S3: Sara reported August, August exposes Simon's dealing, the crown still hates Simon but he's publicly associated with Wille now and they also have to pretend they are supportive of Wille being queer so they offer Simon a way to cover up the whole drug business. Simon is torn between accepting and taking the moral high ground but most likely also losing his scholarship. August now has a horse he doesn't know what to do with but he doesn't want to sell it because it reminds him of Sara and also maybe she'll come back to him if he keeps it. So he starts riding Rousseau, which is how he meets Marcus, who he runs into at the stables. They bond over treating Simon like shit and become best bros. This comes in handy when he gets kicked out of school and moves in with his bestie when Simon decides to decline the offer of a cover-up, the drugs story gets out and it turns out August lied to the headmistress about who was dealing. As a nice bonus, the entire Society gets kicked out for the same reason. Hillerska becomes a far less toxic environment with the entitled first-borns gone, and Wille and Simon thrive. Sara and Simon have a heart to heart about giving people that hurt you second chances, and Simon forgives Sara in the end. This inspires Felice to do the same. They are friends again. The end.
the way this evolved has me losing my SHIT
i gotta be completely honest, i rotated the thought of Marcus and August being best friends in my head during my entire shift at work. almost non stop. genuinely have been obsessed over it. perfect. ideal. beautiful. they are toxic manipulation besties. they would be so good as friends. i love this idea i genuinely love it. let them be terrible together. im going to incorporate this in everything i ever write from here on out. thank you.
nOW THE REST OF THE ASK-
rip the society. henry baby im so sorry this happened to you. vincent can go tho fuck vincent we hate vincent in this house. JJ grumbled when i was typing that he agrees.
do Simon and Wilhelm get kicked out too? they were involved as well >> i kinda want to see them ending up at Marieberg together, somehow, in this scenario. let them thrive in the mundane together.
also let the siblings talk it out!! yes!! gods this is so good. you're a genius. thank you.
[ young royals season 3 predictions - wrong answers only ]
8 notes
·
View notes
I saw your ask that was about Pomni's prey drive and I couldn't help but draw this cuz of it xD
And if youre wondering why Pomni is wet even tho she caught a bird not a fish- Well I kinda zoned out when I drew this and didnt notice till I was basically already done with it alksd-
But lets ignore that and just say the birds were right next to the lake and she dove right for them and fell into to the like in the process lol
AAAAAA NIGHT THANK YOU........ having your art dropped in my inbox is such an honor... :)
and yeah that's pretty much how it'd go if she had a little less impulse control... they'd be enjoying a nice walk when suddenly pomni bolts and comes back like this... and ragatha just has to go "oh wowww... 😬 uh... 🙁 thaaaanks..... 😬" because if she doesn't pomni will hit her with The Stare
628 notes
·
View notes
*sigh* thoughts on Nintendo's botw/totk timeline shenanigans and tomfoolery?
tbh. my maybe-unpopular opinion is that the timeline is only important when a game's place on the timeline seriously informs the way their narrative progresses. the problem is that before botw we almost NEVER got games where it didn't matter. it matters for skyward sword because it's the beginning, and it matters for tp/ww/alttp (and their respective sequels) because the choices the hero of time makes explicitly inform the narrative of those games in one way or another. it matters which timeline we're in for those games because these cycles we're seeing are close enough to oot's cycle that they're still feeling the effects of his choices. botw, however, takes place at minimum 10 thousand years after oot, so its place on the timeline actually functionally means nothing. botw is completely divorced from the hero of time & his story, so what he does is a nonissue in the context of botw link and zelda's story. thus, which timeline botw happens in is a nonissue. honestly I kind of liked the idea that it happened in all of them. i think there's a cool idea of inevitability that can be played with there. but the point is that the timeline exists to enhance and fill in the lore of games that need it, and botw/totk don't really need it because the devs finally realized they could make a game without the hero of time in it.
154 notes
·
View notes
imagine writing this. imagine writing percy increasingly losing himself to his anger and his resentment, sympathizing with Luke, spiraling, being immensely powerful, burning away at his mortality, and not knowing how to deal with any of it. Desperate for help and the one time he breaks down enough to try and get it (Jason) his worst thoughts and perceptions of himself are inadvertently affirmed. He never talks about it to Annabeth. He never talks about it to his mom. Oh but everyone is aware of it. Aware of his anger. Afraid of his anger. Concerned for him and by him. They give each other looks, worried, because they recognize what a danger he could be — to himself, to others, to the gods. But no one says anything, at least not to Percy. No one helps him. No one intervenes. They don't know how to, it seems. (Or maybe they're afraid to). And so they all pretend everything is fine. Percy pretends, bottling it all up inside until the pressure gets too great and that anger boils over and he loses it all over again. He's so desperate for normalcy that he'll take anything, believes in all of the sweet, sugar-spun tales of New Rome and looks away from the rotting underside. He lets himself believe that once he's there the gods will have to leave him alone, because he's done with it all, he's retired (and the gods always keep their promises don't they?).
Imagine writing what is arguably the well-plotted, compelling, and tragic beginnings of a fallen hero arc for percy and none of it being intentional.
RR's penchant for Percy to be explosively angry and scarily powerful, alongside characterizing him as jaded and resentful and desperate, mixed with his refusal to write any in-depth emotional resolution to any time Percy snaps has created an enthralling narrative of a hero just about to fall from grace. and it's all seemingly an accident.
Oh, and another, amazing, unintentional coincidence? if you're taking RR's word that Percy is still 17, that's also the age Luke was when he failed his quest, marking the beginning of his fall as a hero. Like. The narrative parallels are all there. And without any meaning for them to be.
865 notes
·
View notes