Tumgik
#idk what dani’s tags r help
ovytia-art · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
For @green-with-envy-phandom-event, line art by @thepokeone
Did I do a whole background so I could do a funny? Yeah. What about it?
Jeff Jefferson created by @englandamericaitaly
70 notes · View notes
chososdiscordkitten · 2 months
Text
⋆˚。⋆୨ About Me ୧⋆˚。⋆
Tumblr media
Fun Facts:
I use they/them pronouns!!
I'm hispanic!! I used to have it in my welcoming page but I just noticed it isnt anymore!!
I'm a libra!!
I'm on the chunkier side, fuller figured, plus size- whatever :)
I only bought a laptop to start writing fanfics. (a very expensive investment but 100% worth it)
my favorite movies are, American Psycho, Gone Girl, Someone Great, nd DeadPool :D
I'm asexual!!! (but u write smut?) yes I do! I just find lines on paper attractive rather than irl people.
Questions:
How long have you been writing? Officially, since last years horny thanksgiving around 2 am. I just couldn't stand how full my brain felt and had to write it and post. But technically, I've been writing fics in my brain for years. Like, I have an actual archive in my brain of all the fics i've mentally written since I was 9. I still remember them all. Yet I can't remember what I ate yesterday, funny huh. A handful of physical ones for my friends (I found writing on my phone so fucking annoying ໒꒰ ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ ꒱১
Why don't you follow back/turn on dms? (/≧ω\) embarrassing but wtv, I'm a very nervous person when it comes to 1 on 1 conversation..? idk if I come off that way in my posts, but I've had my fair share of online friendships/ irl friendships that ended... not great. so instead of doing that again, I'd rather protect my peace and not even try. I luv talking to people through posts nd asks though!! I just get vv anxious and scared (?) when I have to talk to new people in private. I wish I could speak to people on 1 on 1, but it just gives me unnecessary anxiety that makes me want to throw up.
Why tag your stuff with 'chubby reader' if it mentions nothing physically other than r! privates? So people who are on the chunkier side, (like I am) know I wrote a piece with their body in mind. Always, always I will write my stuff with a fuller figured body in mind (˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶)
Will you ever do a face reveal? No probably not. I'd much rather be a faceless entity on here than an actual person. I use spectacles, if that helps picture me better lol
Why the name 'Ten'? I spent the first 3 months on this app as a nameless person, I debated using my irl nickname, and realized my irls could find me just on that. But then I heard 'Ten - Dani Flow' and I loved it soooo much. In Spanish 'ten' means 'here' which I think is vv funny, since I come on here nd im just like 'here, take it.' when I post fics. Plus, it's also 3 letters like my irl nickname (⁀ ᗢ ⁀)
Why is that pic the banner of your pinned post? I remember when I made my pinned, I knew there had to be like- a pic on top. but there wasn't any that called out to me that were 'aesthetic' -so I chose that picture because, growing up I always wanted to run a semi successful fanfic blog. thus 'I used to dream about times like these' its a lil funny thing that makes me laugh every time I see it, cause it doesn't match with the theme of my blog lol
18 notes · View notes
jonsameta · 5 years
Text
Hi, me again!
jesuiscommejesuis: Haha, I’m on that GoT grind and probably won’t stop until the premiere 😂. I trust your opinion so unfortunately you have to endure another ask from me. Anyway…I think that most of us have considered the possibility of Jonsa not being canon. (RIP me if that happens). But my question isn’t about whether Jonsa will be or won’t be (I’ve come to terms with the fact that GoT will end how GRRM always intended it to end) it’s about what that possibility means for all of the evidence, clues, foreshadowing, etc that we’ve gathered. In your opinion will Jonsa not happening render those clues and meta meaningless and we were all crazy after all? Or do they take on a new meaning and point us in a new direction? Idk if that even makes sense. Maybe I’m just afraid that Jonsa wont happen and I’m afraid for no other reason other than that I will have looked and sounded insane to all of my GoT friends and had nothing to show for it. Also do you know of any interviews or blog posts from GRRM possibly supporting Jonsa? Same for D&D? Or any other people on or working with the show? Thank you so much!! 💙
—-
Hi there, 
The thing about theories is they’re like Shrodinger’s cat. If you try to be objective, you have to entertain the possibility that it won’t happen, but it can’t completely be false until proven otherwise. That said, some theories are more probable than others because there’s material within the text that thematically undoes something. This is because a story’s themes (which differs depending on the adaptation but it can’t be completely divorced from the original source either) define its boundaries because they essentially make up “the heart of the story”, not the plot. They give the main characters a moral dilemma that drives their journeys. Considering the themes of the story - both bookwise and showwise - Jonsa is very probable because it answers a lot of long standing character arcs that go beyond these characters and provides a bookend that Jon/Dany cannot considering R+L=J. 
I think anything in this story has to be considered according to the politics - even the fantasy part because the personal is political. With such a spread out story only the themes and the morality dilemmas of politics that the smallest moment can have is what holds it all together. And I think the strongest argument for the probability of Jonsa comes from a structural level of gauging the politics. 
Jon’s parentage is a political game changer and the way it’s been built up it cannot just be for personal angst - especially when the element of his parentage revealing him to have a higher claim than Dany is brought up. It doesn’t just affect him or his relationship with Dany. It affects Westeros and Dany’s own longstanding goal.
Jon may not want to be king, but Dany is walking in as a very unpopular figure into the North and the way she has gone about her campaign hasn’t improved her reputation and only worsened it. And Jon himself will lose popularity after having 1) bent the knee to a Targaryen, 2) consorting with a Targaryen and 3) being a secret Targaryen. 
Dany doesn’t realise that although Jon claims to have pledged his allegiance to her, it doesn’t mean the North has fallen into her hands. He’s only lost their faith from this move so no Targaryen by themselves could claim the North. Not to mention the Vale and Riverlands are more allied to Sansa than they are to Jon. To regain faith, he’d have to separate himself from Dany and the Targaryen identity a bit and yet he would need a political statement that only a marriage alliance to Stark could give if he were to remain in power. There’s also the pesky issue of how unknowingly Sansa and the Starks have more allies than Dany (or Jon without the Starks) does as everyone comes into Winterfell. So Sansa’s constant label as “key to the North” and the importance of marriage alliances becomes very important here. He can’t become king or even gain the faith of the people (back) without Sansa. So in that case, the whole notion of the Pact of Ice and Fire being fulfilled through Dany and Jon falls apart because Jon will be seen as an outsider. @thelawyerthatwaspromised has even written a post with infographics to make it easier to understand. It’s like R+L=J resets the chessboard. Ironically, what the audience thought Jon/Dany’s union would do politically is far more possible through Jon/Sansa. 
As it makes sense as a political match, the possibility of it happening and impacting the narrative increases a lot more. The original outline also matters here because clearly the pseudo-incest tag didn’t stop the author. However, as the characters haven’t interacted in real time in the books and aren’t close, there’s not much people have asked him about it nor has GRRM has said about it unless you count his vague reply once (”I won’t say more than I’ve already said in the books”). I’d say there’s more to be gauged from what he has to say about other ships that fandom roots for, that isn’t as positive as they make it out to be - whether Jon/rya, San/San, San/rion or Jon/Dany. It’s not obvious because he hardly shuts down possibilities but there’s reading between the lines. It becomes more obvious through a process of elimination. It’s also because Jon/Sansa as a ship tramples over so many ships that fandoms have banked on that people are inclined to dismiss it rather than re-evaluate the pre-existing ships. 
On the show, people have been coy too but there’s more content to gauge as the characters have already reunited and their dynamic has become pretty pivotal to the story. Where D&D shut down Dany and Yara ever happening, in the same panel they evaded a question about Jon and Sansa being developed as a romantic relationship. Aiden Gil/lian commented on how Jon’s parentage opens up possibilities for Jon and Sansa’s relationship romantically at the end of season 6. Sophie was asked about it post season 6 and she said it was possible because it’s GOT and they’re cousins. Also, there’s Liam Cunnin/gham who once liked a Jonsa fanvideo lol and he barely has any likes. Sophie has said it’s possible, even as she joked about how it would be embarrassing to film an intimate scene. Kit has somehow avoided all questioning, but he has some pretty interesting reactions regarding Jon and Sansa’s relationship - either in the words he chooses (”She twists him like no one else”) or how over the top his reaction to Sansa is when he talks about how annoying she is to the point where he’s flushed and red and laughing while saying “I’ve gotten really animated now that Sansa has come into the story”. Bryan Cogman has a lot to say regarding this dynamic too, that he even wrote Jon leaving Ghost behind to watch over Sansa when he left for Dragonstone. 
What helps regarding the show is that it’s not just the actors or the political sense, but the camerawork and visual framing that makes their scenes very confusing because they’re shot as a romantic couple about to happen, as @trinuviel has explored in her series “All is Subtext”.  This notion that it was “framed” or “shot” that way was echoed by multiple reviewers and podcasts through season 6 and even into the beginning of season 7. 
A huge part of this was because it very subtly visually paralleled more positive romantic ships on the show like Ned/Cat, Jaime/Brienne, Robb/Talisa, Sam/Gilly, Missandei/Greyworm and even Jon/Ygritte to some extent. This is over a course of 7 episodes under 5 different directors. One of the most telling scenes for me was when they did two back to back parallels to Ned/Cat and Jaime/Brienne after Jon chokeholds Littlefinger over Sansa and they go on to give a Jaime/Brienne-esque goodbye. The same director Mark Mylod directed both the season 6 Jaime/Brienne and season 7 Jon/Sansa goodbye. Bryan Cogman even confirmed that the Littlefinger chokehold was meant to parallel Ned doing the same over Cat. 
But in my opinion, what weirdly cemented it was how Jon/Dany contrasted Jon/Sansa’s dynamic and framing. There were a lot of structural decisions made that undercut the Jon/Dany “romance” and made Jon/Sansa look more compatible and romantic, which is something I explored in my “Undoing Romance” series. Again, this is looking beyond the actors. The biggest tell for me was that they never got a first kiss so romantic tension was never released but just dissipated over plot exposition. Moreover, how is it that Jon and Sansa have more parallels with romantic ships than Jon/Dany do? Why do Jon/Sansa have more Robb/Talisa framing through season 6 than Jon/Dany through season 7 if that’s what’s happening? Why was there no passionate first kiss like theirs? We just skipped to the sex in between a montage that told us how related they are. 
Why didn’t Jon look back at Dany when Jorah did, while he looked back at Sansa? Why does Jon react more violently to Sansa’s suitors than to Jorah? Why are these characters caught in triangle with interlopers, who pose a political threat but are also interested in one romantically? Why is this dynamic given so much importance where there’s tension but also there’s emotional vulnerability that pours out contrasting Jon/Sansa’s and Sansa and Arya’s season 6 and season 7 battlements scenes respectively. Why did they reveal R+L=J at the end of season 6 - the season in which people questioned what the hell was happening in the Jon/Sansa dynamic and a whole season before Jon met Dany. Both season finales also teased conflict because of political claims that change because of R+L=J. Where his parentage reveal, relieves Jon/Sansa of the direct incest factor because it biologically distances them, it makes Jon and Dany biologically more related - especially because she’s heavily inbred herself. 
So it is a situation of “will they/won’t they?” but even more subtly because the cast and crew always skips past discussing it and with Jon/Dany happening people take it as accidental chemistry. There’s no heavy dismissal from the TPTB though when there could’ve been or laughing at it like Tormund and Brienne, which is totally for laughs and a show ship. What they do keep saying is that this relationship is key to watch and you have to wonder: why is it so important? To me it’s not about the actors chemistry or singular scenes. It’s about the story’s intrinsic narrative structure and the camera framing that makes the visual subtext convey more than the text does. 
The show frames Jon and Sansa’s relationship is odd because we know they weren’t close and Arya was his favorite and yet they take up quite an important part in each other’s arc at this point, where they both want to trust each other completely but don’t and yet their vulnerability comes out most around each other in these last two seasons. They’re being built up more slowly than Jon/Dany and more subtly so while people expect a full blown romance, I expect something more subtle, more quiet and thus emotionally rewarding for these characters individual and collective arcs. If it happens, D&D are building it up as a plot twist/game changer because it’s related to politics. But it’s not to say there can’t be emotional catharsis too because these characters have a lot of issues that they answer pretty well. 
Hope that answers your questions. 
- lostlittlesatellites
73 notes · View notes
Note
Hey this might be an odd question to ask, but what would be the main conflicts in the series if for example Robert had a trueborn son? Cause from what I recognise at the beginning the conflict was set into place by Joffrey (incest born). Stannis and Tensy rebelled cause Joffrey isn’t Baratheon and Robb rebelled cause Joffrey was an ass. I know from my brief knowledge that there’s Daenerys and the Walkers for conflict, but what else would be there? Sorry if this is a long and weird question.
The major initial conflict would still be the mystery of the murder of Jon Arryn. While in the original timeline Jon intended to foster his son Robert (Sweetrobin) at Dragonstone to keep him safe from the coming war once he revealed the incest, he also planned to do it to get him away from Lysa, who he believed was coddling the boy and making him weak. That part wouldn’t change in this AU, so Lysa will still freak out about her baby being taken away from her, will still go to Littlefinger for help, and he’ll still provide her the Tears of Lys poison to kill Jon. Littlefinger’s motivations – to cause chaos and a war between the great houses that he can take advantage of to rise to the top – also won’t have changed, so he’d be urging that war along whether or not Joffrey is actually legitimate. Varys would also do his best to manage the conflict, for his secret Targaryen restoration plot. Oh, and Littlefinger’s fraud leading to the crown’s great debt, that wouldn’t change at all.
Another major conflict (and part of LF and Varys’s schemes) would be the influence of House Lannister on King Robert – which would include Robert and Cersei’s hate for each other, and Stannis and Renly’s distaste for it all. Even with a legitimate Joffrey, there would still be tons of Lannister appointees in the capital (including two of Robert’s squires), the crown would still owe Tywin three million dragons, and so on. Just because Cersei was not Cersei and had Robert’s child doesn’t mean she still won’t be sleeping around with Jaime. Robert would still be a cheater, which would make Cersei cold to him (even if she didn’t have her Jaime thing), and Robert nasty to her in response, resenting the Lannister influence on the crown that’s somehow taken over his life. (Because he’s too weak and lazy to do otherwise, and because Jon Arryn thought it was politically advantageous I guess.) Renly would still be interested in the Tyrells as a powerful and wealthy house to counter the Lannisters (and because it’s his boyfriend’s family and so on), and might still probably bring in Margaery in hopes Robert’s love for her would be enough to get him to get rid of Cersei even without an incest/treason thing to have her executed. Stannis would probably just be grinding his teeth about it all, idk, he doesn’t have the same motivations here… but maybe after Jon Arryn is killed he goes home to Dragonstone and the Melisandre plot kicks in, though I can’t quite figure out how without the “one true king” thing and without his need for a “red hawk”. More religious conflict and less military? hmm.
Plus, even if Jon Arryn’s murder happens at a different point in time, it still happens and Robert still goes to Winterfell to make Ned his new Hand… and Jaime and Cersei still sneak off to fuck and talk about the various threats and plots, and Bran still sees them, and almost certainly still gets pushed out the window. Maybe if it happens some years later and Bran’s a little older he’d be more aware of what was happening and what was being discussed, and find a way not to be noticed and sneak off… but I doubt there’d be that much change, and so we have Bran’s attempted murder in addition to Jon Arryn’s murder, bringing the Starks into the conflict. Littlefinger would still have Lysa write the coded message blaming the Lannisters for Jon’s death, also, so that wouldn’t change in the slightest. Whether Ned would still discover the incest is questionable – since without Jon Arryn’s initial research, and without Sansa’s declaration that Joffrey was nothing like Robert that led him to make the conclusion in OTL, he probably wouldn’t get there on his own – but somebody’s likely to give the game away to him to spark the war, Littlefinger most likely but Varys is a possibility too. Mind you, with the heir to the throne being actually legitimate, Ned might not change Robert’s will – but Cersei probably will still have Robert killed at some point, and would probably arrest Ned on trumped-up charges just to make sure he isn’t in her way. Ned’s arrest gets the Starks on the march no matter what… though possibly he’s not killed if this Robert’s son Joffrey isn’t as subject to influence by Littlefinger as the main timeline’s. Nevertheless, war’s happening somehow, it’s certain, there’s just too much tension and too many people who want war to happen for it to go otherwise.
And yeah, of course we have the ice-and-fire plot in addition to the game-of-thrones plot, Dany and Aegon and Jon/R+L=J and the threat of the Others, and all. So really, it’s not that much different as you might think? Just because Joffrey’s legitimate in this AU doesn’t mean he’s not an ass, after all – I mean, look at Robert, with his rages and unreasoning hatreds and physical abuse of his wife and son, y’know? A boy being more like Robert, especially with Cersei as a mother, is really not necessarily a good thing. And with the game players playing their games… well, nothing is safe, I’m afraid.
(And for earlier discussion of this AU, please see this tag.)
75 notes · View notes
micasaas · 7 years
Text
Tagged by @oyatetsurou ! Thank you girl! <33
a. - age: 17 b. - biggest fear: being forgotten c. - current time: 11:38 PM d. - drink you last had: wine (I’m really having a bad day.) e. - everyday starts with: a cup of coffee f. - favorite song: Currently? Help by Jake Hill. All time fav? Sky Full of Stars - Coldplay g. - ghosts, are they real: I would say so h. - hometown: In Indiana (unfortunately) i. - in love with: Sugawara <33 j. - jealous of: other people’s talents k. - killed someone: no (believe me I wanted to) l. - last time you cried: today m. - middle name: I don’t have one but I wish I did (oddly) n. - number of siblings: five :) o. - one wish: to make it out of where I am p. - person i last called/texted: called - my dad; texted - my cousin q. - question you’re always asked: “What’s wrong?”/ “Do you have the answers for the h.w?” r. - reason to smile: idk s. - song last sang: Paris - Chainsmokers t. - time you woke up: 9:20ish u. - underwear color: black v. - vacation destination: Italy w. - worst habit: leaving people hanging for days (sorry) x. - x-rays you’ve had: On my ankle when I got hurt and my spine for scoliosis. y. - your favorite food: pasta lol (cause of its variety of uses) z. - zodiac: Pisces
I tag: @cupcakes-and-cash @victorcatsuki @kakuxja @happymikasa @inmyownfiction @guyinlovewitheremika @titan-princess @dany-van-rotten
7 notes · View notes