#helluva boss discourse

[untitledlurkingproject]

S1 Stolas and the Topic of Coercion

Hello! I'm new to Tumblr and just wanted a space to express some feelings I have about Helluva Boss. I've been seeing a lot of discourse/outright anger about "Stolas coercing Blitz," and I wanted to give my two cents. I want to preface by saying that I am a SA survivor, and an adult. Here's my take, and I invite others to share theirs.

The deal between Stolas and Blitz has coercive overtones due to the structure and inherent power imbalance, but it never materializes into actual coercion. We never see Stolas enforce or weaponize the deal.

Blitz is also shown craving the arrangement (especially evident in Truth Seekers and Full Moon), and Blitz does not wear his true emotions on his sleeves (i.e. We see him glaring at Stolas often, but has a soft look in a picture he took of Stolas, while Stolas was asleep.) Blitz constantly says things he doesn't mean, not only to Stolas, but to M&M (calling their relationship "too wholesome for his taste" and "boring af.") His lack of honesty obviously stems from his fear with intimacy, as stated outright in Truth Seekers. He also demonstrates repeatedly that he feels comfortable saying no to sex (Ozzie’s, and lines from Oops). You can't coerce someone into doing something they already want to do and feel comfortable saying no to.

Stolas may hold institutional and magical power, but emotionally and sexually, he hands that power over to Blitz—allowing Blitz to dictate the pace, the tone, and the boundaries of their interactions. ("If that's what you want to play.") That’s where Blitz’s own intentional manipulation comes into play, followed by unintentional ("he can get hurt?") harm.

So, yes, the deal has coercive elements, but Stolas doesn't coerce Blitz. Stolas fundamentally is not a coercive character, and Stolas's good intentions and lack of good communication are why he does away with the deal. Blitz's anger at Ozzie's makes him concerned that Blitz doesn't even like being around him. Stolas's concern becomes, "I thought he liked me for my money and body (and I hoped for more), but if he doesn't like me, then am I just making him have sex with me? That's not fair." He relates that to the only experiences he has, of being stuck in an abusive, arranged marriage. Though Stolas's concerns about Blitz's consent are extremely valid and SO important, the sex obviously wasn't Blitz's issue. Blitz's issue is the belittling and classist comments that make him feel less than and feeds into his insecurities of not being good enough to be with someone like Stolas. It's very obvious that pre-Ozzie's Stolas is not honest about his feelings, and he uses that language since it is normalized in amongst all classes of hell, not just Ars Goetia. (Millie calls Loona "the hellhound" for most of the show. Blitz calls Verosika a "suck-u-bit) He wears that kind of language as he does his expensive regalia, but when he thinks Blitz is taking the relationship to the next step in Ozzie’s, he drops the act. That's why we never see him use those terms like "impish plaything" in Ozzie's or onward. It's clear that he actually does see Blitz as his equal (bowing, "I don't care if you're of lower station," thinking he'll die for Blitz when they exchange places on the chopping block).

Just because a structure has the potential for coercion doesn’t mean coercion is actually taking place.

Those are just my thoughts, and I wanted to hear yours! Do you think my takes are accurate?

[sweetest-starlight]

“Stolas has depression and that ultimately affects some of his choices and he is not a terrible person or irredeemable because of it” and

“Stolas has neglected Via as a person throughout his time raising her and her actions are ultimately justified because of his repeated instances of breaking his promises” AND

“Stolas is still LEAGUES better than Paimon or Stella in the parenting department” are all opinions that can coexist and should

[cute-little-fly]

Every day I understand more why some people have trouble with watching Helluva.

A lot of details and characterizations are not explicitly shown, but are shown indirectly and you need to rewatch and dig deeper for yourself and catch those details.

I won’t enter into the debate of wether that is good or bad storytelling. Is just a way to do it, for some people work, for some don’t. That’s it.

One recent example: some people was puzzled why Blitzø saw a family with Stolas and Octavia, and they think is Out of character he wants that.

However, with small details they have shown that was Blitz’s driving force since the beginning. But even himself didn’t realized until now that he has opened his heart.

Examples:

If he was trully a cold blooded asshole he wouldn’t have adopted Loona. Never never… he would have adopted a more aggressive and deathly hellhound if he really only was there for the business. Immediately seeing her as his daughter for no reason.

Like, all his façade is just bullshit just bc of that… but I will tell you something else.

When we see his backstory at the circus we see how his life was. A family circus… a family business… having an office for a circus=having his family in better work conditions. He recreated this in his adult life.

Adopting people on the way because he connected with them. Of course, he brought Millie to the team because how amazingly good she is. But don’t you think he also felt a connection with her too? An special one? This is shown while they are fighting. He enjoys fighting with her. Wrath imps culture circules around fights. This is a way they bond. He wanted her there because he felt a connection.

With Moxxie was the same. The exact same thing. He is just there adopting people he feels this connection with to recreate the circus.

Now, the next step for that would be expand that family with his current SO and his daughter; because his wish hasn’t just been having the circus family kind again, he have always wanted a romantic partner too. He has been months regretting having lost Stolas. Months to think about what could have been, about how he is the person he loves and probably could have formed a family with if having the chance.

People are just not willing to think if they are not clearly shown something. Also, is an indie cartoon so they don’t have much time to show things and they need to progress the story.

But essentially the problem people have with HB is that one.

They have a problem with Millie because she is not directly shown having things outside the main cast because she isn’t usually focused. Her backstory episode was also an important Blitzø episode, so they think is as simple as saying: all her development revolves around men. As if Blitz’s development didn’t revolved around the people he cares.

They don’t think is important to her character that she is the one keeping them together in hard times. They don’t think this relates to how sometimes she doesn’t feel seen. She is the best in assassin but still… she doesn’t feel seen.

She was a regular assassins when she met Blitzø. She wasn’t one considered special or anything. Blitzø was the one who saw that potential and saw HER!

This is why he is her bestie.

[criticalcrusherbot]

Crushbot: This feels less like a good-faith critique and more like someone searching for a reason to hate Vivziepop and her work. The parallels between Helluva Boss and Bojack Horseman are there, sure—but reducing Stolas’s arc to a “can I copy your homework?” moment reeks of a desperate attempt to discredit the show rather than actually engaging with what it’s doing.

Parallels, Sure—But Context Matters

Let’s talk about the alleged similarities. Yes, Stolas being hated by the imps after his banishment could look like Bojack being “cancelled.” Both happen after courtroom scenes. Both involve estrangement from a younger female family member (Octavia for Stolas, Hollyhock for Bojack). That’s where the similarities end, and pretending otherwise ignores the wildly different purposes these arcs serve.

Bojack vs. Stolas

Bojack’s arc is about personal accountability and the destruction he leaves in his wake. His estrangement from Hollyhock is well-earned; she discovers the ways he’s manipulated and harmed others, and she rightfully cuts him off. The public backlash against Bojack is a direct response to his moral failings, forcing him to sit with the consequences of his actions.

Stolas, on the other hand, is being punished specifically for lending Blitz his grimoire, an illegal act that threatens the power structures of Hell. The characters in power (the Sins and the Goetia) care far more about this rule-breaking and his vague proclamation of being the "mastermind" behind some heinous plot than about his personal failings—cheating on Stella or neglecting Octavia emotionally. And they certainly don’t care about his classism or his (unintentionally) demeaning attitude towards imps.

Stolas’s punishment in Mastermind reflects Hell’s oppressive hierarchy and its misplaced priorities, rather than serving as a reckoning with his true faults. Comparing these two situations as if they’re identical flattens both narratives, ignoring the distinct ways each show explores power, accountability, and personal flaws.

The Martyr Argument

The claim that Stolas is treated like a martyr and excused for his actions is laughable. Stolas is flawed; the show never pretends otherwise. We’ve seen him struggle with his poor decisions and their consequences—particularly with Octavia. But his punishment in Mastermind isn’t about absolving him; it’s about highlighting the misdirected anger of an oppressive system.

This misdirected anger mirrors the real-world reactions of oppressed groups, who often lash out at convenient but less culpable targets when they feel powerless to confront the true source of their suffering. The hatred Stolas faces from the imp community doesn’t stem from his personal failings—it stems from the deep, systemic inequities of Hell's hierarchy, a system Stolas has long benefited from. 

The idea that Vivziepop thinks Stolas is “blameless” feels like an intentional misreading. Stolas is far from perfect, but his arc is about redemption and growth, not victimhood. If anything, the animosity he faces underscores the show’s broader themes of power dynamics and societal injustice, emphasizing how oppressive systems perpetuate cycles of blame and resentment.

“Can I Copy Your Homework?”—Lazy Critique

Sure, you can find surface-level similarities between Helluva Boss and Bojack Horseman, but that doesn’t make one a copy of the other. The thematic goals are wildly different:

Bojack Horseman is a deeply introspective, human story about accountability and the lasting damage of selfishness.

Helluva Boss is a surreal, melodramatic exploration of power, marginalization, and complicated relationships within a hellish hierarchy.

If anything, the similarities between the two are evidence of Helluva Boss drawing from familiar storytelling beats to craft something uniquely its own. Accusing it of plagiarism or lazy writing misses the point entirely. Stolas’s arc is tailored to Helluva Boss’s world—a chaotic, exaggerated, and deeply emotional sandbox that doesn’t care about “grounded realism” in the same way Bojack Horseman does.

The Real Issue

Let’s be honest: critiques like this aren’t really about writing quality or thematic depth. They’re about taking perverse joy in tearing Vivziepop down. It’s less about legitimate criticism and more about manufacturing outrage. It’s exhausting.

The truth is, Helluva Boss does what it sets out to do: deliver a visually stunning, emotionally resonant, and often absurd story in a way that resonates with its audience. If some people are so hung up on surface-level comparisons that they can’t see that, maybe they’re not the intended audience—and that’s fine. But let’s not pretend their bad-faith critiques hold any weight.

[eepy-eep]

I don't interact with the Helluva Boss fandom much but I wanted to give my two cents on that animation that has been going around. You know the one. (If you don't, it's a short animated amv style video of Stolas and Blitzo that ends with Stolas shooting himself in the head.)

I don't think the issue is of the animation itself. Gore and visually presented gore are common place in the source material and that's to be expected. The gore from the show is contextualized through the actions of the characters and we often expect it to happen and what may happen based on the scenarios at hand. Even given that, each episode provides warnings and more clear idea of what is going to be presented.

However, the animation of Stolas provides no warning or hint that the video would end the way it did. There are no prior things to contextualize until in the animation, the gun is already kissing his chin. It's shocking and unexpected. I think because of that fact, the creator could have at least specified the type of gore that would've been present in the video. When there's no warning as to what we're about to see and when the media does not contextualize what we're about to see, I argue that a plain warning of "gore" is insufficient.

It's the reason why shows on streaming services will specify what happens. If an episode says it'll have suicide, you can expect suicide, even if it happens suddenly and without warning in the source material. Giving a more specific warning for media that provides shocking content seems like a common courtesy. "Gore" could mean a lot of things, and some people may be able to handle some types of it but not others. Does that mean people shouldn't be able to enjoy media that has it because of specific triggers? No, because specifications provide safety. They're important if you're going to tag something or give it warnings to begin with.

I don't think that it helps at all that the animation is poorly blurred and realistic, nor that some of the more popular traumatic shock videos that circulate online periodically are of gun related suicides. I know when I saw that animation, it triggered me personally because of my experiences both online and in real life from gun related deaths. (Seeing uncensored gore, having multiple friends and family members who've committed via a firearm.) If I'd seen on the video or description or anywhere that the video was going to contain both suicide and gun violence I wouldn't have watched it because I would've inferred what would've happened. It would have saved me some unnecessary triggering thoughts and feelings.

Whether or not things should include trigger warnings and the specific nature of the warnings is a whole argument in of itself, but I don't think we should be bashing or shaming those who find displeasure in what they saw. I also don't think we should be canceling the artist for animating that. I think we should be having open narratives and discussions on the nature of triggering content and how we can do our due diligence in ensuring a fandom space can be welcoming to those with triggers while containing mature themes and subjects, whether they're presented visually or not.

Edit: I should note that when I watched the video on YouTube, there was not any specific warning in place by the platform itself. I've been told that apparently there is a warning for suicide related topics and while it's an improvement, I do think the issue of reposted videos and people sharing the content makes this post stand true in regards to media and its content.

[theadhddimsenion]

A time for me to vent.

I find it fascinating just how much and how Many people their are who are determined to slander, insult and otherwise shit on vivi and her work. Like ok if it was just a few people making a fuss then yeah ok every piece of media has it's fair share of critics but every time I try and open up YouTube I am met with dozens upon dozens of videos endlessly regurgitating the same empty and bland criticisms about vivis work and calling her a bad person and I'm like 'huh?'

At first I though she had genuinely done something wrong but no she was really wanted to keep her passion project alive and needed to shift money around and people where getting unreasonably upset at her for it.

And every year I just saw more and more videos declaring that vivi was an awful person and a racist and a sexist and basically every bad thing under the sun!! And it got me thinking what on earth could possibly inspire so much hate towards someone whose greatest flaw is being a bit sensitive and not always the best at exploring her ideas and have people creating entire communities dedicated to bashing her!?!?!

I think that the part of the issue is that vivi is what every young artist wanted to be. Able to have an entire animation studio of her own and having a whole team dedicated to bringing her silly little demon ocs to life. And that's another thing!

[ghost-oftheriver]

alr i’ve had this simmering inside me for a while and i need to let it out.

hot take here, but stella’s haters are wayy worse than her fans. like… what moral high ground are you trying to stand on here. it’s fiction.

look i don’t even like stella. she sucks, and personally i want to know WHY she sucks, and the last post i made about her, i got multiple keyboard warriors in my comments yelling, it doesn’t need justification! she can just suck! for once we don’t have to think about why we hate a character! wanting depth for stella is pointless, she can never be redeemed! we have enough stella sympathizers! stop acting like her treatment of stolas is anything other than abuse! this can’t be solved with a tragic backstory!

since when does knowing someone’s reasons for being the way they are automatically make them less shitty? if they continue to do bad things, then their past doesn’t justify them. but that doesn’t fucking mean that we as viewers can’t be curious about it. contemplating and discussing that shit is just part of the fun for a lot of fans.

and when i got those comments, i was. baffled. because that is so incredibly mild. if that’s bad, then i dread to think of how people treat anyone who actually likes her. because GODDAMN do people act like that is a sin worse than actually committing those acts against a real human in real life.

does vivziepop have to add another line to the warning in the beginning of every episode?

“the following cartoon contains graphic violence, strong language, sexual themes, flashing lights, as well as rampant demon horniness. nobody was hurt in the making of this show, because all characters are fictional, meaning they are not real. they cannot be hurt because they are not real. you should not attack real people over the actions of fictional people. so yes, it’s intended for mature audiences.”

i need you to read this part very carefully. it’s fine if you prefer simple antagonists. it’s fine that you want her to be easy to hate. i am not saying there’s anything wrong with that. if that’s what you’re hoping for, great! that’s literally okay. it’s not what i personally prefer but that is not the point of this post.

i’m saying that tossing around words like “sympathizing with abusers” about fans who are literally talking about a collection of pixels on a screen… is fucked up. prioritizing the well-beings of stolas and octavia over those of your fellow hellaverse fans is abhorrent behavior. because.. once again… unlike your fellow fans, stolas and octavia are not real. that is an extreme overreaction and it is HARMING real people. stop that. for the love of god.

[helluvahusker]

Gotta be real, I do not understand why people are wasting their time arguing over who Vassago is going to be to Stolas and why whatever they think will be good/bad. Like babygirls. None of us know. We won't know until the episodes are released. Maybe wait to argue with strangers over Vassago until we have him canonically? Idk. Maybe that's just me.

[fizzyrodeo]

"blitzø is the worst character-!"

"no, it's obviously stolas!! nobody should like stolas-!!"

me, in the corner, holding back a four-hour rant about loona;

(and i'm not attacking the voice actor for things she's went through, because for some reason whenever someone criticises loona there's always one person who goes 'the voice actor was having a rough time so that's why loona was off'. i am not criticizing how loona didn't have any lines for an entire episode or how she was out of the picture for a little bit. i'm talking about how she's a pos to moxxie— who's only crime that i can recall is calling her out for her bs and blitzø for enabling her— and blitzø, which is wild when she's probably the one person in the cast that blitzø has put his best self forth for, 100% of the time. the only remotely sound argument i can think of is 'loona missed out on childhood due to being homeless which is why she's acting so immature and crude now that she's adopted' but that doesn't change the fact that she treats the one person who deeply cares for her like he's garbage- UNLESS he's not in a coherent state.)

[smolomega-9]

Say what you want about viv’s shows being bad (there’s a lot to say) but one thing I’m not mad about is basing the Wrath ring on the Deep South.

That shit was funny as hell and as a southern girl fine lmao I’ll take the representation 😭👌

[moved-to-civic-hub]

@cxffeeshxp asked:

🔥

I know that the Hellaverse has a lot of flaws but the amount of hate it gets is ridiculous. There will be drama over everything. Hazbin Hotel merch being sold at Hot Topic? People wearing Hellaverse merch in public? The Hazbin Hotel twitter/X account posting a picture of Fat Nuggets? Drama.

I understand that people might not like Viv or the Hellaverse but jfc.

unpopular opinions // open & accepting

[cute-little-fly]

I find funny that you know you are a starting to be a veteran in this fandom when you have seen more than one iteration of the same arguments and discussions about Stolitz.

You start caring each time less about it but also, in great part, because how tired and annoyed you are of having the exact same discussions over and over. We could be having so many interesting analysis and discussions about it. But they are circling over and over the same things.

At some point they should know when to stop, they won’t make us dislike the show and they will just keep agreeing with other haters. Of course, I know they won’t stop. After years of cycling the same things it’s more clear than water.

They are just angry that the show they despise and dislike that hard is popular. I think this is it. They think we should not like it and that is so entitled… Why you dare tell people what to like and what not?

I can even stand people thinking: I don’t get how can they like it. Because well, okay, you have a different mindset and for you is hard to understand the appeal and that’s it. I’m okay with that. But the moment they think this should not be successful is when I put a STOP.

I think that at the beginning people didn’t had much issue with Hazbin because it was less popular. People can stand these things if they don’t get mass appeal.

Video games like Undertale suffered the same phenomenon. People were okay with it when it wasn’t popular, but when a lot of people like it and ends up being popular they say: okay this is nice and all, but this video game doesn’t deserve much praising and popularity because it is technically so bad and the programming is trash etc etc… and like, most players don’t gaf about those things because we aren’t game critics or game experts. We liked the characters, the experience and we got emotional about it and other similar games don’t offer what this offers. That’s it.

I feel the same about the hellaverse. Even with all its flaws, I have been captivated by these world and characters. This offers what other adult animated shows don’t (if you count only those made in North America, because I would say anime and manga has a lot of different stuff). That’s it.

I can think in some many movies that aren’t really that good plot wise but are beloved classics for what they represent for a group of people or a generation. We… sometimes are like that, and I find funny that a lot of the people that complain about the hellaverse is not like they enjoy high artistic quality or super niche series or movies.

They also watch other similar stuff that is silly too, or doesn’t have this immense writing or artistic depth, and just because is more edgy or dark themed they don’t see an issue with that existing. But the hellaverse existing and being liked? A crime just because it dares to have some gray morality around the plot and characters.

They wouldn’t survive real controversial niche movies and cinema. They are worse sometimes in all of what they complain about the hellaverse.

As long as the Hellaverse is popular and get good things they will be mad… and that is so annoying if you just want to chill and enjoy it in peace as how the show was created and intended.

[baobhanlore-art]

After watching Unhappy Campers, I think I know what my biggest issue with Helluva Boss Season 2 is and that the jokes ruining tension and lowering the stakes.

In E2: Seeing Stars, the whole joke plotline of Blitz and Stolas in the sitcom made the search for Octavia feel insignificant and made Stolas look like a bad parent for fooling around there. If they'd just split up from Loona and had antics to do with their complicated relationships and their daughters, while Loona eventually found her, with the comedy largely coming from Moxxie and Millie, I feel like that would have been better. Maybe even if after the balcony scene, we extend it and have Blitz and Stolas meet them after Loona and Octavia's conversation. But we didn't.

In E3: Exes and Oohs, we see this happen twice. Once when Moxxie leaves the room and the dildos are all out, which cheapens the traumatic experience that was seeing his Dad, and then when we find out Chaz isn't rich. The last one cheapens the stakes by meaning the conflict now could mostly be resolved with Blitz yelling "Chaz isn't rich!" and then being granted the chance to explain himself. But the joke element ended up ruining the tension and we got a fight scene with Millie that looked phenomenal but would have been better if there were higher stakes.

In E4: Western Energy, Andrealphus's existence and his interactions with Stella that cause them to recall the assassination make the fight against Striker feel cheap and frustrating. They got to a point where they thought they were saving his life but we're actually saving him a few more days in the hospital. It lessened the stakes and tension unnecessarily.

And finally in E5: Unhappy Campers, Millie finds out who the killer is really fast making the whole ordeal unnecessary and annoying. It still would have been funny if we say how Moxxie was going overboard with the ruse without the mystery being solved, and the actions would have felt like they had more purpose, but it limited the stakes and tension.

It honestly feels like insecurity. Like the team are afraid to fully commit to the plotlines they write because instantaneous jokes and a focus on drama would cause people to click away. But we as fans want to see the stakes and drama! I just hate to see dumb jokes prioritised over the aspects of the show so many people loved.

Because regardless if you think the plot decisions are good or not, the interpersonal drama is probably the strongest aspect of the show's writing.

[amr2002amr]

People who say it is stupid to cry while watching Helluva Boss or Hazbin Hotel because the writing, etc. is cringe clearly are missing the emotional point of the shows. It is okay to cry at them because damn the shows are about some pretty emotional stuff a lot of the time. Not everyone will cry at the shows but it is not okay to shame people for crying at it just cause you say "it is cringe." Smh

Ykkk

[theadhddimsenion]

Something I have started to wonder about the "anti" and "critical" crowd.

What? If anything did you people believe you are going to accomplish by endlessly going on about how bad both Vivienne and her work are?

I mean you people have put so many works criticizing her work but according to you she hasn't listened to any of you so why keep trying?

Do you actually believe that your "criticisms" are legitimate and that you will be the ones who will "save" both series?

I would think that if you really think it's that bad the I would have thought that you all would have just given up on the series and stopped trying.

Do you think that vivi really is a monster that must be brought down? That she's a sexist, racist, a demon for lack of a word? If so why? Because she had some vague aspects of her charaters that are stereotypical? Because she didn't put enough focus on the female cast for you liking? Because she made a couple of tasteless jokes?

Look I genuinely don't want to start a fight here, but it just Don't see the point of what you all are doing. Why does vivi and her work make you so upset? Do even believe the things you say or do you just do it because it gets you attention? Ether way I could try and understand.

*sigh* look if it makes you all feel better I don't believe either show is flawless, it has some tonal issues, some moments don't get proper build up, not all of the jokes land, some cast members do tend to hog the spotlight but my main question is if I can look past that and see something good why can't you?

[fizzyrodeo]

Updated Helluva Boss Tierlist (S1-S2)

Since quite a lot has happened with the characters since my first tierlist, I've decided to remake it! The old one is the third shown, for reference. The tiers are slightly different, and I'll also be explaining some of my choices below the cut!

(^^ includes my personal fanon ranking)

(^^ excludes my personal fanon ranking)

(^^ original tierlist)

'Superior in my Fanon'

> i feel like i don't need to say that in my version of hb the dynamics between I.M.P. would be very different. still found family, just a better depiction of it.

> best way to fix Mayberry is to NOT have her end up with the woman she tried to kill both in real life AND after death imo. or at the least, flesh her personality out some more before doing so.

> in my version of hb Paimon isn't different in terms of personality. he's just around more in the current timeline and has more definitive interactions with Stolas.

> i don't remember the name of the guy from the blitzø hate party episode, but while he serves as a good show of stolas' flaws and weaknesses, i'd have preferred if he stood as more of a positive comparison to blitzø, highlighting the latter's flaws. this would include a little more screen time and a show of what exactly led to im and stolas dancing and kissing.

'Win(ners)'

> I do NOT support Crimson's actions. However, he is one of the few solid villains we have left in Helluva Boss (and also I have a thing for villains).

> a lot of people take issue with Sallie Mae for reasons to her gender and how it's portrayed in merch + 'not portrayed sufficiently' in the show but I can't think of a single thing that's wrong with her and how she's written.

'Love'

> y'all are hating on Envy for NOTHING 😭😭😭 i mean hating the design is valid but why are we surprised that it isn't accurate to the sources viv based it on?? this isn't new? and at least Envy isn't an eyesore like some others... but i'm maybe people want more of that?? idk, i feel like they're overhated. i love their design, that's about the only reason they're ranked so high.

'Like'

> yes, i do like Stolas!! he's done a lot of things i don't like but it's part of his development. plus, realizing that he actually gets a lot of lasting consequences in canon (regardless of whether he ignores them or not) made me ease up on him. plus he's a crybaby twink. how could i not like a crybaby twink.

> a lot of the characters in this category are either here for their design or their defining moment. Chaz is a bit of a special case, and so is the hellhound adoption center lady. we're sleeping on Barbie Wire's rehab nurse, she did her job GOOD.

'Idrc'

> not much to say here. every character listed in this tier has failed to captivate my interest and for that, i simply don't think of them. a big point i thought of was "who are they without their defining drama?" and for most of them the answer was "little to nothing".

> there's a few random side characters in this tier. they are only present becuse they're side characters that i figured people would remember, and i wanted to state my opinion on them.

'I don't like them'

> all these characters are here because i either dislike the limited appearance they had, dislike their personality, or have extenuating beef.

> there's so much i dislike about Asmodeus- pretty much the same things i dislike about Beelzebub, but i decided to spare him from the very bottom of the list because he is one of the more actively kinder characters in the show.