#a theory

[sapphire600]

It would be funny in season 2, we see Tyler all Hannibal Lecter style, him inside a jail cell for dangerous monsters.

Wednesday will visit him to ask for information and if he noticed anyone looking/stalking him. However, Tyler will just be like: Hi, Wednesday so how you been? 😉

It would be really interesting if the writers toy with him, you know? Like: Is he really going to help or he got something up his sleeves?

Because as the viewers and everyone else, we know we can’t trust Tyler just yet.

And if he actually have to help Wednesday to catch her stalker. It would be extra cool to see everyone reaction.

Wednesday: Clam down. I have everything under control.

Enid: Clam down?! Did you forget he try to kill us?!

Eugene: And actually succeeding.

Tyler: I mean, you’re alive aren’t you? (Everyone looks at him) sorry

Plus, while on the investigation, we get a scene where it just him and Wednesday talking about either or not anything they share were true or not. (So much potential!)

[bridgerton-bard]

Polin Angst Thoughts

Warning: Spoilers (Romancing Mister Bridgerton, Netflix Season 2)

I have been seeing the online discourse about how much angst people think should be included in the Polin storyline of season three, and I thought I would add my two cents.

Personally, I am a little excited to see the power dynamic in the relationship shift in Penelope's favor. She has spent years pining after this man who has never seriously entertained the idea that she would make a good partner. Maybe she should have moved on when it was clear that Colin didn't reciprocate her romantic feelings, but then we'd never have the Polin story.

I'm not saying I want Colin to suffer for the sake of suffering, but I do think some angst from him is going to be required, because he so thoroughly dismissed the idea of courting Penelope in season two. In real life, if someone dismissed Penelope (or anyone else) in this way, they would need to earn their way back into her heart, to prove that their affections were not part of a cruel joke. It would be unrealistic for Colin to dismiss Penelope as a prospect for courting in such a resounding, public fashion at the end of season two, and then win her back by simply saying "I missed you" at the start of the next social season less than a year later.

Even considering the social mores of the regency time period, I think Penelope unequivocally accepting Colin's "I missed you" as an apology and beginning to court Colin would be unrealistic. Julia Quinn stresses in several of the Bridgerton books that women in the regency period generally had little power in the courting process. Women had to wait for gentlemen to be introduced to them (never introducing themselves to gentlemen they were interested in), women had to accept offers from any man to dance unless their dance card was already full or they were betrothed, etc. In most of the courting process, regency women had to be passive and wait for their desired suitor to approach and court them. Accepting or not accepting offers to court and marriage proposals were the two significant points in the courting process where regency women actually held the upper hand in the dynamics. Penelope making it clear to Colin that she will not court him is simply her exercising what little power she does have in the social mores of the time.

I think one thing that gets glossed over about Colin's behavior towards Penelope in seasons one and two is that it is also the behavior of a rake, but in a different way than Anthony or Benedict's rake behavior. Anthony and Benedict's bachelor periods tend to show them both as rakes because they kept mistresses, visited brothels, or had a parade of women engaged in some sort of fling. Colin's behavior in seasons one and two is rake behavior because it should be clear to everyone, including Colin, that he is leading Penelope on. Without any intention to court her, Colin is impeding Penelope from moving on and finding a suitor who requites her feelings. This does get a little complicated because in the books, it is Violet Bridgerton who is encouraging Colin to dance with Penelope, and Penelope is aware of this or at least suspects it. However, I still argue that just because Colin is not in possession of a parade of flings, it doesn't counteract that some of his behavior towards Penelope is befitting of a rake.

So yes, I do think it's important that we see Colin fight a little for Penelope's affections. It's important for him to realize what he had once she's gone, and that she's worthy of more than always being the backup on call for when he's lonely or feeling misunderstood. I would like to see Colin realize his feelings for Penelope before another suitor proposes to Penelope. Otherwise, I think we get into territory where it just feels like he wants her because he can't have her.

[nocakesformissedith]

What the HELL is this @Ezra Fitz?????? Your coward ass is always hiding behind Marlene interviews. You are a SPINELESS LOSER. You're still A and that's FINAL. There is just WAY too many instances of you BLATANLY telling us. You are a DISGUSTING person for this btw.

[deepestblizzardcomputer]

So, I Have been thinking. . .

Spoilers below

.

.

.

.

about this dude right here.

and why did he actually acted the way he did.

at first you would think this Miles is all evil cause of how cold he acts toward Miles's needing of help like he didn't 'care' but what if there was more behind his action? and even if he was evil as it seems what would be his motive, like what would he really benfit?

So, as it hinted in the first spider-verse movie, the comics that flips it pages actually shows you hints of how things would play out in the scenes.

The first page isn't clear who is speaking, it could be earth 42' Miles to Miles or Uncle Aaron, but the next one shows it our Miles answering to whatever Uncle Aron told him.

Am guessing it has to do something with killing a guy? But why is that you ask?

Simple, revenge. He still didn't kill the guy who killedchis brother. that's why he responded to Miles being meaning he was NOT a good person because his wound for his brother was still fresh and all he wanted was to HURT (or how it seemed for me) and as we see here,

it is now clear that 42' Miles is the one saying this to Miles, "you and I are going to take care of a bad guy. a real bad guy"

He wants his help, that's why he didn't want to let go off him just yet, with his abilities as 'spider-man' he would do them a lot of help much faster. if I am right, he wants Miles to help him take down his father's killer, by killing him, himself.

and of course, Miles would refuse for two reasons. one, our Miles's father's issue still unsolved and he would fear to be too late to save his father and two, he wouldn't let his other self do that. it was just wrong.

Which brings us to what these two would be disccusing in the next movie. Miles here asking genuinely what happened to this Miles to make him the way he is.

And am sure that will bring up a backstory of why he was doing this in first place. which will make Miles show his Empathy toward him saying he went through the same grief when he lost his uncle in his universe.

am guessing here 42' Miles would be curious of what did this Miles did when he knew and saw the murderer of his uncle to which Miles responded. (As i guess) that he ran away. (Which technically happened) as 42' Miles would respond with.

I am not sure if the one who killed Uncle Aaron would be the same person who murdered 42' Miles father but if that was the case, sheesh.

That would explain why this panel is here BEFORE the "you ran away?!" One

It could be the flashback of 1610' Miles.

42'Miles and uncle Aaron would possibly be confused of why didn't this Miles just kill the man since he had the chance since he was more powerful with his spider powers. to which again, Miles would probably responded with something along those lines, that real good people don't do that, it was wrong and he was just a kid.

How could he be able to murder somone that easily? he was sure the other Miles wouldn't be capable of such thing as well. (Maybe) he still had a caring heart and he wasn't completely evil.

(Which encourages the '42 Miles being Vigilante' theory)

If you look closely, there is an apparent saddnes in his eyes. a boy who lost alot of things. it might have been subtle but 42's Miles was actually relieved when he knew his father was alive somewhere.

But so why would he coldly dismiss Miles's help like that?

" If I don't get out, our dad is going to die—"

" your dad. "

he is actually distancing himself from hope. that out there somewhere, his father is safe and well. He doesn't want to feel this 'hope' even when he was relieved of that fact. He still wanted to keep those anguish feeling inside, to push him forward toward his revenge.

If 42' Miles let himself relax he might let his focus and motive slip out of his main target and he didn't want that.

My theory here, is they might get their epic fight but in some point they could reach to an understanding and help eachother in the end.

Again, if that the murderer who kill 42' Miles father, there could be a chance that they would find another collider in this universe, who knows?

Also, I have a feeling this 42's Earth doesn't have a spider-man but am going to get to that in the next post.

Also! Other panels that i am not sure where they actually are connected: (one of them could be Uncle Aaron speaking with 42's Miles thougj)

[respectthepetty]

I have thoughts about Midnight Museum's seventh episode, like The One isn't bad, Boon is immortal (how did he curse himself?), and Chan knows CPR and wears a baseball hat in the past, but I'm just going to leave this one thought right here -

The One wasn't just talking about Khatha.

The One needs the group at their best for what's coming.

Because when Chan is resurrected, I doubt he'll be as kind to humanity as he was last time, and only one other person can match his ability.

They need a warrior's strength, a seer's eyes, and an oracle's voice to deliver the savior.

[mashand]

Another legend. We will miss you. But just like the saying,ITS JUST A THEORY A GAME THEORY thanks for everything.

[aisy15-chan]

i have a TADC headcanon/theory (⁠´⁠ ⁠.⁠ ⁠.̫⁠ ⁠.⁠ ⁠`👉👈⁠)

I have a theory/headcanon that before logging in to tadc, they/victims will create their own mascot/avatar game, so it's like when you first play a multi-player game and create your own avatar and then finally log in.

But when they use the VR headset and get stuck being the avatar they created with thier own mind & consciousness.

I mean idk if this true or not but this can explains a lot of things—

[sapphire600]

Something I just realized, so in Wednesday (2022) final episode we find out that someone was stalking Wednesday.

The two photos the stalker showed her is one with Tyler in the coffee shop and one with Xavier in Nevermore, why? Out of everybody that Wednesday knows like Enid and Eugene (both people that Wednesday really cares about), the stalker shows the love interests instead to Wednesday, why? Is it a way of saying “you have to choose one of them”?

I want to immediately rule out, that Tyler can’t be the villain or is going to work with them. Yes, Tyler has every reason to go after Wednesday, but why would Tyler take a picture of him and Wednesday and send it to her? He doesn’t even know she has a phone. ( My theory about Tyler in season two that he did successfully escape but got recaptured and Tyler is sent to a place where dangerous monsters go to. Wednesday is going to ask Tyler if he knows anything about the picture but I think he is going to be shock as her or he actually did notice someone looking suspicious but thought it was Marilyn Thornhill )

I also want to rule out that it can’t be Xavier, yes he gave her the phone as a gift but why would he threatened Wednesday? Yes, she falsely accused him of murder but he did help her at the end of the battle.

So, the stalker has to be someone who knows Wednesday personally, knows she was at Nevermore, knows she has somewhat romantic connection to Tyler and Xavier. And I think I know who it is, Xavier’s Dad, Vincent Thorpe.

Okay, okay I know it sounds crazy and believe me it does but think about, out of everyone parents, we never see him. We knows he has a connection to the Addams Family with them being at Xavier Godmother funeral and him being a celebrity and being powerful. You might be wondering “why Wednesday?” I’m wondering about that to, it could be he wants her power and such and such. But who knows?

I honestly feel like I could be wrong about this and I’m probably am, but it’s a 50/50 chance of this happening.

[sweet-potato-42]

was the spawn waypoint changed so that people dont interrupt the planned lore?

[vizthedatum]

some thoughts/theories on wanting and having an easier life

there shouldn't be any moral judgement for wanting your life to be easy... and then making your life easier.

after all, manifesting (or whatever you want to call it) isn't the same as wishing... it's about embodying the person who can have what you desire.

someone else's embodiment process is probably different than yours

want an easier life? identify what's easy and what's not *for you*, acknowledge the ways your life is already easy, and then do the work in figuring out how to keep having an easier and easier life.

[silversatin2105]

Hey bestie!!!!! So, theory time. I have 2 theories!!

Naoto talks about his partner dying while undercover in Toman and they show a picture in the anime without showing a face and all the details seem to look like Chifuyu in the first bad timeline.

I think Hanma has something to do with time leaping. Maybe he’s a time leaper and Kisaki is the trigger? Do I have much evidence? No. But it seemed odd that it took Kisaki’s death for the futures to get somewhat better. Obviously we (spoiler alert) know a lot of it was also Shinichiro’s fault, but don’t you think one future before that would have been okay?

Thanks 💕

Hey there

i really like the idea of the first theory as it is never really stated what became of Chifuyu in the first time line (mostly because he hadn't been introduced at that point) and if you take into consideration that Chifuyu in most bad timelines worked with multiple people Kazutora included to return Toman to its former state before Kisakis influence it could well enough be argued that Chifuyu could have been some form of undercover cop and as they would say in gang lingo snitches get stitches and as a result it would lead to him being “Taken care of” so to speak, so in my opinion this theory has some credibility to it if you think about it and until properly confirmed it could warrant a deeper discussion down the lines.

Secondly the second theory of Hanma having some kind of link to time leaping kinda makes sense if you take into consideration that Kisaki knew about time leaping too so I want to propose the idea of Hanma being a time leaper and Kisaki being his trigger and when Kisaki died Hanma’s future self gets stuck in the past thus leaving him stranded, this could explain as to why Kisaki knew as time leaper triggers inherit the memories of all their previous selves so to a degree this theory warrents a look in too

But I leave this to the comments section to challenge my stance on these two theories and as stated in my rules go wild with your ideas.

Toman inquisitorial division member Silver

[italic-doing-random-shit]

ANOTHER CHILLED CHONKER

he looks like he slipped lmao

[averagekindergartenfan]

Guys, what if Mara was actually Cara Koskinen in disguised. I mean she could have been taken 2 the hospital afterwards.

[momdusa]

Mattel: makes beautiful Lagoona dolls

Mattel: reboots the dolls

Mattel: puts this on shelves

Us: wtf?

Mattel: omg no one likes Lagoona anymore, we must change her completely

[aethermage1]

Iridikron chatter. And the other two I guess.

Okay so I was chatting with a friend, and something I realized while theorizing that maybe Vyranoth wanted to get access to the nightmare, was that. Iridikron may not be listening to old gods. It may be what the story is leading us to think, but I have a different idea that made both of us pause for a moment. Let’s think about the facts here- the Primalist’s HATE the titans, that’s for sure. So- we have a few hints here and there to Ashzara, to the void, and N’zoth. That’s very true, but here’s the bigger question. Why would Iridikron side with what Deathwing- at the time Neltharion- was siding with? Why at all? Here’s the counterpoint. Iridikron’s secret ally, could actually be the legion, Think on this for a moment, the enemy of my enemy is my friend sort of deal for one, two, Sargeras and the Primalists, have the same overall goal, Iridikron clearly craves power above all else. And Sargeras has resorted to these underhanded tactics, time and time again. You don’t HAVE to corrupt a puppet right away after all. He saw what letting a servant of his see what was going on, brought upon him. It worked out, so much better without corrupting Azshara, so why not repeat the same tactic to a dragon tied to the elements? The other point- Wow likes to make connected villains look. Semi-connected. The horns of his do resemble Sargeras’s. As well as his overall mood, Or I could be totally wrong, but this would be a good bait and switch deal. Sort of a different direction then “it was the void all along” for the 500th time.