#label for me yknow

[moogghost]

the people who link their dni to that "basic dni" carrd that shits on mspec lesbians (in a "dni if u think this group of queer people is real" way) are the most insufferable mfs to exist btw and i am not joking

both in a "queer discourse is stupid you need to go absorb the grass at this rate if u think a queer label counts as a basic dni that should be in everyone's dni by default" way and in a "i'm sick of unreality statements" way

[lesbianmaxevans]

Ana & Alberto || 1.03 ’Aléjate de mí’

[carlyraejepsans]

hey. you probably won't see this, but i just wanted to say thank you for not being a jerk about bi lesbians. it's really disheartening how much hate we still get, and it's nice to see someone just. not doing that.

it's nice to know someone with a (probably?) big blog/account is in our corner.

not sure why i shouldn't be able to see this ask, i am not as big of a blog as some people think HAHAHAHA. but hey you're welcome. I'll always stand behind anyone who defines a label through their personal experience. as long as you're not trying to define other people's experiences for them, it's literally nobody's business but yours.

[csidepooltide]

Trick is finally up on artfight! :) I'm always so surprised at the improvement each year, I'm glad I get to see it in real time!

I always like to compare between years, thought I'd include that here!

[fox-guardian]

have you drawn tim or martin with that meme of someone with their bare chest and the tiktok comment “cover them up slut” above it? i just recently saw the meme and thought your art style would fit it perfectly if you haven’t done it already

akjshdlakjsdha i actually did draw martin with that meme a while ago but i was hesitant to post it because. titty. anyway fuck it we ball

[ID: A digital drawing of Martin Blackwood drawn as the "cover them up slut" meme. The drawing is framed as a cropped TikTok screenshot of Martin from the chest up, shirtless, with his chest on display and a large window behind him, lighting the room a dim yellow with blue shadow. He is a fat, white, non-op trans man with freckles, a scruffy goatee, body hair, round glasses, small gold earrings, and short, bright red hair streaked with white. He looks into the camera with contempt. The comment above him reads "Cover them up slut". His profile picture is a cropped image of him fully clothed holding a book to his chest, and the likes are at "69420". end ID]

[fallenrain40]

reminding myself my aromantic identity DOES fluctuate. I am not less aromantic just becuase I don't always fully feel this way. and that I don't need to put a label on it if I don't feel comfortable yet.

[holysugu]

“I want you to touch me there

Make me feel like I am breathing

Feel like I am human.” — A Little Death - The Neighbourhood

cw — angst w/ comfort, gojo being vulnerable, mention of blood and violence

satoru gojo is a touch-starved individual.

it wouldn’t be your first thought when looking at him. he was so sure of himself. not a single sign of weakness in sight, at least not to the naked eye. if you dug deep enough, you’d see gojo for what he really was. tired.

he came home late one night, shoulders slumped and body heavy. the moon hung high in the sky, painting your bedroom in cooling white light. gojo had tried not to jostle you awake while he crawled into bed, but your pretty eyes peaked open to meet his. even when awoken from your warm slumber, you smile at him. no anger or hate behind your eyes. no depravity, no death. he saw your smile falter, turning into one of concern. your hand reaches up to cup his face, the wall of infinity no longer there. your thumb presses under his eye, tickling his eyelashes with soft swipes.

“are you okay?”

gojo began to crumble in that moment, something he hadn’t done in a long time. his bones gave way and he fell into your warmth. how could you be so warm? it was cruel to leave this warmth day after day.

you let out a soft oof on impact, opening your mouth to question him but shutting up at the soft sighs tickling your neck. you relax, shifting under his weight to get in a comfortable position. you slip a hand into his hair, nails trailing down over his scalp. he shivers, tingles traveling up his spine and through his shoulders. you pause for a moment, watching his back rise and fall. he shifts, head pressing into your hand, silently begging you to please keep going.

gojo had never felt more vulnerable in his life. infinity down, exhausted to his core. you could hurt him physically and emotionally in this moment. tear at his skin until blood coats the sheets, leaving him battered and scarred. you could do anything one’s greedy heart desired, but you didn’t. you couldn’t. instead, you hum softly at him, trailing loving hands over his scalp and back. a smile on your face.

in this moment, gojo was allowing himself to submit to love. to accept the love he never thought would be his and his alone.

to be yours and yours alone.

[arithekitsune]

Femchesters to me, specifically dean is like- dean is basically just the same person except instead of macho man hes now a butch lesbian. Her build is pretty much them same just on a female build. Maybe she has some pretty natural lashes or some sort of piercing or a large ass. No tits though. She’s an AA cup (A cup on a good day) and bitter about it. Sammy? DD. Her mama? Also big. Bobbi? Big. Hell even Castiel has a half decent rack but Dean? Practically nothing. She’s also annoyed with how long Sammy keeps her hair. Loose hair all the way down to her mid back- doesn’t she know it makes her vulnerable? She’s so annoyed with how pretty and feminine her sister is when she herself is all rough and rowdy. And when Dean’s annoyed she has to get her hands on it. Grabbing her boob and complaining how she stole it all or yanking her hair and telling her it puts her at risk. Both times she freezes when her sister makes a little pleased noise from it. And then she moves on. Too turned on and scared of what it may mean. But whatever, on to the next hunt anyways.

[aterribleinfluence]

for some reason I feel like I could make a post with the exact same cadence and frustration that shippers feel when trying to convince people their ship is real, just on the opposite side

[acidhued]

sigh. need to figure out how to break it to my twitter mutuals im not exclus anymore and am very much a fagdyke

[nickbutnodick]

oh and i am definitely attracted to women and men thats about as much sexuality-figuring-out-and-labelling as i will ever do

[kits-ghosts-corner]

Yeah, again, that means nothing. What does a "little" seuxal attraction mean? Compared to who? How do you know? Does gay mean "little to no sexual attraction to the other gender?" No, it doesn't. Because being attracted to multiple genders would make you bi. Just like a gay man who wants to have sex with women isn't a gay man.

Asexuality means nothing because it isn't tied to anything. If wanting to have sex is included in asexuality, gay men wanting to have sex with women would be included in homosexualiyt.

Asexuality has no boundaries and communicates nothing.

The “little to” is compared to the average person’s rates of sexual attraction, if I can put it like that - the usual lack of sexual attraction to other people is the more important part. Asexual folks won’t see most people as hot, even those who are considered stereotypically attractive. Allo people are more likely to feel something whilst watching some shit like Love Island, asexuals won’t. That’s basically it. How do I know…? I’m not sure what exactly that’s referring to, but I’m going to assume it’s knowing I’m asexual - I don’t find anyone attractive. I know that. That’s a bit like asking “how do you know you aren’t hungry” - it’s harder to describe an absence of something than a presence of it.

I’ll point you in the direction of plenty of people having random folks who are “exceptions” to their sexualities; straight men who say their “exception” is Ryan Reynolds, for example, or gay women who say their “exception” is Hozier. We can argue back and forth if those examples are always meant seriously or not, but the fact is that human experiences are varied, and people can still call themselves by certain labels even if they have their own sort of exceptions. Nobody will turn around and suddenly shout “well, if you have this random one-off, then you can’t label yourself as that!”, that just doesn’t happen (at least, I’ve never seen that beyond the internet). The world is a complicated thing and if someone feels a label fits them, then there’s really no need to waste breathe and argue with them about their reasonings. I’m sure you have better things to do than trying to convince people online that asexuality isn’t real (I think that’s you’re trying to argue here).

Asexuality can be different from talking about homosexuality or heterosexuality because it’s an absence of something, or a very great lack of something; I used the metaphor of describing not being hungry before, and I think it’s worth bringing up here again. It’s really simple to describe hunger, but not easy to describe not being hungry at all. People will describe sexual attraction as all matter of things, and it’s much more difficult for me to say “well I never feel any of that”.

Asexuality is tied to a lack of sexual attraction or none entirely (“lack of” being in comparison to most people). Asexuality does have boundaries, but it’s almost like everybody has their own boundaries because people are people and experience things in different ways to their levels of enjoyment. That doesn’t make asexuality less valid. And it still communicates plenty of things - people’s boundaries in regards to sex, how they view themselves and their experience, etc. - it just seems that’s you’re just not willing to understand those or listen to asexual experiences.

[transexualbutchfagdyke]

I like. genuinely get turned off by most dick pics. maybe it's bc he doesn't know good angles but like?? it's so unattractive to me idk

[visdiefje]

I'm pretty sure my experiences haven't changed from when I last asserted my identity labels but my view kinda has I guess

[cryptidmomochi]

did you know?

the insistence by commentary creators on treating children the same way as adults has caused ridiculous amounts of harm.

over and over i would see drama about various artists, and so many of them were just kids. some of them were younger than me, but i didnt know that. i thought they were all much older than me, because that's how they were treated.

"oh this person was a groomer" they were a child. if a child is exhibiting groomer-like tendencies, they don't just get that out of nowhere.

"oh this person pretended to have mental illness or s/h for attention" that is not a thing that normal people do. you look stupid when you say that. just because someone is doing something "for attention" doesn't mean nothing's actually wrong.

"this kid was racist" im from an extremely white, quite cishet, and very able-bodied town (or, at the very least, the town is inaccessible enough that you just don't see that many disabled people, who knows). sometimes you learn bigoted rhetoric, then have to unlearn it. sometimes you say stupid shit because other people around you say that exact stupid shit. kids in particular do not always know better. just because theyre 16 doesn't mean they're exempt from being stupid.

like.

can we stop hatemobbing fucking children. i have at least lingered online for almost 10 years. kids are one of the most likely groups to get harassed, often by adults. im glad i never developed a sizeable following before i turned 18. i wouldnt have been able to handle it either.

but im just shouting to the void, really. commentary creators dont fucking learn. they just hop onto the next bandwagon and ignore it.

do you ever wonder why so many commentary types keep getting into trouble? hopeless peaches, creepshow, daftpina, turkey tom, omnia, prison mate luke, im sure i could think of more given the time and given a little bit more research to track down some old creators i used to watch. good people don't go online and talk about kids like they should be killed. the art commentary community as a whole is rife with toxicity, seemingly always searching for small prey nobody's heard of. I remember a very long time ago there was a "drama" because an artist on deviantart didn't want their art being favourited (they misunderstood what it did) and that was a big enough deal to start making videos about. playlists upon playlists preying on kids being stupid.

if not kids, then any other vulnerable group will do just fine, too. if you remember the "tumblr art style", youll know it had a few main "characteristics"; ambiguous race, hairy legs, character depictions that weren't conventionally attractive, bandaids, s/h scars, drawing the characters with different body types, depictions of mental illnesses and disorders, the works. the "tumblr art style" was, in reality, a dogwhistle. it wasn't about the art. it was about the fact that it wasnt a white, cishet, able-bodied, neurotypical man or woman. that was a topic for a few years. "the problem with the tumblr art style", "tumblr art style cringe", i only knew of tumblr from those types of videos when i was in middle school.

commentary rarely if ever cares about justice. its just another dime in their wallet, and if they have to harass kids to get it, well, that's just fine.

[serendipitous-mage]

why do fire alarm batteries

ONLY

ever need replacing when you are dead fucking asleep

did i enrage god? does she hate me now as i too hate this creation of ours? when will she replace MY batteries