#automatic labeling
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text


every time i forget to don my hazmat suit before tag-spelunking i regret it
#community label was automatically added as i uploaded this#their AI is getting false positives from their own underwater filter
100 notes
·
View notes
Text
Trans men who call themselves sapphic or lesbians aren't invalidating or misgendering or transphobic towards themselves, btw... no trans man is forcing lesbians to be with them. Literally no lesbian has to date a trans man if they don't want too plus vice versa... idk what's so hard to understand here 😭
#.⎯♗·】#yeah a trans man can be a lesbian or sapphic if they call themselves that#doesnt automatically mean every trans man wants to be seen as a lesbian or sapphic...#weird generalization stuff there LOL#mogai#qai#liom#pro lesboy#lesboy#trans man lesbian#lesboys ily all#pro good faith identity#pro good faith#good faith labels#good faith#good faith identity
127 notes
·
View notes
Text
read a really good nsr fanfic the other day and ive sort of been thinking bout aunty ever since


#no straight roads#nsr#nsr mayday#nsr zuke#my art#nsr fanart#nsr aunty#art#dude rhe first time i posted this tumblr automatically labeled it as mature and i DONT KNOW WHYYY#anyways the fanfiction was Ghost Notes by hyenasaurus on ao3#hasn't been updated in 3-4 years......ended on a cliffhanger..... SIGHS....
207 notes
·
View notes
Text
The biphobia towards Billie is insane. Never did she say she was a lesbian. She said she was queer. Bi people never get treated seriously in lesbian/ gay spaces and I’m sick of it. Leave her alone. Leave bi people alone.
Leave biphobia in the past.
And yes bi and queer aren’t interchangeable but the reaction to Billie is biphobia.
#billie eilish#bisexual#bisexuality#bi#lgbt#why I label myself queer not bi but even if you label queer people automatically think that means gay
37 notes
·
View notes
Text
Ramblings on Fandom: Peggy Carter, Steve Rogers, Delusional Shippers, and Alleged Misogyny
So with the release of Season 2 of What If…? emotions are once again running high, the outrage is outraging, and people are up in arms about the whole Captain Carter situation. While I do think that some reactions are a little overblown, even needlessly aggressive in tone to the unfortunate detriment of their otherwise convincing arguments, I share the confusion and frustration about the sudden centering of a long-dead & never excessively popular character, the sidelining of the Steve-Bucky friendship, and the as-inexplicable-as-it-is-total exclusion of Sam Wilson as Captain America. However, I’m not here to talk about the show because (1) I haven’t watched this season and have no plans to (why waste time torturing myself with something I know I’ll hate?) and (2) other people have already written dozens of metas about it, so what could I possibly add at this point.
What I do want need to talk about (lest I explode) is something that has irritated me for a long time and that is now happening again: Every time someone even mildly criticizes Peggy Carter, expresses doubts about her suitability as a heroine, or even just questions her disproportionate importance to the franchise post-EG, inevitably a certain section of fans will come out of the woodwork to immediately throw around accusations of misogyny and yell about how we’re all just a bunch of delusional Stuckies who are mad that she got "in the way" of our ship. Sigh.
This is gonna be a long one, so I’ll put it under a cut. Rant incoming. You've been warned. If you don't want to read, simply keep scrolling.
First of all, let me state very clearly that I’m not debating the existence of misogyny and sexism in fandom spaces—or in the media from which these fandoms originate. At all. It exists, it’s a thing, I’m not denying that. Which is exactly why it frustrates me endlessly to see these accusations thrown around as a gotcha! argument to shut down any and all critical debate around a female character. All it does in the end is escalate rhetoric and radicalize attitudes.
In the case of Peggy Carter, specifically her treatment by Stucky shippers, I’ve always found 'misogyny as a motive' to be a largely unsubstantiated accusation.¹ Now, I neither presume nor do I want to speak for the entirety of Stuckynation, so I will not claim that there aren't corners of the fandom where people discuss her in ways that I find off-putting and deeply unserious, but I will say this: If you genuinely believe that disliking one (1) fictional female character equals “hating all women” and wanting to suppress and marginalize their presence in fiction and real life alike—then I think we need to take that word away from you until you’ve learned its true meaning.
You might also want to ask yourself how exactly reducing a female character to a mute trophy wife or a heroine who has to act out her love interest’s recycled storylines helps your feminist fight.
As for the “getting in the way of your ship” part of the argument. Very simply put: No character can get in the way of something if there never ever was “a way” to that something to begin with. “Being mad” implies that there was a reasonable expectation that wasn’t met, a substantive hope that was crushed. Now, I’ve said this before and I’ll gladly say it again a million more times: No Stucky shipper in their right mind ever truly thought that there was even the slightest chance that Marvel Studios owned by the Walt Disney Company would allow Steve “Captain America” Rogers and Bucky “Winter Soldier” Barnes to be canonized as an explicitly romantic pairing in their billion dollar franchise. Be serious. That was never in the cards. I wish we all lived in a world where it was, but we don’t, and it wasn’t. The best we could ever hope for was for Steve and Bucky to get a good, satisfying, in-character ending. And if, in Steve’s case, that would’ve included hints (or more) about a possible rekindling of his, uh, aborted romance with Sharon—then so be it. But we never got any of that. The characters never got any of that. Instead they sent Steve into 1950s suburban hell, literally trapped him behind a white picket fence, and condemned him to a life of passivity and lies, all so he could be married to a woman he barely knew a long time ago in a completely different world; who built and ran a top-to-bottom Hydra-infested organization, but apparently never noticed that there was anything wrong with her life's work. For decades. Great. As for Bucky—well, we’ve all seen the devastatingly grim-faced, utterly lonely, and deeply sad version of him that was presented to us in TFATWS. Happy endings all around, I guess.
So. Am I mad that Steve didn’t get to ride into the rainbow-colored sunset with Bucky at the end of EG? No. Because that was never going to happen anyway. Would I have been mad had he ended up with Sharon or another female character in the 21st century? Also no. Granted, I wouldn’t have been ecstatic about it, but mad? No. But am I mad that Steve ended up with this specific female character under these specific circumstances as presented in canon? Fuck yeah, I am.
The thing is: I personally believe Steve and Peggy to be fundamentally incompatible when it comes to the way they view the world and their respective places in it; their morals and values; their capacity for compassion and empathy; their ability and willingness to compartmentalize, compromise, and collaborate with people and institutions whose ethics and/or politics do not align with their own. I have a real hard time believing that a relationship between these two (or worse, a hasty marriage) could be either happy or long-lasting.
I don’t believe Peggy to be inherently evil, I don’t hate her, I simply think she operates within a different moral framework than Steve (and even genuinely believes it to be a righteous one).² Your mileage may vary, but I personally happen to find that framework reprehensible, even indecent, and ultimately dangerous. After all, over the course of the 20th century, we have seen exactly where that kind of “the ends justify the means” brand of pragmatism leads—over and over again. Not to mention that the people who use this line of argument to defend characters like Peggy (or real-life politicians for that matter) never seem to want to look too closely at who gets to define what "the ends" are in the first place and who decides when they've finally been met.
(Never. The answer is never.)
And to be clear, there is absolutely nothing wrong with depicting, and even centering a narrative around a morally (dark)gray character—oftentimes it’s actually the more interesting option—but you cannot at the same time claim that they are purely good and should be only admired as such when their actions literally tell an entirely different story.
So, no. I will not accept Peggy Carter as the shining aspirational heroine that the MCU so badly wants to sell her to me as—while simultaneously continuing to reveal things that paint an increasingly darker picture of her character. And I will certainly not celebrate seeing one of my favorite characters of all time—whose defining trait was that he couldn't ignore "a situation pointed south"; who used to fight for the little guy and against the establishment; who once said about the very organization that Peggy Carter helped build that it was so corrupt, it all needed to go—rendered morally inert for some hollow happy ending that may as well be a conservative’s wet dream full of false nostalgia for an America that never really existed. I cannot find it in me to be anything less but mad about that.
But that does not make me a misogynist. It does not make me a delusional shipper. It makes me someone who looks at what the MCU has been telling me about Peggy Carter for years now—over and over again—and takes them at their own word.
--------
¹ If you’ve actually read a a fair number of Stucky(!) fanfics you will have noticed that the reverence afforded to and "page time" devoted to her character and her relationship with Steve is somewhat disproportionate to anything that's backed up by canon—well, up until EG, where she was suddenly reanimated as The Great Love of Steve’s Life—and in my experience, it's highly unusual for any fandom to put so much (mostly) positive attention on another character, let alone a potential love interest that is not part of the endgame ship.
² I also want to emphasize that if you love Peggy and she's your fave: good for you! I genuinely have no beef with you. People can agree to disagree. All I ask for is that we maybe stop willfully ignoring the less savory aspects of her character. You don't need to pretend she's perfect to justify your affection for her. I LOVE Steve, and yet I have no problem conceding that he is FAR from perfect.
#*drops post & runs away* i may regret this but it's my blog and i rant if i want to#i know some people will roll their eyes & i debated posting this at all but i simply had to get it off my chest once and for all.#so there. now i can be free. or something.#also i have no idea what to tag this & i personally find 'anti' tags silly bc why is critical discussion automatically labeled as 'anti'?#but whatever i'll play nice. so i guess:#anti peggy carter#anti steggy#anti endgame#hope that covers it#wading into the dIsCoUrsE
225 notes
·
View notes
Text
Undertale: 17 (Unreasonable version)
The Abandoned Quiche (QuicheGuilt) was going to use the unused Global.Flag 17
Gaster's theme is 17 seconds long
The intervals in Gaster's theme is 1 7 -7 -1 (From this video skip to 7 minutes)
Not using unreasonable math this round, it's only numbers.
Quicheguilt using global flag 17, Junk food that was previously thrown away heals 17, this is light justification for guessing that 17 = Abandoned/left behind/discarded
Q is the 17th letter of the Alphabet
When you QUIT the game, you're leaving your progress behind, you're leaving their world.
The one that left all of monsterkind behind was the QUEEN.
When you beat the game, there's no music in Papyrus's room, it's QUIET. (This one's a stretch for my obligatory Papyrus mention, also pretending everything else is not a stretch)
#undertale theory#suspicious numbers#can you tell I like numbers#Anyway other than automatically named items with 17#these are all the purposely named 17#hey max why do you assume that quicheguilt was purposely labeled with flag 17#Well that's because (runs away)
27 notes
·
View notes
Text
genuinely squinting in suspicion at the PRECIPITOUS increase in automatic mature content label false positives in the past week
#Suddenly a third of my dash is being incorrectly automatically labeled as mature content#I assume this has to do with the android store related updates
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
This is what pisses me off, but everyone wants to blame bakudeku and togachako shippers for being 'toxic'.
#as a bakudeku shipper i love the idea of izuocha it's genuinely beey adorable and understandable<33#but don't be toxic and disrespectful because people have different opinions#if you make one opinion that has absolutely ANYTHING to do with Izuku#bakugo#toga#or uraraka#you automatically get labeled as a toxic gay shipper which is so annoying#i thank god that i have always been apart of the non-toxic side of the mha fandom forever because i don't think I could have ever survived#on the other side#bnha#mha#my hero academia#izuku midoriya#bakudeku#boku no hero academia#mha epilogue#mha spoilers
38 notes
·
View notes
Text
the mature content label thing is to the point where i've seen wrestling guys in long tights where the only skin showing is a chest getting mature labels. we aren't saying or implying deathmatch content shouldn't get mature labels. we're saying there's no fucking reason for a picture of a guy in pants in non sexual situations, not even actively wrestling situations, to get a mature label from tumblr! there's no reason for it!
#not even just wrestling#i've seen what i assume are automatic mature labels on fully clothed oasis photos#fully clothed. not even where things seem slightly 'mature'. not loch lomond. not those photos of noel and clint#not the rope photoshoot or god forbid photos of them drinking#just normal photos#YES nudity but also that shirtless liam from a photobook?#insane for that to get a label#idk#i might be saying nothing
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
i conjured the word gynophagia as a potential alternative word for pussy-eating and upon searching, learned a number of things in rapid succession
gynophagia is a fetish involving cooking and eating women
there is a decently sized community for it
androphagia exists as well, for eating men
gynophagia people are fixated on cooked breasts and pussies, while androphagia people seem to have a pronounced focus on cooked feet
ai art has really helped these communities flourish
there is a decently sized subreddit for cannibalism art
unsurprisingly, some of these are fairly racist in their depictions. surprisingly, they are outnumbered by people who like to post women with apples in their mouths or poorly photoshopped to be standing in abattoirs and industrial kitchens
also people photoshopped to have grill marks
do you think theres any overlap with the "cannibalism as a metaphor for love" community or is this a whole separate sphere
#i did not put the mature label on this it was placed automatically it seems#but like. it is mature so ill leave it
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
i am very sure no one here will understand but i have to get it out of my system one way or another
it’s funny because nath n cas are more nicomaki than cas n armin so armin’s gotta deal with them except he’s having the time of his life
“this is so kismesis!!!” shut up armin
he is in fact not helping and that’s okay (is it really though?)
do you think nathaniel could rock the leather bodysuit
meanwhile the other three are like having a garden tea party or something and it’s actually really nice and they get along well
they’d feed each other sweets and then get mistaken for a polycule maybe i dunno
they could also have baking sessions oh my god that’d be so cute
printemps isn’t shown here but if they were here uh
kentin could be hanayo but i’m blanking on the other two
#my candy love#amour sucre#corazon de melon#amor doce#mcl nathaniel#mcl castiel#mcl armin#mcl lysander#mcl kentin#mcl alexy#for some reason this got automatically labelled as mature content#is it the poly word#did that cause the content detector to do this
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
stede doing android ed the very intimate courtesy of gently cleaning some of the more fiddly bits of his guts by squirting puffs of air over his hardware to displace the dust. and then turning up the pressure on the nozzle to really get into the crevices while holding ed down (per request) to keep him from squirming (it tickles(?)) and all ed wants is for stede to put down the pump and do that thing he did one time before where he licked the supple pad of his human finger and stuck it in there and scrubbed
#i dont even have a robot kink whatevers going on with me here is far weirder#i just think ed should get to have his bf stick his hands into ed’s body and fiddle around in there is that too much to ask#EDIT. HEY OUT OF ALL THE DRAFTS TO COME BACK AND FIND A MATURE LABEL HAS BEEN AUTOMATICALLY ADDED WHY THIS ONE.#90% sure this is a post with an audience of 1.) me and 2.) jay adamarks#as for the rest of you well i hope im awakening something in somebody.
40 notes
·
View notes
Text
Okay, Tumblr question: do blogs that have been flagged as potentially nsfw automatically get "Potentially mature" slapped on their posts or something? Because just this week I've seen it applied to
A gifset of food (just tag it)
Something about architecture for. (???)
A gifset of Penelope Featherington in Bridgerton that has nothing even vaguely sexual in it (unless it's there bc she's fat in which case OH BOY)
Like what the fuck IS happening here???
ETA: my mistake, the Penelope gifset has a gif where she's hiding her naked boobs with her hands, and you see her bare shoulders
Like yeah you can tell she's naked but it's nothing more than you'd see in a shower scene
#Tumblr#community#label#if it's not automatic then some people are NOT using community labels the way they should be used
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
ok no, i try not to get annoyed by what others say but there is a difference between people bending reality to delule themselves into making a straight woman queer just because they can't deal with liking a straight artist versus pointing out a man who has always presented himself as queer
#like i get so fucking angry when people say pete was faking being gay just to gain an audience like what????#also just because he never put a label on himself that doesn't automatically exclude him from being queer/nonstraight#like as a guy who also doesn't label themselves i find it so fucking annoying#I hate gen z need for one to microlabel themselves at the first chance unless you get defaulted as cishet#like seriously fuck off#no one owes you a label and it's weird to demand others to label themselves
31 notes
·
View notes
Text
I am fucking begging y'all to let aromantic allosexuals have ONE FUCKING THING
Leave our terms ALONE.
Fucking christ alive.... you people are insufferable
#mewo rambles :3#not directed#not vagueposting#This post is about being aromantic and allosexual DO NOT TAG THIS AS ACE/ASEXUAL I WILL KILL YOU WITH MY LAZER EYES#Before y'all get pissy at me: no I do not care if sum1 uses contradictory labels but also being aro but not ace has#Consistently been ignored in our OWN COMMUNITY as a thing ylu can even be#And aromantic experiences ALWAYYSS have to include ace experiences too as if they automatically go together WHEN THEY DON'T#We are our SEPERATE LABEL quit treating us as automatically ace too.
15 notes
·
View notes
Note
is hishakaku divorced?
hishakaku claims to be aro/ace on account of his violent allergy to intimacy. but that doesn't explain whatever's going on between him and Jerry in 8888.
#to be clear I do not think being aro/ace automatically means repulsion to intimacy#I'm mainly trying to express that hishakaku has used the label to write off a part of his identity he is not interested in investigating#Because hishakaku is a fundamentally incurious douchebag who does not care for other people and does not want to acknowledge his incelness
13 notes
·
View notes