#designing transport infrastructure

[thebreakfastgod]

America's Roads: Dangerous by Design

[ceilidhtransing]

I've been thinking about urbanism and about how some people (I'm particularly thinking folks like “the vocal minority of business owners that go absolutely apeshit any time there's a proposal to remove some space from cars in favour of a bike lane, a tram line, a pedestrianised area, etc”) don't seem to really consider anyone outside a car to be a person.

*a city plans to remove some parking spaces to make room for a protected bike lane*

“But how is anyone supposed to get here?!”

*looks at bustling street filled with pedestrians, cyclists, and people riding a tram*

Like, it genuinely doesn't seem to occur to some people that all of those people moving around outside of cars are people. That's how “anyone is supposed to get here”: by way of all of the non-car options, especially those that are actively made safer and easier by the removal or limiting of space for cars. And I don't know what's going on here - whether it's something like classism (only those wealthy enough to drive everywhere matter as people) or simply that car dependency is perhaps so entrenched and unquestioned for some folk that it genuinely doesn't occur to them that getting to a place without a car is (or at least should be) an entirely valid and possible thing to do. It's probably a bit of both. But my god does it drive me nuts when people respond to a new proposal that will dramatically increase the capacity and footfall of an urban space by shifting from emphasising cars to emphasising walking, cycling and public transport with “but how will anyone get here?!”

[atlurbanist]

It's taking too long to get safe routes for cyclists in Atlanta.

While looking at Google Maps photos of Boulevard (this is a couple of blocks south of North Avenue) I spotted a couple of cyclists grappling with the mixed traffic on this six-lane street.

Why have we not put bike lanes here for safety? This isn't a state road that we don't control. It's a city street that we could change tomorrow.

Why does this mess of a car-sewer still exist in 2024?

On the Atlanta DOT website, the plans for a "complete street" redesign for this part of Boulevard only state "consideration for bike lanes" 🙄 (meanwhile a linked PDF shows a concept with no bike lanes.)

Also, the project start is 2016, and the end is 2028. Ugh. This should not be acceptable by anyone in our city government. Atlanta voters have approved special taxes *twice* in the last 10 years for safer streets.

Aside from the special taxes, Atlanta is a gentrifying city with escalating land values that should be funding improvements with equitable results.

The fact that we still have a major lack of safe routes for cycling in much of the city, especially on major routes like this, is ridiculous.

[atlantathecity]

Atlanta is now producing the kind of protected bike lanes we should have been building long ago, as seen here on Bill Kennedy Way. It's good progress.

But we still need to address those older ones (like the unprotected lane on Edgewood Ave) where cars can get in.

If there's truly no room in the width of the street for a fully protected lane, I wonder if we could consider a bold redesign that slows cars dramatically and creates a safe shared space?

[theartisticcrow]

This is a post about light pollution and my absolute hatred of modern architecture and outdoor lighting.

This is not going to be a short post, but I had to get this anger and frustration off of my chest. Writing is the best way I know how to do that.

I have seen a great many stars fall from the sky. Most recently when I was out in the field in front of my house, roughly a month ago, and I was wandering around, listening to Queen on my headphones, and as I looked over towards the road, I saw a star fall from the sky. I stood there for a moment, unmoving, staring up at the part of the sky where I saw that beautiful flash of light as one life ended and it felt as though mine had only recently begun, and I thought to myself how this one was different from others that I had seen. It lasted longer, about two full seconds. I continued walking, a little happy yet also a little sad. How tragic it is, what humans will do to obtain power. They oppress people, they choose the cheapest options to save money that they do not need, and rarely do they seem to think things through. They'll do anything to get the people into their grasp. They will even steal the sky from us.

How fascinated we used to be with the stars, but not anymore, because the night sky looked so much different three hundred, four hundred years ago. People used to be able to look out their windows at night and see the entire galaxy. What do we get? A few specks of light scattered throughout the sky if we're lucky? If it is not a boring, grey abyss? I should not have to drive four days into the middle of the wilderness to see the night sky as it truly is. No one should have to put up with this. I remember, when I was fourteen or thirteen, when they built a big house on the property next to where I lived, with blacked out windows, a basketball court and a swimming pool. The owners were rarely ever there, and when they were, they were terribly obnoxious with their parties and loud music, perhaps not realising how exactly sound manages to travel through that part of the island. And yet, for some reason, they felt the need to install a big floodlight which did not even shine onto their own property, but rather the field in front of my house. It shined directly into my parents window, and so often did I wish I could shoot it with an arrow. Now, my family did not own the property that we lived on. We rented a house there and in the day, the property functioned as a business. I recall the day that they installed a floodlight shining over the small parking lot. I hated it then and I still hate it now. The only reason I did not throw rocks at it until it broke was because I did not want to accidentally set fire to the building, or get evicted. Not to mention, my parents would know that it was I who knocked down the light.

But it was so frustrating, because no one is there at night except for my family and our neighbours (until the landlord kicked them out so that she could use the space as her own personal office), so why should they need a floodlight at all? And why must it stretch so far across the property? I did not live out in the middle of nowhere, as much as it used to feel like it at times. There was plenty forest and farmland surrounding the area, but beyond that was just city and suburbs. It used to feel like the only place where you didn't have to see the ugly architecture of the city, but even it caught up eventually. The house that the obnoxious neighbours built was only one example. In the distant hills, there appeared more lights than there used to be, and when I stood at the top of the hill on the property and looked out over the land, I did not used to be able to see the cranes in the distance constructing five or seven story condos. I used to not have to worry about security cameras watching me. I used to be able to wander around in darkness. I used to be able to see the stars. There were many stars at one point, scattered throughout the night sky. It was not the entire galaxy, but it was still a nice sight. I used to see the stars, and now I get little more than the big dipper constellation. Some nights, I am not sure that I can see anything at all, especially when it is a night where there are more cars passing by than usual, and you cannot even see the road when they pass, because their headlights are so unnecessarily blinding.

The night itself used to have a different colour: orange and yellowish, not horrifically bright, but now it is plagued by sterile white lights. I might like to write a complaint to whichever council, board, or committee is in charge of architecture and construction and suchlike in this city, if only I knew how. But even then, I have little belief that it would make a difference, for I would be only one voice with no one to join me. We are capable of change, I am sure of it, but if only I knew exactly how. If only I knew exactly who were the right people to talk to, how to reach them, and what to say. If only more people knew how, then maybe we could recognise that we are not alone. People don't see the point in trying, for they do not feel like putting in that sort of effort because they do not believe it will make a difference if they as an individual do not participate. But tell me, how many individuals think that? How many of you people believe that your voice does not make a difference? Alone, it might not, but when placed among thousands of others who share that same belief, it makes a huge difference! Imagine what we could achieve if we all stood up together and called for action. Imagine if people realised just how much they are actually capable of, and imagine if they actually took the steps to do that thing.

It is not impossible that I could make a revolutionary change in my country, or my community at least, if I really put my mind to it. If I gathered people together, devised some kind of plan, or used all of my writing capabilities to speak against what I believe the government is doing wrong, it's not unrealistic to say that I could make an impact. Now imagine if an entire city's worth of people did that. Do you know how much is actually possible? Do you know how much could have already happened if we didn't wait until the fate of the world was on the line? If only I knew exactly how. If only I had the resources and information. If only I was more willing to take up more responsibility and actually start trying to do something. Ah, but what might parents say if I told them I needed to be driven to the post office to send a letter addressed to the city council? I'm sure they'd be supportive, but it might be an awkward conversation, especially if they tell me it probably won't do anything. And alas, I am a coward.

Look at this entire post. Look at what I have managed to write on such short notice because I felt like it. Imagine what I could do if I were given the right opportunity. This entire post, and all because I was pissed that I could barely see the northern lights those few months ago when it was the only chance I might ever get, only to be disappointed because of that FUCKING FLOODLIGHT THAT MY BITCH OF A LANDLORD DECIDED TO INSTALL FOR NO FUCKING REASON.

[mysticdragon3md3]

More Lanes are (Still) a Bad Thing by Not Just Bikes

[eelhound]

"People don’t take public transit because it’s not giving them what they want. Some of this is because of a decades-long history of bad American land use policies which have encouraged the development of places that require a car to get around. Undoing car-centric sprawl is a very long-term project, but well-designed, well-run transit can be successful even in places seemingly ill-suited for it. Houston, for instance, redesigned its bus routes with a focus on giving people frequent, reliable service and saw a substantial increase in ridership. Charlotte’s light rail system has seen healthy ridership numbers and boosted development. The U.S. is not automatically doomed to have unreliable public transit that serves as the 'locomotion of last resort.' As Bloomberg notes,

There are good, viable models of transit systems that … are successful both at attracting riders and at being financially viable, from places that have more in common with American cities than one might expect…. [Yet] all too often, transit planners—and even advocates—find themselves resigned to fatalism about the prospect of transit in American suburbs. They’re convinced that these spread-out and car-centric spaces are fundamentally irreconcilable with public transportation.

Christof Spieler’s fascinating book Trains, Buses, People: An Opinionated Atlas of U.S. Transit profiles the transit systems of dozens of U.S. cities, showing how some places are succeeding where others are failing, and demonstrating the principles that make for quality transit that attracts riders.

Some of those principles are straightforward. Jarrett Walker’s Human Transit: How Clearer Thinking about Public Transit Can Enrich Our Communities and Our Lives lists seven demands that potential public transit riders have, which will determine whether they decide to actually use the system:

It takes me where I want to go.

It takes me when I want to go.

It is a good use of my time.

It is a good use of my money.

It respects me in the level of safety, comfort, and amenity it provides.

I can trust it.

It gives me freedom to change my plans.

Seems straightforward, but plenty of cities lack transit systems that meet the criteria. For instance, here in New Orleans, the average person can reach 89 percent of the jobs in the area with a 30-minute commute via car. They can only reach 12 percent of area jobs with a 30-minute commute on public transit. This means that those who can’t afford cars are severely limited in the work they can accept. Transit is not taking them where they want to go.

A lot of transit systems are disappointing because they’re not built around reaching these intuitively obvious basic goals. But when public transit delivers great service at a low cost, people will use it. Plenty of improvements can occur without redesigning entire cities, and Walker argues that cities often measure the wrong things, seeing expanding transit in terms of adding more miles of rail or making sure the entire city is covered by bus routes. Such approaches may appear successful because they make lots of impressive lines on a map (and allow for mayoral ribbon-cutting ceremonies), but cities can end up spending a lot of money to serve areas with few riders.

Some improvements that attract new riders are decidedly unromantic. Increasing the frequency that buses arrive, for instance, makes it much easier to incorporate bus travel into one’s day, which is why part of Houston’s bus system overhaul focused on frequency. ('Frequency is freedom,' Walker says.) Dedicated bus lanes and stoplights that give buses priority will keep buses from getting stuck in traffic. Making sure the routes, fares, and schedule are all easy to understand will make transit less of a headache, and thus make people more likely to consider it. It should be obvious: the more public transit is an attractive alternative to driving, the more people are likely to consider it. In general, research shows that the thing people want most is for the transit system to get them places efficiently; they don’t care nearly as much about whether they’re riding a beautiful, comfortable train or a janky old bus (so long as that bus is reliable).

[Elon] Musk, then, is right that the central measure of public transit’s success is whether it gets you where you want to go, but he’s wrong in thinking that cars will always and everywhere beat public transit on this measure. We can have a public transit paradise, but we have to keep the goals in mind. Public transit should not just serve as a form of unsatisfactory transportation welfare for the carless. It should be able to liberate all of us from dreadful, environmentally harmful commutes in vehicles. We need to be committed to mass transit that truly serves the people, that people do not take because they have to, but take because they want to. It can be done, but getting world-class mass transit in the U.S. will require taking on the Koch brothers and steadily redesigning cities, in ways both small and large, to be for people rather than their cars." - Nathan J. Robinson, from "We Can Have a Public Transit Paradise." Current Affairs, 9 October 2022.

[biglisbonnews]

What Does a Green City Look Like? Equitable, Connected and Nature-Positive. There is no question that for the world to successfully slow and mitigate the effects of climate change, cities will need to transform. Currently, urban areas consume 78% of the world’s energy supply and produce over 60% of global greenhouse gas emissions. By ... https://thecityfix.com/blog/what-does-a-green-city-look-like-equitable-connected-and-nature-positive/

[diamondcoins]

[msamba]

Only In Japan

Only In Japan 🇯🇵 pic.twitter.com/p7vdQSpj8o— World's Amazing Things (@Hana_b30) July 15, 2024

[little-p-eng-engineering]

Transforming the Landscape of Bulk Material Management through Structural and Mechanical Design

Across the vast expanse of industrial operations, where bulk material management is paramount, Little P.Eng. Engineering has etched a significant mark. The firm's reputation in structural and mechanical design extends beyond just equipment, touching several critical aspects of material management. This article will delve into how Little P.Eng. Engineering is transforming four pivotal sectors: Material Handling Facilities & Building, Bulk Material Transport, Bulk Material Treatment, and Bulk Material Transfer.

Little P.Eng. Engineering is an American / Canadian company that provides economical bulk material handling engineering services that are designed to meet the specific needs of our customers. We have a long history of partnering with supervisors, engineers, planners, and vendors, across a wide variety of industries to provide bulk material handling engineering solutions and systems that improve safety and productivity. Whether you need help designing, installing or maintaining any aspect of your bulk material system, we have the skills and experience to meet your needs.

Our bulk material handling engineering specialists can re-engineer and upgrade existing systems while providing customer solutions and processes. We work with customers through every part of the engineering process to create a one-stop destination for all their needs.

We also work to provide superior customer service that extends well beyond the initial installation or execution of a solution. Our customers can contact us and receive immediate assistance whenever needed for continued support that keeps businesses up and running without having to worry about delays or downtime.

1. Material Handling Facilities & Building

Material handling facilities are the heartbeats of many industries. From mining to agriculture and manufacturing, they facilitate the smooth and efficient movement of bulk materials.

Understanding Infrastructure Needs: Little P.Eng. Engineering begins its design process with a comprehensive study of the client's requirements. The aim is to understand the volume of material to be handled, the rate of throughput, and the kind of materials involved.

Structural Integrity: Buildings designed for material handling need robust foundations. Little P.Eng. ensures that every facility they design can withstand the tremendous loads and stresses associated with bulk material handling.

Optimized Workflow Design: Beyond just structural integrity, Little P.Eng. focuses on creating a streamlined workflow within these buildings. Through the strategic placement of equipment, chutes, conveyors, and storage areas, they ensure that materials move seamlessly, minimizing disruptions and maximizing efficiency.

Innovation at the Forefront: Little P.Eng. is known for incorporating innovative solutions like automated sorting systems, advanced ventilation systems, and sustainable energy solutions, making these facilities both state-of-the-art and environmentally responsible.

2. Bulk Material Transport

Once materials are sourced and sorted, they need to be transported. Little P.Eng. Engineering has a vast portfolio of solutions tailored to this very requirement.

Vehicle Design: Depending on the type of material, the firm designs transport vehicles, whether trucks, railcars, or even conveyor systems. Their designs emphasize both capacity and safety, ensuring that large volumes can be transported without risks.

Infrastructure Design: Little P.Eng. also specializes in designing transport-related infrastructure. This includes everything from loading and unloading docks to advanced conveyor belt systems and even pneumatic transport solutions.

Addressing Challenges: Transporting bulk material is fraught with challenges like spillage, degradation, and contamination. Little P.Eng.'s designs account for these challenges, providing solutions such as sealed transport containers and dust suppression systems.

3. Bulk Material Treatment

Treatment of bulk materials, whether it's refining, purification, or simply grading, is a complex process. Little P.Eng.'s role in this domain is critical.

Treatment Facility Design: Little P.Eng. engineers facilities where bulk materials undergo various treatment processes. Their designs accommodate equipment like crushers, separators, graders, and more, ensuring they operate at optimal capacities.

Safety and Compliance: Treatment processes can sometimes involve chemicals or generate waste. Little P.Eng. prioritizes safety and regulatory compliance, designing facilities that minimize environmental impact and risks to workers.

Energy Efficiency: Many treatment processes are energy-intensive. Recognizing this, Little P.Eng. incorporates energy-saving solutions, from efficient machinery layouts to the use of alternative energy sources, thus driving down operational costs.

4. Bulk Material Transfer

Transferring bulk materials from one point to another, or even from one mode of transport to another, is a task that requires precision and speed.

Transfer Point Design: Little P.Eng. is adept at creating transfer points that minimize material loss. Whether it's transferring grain from a truck to a silo or coal from a railcar to a ship, their designs ensure smooth transitions.

Material Integrity: When transferring materials, there's a risk of contamination or degradation. Little P.Eng. addresses this by designing enclosed transfer systems or integrating rapid sealing mechanisms.

Automation and Technology: In an age of technology, Little P.Eng. leverages advanced automation systems in their transfer point designs. This not only speeds up the transfer process but also reduces human errors.

Little P.Eng.'s Journey to Excellence

At its core, Little P.Eng. Engineering’s success can be attributed to its comprehensive approach. Instead of viewing these four sectors in isolation, they consider them parts of a holistic system. Their designs, thus, seamlessly integrate across the spectrum, from handling facilities to transfer points.

Client-Centric Approach

Little P.Eng. has always prioritized the unique requirements of its clients. They understand that every industry and even individual businesses within those industries can have varying needs. This client-centric approach has resulted in solutions that aren't just efficient but are also tailored to the specific challenges and objectives of their clientele.

Embracing Future Challenges

As the world continues to evolve, so do the challenges associated with bulk material management. Little P.Eng. Engineering, with its commitment to research, innovation, and adaptability, is well-equipped to tackle these challenges head-on.

With a growing demand for efficiency, safety, and sustainability, industries will find in Little P.Eng. a partner that's not just equipped to meet these demands but one that's committed to exceeding expectations.

In the world of bulk material management, Little P.Eng. Engineering stands tall, not just as a solution provider but as an innovator and trailblazer. Through their expertise in structural and mechanical design across the four critical sectors detailed in this article, they're not just shaping industries but also the very future of bulk material management.

Little P.Eng. Engineering’s Bulk Material Handling Team is a dynamic and diverse group with experience in conveying systems – mechanical and pneumatic; chutes transfers, dust control & collection, etc. Our experience in material handling for the power and manufacturing industries will provide rapid development of realistic concepts, and reliable designs which optimize operating and maintenance cost for your project. Our goal will be to not only deliver successful design to the field but to provide you with the information you need to make informed decisions to meet your objectives.

Industries served through our Bulk Material Handling Engineering Services

Grains​

Mining​

Mills​

Metals​

Manufacturing​

Maintenance​

Fabrication​

Agriculture​

Packaging​

Safety​

Fire & Explosion​

Ship/Barge Loading & Unloading​

Steel and Metals Industry

Energy and Power Generation Industry

Water and Wastewater Industry

Oil & Gas Industry

Chemicals and Plastics Industry

Pulp & Paper Industry

Facility Services

Residential Buildings Sector

Hospitality and Hotel Sector

Commercial Buildings Sectors

Sports and Stadia Buildings Sector

Education Buildings Sector

Government Buildings Sector

Hospitals Engineering Services

Biotech / Pharmaceutical – Engineering Services

Food & Beverage – Engineering Services

We offer the following Engineering Services within our Bulk Material Handling Engineering Services :

Discrete Element Modeling (DEM)

Calculation based modeling

Allows for visualizing results

Particle velocity

Forces (shear and normal) and moments (bending and torsional)

Acceleration and material scatter

More than just flow simulation of bulk materials

wear Patterns

Mixing

Center loading

DEM Benefits

Reduced Dust Levels​

Reduced Noise​

Reduced Chute Plugging​

Better Conveyor Tracking (Center Loading)​

Reduced Belt Cover Wear​

Reduced Chute Wear​

Reduced Equipment Wear

Structural Engineering Services

Foundation Design

Concrete Structure Design

Steel Structure Design

Piping Engineering Services

Bulk material handling engineering specifically focuses on the design, processing, and transportation of bulk materials, which can include items such as ores, coal, minerals, and grains, among others. These materials often present unique challenges due to their bulk nature, including issues related to flowability, abrasiveness, corrosiveness, weight, and other specific characteristics. Here are the various aspects of bulk material handling engineering services:

Storage Solutions:

Design and layout of silos, bins, and stockpiles

Assessment of material flow properties to reduce issues like bridging or rat-holing

Conveyor Systems:

Design and optimization of belt, screw, chain, and pneumatic conveyors

Selection of appropriate conveyor belts, idlers, and drives

Loading and Unloading Systems:

Railcar and truck loading/unloading facilities

Ship and barge loading/unloading equipment

Reclaiming Systems:

Design of stacker-reclaimers, bucket wheel reclaimers, and scraper reclaimers

Size Reduction Equipment:

Crushers, grinders, and milling equipment

Sizers and chutes to manage particle sizes

Screening and Sorting:

Vibrating screens, trommels, and sorters

Density separation using jigs or cyclones

Feeding and Metering Equipment:

Feeders for accurate and controlled material flow

Rotary valves, weigh feeders, and volumetric feeders

Material Transfer:

Chutes, hoppers, and gates

Transfer tower and junction house design

Dust Control and Suppression:

Dust collection and filtration systems

Wet suppression and foam suppression systems

Safety and Environmental Considerations:

Explosion and fire protection in dusty environments

Erosion control and spill prevention

Flow Aids and Devices:

Vibrators and air cannons to aid material flow

Flow liners and internal coatings

Bulk Material Testing:

Evaluating flowability, abrasiveness, and other material properties

Moisture content and material density testing

Rail and Marine Infrastructure:

Rail siding design and layout

Port and harbor infrastructure for bulk material export/import

Automation and Controls:

Automated monitoring of material levels in bins and silos

Control systems for conveyor speed, material flow, and routing

Maintenance and Wear Protection:

Wear liners and abrasion-resistant materials

Maintenance strategies and schedules

Bulk Material Transport:

Pipeline transport for slurry and other bulk fluids

Pneumatic transport systems for powders and granules

Economic Analysis:

Cost estimation for bulk material handling projects

Return on investment (ROI) calculations

Regulatory Compliance and Standards:

Ensuring designs meet relevant industry standards

Adherence to safety and environmental regulations

Continuous Improvement and Upgrades:

Evaluation of existing systems for performance enhancement

Retrofitting and upgrading older infrastructure

Consultation and Advisory Services:

Providing expertise on specific bulk material challenges

Assisting with vendor and equipment selection

Given the unique nature and challenges of handling bulk materials, these services are essential to ensure efficient, safe, and economical processing, transportation, and storage. Properly designed and managed systems reduce product loss, minimize environmental impacts, and ensure safety while optimizing costs.

Tags:

Little P.Eng. Engineering

Structural design

Compliance

Mechanical design

Energy efficiency

Single-boom spreaders

Bulk material transfer

Bulk material transport

Client-centric approach

Environmental impact

Material handling

Treatment facilities

Conveyor systems

Infrastructure design

Pneumatic transport

Refining

Material grading

Transfer points

Dust suppression

Material contamination

Bulk material degradation

Silo design

Loading docks

Workflow optimization

Advanced ventilation systems

Risk assessment

Sustainable engineering

Material integrity

Client testimonials

Automation in material handling

Bulk Material Handling & Processing

Engineering Services

Structural Engineering Consultancy

Located in Calgary, Alberta; Vancouver, BC; Toronto, Ontario; Edmonton, Alberta; Houston Texas; Torrance, California; El Segundo, CA; Manhattan Beach, CA; Concord, CA; We offer our engineering consultancy services across Canada and United States. Meena Rezkallah.

[atlurbanist]

Nice post from a Washington state transportation professional!

It's great to have something to brag about in Atlanta when it comes to street redesign that de-centers car flow and lifts up cycling or walking!

The nation is watching, and wants us to succeed. 😊

Next, let's aim for a truly well-connected system of these lovely things in Atlanta.

[atlantathecity]

The Atlanta Beltline is crowded because it's too rare

We went to lunch on the Beltline with some people who were visiting from NYC today.

They told us they were surprised to see fast-moving cyclists sharing the path with pedestrians. And sure enough we did see some conflicts.

I guess I've gotten fairly used to it. I don't really think much about the mix of the two speeds until it's really crowded and someone ends up taking a spill off their bike or scooter.

But I can understand how it may seem like a bit of a mess to the uninitiated.

Mostly, it cements my opinion that the main solution to crowding on the Beltline is to make the surrounding streets safer for walking and cycling, so that this one path doesn't bear such a heavy weight for serving the needs of Atlantans who want to get around without a car.

Someone once said Americans are so starved for walkable urbanism that if you put three nice blocks together it becomes a tourist attraction.

I think a similar thing could be said about the Beltline. We're starved for nice places to walk and bike and skateboard and ride scooters, especially where actual destinations exist -- versus a PATH trail that has few destinations alongside it.

Redesign streets to serve this purpose too.

[fatliberation]

anti-fatness is not just body shaming.

anti-fatness is discrimination. anti-fatness is having next to no legal protections for being discriminated against. anti-fatness is being denied housing, jobs, receiving less pay and promotions (legally) because of your size. anti-fatness is being denied access to clothing, seating, transportation, and other human rights because infrastructure has been designed to exclude you. anti-fatness is less likelihood of receiving a fair trial. anti-fatness is dehumanization. anti-fatness is being denied necessary surgeries, but not surgery that amputates the digestive tract with the intent to starve and shrink you (it doesn’t work either). anti-fatness is mutilation. anti-fatness is being subject to torture devices that bolt your mouth shut. anti-fatness is being told by close friends, family, and professionals that you are better off living with an eating disorder or other life-threatening illness. anti-fatness sells you starvation as a guaranteed opt-out of oppression, but doesn’t tell you that bodies will always regain weight to survive. anti-fatness blames and punishes you for failing at an achievement that is quite literally impossible. anti-fatness is a $90 billion dollar industry. anti-fatness is being denied gender-affirming care. anti-fatness is being barred from in vitro fertilization and reproductive healthcare. anti-fatness is being barred from adopting children. anti-fatness is being removed from your loving parents because they couldn’t make you thin. anti-fatness is intentionally starving your own baby so they won’t get fat. anti-fatness is disproportionately high suicide rates. anti-fatness is being killed at the hands of medical neglect and mistreatment. anti-fatness is the world preferring a dead body over a fat one.

[mysticdragon3md3]

Been interested in Los Angeles Metro trains lately. Expansions are great, but public transportation is kind of useless if a small woman travelling alone like me can't feel safe. I've skipped several events i could've taken buses to, bc route involved 1 block walk after sundown.