#fuck sora ai

[davidthephoneguy]

What the hell happened to ai doing the hard labour jobs

No robot can make real art, if you think it can you can go fuck yourself because you are lying to yourself. Only a real person can make new real art

Fuck ai, it was meant to work the Amazon warehouses not stealing art to pretend it painted something.

Also fuck capitalism that destroys artists and commodified art.

Anyone who defends this shit will be mocked by every artist on the planet.

[localratwithcowboyhat]

Hey just a lill thing id like to remind fellow artists being scared bc of the shit thats going on w ai rn,

No artificial intelligence can do what we do, creativity creating are all things that happen in the brain, creativity and creating is what we do because we are human.

Art will only die if you let it.

[theasexual-jackson]

Sooo, ai can make videos and animations, now. And I have only one thing to say...

Notice how the first targets of ai were arts. All kinds of them. Music, drawing/paintings, voice acting, and now, animations.

Notice how the job of being an artist is the first one they are willing to replace with robots and not the unhealthy, life risking, mind draining ass jobs that could literally kill a person.

You wanna know why? Because capitalism kills art. Art is one of capitalism's #1 enemy, along with knowledge. Art is a poetic way of communication. Through art you can protest, put your thoughts, spread information, show support. You can't make money out of that.

And when you can't make money out of something successfully, well, you devalue it. “Give up on this art career of yours, it won't get you any money!” “Why not choose medicine, it could get you rich.”

And now they're using ai. They're using robots, to finally finish the job, and get more people exploited under the sun.

Because that's what capitalism is about. Murder. Of dreams, of happiness, of human lifes.

Capitalism is murder. But that's just my opinion...

[seraph-sar]

Ai. Buddy. Pal.

Ven is not a member of the Organization. And even if he was, he would not be one of the tallest ones.

[glassrunner]

i’m so unbelievably fucking frustrated that something as cool and groundbreaking as AI (which i literally went back to college to study!!!) is being used for such fucking nefarious purposes

i always dreamed of finding the spirit in the machine and now it’s just being bastardized to take away jobs from hardworking creators — mostly by arrogant techbro fucknuts who sneer at these creators for pursuing art, but then tell on themselves for not having the discipline to truly learn a craft

[friskytwig]

How to turn off AI training for your tumblr blog.

*Since tumblr is using are art for AI software they've added a setting to get rid of this Heres how:

*Go to settings, Then scroll until you see

*Visibility, then click the bottom one. Which prevents your artwork being used on tumblr for AI. Welcome humans.

[nando161mando]

Fake Facebook MidJourney AI page promoted malware to 1.2 million people

[spaceumbredoggos]

I left character ai because I wanted to protest Sora AI for putting people out of jobs and other ai frightening shit. I wanted to use the free unfiltered other versions because I’m a bit of a perv and I don’t want to be harassed by the guidelines. But it kills my creativity because I barely update my fics and hyperfixate on that.

Tumblr’s fun and shit, but my moots aren’t chronically on it like I am. I’m afraid I’ll lose my streaming ability if I get back on that shit. Hahahaha (marry me Bill Cipher. Fuck. Why did I say that? I’m dumb and horny.)

Please help me @fishy--friend

[bonmonjour]

RIP Information Age (1970-2024). It was fun while it lasted.

[rendoart]

You dont know what you dont know.

You feel like youre alone though,

right?

Instead of losing hope though,

maybe we could learn to fight?

22.02.2024

[renfanart]

hi im back and im here to stay

19.02.2024

[angeltism]

ykw an entire love language is just. associating things to ONE being. only them! that concept? yeah that is Exactly One Being I Know. specific shade of that color? oh my god that's my buddy. a character? literally my bestie right there oh my goodness !! ^__^

[rosieuv]

Oh for fucks sake

And yes, I have watched the entire video.

These AI bros are so fucking pathetic that instead of putting in any hard work to learn how to draw something, they just let the machine do all the work for them to hide their bitter jealousy. The speedpaints aren't even that good. It's not smooth enough, it just looks like someone took a screenshot every 2 minutes. Also nobody changes their drawing in the sketch layer that much unless they have no idea what to draw but want to draw something.

Why isn't there some kind of law to restrict the use of AI? Are we all just so stupid that we're going to let these art snatchers take over our entire media? Don't even get me started on deepfakes. Like, no watermarks? No mandatory disclaimer? Nothing? The only AI tool that I can tolerate is Craiyon because it's images are not that good and should be strictly used for shitposts only. I don't like how you gen put the image you generated onto a t-shirt, but at least there's a watermark on it. Oh and that animation colour filler tool thing that I heard about a while ago. That'll be so useful for animators like me who work by themselves.

And to all the AI bros that keep fucking up my for you page on tumblr with the art tags: you are all pathetic, stupid, wastes of space that should learn to do something that isn't wasting your life on the internet chasing likes and commissions to hide how insecure you feel and that your only source of validation that you feel is screwing over other people with scams. Either that or your ego is so high, you refuse to accept that you don't have any skills apart from chucking 4 words into an image generator. One or the other.

Also why does every AI thing apart from basic chat gpt and craiyon cost money? I know it's for the servers but honestly, the audacity to rip free stuff on the internet and sell it all in one.

[finlaure13]

OpenAI’s Sora: How to Spot AI-Generated Videos | WSJ

OpenAI just revealed Sora – an AI video generator that creates hyper-realistic scenes and animated worlds in moments. But the tech isn’t perfect. There are also concerns over misinformation, with OpenAI saying it’s taking actions to get ready for the 2024 presidential election, including prohibiting the use of its tools for political campaigning.

WSJ dives into how to spot an AI video, and the ways this text-to-video tool could shape the future of content creation.

Chapters:

0:00 New AI video tool

1:00 Spotting an AI video

2:28 Landscape and animation AI videos

5:08 Misinformation and industry concerns

[flaskoflethe]

Well this might dox me. But Microsoft, go fuck yourself. This YOU ARE CLAIMING YOU PARTNER WITH OpenAI TO "Ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI) benefits humanity". Can't post screenshots (work...) but it's literally on the slides. Genuinely fucking floored this is disgusting

[lackadaisycats]

Hey Tracy! Have you heard about the new Ai called Sora? Apparently it can now create 2D and 3D animations as well as hyper realistic videos. I’ve been getting into animation and trying to improve my art for years since I was 7, but now seeing that anyone can create animation/works in just a mare seconds by typing in a couple words, it’s such a huge slap in the face to people who actually put the time and effort into their works and it’s so discouraging! And it has me worried about what’s going to happen next for artists and many others, as-well. There’s already generated voices, generated works stolen from actual artists, generated music, and now this! It’s just so scary that it’s coming this far. 

Yeah, I've seen it. And yeah, it feels like the universe has taken on a 'fuck you in particular' attitude toward artists the past few years. A lot of damage has already been done, and there are plenty of reasons for concern, but bear in mind that we don't know how this will play out yet. Be astute, be justifiably angry, but don't let despair take over. --------

One would expect that the promo clips that have been dropping lately represent some of the best of the best-looking stuff they've been able to produce. And it's only good-looking on an extremely superficial level. It's still riddled with problems if you spend even a moment observing. And I rather suspect, prior to a whole lot of frustrated iteration, most prompts are still going to get you camera-sickness inducing, wibbly-wobbly nonsense with a side of body horror.

Will the tech ultimately get 'smarter' than that and address the array of typical AI giveaways? Maybe. Probably, even. Does that mean it'll be viable in quite the way it's being marketed, more or less as a human-replacer? Well…

A lot of this is hype, and hype is meant to drive up the perceived value of the tech. Executives will rush to be early adopters without a lot of due diligence or forethought because grabbing it first like a dazzled chimp and holding up like a prize ape-rock makes them look like bleeding-edge tech geniuses in their particular ecosystem. They do this because, in turn, that perceived value may make their company profile and valuations go up too, which makes shareholders short-term happy (the only kind of happy they know). The problem is how much actual functional value will it have? And how long does it last? Much of it is the same routine we were seeing with blockchain a few years ago: number go up. Number go up always! Unrealistic, unsustainable forever-growth must be guaranteed in this economic clime. If you can lay off all of your people and replace them with AI, number goes up big and never stops, right?

I have some doubts. ----------------------

The chips also haven't landed yet with regards to the legality of all of this. Will these adopters ultimately be able to copyright any of this output trained on datasets comprised of stolen work? Can computer-made art even be copyrighted at all? How much of a human touch will be required to make something copyright-able? I don't know yet. Neither do the hype team or the early adopters.

Does that mean the tech will be used but will have to be retrained on the adopter's proprietary data? Yeah, maybe. That'd be a somewhat better outcome, at least. It still means human artists make specific things for the machine to learn from. (Watch out for businesses that use 'ethical' as a buzzword to gloss over how many people they've let go from their jobs, though.)

Will it become industry standard practice to do things this way? Maybe. Will it still require an artist's sensbilities and oversignt to plan and curate and fix the results so that it doesn't come across like pure AI trash? Yeah, I think that's pretty likely.

If it becomes standard practice, will it become samey, and self-referential and ultimately an emblem of doing things the cookie-cutter way instead of enlisting real, human artists? Quite possibly.

If it becomes standard industry practice, will there still be an audience or a demand or a desire for art made by human artists? Yes, almost certainly. With every leap of technology, that has remained the case. ------------------ TL;DR Version:

I'm not saying with any certainty that this AI blitz is a passing fad. I think we're likely to experience a torrential amount of generative art, video, voice, music, programming, and text in the coming years, in fact, and it will probably irrevocably change the layout of the career terrain. But I wouldn't be surprised if it was being overhyped as a business strategy right now. And I don't think the immensity of its volume will ever overcome its inherent emptiness.

What I am certain of is that it will not eliminate the innate human impulse to create. Nor the desire to experience art made by a fellow soul. Keep doing your thing, Anon. It's precious. It's authentic. It will be all the more special because it will have come from you, a human.