#Pavlov hierarchy of needs

[sterlingtonki]

Pavlov hierarchy of needs

DOWNLOAD NOW Pavlov hierarchy of needs

#PAVLOV HIERARCHY OF NEEDS HOW TO#

At work, it’s also important to feel that your physical safety is valued and prioritized. For example, one of your priorities might be to provide a safe living space for your family, which is why you work hard to provide for that need. It is natural to worry about your own safety and the safety of your loved ones. Safety is another vital need that can impact your overall satisfaction with your workplace. Related: 31 Words Describing Company Culture 2. When applied to the workplace, one of your physiological needs is also a steady income to support yourself and pay for somewhere to live, food, utilities and other essential needs. You need access to a restroom, a place to get drinking water, breaks to eat meals and snacks, and a comfortable working environment. Employees need access to vital services and opportunities while at work to feel their most basic needs are being met. The physiological needs in this hierarchy refer to the most basic human needs. Each need builds on the last, allowing a person to feel more fulfilled, which in turn encourages motivation and creative thinking. When applying Maslow’s hierarchy of needs in the workplace, you need to understand the needs and how they impact motivation.

#PAVLOV HIERARCHY OF NEEDS HOW TO#

Related: How To Develop a Positive Work Environment in 6 Steps The 5 levels of Maslow’s needs Without fulfillment on the level below in the hierarchy, a person cannot progress because they will lack the motivation to do so. The hierarchy is often depicted as a pyramid to represent the need to fulfill the lower levels before an individual can move up to the next level. Within each level are specific needs that allow for an individual to feel fulfilled.

This hierarchy-also referred to as Maslow’s theory of motivation-includes five levels of human needs: physiological, safety, love and belonging, esteem and self-actualization. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is a motivational theory in psychology.

DOWNLOAD NOW Pavlov hierarchy of needs

[namelessenbytime]

Pavlov's hierarchy of needs

[ghostoffuturespast]

Tagged by @shimmer-like-agirl for a WIP Whenever. Thank you kindly! 🧡

I've mostly been doing a lot of transcribing, organizing, cutting, and rearranging to iron out the speed bumps so I can actually get to slapping my own words on the page. This is all I have of the next chapter at the moment. Already off to a trippy start :

The plan was fucking suicide. Yet, it was the only logical solution forward. Insane as it was. The same mistakes, with the same results. Flipping the case on both the switches, pushing the buttons on both the detonators, and watching it explode. Failing to escape its radius. But that was the nature of it. Pavlov’s needs. Maslow’s dog. You just couldn’t deny it. The hierarchy of survival would make you drool every time the bell rang. Whenever the reaper came knocking through half-deserted streets to make his visit. So, here they were. Two brain-dead gonks in one body, well past the eleventh hour, loitering in the parking lot and booking a one-way ticket to the Afterlife. To pay their final respects to Night City’s most sanctimonious and malevolent of gods. V exhaled a blessed wash of smoke from his lungs, sating their craving for nicotine and bending to the reptilian will of one more inhale. Johnny brought the cigarette to her lips to take another drag. A pattern. A rhythm. Of repeated histories and constantly sliding back.  That hope of another breath. And another. The one song that every living thing marched to. Went to war for. But there were no assurances, and no insurance, for situations like these. Johnny flicked the ash off with her left fingers and V wondered how his cigarette had ended up in the wrong hand.

Here's all the previous chapters for So It Goes.

Tagging, with no pressure: @morganlefaye79 @merge-conflict @corpocyborg @mynonsenseistingling @darlingicarus @aggravateddurian @genocidalfetus @tarmac-rat @fly-amanitaa @dani-the-goblin @luvwich

Your WIPs don't need to be writing or even CP2077 related, I'm happy to see what you all are working on regardless of what it is! And if you're names not on the list, and you wanna share you're WIPs with me, tag me and I'll come find you!

[fruityyamenrunner]

In 1928, I treated a man who suffered from masochistic perversion. His lamentations and his demands to be beaten blocked any progress. After some months of conventional psychoanalytic work my patience wore thin. One day, when he asked me again to beat him, I asked him what he would say if I actually did. He beamed with happy anticipation. I took a ruler and gave him two hard slaps on the buttocks. He yelled aloud; there was no sign of pleasure whatsoever, and from that time on such demands were never repeated.’ This, says Reich, convinced him that it is untrue that masochists derive pleasure from being beaten. And then came a ‘truly fantastic idea’: that ‘the masochist wishes to burst and imagines that torture will bring this about’. That is to say, the masochist is full of desires that he dare not express, and they have the effect of making him—figuratively speaking—blow up like a balloon. But in the case of human beings, the balloon cannot burst, because the person has developed a kind of ‘armour’ to hold it in, like a child struggling to hold back his tears. So an intolerable tension is created, an inner pressure that cannot find release. Being beaten, says Reich, is an attempt to find such release, a desire to be struck until the balloon bursts. The alternative would be to find—with the help of Reichian therapy—an ‘orgastic discharge’. But what is it that is discharged in such a moment? Not just semen, for an orgasm without pleasure does not reduce tension. It must be some form of biological energy—the energy Reich was seeking to measure with his electrical machines.

This reasoning sounds convincing until it is examined more closely. To begin with, can we really accept that neurosis is due to the clash between biological and social demands (fame, ambition, etc.)? It is easy to see that many young men would enjoy making love to every pretty girl they meet, and that social taboos make this impossible. But is it really society that is to blame? Surely, the girls themselves would have some objection? And their objection is just as ‘biological’ as the young men’s desires. Neurosis can be caused by the conflict between social and sexual desires; but it is not always so. A few years later, Abraham Maslow produced a more balanced theory in the concept of the ‘hierarchy of needs’—that the most basic need of all living creatures is for food and security; after that, sex (and love); after that, success and fame (self-esteem). A man could be satisfied on the sexual level, and still become neurotic out of unfulfilled self-esteem.

Reich’s theory of masochism is open to a more basic criticism. He seems to prefer to ignore the sexual component. Magnus Hirschfeld has a chapter on masochism that makes it clear that in the majority of cases, masochism is sexual in nature. A schoolboy enjoys being beaten because the mistress—an attractive young woman—removes his trousers before bending him over her knee; she often allows her other hand to stray to his genitals as she spanks him. A young man enjoys lying on the floor, while his pretty cousin stands on him in high-heeled shoes, allowing him to look up her dress to her underwear; as a climax of the ‘game’, she presses her foot on his penis, and he has an orgasm. A girl has a fantasy in which she is bound and naked on a butcher’s slab; the butcher prods her all over, as if trying to decide on the best cuts, then inserts a finger in her vagina—which causes an orgasm. In none of these cases can we see any evidence of Reich’s ‘desire to burst’. There is simply an association of pain with sexual pleasure, so that pain ends by evoking sexual pleasure, as the ringing of a bell caused Pavlov’s dogs to salivate when it became associated with food. And because Reich wilfully ignores this psychological component, he fails to see why his patient did not enjoy being struck with a ruler. For the masochist, the person who is beating him is an object of sexual desire, the real cause of the excitement. A grim-faced psychiatrist wielding a ruler bursts the soap-bubble of illusion. The actress Florence Farr used to practise the same technique on love-sick swains; she would lean forward, grab them by the head and make them kiss her and then say: ‘Now let’s have a reasonable conversation.’ The treatment was intended to extinguish romantic desire, and seems to have succeeded.

this reminds me a little of the sexless way some people talk about, and i presume actually perform fantasies about, "kink", a sort of dramatic magickal performance of a release of Reichian cum-energy, with no pretentions or even presence of simple sexual desire.

[perfect-vantage]

The Scientific Consensus

Aristotle on animals

Humans have studied animal intelligence for thousands of years. In the 4th century BCE, Aristotle wrote his famous History of Animals, which explored the subject in detail.Aristotle believed that animals possessed a form of basic intelligence. He gave the nest-building abilities of certain birds as an example of “pre-eminent intelligence.”But this intelligence differed from human intelligence in terms of quantity; humans had more, while animals had less. He called this the Scala Naturae, or ‘Ladder of Being’ – a natural hierarchy with humans at the top, and all other species underneath.

Edward Thorndike

At the end of the 19th century, Edward Thorndike became one of the first scientists to study animal intelligence in a laboratory setting. He pioneered a school of thought which later became known as behaviorism.

Thorndike wanted to know if an animal could intelligently learn the solution to a problem. He put a cat in a box, then showed the cat how a lever would open the door. If the cat was intelligent, it would learn from the demonstration.The cat did not learn from the demonstration. It only learned through trial-and-error: it stood on the lever by accident, saw the door open, and exited the box. Thorndike decided this type of learning was random, and not a sign of intelligence.

Operant conditioning

After his experiments on cats, Edward Thorndike established what he called the law of effect: when an animal’s behavior leads to a positive outcome, like the door to a puzzle-box clicking open, they will repeat that behavior in the future.In the early 20th century, Thorndike’s law of effect was built upon by scientists like B.F. Skinner and Ivan Pavlov. It developed into the theory of operant conditioning.

This theory argued that animal behavior is constantly shaped by trial-and-error. If a random behavior leads to a reward, the animal will repeat it in the future. If a random behavior leads to a punishment, the animal will avoid it next time.Operant conditioning suggests that animals are simple and machine-like, and not capable of intelligent thought.

Wolfgang Köhler

Operant conditioning was a dominant theory in the 20th century, but it was not the only theory of animal intelligence. It was challenged by a German psychologist, Wolfgang Köhler, who wrote a famous book called The Mentality of Apes.

He observed that, when a chimp was confronted by a novel problem, it would stop, and think, before coming up with a solution. Often, this solution would work first time. For example, they might stack some boxes in order to reach a banana, without trying other behaviors first.Köhler described his chimps as “unwaveringly purposeful,” and argued that they were solving problems through intelligent insight, as opposed to trial-and-error conditioning.

Evolutionary approachThe debate between conditioning and insight is still ongoing, but most modern scientists believe in a compromise. While animals (and humans) can learn through conditioning, they are also capable of intelligent, insightful thought.The next question to ask was whether this rule applied to every animal species. In the 1980s, some scientists believed in a null hypothesis: that every species, apart from humans, had exactly the same intelligence.But in 1987, American psychologist Alan Kamil wrote a pioneering article: A synthetic approach to the study of animal intelligence. He argued that every species had a unique intelligence, just as it had a unique anatomy.It came down to evolutionary pressures. Animals evolved a type of intelligence which best suited their specific needs.

Modern studiesIn the 21st century, studies into animal minds are becoming more and more advanced. Many of these studies focus on the ways that different animals have evolved their own types of intelligence.

Laboratory experiments are often used to study smaller animals. They are placed in mazes, given memory tests, and asked to respond to images. Meanwhile, field studies observe how animals behave in their natural habitats, especially larger species, like whales.Functional MRI scans can be used to study neural activity, but only in certain species. Animals must be trained, or restrained, before entering the scanner. A crocodile brain was successfully scanned in 2018, but only after the animal was sedated, and its mouth taped firmly shut.

Logical Intelligence

Can animals solve problems?

For more than a century, psychologists have studied logical intelligence in other species. Edward Thorndike was one of the first, with his experiments to see whether cats could escape from a simple puzzle-box.

A cat in a box

Escaping from a box is an example of logical problem-solving: overcoming an obstacle in order to achieve a goal. Modern researchers use similar tests, as well as observing animals solving problems in the wild.Logical intelligence is often linked to tool use. As recently as the 1960s, people thought that tools were only used by humans, but this is not the case. Crows make hooks out of twigs, octopuses carry armor, and even crocodiles have been seen setting traps for unsuspecting birds.

Tool use in mammals

Primates are adept at using tools to solve problems. Chimps use sticks to fish for insects, and make pointed spears to hunt for small animals. Gorillas use logs to test the depth of a river before trying to walk across.Primates are not the only mammalian tool-users. Dolphins in Australia put sponges on their noses to protect their faces while foraging for food. Mothers teach this skill to calves, making sure the knowledge passes through generations.This is an example of cultural learning. At some point in the past, a dolphin learned to use a sponge, then shared the knowledge with the rest of the group. It has only ever been observed in one pod, which suggests these dolphins want to keep the knowledge to themselves.Tool use has also been observed in other mammals, including bears, honey badgers, pigs and otters.

Tool use in birds

Alongside mammals, the animal kingdom’s most prolific tool-users are birds. The New Caledonian crow is a striking example, which outperforms chimps in most logical tests.These birds craft tools out of leaves and sticks, carefully fashioning them into useful shapes. They invent new tools to combat novel problems, like a hook-shaped tool to reach an insect nest hidden down an awkward bend.In laboratory tests, crows have also demonstrated meta-tool use: using one tool, to obtain a second tool, which then helps them to reach some food. Problem solving using two different tools in two different steps suggests a high capacity for logical reasoning, which few other species are capable of.Tool use has also been observed in other birds, including parrots, herons, finches and Egyptian vultures.

Fish and cephalopods

In recent years, the logical intelligence of octopuses has gained a lot of attention. Wild individuals have been seen collecting coconut shells, and wielding them like shields, or pieces of armor.An octopus hiding in a shellAt an aquarium in Germany, Otto the octopus learned to throw stones at the sides of his tank, in an effort to break the glass. He also sprayed water to short-circuit a lamp, probably because he did not like the glare.Some species of fish can also use tools, like the wrasses who use rocks to open clams. Stingrays adjust the shape of their bodies to redirect currents, using the flow of water to extract hard-to-reach pieces of food.

Insects and reptiles

Tool use has rarely been observed in reptiles, which do not excel when it comes to logical intelligence. But in 2007, one notable exception was observed in India.A crocodile will hold a pile of twigs at the end of its nose, then lie motionless beneath the water. When a bird tries to collect the sticks, the crocodile attacks. The crocodiles only use this technique during nesting season, when birds are on the lookout for sticks.Tool use is common in insects. Ants use stones to block the tunnels of rival colonies, while bumblebees in a laboratory test learned to roll a ball to a specific location in order to receive a treat.

Instinct vs. insight

Some scientists argue that tool use in other species is not a true indication of logical intelligence. The debate comes down to two interpretations: instinct versus insight.Instinctive tool use is an automatic behavior that a species evolves over millions of years. Crocodiles, for example, do not actively decide to set a trap for birds. This is an innate behavior, which they perform automatically. It does not involve any creative, logical thought.Insightful tool use is when an animal encounters a brand new problem and comes up with a tool to overcome it. Birds, primates, and octopuses have demonstrated insightful tool use. Their creativity and flexibility is a sign of logical intelligence.

Animal numeracy

Alongside problem solving and tool use, another sign of logical intelligence is the ability to handle numbers.Some shoaling fish can count and compare numbers. When they see two shoals, they will usually join the larger one; there is an evolutionary benefit to comparing the numbers, and joining a stronger group.In captivity, a parrot named Alex was taught to count, and to perform some basic sums. This suggests that his brain was capable of math, although he never would have evolved these skills in the wild.

A subject of debate, in academic circles, is whether or not two individuals within a single species can be born with different levels of intelligence.For example, while Alex the parrot learned basic math, other parrots of the same species have shown no signs of learning. Some chimps use sticks to fish for termites, while others never learn this skill, even with extensive training.

Do animals feel emotions?

The first scientist to study animal emotions in a laboratory setting was Jaak Panksepp, a psychobiologist working in the 1970s. Through experiments with rats, he identified seven emotional states, including rage, fear and play.Panksepp believed that these emotional states were hereditary rather than learned. For example, a rat would show signs of fear when it smelled a cat hair, even if that rat had never encountered a cat before. In other words, these animals were born with a pre-set range of emotions.

When he tickled rats, they emitted high-frequency chirps, at a similar pitch to sounds they made when they were excited by pieces of food. Panksepp concluded that these excitable chirps were animal laughter. The rats enjoyed being tickled, and always came back for more.

When social animals, like crows or elephants, find a dead individual, they often gather around it, and stand there silently, as though they are holding some kind of funeral. It is hard to be sure if grief is involved, but at the very least, these animals appear to hold an understanding of death.In the 1970s, a young chimp named Flint stopped eating and socializing when his mother, Flo, passed away. In the end, he died of starvation. Again, it is hard to know what happened in his brain, but his behavior certainly looked like grief.

[ratgrrrlgames]

Hierarchies of Circles

This is a collection of anarchist 12-word RPGs for the Anarchy in the Tabletop, 12-Word RPG, and Forever Open Source Jams.

don’t know anything about art or design and I only know a little bit about anarchism. I most closely align with anarchist communism, but as a queer chronically disabled and neurodivergent non binary trans womxn, I have a lot of frustration with ‘purist’, anti-voting, accelerationist bullshit that wants anarchism on a mountain of marginalised corpses.

We need to live to be able to fight

Love, support and solidarity

- RATGRRRL

I am Queer in every sense.

I don't make things for bigots.

Hierarchies of circles is released under a Creative Comrades License.

Artwork and assets are Attribution 4.0 International , Creative Comrades or public domain Licenses

I can't stop bigots using my fucking Queer shit, but they are absolutely not welcome to it and I will call them the fuck out.

Marginalized folx or anyone who can't afford to pay for whatever reason, please pick this up for free!

Thanks to 

Strega Wolf van den Berg (Inspiration and art)

Sergei Nechayev by Pavlov's House (Directly inspiring some of the games and being a perfect soundtrack for this)

Much That is Good and All That is Evil by Jeeyon Shim (Directly Inspiring one of the games)

[academicelephant]

Things I learned in high school psychology and still remember

Schemas and scripts

Representation

Neisser’s perceptual cycle

Cocktail party effect

Dual process theory

Habituation

Plasticity of the brain

What neurons are and how they function

...also some other stuff about the brain, like where the cerebral cortex, amygdala, callosal commissure, medulla and cerebellum are and what they do

The structure and function of memory (like working memory, episodic memory, etc.)

Reasons why sleep is needed

Freud's psychodynamic view of the human mind (iceberg model)

Pavlov’s dog experiments (classical conditioning on animals)

Little Albert experiment (classical conditioning on humans)

Bandura’s Bobo doll experiment (social learning theory)

Robbers cave experiment (realistic conflict theory)

Milgram experiment (obedience to authority figures)

Asch conformity experiment

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation

Deep and shallow learning methods

Assimilation and accomodation

Metacognition

Self-efficacy

Defensive attribution bias

Basic emotions

Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory

Vygotzky’s Zone of proximal development (circle chart, you know the one with ‘person’ in the center, ‘zone of proximal development’ around that and ‘things you can’t do yet’ on the outer circle)

Differences in the thinking of an expert and a novice

Theory of mind (Sally-Anne test)

Object permanence

Attachment theory

Attribution theory

Freud’s 5 stages of psychosexual development

Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development

Marcia’s identity status theory

McAdam’s model of personality

Big five personality traits

Binet‘s IQ test (to identify children with learning difficulties)

Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences

I left out those theories and terms I recognize but cannot explain (such as Vaillant’s defense mechanisms, Ayalon’s coping mechanisms, Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological systems theory or Piaget’s theory of cognitive development). I also didn’t include terms related to research methods or mental disorders although I do know them.

Anyway, the amount of things I still remember tells about 1) my motivation, 2) my studying skills, 3) my teacher’s teaching skills and 4) the quality of my textbooks. I’d say they were all at a high level. Of course, also the fact that psychology is my minor and therefore I have studied these same things in university courses has an effect on my remembering!

[blubfishblue]

[willthewise7]

Marketing Analysis of Byler

Marketing Concepts and Theory

Before I begin analysing the actual marketing content used by Netflix and Stranger Things for Byler, I’d like to mention some basic marketing concepts and theory which are used.

One of the main techniques used by marketers is Classical Conditioning, a theory originally conceptualised by Pavlov. In brief, this theory states that you can increase attention and understanding to whatever you are marketing by using associations. For example; McDonald’s use branding such as their Golden Arches and logo. When a consumer sees this logo you immediately think of McDonald’s right? You may also think of burgers, fries and just food in general. But then comes the hunger associated with just simply seeing this logo, your brain associates it with pleasure and hunger. So marketers can use key associations to help consumers understand their products through emotional connections and psychological connections. This helps to not only formulate better understanding but also to increase attention and awareness. If people don’t understand your products or have no connection, usually they won’t use your service or buy your products.

So before I begin analysing marketing conducted for Stranger Things, I just want to put the above into context. It’s clear that the Duffer Brothers have planned this story out and they have already now told Netflix executives the ending of season 5. With this in mind, they would inform Netflix and social media administrators as to which content they should produce. Note, however, that they would not tell them the plot as this could lead to unwanted leaks. They can push for certain content to be produced though, which I believe is happening.

Stranger Things and Netflix accounts therefore would publish certain content to hint to the audience as to what is happening next. Taking Classical Conditioning and psychological connections into account, they would post Byler related content to help the general audience to gain a further understanding of the potential for Byler. Over time, using a reinforcement strategy in marketing has shown to increase positive reception and connotations amongst consumers. By feeding Byler content over time, this allows them to soften the potential for a backlash and so the general audience simply cannot say that it “came out of nowhere”.

Analysis of Marketing Content

To start let’s look at some of the content that was released pre-season 3.

As you can see above this photoshoot was conducted pre-season 3. What is interesting is the couple choices above. You have Jopper, Lumax and Jancy which are all likely to be endgame couples. It’s important to note they were important pairings to each other in season 3 too. What’s interesting is Mike and Will doing a couple shoot? If that’s not intentional marketing then someone needs to be fired, because that is obvious. To me it looks like they are subtly promoting Byler as an endgame couple. Additionally, Millie was apparently available at the time, yet they still chose Byler. Those who use surface level analysis will, of course, not notice but this is not the only material promoted.

Next we have an interesting excerpt from the SFX section of a magazine for season 3. You can see it reads “boy trouble”. Interestingly, they decided to use boy trouble instead of girl trouble to summarise Mikes story arc in season 3. Foreshadowing perhaps? Clever marketing again it seems. You may say it’s a stretch but “everything is intentional”. In marketing I can assure you, you are told all of the small details to include by the creators or hierarchy. These promotions take a lot of work.

Moving on to the next piece, this is from the game Puzzle Tales (Chapter 7).

Interestingly, this part of the game was seemingly from Wills perspective and Mike is referred to as being “boyfriend material”. “Flayed boyfriend” is also used for Mike. Again this is a piece of internal marketing used inside the game to condition people to assume the possibility of Byler being a thing. You may say, do people really pick up on this? Some do, yes. Do lots of others? No, not explicitly, but perhaps subconsciously. You see, marketing is all about subconscious influence. Even if you think something has not influenced you in any way, it’s likely to have had an impact. Whilst you may think Byler will be unpopular, many will come round to the idea because of the marketing used, alongside of course clever onscreen subtext and Easter eggs.

Lastly, some more recent promotions that have really hinted at Byler.

I mean just read the caption, it speaks volumes. But the fact they are really trying to get the message across of Will being a third wheel and there being a love triangle involved, is obvious. Alongside the subtext, they are using marketing content like this to demonstrate further to the audience that something is happening here and it needs to be noticed. Ambiguous captions draw people in and get conversations started, allowing people to work it out for themselves. This allows people to start getting adjusted to the idea, especially if they have no clue about it.

This next promotion post I love because it’s subtle yet, so obvious at the same time. Just to clarify, they aren’t saying that they prefer season 3 compared to 4 in the caption. The arrow is used to show that in both seasons they are having a fight and the scenes are paralleled. Clever, using marketing to show subtext in the show for those who missed it. They are trying to illustrate to the audience that these fights are very significant and are closely associated with Byler. Both fights were based around their relationship and how distant Mike is making himself due to his relationship with El. We are being told that this relationship is causing problems not just to Mike and El, but to his friends and best friends too, but mainly Will.

Mike deflects his emotions onto Will in both of these scenes. In season 3 he says “it’s not my fault you don’t like girls” and “what did you think, really, that we were never going to get girlfriends”. This sounds like he’s deflecting his own issues and making them Wills fault and projecting himself onto Will. The girlfriends line is used in association with growing up as that was, in the 80s, seen as the “normal” thing to do. But being aware of that Mike simply knows it’s not true, so he projects. Same with season 4. He says Will is “being a douche” and that maybe he should’ve “reached out more”. Mike is scared of his feelings and so he projects them, making it seem like Will is the problem. He creates distance so he doesen’t have to face the truth. So paralleling this and using it in marketing is clever as it’s reiterating what the show wants you to see and understand, conditioning you to make these associations and realise what’s happening.

This last post I wanted to use because not only do I find this funny, it’s one of the most blatantly obvious pieces of marketing. Actors are sometimes informed by either the writers, producers or anyone with that power to hint at certain plot-lines or to make certain social media posts. By doing so, it creates hype and gives the audience an insight into the direction of the show moving forwards. This post shows Noah hinting at volume 2 having even more Byler content and that volume 1 made him ship Byler over all of the other ships. The Netflix reply, however, is pure gold dust, “Will deserves to receive the same love he gives”. They emphasise the caption with hand claps in between each word. They want you to realise that just having Will love Mike wouldn’t be a worthy story and that he deserves more than it just being a one sided crush. Reciprocation is deserved, and is highlighted with this piece of marketing.

Before anyone says that you should take Netflix Geeked posts with a pinch of salt, I do believe that they are told to hype up certain content on purpose. Whilst you can argue maybe they just have that opinion for the reply, it’s more of the fact that they are fuelling the hype that speaks volumes, not the caption itself. They didn’t have to comment at all, yet they have been told they need to hype up Byler. This is because they need to condition the audience to the idea of it happening. That way, people can slowly adjust and accept it.

Overall, I would’ve analysed more but I ran out of photo space. I picked out the most interesting marketing material that I believe hints strongly at Byler. Many are worried about queer baiting due to past experience, I totally get that. I do agree that if Byler is one-sided, then it is queer baiting. However, I don’t think Byler is queer bait. The way that all of the cast, crew and social media admins go to great lengths to emphasise Byler, that’s not a coincidence or hype scheme. They use great subtext and marketing alongside, to slowly introduce the idea of Byler, so that the general audience is not shocked and give it a negative reception. Another reason as to why it’s a slow burn. Although the Duffers did recently state that they are writing the story “that feels right” and are not giving into “the noise”. I think that just demonstrates, alongside this post, that this is not queer bait. This is different to before. Everything that is happening is intentional, we are meant to notice. Start believing, not dreaming!

[bbeelzemon]

maslows hierarchy of needs but its just these three things

[cina-full-moon-xanadium]

with the pavlov hierarchy of needs for demons being curry, when is lovekov getting a high chair to eat it

lovekov doesnt need it bc she is so much stronger than kagerou and vice

[howwelldoyouknowyourmoon]

‘Ashamed to be Korean' extract — the Moon scam is paid for in blood, poverty, misery, sickness and death by a slave class of Japanese

September 30, 2012 This has been incredibly hard to do, but I have decided to sacrifice my national pride, personal interest and loyalties to start telling the truth about the complicated religious scams of the Moons and the so-called “Unification Movement”.

Why? Because I guess I discovered that I still had some conscience left alive somewhere inside of me, so I decided to come out and tell the truth, and before it shrivels up totally. Another reason for me to come out is the tragic and shameful truth that the Moon scam is paid for in blood, poverty, misery, sickness and death by a slave class of Japanese who have been, and continue to be, what must be the most hapless class of religious scam victims in history. This is worsened by the fact that the victims have been deliberately and cynically scammed by a group from another country.

I have no love or respect for the Japanese, and like most Koreans, I have rarely missed an opportunity to gloat at any Japanese misfortune with other Koreans but I guess I have to draw the line somewhere.

It is my intention to tell the truth about the Moons and the Korean feudal ‘aristocracy’ from the position of an insider in the hope that those members who still have enough of a vestigial conscience left functioning in themselves can know the unvarnished truth and fully understand the crimes that have been, and are still being, committed and either help stop the crimes from being committed, or at least walk away and not contribute even silently to these crimes. … It has been said that one of the problems with the Moon Church is that every country projects their own image of what they want the “Messiah” to be; The Japanese see an emperor to grovel to and worship, westerners saw Moon as the the second coming of Jesus, while for the Koreans a conquering King that will elevate Koreans above all other nations (you might as well know we think we are superior to the rest of the world physically, spiritually, intellectually, and culturally). Therein the problem starts, Moon’s genius was to able to manipulate facts and myths and lies to divide and conquer and get exactly what he wanted for him and his family and for Korea which has created the core culture and operating practice of the movement: Deception.

Some people may think that the Divine Principle is the religious doctrine of the ‘church’, but it is nothing more than a recruiting tool. The real ‘religion’ is like an onion, with separate layers of rules, requirements and benefits. The easiest way to understand the game is to realize that Moon wanted to set him and his family as a royal family governing as a theocracy from day one. His goal was to control all power, money, laws and rules, at least as much as he could get hold of.

The theocracy works by strict hierarchy with the Moons as the top royals, the Korean blood relatives as the minor royals, the rest of the Koreans as the aristocracy and top officials. The rest of the nations are all in the position of servants. The only absolute in the Moon church is the position of the Moons and the loyalty demanded from the members.

Have you wondered why all top posts involving power and money are controlled by Koreans?

Do not be fooled by the fact that we trust the Japanese more than our own and use then nominally to hold assets and the like – that is only because they are totally obedient.

What Moon and his family fear the most is meritocracy, God forbid if there was a level playing field, the whole game would be blown sky high. It is fantastic for us though, to have rules applied not only in a selective way but completely differently to always ensure the Moons and ourselves are on top.

My greatest personal amazement is how supposedly educated people in advanced countries have bought the enslaving myths of Moon that have in fact been precisely tailored for them without them realizing the utter insanity and nonsense of coexistence of completely contradicting realities and myths and rules, without even acknowledging the irony of it all! Maybe we are much cleverer than you.

The Japanese have bought the fantasy of ‘Eve Nation’, when in reality there never was and still is absolutely no intention to use them for any purpose other than for donations and slave labor. If and when they are no longer needed they will be dropped like a dirty habit in favor of another country (if one was available), this threat has been constantly drummed in to their heads to keep them desperate and obedient.

What they do not realize is that in private Sun Myung Moon, when he was alive, Hak Ja Han and all the Moon children and we 2nd gens in the inner circle not only have no respect for Japan and instead gloat at the way in which Korea has been taking over Japanese business, laugh at the Japanese members and refer to them in really raw, rude ways. We see it as a rightful revenge for what we think they did to us. On the other hand, we never fail to remind them of the indemnity they need to pay to us.

I have heard Japanese old members emotionally talk about how they will accept anything because they had felt loved by “Aboji” at some time. When they say this, they remind me of rabbits caught in the headlights, totally bamboozled by the Korean charismatic gift for delivering shameless emotional appeals at 1000 horsepower. The reason they were taken in is because they had only ever experienced emotion in Japan at 100 horsepower before meeting Moon, so they are convinced that 1000 horsepower emoting must be the real thing.

Given the Japanese unfortunate penchant for masochism, perhaps it is not surprising that they have been fooled, but I am truly amazed that more Westerners have not been able to see through this scam.

My jaw drops as members still refer to the Moons as “True”, as an unending string of evidence of their unbridled wickedness and hypocrisy appears on this and other sites, it makes me giggle involuntarily, as I watch Westerners falling over themselves to justify or deny their crimes contorting themselves to deny the truth.

My only explanation for it is commitment bias, nobody wants to admit they have been fooled. Please read the facts honestly and use your conscience to decide what to do. Remember the laws of physics and math, the laws of countries and most importantly of all the laws of morals and values either apply equally and universally or not at all.

Members have been trained like Pavlov’s dogs to do our (more accurately the Moons’) dirty work for us. Foreign members justify our crimes with that precise get-out-of-jail-free card that the whole Moon scam relies on.

Read more here: https://tragedyofthesixmarys.com/ashamed-to-be-korean/

___________________________________________

In 1965 Japan gave $800 million as reparations for their occupation of Korea

The Japanese government supported Korea with $800 million in 1965, $400m in 1983 and over $10 billion in 1997.

Sun Myung Moon Church used the Japanese members for profit, not religious purposes – the world’s greediest church

Suicide of Japanese ‘Moon money mule’ in Uruguay. Mother of three children

A huge Moon Church scam in Japan is revealed

Shocking video of UC of Japan demanding money – English transcript

Moon extracted $500 million from Japanese female members

Japanese woman recruited by the Unification Church and sold to an older Korean farmer

How Sun Myung Moon bought protection in Japan

The ‘True Father’ who could not forgive. Sun Myung Moon: “I haven’t been able to release my grudge towards Japanese people yet.” November 2011

[childology]

Famous Psychologists & Theories:

Ainsworth, Mary - Attachment Theory

Asch, Solomon - Conformity Experiment

Bandura, Albert - Social Learning Theory

Bowlby, John - Attachment Theory

Bruner, Jerome - cognitive development of children

Erikson, Erik - Theory of Psychosocial Development

Freud, Sigmund - psychoanalysis

Kohlberg, Lawrence - moral development

Kolb, David - experiential learning styles theory

Kuhn, Thomas Samuel – developmental psychology

Maslow, Abraham - Hierarchy of Needs

Milgram, Stanley – obedience experiment

Pavlov, Ivan – conditioned/unconditioned response

Piaget, Jean – cognitive development

Popper, Karl - distinguishing science from non-science

Rogers, Carl - self actualization

Skinner, B. F. - operant conditioning

Thorndike, Edward - operant conditioning within behaviorism

Vygotsky, Lev – sociocultural theory

Watson, John – classical conditioning within behaviourism

Wundt, Wilhelm – structuralism, founder of experimental psychology

Zimbardo, Philip - Stanford Prison Experiment

[biostudyblog]

Key Psychologists

 Wilhelm Wundt Commonly referred to as the father of psychology. He set up the first laboratory exclusive to studying human psychology- he studied structuralism

G. Stanley Hall Established the first psychology laboratory in the USA

William James Published the first real psychology textbook called The Principles of Psychology. He studied functionalism, where he tried to identify how the structures Wundt found functioned.

Mary Whiton Calkins She was one of the 2 early influences on Psychology. She specialised in memory and was the first female president of the APA. She was refused the PhD she rightfully earned from Harvard due to her sex.

Margaret Floy Washburn The other of the 2 early female psychologists on psychology. She was the first woman to earn a PhD in psychology, shortly after Calkins was refused hers.

Max Wertheimer One of the 3 founders of gestalt psychology which examines psychological phenomena as structural wholes, rather than breaking them down into their components

Sigmund Freud Founded psychoanalysis, which sought to understand the influences of the unconscious mind on human thought and behaviour

John B Watson Performed the “Little Albert” experiment, tracking how conditioning can affect our perceptions of our environment. Widely criticised due to the trauma he caused the child

Ivan Pavlov Performed experiments with a dog, founded conditioning and the field of behaviourism

Abraham Maslow Humanist psychologist most well known for creating the Hierarchy of Needs

Carl Rogers Among the founders of humanistic psychology and human-centred therapy

Charles Darwin Biologist who created the theory of evolution and natural selection

Jean Piaget Cognitive psychologist who observed the cognitive development of children 

[theheartofateacher]

PROPONENTS AND THEIR THEORIES

1. WILHELM WUNDT-father of modern psychology

2.SIGMUND FREUD-father of psychoanalysis, and psychosexual theory

3.JOHANN HEINRICH-father of education and pedagogy

4. IVAN PAVLOV-classical conditioning

5.BURRHUS F. SKINNER-operant conditioning.

6.DAVID AUSUBEL-meaningful learning

7.JEROME BRUNER-discovery learning,spiral curriculum

8.ALBERT BANDURA-social cognitive learning theory.

9.EDWARD LEE THORNDIKE-law of readiness and exercises

10. KURT LEVIN-life space content.

11.KOHLER-problem solving by insight, insightful learning

12.URIE BROFENBRENNER-ecolog­ical theory

13.SANDRA BEM-gender schema theory

14.HOWARD GARDNER-theory of multiple intelligence

15.ELLIOT TURRIEL-Social domain theory

16.LAWRENCE KOHLBERG-moral development theory

17.ROBERT STERNBERG-triathlon theory intelligence

18.ERIK ERIKSON-psychosocial­ development theory

19.MA. MONTESSORI-transfer of learning, kindergarten preparation of children.

20.EDWARD PAUL TORRANCE-creative problem solving

21.CHOMSKY-linguistic acquisition theory

22.JEAN PIAGET-cognitive learning theory

23.JOHN WATSON-behavioral theory

24.EDWARD TOLMAN-purpose behaviorism

25.BERNARD WEINER-attribution theory

26.DANIEL GOLEMAN-emotional intelligence.

27.TITCHENER- structuralism psychology

28.ROBERT GAGNE -sequence of instruction

29.ABRAHAM MASLOW - hierarchy of needs , motivation theory

30.BENJAMIN BLOOM - bloom's cognitive taxonomy

31.DAVID KRATHWOHL - affective domain

32.LEV VYGOTSKY - socio-cultural theory of cognitive devt , linguistic theory, Scaffolding

33.JOHN LOCKE - tabularasa , empiricism

34.CHARLES COOLEY - looking glass self-theory

35.JOHN FLAVEL - metacognition

36.ARNOLD GESELL - maturation theory

37.JOHN DEWEY - Learning by doing

38.DAVID FROEBEL - Father of kindergarten

39.AUGUSTE COMTE - Father of Sociology.

40.JOHN AMOS COMENCIUS - Fr. of modern education.

[bmebookmyessay]

Learn About the Major Models of Consumer Behaviour

Consumer Behaviour is a major study that describes how customers make decisions in the marketplace for purchasing different products and services. When it comes to marketing the consumer behaviour is one crucial element that is used for developing various strategies. The students studying in the marketing field must learn about consumer behaviour. If you have any doubts regarding this topic then you can hire Help with Consumer Behaviour Assignment Online from the experts of BookMyEssay. However, today we would introduce you to important consumer behaviour models. In order to understand the effects of consumer behaviour on marketing, it is important for its factors. 

Factors That Influence Consumer Behaviour

Psychological Factors: The consumers have their own unique thought process. When we talk about the psychological factors it includes perception, motivation, and beliefs of the consumer. Marketers must pay close attention to these psychological factors.

Personal Factors: The personal factors influence the buying decision on the basis of economic condition, age, and occupation. This is about the habits, interests, opinions of that consumer. These factors are considered the most influential thing in consumer behaviour.

Social Factors: These are the factors that are driven according to the social environment, family, communities, group, etc. The purchasing power of the consumers also gets influenced by the behaviour by social factors in the marketplace. 

List of Popular Consumer Behaviour Models

Economic model: The economic model of consumer behaviour defines the rise in the utility from the products that are based on the law of diminishing marginal utility. The core derivation of this model is that it focuses on the desire of the consumers to gain the maximum profit by spending the minimum amount on the product. This model is based on three important effects:

· Income effects

· Substitution effects

·  Price effects

Psychological Model: This model is based on Maslow’s theory of Hierarchy of needs. This is the model of consumer behaviour that divides their requirements into the psychological, social, ego, and self-actualization needs. This model states that consumer behaviour often gets influenced by the needs of consumers. You can take homework help online to learn more about it.

Sociological Models: This is another important consumer behaviour model. The sociological models are highly based on society and other dominating groups. The primary groups are consist of friends, family, relatives, and family members etc. The secondary groups consist of other members of society. The lifestyle and other related requirements are important factors under this model.

Pavlovian Model:

This model is named after the famous psychologist, Ivan Pavlov. He conducted several experiments to evaluate consumer behaviour in the market place. This model is entirely