#US Customs and Border Protection

[allthecanadianpolitics]

A B.C. mom is pleading for help after her daughter was detained in the United States over an incomplete visa. Alexis Eagles, of Abbotsford, said her 35-year-old daughter Jasmine Mooney entered the U.S. at the San Ysidro border crossing between Mexico and San Diego on March 3 with an incomplete application for a Trade NAFTA work visa. She said U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers arrested Mooney and she spent three nights in the detention centre. Mooney has not been charged with any crime and does not have a criminal record, she said.

Continue reading

Tagging: @newsfromstolenland

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Lauren Aratani at The Guardian:

A Brown University medical professor was deported to Lebanon over the weekend despite having a valid US work visa, defying a judge’s order blocking her immediate removal from the country. The case centering on Rasha Alawieh, 34, comes as Donald Trump’s second presidential administration has been escalating its immigration policies and attacking universities. On Sunday, the US deported more than 250 immigrants, allegedly members of a Venezuelan and Salvadorian gang, to El Salvador despite a judge’s order halting the flights. Alawieh was detained at Boston’s Logan international airport on Thursday after a trip to Lebanon to visit family. Her cousin, Yara Chehab, filed a lawsuit soon after in Massachusetts federal court on her behalf. On Friday, US district court judge Leo Sorokin issued an order scheduling a hearing for Alawieh on Monday – and said that the federal government must give 48 hours’ notice to the court before her removal from the country. That hearing, however, was delayed at the request of an attorney for Chehab after other lawyers representing Chehab withdrew from the case, citing “further diligence”, as CNN reported. No other details were immediately available. Nonetheless, in clear defiance of Sorokin’s order from Friday, US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) put Alawieh on a flight to Paris that presumably was a layover back to Lebanon. On Sunday, Sorokin said in court documents that CBP had received notice of the court order but “nonetheless thereafter willfully disobeyed the order by sending [Alawieh] out of the United States”. Sorokin ordered the government to respond to the “serious allegations with a legal and factual response” and a description of their version of events by Monday morning, ahead of a scheduled court hearing. CBP did not immediately respond to the Guardian’s request for comment. In a comment to Reuters, a CBP spokesperson said that officers “adhere to strict protocols to identify and stop threats” and the burden is on people to establish admissibility into the US. In a statement, a Brown spokesperson said that the university was “seeking to learn more about what has happened, but we need to be careful about sharing information publicly about any individual’s personal circumstances”. Brown noted that Alawieh had a clinical appointment with the university but was an employee of Brown Medicine, a non-profit that is affiliated with the medical school but is not operated by the university.

[...] Alawieh’s removal also comes at a time when the Trump administration has targeted universities, particularly Columbia University, after the series of pro-Palestinian protests it saw in 2024.

Brown University medical professor Rasha Alawieh’s deportation, despite a judge ordering against such deportations, is yet more lawlessness from Tyrant 47.

See Also:

HuffPost: Brown University Professor Deported Despite Valid Visa And Judge's Order

[journosatyam]

travel-to-america-cbp-officer-will-check-your-phone-laptop

अमेरिका जाने वाले सावधान, एयरपोर्ट पर फोन और लैपटॉप भी चेक हो सकता है

अमेरिका में राष्ट्रपति डोनाल्ड ट्रंप की सरकार बनने के बाद से ही अमेरिका में लगातार इमिग्रेशन नियमों में बदलाव किए जा रहे हैं. एक तरफ वीजा नियम कड़े कर दिए गए हैं तो दूसरी तरफ अमेरिका आने वाले यात्रियों के लिए नए ट्रेवल एडवाइजरी जारी हो गए हैं. कस्टम्स एंड बॉर्डर प्रोटेक्शन (CBP) अधिकारी आपके फोन, लैपटॉप तक को चेक कर सकते हैं. ऐसे में अगर आप अमेरिका जाने का प्लान कर रहे हैं तो इन बातों को गांठ बांध लें नहीं तो लेने के देने पड़ जाएंगे. अगर आप अमेरिका ट्रैवल की प्लानिंग करते हैं तो CBP अधिकारियों को आपके फोन, लैपटॉप और अन्य इलेक्ट्रॉनिक डिवाइस की जांच करने का अधिकार है. यह तलाशी बिना किसी वांरट या विशेष कारण के हो सकती है और यह सभी यात्रियों पर लागू होगी, चाहे वे वीजा धारक, ग्रीन कार्ड धारक या अमेरिकी नागरिक ही क्यों न हों.

पूरा आर्टिकल यहां पढ़ें👇 

अमेरिका जाने वाले सावधान, एयरपोर्ट पर फोन और लैपटॉप भी चेक हो सकता है

[xtruss]

Breaking News From Canada: Why Growing Concerns Over US Border Searches of Electronic Devices Looming Travel Industry, Latest Update What Travelers Need to Know

— Sunday, April 13, 2025

Breaking news from Canada highlights the growing concerns over US border searches of electronic devices, raising alarms among travelers about their privacy rights and what’s at stake when crossing the border. With rising incidents of electronic device searches, the Canadian Government has issued a warning to its citizens, emphasizing that US Border Agents Have The Legal Authority To Inspect Your Electronic Devices Without Providing Any Explanation. This includes requests for passwords to access Phones, Laptops, Tablets, and Other Personal Devices.

As the frequency of these searches continues to increase, travelers are becoming more anxious about the implications for their privacy and the potential risks of having sensitive data exposed. With over 47,000 electronic device searches conducted by US Customs and Border Protection last year alone, it’s clear that border agents are increasingly focused on reviewing the contents of travelers’ devices. This has sparked widespread debate over how these searches may infringe on personal privacy and whether they are justified in the name of national security.

In this report, we break down the latest updates and provide travelers with essential information on what they need to know before embarking on their next journey through U.S. borders.

As global travel increases, so do the concerns over personal privacy and the government’s ability to access sensitive information. A recent advisory from the Canadian Government has raised alarms for travelers crossing the U.S. border, specifically regarding the routine searches of Electronic Devices such as Phones, Laptops, Tablets, and even Digital Cameras. Border agents, according to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), have the legal right to search your devices without providing any reason and can even request passwords to access your data.

These Searches are often Conducted Randomly or without suspicion of any wrongdoing, leading many to question how much privacy they have when Traveling Internationally. With thousands of device searches occurring annually, it’s essential for travelers to understand what types of searches may be conducted, who is at risk, and how they can protect their data.

This article dives into the Policies and Practices Surrounding Electronic Device searches at the U.S. border, highlighting the Growing Concerns Over Privacy, the implications for international travelers, and what you can do to safeguard your information while still complying with the law.

The Surge In Electronic Device Searches At U.S. Borders

In the past decade, the number of electronic device searches conducted by U.S. border agents has risen dramatically. According to data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, over 47,000 searches of electronic devices were carried out last year alone, marking a significant increase from previous years. The rise in searches is indicative of the Growing Tension between National Security Concerns and the Protection of Individual Privacy Rights. For many travelers, this surge in searches raises valid concerns about their personal data and the risks of having sensitive information accessed by border agents.

These searches are primarily categorized into two types: Basic and Advanced. Both types of searches, as Outlined By the U.S. CBP, allow officers to examine the contents of your electronic devices, but the procedures and circumstances under which each type is conducted differ significantly.

Understanding The Two Types of Border Searches

There are two main types of searches that can be conducted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at the border: Basic and Advanced Searches.

Basic Search: This is the more common and less intrusive type of search. A basic search typically involves a border agent scrolling through the contents of your phone or laptop, which may include E-Mails, Photos, Apps, Files, and other Data. No suspicion of Illegal Activity or Wrongdoing is required for a basic search to occur. This means that the agent may perform this search randomly or even based on their own Hunches or Biases, such as a Passenger’s Nationality, Appearance, or Travel History.

Advanced Search: An advanced search is More Intrusive and involves copying the data from a device for further analysis. This type of search is only allowed when there is “Reasonable Suspicion” that a traveler may be involved in illegal activities or if there is a Concern Related to National Security. However, the standard of Reasonable Suspicion Can Be Vague, leading to Potential Abuses or Excessive Scrutiny. In an advanced search, a senior officer or manager must approve the search before it can proceed. While this search is intended for more serious situations, it remains a Significant Invasion of Privacy for many travelers.

Who Is At Risk of A Device Search?

Given that U.S. border agents are entitled to search electronic devices without any formal warrant or specific cause, determining who is at risk of a search can be difficult. According to experts, including those from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), searches are not restricted to specific individuals but can be conducted randomly or based on the discretion of the border agents. However, certain factors may make a traveler more likely to be searched.

For instance, travelers originating from countries with high levels of terrorism, drug trafficking, or criminal activity may be more likely to face heightened scrutiny. Border agents may also be more likely to search the devices of travelers who have visited certain countries or have connections with individuals under investigation by law enforcement agencies.

Journalists, activists, and business professionals with sensitive information may also find themselves at greater risk of having their devices searched. Border agents may be looking for links to sources, contacts, or even political activities deemed suspicious by the authorities. Furthermore, travelers who seem evasive or unable to answer simple questions during the immigration process might draw more attention from agents, resulting in their devices being searched.

What Electronic Devices Can Be Searched?

While Smartphones and Laptops are the most commonly searched devices, U.S. Customs and Border Protection has the authority to inspect any Electronic Device a traveler may carry. This includes Tablets, Digital Cameras, External Hard Drives, USB Drives, and even Smartwatches. As digital technology continues to evolve, the range of devices that could be inspected at the border is likely to expand.

The EFF points out that travelers should be mindful of the vast array of devices they carry when crossing the border, as any item capable of storing data could be subject to search. This means that even a digital camera containing private photos, a smartwatch tracking personal health data, or a USB drive with business documents can be scrutinized by border agents without cause.

What Are The Risks of Device Searches?

The privacy risks of border searches are a significant concern for travelers. In addition to the potential for personal information to be accessed or copied, border searches can lead to the inadvertent release of sensitive or private data. Travelers who carry Work-Related Documents, Confidential Communications, or Personal Photos may be exposed to risks if their devices are searched. Furthermore, there is the possibility that information found on devices could be misused or leaked, potentially leading to legal or financial consequences.

Some travelers have also raised concerns about the way data is handled during the search. Since officers are authorized to copy data for analysis, there is always the risk that this information could be stored, reviewed, or shared beyond the borders of the inspection. For those in the Business or Media Fields, this could result in Breaches of Confidentiality, Intellectual Property Theft, or even damage to reputations.

Protecting Your Data During Border Searches

Although the legal framework around border device searches is still evolving, Travelers Can Take Some Basic Steps to Protect their Data. Here are a few strategies that might help Minimize the Risks:

Encrypt Your Data: Encrypting the contents of your device adds an extra layer of protection. If agents are unable to access your data without a password, they may be less likely to conduct a deeper search.

Limit the Data You Bring: Travelers can reduce their risk of exposure by limiting the sensitive data they carry. If possible, leave unnecessary documents, photos, or files at home.

Use Strong Passwords: Ensure that your devices are protected by strong, unique passwords to prevent unauthorized access.

Travel With Minimal Devices: Some travelers opt to leave their devices behind altogether and instead rely on cloud services or temporary devices. This limits the amount of personal data available for inspection.

Know Your Rights: Understand the laws surrounding device searches and know that, while U.S. border agents have the authority to search your device, they cannot search your device without limits. Travelers can refuse to comply with a search, but they should be aware that this may result in further scrutiny, delays, or even denied entry.

What Not To Do During A Border Search

While it might be tempting to erase or hide information from your device to avoid a search, experts warn that this could backfire. Border agents are trained to detect signs of tampering, and wiping a device or removing information could raise suspicion, leading to more invasive searches. Similarly, attempting to hide information or lie about the contents of your device can result in legal consequences, including fines or prosecution for obstruction.

Adult Aassengers 18 And Older Must Show Valid Identification At The Airport Checkpoint In Order To Travel.

Driver's licenses or other state photo identity cards issued by Department of Motor Vehicles (or equivalent)

Beginning May 7, 2025, if you plan to use your state-issued ID or license to fly within the U.S., make sure it is REAL ID compliant. If you are not sure if your ID complies with REAL ID, check with your state department of motor vehicles.

State-Issued Enhanced Driver's License

U.S. Passport

U.S. Passport Card

DHS Trusted Traveler Cards (Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST)

U.S. Department of Defense ID, including IDs Issued to Dependents

Permanent Resident Card

Border Crossing Card

An Acceptable Photo ID Issued By a Federally Recognized Tribal Nation/Indian Tribe, Including Enhanced Tribal Cards (ETCs).

HSPD-12 PIV Card

Foreign Government-Issued Passport

Canadian Provincial Driver's License or Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Card

Transportation Worker Identification Credential

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Employment Authorization Card (I-766)

U.S. Merchant Mariner Credential

Veteran Health Identification Card (VHIC)

Conclusion

As concerns about privacy and digital security grow, it’s crucial for international travelers to be aware of their rights and responsibilities when crossing U.S. borders. The rise in electronic device searches has sparked a wider conversation about balancing national security and individual privacy. While U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s right to search devices without a warrant may be legal, the increasing scrutiny of travelers’ digital lives raises significant privacy and security concerns. As travelers, it is essential to understand the policies around these searches and take steps to protect personal data when crossing international borders. The more informed travelers are about these processes, the better equipped they will be to safeguard their privacy while still complying with the law.

[theknightlywolfe]

Reminder: DO NOT SECURE YOUR MOBILE DEVICES WITH BIOMETRICS.

1) you can't change your biometrics

2) law enforcement or border patrol can use your biometrics to unlock your devices without your permission.

3) in many states you cannot be asked to provide your password, it requires a court order.

And seriously, I keep saying it, but people outside the US, it is not safe for you to come here. It's not even safe for US citizens here, it could get much for you.

[12babu]

Get you iPhone 16 Pro Now!

iPhone 16 Pro

[alyfoxxxen]

Brown professor, doctor held by customs officials at Boston airport after travel to Lebanon - The Brown Daily Herald

[queenstravelingdarling]

In 3 months and a few days. By the summer, who knows what fresh hell we will be living in. People chose hate over common decency and I will never forgive them.

[monetizeme]

In recent weeks, airport Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents have drawn public outcry for denying travelers US entry based on searches of their phones. A doctor on an H-1B visa was deported to Lebanon after CBP found “sympathetic photos and videos” of Hezbollah leaders. A French scientist was turned away after a device search unearthed messages criticizing the Trump administration’s cuts to research programs, which officers said “conveyed hatred of Trump” and “could be qualified as terrorism.” As the administration ratchets up pressure to turn away even legal immigrants, its justifications are becoming thinner and thinner — but travelers can still benefit from knowing what are supposed to be their legal rights.

Your ability to decline a search depends on your immigration status — and, in some cases, on where and how you’re entering the country. Courts across the country have issued different rulings on device searches at ports of entry. But no matter your situation, there are precautions you can take to safeguard your digital privacy.

CBP device searches have historically been relatively rare. During the 2024 fiscal year, less than 0.01 percent of arriving international travelers had their phones, computers, or other electronic devices searched by CBP, according to the agency. That year, CBP officers conducted 47,047 device searches. But even before this recent wave of incidents, inspections were on the rise: eight years earlier, during the 2016 fiscal year, CBP searched only 19,051 devices.

[trump-executive-orders]

Protecting the American People Against Invasion

Issued January 20, 2025.

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. Over the last 4 years, the prior administration invited, administered, and oversaw an unprecedented flood of illegal immigration into the United States. Millions of illegal aliens crossed our borders or were permitted to fly directly into the United States on commercial flights and allowed to settle in American communities, in violation of longstanding Federal laws.

Many of these aliens unlawfully within the United States present significant threats to national security and public safety, committing vile and heinous acts against innocent Americans. Others are engaged in hostile activities, including espionage, economic espionage, and preparations for terror-related activities. Many have abused the generosity of the American people, and their presence in the United States has cost taxpayers billions of dollars at the Federal, State, and local levels.

Enforcing our Nation's immigration laws is critically important to the national security and public safety of the United States. The American people deserve a Federal Government that puts their interests first and a Government that puts their interests first and a Government that understands its sacred obligation to prioritize the safety, security, and financial and economic well-being of Americans.

This order ensures that the Federal Government protects the American people by faithfully executing the immigration laws of the United States.

Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to faithfully execute the immigration laws against all inadmissible and removable aliens, particularly those aliens who threaten the safety or security of the American people. Further, it is the policy of the United States to achieve the total and efficient enforcement of those laws, including through lawful incentives and detention capabilities.

Sec. 3. Faithful Execution of the Immigration Laws. In furtherance of the policies described in section 2 of this order:

(a) Executive Order 13993 of January 20, 2021 (Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities), Executive Order 14010 of February 2, 2021 (Creating a Comprehensive Regional Framework To Address the Causes of Migration, To Manage Migration Throughout North and Central America, and To Provide Safe and Orderly Processing of Asylum Seekers at the United States Border), Executive Order 14011 of February 2, 2021 (Establishment of Interagency Task Force on the Reunification of Families), and Executive Order 14012 of February 2, 2021 (Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans) are hereby revoked; and

(b) Executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall take all appropriate action to promptly revoke all memoranda, guidance, or other policies based on the Executive Orders revoked in section 3(a) of this order and shall employ all lawful means to ensure the faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States against all inadmissible and removable aliens.

Sec. 4. Civil Enforcement Priorities. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall take all appropriate action to enable the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to set priorities for their agencies that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal. Further, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that the primary mission of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Homeland Security Investigations division is the enforcement of the provisions of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of aliens in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes in this order.

Sec. 5. Criminal Enforcement Priorities. The Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall take all appropriate action to prioritize the prosecution of criminal offenses related to the unauthorized entry or continued unauthorized presence of aliens in the United States.

Sec. 6. Federal Homeland Security Task Forces. (a) The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall take all appropriate action to jointly establish Homeland Security Task Forces (HSTFs) in all States nationwide.

(b) The composition of each HSTF shall be subject to the direction of the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, but shall include representation from any other Federal agencies with law enforcement officers, or agencies with the ability to provide logistics, intelligence, and operational support to the HSTFs, and shall also include representation from relevant State and local law enforcement agencies. The heads of all Federal agencies shall take all appropriate action to provide support to the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure that the HSTFs fulfill the objectives in subsection (c) of this section, and any other lawful purpose that fulfills the policy objectives of this order.

(c) The objective of each HSTF is to end the presence of criminal cartels, foreign gangs, and transnational criminal organizations throughout the United States, dismantle cross-border human smuggling and trafficking networks, end the scourge of human smuggling and trafficking, with a particular focus on such offenses involving children, and ensure the use of all available law enforcement tools to faithfully execute the immigration laws of the United States.

(d) The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall take all appropriate action to provide an operational command center to coordinate the activities of the HSTFs and provide such support as they may require, and shall also take all appropriate action to provide supervisory direction to their activities as may be required.

Sec. 7. Identification of Unregistered Illegal Aliens. The Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, shall take all appropriate action to:

(a) Immediately announce and publicize information about the legal obligation of all previously unregistered aliens in the United States to comply with the requirements of part VII of subchapter II or chapter 12 of title 8, United States Code;

(b) Ensure that all previously unregistered aliens in the United States comply with the requirements of part VII of subchapter II of chapter 12 of title 8, United States Code; and

(c) Ensure that failure to comply with the legal obligations of part VII of subchapter II of chapter 12 of title 8, United States Code, is treated as a civil and criminal enforcement priority.

Sec. 8. Civil Fines and Penalties. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Treasury, shall take all appropriate action to ensure the assessment and collection of all fines and penalties that the Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized by law to assess and collect from aliens unlawfully present in the United States, including aliens who unlawfully entered or unlawfully attempted to enter the United States, and from those who facilitate such aliens' presence in the United States.

(b) Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a report to the President regarding their progress implementing the requirements of this section and recommending any additional actions that may need to be taken to achieve its objectives.

Sec. 9. Efficient Removals of Recent Entrants and Other Aliens. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall take all appropriate action, pursuant to section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii)(I) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(A)(iii)(I)), to apply, in her sole and unreviewable discretion, the provisions of section 235(b)(1)(A)(i) and (ii) of the INA to the aliens designated under section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii)(II). Further, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall promptly take appropriate action to use all other provisions of the immigration laws or any other Federal law, including, but not limited to sections 238 and 240(d) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1228 and 1229a(d)), to ensure the efficient and expedited removal of aliens from the United States.

Sec. 10. Detention Facilities. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall promptly take all appropriate action and allocate all legally available resources or establish contracts to construct, operate, control, or use facilities to detain removable aliens. The Secretary of Homeland Security, further, shall take all appropriate actions to ensure the detention of aliens apprehended for violations of immigration law pending the outcome of their removal proceedings or their removal from the country, to the extent permitted by law.

Sec. 11. Federal-State Agreements. To ensure State and local law enforcement agencies across the United States can assist with the protection of the American people, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, and with the consent of State or local officials as appropriate, take appropriate action, through agreements under section 287(g) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1357(g)) or otherwise, to authorize State and local law enforcement officials, as the Secretary of Homeland Security determines are qualified and appropriate, to perform the functions of immigration officers in relation to the investigation, apprehension, or detention of aliens in the United States under the direction and the supervision of the Secretary of Homeland Security. Such authorization shall be in addition to, rather than in place of, Federal performance of these duties. To the extent permitted by law, the Secretary of Homeland Security may structure each agreement under section 287(g) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1357(g)) in the manner that provides the most effective model for enforcing Federal immigration laws in that jurisdiction.

Sec. 12. Encouraging Voluntary Compliance with the Law. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall take all appropriate action, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, and subject to adequate safeguards, assurances, bonds, and any other lawful measure, to adopt policies and procedures to encourage aliens unlawfully in the United States to voluntarily depart as soon as possible, including through enhanced usage of the provisions of section 240B of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1229c), international agreements or assistance, or any other measures that encourage aliens unlawfully in the United States to depart as promptly as possible, including through removals of aliens as provided by section 250 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1260).

Sec. 13. Recalcitrant Countries. The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall take all appropriate action to:

(a) Cooperate and effectively implement, as appropriate, the sanctions provided by section 243(d) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1253(d)), with the Secretary of State, to the maximum extent permitted by law, ensuring that diplomatic efforts and negotiations with foreign states include the foreign states' acceptance of their nationals who are subject to removal from the United States; and

(b) Eliminate all documentary barriers, dilatory tactics, or other restrictions that prevent the prompt repatriation of aliens to any foreign state. Any failure or delay by a foreign state shall be considered in carrying out subsection (a) this section, and shall also be considered regarding the issuance of any other sanctions that may be available to the United States.

Sec. 14. Visa Bonds. The Secretary of Treasury shall take all appropriate action, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, to establish a system to facilitate the administration of all bonds that the Secretary of State o the Secretary of Homeland Security may lawfully require to administer the provisions of the INA.

Sec. 15. Reestablishment of the VOICE Office and Addressing Victims of Crimes Committed by Removable Aliens. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall direct the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to take all appropriate and lawful action to reestablish within ICE an office to provide proactive, timely, adequate, and professional services to victims of crimes committed by removable aliens, and those victims' family members. The Attorney General shall also ensure that the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3771 are followed in all Federal prosecutions involving crimes committed by removable aliens.

Sec. 16. Addressing Actions by the Previous Administration. The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall promptly take all appropriate action, consistent with law, to rescind the policy decisions of the previous administration that led to the increased or continued presence of illegal aliens in the United States, and align any and all departmental activities with the policies set out by this order and the immigration laws. Such action should include, but is not limited to:

(a) ensuring that the parole authority under section 212(d)(5) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) is exercised on only a case-by-case basis in accordance with the plain language of the statute, and in all circumstances only when an individual alien demonstrates urgent humanitarian reasons or a significant public benefit derived from their particular continued presence in the United States arising from such parole;

(b) ensuring that designations of Temporary Protected Status are consistent with the provisions of section 244 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1254a), and that such designations are appropriately limited in scope and made for only so long as may be necessary to fulfill the textual requirements of that statute; and

(c) ensuring that employment authorization is provided in a manner consistent with section 274A of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1324a), and that employment authorization is not provided to any unauthorized alien in the United States.

Sec. 17. Sanctuary Jurisdictions. The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, to the maximum extent possible under law, evaluate and undertake any lawful actions to ensure that so-called "sanctuary" jurisdictions, which seek to interfere with the lawful exercise of Federal law enforcement operations, do not receive access to Federal funds. Further, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall evaluate and undertake any other lawful actions, criminal or civil, that they deem warranted based on any such jurisdiction's practices that interfere with the enforcement of Federal law.

Sec. 18. Information Sharing. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall promptly issue guidance to ensure maximum compliance by Department of Homeland Security personnel with the provisions of 8 U.S.C. 1373 and 8 U.S.C. 1644 and ensure that State and local governments are provided with the information necessary to fulfill law enforcement, citizenship, or immigration status verification requirements authorized by law; and

(b) The Attorney General, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall take all appropriate action to stop the trafficking and smuggling of alien children into the United States, including through the sharing of any information necessary to assist in the achievement of that objective.

Sec. 19. Funding Review. The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall:

(a) Immediately review and, if appropriate, audit all contracts, grants, or other agreements providing Federal funding to non-governmental organizations supporting or providing services, either directly or indirectly, to removable or illegal aliens, to ensure that such agreements conform to applicable law and are free of waste, fraud, and abuse, and that they do not promote or facilitate violations of our immigration laws;

(b) Pause distribution of all further funds pursuant to such agreements pending the results of the review in subsection (a) of this section;

(c) Terminate all such agreements determined to be in violation of law or to be sources of waste, fraud, or abuse and prohibit any such future agreements;

(d) Coordinate with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to ensure that no funding for agreements described in subsection (c) of this section is included in any appropriations request for the Department of Justice or the Department of Homeland Security; and

(e) Initiate clawback or recoupment procedures, if appropriate, for any agreements described in subsection (c) of this section.

Sec. 20. Denial of Public Benefits to Illegal Aliens. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall take all appropriate action to ensure that all agencies identify and stop the provision of any public benefits to any illegal alien not authorized to receive them under the provisions of the INA or other relevant statutory provisions.

Sec. 21. Hiring More Agents and Officers. Subject to available appropriations, the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, shall take all appropriate action to significantly increase the number of agents and officers available to perform the duties of immigration officers.

Sec. 22. Severability. It is the policy of the United States to enforce this order to the maximum extent possible to advance the interests of the United States. Accordingly:

(a) If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its other provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby; and

(b) If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid because of the failure to follow certain procedures, the relevant executive branch officials shall implement those procedural requirements to conform with existing law and with any applicable court orders.

Sec. 23. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[genderoutlaws]

didnt expect to be talking abt starbucks so much after i quit but it just keeps getting worse

8 human trafficking survivors are suing Starbucks, exposing years of forced labor and child labor. the article starts with the story of a man who was enslaved at age 16 and was just rescued last year. if nothing else has convinced you to boycott, please let this sway you...

it also says the NGO CoffeeWatch is filing a complaint with US Customs and Border Protection attempting to block these corporations from importing coffees produced wholly or in part by slave labor in Brazil.

but this isn't unique to Starbucks, this is the unspoken truth of many of our goods in the west, relying on the exploitation of people in the global south. i pray all the survivors secure a massive payout, but still.. i cant imagine anything would ever make up for this kind of treatment.

[xtruss]

US Entry Becomes A Travel Minefield As Canada, Ireland, Denmark, And Germany Report Cases Of Tourist Detained Despite Valid Visas: New Report You Need to Know

— Tuesday, April 8, 2025 | USA Today

US Travel Becomes Riskier For Visa and Green Card Holders as Canada, Ireland, Denmark, and Germany Issue Warnings Amid Rising Border Scrutiny.

In recent months, many green card holders, visa applicants, and international travelers have found that entering or returning to the United States has become significantly more complex and uncertain. Tougher border inspections and increased enforcement at airports and land entry points are contributing to rising anxiety—part of broader immigration enforcement trends that began under the Trump administration and appear to be continuing.

As the spring and summer travel seasons near, travelers are growing wary. Stories of lawful permanent residents and foreign nationals being questioned, delayed, or even detained have raised red flags for those hoping to vacation, study, or reunite with family in the US. Universities such as Brown have proactively advised international students and staff to avoid unnecessary travel, citing a need for “Caution in the Current Climate.”

Adding to concerns, governments including those of Canada, Ireland, Denmark, and Germany have issued updated advisories, warning their citizens to be meticulous about US entry requirements to avoid complications or detention.

Legal Experts Warn Travelers to Know Their Rights

Immigration lawyers across the country are now urging foreign nationals to understand their legal standing before flying into the US. Stephanie Gee, a Senior Immigration Law Expert at the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP), explains that three primary groups arrive at US ports of entry: American citizens, green card holders (permanent residents), and visa holders.

US Citizens, By Law, Cannot Be Denied Entry. Green card holders have more protections than visa holders but are still vulnerable to increased scrutiny, especially if there are any red flags in their record. Importantly, both US citizens and green card holders may legally decline to answer questions from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents or hand over digital devices for inspection—though doing so can result in delays.

Understanding Your Risk Based on Immigration Status

The level of scrutiny travelers face varies based on numerous factors, including nationality, visa type, and prior criminal or immigration history. According to a recent report, immigration attorney Stephen Yale-Loehr pointed to a draft list of 43 nations whose citizens might soon face travel restrictions. While the list hasn’t been publicly finalized, it reportedly includes countries such as Iran, Libya, Afghanistan, Venezuela, and Cuba.

Travelers from countries potentially facing future travel bans are being strongly advised to reassess their plans—even if they possess valid documents. Visa holders from these regions are particularly at risk of being denied entry or placed in secondary inspection, which can sometimes lead to hours or even days of detainment.

There have been increasing reports of visa holders being forced to return on the next outbound flight, while others have faced prolonged questioning or temporary detention. Green card holders are also not exempt. Extended trips abroad, especially when paired with any prior criminal convictions, can result in difficult re-entry experiences. One such case involved Fabian Schmidt, a German National with a US Green Card, who was detained at Boston Logan International Airport over a years-old minor drug offense.

Electronic Devices May Be Searched

Another challenge many travelers now face is the possibility of being asked to unlock smartphones, laptops, or cameras during inspection. While US citizens and permanent residents are not legally obligated to provide passwords, visa holders who refuse may be denied entry. Even for those not required to comply, refusing access to electronics can lead to extended delays or further questioning.

CBP agents may review devices for material that they believe indicates criminal or security concerns, including past legal troubles, affiliations with extremist groups, or evidence of visa fraud.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) recommends travelers take proactive steps: request the names and badge numbers of CBP agents if asked to unlock devices, and always get a receipt if any items are confiscated. These steps help ensure accountability in cases of wrongful searches or seizures.

Steps to Take If Entry Is Denied or Delayed

Though not common, detainments and extended questioning do occur. If you or someone you know is subject to secondary screening or held for any reason, immigration attorneys stress the importance of staying calm and being prepared. Having contact information for a trusted friend or an immigration lawyer can make a critical difference.

Travelers who are not fluent in English have the right to request an interpreter. Stephanie Gee emphasizes that this request should be documented formally to ensure it’s honored and to protect the traveler’s rights in case of future legal issues.

Prepare Before You Travel

As summer approaches and more people plan trips, green card holders and visa holders should carefully consider the potential risks of traveling internationally. While US Citizens are Guaranteed Re-entry, permanent residents and Visa-Holding Visitors Face a Different Reality—especially those with legal issues or originating from countries flagged by US authorities.

Before booking a ticket, it’s advisable to consult an Immigration Professional who can assess your personal circumstances. Knowing your rights and preparing for the worst-case scenario may help avoid unnecessary stress or even denial of entry.

In this new era of heightened scrutiny, staying informed and vigilant can make all the difference.

[youthchronical]

Deported Professor Rasha Alawieh Attended Hezbollah Leader’s Funeral, D.H.S. Says

The Department of Homeland Security said on Monday that it had deported a Brown University professor and doctor with a valid visa because they said she attended a Hezbollah leader’s funeral in February during a trip to Lebanon. When questioned by Customs and Border Protection officers upon her return to the United States, Dr. Rasha Alawieh, who is Lebanese, “openly admitted” her support for the…

[alyfoxxxen]

CBP: Tariffs have generated $500 million since April 5