I got it- bones but make it t and k centered… think and it think about it👀
Stop it wait … like … Booth & Brennan get called in on a case where there was a dead body found in a theatre or drag club & they have to interview T & K?
Booth would not understand drag at first & Brennan would talk about drag in other cultures, & probably about how it’s been incorporated into events she’s been to in another country but it seems that drag in the US is much different
Sweets would have a fucking field day trying to analyze T & K. His head would spin with all the information he would learn in such a short amount of time, & then he would conclude that they’re in love & that like Booth & Brennan, one of them has to finally make a move
Angela would be absolutely enamored with T & K. She’s been to her fair share of drag shows, but she’s never watched Drag Race because she doesn’t have cable. She’s heard T & K’s names in passing, but didn’t recognize them. And if the victim was a drag queen she would do an initial facial reconstruction of them out of drag, then one of them feminizing their face — then detailing it again later after the ID with their signature hair & makeup
Vincent Nigel-Murray would be the intern in rotation for the case & he would be flustered by the attention T & K gave him. Hodgins would be secretly upset that he wasn’t getting any attention from them & ask Angela why that was
T & K would be obsessed with how chic Cam is, & Cam would accidentally reveal that she watches Drag Race by the end of the case even though she’s been trying to hold it in. And she would ask if she can have Michelle swing by because they started watching it together when Cam got custody of Michelle
K would be SO intrigued by everything at the Jeffersonian. T would be going through it having to confront death & mortality. The wills would definitely come up
That would be really interesting to have two dynamics to work with & have them interact & to find where they mirror each other & where they foil each other
Hmmmm. I definitely have some other T & K writing to get done first, but y’know what Anon … I AM thinking about it now lol
7 notes
·
View notes
I always think a lot of Mickey’s trauma that he buried pretty deep will hit him really really hard post canon.
He’s been in survival mode his whole life so he suppressed a lot of what happened to him just to get through life. He didn’t have the option of dealing with it.
Post canon, things will likely finally slow down for him - less money worries because they have their business, no threat of Terry coming after him, not doing many illegal things so less constant fear of getting caught for something and going back to jail.
So he’ll finally be able to relax a bit and, in his mind, start living and enjoying things in life.
But I think once life slows down, all the trauma from his childhood all the way to adulthood will hit him like a truck. Even things he hasn’t thought about in years will really start affecting him.
And I think he’d get frustrated with himself because he wouldn’t be able to understand why he’s doing so much worse when things are finally good.
But that’s actually why he’s doing so much worse. Because he doesn’t need to constantly prepared for something going wrong, so there’s space for other things in his mind, so everything he’s buried would come right to the surface.
I feel like he’d go through a pretty hard time before he can start to get better because he’ll have to face things he’s suppressed head on, because he won’t be able to bury them any more.
96 notes
·
View notes
There is something so beautifully anvilicious about these quotes;
" I am a bastard too now, just like him. Oh, it would be so sweet, to see him once again. But of course that could never be. Alayne Stone had no brothers, baseborn or otherwise." (AFFC, Alayne II)
"The dream was sweet . . . but Winterfell would never be his to show. It belonged to his brother, the King in the North. He was a Snow, not a Stark. Bastard, oathbreaker, and turncloak . . ." (ASOS, Jon V)
Both Jon and Sansa are yearning for Winterfell and the feelings/memories/family associated -but both are intrinsically restricting themselves based off of their bastard status. The notion of Sansa being the only Stark (and character) to transition from a high-born noble lady to a baseborn bastard cannot be overlooked. (And then of course, the notion of Jon being the only Stark (and character) to transition from baseborn bastard to lord commander, cannot be overlooked.) Jon has risen to the top whilst Sansa has lowered to the bottom.
She (GRRM) makes the comparison to Jon herself, meaning that GRRM makes the comparison himself. this isn't something interpreted by fans - it is right there, explicitly within the text.
Sansa's desire to reunite with Jon is "sweet," it'd be almost like a dream come true. Jon's "dream was sweet" as well. But "Winterfell could never be his" and seeing her brother once again "of course, could never be" (possible).
And then later on in the text, Jon is offered the chance to become Jon Stark, and have Winterfell in name. Thus his decidedly unsubtle desire (that he dismisses as an entirely impossible dream) is fulfilled by Stannis' offer, even though he eventually rejects it in truth "Winterfell belongs to my sister Sansa."
There is also the quote that precedes Jon's "sweet dream," where he fantasises about a beautiful little romance with Ygritte; showing her a flower from the glass gardens, feasting her in the great hall, bathing in the hot pools, and loving beneath the heart tree. This dream is directly connected to Winterfell and is obviously sexually + romantically charged.
So whilst Jon's desire is partially fulfilled (even if he doesn't accept it) can we possibly assume that Sansa's simultaneously unsubtle "that could never be" may also be fulfilled? Since GRRM seems to really be beating us over the head with how 'that could never happen' from Sansa's internal monologue "no one will ever marry me for love" is reiterated multiple times (just you wait sweet one!) and Sansa desiring to reunite with her brother who she has modelled her bastardry after, who is supposedly the only brother left to her, is immediately dismissed by Sansa because she's accepted the fact that she'll never be with her family again, (and that she shall never encounter true love).
The connections only keep connecting!
So to summarise:
Jon & Sansa both have "sweet" dreams/desires that connect to Winterfell/family.
Jon's dream is sexually/romantically charged, involves a red-headed girl, and establishes Jon's suppressed desires as actually romantic.
Both Jon and Sansa are bastards in these contexts.
Both Jon and Sansa woefully dismiss these dreams/desires as impossible as "that could never be" and "it could never be his to show."
Jon's desire however is later offered on a silver platter by Stannis Baratheon, to which he mulls over and states that he "has always wanted it" (to be his). Though he later refuses Stannis' offer on the basis that "Winterfell belongs to Sansa" - twice over he says this.
Jon 'giving' Winterfell to Sansa is in direct contrast to Robb (Sansa's image of an honourably idealistic older brother) flat out rejecting Sansa's claim on the basis of her marriage to Tyrion.
Jon thus establishes himself as the only character who respects and protects Sansa's claim. Who does not abuse or exploit it. (Even though he was given the opportunity for it and it's been his innermost desire since childhood.)
In a way, this further conveys Jon as Sansa's unspoken, subconscious hero who is protecting her interests and instilling all those heroic ideals (such as the Janos Slynt situation) - though she does not realise it and has accepted that "there are no heroes" at all. But Jon is the true hero, hiding in plain sight.
So, whilst Sansa believes there are no heroes, Jon fulfils those ideals. Whilst Sansa believes no one will marry her for love, Jon exists as the embodiment of all the chivalric, romantic ideals that she's so desperately wanted.
Can we now assume that Sansa believing that she will essentially never see Jon again as entirely anvilicious as she will in fact see Jon again?
GEORGE I'M IN YOUR WALLS.
98 notes
·
View notes
Genuinely part of me wants to print Satan's poem out and stick it up somewhere......... he means so much to meeee
What if he called IK 'Paws' as a lil nickname sometimes 🥺
oh that's so dang cute :(((((
feel like i need to start keeping a running tally of all ik's little nicknames (both hypothetical ones that i've only ever used in my head and the ones she gets called in-story)
ooh on a similar note i had this idea about everyone having their own specific little nickname that they use when ik's upset and they're trying to comfort her - the level of sappiness is highly variable, and would you believe me if i told you lucifer's ranks at like number three
(number one is asmo, and number two is diavolo)
13 notes
·
View notes
little late to your recs post but johnnysimmer has amazing unisex hairs!! i know that you are against early access but he only does 2 weeks and releases soooooo much content that it really makes up for it :) all of his cc is very game friendly too!!
Thank you, nonny! 😚 even though it's early access, I still appreciate his cc a lot! I personally think two weeks should be the standard time period for eacc, and the amount of content he releases while still seeming fresh/creative is impressive imo. As an oldie, I also appreciate that he updated the old hairs of vevesim for free as well! I enjoy his work in general and it seems more worth it than what's become the standard from other creators.
19 notes
·
View notes