Alice Lang
Feels Bad Man, 2017
1K notes
·
View notes
How it feels deleting my 114hr EA saves ahead of the full release TTvTT
460 notes
·
View notes
fictif oc (nashwa) sketches + sage stealing their big dumbass hat
215 notes
·
View notes
This is just... not cool.
Just not cool.
Yep, Max owns the right to use OFMD images for their original programming. No argument there.
But is this kind of - cruel? Yeah, I'd say so.
Logged on to Max today - February 7th, almost a month after the gut punch of cancellation - and THIS greets me:
That's right.
Ed. Our Ed, our Blackbeard, our best friend, our good time boy, our rotten soldier, our sweet cheese. Right smack in the center of my browser window.
Either a web design staffer is just as upset as we are or Max is quietly cashing in on the publicity OFMD is getting. I'm not sure. Either way, feels bad. Just bad.
81 notes
·
View notes
Me killing every adorable creature in the sea for Neuvillette mats
109 notes
·
View notes
I hesitate to post this since the “ToTK is proimperialist” buzz seems to have pretty much died down, but there is another thing about it that’s really been not sitting well with me which I’d like to go ahead and air out:
This scene is often brought up when arguing the idea that Ganondorf did what he did in self defense against an outside force threatening to absorb his people’s lands, but you can only view it that way by taking this scene completely out of context.
The claim is that Rauru forced the Gerudo to bow to him here, to make a show of submission. That this imagery is supposedly evidence that what Rauru (not Sonia, she is always ignored in these talking points it seems, despite being Hyrule’s cofounder and coruler) “really” wanted all along was to subjugate Ganondorf and the rest of the Gerudo.
To that, please question this:
Who is in control, in this scene?
On the surface, Rauru and Sonia. But in reality?
It’s Ganondorf.
This scene is Ganondorf prostrating himself and his underlings in front of his targets in an attempt to lure them into a false sense of security or at the very least use insincere diplomacy to manipulate them into letting him close. He has realized that he is outmatched in terms of physical strength (for now) and has shifted to relying on his cunning to win the long game.
Throughout this entire exchange, Ganondorf subversively dominates this room. The throne room. The very seat of Rauru and Sonia’s power.
Ganondorf found a way to stay on top of things even when he was at a disadvantage by using Rauru and Sonia’s peacefulness against them.
Ganondorf is power incarnate.
He is never the victim, so putting him in that role… just because he’s a person of color? Can we all see the problem with that? Especially since his initial victims are also coded as people of color…
This argument effectively forces a powerful person of color character into a victim box just because he is a poc while simultaneously demonizing another poc coded character (Rauru) and erasing a woman of color (Sonia) from the narrative entirely!
Please consider.
73 notes
·
View notes
watching the social media team be thrown to the wolves bc sso makes another terrible decision part 522574
61 notes
·
View notes
I just had such a sad realization.
Ever since Fig found out Gilear wasn't her biological dad, she's never called him dad, she always just called him by his name-
Like yeah sometimes she calls Sandra Lynn by name, but I can still recall her calling her mom. I cannot for the life of me remember a single moment Fig has said dad when referring to Gilear :(
82 notes
·
View notes
"Hypergryph/AZLing forgot about Absinthe" was a funny joke for awhile but I've recently been informed that Leto has now appeared in more official art then Absinthe has so I think its time I start knocking on Lowlight's door politely demanding answers
55 notes
·
View notes
sorry for not staying in better contact babygirl i was too busy thinking about Nothing
298 notes
·
View notes