#specification

[todaywold]

realme P3x 5G Price | launched with 1TB Storage | know full Specifications & Features | Mobile Phone

realme P3x 5G Price under $X65 | ₹XX,990 launched with 1TB Storage know full Specifications & Features. See here what are the prices of P3x 5G in different stores. Realme P3x 5G Price, Full Reviews/ Specifications GeneralDetailsBrandRealmeModelRealme P3x 5GPrice$X65 | ₹XX,990 (Note:- See below to know the exact price)Release dateLaunching On 18th FebruaryForm factorTouchscreenWeight…

[poison-raika]

Деградація якості

У сучасному суспільстві сформувалася структура, а точніше погана культура, яка прагне лише ефективності та зниження витрат. Реальність полягає в тому, що вони тиснуть на продукти, щоб «швидко випустити» або «випустити це раніше них», що призводить до зниження якості. У результаті контроль якості відсувається на другий план, і виникає катастрофа, коли розробка або доставка просто завершуються до кінцевого терміну (яким би він не був). Це основна причина спотворень, таких як надмірна тривалість робочого часу, тривалі понаднормові години та смертельні матчі. Субпідрядників змушують дотримуватись необґрунтованих термінів доставки або раптово просять внести необґрунтовані зміни до специфікацій, а робоче місце стає місцем, де вони постійно залежать від милості свого начальства та егоїстичних бажань клієнтів. Споживачі теж винні. «Я хочу, щоб це вийшло швидше» або «Все одно буде тільки так», що спонукає людей погоджуватися на неякісні продукти або тисне на інших, щоб вони пришвидшили події, кажучи: «Я не можу чекати довше (що б це не було), просто вийміть це", що є поганим смаком. Реальність така, що це широко поширене. Як наслідок, недостатньо робочої сили, часу на тестування або перевірки, що немає місця для зосередження на якості немає. На Заході погана культура половинчастого розвитку речей. На жаль, мушу сказати, що усвідомлення та почуття відповідальності щодо якості дуже мало! Мені відомі лише японці, які мають хорошу культуру ретельної розробки до самого кінця, і які мають сильне усвідомлення та почуття відповідальності за якість. Однак навіть на Японію впливають сучасні світові тенденції, що ускладнює підтримку високої якості. Що стосується наших сусідів, то у них менталітет «заробляй скільки завгодно», і вони порушують всілякі права інтелектуальної власності, крадуть, не замислюючись, і з’їдають все, що виглядає як тарган воно роз'їдає світ. Вони, як паразити, висмоктують гроші звідусіль і встановлюють боргові пастки. Це навіть (несвідомо) з’їдає вас. Наявність на ринку лише неякісних товарів може призвести до зловживань споживачів. Ми як споживачі маємо право вибору. Право вибирати хороші речі та право вимагати розвитку та поширення хороших речей. Право хотіти того, що працює, право вибирати те, що функціонує належним чином. Однак ми живемо у світі, де багато компаній повністю ігнорують наші права та розробляють продукти та послуги для власної егоїстичної та односторонньої зручності, обмежують доступ та вживають інших несправедливих заходів. ІТ-компанії є особливо помітними. Я впевнений, що ви всі маєте в голові багато ідей.

<>

[zhoudadudugongjin]

Look I love unconditional devotion love stories as much as the next person, but there's really something so deliciously raw about conditional devotion.

I have served you and I have loved you for decades, but I will not give up my principles for you. You cut out part of my heart and took it with you down that path that you insist on walking, but you walk it alone. Even when the bleeding, gaping hole you left in my chest kills me, I will not follow you.

[gumy-shark]

changing the original. this post is about him now!!!

unauthorized fucking thing. blow him up NOW!!!

[threeicedcreams]

Waht if we kissed on the pokemon legends z-a anti homeless architecture bench,

[arynneva]

wait do people read first person stories and think they're the ones in the story???

Saw people talking about not liking first person, which is fair, but their reasoning was like "I would not do that" and I don't understand that mindset.

First person stories are still about a character. A character making their own decisions. First person isn't about you???? At least I thought it wasn't. What am I missing? I've always seen first person as just a more in-depth look into a character's mind and stricter POV. Not as a reader stand-in.

[starbuck]

“…to me” is one of the most powerful disclaimers we have on here… is this character analysis accurate? debatable. but it’s real… to me.

[stealingpotatoes]

terrible news: the only way to find out if something you create is gonna be good or bad is to actually create it

[aropride]

its crazy how teeth problems can fucking kill you and not only are dental services not free they cost a ludicrous amount and require an entirely different type of insurance than the rest of ur body. aside from the eyes, of course, which need a third type of insurance. What are we even doing man

[alleesaur]

casual blue crab miku doodle

[eternalgirlscout]

i adore being confronted with the staggering breadth of what individual people can get obsessed with. there's nothing better than having That One Mutual with an advanced degree in ancient greek tragedy who writes minecraft youtube fanfiction to remind you that anyone can love anything

[poison-raika]

Declining quality

In modern society, a bad culture has been formed that demands efficiency and cost reduction. "Just hurry up," "Get it out before them," and this pressure has led to a decline in quality. As a result, quality control has been put on the back burner, and the disaster of just developing or delivering by the deadline (whatever it is) has arisen. This is the root of distortions such as excessive work, long overtime hours, and dead matches. Subcontractors are forced to meet unreasonable delivery deadlines, and are suddenly asked to make unreasonable changes to specifications, and the workplace is always at the mercy of the selfish convenience of superiors and clients. Consumers are also at fault. "I want it to be out soon," "It's only going to be like this anyway," and people are satisfied with low-quality products, or they pressure others by saying, "I can't wait any longer (whatever it is), just hurry up," and the bad taste of forcing things to be rushed is widespread. Efficiency and cost reduction have gone too far, and as a result, there are not enough human resources, development time, testing, and verification time, and the situation where the field is forced to do something very difficult continues, and it is also an undeniable fact that there is no room to focus on quality. As for the West, they have a bad culture of developing things half-baked. Unfortunately, I have to say that their awareness and sense of responsibility for quality are too weak! I know only Japanese people who have a good culture of developing things properly until the end and have a strong awareness and sense of responsibility for quality. However, even in Japan, they are being swayed by the current global trends and it is becoming difficult to maintain high quality. As for our neighbors, they have a ``make as much as you want as long as it sells'' mentality, infringing on all kinds of intellectual property rights and stealing with a straight face, and like cockroaches, they gobble up anything that looks like it will make money, regardless of the circumstances, and are eating away at the world. Like parasites, they suck up money everywhere and set up debt traps. They are even eating away at themselves (unconsciously). Having only poor quality products on the market also leads to consumer infringement. We, as consumers, have the right to choose. The right to choose good products, the right to demand the development and distribution of good products. The right to demand products that work properly, the right to choose products that function properly. However, we live in a world where many companies completely ignore our rights and develop products and services for their own selfish and unilateral convenience, restrict access, and often treat us unfairly. IT companies are particularly noticeable. I'm sure you can all relate to this.

<>

[disneyvillainsdaily]

Thinking about Lilo & Stitch makes me really appreciate certain things about the original + the series. Almost every single named [human] character in the movie isn’t white: the only exception being Mertle, y’know, the bratty little girl we’re not supposed to like.

Besides all of the racial representation, Lilo herself is very much a neurodivergent icon, and her portrayal as the protagonist is amazing considering how characters like her are typically either sidelined or depicted in ways to make them less sympathetic/human (modern media does at least a slightly better job at adressing that kind of thing tho).

So all of that is great, but to anyone that hasn’t seen Lilo & Stitch: The Series, it also does some extremely refreshing stuff.

Pleakley gets tons of validation to dress in drag, everyone always referring to Pleakley as “she” when dressed up as “aunt Pleakley.” There’s even an episode that tackles Pleakley dealing with the pressures of his family that wants him to marry a girl and settle down to have a “normal life.” After the episode's shenanigans, there's a realistic depiction of the misunderstanding of a heteronormative/traditional parent with their non-traditional child: Pleakley's mom says that she just wants her children to be happy, but when Pleakley says that he is happy, she thinks he's only trying to console her as she insists, "How can you be happy? You aren't even married." But Pleakley finally gets it through to his mom when he says, "I don't want to be married, mother! I'm happy just as I am."

After getting to meet all of Pleakley's ohana throughout the episode and hearing from Pleakley himself -after all of the previous misunderstandings- that he really, truly, is happy, she's finally starting to understand.

Even though his mom comments as they leave that she wants him to “try wearing men’s clothes more often,” she still does walk away accepting that she simply doesn’t understand her son's way of thinking. It’ll definitely be hard for her since she’s so much more “traditional,” but she’s finally coming to grips with the fact that her son is who he is, and likes being that way, so she’ll love him regardless. She's trying her best.

The portrayal of people with physical disabilities is also great. It’s not because there’s one recurring character with some condition, but almost because there are non-recurring characters. It isn’t in every episode, but here’s an example: they want to show someone at the park playing fetch with their dog for just one shot. They could very easily have it be any a random person, but they decided to make it a lady in a wheelchair. There's another episode where Nani's friends from highschool show up and one has forearm crutches, but not just because she had some recent accident. No one in the episode questions her condition or feels the need to point it out, the only comment on it being that the friend will use the crutches to lightly bonk the others' arms, and Nani jokes, "You are still deadly with that thing."

The fact that they include characters with disabilities when they "don't have to" makes it that much more normal. These people aren't some special case or the main highlight of the episode, they're just another person. They're normal.

There's so much that all of the original Lilo & Stitch media did right, but now the name will forever be tainted with the association of the remake, which I'm sure will have absolutely none of the tasteful writing and ideas of anything prior to it.

[gumy-shark]

i will defend that fictional teenage girl with my life. i literally don’t even care what she did. you would’ve done it too if you were her she’s probably handling things better than you would in her shoes

[biggest-gaudiest-patronuses]

we need more divorcebaiting. how strongly can canon imply (without technically outright stating) that these two characters are bitterly, acrimoniously divorced? essential we explore this