I played through fnaf 1-3 (started 4 & hated it too much to finish it), & since then, I have opened up 1 & 2 a bit -- mostly 1. But I really only play it a short bit before I close it, & won't re-open it for quite a while.
On the other hand, I have constantly thought about & gone back for Post-Shift 2. Overall, I just really like the gameplay, but it also has some really good QoL that I wish was in any fnaf game/in more fan-games.
First up, & something I've been complaining about for years -- you can select which night you want. Normally, you can select nights 5, 6, or custom night, if you have beaten the game. If you wanted to go back to night one, you would need to delete your save, which is just kinda annoying. Post-Shift 2, while it is split into 2 exes, lets you pick nights. As long as you've beaten up to that night, you can go back & play all the logs that proceeded it -- if I wanted more practice on night 2, before going into night 3, the game lets me do that & remebers my progress. It's neat!
There's also the use of arrow keys. In the (awful) Uyeah interview, Rjac said a tester has suggested using keybinds for the gameplay. I love. This feature so much. The general formula is WASD for directional movements, Q to look into a blindspot-type area, & E to turn back (with some exceptions -- E is used outside of blindspots to pull up menus, on some logs). You can still click around the screen to do most things, but I just really like this -- feels snappier, tbh. I've thought about hooking up an auto clicker exclusively to have it click things in fnaf, so I could do things like press shift to turn on lights, or ctrl to close the doors.
It's also got this function that probably makes the game mondo unsafe for epilectics, tbh. If you're in danger, the screen will start slowly flashing, then speed up as you run out of time. This makes for a satisfying feeling when you barely escape danger, & the flashing stops. You can visualize how long you've got, better, & the mystery is more figuring out who/getting to where the danger is. Sure, you know the screen is flashing, but do you know which sound queue went off before the flashing?
'course, the game isn't perfect. A big thing I've complained about is what comes after dealing with threats. Most enemies have a little Wario Ware-esque minigame you need to complete, when you encounter them. When you finish it, you press a "done" button, & then a sound or animation plays, & then the threat is dealt with. Unfortunately, the animation/sound is always long enough that you can do what you need to, but still die as you watch the animation, because you aren't safe once you press the done button. You're safe when the animation ends. For a game that flaunts its sound & movement this much, that means waiting a full second or so, which doesn't sound like much, but is definitely enough tome to get you killed.
The fix there is pretty obvious -- switch the order of events. Make the player safe, after the button is pressed, & then play the animation.
I can wish the game was different, sure, but it's still my favorite, & the quirks like that don't bug me.
3 notes
·
View notes
The I feel like she sees me line being said to Eddie who is the person that truly sees Buck for all that he is. Are we supposed to take this line at face value which would indicate piss poor writing because they needed to rush to a horrible ending or do we take it as Buck being an unreliable narrator? What was the audience supposed to interpret from Buck saying that, were we truly supposed to believe him or we supposed to be pissed at Buck for saying this to the one person that truly sees Buck?
Good morning to me, I guess.
I'm assuming you haven't really seen people's reactions in the fandom on tumblr because I feel like I saw this said in quite a few posts going around, but you are absolutely not supposed to take this line at face value. I'm surprised that people think you should. 9-1-1 has from the beginning had a habit of turning friendships into romantic relationships (Bathena and Madney) and taking their time with these things rather than having an instalove situation. Even Karen and Hen, who meet when they're set up on a date together, don't instantly fall in love. I do not think they would set Eddie or Buck up for an endgame relationship with a woman by having them date that woman immediately, even if they didn't plan to make Buddie canon.
Buck is clearly struggling post-death. He's lost and once again looking for the answer from a romantic partner. He did a lot of growth in regards to his family relationships this season but not his romantic ones. Remember, his couch ended up destroyed and he asked his latest girlfriend to pick the new one out for him. Again. He's still not picking his own damn couch. After being unable to sleep on the one his mom gave him but passed out instantly on Eddie's where he ran to feel safe.
If people think this is all, somehow, an accident or the writers are doing this without knowing what they're doing, then I can't help you. Do you also think the symbolism I put into my fanfics are a total accident? Do you guys think I picked the name of the poem "Fuchsia Emerald Alizarin Rose" just because the colors are fun and they accidentally spell out F.E.A.R. or do you think maybe I did that absolutely 100% on purpose and was waiting for someone to realize?
Buck saying that to Eddie is 100% supposed to make the audience raise their eyebrows. Especially when we see Eddie's reaction. He's confused and he's hurt and he's annoyed. Eddie then spends his next few lines showing Buck (and us) that he sees Buck. Buck misses it, it goes right over his head, but the audience is shown that Buck is wrong and Eddie sees him.
I think there was a lot of internal stuff going on behind the scenes way high up the ladder that meant Buddie didn't happen this season. No, I don't mean that in a tinhatting way, I just mean that they knew Fox wouldn't renew them, they didn't know if they'd get picked up somewhere else, Fox hasn't promoted or cared about this show the way it has its other shows in a while, and I think it's pretty clear there was shuffling and changes going on with 6B. So I think things had to be put off. Similar to the pandemic, where I genuinely wonder what kind of season four we would've gotten if we'd had the full 18 episodes and hadn't had to work around Covid. I think that when we know there was a big shift going on behind the scenes, we need to have some grace and patience in how that will effect the story that's told on screen.
But I think that this default to "everything good we see on our screens is an accident and the writers are making shitty choices" is a horrible bad faith argument, and it's exhausting. Aren't you exhausted? I'm exhausted. Fandom shouldn't treat the writing and production team like their enemies any more than the writing and production team should treat the fans like their enemies in some kind of war they have to win (looking at you, GoT showrunners).
We are supposed to be annoyed that Buck is missing the point. We are supposed to see Buck's yearning to be a husband and a father, and how he's missing what's right in front of him. We are supposed to put two and two together and see that Eddie was hurt by Buck's words, that Eddie sees Buck, that Eddie is Buck's safe place, and that Eddie in that moment decided he might not have a chance with Buck and needs to move on, because previously we saw Eddie admit he wants romance again but he doesn't want to go out on dates, we saw his aunt say she met her husband through work, we saw him say 'we have time' and then we saw him immediately after Buck tells him about this new girl who "sees him" flee to visit his mother and then immediately actually try dating. On a meta level this is also because Eddie needs confidence in himself as a romantic partner and needs some more experience under his belt before he's ready to take the plunge with Buck, but in Eddie's mind, I think it's pretty clear he feels Buck will never want him back and he's trying to find the love he wants somewhere else, even if his heart is still Buck's.
So that's what I think. I think it's not explicitly spelled out for a few reasons, but frankly if one of them was a woman we wouldn't need it explicitly spelled out and personally I kinda like that it's not. Something that annoys me with M/F pairings is the constant "we all know you two like each other" talks from third parties that half the time aren't about the characters but are about the audience, to either tell the audience SEE THEY LIKE EACH OTHER THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ABOUT or to give the audience some fanservice while the characters aren't ready to get together. I don't need to be pandered to that way, thank you, so I'm a fan of the slightly more subtle approach that I, personally, see going on with Buddie.
If you or anyone else disagrees with me and feels it was just "piss poor writing" then that's entirely your right. I'd just appreciate it if people who feel that way would stop watching the show, and stop putting their complaints into the inboxes of people who clearly do enjoy the show.
TL;DR - You answered your own question, Buck is an unreliable narrator (and always has been) and we are supposed to be frustrated he said this to Eddie who has proven time and again (and does so in that very scene) that he sees Buck.
15 notes
·
View notes
I understand being critical of remus but there's a real lack of understanding for his lycanthropy that comes as a reason for it on your blog. Kind of weird considering it's often depicted as an allegory for disability and the discrimination that comes with it
i mean,,,,that’s fair i guess? but i’m also gonna have to disagree for a bit there.
i don’t really touch the allegory part of it for…reasons but i’m gonna argue that i’ve never undermined it either. i do not like remus, but most of that is kept in dms and rant channels. what u guys see here is a very sanitised, nUaNcEd version of it. most of what i criticise him for is very like. individual choices he makes.
and ofc i realise that personal actions don’t exist in a vacuum, that those are informed by the structural conditions around him, but at most they can explain what he did, not justify it, yeah?
there’s hundreds of blogs out there that are real sympathetic to remus for precisely this reason. the entire reason i even started being critical was because THAT entirely ignored the fact that his behaviour had consequences for others. perhaps i swung too hard towards the other side but i think i keep it remarkably even here, on my blog at least, considering how much i actually dislike him lol
15 notes
·
View notes