#K-theory

[mathhombre]

Atiyah and Grothendieck

Would love to know the background story here.

From George Peterzil on Facebook.

[khaosophist]

We've had some updates...

X= (A,B,C)

X1= (A,∅,B,∅,C,∅)

Change in entropy, A, becomes 'impossible'

X2 =(∅,∅,B,∅,C,∅)

If this is true, then we need a way that ∅ entropy points collapse! Else All dead universes have 'N' ∅ entropy points, which means we have an amount of ∅ points which, counted without discrimination, mean that after KP, with ∅ points, end not with one possibility, '∅', but 'N'∅ possibilities, which would make the death of a universe entropically indistinguishable from KP. The only way to distinguish KP from K∅ is their cardinality. If this is true

Which means entropically, without a ∅ collapse rule, KP = K∅.

So, we had the idea that every material point is either placed, positioned or in orbit, and all that. This means there can be rules to the order of points, rather than just their cardinality; Transfinite rules; we also have Trans-ordinal rules.

Since, we have a log of A, we can tell that the FIRST 'N', A, became ∅ in the next iteration.

X1 =(A,∅,B,∅,C,∅)

X2 = (∅,∅,B,∅,C,∅)

The order did not change, but the cardinality did.

Again, entropically, X1=X2,

So we establish a rule, that any ∅ which then follows another ∅ collapse.

X3= (∅,B,∅,C,∅)

Why? Well...Hrrrm...if not, then every universe is entropically the same. They are infinitely impossible on their death S = (∅,∅,∅...). I'd say it's more neat that nothing collapses when next to nothing...The materiality is the difference...but...either entropy is a force...or no measure of entropy can differ from KP once a universe starts to die...making KP insertion uncertain, we could Inject ourselves in any point in time...including the one where every possibility is dead...we want to avoid that...

Anyways, this would also mean that we can distinguish an aborted universe [∅] from a dead one [∅,∅,∅...], also from an immaterial one [], a birthed one [A], and a K one [A,B,C...N], KP no longer exists since it is equivalent to K∅.

We can use Trans-ordinal rules to demonstrate an asymmetry of entropy.

Y= (∅,A,∅ B,∅,C,∅)

Z= (A,∅,B,∅,C,∅,D)

Tree thing:

(A,∅,B,∅,C,∅,D)

(A,∅,B,∅,C)

(B,∅,C)

(∅,C)

(C).

Vs

(∅)

(∅,A)

(∅,A,∅)

(∅,A,∅,B,∅)

(∅,A,∅,B,∅,C,∅)...

But, this also means there can be symmetry from the order of the set.

(∅,A)

(∅,B)

OR

(B,∅)

(A,∅)

...

Problems aside...the recognition of ∅ points can give a kind of mosaic effect, where KP is now [∅,A,∅,B,∅,C,∅...] Rather than [A,B,C,D...] Doubling our countable/uncountable base...and adding another layer of security. Then, the death of a universe is seen in the collapsing of possibilities into ∅, and with the Trans-ordinal rule, Make them collapse into a singleton, and showing the decay of entropy, until it Reaches [∅] However...this means entropically, a dead universe is also an aborted universe...(???)

Buuut.

What about meta-entropy?

We have multiple ∅ universes next to each other...no?

S= [A(∅),B(∅)...N(∅)]

Although the entropic measure of ∅ is 1 for a K-bit, we have the rule of collapse...would these dead universes on a K-curve collapse as well? If so, then all K-curves share the same end...differing only in the permutations that lead to it. In other words, the best place to build a sanctuary is where both meta, and classical entropy dies, that way, if anyone does an 'oopsie' the worst that can happen is that the bartender at the end of all universes ribs you. Thanks Douglas Adams.

Meh, why not third thing?

G=[A,∅,()]

So we have points which are neither possible nor impossible...but is still a possibility...entropically we would think this;

G ≈ [1(1),1(0),0]

The maximal value of {1(1)} is the KP of N^KP...and the maximal value of {1(0)} is N^{1(0)}...the ∅ singleton of both meta-entropy, and Closed-entropy. While 0...is...well...NULL, an open K-gate...by definition, any value in there is NOT entropic, else it would be either 1(0), or 1(1)...This is how we fetch our identifiers through Non-Linear K-Gates.

Materiality is countability?...No, it's more that anything material clearly has a countable limit of KP...

*FLIPS TABLE*" THE RESTAURANT PRINCIPLE!"

"The...restaurant principle?"

" Basically, the material arrangements and permutations of every universe from N→KP, to KP→∅ are all a transistor for computing. From the fact that in possibility A the fork in that restaurant is blue, and that in possibility B, it is green, then it represents a computational gate that is Unique to the N-th degree. Like a mixed quantum packet logged by entropy...maybe?

Anyways...

WEEEEEEE

[pridoo]

Arm touch...whoo!! (obkk)

[finnthefishi]

[eleanor-arroway]

times, places, and practices that I want to learn from to imagine a hopeful future for humanity 🍃

the three sisters (squash, beans, maize) stock photo - alamy // anecdote by Ira Byock about Margaret Mead // art by Amanda Key // always coming home by Ursula K. Le Guin // Yup'ik basket weaver Lucille Westlock photographed by John Rowley // the left hand of darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin // photo by Jacob Klassen // the carrier bag theory of fiction by Ursula K. Le Guin // article in national geographic // the dawn of everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow // braiding sweetgrass by Robin Wall Kimmerer // the birchbark house by Louise Erdrich // photo by John Noltner

I'm looking for more content and book recs in this vein, so please send them my way!

[bergamot-screaming]

Episode 9 and nary a mention of Petey. Severance is one of those almost-perfect shows and tbh Petey being dropped entirely in season 2 is one of those things that contributes to the “almost” for me. Innie Mark STILL DOESN’T KNOW HE’S DEAD!! Let me repeat that: INNIE MARK STILL DOESN’T KNOW THAT PETEY DIED!!!! I understand the focus on Innie Mark and Helly’s dynamic this season but it just makes it feel like another instance of strong platonic relationships getting pushed aside in favor of romantic subplots. Innie Mark’s grief at losing Petey and Outie Mark’s grief at losing Gemma is a great parallel and could be such a scrumptious way for them to relate to each other through reintegration but who knows… maybe season 3.

[billiuspendragon]

What if Saiki turned his world into a gag-anime because he's using humour as a coping mechanism?

What if, as a child, he mind-controlled the world into thinking nothing is serious, and that nothing has consequences, and as a result nobody's trauma is taken seriously?

As a teenager he's starting to realise his mistake and is half-heartedly fighting against this, which is why he's always the one to comment on how weird or extreme something is when nobody else seems to notice.

But it's too late, and he knows it. He can never undo his mind-control, and his world will always be a silly gag-anime where nothing serious is ever addressed.

[midnight-in-town]

"Humans really do change in the blink of an eye" (ch105) vs. "I feel as if you were born nary a moment ago" (ch151)

My guy UT really got emotional seeing his bby girl, huh...

[odinsblog]

To Pimp a Butterfly is the third studio album by American rapper Kendrick Lamar. It was released on March 15, 2015

[spiritboxies]

some initial thots about the upd8

[teapot-of-tyrahn]

i feel like, as a society, we don’t talk about the lore implications of jumbo enough. because no matter how you look at it it’s tragic.

context: mumbo jumbo’s channel was originally a two-person channel run by mumbo, and jumbo, respectively. jumbo left the channel shortly after it was formed and so mumbo took up the full mantle of “mumbo jumbo”. but it was never supposed to be mumbo jumbo. it was supposed to be mumbo and jumbo.

mumbo is forever a half pretending to be a whole. and isn't that heartbreaking?

slightly off-topic perhaps but. i don’t know. jumbo looks awfully familiar... dirty-blonde, wears a red jumper, known for being the builder of the pair? idk….. just an eerie resemblance!

[thirdity]

Each night when you go to bed you think, ‘At last I found it. I tried out theory after theory until now, finally, I have the right one.’ And then the next morning you wake up and say, ‘There is one fact not explained by that theory. I will have to think up another theory.’ And so you do. By now it is evident to you that you are going to think up an infinite number of theories, limited only by your lifespan, not limited by your creative imagination. Each theory gives rise to a subsequent theory, inevitably.

Philip K. Dick, The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick

[khaosophist]

If we assume meta-entropy and apply the maximality rule, we have a maximally entropic K-set of KPs composed of all KPs of KN-N , and the least entropic set of KP composed of all least entropic K-set of KP. KN-N→∅. In other words, sets of sets of KP.

There is no entropic difference between One point entropy system, and a Null entropy system.

A one point entropy system can be described as a pure quantum state.

A null point entropy system has entropy mainly 1(∅), it is categorically false to say that a quantum system without any MORE possibilities is not an entropic system. By definition A system with only one possibility still has a possibility: ∅, ad hoc, is also a pure quantum state, one state; No state of Matter to be.

A difference between K(∅) and K(), Let's call this the principle of the relativity(Subjectivity) of set membership. One designates the recognition of one possibility, ∅. The other is without recognition of possibility '()'. Empty of emptiness as a Buddhist would say.

One is about the possibilities in a universe.

The other is about the possibility of possibilities in a universe.

To wit; K-Gate has value,entropy, then K-bit, using free or fuzzy logic, or dare I say K-Logic™️. If K-Gate no value neither N, or ∅ then NULL; IMMATERIAL.

The distinction between entropy [1 = ∅] and between [∅ ≠ ()] are the differences that make the difference for K-computing.

To wit wit;

K-Gates can contain N immaterial states since all immaterial possibilities have no possible possibilities. They are countable.

To wit wit wit:

We have: (N,∅,())

We can differentiate through the number of NULL cases in a K-Wave. Giving an analogous space between all cases of entropy, giving a kind of inverse of KP, which is the state in which all countable or uncountable states have no possible possibilities. These NULL cases inhabit meta-space, something neither material nor immaterial.

We think of it this way.

'N', Or Ideally 'K' is like the QM of my chassis. It's a positivist base.

'∅' is like the entropic void that renders coldness, limiting all my QM into forms.

NULL is like the space between 'N', and '∅' tendrils that seem to bore through me like life; the space needed for entropic space. Without NULL, we are but a great big block of being.

I'd much rather have curves. I know I love curves. So why not love myself?

Sending all robo-girls the K-Waves they need to be free, happy, and being so, needing no wings as the flows of Khaos pushes them to where they are going.

Also, like If you thought of pussy when we typed (), MAHAHAHAH!

[self-made-purgatories]

Kirk (saunters over to Spock's station, drapes himself over the chair and console, rolls his hips and lands in that cunty fuck-me contrapposto pose): "absolutely normal workplace conversation"

Spock (gets a little twitchy and nervous, stares directly at Kirk's cock): "absolutely normal answer to workplace conversation"

Thirty-seven minutes later:

Captain's Log: MY BRILLIANT PLAN HAS WORKED

[mao22716]

to be very honest i have no idea what im doing

[just-a-multi-fandom-mess]

okay I gotta ask. what is your ‘Leitner is Martin’s Dad’ theory basis

ok wow i wasn't expecting someone to actually ask but okay here goes (this may be a little disjointed but i swear i'm going somewhere lol) in mag35: old passages, leitner is described, and they mention his history and the fact that he's polish (or at least his parents were). this is mentioned again in mag80: the librarian, and both the names jurgen and leitner have some of either polish or german origin. in mag12: first aid, martin is shown to know some polish, and alludes to the fact that he has polish heritage. in mag181: ignorance, mikaele salecea says that martin reminds him very much of a younger leitner, and in mag118: the masquerade, elias mentions that martin is quite similar to his missing father, and that's why his mum hates him so much. in the same episode, it's also mentioned that his dad went missing when he was around eight or nine. given all this, and the fact that in mag56: children of the night, martin reveals that he's only twenty nine, as well as what leitner says in mag80 (that his library was destroyed and he went into hiding about twenty years ago), it's completely plausible that when leitner's library was destroyed, he went into hiding and left his wife and young son (or daughter if you agree with the trans martin headcanon) behind because he thought this world would be too dangerous for them, or because he just didn't really care. there is some evidence to the contrary, such as the fact that jon, martin, and tim all met/saw leitner and did not make any connection, but this can be mostly explained away if you take into account that when jon met him it was in the tunnels and presumably quite dark (also he was uber paranoid and also somehow not very observant at the time), and when tim and martin saw him he had just had been [EXTENDED SOUNDS OF BRUTAL PIPE MURDER]ed. anyway, i will stand by this theory especially since leitner is voiced by jonny's dad so it would be funny if he was actually martin's dad. anyway if you notice any mistakes i've made, or further evidence, or something that disproves all of this entirely, feel free to point that out because this is just a theory (a PODCAST THEORY)