#supremecourt

[captainxtra]

Major June 26th Political Update!

So, Paxton vs Free Speech Coalition and Birthright Citizenship + National Injunction cases will be settled most certainly tomorrow.

Keep an eye and ear out.

------

Now onto the Spending Bill news!

Here is a combined summary of all the updates from the Politico articles I checked:

The Republican-led "megabill" (also referred to as the "One Big Beautiful Bill") is facing numerous challenges and undergoing significant revisions due to rulings by Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough and internal disagreements within the GOP. Republicans are pushing to pass this comprehensive domestic policy bill—which includes tax, defense, energy, immigration, and health care provisions—before a self-imposed July 4 deadline, using the budget reconciliation process to bypass a Democratic filibuster.

Key Challenges and Parliamentarian Rulings:

Medicaid Provisions: The parliamentarian has dealt a major blow to the GOP's health care plans by ruling that several key Medicaid provisions cannot pass with a simple majority. This includes a plan to reduce Medicaid costs by cracking down on state provider taxes, which was expected to generate substantial savings, and proposals to exclude undocumented residents from Medicaid. These rulings have created an estimated $250 billion budgetary shortfall for Republicans.

Civil Service and Pension Reform: Initial proposals to restructure the federal workforce, such as giving federal employees an "at-will" designation and billing unions for official activities, were ruled out of order by the parliamentarian. Republicans are now exploring changes to their pension reform plan, proposing to increase federal employees' retirement contributions to 15.6 percent (from 9.4 percent) to help fund the megabill, though members of Congress, their staff, and federal law enforcement would be exempt. Democrats and unions strongly oppose these changes.

CFPB Funding: Senate Banking Republicans are proposing to cap the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) funding at 6.5 percent of the Federal Reserve's operating budget, a reduction from the current 12 percent. An initial attempt to eliminate CFPB funding entirely was deemed ineligible. This new proposal awaits parliamentarian approval.

AI Moratorium: The parliamentarian has requested Senator Ted Cruz rewrite a proposed 10-year moratorium on enforcing state artificial intelligence (AI) laws, clarifying its scope of funding. While the measure is tied to a new $500 million fund for AI infrastructure, concerns remain that it could implicitly affect the entire $42 billion broadband program. The AI moratorium has also created divisions within the Republican party.

"Revenge Tax": Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has asked lawmakers to remove a projected $52 billion "revenge tax" from the megabill, stating it is no longer necessary due to a "new understanding" with other developed countries regarding a global tax agreement, where central taxes will not apply to U.S. companies.

Overruling Parliamentarian: Despite calls from some conservative Republicans to do so, Senate Majority Leader John Thune has stated that the Senate will not move to overrule Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, emphasizing the importance of preserving Senate norms.

Approved Provisions:

SNAP Plan: The parliamentarian has approved a modified version of the Republican plan to shift some costs of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) onto states. This is a significant win for Republicans, as it allows them to maintain a crucial $41 billion spending cut for the bill.

Internal Republican Divisions & Negotiations:

Medicaid Moderates: The proposed reduction of provider taxes in Medicaid expansion states is facing a "Medicaid-fueled mutiny" from moderate senators like Susan Collins, who find the proposed $15 billion rural hospital stabilization fund "inadequate." Some are threatening to block floor debate without more clarity on Medicaid changes.

SALT Deduction: Blue-state Republicans have rejected a Treasury offer to raise the cap on the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction to $40,000, calling it "unrealistic." This remains a key unresolved issue.

Public Land Sales: Five House Republicans have declared a "red line" against including public land sales in the megabill, threatening to vote against it. They view it as a "grave mistake" and a "poison pill." This provision also faces strong Senate opposition.

Leadership Meetings & Deadlines:

Senate Majority Leader John Thune met with President Donald Trump at the White House as Republicans work against their self-imposed July 4 deadline. There is skepticism among some in the Senate GOP about whether they can get the bill to the President by this deadline. An initial vote to begin debate on the bill is now not expected before Saturday.

Kansas Governor Laura Kelly (D) anticipates that Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), despite his objections to certain bill provisions, will ultimately vote with his party due to pressure from the comprehensive nature of the megabill.

The combination of parliamentarian rulings, internal Republican dissent, and complex negotiations across various policy areas is making the passage of the "megabill" a challenging and fluid process.

------

It seems that the bill is still being worked on so contact your Senators on troublesome provisions, reminding them to invoke the Byrd Rule against troublesome provisions should a procedural vote come before a new text is released.

General Page to call on the bill:

Page to call against Section 203, the provision that targets courts by requiring an expensive bond be payed to sue the government:

Page on AI regulation Ban:

------

Oh and congrats to Zohran Mamdani!

[nichecult]

where were u wen tiktok die

i was at house eating dorito when phone ring

"tiktok is kil"

"no"

[stephen-barry]

You could:

• Be born in New York,

• Have a legal U.S. birth certificate...

• Go on a trip to Tennessee,

• Get pulled over and asked for ID or proof of parental status…

…and if their state law now requires confirmation of your parent’s legal status at birth (because they no longer honor automatic birthright citizenship), you could be detained - or even placed in immigration custody - until you prove yourself.

[yamestheyam]

Biden and democrats need to remove their gloves and take the fight to tyranny. Do they not remember what happened when Neville Chamberlain carved up Czechoslovakia in a bid to appease Hitler? Sometimes historical parallels border on being disingenuous but this is an incontrovertible case of tyranny emboldened and gaining strength because those who stand in its way prefer to play nice in hopes of averting war.

Fighting tyranny is not unlike fighting back against bullies. While Biden and democrats might come out bruised, fighting back reminds the bully that he will not win without a fight. Prosecuting the 6 justices reminds them that while separation of powers is important, slapping down judicial overreach is equally important. Prosecuting Trump in spite of the indulgences of the highest court of the land reminds all that no one is above the rule of law and no effort will be spared to make sure of that. They shouldn't worry that this will set a dangerous precedent. On the contrary, this will set the record straight that there is no place for tyranny in a healthy democracy.

The end does not always justify the means. But in this case, the end must justify the means.

[whenweallvote]

Today the Supreme Court announced it would hear the lawsuit challenging the FDA’s eased  access of mifepristone, one of two commonly used drugs used in medication abortion. For now, access to mifepristone remains unchanged, it is still available.

The Supreme Court’s decision will likely come in June 2024 just a few months before Election Day. In the 2022 midterms and 2023 elections, abortion access was undefeated. Take 3 minutes to check your registration at weall.vote/check.

[insightdaily]

Trump asks US Supreme Court to intervene in deportations fight

WASHINGTON  – President Donald Trump urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to approve his administration’s use of a 1798 law to expedite the deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members. His legal team argues that the courts should not interfere with the president’s authority on national security matters.

In a Justice Department filing, the administration requested the Supreme Court to overturn a March 15 order by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington. The judge's ruling temporarily halted the deportations while legal challenges against Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act proceed. Historically, this 18th-century law has only been used during wartime.

[ivygorgon]

An open letter to the U.S. Congress

Pass the “No Kings Act!”

1,255 so far! Help us get to 2,000 signers!

I’m writing in support of the “No Kings Act,” introduced by Leader Schumer in August. This bill would reassert Congress’s constitutional authority and curb the judiciary’s unchecked power.

The "No Kings Act" addresses several key issues:

Congressional Authority Under Article III: The No Kings Act uses Congress’s constitutional authority under Article III to set "Exceptions" and "Regulations" to the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction. This power has been historically recognized as an important tool to limit the Court's reach, particularly when it comes to cases that could undermine democratic governance.

Neutralizing the Trump v. United States Decision: Leader Schumer’s legislation aims to counteract the Supreme Court’s decision granting former President Trump—and all presidents—immunity from prosecution for official acts. By removing lower courts' jurisdiction over presidential immunity and removing the Supreme Court’s appellate authority in this context, the No Kings Act asserts Congress’s constitutional role in preserving the rule of law and ensuring accountability at the highest levels.

Legal Safeguards: The bill also limits the Supreme Court's ability to review the bill's constitutionality, thereby reinforcing Congress’s role in determining the boundaries of judicial authority. This is not only a constitutionally justified action but also a necessary measure to protect democratic norms from judicial overreach.

If we don’t set limits on the power of a sitting president, or on our out-of-control Supreme Court, our democracy will suffer—greatly. Please support the No Kings Act. Thanks.

▶ Created on September 24 by Jess Craven · 101 signers in the past 7 days

📱 Text SIGN PLBYTZ to 50409

🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW JESSCRAVEN101 to 50409

[justamoth96]

Goodbye, Tiktok

I spent a good amount of time today following my favorite creators on IG and saving my favorite videos. I'm sure I missed some, but it wasn't like I went back and rewatched my liked videos all the time. I didn't save any videos that I made myself, except for one I posted in early December about my dog who we had to put down. (He was 15 1/2 years old).

I'm actually crying over losing TikTok, but all day I didn't think I'd be sad enough to cry. I've been angry in the days leading up to now, and I cry when I'm angry, but that's not what this is. I'm not angry right now. I rarely posted videos, despite wanting to be a content creator, because I knew the app was going to be banned and I didn't want to get attached in that way. But I'm crying. Because I'm sad. Why am I so sad?

Because I'm lonely.

I realized, in the precious minutes after TikTok went down, that I'm lonely. I watched a video on TikTok sometime ago that said TikTok feels like a conversation, and they were right. I didn't need to post videos or comments to feel included, I already was. I wasn't alone.

The last year or so made me realize how on my own I am.

I would put my phone down, but TikTok away, and engage in the real world only to come away with the understanding that no one really knows me.

No one in my life cares about Palestine. I'd put my phone away and feel like tearing my hair own because I felt like I was the only person who cared.

I got to experience other people's niche interests. Sometimes our interests were the same and sometimes they were different, but the feeling was still shared between us.

I followed a woman who didn't start dating until she was in her 30's and that made me feel seen. I followed a woman who looked like me but was braver than me for posting her weight loss journey, and seeing her succeed made me think I could succeed, too.

I laughed a lot, too. I watched the most random and interesting videos that made me laugh so hard I cried.

I learned a lot, too. I learned more about how the government worked than I ever did in any government or civics class. I learned about food and nutrition, I learned about exercise, I learned about the stars. I even learned about other countries, about Palestine, about books, about people.

TikTok was a conversation, and I never had to worry that I was on the outside. I wasn't being stealthily nudged out or ignored, I never had to worry that I was going to say the wrong thing at the wrong time. I didn't have to follow the normal social rules of having a conversation while still feeling like I was involved in one.

I'm going to miss the people. I'm going to miss the feeling of belonging I got while scrolling through TikTok. And maybe in a week it'll be back and this post will me cringe, but it's how I feel. And expressing my feelings isn't cringe.

Goodbye, TikTok. But only for now.

[thetumblerdiaries]

Lend a Helping Hand: Fulfill the Supreme Court's Directive with Qard-e-Hasana

Introduction

In times of need, the true strength of a community shines through. The Heera Group, a respected business entity, now faces a significant challenge and calls upon its members and well-wishers to lend a helping hand. This blog post explores the concept of Qard-e-Hasana and how it can be used to fulfill the Supreme Court's directive while supporting the Heera Group.

Understanding the Supreme Court's Directive

The Supreme Court of India has issued a directive requiring the Heera Group to deposit ₹25 Crores within a 90-day period, starting from March 6, 2025. This court order is non-negotiable and must be fulfilled, even if it means resorting to borrowing. The gravity of this situation calls for immediate action and support from those who have benefited from the Heera Group or believe in the principles of fairness and justice.

What is Qard-e-Hasana?

Qard-e-Hasana is a unique Islamic financial concept that translates to "beautiful loan" or "benevolent loan." It is an interest-free loan given solely for the purpose of helping those in need and pleasing Allah. This form of financial assistance is deeply rooted in Islamic teachings and is considered a highly virtuous act.

Key features of Qard-e-Hasana:

Interest-free

Given with the intention of helping others

Repayment terms are flexible and based on the borrower's ability

Encouraged as a means of earning spiritual rewards

The Islamic Perspective on Qard-e-Hasana

The concept of Qard-e-Hasana is deeply embedded in Islamic teachings and is mentioned several times in the Holy Quran. One such reference is found in Surah Al-Baqarah:

"Who is it that will lend to Allah a goodly loan so that He may multiply it for him many times over?" (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:245)

This verse emphasizes the spiritual rewards associated with providing interest-free loans to those in need. The act of giving Qard-e-Hasana is seen as lending to Allah Himself, with the promise of manifold returns in this life and the Hereafter.

Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) also encouraged this practice, as evidenced by the following hadith:

"Whoever relieves a believer's distress, Allah will relieve his distress on the Day of Judgment." (Sahih Muslim)

This hadith highlights the reciprocal nature of good deeds and the far-reaching impact of helping others in their time of need.

Why Your Support Matters

Supporting the Heera Group through Qard-e-Hasana is not just a financial transaction; it's a demonstration of community solidarity and an act of faith. Here's why your contribution is crucial:

Meeting the Court's Deadline: The ₹25 Crores must be deposited within the strict 90-day timeframe set by the Supreme Court. Your timely support can help meet this critical deadline.

Protecting Heera Group's Assets: By helping to fulfill this financial obligation, you're contributing to the protection of Heera Group's assets and ensuring its business continuity.

Reciprocating Past Benefits: If you've benefited from Heera Group in the past, this is an opportunity to give back and show your appreciation.

Earning Spiritual Rewards: Participating in Qard-e-Hasana, especially during the blessed month of Ramadan, can bring immense spiritual rewards and blessings.

Strengthening Community Bonds: Your support demonstrates the power of community unity in times of need, strengthening the bonds between Heera Group and its stakeholders.

How to Contribute

Contributing to this noble cause is straightforward. You can deposit your Qard-e-Hasana directly to the official Heera Group account using the following details:

Account Name: Heera Jewellers

Bank: HDFC, Mehdipatnam

Account Number: 03658630000054

IFSC Code: HDFC0000365

When making your contribution, please ensure that you:

Use a reliable and secure method of transfer

Double-check the account details before confirming the transaction

Keep a record of your transaction for future reference

The Impact of Your Contribution

By participating in this Qard-e-Hasana initiative, you're not just helping Heera Group meet a legal obligation; you're making a lasting impact in multiple ways:

Legal Compliance: Your contribution helps Heera Group comply with the Supreme Court's directive, maintaining its legal standing.

Business Continuity: Supporting Heera Group in this challenging time ensures that it can continue its operations, benefiting employees, stakeholders, and the wider community.

Economic Stability: By helping a significant business entity like Heera Group, you're contributing to the overall economic stability of the region.

Spiritual Growth: Engaging in Qard-e-Hasana is an opportunity for personal spiritual growth and earning rewards from Allah.

Community Strength: Your act of support reinforces the strength and unity of the community, setting a positive example for others.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Qard-e-Hasana a donation or a loan?

A: Qard-e-Hasana is an interest-free loan, not a donation. The principal amount is expected to be repaid when the borrower is able.

Q: How will Heera Group repay the Qard-e-Hasana?

A: Heera Group is committed to repaying all Qard-e-Hasana contributions as soon as its financial situation stabilizes. Specific repayment terms will be communicated to contributors.

Q: Is there a minimum or maximum amount for Qard-e-Hasana contributions?

A: There is no set minimum or maximum. Contributors are encouraged to give what they can comfortably afford.

Q: Can non-Muslims participate in Qard-e-Hasana?

A: Yes, while Qard-e-Hasana is an Islamic concept, anyone who wishes to provide interest-free financial support is welcome to participate.

Q: How can I ensure my contribution reaches Heera Group?

A: Always use the official bank account details provided by Heera Group and keep your transaction receipt as proof of contribution.

Conclusion

The call for Qard-e-Hasana to support Heera Group in fulfilling the Supreme Court's directive is more than a financial appeal; it's an opportunity to strengthen community bonds, practice faith-based principles, and make a meaningful impact. By lending a helping hand through Qard-e-Hasana, you're not just supporting a business entity; you're participating in a noble act that carries both worldly and spiritual significance.

As we navigate this challenging period, let's remember the power of unity and the blessings that come from helping others. Your contribution, no matter the size, can make a significant difference. Together, we can help Heera Group overcome this hurdle and emerge stronger, all while earning the pleasure of Allah and strengthening our community ties.

[captainxtra]

Some bits from Article:

President Trump is counting on the Supreme Court to limit the ability of judges to put his policies on hold while they're being challenged.

Key Points:

Trump wants the Supreme Court to narrow the scope of multiple court orders keeping his new rules on hold until his birthright citizenship order has been fully litigated.

Court orders that go beyond providing relief to those challenging a program or policy were rare until relatively recently, when they began to plague both Democratic and Republican presidents.

The patten began in 2015 when Texas sued the Obama administration to stop expansion of a program protecting young immigrants from deportation if they were brought to the U.S. illegally as children.

------

Also from article:

------

How might the Supreme Court rule?

The fact that the high court chose this case to discuss universal injunctions could mean a majority want to reaffirm their use, said Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University.

“I would have thought that the faction that wants to end universal injunctions would have preferred a less sympathetic case to do that in,” he said.

The whole point of having a naturalization clause in the Constitution is set a uniform citizenship rule for the entire nation, he said.

“If they were to reject universal injunctions in this case,” he said, “it would be hard to do it in a way that wouldn't also reject it in most, if not all, other cases.”

But Bray, the scholar at Notre Dame University, thinks the court will find a way to restrict or eliminate universal injunctions while also indicating that birthright citizenship is settled law.

While that could mean those challenging the change would have to use a different approach, such as filing a class action lawsuit, Bray said that could be done quickly enough to avoid different rules applying in different parts of the country.

“I don't think you're going to have a patchwork for very long at all,” he said, “because the legal question on the merits is so clear.”

[imajicaagency]

The Injustice Against the Palestinian People

The World and its representative Governments and also the United Nations needs to reflect and comprehend the reality of what has occurred in the region of Palestine and to the Palestinian People and in surrounding regions from 1948 from the creation as perceived an Illegal State known as Israel, with no relative rights to ownership of the lands that was secured to create Israel and from this illegitimate, unjust and unlawful position what has been undertook by Israel and supported by countries outside the region of Israel against Palestine, the Palestinian People and surrounding regions who support the Palestinians has been unwarranted and acts of criminally, human rights violations and war crimes supported by example the US Government and its Agencies and Military, the US Allies, the United Nations represented by the United Nations Security Council and the Australian Government its Agencies and Military since 1948 too present day. The basis of Israel and its apparent rights is baseless and not factual but is a representation of a myth, misrepresentation, untruths, lies and deception from 1948 to present time and beyond back in time from 1948. To date no country or military has come to the aid of the Palestinian People to secure their lands that were bequeathed, stolen, annexed from them to create Israel in 1948.

Imajica Agency is an agency that indicates requirements of justice, clearly to the proponents of injustice for example the Palestinian Peoples.

To secure justice and rights for the Palestinian Peoples and secure justice towards the instigators of the injustice against the Palestinian Peoples.

To highlight and expose the unjust actions that have been positioned from the source to present and hold what that represents account.

Please see attached document.

For more information please email: E imajicaagency@gmail.com

All images, text, design, and art license owner Andrew Rogers©.

Andrew Rogers

Founder, Justice Auteur, Creative Director, Consultant, Writer, Oracle

Imajica Agency

E imajicaagency@gmail.com

[stephen-barry]

*Still Pretending*

John Roberts Absurdly Suggests the Supreme Court Has No ‘Political Bias’...

The chief justice bashed “public officials” who criticize judges for their partisan rulings “without a credible basis for such allegations”.

[vinodkaushikadvocate]

[dannyhellman]

David Souter, 1939-2025

Cover for SCREW Magazine 8/27/90

One of my many cover illustrations for The World's Greatest Newspaper which you'll find in "The View From Screw," coming soon from Korero Press.

#illustrator #illustration #comics #comix #souter #supremecourt #scotus

[aabhapaulht]

Club America VS Queretaro FC Watch Live Match Today #reels

Watch Full Match- https://rb.gy/dcbgqw

watchlivematch #ClubAmerica #QueretaroFC #hamster #ForexMarket #JamesAnderson #MySweetMobster #ONEPIECE1120 #SupremeCourt

[jojou2]

اسرائيل وأكذوبة "الدفاع عن النفس"

ما حدث في مستشفى المعمداني وفي كل غزة هو كمال الإبادة، كمال التطهير العرقي، كمال الإجرام، كمال الوحشية، كمال اللاإنسانية، كمال البربرية، كمال الفجور، كمال الظلم، كمال اللاأخلاقية. إذا أردنا تعريفا جديدا لجرائم الحرب، فليدخل هذا الحدث كأصل للتعريف.

غزه_تنزف

غزه_تحت_الركام