#best encryption software

[atozofsoftwareengineering]

17 Essential Steps to Fortify Your AI Application

Master AI security with these 17 essential steps! #AISecurity #DataProtection #CyberSecurity

In today’s digital landscape, securing AI applications is crucial for maintaining trust and ensuring data integrity. Here’s a comprehensive guide to the 17 essential steps for fortifying your AI application. 1. Encrypt Data Ensure that all data, both in transit and at rest, is encrypted. Use industry-standard encryption protocols like AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) for data at rest and TLS…

[some-programming-pearls]

How should we handle microservice data privacy compliance

Microservices handling sensitive user data are not compliant with data privacy regulations, risking legal consequences. Solution: Implement data anonymization and encryption techniques for sensitive information. Conduct regular compliance checks and audits to ensure adherence to privacy regulations. Terminology: Data Anonymization protects privacy by altering or removing personally…

[zapperrr]

Securing Your Website: Best Practices for Web Developers

As the digital landscape continues to evolve, website security has become a paramount concern for businesses and individuals alike. With cyber threats becoming increasingly sophisticated, it is crucial for web developers to adopt robust security measures to safeguard their websites and the sensitive data they handle. In this article, we'll delve into the best practices that web developers can implement to enhance the security of their websites and protect against potential threats.

Introduction

In today's interconnected world, websites serve as the digital storefront for businesses, making them vulnerable targets for cyber attacks. From data breaches to malware infections, the consequences of a security breach can be severe, ranging from financial loss to damage to reputation. Therefore, prioritizing website security is essential for maintaining the trust and confidence of users.

Understanding Website Security

Before diving into best practices, it's crucial to understand the importance of website security and the common threats faced by websites. Website security encompasses measures taken to protect websites from cyber threats and unauthorized access. Common threats include malware infections, phishing attacks, SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and brute force attacks.

Best Practices for Web Developers

Keeping Software Updated

One of the most fundamental steps in website security is keeping all software, including the content management system (CMS), plugins, and server software, updated with the latest security patches and fixes. Outdated software is often targeted by attackers due to known vulnerabilities that can be exploited.

Implementing HTTPS

Implementing HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure) encrypts the data transmitted between the website and its users, ensuring confidentiality and integrity. HTTPS not only protects sensitive information but also boosts trust among visitors, as indicated by the padlock icon in the browser's address bar.

Using Strong Authentication Methods

Implementing strong authentication methods, such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) and CAPTCHA, adds an extra layer of security to user accounts. MFA requires users to provide multiple forms of verification, such as a password and a one-time code sent to their mobile device, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

Securing Against SQL Injection Attacks

SQL injection attacks occur when malicious actors exploit vulnerabilities in web applications to execute arbitrary SQL commands. Web developers can prevent SQL injection attacks by using parameterized queries and input validation to sanitize user inputs effectively.

Protecting Sensitive Data

It's essential to employ encryption techniques to protect sensitive data, such as passwords, credit card information, and personal details, stored on the website's servers. Encrypting data at rest and in transit mitigates the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access.

Regular Security Audits

Conducting regular security audits helps identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the website's infrastructure and codebase. Penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, and code reviews enable web developers to proactively address security issues before they are exploited by attackers.

Choosing a Secure Hosting Provider

Selecting a reputable and secure hosting provider is critical for ensuring the overall security of your website. When evaluating hosting providers, consider factors such as security features, reliability, scalability, and customer support.

Evaluating Security Features

Choose a hosting provider that offers robust security features, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems (IDS), malware scanning, and DDoS protection. These features help protect your website from various cyber threats and ensure continuous uptime.

Ensuring Regular Backups

Regularly backing up your website's data is essential for mitigating the impact of security incidents, such as data breaches or website compromises. Choose a hosting provider that offers automated backup solutions and store backups securely offsite.

Customer Support and Response to Security Incidents

Opt for a hosting provider that provides responsive customer support and has established protocols for handling security incidents. In the event of a security breach or downtime, prompt assistance from the hosting provider can minimize the impact on your website and business operations.

Implementing Firewall Protection

Firewalls act as a barrier between your website and external threats, filtering incoming and outgoing network traffic based on predefined security rules. There are several types of firewalls, including network firewalls, web application firewalls (WAF), and host-based firewalls.

Configuring and Maintaining Firewalls

Properly configuring and maintaining firewalls is crucial for effective security. Define firewall rules based on the principle of least privilege, regularly update firewall configurations to reflect changes in the website's infrastructure, and monitor firewall logs for suspicious activity.

Educating Users about Security

In addition to implementing technical measures, educating users about security best practices is essential for enhancing overall website security. Provide users with resources, such as security guidelines, tips for creating strong passwords, and information about common phishing scams.

Importance of User Awareness

Users play a significant role in maintaining website security, as they are often the targets of social engineering attacks. By raising awareness about potential threats and providing guidance on how to recognize and respond to them, web developers can empower users to stay vigilant online.

Providing Training and Resources

Offer training sessions and educational materials to help users understand the importance of security and how to protect themselves while using the website. Regularly communicate updates and reminders about security practices to reinforce good habits.

Monitoring and Responding to Security Incidents

Despite taking preventive measures, security incidents may still occur. Establishing robust monitoring systems and incident response protocols enables web developers to detect and respond to security threats in a timely manner.

Setting Up Monitoring Tools

Utilize monitoring tools, such as intrusion detection systems (IDS), security information and event management (SIEM) systems, and website monitoring services, to detect abnormal behavior and potential security breaches. Configure alerts to notify you of suspicious activity promptly.

Establishing Incident Response Protocols

Develop comprehensive incident response plans that outline roles, responsibilities, and procedures for responding to security incidents. Establish clear communication channels and escalation paths to coordinate responses effectively and minimize the impact of security breaches.

Securing your website requires a proactive approach that involves implementing a combination of technical measures, choosing a secure hosting provider, educating users about security best practices, and establishing robust monitoring and incident response protocols. By following these best practices, web developers can mitigate the risk of security breaches and safeguard their websites and the sensitive data they handle.

[bananatampa]

Best encryption software pc

#Best encryption software pc mac os x#

#Best encryption software pc movie#

#Best encryption software pc mp4#

The Limitations of the Free DVD Ripping Software Only support Windows OS but it available on 62 languages.The file size of about 100MB is quite big.More customizations options available like adjust video bitrates, size, add watermark & subtitle before starting the DVD ripping process.Regular updates and improving make it a better application.Can backup DVD and blu-ray discs but it doesn’t rip encrypted disc.A tool with intuitive interface and support many popular video formats.You can use the program to convert PDF, video & audio, rip DVD and Blu ray, screen recorder as well as video downloader. This software is a free, multifunctional media processing tool. Blu-ray ripping is free for MakeMKV beta but most free tools cannot rip the blu-ray discs.

#Best encryption software pc mac os x#

Available for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux.Can preserve all of the source disc’s info like menus, HD audio, tracks, chapters, etc.Unlike other free tools, this software can rip copy-protected discs.Ability to rip both DVD and blu-ray discs (30-day full-features free trial).To use the shareware feature after 30-days free trial, you need to purchase the registration key. However, if you want to rip blu-ray discs, it’s shareware functionality.

#Best encryption software pc mp4#

So, if you want to have like MP4 format, you need another program and convert the file one more time to your intended file format. One of the major drawbacks of this software is that it only can convert the file to the MKV format.

#Best encryption software pc movie#

This tool can instantly decrypted your movie on DVD discs and plays on your favorite devices like computer or DVD player. The free version of MakeMKV Beta is a simple one-click converter to transform your file to MKV format. Read the full review of WinX dvd ripper software here. There are two versions available the free trial and platinum to cater different user needs. Great support team and user guide are available waiting for you in case you encounter any problem! This is important. This quality DVD program also very fast in the ripping process and it can make 1:1 clone the full DVD disc to ISO image and DVD folder. free with corresponding profile settings respectively. The WinX Platinum Ripper is also great for transferring DVD movies to your smartphone or tablet, i.e., iPhone, iPod, Apple TV, Android phone, PSP, etc. It supports both homemade DVDs and commercial DVDs, and able to remove copy-protected restrictions (DRM removal) like CSS encryption, region code, Sony ARccOS, UOPs, RCE, etc. More than 320 output formats including MP4, WMV, MPEG, MOV, FLV, H.264, etc. Many reviews voted WinX dvd ripper software as their best dvd ripper as it’s easy to use, and it can help you copy the DVD for backup, rip DVDs (including the commercial and latest DVD), and edit DVD.

[lasclchain]

Best encryption software for usb memory stick

Best encryption software for usb memory stick how to#

Best encryption software for usb memory stick portable#

Best encryption software for usb memory stick software#

Best encryption software for usb memory stick how to#

In this segment I’ll show you step-by-step how to encrypt your external drive. With it, you won’t have to bother about viruses and worms that can.

Best encryption software for usb memory stick software#

But not everyone is able to understand how to use this technology properly. Ways to Encrypt Your External Hard Drive or USB. This is one of the best USB security software on the internet. Open Source means the availability of complicated technology to everyone.

Best encryption software for usb memory stick portable#

Well, SecurStick is a portable encryption utility, so it doesn’t require an administrator to run the app on your workstation. Unfortunatelly, the availability of some good open-source products gave birth to 50-100 of clones. It is another best software that provides 256-bit AES encryption to protect the data stored on the USB drive or another removable device. Avoid clones of popular on-the-fly encryption open-source encryption products. Many-many bits in the encryption algorithm does not mean the superiour security of this algorithm.įor example: Diamond2-2048 bit is not secure than AES-128 bit. Examples of good encryption algorithms: AES (Rijndael), Blowfish, Serpent and etc. Why? Because old encryption algorithms were examined by thousands of cryptographists and even by whole specialized institutions for many years. Avoid encryption software advertising own super-puper-strong encryption algorithm.Īctually, only old known encryption algorithms are really secure. Only real encryption can guarantee the real security. Actually, your confidential information is absolutely insecure! And believe us - it is very easy to recover all your "encrypted" & hidden files for real curious person. Such kind of software just hides files from the underlying file system. The speed of read/write operations on USB flash drives does not allow to encrypt several GBs of data in 2-3 seconds. Gigabytes of data in several seconds on usual usb memory stick? Khm. Your confidential financial documents are absolutely secure. Just because you have antivirus software installed on your PC doesnt mean a zero-day Trojan cant steal your personal data. Some companies producing encryption software write something like: "Our product has many patent-pending security layers and can encrypt several gigabytes of data on USB Flash Drive in 3-5 seconds. We have been developing security products for last 12 years and we would like to give you a few advices how to choose best encryption software. In nowdays the market of security products is overloaded by more than 80 different desktop applications for Windows (r) platform and it is very complex task for average user to choose a really good security product. Category: Encryption Tools Developer: USB Security - Download - Buy: 30. Best Encryption Software Best Encryption Software - How to choose? password protect external hard drive software lock private documents on usb stick encryption security area - idoo usb encryption software, creat password protect external hard drive.

[bangkokmmorg]

Best encryption software free mac

#BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE FREE MAC SOFTWARE#

#BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE FREE MAC TRIAL#

#BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE FREE MAC PASSWORD#

#BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE FREE MAC MAC#

#BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE FREE MAC PASSWORD#

Alternatively, you can just stick with a master password if required.

#BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE FREE MAC SOFTWARE#

Renee File Protector is another piece of file encryption software for Windows, but this one allows you to have different passwords for different files or folders, effectively creating multiple security levels. You can also choose your preferred encryption strength as 128 or 256-bit. Rather than encrypt all files on your harddrive, instead it provides an encrypted area for you to drag files into - which means you need to ensure you delete the original copy so as to avoid having both encrypted and non-encrypted versions on your harddrive.

#BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE FREE MAC MAC#

It runs on all versions of Windows (32-bit as well as 64-bit).Ī master password is required to access any files, which can be a little limiting if you'd prefer to have different passwords for different files, not least if you're looking to share some of them with family and/or friends.Ĭoncealer is a file encryption program specifically for Apple Mac computers. Secure IT 2000 offers file and folder encryption, compression and file shredding all in one with command line processing and secure emails. This means that it may take a little longer than some other programs, but it does mean your files are potentially more manageable after. Secure IT 2000 from Cypherix is a file encryption program that also compresses your files.

#BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE FREE MAC TRIAL#

There is a free version but it's very limited and perhaps best thought of as a way to trial the software and help become used to the interface and basic functions. As well as this, there’s passport management, and you can access your encrypted files through a smartphone app. There are also cloud storage capabilities thrown into the mix – the software will automatically protect files saved on services such as Google Drive and Dropbox.ĪxCrypt is fully multilingual, and it can work with languages such as Dutch, French, German, Italian, Korean, Spanish, Swedish, Russian and Portuguese – with more support planned for the future. It provides strong security, with files protected by either 128-bit or 256-bit AES encryption, which should thwart any intruders. The software has been designed specifically for individuals and small teams within businesses. While free software can be convenient for some, it’s not always as powerful as premium offerings, and AxCrypt is a good bet if you want something reliable. This is great because OneDrive works really well as a small business and personal cloud storage solution, so the ability to encrypt files is a great bonus.Īdditionally, OneDrive is an excellent choice for anyone who is committed to using Microsoft's services, as it offers neat integration with, the company's popular email platform, for instance. OneDrive also ties in nicely with Windows and there is a selection of reasonable mobile apps to facilitate access on the move. However, while the default is for only you to be able to access them, there is the option to share specific files and folders with other users. You can choose which files and folders to include, and these will become locked and encrypted. You just have to sit back, read the pros and cons of those tools and choose which ones suit you.Microsoft OneDrive may not be the first option that comes to people's minds when they think of encryption software, but what a lot of people don't realize is that it comes with its own secure and encrypted file storage area in the form of the Personal Vault. In this article, we’ve mentioned 4 encryption tools, which are our favorite in a way or the other. These encryption tools keep them locked and only can be opened on your command.īut the question arises that in between hundreds of tools, which one should we pick to keep our data safe.īelow is the answer to this question. Whether they’re your personal selfies that you click in… well, let’s say “ free time” or the notes in which you’ve written all your feelings. You must keep the sensitive stuff in your devices under control, and for that, many Encryption tools maintain the data safe from unwelcome guests. We have so many data saved on our devices, and we’re completely unaware of who wants to fetch for the same. This is the modern time in which we can’t trust anybody. If you are as cynical as me, then I’m sure you also tend to protect every single thing of your phone or computer by putting a lot of strong passwords. Encrypting your files is of utmost importance in today’s life.

[mombanana]

Best encryption software for onedrive with web browser

#Best encryption software for onedrive with web browser update#

#Best encryption software for onedrive with web browser windows 10#

#Best encryption software for onedrive with web browser software#

#Best encryption software for onedrive with web browser free#

A $9.99-per-month Home subscription includes 6TB (1TB each for six users). Office 365 users get an extra terabyte with their $6.99-per-month Personal subscription, along with more features like expiring and password-protected share links and ransomware protection, not to mention downloadable Office programs.

#Best encryption software for onedrive with web browser free#

Other smaller players like Mega and pCloud also offer more free space but fewer features. This compares with 1GB free for iCloud (unless you bought an Apple device, which gets you 5GB), 2GB for Dropbox, and 15GB for Google Drive. Free users get 5GB free storage space, and some smartphones and PCs add free OneDrive storage. Your OneDrive AccountĪnyone with a Microsoft account already has a OneDrive account that includes everyone who's ever signed up for a Hotmail, Live, Office 365, or account, but you can also sign up with any other email provider. Let's take a look at the service from these various angles. The clients include computer, mobile, and web, and the functions are things like syncing, viewing, playing, and simple storage. The data types include documents, photos, video, music, or settings. It also syncs Office documents and enables coauthoring.īecause of this diversity of functions, there are a few different cross-sections from which you can view the service-by type of data, client, or function.

#Best encryption software for onedrive with web browser windows 10#

For Windows 10 users, it backs up device settings, including things like lock-screen and desktop-background images and browser favorites. If you want the same set of files replicated on multiple PCs, it provides folder syncing. If you just want access to documents or media files, it offers simple online storage accessible from the web. Like iCloud and Google Drive, OneDrive serves a lot of functions.

#Best encryption software for onedrive with web browser update#

The latest update also adds the ability to cast photos to a TV via Chromecast, to organize photos by date or source, and to filter by folder. The newest feature for OneDrive is online photo editing more on this below in the section on photos. Apple's competing iCloud is only available for Apple devices, and its website lacks basic functions like search. OneDrive integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Office (both the installed and online versions) and includes rich photo-management features. Of course, everything is also available in any web browser you log in to. Microsoft's online backup and syncing service offers apps not only for PCs, but also for Macs, Androids, iOS, and Xbox. The service's deep integration with Windows 10 and Office 365 (now called Microsoft 365) and its completeness, maturity, and polish earn it not only an Editors' Choice award, but also a rare 5-star rating. OneDrive has attractive and capable web and mobile interfaces, photo AI tagging, real-time collaborative editing, and powerful search. OneDrive's functionality and design have reached a point of slick usability and reliability with a rich feature set, online office apps, and wide platform support. Well, that's not entirely accurate, since OneDrive actually preceded those cloud file storage and syncing services by at least five years. OneDrive is Microsoft's answer to Apple's iCloud and Google Drive.

#Best encryption software for onedrive with web browser software#

Best Malware Removal and Protection Software.

[onionsites]

ONİONSİTES - DRAGON+ (2)

Onion sites, also known as.onion sites, are a unique type of website that can only be accessed through the Tor network. The Tor network, short for The Onion Router, provides a layer of anonymity and encryption for users accessing these sites, making them popular for those seeking privacy and security online. Unlike traditional websites that can be accessed through standard web browsers, onion sites list require special software, such as the Tor browser, to navigate. Individuals can create onion versions of regular websites or develop standalone onion sites for specific purposes. The exclusivity and privacy features of onion sites contribute to their appeal for various users, ranging from privacy advocates to individuals navigating the dark web for specific content.

There are several reasons why individuals choose to use onion sites, with privacy and anonymity being at the forefront. Onion sites offer a level of confidentiality that is not typically found on the surface web, making them attractive to individuals seeking to protect their identity and browsing habits. Moreover, best onion sites can provide access to content that may be restricted or censored in certain regions, allowing users to circumvent such limitations and access information freely. The encrypted nature of the Tor network adds an additional layer of security, reducing the risk of surveillance and tracking by third parties, including governments and internet service providers.

Common types of content found on onion sites range from forums and marketplaces to news outlets and secure communication platforms. While exploring onion sites, individuals may come across forums, chat rooms, file-sharing platforms, and other interactive spaces that facilitate communication and information exchange in a secure environment. The anonymity and encryption offered 2024 onion sites contribute to a unique online experience, enabling users to engage with content and communities that may not be easily accessible through conventional web browsers.

[prettycottonmouthlamia]

I shouldn't have to make this post but Nintendo fans are trying extremely desperately to position the company whose cock they love the taste of in a good light and are generally doing this by spreading misinformation about the legalities of emulation so let's go over a number of the fabrications shall we?

Emulation is illegal to monetize This has so far been one of the really big ones that's taken traction, usually partnered with the sister lie that yuzu was paywalling access to early access builds. These are both lies, and are untrue. yuzu is far from the only modern emulator to be monetizing itself, plenty of mobile emulators do it, but developing an emulator for money is entirely legal. We have pretty much all of our emulation precedent set thanks to a series of lawsuits in the very early 2000s thanks to Sony suing an emulator called Bleem. There's a lot to say about Bleem, but Bleem was a commercial emulator. You could buy Bleem, in stores. At no point was there ever a court decision that Bleem was wrong to do so (despite Sony's best efforts).

Emulating current generation software or hardware is illegal. This is also wrong, and kind of fundamentally misunderstands a lot when it comes to emulation. Once again, Bleem was at the time emulating current generation software. It was a generation in its twilight, but Bleem first released in March of 1999: the Playstation 2 was not out yet. The reason why current generation software does not tend to be emulated is because we do not really have the tech or processing power to do it yet. The Switch's lower specs are entirely the reason it has had an emulator developed well ahead of the PS4 or the Xbone.

Yuzu's early access build allowed people to play Tears of the Kingdom ahead of release date This one is a couple of different statements packed together, and while I'm given to believe there's a chance other games may have been playable ahead of release, this specific statement is a lie, and maybe the funniest one on the list because it's a lie that's not even backed up by the lawsuit.

The lawsuit is extremely clear in its language that it was modded instances of Yuzu that could play Tears of the Kingdom ahead of release date, not publicly accessible builds of Yuzu. Nintendo's argument here lies in Yuzu being open source: part of the lawsuit alleges that Yuzu is responsible for any and all acts of piracy done by its users, whether or not they used official or modded builds of Yuzu. This is, of course, a fundamentally fucking insane position to argue from. It is not a particularly uncharitable reading of this as an attack on open source software to begin with, as this precedent would make any developer liable for ANY illegal action taken by someone who modified their code. Supporting this, in my opinion, makes you an asshole and liable to be clocked in the fucking mouth.

4. Literally anything involving this screenshot.

I've seen this screenshot maybe three or four times with different takes on what exactly Illegal is happening here and I'm pretty content to just call it vibes at this point. Whether this is an intelligent screenshot is a different matter, but no one has been able to point to anything actually illegal being done here. There is already precedent in allowing one to make their own back-ups of software they own, even if decryption or bypassing copy protection to do so, which is a large majority of software. Switch games are not the only games that are either encrypted or have copy protection, and this is both not the earliest generation to do it AND its not the only industry that does it.

The only point of interest here is the date, which I've seen literally no one bring up, but this correlates into another point: personal piracy is still not something Yuzu is liable for. It's a dumb thing to broadcast, but it doesn't change anything material about the software.

5. Yuzu folded because Nintendo had a smoking gun

I, I just, I'm sorry this one isn't just a lie its a really naive and incompetent view of the faults of our legal system. If anything, the settlement seems to indicate the opposite. If Nintendo was sure they had Yuzu dead the rights, they wouldn't have fucking settled. Both parties need to agree to settle! Nintendo is actively interested in trying to set legal precedent that emulation is illegal, because Nintendo is great at saying obviously wrong things with a straight face.

This could be a reason, but remember, this was a civil lawsuit, not a criminal one. Civil lawsuits have a difference in how evidence is handled, and it's pretty likely that Nintendo just has more evidence than user does on account of being able to afford a larger legal team and having planned for this lawsuit in advance, regardless of how strong that evidence actually is. It's why most of the arguments in the lawsuit read kind of insane. Civil lawsuits are not handled "beyond a reasonable doubt".

There's also the fact that legal cases can be extremely expensive, even when you know you are absolutely in the fucking right. I want to link this video by James Stephanie Sterling as evidence of this. They were completely in the fucking right, and the lawsuit still took an incredible amount of time and monetary expense to argue, and that's against an opponent who you could reasonably confuse with a scarecrow. This is ultimately how Sony eventually "won" against Bleem. Bleem never lost any of its lawsuits against Sony, in fact Sony ballsed it up twice against Bleem, but Sony continued to file lawsuits against Bleem and its company over and over, until Bleem literally could not afford it and went bankrupt.

There's also the matter of precedent. If Yuzu had taken this court, and lost, it would be really bad. There's a lot in this court case that you don't want precedent leaning towards, and due to, uh, America's current political climate and judicial regime, there's a fair chance the judge would have just sided with Nintendo anyways. Settling the lawsuit, while to be entirely clear, sucks complete ass for Yuzu as they were basically eliminated, protects the sphere of emulation as a whole.

So what was the salient parts of Nintendo's case?

The parts of Nintendo's case that hold the most weight have to do specifically with the encryption keys used to de-encrypt Switch games, and how those keys interact with the DMCA. There's no legal precedence to back this up, this is thoroughly untested grounds. This is actually where the buck stops with the Bleem cases: this one never went to a judgment for Bleem and hence never established precedent.

There's a pretty reasonable chance that Nintendo had a chance to win the lawsuit off of the back of this point. This doesn't make it a guarantee, but it's the part of the lawsuit that's actually important.

What happened with the settlement?

Well Nintendo got to legally extort the Yuzu devs and their parent company for $2.4 million. This is, strictly speaking, chump change to Nintendo but I in particular hate this part of lawsuits with a passion. In addition, as per the conditions of the agreement, all copies of Yuzu that were released and in development under the purvey of the company must be destroyed, the company and its devs can no longer work on Yuzu in any way possible, and they cannot work on any other emulation software. This is why Citra also closed down by the way: it was an unfortunate emulator in the cross fire. This in and of itself, is a tragedy, since this is basically court mandated brain drain. Undoubtedly Yuzu will be forked and someone will continue development on "Zuyu", but the loss is still felt.

Why should I care? Piracy is illegal.

This is where I'm going to wax philosophical for a moment, but Frankie my dear, I do not give a damn. Nintendo could have had full legal rights to do this, and I would still be of the opinion that Nintendo's legal team are ghouls and shouldn't feel safe showing their faces. This is how I felt when Nintendo shut down Emuparadise. Whether something is illegal does not impact whether it is right. Laws exist in a state of being able to be both just, unjust, or both.

Emulation is extremely important in the preservation of gaming as an artform, something that the game industry is extremely against in all forms. There's money to be made after all, and attempts at making sure that games are available to play are often attacked and criticized. This is part of the reason I'm so against the existence of copyright law. It doesn't matter what the intent of a system is, but it does matter what the system does, and it's transferred an overwhelming amount of power into the hands of large corporations while largely screwing small creators over.

I do not believe art has a price tag to it. I do not believe that art can and should only be enjoyed by the people a company has decided to sell it too. I do not believe that companies like Nintendo should be able to throw their legal weight around and ruin people's lives. You should be able to play Mother 3 and Shin Megami Tensei without having to wait for their parent companies to decide they actually want to sell it to you.

Piracy does not inflict meaningful damages to Nintendo. Despite Nintendo's whinging, Tears of the Kingdom sold over 20 million copies in half a years time, something that we can estimate to have made Nintendo about $1.4 billion in revenue. We live in a game industry which does not care about its game devs: it's perfectly willing to underpay them, to overwork them, and to eventually let them go. Nintendo is not innocent here. They have a history of mistreating their contract workers, and I personally know that these are not the only allegations that hold water.

In short, fuck Nintendo. Pirate all Switch games until the end of time.

[macleod]

I've seen a number of people on here proclaim that you should not, under no circumstances, take photos at a protest, but: Sharing photos of protests is a great way to amplify the impact of collective action, raise awareness on important issues, and encourage more people to participate.

But: We also have to keep in mind that surveillance is on the rise, including the use of facial recognition tech, which can put people at risk.

So here is a quick basic guide, courtesy of DigitalRightsWatchAU, to protecting people's biometric data when posting protest photos:

Conceal or obscure people’s faces in photos 

Before you upload photos from protests to social media, remove biometric data by concealing or obscuring people’s faces and using proper communication channels.

Use Signal. 

Signal is a great encrypted messaging app that protects your communications. It also has an in-built feature to blur out people’s faces.

We strongly recommend using Signal to communicate with people white protesting (and anytime, really!), and this added feature makes it easy to protect the identities of people in your photos. 

Be selective – choose photos that don’t show people’s faces. 

With some careful photography and curation, you can upload photos that capture the scale and energy of a protest without revealing sensitive information — no need to edit them! 

Here are some ideas:

take photos at a distance, capturing the crowd rather than individual details of faces,

position yourself behind the march, showing only the backs of heads, 

focus on signs, flags and other details to emphasise the protest vibe without showing people’s faces. 

Remember it’s good practice to ask people before taking their photo whenever you can. You can also explain to them that you just want to get their sign or outfit but not their face – let them know you want to protect their privacy! 

Extra tips:

Doing this does not remove the metadata from your image. Image metadata is generated automatically and usually includes details including the time, date, and GPS location, and information about the type of phone used – this can be used to pinpoint where you were and when. To easily remove metadata, take a screenshot on your device and delete the original. 

For extra protection, delete the original photos that show people’s faces from your phone after you have made a version that obscures the faces. Even if you don’t intend to upload them online, if your device is compromised or unlocked and you have the originals sitting there, you’ve done all that work for nothing!    

What about videos? Videos are trickier to edit to hide people’s faces and may require additional time, effort and software – this isn’t always possible while you’re on the go! We suggest focusing on minimising capturing faces in the first place when recording video footage. 

Focus on harm minimisation rather than perfection. Taking protest photos without revealing people’s faces can be hard – there are a lot of people moving around which makes it difficult. The goal is to minimise sharing others’ biometric information as much as possible. Just try your best!   

When you want to capture details: recording incidents 

Recording incidents such as use of violence by law enforcement can be a powerful tool of accountability. It pays to be prepared. 

Here are some tips from Melbourne Activist Legal Support on observing police at protests:

Record in landscape mode. It captures more of the scene. 

Hold your device steady and move it slowly. Smooth, clear footage makes better evidence. 

If taking your phone to an action, make sure you don’t take sensitive data with you. 

Context is important. Recording moments before an arrest can be as important as the arrest itself. 

Try to take clear steady images that capture the police officer’s badge name or ID number. 

Don’t hinder an arrest when observing or you may end up arrested too.   

Try not to narrate. Your recording may not capture key information if you’re speaking over it. 

Police do not have the right to hinder you recording public interactions. 

You can also check out the resources from Witness for in-depth guides to recording incidents to protect and uphold human rights. You can also get advice and tools from the National Justice Project’s CopWatch.

[foone]

So, regarding Cartrivision and how the Red Tapes were effectively play-once, this idea of "you buy/rent a tape but you can only play it for a short while" so was enticing an idea that it keeps coming back. There's obviously ways this can be implemented on streaming services, but it was tried at least twice in the optical disc era, but amusingly in two entirely different ways.

And it was backwards from how you might think. The older one seems like it should have come later!

So first was DIVX (the disc format: it's unrelated to the Codec of the same name)

This came out in 1998, just as DVD was starting to catch on. They got a bunch of movie studios to sign on to only release their films on DIVX, not DVD, and tried to backdoor the format into acceptance: it was heavily pushed by Circuit City, then a major retailer. All DIVX players were also DVD players, so they would try to convince you to buy a DIVX player so you could play both.

How it worked is pretty simple: it is basically a DVD that's been encrypted. To decrypt it, you need a license. The DIVX player can talk to the DIVX server and let you purchase a license to watch the film, and the license would be valid for 48 hours before deleting itself. So the idea was that you'd pick up a disc for very cheap, like a rental, but when you could hang onto it for later, and re-axtivate the license by just paying the license free (a couple dollars) again. And if you didn't like the movie? No need to take the film back to blockbuster, you can just toss it in the garbage! (you could also pay a higher fee to get an unlimited license to the film, effectively converting it into a DVD)

But this was 1998, remember: very few people have always-on internet. How's it talk to the DIVX server?

Simple. It's got a modem. You plug your DIVX player into the phone line, and it dials up DVD HQ and talks to them over that connection. It's a very 1990s solution.

Anyway it died. People interested in DVD universally hated the idea, especially the part where some studios were only going to release films as DIVX. People had had VHS tapes for a while now, and they were used to buying and owning their films. Going to a time-limited rental system seems like a big step back.

And of course, movie rental companies hated the idea too, as it basically would destroy them as a business (years before streaming destroyed them anyway). So they refused to entertain the idea. So it failed, and it took down Circuit City with it. The funniest part? Remember how it talks to a server? Well, guess what happened to that server when the format was discontinued!

Yep, all DIVX discs are unplayable now. They announced the discontinuation in 1999, and by 2001 the servers were turned off. All DIVX discs (even the ones upgraded to forever-playable) are just paperweights. (and btw: I've looked into the feasibility of hacking the encryption. They used 3DES, which is far from the best but is still pretty secure. Give me a million dollars and a year of computation time and I'll be able to watch one film.)

So, with DIVX dying such a quick and painful death that it took out the major retailer that invented it, surely no one else would even consider this idea again, right?

Welcome to FlexPlay. A 2003 format where you buy a DVD for cheap, and you can watch it for 24-48 hours. Even better than DIVX, because you don't need a special player and you don't even depend on talking to a server!

Wow. What weird technical tricks did they do to make this work? Is there a special program on the disc? Some kind of computer code? Special encryption? Can you only play it on a PC with some DRM software installed?

Nope! While DVDs have anti-copying DRM and DIVX added limited-playback DRM, FlexPlay goes completely the other route and has Analog Rights Management: the limited playback is enforced by CHEMISTRY.

Yep. See, the way optical discs work is by shining a layer through the clear plastic and bouncing it off a mirrored layer of aluminium in the center of the disc. (Well, for pre-pressed discs. MO and CD-R/RW discs work differently)

But FlexPlay discs add a layer of dye between the aluminum and the plastic. This dye is initially transparent to the red laser used by DVD players (did you know that's why blu-rays are called that? They use blue lasers instead of the red lasers used by DVD , and the infrared lasers used by CDs), so it can be read just fine.

But they made the dye react with oxygen. As soon as the airless bag the disc is stored in is opened, the dye starts darkening, eventually becoming unreadable. So once you have opened the disc, you better watch it soon, or it will be unreadable.

This format technically lived on until 2011 before being discontinued, but it doesn't seem like it was terribly popular at any point. Part of this was probably that it couldn't live up to the dream of selling a film on a disc you made for pennies, and making tons of profit. Making the discs was tricky, as you had to make them in special inert-atmosphere conditions to keep them from prematurely darkening.

Anyway the final joke of FlexPlay is that they haven't been made since 2011, and while they were sold in air-tight packages, nothing is PERFECTLY airtight. So all the ones for sale have had the bags leak over the last 12+ years, and are prematurely unreadable. Whoops.

Anyway now that physical media is dead, movie companies finally have their time-limited rental they've always wanted. Streaming makes this trivial.

And two final notes:

1. There's not really any lost-media risk with these two formats. All DIVX-only films were later released on DVD when the format ranked. And all FlexPlay films had already gotten DVD releases, so there was never any risk.

2. My buddy Technology Connections did a video in FlexPlay a while ago, if you want to learn more about it.

[nephilimbrute]

Yo, how you doin' ? Did you play Side Order ? What are your (gay) though ?

i'm doin alriighhtt :3 i didn't play side order actually (I don't have a switch.) but i went through a gameplay with my friend and i'm scrounging up more lore >w< we were freaking tf out the whole time. especially me. i was screaming at every cutscene

like when marina showed us her computer background i goofy-screamed Out Loud (i probably did that like 8 times in total). there's literally No straight explanation for that, pearl's literally holding marina's zipper in that and he's laying down. nonone has a pic of their Best Friend (heavy quotes) laying down smiling all pretty and handsome like that

OHHHHH THIS ONEEE😭😭😭my girl is literally tearing up she's so happy😭😭😭😭😭 all the dev diaries were sooooo fwjgwgkxkgwkhcjcxjg😭😭😭😭

AND ALL THE PEARLINA???????? my GOD this girl is crazy i hate them so much!!!! /affectionate

jesus CHRIST girl pull yourself toGETHER... "aw pearlie! you say the coolest things" "she's sooooo coool" "pearl, don't drool over my diaries. i'm right here!" "i can't help it! pearl's just too precious. she's fearless at the core and adorable on top!" among many other marina quotes. i'm speechless

and ohhhhhh dedf1sh's letters😭😭😭😭 little marina i can't do this. i get so emotional when i see her, she was just a kid😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭AHHHHHJJJJJJJ😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

marina's hyperfixation on excavators persists. she's such a nerdddddd!!!!!!!

and ughhhghhghjf marina agitando. i was freaking out so bad when i saw her AND PARALLEL CANON. the lore implications THE LORE IMPLICATIONS×@!!!!! this also gives me some new content to use in my AU.....devilish

i said this before but the Order you see in the dlc is in my AU as a type of malware that marina created for herself. she encrypts it into the personal software she uses as an attempt to. self destruct (off) herself. but (Un)fortunately it didn't work. she's just stuck forever wallowing in her own grief

the memverse in my AU is where marina puts everyone she has under her mind control thingy. they're all hooked into the same memverse, marina has her own that she messes with to see the possible consequences of every action she does and. stuff.

and i also said this on my alt twt acc but in the Normal Side Order(...??) my agent 4 turns into parallel canon either voluntarily or unvoluntarily. and since there's others with him i decided to make them robotic clones of 8 and cap3. and they only serve to mock agent 8 and what little they remember of their lovers and themself, a materialized deteriorating memory

tbh i was more focused on the theme of side order instead of dedf1sh stuck in the elevator with two lesbians that would do the unthinkable if they weren't there

here's how i see it. so much for your memories fading away while you are actively trying to get them back

i also kept freaking out At dedf1sh. i shouted them for to get off the screen each time they popped up (also affectionate). creepy zombie GET OUT. dedf1sh and their dumb puppy eyes

unconscience is sooooo good i only listened to it twice and if i did any more times i would be gone and in the woods somewhere

i loved all the bosses.........marina and parallel are my favs....also rondo. That thing's so horrifying i love it. when i saw it i was like "what kind of panopticon shit is this....." and was absolutely THRILLED! to see that it was actually based on a panopticon as well as the floor level (0ct0ptic0n)

and these album covers??????they're so fucking AWESOMEEEEeee i love the album art of splatoon. when i saw all the stuff in alterna i was so amazed. the gear is so awesome too i wish i played splatoon. i'd grind the shit out of side order tbh......smollusk is so cute the. Awwww awww

also this dlc made me realize i'm a big machine but make it girly

as Side Order C.E.O i feasted GOOD this was a bountiful harvest

[mostlysignssomeportents]

No True Apple User (transcript of a Twitter exchange)

Benedict Evans: Different people prefer different trade-offs. The important thing is to understand that these are mostly trade-offs - and about one and a half billion people like the trade-offs that Apple makes

My reply:

Before Apple offered one-click opt-out from FB tracking in iOS, it could have been argued that Apple users like Facebook's "trade-off." After all, they all signed up for FB and kept using it. But once there was an opt-out for surveillance, >96% of Apple users took it (and FB lost $10B in the first year). 

FB offered a bargain, and Apple helped its users make a counteroffer. That's a common practice in tech, as old as the first third-party drive for an IBM 360.

This practice (“adversarial interoperability“), greatly benefited Apple in the past, e.g., when Apple reverse-engineered MS Office's file-formats for  iWork, reversing losses due to the poor compatibility between Win Offce and Mac Office.

MS would have argued that the legions of users defecting from MacOS for Windows in order to enjoy high-reliabliity interchange between Office docs preferred that trade-off - yes, users liked MacOS, but they liked reliable collaboration more.

iWork revealed this trade-off for the false choice it was: you could use MacOS and you could reliably exchange files with Windows users. 

In other words, you could bargain.

Trade-offs without bargaining don't reveal users' preferences (what they'd like in the best of all worlds). Rather, they tell us about users' tolerance. 

Users would tolerate Windows as a condition for reliable collaboration. They'd prefer MacOS and reliable collaboration.

iOS  users would tolerate Facebook spying on them via their iPhones, but they'd prefer to use Facebook on iOS without being spied upon.

Which explains why FB has gone to such enormous lengths to present take-it-or-leave offers to its users - it knows that the company's preferences are totally disconnected from its customers' preferences.

FB would prefer to spy on you with every hour that god sends, and make this surveillance a precondition for participating in the community, family life, civics, and commerce that lives inside its walled garden.

FB users would like to do all those things...and not be spied upon.

And because it is always technically possible to make tracker-blockers, ad-blockers, alternative clients, etc, the only way FB can win that  contest is to make it illegal for users to get their way.

For example, FB can entice, funnel or coerce its users into primarily interacting with its services via apps. Because apps are encrypted, they can't be lawfully reverse-engineered and altered without risking "anti circumvention" liability.

You can make an ad-blocker for the web because you don't need to bypass a technical protection measure to block web-ads. But do the same thing for apps and you risk a 5-year prison sentence and a $500k fine.

Apple is an enthusiastic proponent of this regime, because  it's the primary means by which the firm prevents third parties from offering rival app stores.

Apple's argument is that having a legal right to decide which software its customers can install allows it to act as its customers' proxy. If Apple can override the choices made by its users, it can prevent them from making bad choices.

Moreover, Apple can bargain with large firms whose take-it-or-leave-it offers would otherwise impose hardship on its users. An individual user who objects to FB spying is out of luck.

But Apple can say to FB, "We have blocked spying, and your only choice is to leave the app store altogether, or suck it up." In other words, Apple can give FB the same take-it-or-leave-it treatment that FB imposes on 3b users, which is a delicious irony.

Hearing FB squeal that Apple is exercising its market power - derived from the fact that billions of people can only be reached by subjecting oneself to the conditions of Apple's walled garden - to harm FB's interests is such a sweet bit of comeuppance.

But the sweetness has a bitter core, because Apple also spies on iOS users, even those who opt out of app-based surveillance, in exactly the same way that FB does, for exactly the same purpose (ad targeting) - and they deceive their users about it.

And, like FB, Apple devotes enormous lobbying efforts and legal resources to increase the legal risk of allowing users to express their preferences (as opposed to just their tolerance) for Apple's trade-offs.

If Apple users preferred to be shut out of  shopping around for app stores, or if they preferred to only get their devices repaired at official, Apple-sanctioned repair depots, or if they preferred to be blocked from using refurb parts, Apple wouldn't have to do anything. It could save millions of dollars in engineering and legal bills.

 But Apple behaves as if it believes its users strongly prefer to have more choice, even if they'll tolerate less choice.

Now, there's a "No true Apple user" rejoinder to this argument: "You knew when you bought an iPhone that it came shackled to Apple's commercial imperatives, which could be enforced through legal action by wielding the DMCA, patent, copyright, CFAA, tortious interference, etc. If you didn't like it, you could have bought an Android device, or no device at all.“ 

But that same argument can (and was) made by FB, to Apple: 

"Those users for whom you blocked our surveillance knew the deal: sign up for FB, get spied on. No one forces anyone to sign up for FB. You can use Mastodon. Or you can just use FB on the web only, and run tracker/ad blockers. They may have preferred surveillance-free socializing, but they tolerated the 'trade-off' of being spied on."

Apple has repeatedly demonstrated that it is an imperfect proxy for its customers' interests. And Apple behaves as if it believes that its users strongly prefer a different trade-off, and takes heroic measures to prevent anyone from doing unto Apple as Apple did unto MS and FB.

Firms are neither intrinsically good, nor are they intrinsically evil. They respond to incentives and constraints. The possibility that users might bargain back against a proposed trade-off makes those proposed trade-offs fairer, on average.

If a firm knows an obnoxious course of action will trigger users taking a step to block, reconfigure, or modify some or all of its products and service, it has to weigh those costs against the expected parochial distributional benefits from imposing bad trade-offs on its users.

Firms that aren't subject to discipline from user defection, modding, etc, are prone to folly - they arrogantly overreach. Users experience harms as a result, and it's only when those harms accumulate to the point where tolerance for the 'trade-off' runs out that the harm ceases.

Preferences are revealed by user conduct, sure - but the extent to which a preference can be revealed is limited by the extent to which it can be technologically expressed.

A world in which there are extensive legal restrictions on users expressing their preferences is a world in which successful trade-offs tell us little about users' preferences.

And a firm that goes to lengths to expand and invoke those legal restrictions tells on itself, revealing its own secret belief that it is imposing a trade-off on its users that the users would gladly jettison... if they could.

ETA: Evans replied:

Sending over two dozen tweets is not good faith engagement in a conversation - rather, this is what in other contexts is called a Gish Gallop.

Meanwhile, it's almost about FB and Windows. This is deflection and whataboutery. I made one very specific point about the trade-offs between security and flexibility on the iPhone. Those trade-offs are real - that is not debatable. The only debate is which to choose.

[Image ID: An Apple 'Privacy. That's iPhone.' ad. The three rear-facing camera lenses have been replaced by the staring, red eye of HAL9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey.]

(Image: Cryteria, CC BY 3.0, modified)

[poppyxz]

CODE WAR - Three Days (Chapter Two)

Chapter One:

You contain your nervousness as you push the wheels of your chair through the corridors. "What does Price want with me?", "Are they whispering about me?"... Screw it, you think, trying to push those useless thoughts away. Now, standing in front of his office door, you knock twice and hear a muffled "Enter."

Price is standing, leaning against the rectangular office desk, and points to a spot in front of him. "At least he didn't ask me to sit," you laugh internally at your own joke as you wheel over.

"So, sir?" you ask.

He clears his throat and begins:

"Has Soap tried to tell you about what's happening? He mentioned that you could help..."

He asks casually, shuffling through some papers as he leans over the desk. "My file?..." you wonder, eyes fixed on him, but then you respond:

"Mactavish is quite the chatterbox, isn't he?" you sigh with a light laugh, but quickly return to seriousness.

"Yes, he told me some things... he said things were tense and that—"

"That's right," he cuts you off, now looking at one of the papers in his hands. Your file.

"Sniper with the codename Raven... It says here that your academic background is in software engineering," he flips through the pages. "Do you have hacking skills?" he asks, looking at you.

"Yes, sir, but—"

"Great," he interrupts again, now with an urgent tone. "We need your skills."

He turns and sits in the chair behind the desk, opens a drawer beside him, and retrieves a small object, placing it on the desk in front of you. "A... flash drive?"

"We found this in one of our latest operations," he says. "I think they left it behind in a hurry. And well... it's completely encrypted," he rests his hands on his mouth as he watches you. "Can you do something? We haven't found any breaches yet."

"What could be on it?" you ask, examining the flash drive.

"Well, that's your job," he says, smiling as he crosses his arms.

"I'll do my best... permission to start, sir?"

"Of course, but first, how about meeting the rest of the team?" he gets up and touches your shoulder. "Sorry for not asking about your situation... are you okay, soldier?" he asks softly as he heads to the door.

"Ah, it's fine, I don't use the crutches out of laziness," you laugh quietly as you follow him.

Price's boots echo through the ethereal, empty corridor, accompanied by the soft sound of your wheelchair's wheels rolling slowly.

"Here," he signals, already opening the door, giving you passage.

As you enter the room, you see the rest of the team gathered around a large conference table. They greet you with small nods, while Soap offers a subtle smile. However, some of the members' looks don't go unnoticed by you.

Ghost tilts his head slightly, seeming curious about your situation. König narrows his eyes slightly but maintains his composure. Laswell gives a brief assessment before nodding. And Gaz seems already familiar with you.

Your analysis is interrupted when Price begins:

"Let me introduce them to you," he says, moving towards the table. "This is Ghost, our infiltration specialist. Next to him is Gaz, our tactical operations man. Here we have König, responsible for the heavy lifting, and Laswell, our intelligence analyst. Look for her if you need anything."

Finally, he points to Soap.

"This one, of course, you already know," Price concludes, sitting at the table.

"Yes..." you confirm, approaching the table between Gaz and Soap. "It's a pleasure to meet you all," you say with a brief and friendly smile. Before a moment of silence sets in, Laswell interrupts:

"Our hacker girl, huh?" she nods and slides a laptop across the table to you. "This will be your companion. It's fully anonymous and equipped with everything you need."

You thank her and run your fingers over the laptop, opening it. Moving slightly away from the table to focus and start the process of analyzing the encrypted flash drive on it.

Laswell and the rest of the team give you one last look before resuming a strategic discussion. Price starts outlining possible scenarios and action plans if the flash drive's data confirms their suspicions and potential traitors.

................

Your eyes are fixed on the screen. When you connect the flash drive, a series of encrypted lines and data fill the display. Sequences of seemingly random characters like "9f6a3b4d2e1c..." and "a5b7c9d3e8f1" mix with blocks of hexadecimal text (4A6F686E20446F6) and binary (01001000).

Soap approaches and gently touches your shoulder, giving a brief stroke with his thumb. "What do you think? Any leads?" he asks, bringing you back to the room.

"This is well-protected, it will definitely take some time," you respond, shaking your head while your eyes remain fixed on the screen. "Now I understand why there are so many 'virgins' trying to find a breach in it."

"That also makes you a 'virgin,' right?" Soap laughs.

"That's not what I meant," you roll your eyes but can't help but laugh a little at your own slip.

Suddenly, Ghost stands up enough to make the chair scrape the floor, drawing everyone's attention.

"Really? Now is not the time for that." He interrupts, with a slight irritation in his voice and a furrowed look.

You clear your throat. "You're right, sorry..."

"You said it would take time, right?" he asks seriously.

"Yes, it will... but—"

"Then don't waste time with these jokes," he concludes, sitting back in the chair.

You return your attention to the laptop screen. The room around you goes silent, and for a moment, you feel Ghost's watchful eyes on you. The pressure becomes palpable, making your skin prickle, but Price quickly notices.

"I think that's enough for today, reach out to any of us when you make progress." He says, as he gets up and ready to leave. "Do you want me to give you a deadline?" he asks, looking at you.

You nod. "Three days," he responds firmly.

He and the others start heading for the exit of the meeting room. Before they leave, Laswell and Gaz give you a farewell look, which you promptly return. Soap hesitates for a moment, but Ghost pulls on his tactical uniform. König is the last to leave, closing the door silently.

"Can I do this? Three days..." you think, anxious, as you lean your head on the back of the chair, looking at the gray ceiling.

-----------------

autor's note: This chapter is a bit longer. I hope it's good 😊. I was unsure about the raven; in my country, there is no distinction. Also, I don't know how to link the first chapter nicely 😔.

Chapter Three: