In talking about Chaucer (p. 74), I said that, in general, puns and verbal connections of sound were unimportant and not to be sought out; and now, you will say, I have been using them to explain cruces in Shakespeare. Alas, you have touched on a sore point; this is one of the less reputable aspects of our national poet.
A quibble is to Shakespeare [Johnson could not but confess] what luminous vapours are to the traveller; he follows it at all adventures; it is sure to lead him out of his way and sure to engulf him in the mire. It has some malignant power over his mind.... A quibble was for him the fatal Cleopatra for whom he lost the world, and was content to lose it.
Nor can I hold out against the Doctor, beyond saying that life ran very high in those days, and that he does not seem to have lost the world so completely after all. It shows lack of decision and will-power, a feminine pleasure in yielding to the mesmerism of language, in getting one's way, if at all, by deceit and flattery, for a poet to be so fearfully susceptible to puns. Many of us could wish the Bard had been more manly in his literary habits, and I am afraid the Sitwells are just as bad.
William Empson, 7 Types of Ambiguity, ch 2 pp 100-101
i'm sorry this is so fucking funny. that pathetic loser shakespeare who loved puns so much it cost him everything, except of course his status as the most famous, most read, most immortal english-language author of all time. but everything else, he lost and it's all because of how weak he was to resist a pun :/ pouring one out for my sad little girly man who could have had it all if only he was better at writing, the thing he is the most famous guy in the world for.
even empson, who disagrees with johnson that shakespeare "lost the world", is like, too bad our favorite poet is susceptible to the thing that made him famous :/ really tragic that the guy whose wordplay we've been talking about for 300 years likes wordplay :///
also i can't get over writing a book about the types of ambiguity and NOT INCLUDING PUNS?? sorry but puns are ambiguous! that's where their juice comes from! imagine liking ambiguity so much you write a book about it but never mention puns except to dunk on them. imagine being a POET and POETRY CRITIC who looks down on sound-based ambiguity! could not be me!!
13 notes
·
View notes
what do you do in the theater!
hiii well the primary answer is that i'm a student. the other answer is a little bit of everything lol. but my main passion is in directing! i've directed... 5 (soon to be 6ish) full length shakespeare shows since i was 17 & founded my own theater company to do it + i also started/lead a student theater organization at my college bc i have a starting-things problem (which means i also do the marketing & budgeting & organization which is simply too much on top of being a full time student so things slip . often). but tbh there is no part of theater that does not captivate me in some way..... i love lighting design and costume design and wish i had the time to get better at both, i'm stage managing my first full production this semester (!), i'm trying to sink more time into playwriting and devising new shows, i love teaching/working with younger actors..... that's a good enough summary lol anyway read theater of the unimpressed by jordan tannahill <3
6 notes
·
View notes
I'm so embarrassed 😨
I haven't opened Tumblr anywhere but mobile in so long 😂
that I forgot my desktop theme is still Harry Potter based 🤮
I'm trying very hard to move on from that time in my life, and to prove that I've grown as a person. 🤗
thank you all for your understanding 😇
2 notes
·
View notes