Sometimes I wish we would start calling out the performative radicalism on this site for the poser bullshit it is. "Remember, it's always morally correct to kill a cop!" "Don't forget to firebomb your local government office!" "Wow, it sure would be a shame if these instructions on how to make a molotov cocktail got spread around!"
Okay. But you're not killing cops or firebombing government offices. You are posting on a dying microblogging website to a carefully-curated echo chamber that has radicalized itself into thinking that taking the absolute most extreme position on any subject is praxis but that anyone discussing the most practical way to effect actual change is your sworn enemy. You do not have the street cred OR the activist cred to be talking about killing cops, babe.
The Timberwolves are Good, and the Warriors Don’t Like It
We talk about the scuffle Draymond Green took too far, the Timberwolves’ maturity, the Wild’s woes on special teams, preview the Vikings/Broncos Sunday night game, and talk Minnesota 9-player football with Kingsland QB/DB Kaaleem Reiland and assistant coach/defensive coordinator Dan Lowe.
Listen here or on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.
Watch here.
The Timberwolves are Good, and the Warriors Don’t…
I am just so fundamentally uninterested in the story where Jason is in the wrong and needs to Gain Perspective or whatever. God what a snore. What an absolute waste of my time.
like i get bruce won't kill joker or whatever (boooooooooo 🙄) but doesn't new jersey or gotham have death penalty? if not, there's no way for joker to be tried by federal justice after how many war crimes this man committed? and then promptly executed, bc i don't think the insanity plea holds to multiple accounts of mass murder, serial killing and premeditated kills
“Buried on page 554 of the plan is a directive to execute every remaining person on federal death row — and dramatically expand the use of the death penalty.”
Some people: well... You see, saying Manfred Von Karma was a terrible father figure to his children is a disservice to his character... We don't really have the ultimate proof he was awful... If he was a decent parental figure, it could actually give him some nuance... He could be more complex than he seems...
The character they're talking about: I SET MY ATM CARD'S NUMBER TO "0001" BECAUSE I'M NUMBER ONE.
my problem is that i always end up emotionally invested in the angry abuse victim character-- the character who is always the "wrong" kind of victim. the one who lashes out and is violent, a complete juxtaposition to their sunshine/lawful good counterparts in the media.
i end up resonating too hard with these characters that i always end up on the shitty side of the fandom where people will see you as a bad person for enjoying representation of an angry victim.