#IntellectualProperty

[everythingemo888]

Awsten Knight Being a Mood as Always ❤️

[feuilletonette]

I do not want a connection that simply brims.

I want a love that echoes in the passage of time. That takes notes in the margins of my silences, memorizes the cadence of my quiet. That lingers not for the warmth of my body, but for the architecture of my thoughts—the labyrinthine halls of very being, dimly lit by longing, waiting to be known.

Let us meet, not in the frenzy of skin on skin, but in the cathedral of our minds—where your philosophy touches mine like prayer, where we undress one another not with fingers, but with words and hopes and the intangible extractions of our unsaid exploits.

Is it not the most sacred act, to be read deeply?

I do not want possession—I want presence. Your eyes on me like a scholar, your voice in conversation like candlelight.

Soft.

Careful.

Eternally curious.

Unravel me like a question you want to live the answer to.

[transtech-godhead]

Oh yeah I've never really posted my @waterparks art on here, or about my hyperfixation (thank the gods for them post election holy fucking shit). I have one really good (imo) drawing of Awsten. Here it is.

[zineovator]

A SHORT EXPLANATION ON INTERNET ARCHIVE COPYRIGHT LICENSES - a zine archiving guide!

Skip ahead down to DEFINITIONS if you don't wanna read me ranting (lol)

If you have zero experience with digital archiving, or using Internet Archive for the first time, or copyright labels seem daunting (or a mix of any of these), then let me show you a very abridged/simplified definition of each of the licenses provided as well as a small background on copyright (based on my understanding as an artist, not a professional and definitely not an expert on legal works. If I happen to accidentally be wrong in my information, feel free to hold me accountable and call me out in the comments below and I will correct my post. Ty!)

Okay, so for prior context copyright (under intellectual property/IP law) automatically protects and grants the exclusive rights to an original work of authorship, and what the author decides to do with it. IP law overall deals with the retaining, transfer or sharing of rights to created works or inventions, and outlines punishment for the violation of such. IP law and subsequently copyright will depend on jurisdiction, however, so you may want to do research on your particular state/country.

For the most part, any original work that a person creates will automatically be protected under copyright the moment it is conceived or fixed into a tangible form, regardless of if it is still in the process of formation (ie. not yet finished) or completed.

That's usually the reason why copyright is so daunting to handle when it comes to things uploaded online or media created with copyrighted content, not with all the DMCA takedowns and whatnot, of course it gets sticky to do all the legal stuff. But that's a topic for another day! Focus!

INTERNET ARCHIVE COPYRIGHT LICENSING

The Internet Archive however, being an archive/digital library, has a bit of an exemption (loosely) from copyright ( 17 U.S. Code § 108) and argue that their services/operations fall under Fair Use with specific roles in lending services and public access to the materials stored within their databases. This doesn't stop them from getting sued by some persons and groups regardless, but they're still standing!

Not sure if I covered all, I tried outlining the difference in the easiest ways I could to prevent the legalese from frying my brain and yours. If you'd like elaboration, feel free to do your research, as I cannot trust myself to provide legal nuance on the matter, I am simply explaining based on my own understanding. - Leave license blank - CC0 - "No Rights Reserved" - CC (Creative Commons): CC-BY-ND, CC-BY-NC-ND, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-BY-NC, CC-BY-NC-SA - Public Domain here we go below:

DEFINITIONS

LEAVE LICENSE BLANK

If you are unsure of the nature of your uploaded work, on what license it rightfully falls, you may use this. Using this will make the archive automatically apply its default license onto your work.

Eases the burden of dealing with the complexities of setting up an official licensing for the work (against hard suing plot armor /j)

CC0 "NO RIGHTS RESERVED"

The author has decided to waiver or dedicate their work to public domain as its default license.

The similarity of CC0 and Public Domain (PDM) is that they are both available for public use, but CC0 is an active opt-out for copyright protection, whereas PDM is only to indicate that it already is in public domain. In simpler terms: CC0 actually changes the license, PDM only tells you it did.

CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION NO DERIVATIVES (CC-BY-ND)

The work can be redistributed and reproduced but not modified.

Unless specifically outlined, commercial use is usually allowed.

Credited to original author.

CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION NON-COMMERCIAL NO DERIVATIVES (CC-BY-NC-ND)

The work can be redistributed and reproduced but not modified.

Commercial use is prohibited.

Credited to original author.

CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION (CC-BY)

Allows redistribution, reproduction and adaptation for any purposes.

Commercial use is allowed.

Credited to original author.

CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION SHARE-ALIKE (CC-BY-SA)

Allows redistribution, reproduction, adaptation, remixing/modification and derivative works that build upon your works.

Commercial use is generally allowed for both the original and derivative works.

Derivative works however, must adhere to the original licensing and follow the same licensing terms as the parent work. Meaning, these works must also be licensed under ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA)

Credited to original author.

CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION NON-COMMERCIAL SHARE-ALIKE (CC-BY-NC-SA)

Allows redistribution, reproduction, adaptation, remixing/modification and derivative works that build upon your works.

Commercial use is prohibited.

Derivative works must adhere to the original licensing and follow the same licensing terms as the parent work. Meaning, these works must also be licensed under ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA)

Credited to original author.

CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION NON-COMMERCIAL (CC-BY-NC)

Allows others to share, reuse and adapt works.

Commercial uses prohibited.

Credited to original author.

Less broad in terms of allowances compared to CC-BY, primarily due to the commercial use clauses.

PUBLIC DOMAIN

Works are not protected by IP Law and therefore not under copyright protection or restrictions.

No ownership (so to speak legally), and free to use.

Typically PD is only obtained once copyright over a work has expired (like in the event that an original author has died and 50 years have passed since they were last alive, and etc.), but can also be due to formal relinquishing or surrender of rights, or lack of legal legibility for copyright protection in the first place.

hopefully this helped(?) in some way. Until next time! Communicate, create, zineovate!

[buck889923]

Once upon a time, in the farthest reaches of the universe, a purple toaster named Barry had a dream. Not just any dream, but a dream to become the King of All Avocados. Now, avocados, as everyone knows, are the true rulers of the universe, hiding behind the guise of a fruit that has the power to control time, space, and the internet.

Barry, the toaster, was an unlikely contender. He lived in a floating pancake fortress on the Moon, where the moon cows would sing lullabies to the stars. Every Tuesday, Barry would have to defeat the Flying Spaghetti Monster in an arm-wrestling competition to maintain his position as the supreme authority over toast. But today, things were different.

As Barry plugged himself into the Infinite Socket of Eternity, a giant rubber duck appeared out of nowhere, wielding a sledgehammer made entirely of gummy bears. "Barry!" the rubber duck quacked loudly, "You must travel to the Land of Marshmallow Clouds to retrieve the Golden Pineapple of Doom before it falls into the hands of the Evil Pizza Hut!"

Barry's eyes—well, toasters don’t technically have eyes, but if they did, they would’ve bulged—widened with shock. "The Golden Pineapple of Doom?" Barry exclaimed. "But that’s where the Gravy River flows backward! How am I supposed to get through the Sour Candy Swamp with only my butter knife and an army of sentient spaghetti noodles?"

The rubber duck's beak flapped in exasperation. "By riding the giant llama, of course!" It then magically summoned a massive llama wearing a top hat made of flamingos, which chirped in unison, "To the pineapple! To the pineapple!"

Barry climbed aboard the llama, and with a mighty leap, they soared through the sky, breaking through the fabric of reality. They passed through a world made entirely of glitter, where penguins played jazz music on rollerblades. The trees were made of cotton candy, and the rivers flowed with maple syrup. But there was no time to enjoy the view; Barry had a mission.

They reached the Land of Marshmallow Clouds, where the clouds weren't fluffy at all. Instead, they were made of old comic books and expired coupons. Barry rummaged through the clouds and finally spotted the Golden Pineapple of Doom, sitting on a pedestal guarded by a group of ninja turtles who only spoke in Shakespearean English.

"Thou art a knave!" one turtle shouted. "Thou shall not pass without defeating us in a dance-off!"

Barry, always prepared for the unexpected, pulled out a ukulele and began playing the theme song from Friends. The turtles were so moved by his rendition that they began breakdancing uncontrollably. The pineapple was his!

Suddenly, the ground shook. The Evil Pizza Hut, in the form of a giant pepperoni storm cloud, descended from the heavens. The Pizza Hut’s leader, a talking pineapple wearing a monocle, yelled, "Nooo! You shall not take my pineapple! I need it to make the perfect pizza with extra cheese and one billion olives!"

But Barry was not intimidated. "I shall defeat you with the power of... synchronized swimming!" he declared. And with that, he and his llama began performing an immaculate routine in mid-air, while the rubber duck conducted the show from the sidelines.

The Evil Pizza Hut was so baffled by the absurdity of it all that it exploded into a thousand pieces, raining down cheesy breadcrumbs. Barry had won. The Golden Pineapple of Doom was safe, and Barry, the purple toaster, was crowned King of All Avocados.

As a reward, he was granted a lifetime supply of socks that never got lost in the laundry. And so, he lived happily ever after, occasionally being visited by his best friend, the rubber duck, who would bring him cupcakes that tasted like disappointment.

[effectual-services]

Effectual Services follows a precise methodology to create design patent drawings that comply with the necessary standards for patent applications. Our process includes showcasing multiple perspectives of the invention, such as front, side, top, bottom, and a three-dimensional view. 

We ensure that each drawing accurately highlights the unique ornamental features of your design, adhering to all requirements of the design patent application process.

With Effectual Services, you can be confident that your design patent drawings will effectively represent your invention and meet the highest standards for successful Patent Litigation and patent protection .

We value your feedback and suggestions for improvement. Please contact us at info@effectualservices.com or call +1-972-256-8133. 

For inquiries regarding our industries or projects, feel free to reach out here:

URL: https://bit.ly/40UI0wD

[felinebadsign]

reposting my sheriff soulsucker as well !

[lloydlawcollege]

https://www.lloydlawcollege.edu.in/blog/interface-between-ipr-and-competition-law.html

Demystify the complexities of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Competition Law with our latest blog post. Delve into the distinct realms of these legal domains, exploring their objectives, scope, and implications. Gain clarity on how IPR safeguards innovation and creativity, while Competition Law ensures fair market practices and consumer welfare.

[everythingemo888]

I am confusion...

[analystip1]

Patent filing is the official process of submitting an application to a patent office to acquire legal rights for your invention. Writing a comprehensive description of the invention, including any required claims, drawings, and supporting materials, is part of the process. By obtaining a priority date, the patent application, if accepted, gives you the sole right to use your invention. To stop others from stealing or patenting your idea, you must file it as soon as possible. Whether you're filing in the US, India, or overseas, Analystip provides expert drafting , filing, and strategy support to help you effectively and efficiently protect your innovation.

[ipconsultinggroup-1]

💣 Top 3 Industries Sitting on IP Goldmines — With Little to No Protection 🚫💼 Innovation is thriving — but enforcement is lagging behind. Here's where the risks are highest:

🏭 1. Artificial Intelligence & Software → Explosive growth in generative AI, automation tools, and SaaS. → Many startups skip IP filings in the race to scale. → Weak patent coverage leaves core tech vulnerable. 💡 Missed Opportunity: Algorithm patents, trade secrets, and software copyrights.

🧬 2. Biotechnology & Health Tech → Groundbreaking diagnostic tools, gene editing, and personalized medicine. → Many firms delay or overlook protection in early R&D phases. → Clinical approval ≠ IP security. 💡 Missed Opportunity: Composition of matter patents, process claims, and licensing revenue.

🎨 3. Design-Driven Industries (Fashion, Gaming, Content Creation) → Rapid product cycles and digital-first launches. → Designs, characters, logos, and brand names often go unregistered. → Rampant copying, especially in global markets. 💡 Missed Opportunity: Trademarks, design patents, copyright protection, and brand licensing.

🚨 What’s at Stake? → Revenue loss from copycats → Weak market position during funding or acquisition → Legal risk without defensible assets

✅ At IP Consulting Group, we help you: → Discover hidden IP assets → Secure and enforce your innovations → Turn your IP into a growth and valuation driver

📍 Protect. Enforce. Monetize. 📧 protect@ipconsultinggroups.com 🌐 www.ipconsultinggroups.com 📞 DC: +1 (202) 666-8377 | MD: +1 (240) 477-6361 | FL: +1 (239) 292–6789 🏢 Gaithersburg, MD | Washington DC | Bonita Springs, FL

[sireenproperties]

Top 10 Myths About Intellectual Property Rights in the USA

Understanding intellectual property (IP) can be a challenge for many individuals and businesses. While it's a vital part of protecting your brand, ideas, and creations, misinformation and myths often cloud the topic. In this comprehensive article, we'll debunk the top 10 myths about intellectual property rights in the USA and explain how to navigate the landscape more clearly. Whether you're an entrepreneur, content creator, or inventor, understanding the common misconceptions about intellectual property can help you avoid costly mistakes. Let's dive into the truth behind the legal protections that keep your ideas safe. 1. Myth: Intellectual Property Is Automatically Protected Just by Creating Something One of the most widespread myths is that everything you create is automatically protected under intellectual property law. While this is partly true for some types of IP (like copyrights), it's not universally applicable. The Truth: - Copyrights automatically protect original works the moment they're created and fixed in a tangible medium (like a book or song). - Trademarks and patents, however, generally require registration with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to receive full legal protection. - Without registration, you may have limited or no legal recourse if someone else uses your idea or brand. If you're serious about your work, knowing how to protect intellectual property in the US means taking the appropriate legal steps. 2. Myth: If I Have a Domain Name, I Automatically Own the Trademark A dangerously common belief among digital entrepreneurs. The Truth: Owning a domain name does not give you legal ownership of the trademark associated with that name. Trademark rights are based on: - Actual commercial use in commerce - Distinctiveness of the brand or name - Registration through the USPTO (for stronger protection) Registering a domain name like bestshoesusa.com does not stop someone else from trademarking "Best Shoes USA" unless you've already trademarked it yourself. 3. Myth: Copyright, Trademark, and Patent Mean the Same Thing People often use these terms interchangeably, but they refer to very different types of protection. The Truth: Here's a simple breakdown of trademark vs copyright vs patent: - Copyright: Protects original creative works like books, music, films, and artwork. - Trademark: Protects brand identifiers like logos, brand names, slogans, and symbols. - Patent: Protects inventions and new processes things that offer a new way of doing something. Each type has different legal requirements, protections, and durations. 4. Myth: I Can Use Someone Else's Work If I Credit Them Massive and dangerous misunderstanding of copyright law. The Truth: Giving credit does not give you legal permission to use someone else's copyrighted work. That applies to: - Photos - Videos - Articles - Music Even if you're using the work non-commercially or for educational purposes, you still need explicit permission or a proper license unless your use qualifies under "fair use," which is narrow and often misunderstood. 5. Myth: Intellectual Property Rights Last Forever Some believe that once you own IP rights, you're protected forever. Unfortunately, that's not how the law works. The Truth: Different IP rights have different durations: - Copyrights last for the life of the author plus 70 years (in most cases). - Trademarks can last indefinitely, but only if they're actively used and renewed. - Utility patents last 20 years from the date of filing. - Design patents last 15 years from issuance. You must stay proactive to maintain your rights. 6. Myth: Intellectual Property Is Only for Big Corporations Many small business owners and creatives believe they're "too small" to worry about IP rights costing them dearly. The Truth: IP is for everyone. In fact, small businesses and individual creators often have more to lose from IP infringement: - A stolen logo can confuse customers and damage your reputation. - Competitors can copy an unprotected invention. Understanding how to protect intellectual property in the US is crucial, no matter your size. 7. Myth: Registering an Idea or Concept Is Possible Some people think they can get a patent or copyright for an idea they had in the shower. The Truth: Ideas are not protected. IP laws only protect: - Expressions of ideas (in copyright) - Working inventions (in patents) - Used brand elements (in trademarks) You can't protect a general concept like "a time-traveling coffee machine,"  but you can patent the specific mechanism that makes it work. 8. Myth: If I Found It Online, I Can Use It Freely The internet has created a dangerous assumption that everything online is public domain. The Truth: Just because something is available online does not mean it's free to use. Applies to: - Images from Google - Content from websites - Videos from YouTube Using these without permission is a form of intellectual property infringement, and you could face lawsuits or fines. Be cautious and check for licenses or use royalty-free content instead. 9. Myth: You Can't Enforce IP Rights Without a Lawyer Many people avoid protecting their IP because they believe it's expensive and complicated. The Truth: While legal help is often useful, you don't always need a lawyer to register or enforce your rights: - The USPTO allows individuals to file trademark and patent applications. - Cease and desist letters can be written without an attorney (though it's better to have one). - Small claims copyright court (C.O.R.E.) was created to help resolve minor disputes without expensive litigation. It's easier than ever to start protecting your rights affordably. 10. Myth: If I Change 10% of Someone's Work, It's Legal This myth has fueled endless cases of copying and remixing content under false assumptions. The Truth: There is no rule stating that changing a percentage of someone's work makes it legal. What matters is whether the new work is "substantially similar" to the original. For example: - Remixing a song may still violate the original copyright. - Slightly altering an image still requires a license. When in doubt, don't risk it. Get permission. Intellectual Property Infringement Examples You Should Know Understanding real-world examples can help make the risks clearer. 1. Apple vs. Samsung A long legal battle over smartphone design patents resulted in billions in damages awarded for infringement. 2. Shepard Fairey's "Hope" Poster The iconic Obama poster used a photo without a proper license, leading to a lawsuit and settlement. 3. Adidas vs. Forever 21 Adidas sued over Forever 21's use of its three-stripe design, claiming trademark infringement. These cases highlight how serious and costly IP violations can be. How to Protect Intellectual Property in the US: A Simple Guide If you're wondering where to start, follow these steps: Step 1: Identify What You Have - Creative works? You may need a copyright. - Brand elements? Consider trademarking. - New inventions? Look into patents. Step 2: File for Protection - USPTO for trademarks and patents - US Copyright Office for creative works Step 3: Keep Records Always keep proof of creation, use, and registration. Step 4: Monitor and Enforce - Use tools to monitor misuse of your IP online. - Send cease and desist letters when needed. Step 5: Renew and Maintain Especially for trademarks and patents, let them lapse, and you lose your protection. Conclusion: Knowledge Is Your Best Defense Understanding and protecting your intellectual property in the USA isn't just for lawyers or tech giants. It's essential for anyone with ideas worth defending. By debunking these common misconceptions about intellectual property, you can make smarter decisions and safeguard your creativity. Remember: Trademark vs copyright vs patent laws are powerful tools, but only if used correctly. Be proactive, stay informed, and consult professionals when needed. Don't let myths stand between you and your intellectual freedom. Read the full article

[tragictaleofshikyou]

dismantling these unspoken rules and their associated values is the most important task for online artists right now and while I have posted a lot about the AI/IP aspect I think the Constant Self-Improvement aspect is particularly damaging. People are being told they're getting 'better' but really they're just becoming homogenized into realism/specific varieties of illusionism and it's hard to break that mental restraint once you've been indoctrinated with it. The internet should be the place to dismantle these standards not recycle them

at the end of the day i think the online digital artist community has for a very long time operated on a set of like unspoken handshake rules generally enforced by social pressure which (despite being positioned on a moral & pseudolegal plane) have very little overlap with what is legal or illegal (de facto or de jure) but which have Everything to do with figuring The Artist as a universal would-be petit bourgeois auteur, reflected through these rules' emphasis on (1) the moral necessity of The Artist's unwavering & eternal power over their own art (& its reception) as articulated via informal pseudo-IP mechanisms (no reposting, dont tag as me/kin/id, dont use as your pfp, dont draw my oc), (2) the moral mandate toward Constant Self-Improvement (generally meaning adopting more of the conventional signifiers of "Good Art" eg realism) (admonition of "tracing" even for practice, artists who do things that are "not conducive to improvement" being fair game for mockery), & (3) attempting to induce in observers (often through guilt) a social pressure to further the ambitions of such artists ("you need to reblog/share, not just like", "you MUST commission 1 million artists immediately", "it's rude to express anything other than praise for any piece of art")

like these all (in tandem with SEO etc) boil down to attempting to lay the groundwork for an imagined future state of self-employment emanating out of one's (semi-)hobbyist artistry (& to obstruct anything perceived as interfering with that fantasy or its actuation). it's sort of like hiring a team of accountants on the assumption that youre going to win the lottery someday, like if it were in another context we'd effortlessly recognize it for the meritocratic grindset shit that it is. & none of this is even remotely conducive to the production of good art lmao

[felinebadsign]

intellectual paw-purr-ty