#implicit romance
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
He would climb into your room through your window. He would sneak in and climb on top of you, kissing and biting your exposed neck. Your shaky, pleasurable sighs only encouraged him to continue, not caring even if you made too much noise. He ripped your underwear and quickly entered you, grabbing your wrists and forcing you with his gaze to moan for him.
Your pleasurable moans made him fuck you faster and faster against your sheets, overcome with desire for you. Breaking up would still be a very bad decision. The sounds of skin clashing with yours didn't help to be discreet. A particularly deep and unexpected moan from him ended the fun, as he felt that he had filled you with all his seed.
He looked at the clock on the wall and realised that it wasn't too late yet. He, to your surprise, laid down next to you, instead of leaving, as he always did. Maybe he could stay until you fell asleep.
-Billy Loomis, Stu Macher, Jason Dean, Kurt Kunkle, Alex DeLarge, Ticci Toby, Kazutora, Ran Haitani, Rindou Haitani, Hanma, Beyond Birthday (BB)
#implicit romance#A small apology for not uploading anything on Valentine's Day#billy loomis x y/n#billy loomis x you#billy loomis x reader#alex delarge x reader#slashers x reader#slashers x you#slashers x y/n#jason dean x reader#jd x reader#creepypastas x reader#ticci toby x y/n#ticci toby x you#ticci toby x reader#kurt kunkle x reader#beyond birthday x reader#bb x reader#death note x reader#tokyo revengers x you#tokyo revengers x reader#tokrev x you#tokrev x reader#tokrev x y/n#ran haitani x reader#rindou x reader#ran x reader#hanma x reader#hanma x you#ghostface x reader
548 notes
·
View notes
Text
please consider scoundrel Crowley, and his (modified) commando droid boyfriend AZ-7
#good omens#ineffable husbands#aziraphale#crowley#aziracrow#this is a star wars outlaws AU#you should play if you haven't given it a chance yet#it's been weeks and I'm still thinking about it#such a tasty implicit romance#that final arc felt very a/c coded#wonderful AU fodder
280 notes
·
View notes
Text
so it was my mother’s birthday a couple of days ago, and as a present my grandma gave her (and the whole family to boot) tickets to a mini london tour with a guide, specifically focused on islington, in russian obviously since she doesn’t speak much english. led by this eccentric gentleman in a bowler hat who’s from moscow but has lived here for 19 years and has been leading guided tours for ten.
the tour was fun and informative. lots of tall tales mixed in with historical facts and local art history too. but the guide himself... man. imagine a cross between eddie redmayne and peter capaldi. 40ish. salt and pepper hair. hooked nose roman profile. educated. witty. storyteller. dresses like some kind of urban wizard or as-yet-unseen incarnation of the doctor. mischievous glint in his eye. learns the name of everybody in the group immediately and chats to you like a casual friend as you walk from destination to destination. i sound like a fucking creep now, don’t i, but what is tumblr if not a public personal diary? don’t think i’ve ever caught a crush this quickly before. started entertaining silly little clara fantasy delusions for a second.
then at one point while recounting an anecdote he mentioned his wife and kids, naturally that brought me back down to reality. here, have a regents canal photo instead

#ivy.txt#never beating the old man fucker allegations#my type is highly specific and completely unattainable#i’m not a lana del rey girl. i don’t want a sugar daddy. i’m a pseudo-intellectual faggot who wants a middle aged humanities professor#need a relationship that people will critique for its implicit power imbalance#when i’d actually be the one he’d do anything for#discourse-starting may-december romance is that too much to ask#‘he’ can be a woman btw. in case there are any 40 year old butches readinf this
18 notes
·
View notes
Text
we can talk about my views on shipping later but i think there is a trope i've pioneered
and it's almost like forbidden love but. not quite
and it's called "i love you so much and so deeply but the circumstances of our lives have aligned such that we are not supposed to be together, so i am going to willingly sacrifice being in a romantic relationship with you as the ultimate expression of my love and respect for you"
#margin rambles#my thoughts on shipping are. complicated. to say the least#probably cause i'm coming at it from a christian worldview and therefore i have a MUCH different perspective on romance than 99% of fandom#because i mean. romance's ultimate goal is marriage and marriage's ultimate goal is to bring the spouses to God#and because of this the majority of shipping culture just. for lack of a better word. disgusts me#and also if you're going to ship two characters i need them to have like. a plausible reason for falling in love#ie you have to give me the reasons they LIKE each other and are FRIENDS. which is another reason shipping is just. usually Not For Me#it has to be compelling. i have to root for them. and their relationship- again- should meet that criteria listed above#about the relationship being geared to make each other better and holier and more in love with each other and with God#(at least on an implicit level for that last one. coming at my media with a christian lens so God Is There#even if it's not explicitly in the text)#and anyway. all of this is why i can count the number of ships i ship seriously on one hand#and also the reason i can count the number of times i've been in love on one hand#(and one of those almost doesn't even count cause i was in kindergarten)#don't know why i'm going on this rant. oh well#mawwiage
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
I was reading The Atrocity of Sunsets chapter 1 again:
It is a perpollo with fem!Percy alright.
And for some reason my brain went: turn it gay perachel.
And it got wilder:
Percy cosplaying as Wonder Woman and Rachel cosplaying as BatGirl in the last Halloween they had before turning 16.
#and honestly would be incredible if they just had to fight a few enpousai in october 31#since people believe it is all a part of a halloween play#sort of#and the twitter/x goes buum “the best wonder woman cosplay”#“who is the wonder woman”#and percy who has no social media only learns about it after rachel shows her the feed fullfiled with pictures of her#it can be like just implicit romance#and when i mean they i mean percy rachel doesnt know how to fight unhappily#it was just something like that#uk what#i will write it and in a few days I will upload it#perachel#gay perachel#female percy jackson#fanfiction of a fanfiction of a fanfiction
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
begging they make maximus and dane a thing and give lucy a girlfriend who is also a new protagonist and NOT WHITE (because the show is lacking on both departments) next season and i can't take anymore straight bullshit into this fandom, i miss when fallout was GAY or really just not as painfully straight as it became in this hellsite after the show
#also cooper x barb for the win#my parents#lucy maclean#maximus#cooper howard#free them all from this weird ass fandom and the awful writting of the “romance”#call me a hater idc#also need more rose x lee because it's a damn crime that we not only get them as just implicit romance#but they are also only there for like 20 minutes of the entire show at best#and then both DIE#SO F THAT#fallout#fallout on prime
27 notes
·
View notes
Text
actually wendell taking the adrenonoxynil from LIV'S MACGUFFIN and pouring it out on a whim was fucking out of pocket. I am so fucking glad Liv drank it and ran off I'm so glad Dang supported her I'm so glad everyone at the table called it out at least jokingly when she comes back and he's kicking rocks about how much of a dumb loser he is until she kisses him. Liv should have crashed out harder and longer idc
#i am using character names but it is actually extremely irritating and a little triggering to me as a player move#like it would have been totally fine to pour your own out and then let people choose to follow suit or propose it to everyone#but to just take everyone's bottles saying “trust me” and then derail anyone else's plan to use their own items is selfish gameplay#and i dont know how much to separate this from the scene but the triggering/gross thing to me is the implicit pressure to yes-and you#idk i am NOT fucking with it. have felt weird about wendell and livs romance all season but this crossed a line. ig i'll see how it resolve#dimension 20 never stop blowing up#d20 nsbu#in character tho something so interestingly gendered about this interaction though. wendell gets to be a big manly celebrated man#and develops The Audacity. liv as kingskin snapping against implicit pressure. russel in the only fem body going to comfort her#i love love loved their solo convo i just want to write a fic where liv as kingskin throws a bigger tantrum and doesnt back down#and WENDELL sincerely apologizes to HER#crit
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Mf will call you the angel of his doom, the muse of his desire and write an entirely discography about adoring you with the devotion of the purest priest, and still you'll ask "do you love me too?"
#romance#bro why do you care your love is doomed anyway#bro cares because it's a love to big to be left implicit#fiction#aesthetic#wattpad#ao3#books and reading#mlm yearning#mm bullshit
2 notes
·
View notes
Text









Telling him about the feelings he stirred within me that I couldn't put into words.
#this is SO. IMPORTANT ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️#last one for now but just !!!!!!!!#the progress!!! the growth!!!! the implicit trust!!!!!!#THEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#romance club#dals spoilers#dracula a love story#dracula: a love story#rc mehmed#mehmed x mc
26 notes
·
View notes
Text
people talking about there not being enough romance is like. it IS there but its harder to identify upon first reading on account of sophie being stubborn and in denial but also kinda dense as hell 😭 also ill be so real howl alleviating sophie's rheumatism is unironically the most romantic thing ive ever read in my life like i dont think yall get it
#hmcposting#unreliable narratorism#sophie and howl facing unlikable asshole allegations#largely implicit romance#bickering as means of flirting#gahhhhhh#this book was made for me specifically i think
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Considering the treatment Persuasion - Austen's most sensitive novel - received at the hands of Netflix (caustic, dim, and ridiculous), one cannot imagine what will happen to Pride & Prejudice.
The thing critical to the novel is that it doesn't slip into modern romance novel/romance film dynamics. Elizabeth and Darcy equally develop in response to one another; it isn't a "woman fixing man" or "man fixing himself for a woman'" story, but actually about a treatment of the development of moral character partially in response to other (more reductive) novels of manners in the period. In this way, Austen is kind of funny because she's poking fun at her contemporaries as well as society itself.
Though I guess you could probably expand upon how conceivably a really bad Netflix P&P adaptation would rewrite this dynamic into our current archetypal ideal for romance, one in that it's ironic first and foremost. They reflect different anxieties and now, different commercial brands.
The "man fixing himself for a woman" angle is one I see defended a lot from the perspective of fairly harmless romance genre fare, but I am interested in mutual character development, and I don't really like stories where the female character is a saint and the male character is searching for forgiveness at her feet... not interesting to me and not really the sort of gender dynamics I want lol. It's a bit weird, since it's still a Madonna thing, not really that revolutionary (in my view) or indeed edifying. To err is to be human, etc.
I understand though that people approach these texts with their own worldview and that is appreciably relevant... on the one hand I think textual purity matters, on the other hand things always change and become transformed. I just can't expect that Netflix - given their track record - could change P&P in a better way.
#on romance once again#I will say though I really hate individuals online who make fun of the “I can fix him” fare because “don't you know men are just bad?”#like first of all no they're not...#it's really weird when they say that about men... like men are just bad by nature is this bizarro essentialist implicit belief#but second of all they always say feminists are lying when they make any class analysis... now what are het/bi women supposed to do lol#idk it's obviously not a compassionate analysis and I have no trouble with pulpy or self-insert fare that knows what it is#it's a different matter when applied to austen that's all
2 notes
·
View notes
Note
Fyi, Jamie now goes by @tragedycoded!
hello, do you have any recs for other writeblrs to follow, especially if their wip's are targeted at adults and include queer characters/romances?
gosh, it feels like it's been a Hot Second since i've been an active part of a writeblr community like we had in its heyday but off the top of my head in no particular order: @ghostcasket (naturally) @reininginthefirewriting, @writeblrfantasy, @magic-is-something-we-create, @magnus-sm-writes,
@ashen-crest, @abalonetea, @howdywrites, @yvesdot, @albatris,
@carnivalls, @zmwrites, @mjjune, @moonshinemagpie, @badscientist,
and others i am 100% forgetting at the moment (please use this post to rec others and if i remember any more i'll add them in reblogs!).
(does anyone know where @fortunatetragedy went??)
#Unfortunately I don't fit this criteria cos I cannot with romance (and most of my queer characters are extremely implicit)#But cheers to everyone else who writes queer romance!!
137 notes
·
View notes
Text
February Reading Wrap Up
⭐⭐⭐⭐ I set my reading goal for February to a grand total of 3 books solely because House of Flame and Shadow was 838 pages and I knew it was take the majority of the month to finish it. I already shared my thoughts about my first book of the month, The Silent Patient (⭐⭐⭐.75 rounded up), in my last post so I will link that here. I personally loved the third installment of the Crescent City…
View On WordPress
#2024#Billionare Boyfriend#Billionare Romance#Book Reviews#Books#CC3#Childhood Enemies to Lovers#contemporary romance#crescent city#Enemies to Lovers#fantasy#February Reading Wrap Up#hofas#house of flame and shadow#Implicit Bias#Lauren Asher#Love Redesigned#Love Redesigned Wallpaper#Maasasins#Maasaverse#My Month in Books#phone wallpaper#POC main character#Reading Wrap Up#romance#Sarah J Maas#Sexism in Media#sjm#Small Town Romance#urban fantasy
1 note
·
View note
Text
Yes, I absolutely do believe it's worth taking a critical gaze at romance novels and films, where "critical" means "assessing and evaluating" and not "find everything wrong with it". And yes, I'm okay with men doing this too.
But also, I somehow think that if I, as a woman, launched a Youtube channel where I read military novels and watched action movies and invited military women to laugh with me at all their silly or improbable or problematic bits, I would not get nearly the same reaction as men reviewing EL James novels.
It's that annoying thing where one does not have to be intentionally misogynistic to be in a misogynistic system, and being on the internet often means that the audience, reach, and social impact you plan on having frequently bears no resemblance to the audience, reach, and social impact you do have.
Also there's a bit of an accountability paradox, where making gestures towards a movement, like feminism, seems to include in its social contract an implicit agreement to be open to criticism when one fails from a feminist lens. Which means that something that seems directed to a hugely female audience feels inherently like a more fitting target for feminist criticism than other things that are objectively worse, but have never made any gestures towards feminism at all.
#honestly I'd love to do this except I'd get anita sarkeesian'd off the fucking internet#feminist discourse#a little cinemasins ticker of 'times this guy has objectively died'#with sidebars like 'scoring this relationship on interpersonal violence danger scales'
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
i'm starting a transcript project like daitranscripts and da2transcripts for dragon age origins.
one thing i've noticed is that zevran is such a different companion compared to the other's. he doesn't have a companion quest.
there's the list of companion quests. no zevran. he's the only one that doesn't ask you for anything, just the implicit protection being with you gives him.
he's also the only one that will offer to stay by your side at the end of the game provided you have a good relationship. he doesn't need to be romanced to stay with you. otherwise all the others go their own way and offer to let you join them.
anyway, im normal about him.
925 notes
·
View notes
Text
I think what's funny about being a very dedicated romance lover is that there definitely times where I actually don't want it in the thing I'm into or at the very least I don't want it to be bland and really boring. I get it, Zelda/Link shippers go way back, but the gestural relationship was always way more interesting as a chaste knight/lady dynamic, and it's just lazy leaning into cutesy wholesome rivals-to-lovers shenanigans. (There are no intended TOTK spoilers in this post). It could not be there, and the story wouldn't really change in BOTW (or indeed even Skyward Sword); it's not achieving overly much except finally leaning into the (ostensible) inevitability of Link and Zelda getting together. Meanwhile - yeah - if I have to draw comparisons, any implicit Beauty and Beast dynamic to Link and Midna actually transforms Midna's character arc and the ultimate tragedy of her disappearance (and inability to reconcile their partner dynamic with who they both are and the nature of the Zelda myth).
Similar to that vein I really don't like companion romances in DW, which is why I feel that (even though she was polarising) someone like River Song was more interesting if the Doctor had to have a romance, but I always preferred the Doctor as a sexless figure/professor/parent type thing. Idk, the companion romances were very clumsy and uninteresting (which is why Donna remains one of the best companions - despite the fat single woman jokes, ugh, I can't believe people say only Moffat's run was misogynistic) and just obviously there to pander to a more familiar format of storytelling by the time of the reboot (self-insert Doctor with a sexpot companion). This is why I really don't like the Thirteenth Doctor's casting as an attractive (relatively) younger woman, just because it's really apparent they weren't thinking too hard about who would actually be appropriate for a Doctor. I don't know if that makes me unfeminist (I don't even like Tennant's Doctor, and Eleven works because he's unconventional) or something, I'm not sure - I think they did her wardrobe well enough but I just can't get over the casting there (and I know she has some sort of a companion romance, again, which it seems like they didn't even commit to with a female love interest, which says a lot. What I'm really getting at here with Thirteen is that I would've preferred a less conventional actress for the Doctor).
But it really comes down to motivated versus unmotivated romance, and sometimes we're not even really talking about the same thing - fluffy superficial shit (and yeah, you can definitely argue Doctor/Rose isn't superficial, but to me it does break part of the identity of DW and the Doctor's dynamic with the companions, and the characterisation of that relationship is exhausting and so fucking boring) is just fluffy and superficial, but from a storytelling perspective I want to be thinking about what these romances achieve narratively. If anything I think what is, say, critical to writing a companion romance with the Doctor is that it should by nature be fraught and taboo, and despite Rose's parallel-world disappearance the nature of them having feelings for each other is just a foregone conclusion and the will-they won't-they shit is just boring romcom bullshit. I find the Davies era mostly unwatchable because of this nonsense now (and then Martha gets saddled with that bullshit too, which brings down her entire run as companion).
I enjoy romance which is narratively justified and I find it tedious and boring when it's shoved in my face where it's inappropriate, which is fucking hilarious because that's a common detraction to the romances I enjoy. But we know it's assigned as a bad faith criticism in these circumstances and rarely do they explain why it doesn't work. But in writing romance, what I think is valuable is asking what it achieves on multiple levels - character, plot, theme - and whether it belongs there, particularly tonally.
I understand it's not a popular opinion (Zelda/Link and Doctor/Rose are huge ships in the General Audience alone, and the reason I think the former especially has been leant into is for an obvious reason) but I think it's worth considering critically for where romance does and doesn't work, because even if those ships are nominally popular, sometimes things are just popular because they hit familiar tropes and feel inevitable and cute.
#on romance once again#bad faith interpretation of this post: aggrieved link/midna shipper bigmad about zelda/link#it's not the same thing and I wouldn't even say I'm nominally a link/midna shipper#same for zelda/ganondorf#not in the traditional sense at any rate#I can recognise with link/midna it's a very constrained narrative and would never be revisited again#it's a gestural mythic totally implicit romantic tragedy
4 notes
·
View notes