte "addings" ?
Since I was totally free to bring my very own ideas and thoughts into my novel, I spent some good amount of time building up and exploring the world of the Land of the dead and all it's magical possibilities even further🤗 I wanted the movie to feel like the last marveling gaze you take at the glittering ocean and the horizon, and the big breath you take before diving down to the big colorful coral reef with thousands of beautiful fish.
💔⚠️The book isn't for you if:
You don't like the concept of soulmates and one true love.
You don't like exploring deeper topics
You don't like redemption arks
If you're very sensitive to strong topics such as PTSD
You're not a fan of Ernesto
If you expect smut/ premarital sex
Can't accept the fact that I bring my christian faith into the story and writing fantasy fiction my way.
🎉❤️ The book's for you if :
You love slow burn romance
Believe in one true love - soulmates
Love Fluff
Love deeper topics
You can't get enough of Imector 💞
You are in for drama
You can handle teasing of your heartstrings
26 notes · View notes
bootlegraccoons · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
wip ><
22 notes · View notes
blueiight · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Coming slowly to know his evil, or being catapulted into it ... was all the same. I wanted none of it finally. And, deserving nothing better, I closed up like a spider in the flame of a match. And even Armand who was my constant companion, and my only companion, existed at a great distance from me, beyond that veil which separated me from all living things, a veil which was a form of shroud. (IWTV, 1976)
26 notes · View notes
nightcolorz · 2 years
Text
Currently thinking about how Anne Rice has expressed that Lestat is a reflection in many ways of the type of person she wished she could be and how she didn’t understand gender + didn’t entirely identify with womanhood, and how all of those feelings are a part of Gabrielle’s character, down to Gabrielle basically saying to Lestat that she loves him because she sees the type of man she can’t be reflected in him and I just…Im not the biggest fan of Anne Rice as a person, she was definitely very flawed (that may be an understatement), but I feel bad that she seemed to have had some unaddressed gender dysphoria, and never really got to explore her gender in a way that she found satisfactory. Based on how she’s spoken about it it seems like she didn’t consider exploring her gender identity to be a possibility. And honestly I find that really sad
37 notes · View notes
jorvikzelda · 1 year
Text
Swish as a payment option no matter how expensive your purchase is is so fucking wild. Ah yes let me just pull out my phone to swish you thirteen thousand kronor, Online Store, that sounds completely reasonable
#yes I'm buying a laptop yes it's 10 pm yes I'm getting up at 6:30 tomorrow to sit on a train all day#It's not actually even in stock right now (beställningsvara as they say) so I'm going to have to wait for it until mid september#estimated delivery day is a thursday. home of phobia why isn't it an update day :/#z talks#not horse game#yes I'm dropping thirteen thousand kronor on a laptop do NOT QUESTION ME#Syndar faktiskt o väljer klarna som betalningsalternativ#inte eftersom jg inte har råd (det har jag med Marginal annars hade jag EJ gjort detta)#men jag var fan förberedd på att inte köpa dator förrän black friday inte att det skulle va sån här jävla rea NU#och jag vill av orosskäl vänta tills jag får mitt FUCKING CSN innan jag faktiskt betalar#Om det nu går lmao. Men alltså. De måste fan behandla min ansökan snart ?!?!??!?!??!???#Oroar mig (ej av rationella skäl obv) för att jag ska få avslag på hela skiten och då står jag hellre med en obetald faktura som är aslätt#att annullera än hela summan jag SKULLE fått i csn draget från mitt konto redan och behöva vänta på återbetalning#Detta särskilt iom att det är en Beställningsvara hallå jag vill inte betala NU för något ni har SEN#anyway. Så rättfärdigar jag min klarnasynd.#Full respekt till dig om du klarar att betala så mycket pengar på direkten men min pengaångest could never#Also lowkey glad att den nt är tillgänglig from I Morgon för nu har jag tid att skaffa en drulleförsäkring lmao#Insåg att det in fact INTE ingår i hemförsäkringen och så kan jag helt ärligt inte ha det med en alldeles för dyr dator#Ja den är billigare än min ipad som jag haft sedan 2020 UTAN drulleförsäkring nej jag tänker inte rationellt#Ja detta är 100% för att jag inte hade klarat skammen att ha sönder datorn in addition to skammen det innebär att köpa en dyr dator#Typ bara för att kunna gamea på den (gaming ses NED på i familjen jag är väldigt skamsen om att vara Gamer)#(you will Not catch me talking about Gaming at dinner)#Ok nu ska jag gå och bekräfta beställningen och sen ska jag SOVA
7 notes · View notes