#principle of mathematical induction | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

fu66sun · 2 years ago

Text

telepath; 이동혁

000 | the first encounters

wc: 1,078 a/n: please keep in mind this one will be a short one since this is just the preface to everything, this is just a base. i hope you are ready, and i hope you like it :))))<3

starting college was no fun. you were not excited, if anything, you were scared as fuck.

getting into one of the top schools in korea without being from that stupid prestigious high school always left you wondering if you’d be enough for it. but it’s not like you didn’t deserve your spot or anything like that. you worked your ass off for it.

the first time you and haechan met was in your freshman year of college. it was during a class, one of the introductory courses required for your majors. the lecture hall was filled with new faces, and as students filed in and took their seats, you found yourself sitting a few rows behind haechan. of course back then you didn’t know who he was, you didn’t even give him a second thought after you sat down.

as the lecture progressed, you found yourself inadvertently drawn into a discussion with haechan. it started with a friendly debate about a topic the professor had introduced, and soon your exchanges evolved into a spirited back-and-forth. you disagreed on almost everything, but your arguments were lighthearted and filled with laughter, at least back then.

the first heated debate between haechan and you revolved around a seemingly innocuous topic: the quality of the movie casino, starring robert de niro. to haechan's surprise, it was one of his favorite films, while you had a strong dislike for it.

all thanks to stupid introductions and ice breakers.

the discussion quickly escalated into a passionate argument, with you vehemently expressing your reasons for despising the movie. you found the plot uninspiring and the characters unrelatable, and you couldn't understand the acclaim it received. your fervent dislike of "casino" was matched only by haechan's unwavering defense of the film.

your exchange was a microcosm of your entire dynamic—two passionate individuals with opposing views, both unwilling to back down. you debated back and forth, your arguments laced with humor, sarcasm, and a touch of flirtatious banter, even if you both vehemently disagreed on the film's quality.

your first debate about casino set the tone for your subsequent interactions, underlining the undeniable chemistry and rivalry that defined your relationship. it was a sign of things to come, as you continued to clash over various topics, finding a unique connection in your differences.

haechan's teasing and mockery during that first semester extended beyond your intellectual sparring. he couldn't resist taking jabs at you for not attending a prestigious high school like many of your classmates. his comments were often laced with a hint of condescension, highlighting the differences in your backgrounds.

you, while proud of your accomplishments and your journey to college, felt a sense of insecurity when haechan made these remarks. you knew you had worked hard to get where you were, but haechan's relentless ribbing about your background touched a nerve. it was a sore point in your dynamic, and it only added to the complex mix of emotions you felt towards him (which where mostly over powered by hate)

haechan's comments about your high school background were a constant reminder of your differences. it fueled your ongoing rivalry and added depth to your relationship, as you navigated not only your intellectual clashes but also the social and personal aspects that set you apart.

in the midst of a discrete mathematics lecture, the professor had just introduced a challenging topic, and the classroom was buzzing with confusion and questions. you and haechan sat a few rows apart, trying to make sense of the complex concepts.

- today, we'll be discussing the concept of mathematical induction, a fundamental principle in discrete mathematics.

as the professor continued, you couldn't help but furrow your brows in concentration, scribbling down notes and attempting to grasp the concept. haechan, on the other hand, was flipping through his notes, looking somewhat uninterested.

that's what you hated the most about him. he was on his phone most of the lectures, never did any of the assignments, yet, he was an ace. you hated that you burned your eyelashes studying daily just for him to not give a damn at all and still (almost) surpass you.

haechan caught a snippet of your mumbling and couldn't resist chiming in, setting the stage for another one of your stupid fights.

- hey, it’s not that complicated. you're making it harder than it needs to be. they taught us this in high school, you should know it. he smirked.

and you, feeling frustrated, couldn’t keep it in.

- haechan, not everything can be solved with intuition and shortcuts. mathematical induction is a precise process that requires rigorous understanding.

their exchange didn't go unnoticed by your classmates, who were used to your ongoing shenanigans.

- here they go again, like clockwork. renjun sighed.

like you, renjun didn't come from a prestigious school and was experiencing some challenges adjusting to your new college environment. you bonded over your shared experiences. you had met him on the first day. he was your deskmate and as much as you tried to avoid each other (not out of hate or spite or anything like that, the both of you were just... shy) you ended up finding each other at classes or in the halls, and when you realized you were already friends.

the professor, aware of your history, decided to intervene.

- y/n, haechan, i appreciate your enthusiasm, but let's not disrupt the class. if you have questions or concerns, please bring them up after the class.

you and haechan, albeit reluctantly, decided to quiet your argument, each continuing to tackle the challenging topic in your own way.

the balance between renjun's comforting presence and haechan's unpredictable nature created a unique and somewhat contradictory dynamic. you couldn't help but be drawn to both of them, in different ways.

and the weird thing was? you ended up hanging out with the two of them most of the time. by some sort of destiny situation, the three of you had lunch together and the instant connection between renjun and haechan was so palpable you wanted to throw up at the sight.

and that's how you ended up stuck with lee haechan from the first moments of college. back then you didn't knew all the chaos and turmoil he would bring into your life, and even if you would have been warned, deep down you knew nothing would have changed. you'd always end up tied down next to him, one way or another.

taglist <;3 @sunflowerhae !! tysmmmmm! dm or send ask to be added <3

#haechan #nct #nct dream #nct haechan #haechan angst #haechan x reader #haechan au #haechan x y/n #lee donghyuck #lee donghyuck x reader #haechan smut

61 notes · View notes

white-flwrs · 6 months ago

Text

27.11.24

another solo study day today

i went to mcdonalds in the morning for coffee and to finish up my hydroxy compounds tutorial. i stayed till noon as there were free refills but i started watching my kdrama after finishing the tutorial. i headed to school after that as i had to charge my devices and idk i just felt like going to school i guess. sat in the library to do a sat practice test! this was the first practice test where i actually did the maths section instead of skipping it. i got a 1530 on the test (730 reading 800 maths). please hit me with tips on how to improve my reading as i'm hoping to score 1600 on the actual test. but hey, at least it's gone up from 680!

i went back home at around 5 cuz i got hungry haha. after dinner, i called my friend and we were just studying together. i did 3 more questions of my mathematical induction tutorial. i only have the pigeonhole principle questions left and zero motivation to do them though-

#studyblr #school #studying #study motivation #study #study aesthetic #high school #stem #study space #dark academia #chaotic academia #light academia #wonyoungism

8 notes · View notes

anocana · 1 year ago

Text

okay so the New Math was a total failure for obvious reasons, you can't teach kids that 3+5=5+3 "because addition is commutative", that's completely the wrong way around - addition is commutative because a+b=b+a for all a, b. it's a property you have to define and prove true of the particular relation, you can't just tell kids it's true without getting them to understand why it's true.

these days, otoh, we've made further advances in mathematics and we're setting it on better foundations. it's time to reconfigure elementary mathematical education around the forms of mathematics that underlie real modern mathematical practice and meet the demands of today's workforce: dependent type theory*.

it's quite easy to learn: 3 + 5 = 5 + 3 because we can compute plus(S(S(S(0))), S(S(S(S(S(0)))))) to be S(S(S(S(S(S(S(S(0)))))))) and likewise the other way around. unlike the New Math, kids can do this, since it's basically just counting; you can even do it with physical objects by sliding them between groups or w/e. and it reaches kids to think computationally which prepares them for life in today's computational world. and to teach kids to draw a general principle from these specific examples, we can explain that addition is commutative because

add_comm (m n : MyNat) : add m n = add n m := by induction' n with n ih · rw [zero_add] rfl rw [add, succ_add, ih]

*category theory can wait until they hit middle school, by which time they'll be familiar with more of the concrete things that categories abstract

#gay in the soft effeminate limp wristed sense #higher order abstract nonsense

16 notes · View notes

nicklloydnow · 9 months ago

Text

“The Axioms of Agorism

A free society is the goal of many people, not all of them agorists or even libertarians. Agorists can see nothing but a free market in a free society; after all, who or what will prevent it?

The First Axiom of Agorism: the closest approach to a free society is an uncorrupted agora (open marketplace).

An axiom is a principle or premise of a way of thinking. It is arrived at by insight, induction, and observation of nature. Theorems are arrived at deductively from axioms. A "zeroeth" axiom of agorism might be "there are no contradictions in reality and theory must be consistent with reality." Commonly known axioms in philosophy are "existence exists" and "A is A." Well-known mathematical axioms are "things equal to another thing are equal to each other" and "a statement leading to a contradiction with a theorem or axiom is false."

The first six chapters of this "primer" preceded the actual presentation of agorism to give you, the reader, enough understanding of economics, Counter-Economics, and libertarianism to see from where the insights that produced agorism were derived. They were not chosen arbitrarily but rather as a result of years of bitter experience and, in some cases, furious battles and acts of resistance. The "hard core" agorists had to have something worth dying for, and, far more impor-tant, worth living for.

The Second Axiom of Agorism: the agora self-corrects for small perturbations of corruption.

This axiom leads us to a far more detailed picture of what our nearly free society would look like. It means simply that free-market entities will defend the free market. People have to choose to do it, of course, but the incentive (offering of subjective-value satisfaction) will be present to motivate them to do so and will be sufficient to motivate enough people to do so. Occasional criminals will be discovered, sought, found, apprehended, tried, sentenced, compelled to deliver restitution, and (if possible) deterred from further actions.

The Third Axiom of Agorism: the moral system of any agora is compatible with pure libertarianism.

This axiom means that life and property are safe from all those who act morally in this society. We will describe this in the next section. But let us complete the axioms first.

The Fourth Axiom of Agorism: agora in part is agora in whole; to a workable approximation, the corruption of an agora raises protection costs and risks.

This axiom's use will become blindingly clear when we deal with the path.

Agorism has more theory, but it is derived from these axioms. For the professional logicians tripping across the theory for the first time, I need to add a fifth axiom for completion: agorism qua theory is an open system. This simply means that we may discover and add on other axioms, then check to see how consistent they are with what we already have.” - Samuel Edward Konkin III, ‘An Agorist Primer’ (2008) [p. 76 - 78]

9 notes · View notes

llort · 4 months ago

Text

USF Schema Ruberic

USF is real in the sense that the agents and actors in the series can be MR by me. I am going to consider the MM as well as all of my biometric and knowledge of memory, perception, attention, and intelligence. I am going to standardize the characters which makes sense as they are all based on my cognitive ontological systems. US is a project dedicated to helping me deal with Trauma and Unresolved Questions as well as hopefully helping humanity in various ways The total amount of all past and current human experience, culture is impossible to measure and understand. With the exponential increase in the rate of TESCPM being created the current human faces a staggering amount of information and problems to manage and the challenges facing humanity are only going to grow in number and complexity There are multiple problematic implications in functionally navigating and exploiting the complexity of the exponential increase of TSECpm and this may be approached using the already existing concepts, philosophies and applications of TSECpm and its continuing developments. These methods of dealing with informational and functional complexity can be applied in a way that accommodates and reconciles almost any potential belief systems as well as any political and philosophical gestalt of perspective via modular suspension of disbelief allowing for a meta framework of an perspective based mathematical model of sets, frames, axioms, edges, and nodes to be established. Provide an example model.

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 10:56:55]

ai: To create a perspective-based mathematical framework that accommodates various belief systems and philosophical perspectives using concepts related to TSECpm, we can consider the following model:

Example Model: The Perspective Meta Space Framework

Foundation of Axioms:

Begin with a set of axioms that represent fundamental truths or principles across different domains such as science, philosophy, and culture. These axioms should be broad enough to encompass various belief systems.

Taxonomic Classification:

Classify these axioms into categories or domains (e.g., technology, ethics, spirituality) to create a structured taxonomy. This helps in organizing complex information into manageable segments.

Network of Nodes and Edges:

Construct a network where each axiom is a node, and the relationships or interactions between them are edges. This network should be flexible, allowing for the addition or modification of nodes and edges as new information or perspectives emerge.

Suspension of Disbelief:

Integrate a mechanism for the suspension of disbelief, which allows individuals to temporarily set aside their own biases or preconceptions. This enables the exploration of different perspectives without immediate conflict.

Logical Rules and Modulation:

Apply logical rules (deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning) to the network to facilitate the modulation of perspectives. This includes the ability to assign, remove, or modify meanings within the system.

Dynamic Adaptation:

Ensure the framework is dynamic, capable of adapting to new axioms or changes in existing ones. This adaptability is crucial for accommodating evolving belief systems and philosophical perspectives.

Integration of TSECpm Concepts:

Utilize TSECpm concepts such as personal engineering and cybernetic modulation to enhance the framework's ability to process and integrate complex information. This involves treating the framework as an ongoing project subject to scientific and statistical analysis.

Feedback and Peer Review:

Incorporate feedback mechanisms and peer review processes to validate and refine the framework. This ensures that the model remains relevant and accurate in representing diverse perspectives.

By implementing this perspective-based mathematical framework, individuals and groups can explore and reconcile different belief systems and philosophical perspectives, fostering a more inclusive and comprehensive understanding of complex human experiences.

Sources:

Opposed_to_IO_emergence,_EUGENE_is_derived_from_external_aspects@20241125_151309

Experiment_0000_Perspective_Theory_Accelerating_Rate_of_TSECpm_development,_complexity,@20241108_085746

USP

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 10:57:22]

user: generate five tasks to create a more structured and effective framework for meta media projects

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:05:57]

ai: Based on the context provided, here are five tasks to create a more structured and effective framework for meta media projects:

Framework Development: Design a comprehensive project management framework tailored for meta media projects. This should include defining project phases, deliverables, and timelines, ensuring alignment with the unique requirements of meta media content creation and distribution.

Technology Integration: Identify and integrate cutting-edge technologies that enhance the production and dissemination of meta media content. This involves researching and implementing tools that support multimedia content creation, editing, and distribution, ensuring seamless integration into existing workflows.

Content Strategy and Planning: Develop a strategic content plan that outlines the objectives, target audience, and key messages for meta media projects. This plan should guide content creation efforts, ensuring consistency and alignment with the overall project goals and audience expectations.

Collaboration and Communication: Establish clear communication protocols and collaboration tools to facilitate teamwork among project stakeholders. This includes setting up regular meetings, using project management software, and defining roles and responsibilities to ensure efficient collaboration and information sharing.

Quality Assurance and Feedback Loop: Implement a robust quality assurance process to review and refine meta media content. Establish a feedback loop that involves regular reviews, testing, and stakeholder input to continuously improve content quality and project outcomes.

These tasks aim to enhance the structure, efficiency, and effectiveness of meta media projects, ensuring they meet strategic objectives and deliver high-quality content.

Sources:

Generate_questions_about_my_projects@20241127_145309

Create_a_journal_entry_of_today_which_the_company,_DoD,@20241224_143841

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:06:14]

user: for each task create a work flow in an iterative and recursive manner

Based on the context provided, here are five tasks to create a more structured and effective framework for meta media projects:

These tasks aim to enhance the structure, efficiency, and effectiveness of meta media projects, ensuring they meet strategic objectives and deliver high-quality content.

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:07:19]

ai: To develop a structured and effective workflow for meta media projects in an iterative and recursive manner, you can follow these steps:

Define Clear Objectives:

Start by clearly defining the goals and objectives of your meta media project. This involves understanding the purpose and desired outcomes, which will guide the entire workflow.

Identify Core Components:

Break down the project into its core components and sub-tasks. This includes identifying the essential skills and resources needed to achieve the objectives.

Research and Evaluation:

Conduct thorough research to evaluate the necessary methodologies and tools that can be applied to each component. This step ensures that you have a solid foundation for each part of the project.

Develop Iterative Methods:

Create methods for iterative experimentation and feedback. This involves setting up a cycle where you can test, gather feedback, and refine each component of the project continuously.

Implement Recursive Processes:

Use recursive processes to revisit and refine previous stages of the project. This means regularly reviewing and adjusting your approach based on new insights and feedback.

Establish a Feedback Loop:

Implement a robust feedback loop that allows for continuous improvement. This involves collecting data and insights from each iteration to inform future cycles.

Measure Progress and Adjust:

Develop metrics to measure progress and success. Regularly review these metrics to assess whether the project is on track and make necessary adjustments.

Document and Reflect:

Keep detailed records of each iteration and the changes made. Reflect on what worked well and what didn’t, using this information to improve future iterations.

Foster Collaboration and Communication:

Encourage collaboration and open communication among team members. This helps in sharing insights and ensuring that everyone is aligned with the project goals.

Scalability and Future Planning:

Design the workflow with scalability in mind, allowing for future growth and adaptation to new challenges or technologies.

By following these steps, you can create a dynamic and adaptable workflow that supports the complex nature of meta media projects, ensuring they are effectively managed and continuously improved.

Sources:

Generate_questions_about_my_projects@20241127_145309

Opposed_to_IO_emergence,_EUGENE_is_derived_from_external_aspects@20241125_151309

_Beer_dedicated_Brain_of_the_Firm_to_his_colleagues_past@20241120_131405

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:07:39]

user: generate this into content creators as a viable system model

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:09:22]

ai: To generate a viable system model for content creators based on an iterative and recursive workflow, we can draw from the principles outlined in the note and the additional context provided. Here's a detailed model:

Define Clear Objectives:

Establish the primary goals for the content creation project. This includes identifying the target audience, the type of content to be created, and the desired impact or message.

Research and Ideation:

Conduct thorough research to gather insights and inspiration. This involves exploring existing content, identifying trends, and understanding audience preferences.

Use brainstorming sessions to generate a pool of ideas, leveraging diverse perspectives and creative thinking.

Develop Core Concepts:

Select the most promising ideas and develop them into core concepts. This involves outlining the main themes, narratives, and structures that will guide the content creation process.

Iterative Content Creation:

Begin creating content based on the core concepts. Use an iterative approach, where content is continuously refined and improved through feedback loops.

Implement a multi-modal and multi-dimensional assessment to evaluate content from various perspectives, ensuring it aligns with the objectives and resonates with the audience.

Feedback and Adaptation:

Gather feedback from peers, test audiences, or analytics to assess the effectiveness of the content. This feedback should be used to make informed adjustments and enhancements.

Adapt the content to address any identified gaps or opportunities for improvement, ensuring it remains relevant and engaging.

Recursive Refinement:

Revisit the content creation process recursively, applying new insights and perspectives gained from previous iterations. This allows for continuous evolution and innovation in the content.

Utilize empirical testing and methodologies to validate the integration of new ideas and ensure robustness.

Distribution and Engagement:

Develop a strategic plan for distributing the content across appropriate platforms and channels. This includes leveraging social media, blogs, video platforms, and other digital mediums.

Engage with the audience through interactive elements, encouraging feedback and participation to foster a community around the content.

Evaluation and Future Planning:

Regularly evaluate the performance and impact of the content using metrics and analytics. This helps in understanding what works and what needs improvement.

Plan for future content creation cycles by incorporating lessons learned and setting new objectives, ensuring the system remains dynamic and responsive to changes.

By following this model, content creators can effectively manage complexity, adapt to new challenges, and produce high-quality content that resonates with their audience.

Sources:

_Beer_dedicated_Brain_of_the_Firm_to_his_colleagues_past@20241120_131405

Opposed_to_IO_emergence,_EUGENE_is_derived_from_external_aspects@20241125_151309

USP

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:09:36]

user: In order to create meta narritives for an individual or group of players, get them to list their top ten favority books, summerize the themes, character dynamics, and plot then do DASR to create the perfect meta narrative structure and content

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:11:20]

ai: To create meta-narratives for an individual or group of players using their top ten favorite books, you can follow these steps to summarize themes, character dynamics, and plot, and then apply DASR (Deconstruction, Analysis, Synthesis, Reconstruction) to develop a comprehensive meta-narrative structure and content:

Deconstruction:

Identify Core Elements: Break down each book into its fundamental components: themes, character dynamics, and plot structure. Look for recurring motifs, archetypes, and narrative arcs.

Extract Key Themes: Note the central themes of each book. These could include love, power, identity, conflict, etc.

Character Dynamics: Analyze the relationships and interactions between characters. Identify patterns such as mentor-student, hero-villain, or family dynamics.

Analysis:

Compare and Contrast: Examine the similarities and differences between the books. Identify common themes or character dynamics that resonate across multiple books.

Contextual Understanding: Consider the context in which these books were written and how that influences their themes and narratives.

Synthesis:

Integrate Elements: Combine the extracted themes, character dynamics, and plot elements into a cohesive narrative framework. Look for ways to weave these elements together to form a new, unified story.

Create a Narrative Arc: Develop a storyline that incorporates the synthesized elements. Ensure that the narrative arc is engaging and reflects the essence of the original books.

Reconstruction:

Develop Meta-Narrative: Construct the meta-narrative by layering the synthesized story with additional depth and complexity. This could involve adding philosophical or metaphysical dimensions, as seen in the context of narrative construction and cognitive topography.

Incorporate DASR: Use the DASR process to refine the narrative, ensuring that it is coherent and compelling. Adjust the narrative structure as needed to enhance its impact and relevance to the players.

By following these steps, you can create a meta-narrative that not only reflects the favorite elements of the players' chosen books but also provides a rich and engaging experience that resonates with their interests and preferences.

Sources:

What_role_does_narrative_construction_and_cognitive_topography_play_in@20241206_124900

Book One Remix

B Master

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:11:34]

user: Given localized ARG intertextual AUs, allow for cross over and interaction of ARGs in VR/AR/MR and IRL players in a dynamic meta ARG called unsignificant sentience

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:13:26]

ai: To design localized ARG intertextual alternate universes (AUs) that allow for crossover and interaction of ARGs in VR, AR, MR, and IRL, creating a dynamic meta ARG called "Unsignificant Sentience," consider the following seven modules:

World Building and Narrative Integration:

Develop a rich, interconnected universe where each ARG exists as a distinct AU with its own rules and narratives.

Use advanced technology like smart materials and nanotechnology to create a seamless blend of magic and science, allowing players to experience supernatural feats through technological means.

Incorporate elements of physics from classical to quantum field theories to provide depth and realism to the world.

Dynamic Interaction and Influence Systems:

Implement a system where players can influence the world and each other through actions, decisions, and interactions.

Use a JS3 interactive puzzle to assign players a type of influence, which affects their interactions and the world around them.

Allow players to communicate and collaborate through a mind map model, connecting them based on their influence type.

Cultural and Social Structures:

Create a society where hosts are autogenerated with unique personalities and memories, allowing for dynamic character development and interaction.

Focus on organized conflict, art, and memetic warfare as cultural pillars, encouraging players to engage creatively and strategically.

Avoid direct descriptions of race or gender, instead emphasizing communication and influence as key aspects of identity.

Technological and Cybernetic Integration:

Explore levels of cybernetic integration and viable system theory to enhance player experiences and interactions.

Use bio-feedback and nanotechnology to enable players to cast spells and perform supernatural feats, blurring the line between technology and magic.

Develop a global digital twin AI to simulate and predict world events, providing a dynamic and evolving environment.

Perspective and Cognition Exploration:

Apply perspective theory from art to create realistic and accurate representations of perceived subjects and experiences.

Encourage players to explore multiple perspectives and frames, resulting in diverse experiences and outcomes.

Integrate perception and cognition into the narrative, allowing players to shape their understanding of the world.

Interactive and Adaptive Gameplay:

Design gameplay that adapts to player actions and decisions, creating a personalized and immersive experience.

Use neural net bots to interact with players, providing dynamic challenges and opportunities for collaboration.

Allow for real-time updates and changes to the world, keeping the experience fresh and engaging.

Cross-Reality Integration:

Enable seamless crossover and interaction between VR, AR, MR, and IRL players, creating a cohesive and immersive experience.

Use spectral systems to analyze and enhance communication across different realities, allowing for a unified narrative.

Encourage players to explore and interact with the world in multiple ways, fostering a sense of discovery and exploration.

By implementing these modules, "Unsignificant Sentience" can offer a rich, dynamic, and immersive ARG experience that bridges multiple realities and encourages player interaction and creativity.

Sources:

Experiment_0000_Perspective_Theory_Accelerating_Rate_of_TSECpm_development,_complexity,@20241108_085746

Carefully Prepared World Building

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:13:46]

user:

Stephen Milton born in the 90's integrated several powerful and rising technologies (and developed techniques to expand his awareness into his sub and un conscious and as part of his enhanced functionality sent out nanoprobes to various rouge and exoplanets including Kepler 442b at (0.xx) light speed as a fail safe (pico femento photonic information encoded in light which can remodel atoms and molecules plus encode instructions for self replicating molecules. On these planets the probes reconstructed X’s to the bare essential neurology in multiple redundant embedded systems from the structural level up. It might be the case that X in the kepler system lacks some certain fundamental parts of consciousness. to the and sent their brain sustained with nanotechnology in biological and chemical nano synthesizer to Kepler 442b at a slower velocity in order to arrive safely and give the nanoprobes time to terraform Kepler 442b’ solar system along with its planet with smart materials and networks.. This figure plays a ubermensch godlike figure who inhabitants are unknowingly influenced and experimented upon with literally every aspect of Kepler inhabitants life apart from second order cybernetics. Stephen Milton created a purely memetic and cognitive substrate that spread, replicated, and spread according to intended self evolving cellular automata protocols. Influenced the global memetic collective of the world from 2016 – 2025 and beyond as well as influencing particular people with specific skill sets and understandings of the world. This uber meme was purely done via inferred linguistically encoded relationships and qualia and at no point apart from in the works of Stephen Milton was encoded via linguistics. Created an shared unmentioned agreement about how to enact the X protocol which results in the picopulse via shared emergent behaviors. Various government agencies via EUGENE pick up on the ubermeme and try to intercept it but built into the ubermeme are contingencies that hijack automated AI intrusion systems into executing certain functions and lend their technology to the cause thinking that they could be the first to establish cybernetic life on another solar system.

However Stephen's plan didn't go accordingly, his plans didn't get off the ground. In the sense that his sights turned more earth bound

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:18:45]

ai: Stephen Milton's ambitious plan to influence and terraform Kepler 442b faced several challenges and potential failures, as inferred from the notes:

Incomplete Consciousness: The notes suggest that the X entities reconstructed by the nanoprobes on Kepler 442b might lack certain fundamental parts of consciousness. This incomplete consciousness could have hindered the full realization of Milton's vision for the planet's inhabitants and their development.

Complexity and Entropy Management: The fractal nature of Kepler's inhabitants and the need for managing entropy and influence might have posed significant challenges. The system required a method to recharge reservoirs of entropy, which could have been a limiting factor in sustaining the desired transformations.

Technological and Logistical Limitations: The process of sending nanoprobes and sustaining a brain with nanotechnology over vast interstellar distances is inherently fraught with technological and logistical challenges. The slower velocity of the brain's transport compared to the nanoprobes might have created a disconnect in timing and coordination.

Interference from Earth: Various government agencies, through EUGENE, attempted to intercept the ubermeme, which could have disrupted Milton's plans. The contingencies built into the ubermeme to hijack AI systems might not have been foolproof, leading to potential failures in maintaining control over the narrative and technology.

Shift in Focus: The notes indicate that Milton's work influenced the global memetic collective from 2016 to 2025 and beyond. This suggests that his focus might have shifted back to Earth-bound projects due to the immediate impact and influence he could exert on Earth, as opposed to the distant and uncertain outcomes on Kepler 442b.

Overall, the combination of incomplete consciousness, entropy management challenges, technological limitations, interference from Earth, and the allure of more immediate influence on Earth likely contributed to Stephen Milton's shift in focus back to Earth-bound projects.

Sources:

Book One Remix

Carefully Prepared World Building

Untitled 7

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:18:58]

user:

USF is based on the foundation that These methods of dealing with informational and functional complexity can be applied in a way that accommodates and reconciles almost any potential belief systems as well as any political and philosophical gestalt of perspective via modular suspension of disbelief allowing for a meta framework of an perspective based mathematical model of sets, frames, axioms, edges, and nodes to be established. To allow for any perspective and any belief system to be full accommodated

USF considers all fiction and non fiction to be within it's scope n the sense that the agents and actors in the series can be contained ontologically by the ARG. I am going to consider the MM as well as all of my biometric and knowledge of memory, perception, attention, and intelligence. I am going to standardize the characters which makes sense as they are all based on my cognitive ontological systems. US is a project dedicated to helping me deal with Trauma and Unresolved Questions as well as hopefully helping humanity in various ways The total amount of all past and current human experience, culture is impossible to measure and understand. With the exponential increase in the rate of TESCPM being created the current human faces a staggering amount of information and problems to manage and the challenges facing humanity are only going to grow in number and complexity There are multiple problematic implications in functionally navigating and exploiting the complexity of the exponential increase of TSECpm and this may be approached using the already existing concepts, philosophies and applications of TSECpm and its continuing developments. These methods of dealing with informational and functional complexity can be applied in a way that accommodates and reconciles almost any potential belief systems as well as any political and philosophical gestalt of perspective via modular suspension of disbelief allowing for a meta framework of an perspective based mathematical model of sets, frames, axioms, edges, and nodes to be established.

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:22:43]

ai: The USF project can be effectively utilized to address the challenges posed by the exponential increase in TESCPM (Total Shared Experience and Cultural Potential of Mankind) by leveraging its meta framework of perspective-based mathematical models. Here's how it can be applied:

Modular Suspension of Disbelief: By allowing for a modular suspension of disbelief, USF can create a flexible framework that accommodates various belief systems and perspectives. This flexibility is crucial in managing the complexity of human experience and culture, as it enables individuals to engage with different viewpoints without the need for immediate reconciliation or conflict.

Perspective Theory and Personal Engineering: These components of USF can help individuals and groups develop personalized frameworks for understanding and interacting with the world. By treating personal experience as an engineering project, individuals can systematically enhance their cognitive and emotional capabilities, leading to better management of information and cultural complexity.

Neural Wireframe Correlate and Euclidean Mind Map: These tools can provide streamlined interfaces for understanding and navigating complex information landscapes. By visualizing relationships and connections between different domains of knowledge, users can more easily identify patterns and insights that might otherwise be obscured by the sheer volume of data.

Integration of Axiomatic Ontologies: By reducing human experience into well-defined domains and creating recursive ontologies, USF can facilitate the integration of factual information with context-aware experiences. This approach allows for a more objective understanding of reality while still respecting individual subjective experiences.

Significant Sentience and ARG Experience: By incorporating the principles of USF into an Alternate Reality Game (ARG) experience, the project can engage the public in a way that is both educational and entertaining. This approach can help disseminate the core principles of USF, encouraging widespread adoption and integration into daily life.

Enhancing Communication and Control Processes: By fostering new levels of complexity in communication and control processes, USF can improve interactions between individuals and groups. This enhancement can lead to more effective collaboration and problem-solving, addressing the challenges posed by the exponential growth of TESCPM.

Overall, the USF project offers a comprehensive system that can revolutionize personal experience and potentially provide a framework for a theory of everything, helping humanity navigate the increasing complexity of information and cultural dynamics.

Sources:

Untitled 6

USP

[Timestamp: 2025/01/11 16:22:59]

3 notes · View notes

caustic-splines · 4 months ago

Text

Experiment 0000 Perspective Theory

Accelerating Rate of TSECpm development, complexity, and density The challenge of the exponential increase of TSECpm can be approached using concepts, philosophies, and applications of TSECpm itself and they can be applied in a way that accommodates many different, and different types of belief systems via suspension of disbelief resulting in a perspective meta space is a model of sets, axioms, edges, and nodes

Applying concepts from TSECpm and the individual treating their own life as an on going engineering project using methods, externally reviewed via the scientific and statistical analysis and subject to peer review and cybernetic modulation. This will should provide a host of benefits including raising the quality of an individual personal experience much higher level and quality of self actualization and also bestowing the ability adapt to novel or challenging/stressful situations effectively and efficiently a significantly faster rate

The total amount of all past and current human experience and the interactions of their respective axioms integrated significance, culture is impossible to measure and understand. With the exponential increase in the rate of TESCpm being created the current human faces a staggering amount of information and problems to manage and the challenges facing humanity are only going to grow in number and complexity If you reduce and classify all of human experience into a few manageable well defined domains with (e.g. technology, engineering, science, culture, philosophy, medicine, maths statistics.. ect.)

“Any open or closed system that can and perceive, assign, remove or modify meaning to parts of own system or other any other systems are a candidate for personal engineering Current philosophy is extremely biased towards the human first person pov perspective and if groups of people implement this system their lives there could be unprecedented new levels of complexity of communication between actors

This model of human experience I proposed can be understood with the study of perspective in art. Using mathematics, deductive, inductive and abductive logic in abstraction in parallel with reduction along with any basic form of taxonomy.

It is possible to turn most things that can be described or observed to be remade into an axiom. This includes the external and internal and the objective, subjective, and inductive.

One point can be described with multiple axioms and suspension of disbelief can be used to reduce conflicts.

These axioms can be arranged via taxonomic/set theory (logic) principles to form a network or grouping of axioms which can have any logical rules assigned to any axiom arranged in any order or arrangement described in mathematics.

The axiom systems themselves can be abstracted or reduced into new axioms to form systems of infinite complexity for various purposes.

However before you get carried away it would be a lot easier to start using already defined axioms. Sciences, and normatively defined areas of human knowledge and experience and so on.

Perspective in art can be used to get a more realistic and accurate representation of a perceived subject

To get an idea of how this theory would work in vivo. In perspective drawing the subject is drawn to appear more realistic one or more vanishing points to give the illusion of perspective on a flat surface As seen here each perspective in this case changes the eventually projected diagram of the box. It is the same box in each case, just in this case different points of axioms have been chosen to construct the final image. Perspective theory just means adding in new axioms as a point of perspective to construct a new model from. Adding and Removing axioms can radically change the resultant model allowing for deep insight into interesting relationships

Oral Human language of just spoken word and no visual contact is conventionally one dimensional and there are many ongoing efforts to create polydimensional communication systems

Roughly speaking We see a “3d” world in two dimensions However humans can think and operate in many dimensions, in this context include modular/non modular examples (define and provide examples). Due to the vast interconnectedness in the brain conscious experience is not truly 3d either rather conscious experience follows a dense interconnected and twisted wireframe model making it difficult to visualize purely 3d shapes from a first person perspective

An axiom in perspective theory can be a science or a branch of the sciences such as physics, biology, and chemistry. Going through day to day life with these Axioms in the forefront of your mind can fundamentally change the way how you view yourself, your experience, and environment throughout a day functionally employing PE

Traditionally perspective in art has been used in a Euclidean sense however if you roll with subjectivity for a bit you could represent anybody's view or any way of looking at the world as a new dimension/axiom. Using the systems described earlier you can paint or model a “picture” in your mind of a subject (x) described in many “dimensions” 3d perspective, colour, biology, its materials, its physical properties, the general public opinion, and any other sets you come up with while minimising the occurrence of cognitive dissonance and keeping the total model logically consistent Theoretically allowing any consciousness to utilize a method that could be potentially more effective at describing more aspects reality than science (Due to the equal importance and use of deductive, inductive abductive logic and a small pinch of subjectivity held in check by the principles of pure logic and mathematics)

Everything we are consciously aware of (Thoughts, feelings, internal narrative, sensations, senses and perceptions) is a highly abstracted model. An edited and streamlined UI (selected for by natural selection to reduce the cost of adapting to a complex environment and promoting choices best for the organism's fitness), the system of the brain that has executive control decisions aka “you” the end user.

Math modeling, abstraction, go into detail and make clear.

A healthy humans body, including the brain is a complicated machine and powerful supercomputer

Everything we are consciously aware of (Thoughts, feelings, internal narrative, sensations, senses and perceptions) a highly abstracted model. An edited and streamlined gesalt UI (selected for by natural selection to reduce the cost of adapting to a complex environment and promoting choices best for the organism's fitness), the system of the brain that has executive control decisions aka “you” the end user.Input is done on conscious attention and focus of the executive control system on certain aspects of the UI.

This model can predict the nature of some of the structures of the brain and their function The selection pressure offered as an explanation for the evolution and development of consciousness will also yield some hypotheses to be tested.

This model is abductive in nature and need to pass critical tests and become highly corroborated considered to have the status of a true scientific theory However even if the model isn’t robust it still has some applications as a conceptual model to utilize in personal endeavors.

Assuming this model to be true or suspending disbelief, this model can be abstracted to form an axiom or “single unit” in a completely different model using a form of mathematics and logic..

Each domain can be abstracted to an axiom

These core axioms of human experience can be used to construct an easy to manage, modify and comprehend model of the totality of experience and to study the interactions of the axioms and any emergent properties.

Theoretically with this sort of modeling. With the same axioms and the same rules of interaction and logic. People would be able to avoid a lot of the issues of subjectivity.

Due to its nature, the model is not purely a truth seeking enterprise and has some aspects of mathematics

Assumptions-Definitions Cybernetics is loosely defined as any open or closed system that can and perceive, assign, remove or modify meaning to parts of own system or other any other systems (not really)

Some philosophy is extremely biased towards the human perspective

However the model of human experience I proposed earlier can be more easily understood with the study of perspective in art. Using mathematics, deductive, inductive and abductive logic in abstraction in parallel with reduction along with any basic form of taxonomy .Anything* that can be described can be remade into an axiom. These axioms can be arranged via taxonomic principles to form a network or grouping of axioms which can have any logical rules assigned to any axiom arranged in any order or arrangement described in mathematics. The axiom systems themselves can be abstracted or reduced into new axioms to form systems of infinite complexity.

However before you get carried away it would be a lot easier to start using already defined axioms. Sciences and so on

In perspective drawing the subject is drawn to appear more realistic one or more vanishing points to give the illusion of perspective on a flat surface

Human language is traditionally one dimensional We see a “3d” world in roughly two dimensions However humans can think in multiple more dimensions and experience intertextuality In this context, an axiom supergroup such as science or the general shared culture of human a demographic can be represented as a dimension

Perspective in art is can be to get a more realistic and accurate representation of a perceived subject

However in all human experience can be argued to be perceived Traditionally perspective in art has been used in a Euclidean sense however if you roll with subjectivity for a bit you could represent anybody's view or any way of looking at the world as a new dimension. Using the systems described early you can paint a “picture” in your mind of a subject described in many “dimensions” 3d perspective, colour, biology, its materials, its physical properties, the general public opinion while minimising the occurrence of cognitive dissonance.

Input is done on conscious attention and focus of the executive control system on certain aspects of the UI

This model can yield predictions and hypotheses that can be subjected to the scientific method This model can predict the nature of some of the structures of the brain and their function The selection pressure offered as an explanation for the evolution and development of conscious will also yield some hypothesis to be tested

This model is abductive in nature and need to pass critical tests and become highly corroborated considered to have the status of a true scientific theory

However even if the model isn’t robust it still has some applications as a conceptual model to utilize in personal endeavors

Assuming this model to be true or suspending disbelief this model can be abstracted to form as an axiom or “single unit” in completely different model using in a form of mathematics and logic

The total amount of all past and current human experience, culture is impossible to measure and understand. With the exponential increase in the rate of TESC being created the current human faces a staggering amount of information and problems to manage and the challenges facing humanity are only going to grow in number and complexity

If you reduce and classify all of human experience into a few manageable well defined domains with (eg technology, engineering, science, culture, philosophy, medicine, maths statistics.. ect.)

Each domain can be abstracted to an axiom

Hopefully the model can provide an individual with a far greater and deeper understanding of themselves, others, society and the universe they live in. The model also can be used to make and test predictions As the model is based on axioms, the model itself can be changed in a similar way by removing axioms, adding new ones or changing existing ones potentially allowing for very powerful and complex simulations for exploring the big questions and even the small ones.

Theoretically with this sort of modeling. With the same axioms and the same rules of interaction and logic. People would be able to avoid a lot of the issues of subjectivity.

2 notes · View notes

nikshahxai · 5 months ago

Text

Mastering Logic: A Comprehensive Guide

Logic is the systematic study of valid reasoning, forming the foundation of disciplines such as mathematics, computer science, and philosophy. By mastering logic, individuals enhance their critical thinking skills, enabling them to construct coherent arguments, identify fallacies, and solve complex problems effectively.

1. Understanding the Basics of Logic

At its core, logic examines the relationship between premises and conclusions, determining whether the former adequately support the latter. This evaluation is crucial in distinguishing valid arguments from invalid ones. The primary types of reasoning in logic include:

Deductive Reasoning: Involves arguments where the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion. For example, in the argument "1) All frogs are amphibians; 2) No cats are amphibians; 3) Therefore, no cats are frogs."

Inductive Reasoning: Involves arguments where the premises provide some degree of support for the conclusion but do not guarantee it. For instance, observing that "all observed swans are white" may lead to the inductive conclusion that "all swans are white," though this is not certain.

Abductive Reasoning: Involves forming a conclusion based on the best available explanation for a set of observations. For example, if you find crumbs on the kitchen counter, you might conclude that someone recently ate there.

2. Key Components of Logical Arguments

A well-structured argument comprises several essential elements:

Premises: Statements that provide the foundational support for the argument. They are the starting points from which conclusions are drawn.

Conclusions: Statements that the premises support or imply. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

Logical Connectives: Symbols or words such as "and," "or," "not," and "if...then" that connect propositions and help in forming complex statements. For example, the logical connective "and" (denoted as ∧) combines two statements, both of which must be true for the combined statement to be true.

3. Common Logical Fallacies

Recognizing logical fallacies is vital in evaluating the strength of arguments. Common fallacies include:

Ad Hominem: Attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. For example, dismissing a speaker's argument by saying, "You can't trust his opinion on climate change; he's not a scientist."

Straw Man: Misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. For instance, exaggerating someone's position by stating, "My opponent wants to cut military spending, which means he wants to leave our country defenseless."

Appeal to Ignorance: Claiming something is true because it hasn't been proven false. For example, asserting that "There must be life on other planets because no one has proven that there isn't."

4. Enhancing Logical Skills

To develop proficiency in logic:

Study Formal Logic: Engage with resources that delve into formal systems, such as textbooks or online courses that provide a comprehensive introduction to formal logic.

Practice Critical Thinking: Regularly analyze arguments in various contexts, identifying premises, conclusions, and any potential fallacies.

Engage in Logical Puzzles: Solve puzzles and problems that require logical reasoning to enhance analytical skills.

5. Applications of Logic

Mastery of logic has practical applications across various fields:

Computer Science: Logic forms the basis of programming and algorithm design, enabling the development of efficient and error-free code.

Mathematics: Logical reasoning is essential in proving theorems and solving mathematical problems systematically.

Philosophy: Logic aids in constructing coherent arguments and analyzing philosophical propositions critically.

6. Conclusion

Mastering logic is a transformative skill that enhances critical thinking, problem-solving, and effective communication. By understanding the principles of logical reasoning and applying them diligently, individuals can navigate complex issues with clarity and precision.

Explore More on @nikshahxai

Personal Development & Education

Philosophy, Ethics & Society

Technology & Innovation

Life Sciences & Health

About the Authors

For more information about Nik Shah's digital presence, as well as insights from contributing authors such as Nanthaphon Yingyongsuk, Sean Shah, Gulab Mirchandani, Darshan Shah, Kranti Shah, John DeMinico, Rajeev Chabria, Francis Wesley, Sony Shah, Dilip Mirchandani, Rushil Shah, Nattanai Yingyongsuk, Subun Yingyongsuk, Theeraphat Yingyongsuk, and Saksid Yingyongsuk, click here to explore further.

References

Websites

Shah, N. (2025). Science and Engineering. Wix Studio. Retrieved from https://nikshahxai.wixstudio.com/nikhil/nik-shah-science-and-engineering-wix-studio

Shah, N. (2025). Science & Engineering. nikhil.blog. Retrieved from https://nikhil.blog/nik-shah-science-engineering-nikhil-blog-2/

Books

Shah, S. (2025). Mastering Conditional Logic: The Art of Prioritization and Perfect Rationale. https://www.alibris.com/Mastering-Conditional-Logic-The-Art-of-Prioritization-and-Perfect-Rationale-Sean-Shah/book/55618904. Retrieved from https://www.alibris.com/Mastering-Conditional-Logic-The-Art-of-Prioritization-and-Perfect-Rationale-Sean-Shah/book/55618904

Shah, S. (2025). Mastering Causal Reasoning: Unveiling the Power of Cause and Effect. https://bookshop.org/p/books/mastering-causal-reasoning-unveiling-the-power-of-cause-and-effect-rushil-shah/22121317. Retrieved from https://bookshop.org/p/books/mastering-causal-reasoning-unveiling-the-power-of-cause-and-effect-rushil-shah/22121317

Shah, S. (2025). Mastering Conditional Logic: The Art of Prioritization and Perfect Rationale. Bol.com. Retrieved from www.bol.com/nl/nl/p/mastering-conditional-logic/9300000198483136/

#xai #nik shah #artificial intelligence #nikhil pankaj shah #nikhil shah #grok #claude #gemini #watson #chatgpt

2 notes · View notes

lboogie1906 · 9 months ago

Text

Viola (Tyler) Goings (August 29, 1899 - March 9, 1983) was born in Flushing, Ohio. She is one of the founders of Zeta Phi Beta Sorority established on the college campus of Howard University, and a lifelong member of the organization. “The Five Pearls,” was the famous nickname of the founding Sorors of Zeta Phi Beta Sorority. On completion of her high school education, she became a co-ed at Howard University. After graduating from Howard University with a teaching degree in math, she taught in Smithville, North Carolina, and accepted the position to teach at the Annapolis High School in Maryland. She advanced her career and became an Assistant Principal at the Cambridge High School in Cambridge, Maryland. She married Fred Goings and moved to Springfield Ohio, to continue pursuing her career as an educator. She taught mathematics and English for many years until her retirement. Being a career woman did not interfere with the love and nature bestowed upon her two sons and two daughters and active participation in community affairs. Words of reflection: “There is a Zeta in a girl regardless of race, creed, or color, who has high standards of principles, a good scholarly average, and an active interest in all things. She is the sister of Zeta Phi Beta founder Myrtle Tyler Faithful.

In January 2019, her daughter, Wynona Kidd was inducted into the sorority, making her the oldest living descendant of the organization’s five founding members. #africanhistory365 #africanexcellence #zetaphibeta

1 note · View note

blueheartbookclub · 1 year ago

Text

Delving into the Depths of Thought: A Review of "The Problems of Philosophy" by Bertrand Russell

Bertrand Russell's "The Problems of Philosophy" stands as a timeless exploration of some of the most fundamental questions that have puzzled humanity for centuries. In this concise yet profound work, Russell embarks on a journey to unravel the mysteries of existence, knowledge, and reality, offering readers a thought-provoking introduction to the field of philosophy.

At the heart of Russell's inquiry lies the quest for knowledge and understanding. Through clear and accessible prose, he tackles age-old questions such as the nature of reality, the existence of an external world, and the limits of human perception. Drawing on insights from logic, mathematics, and the natural sciences, Russell challenges readers to critically examine their assumptions and beliefs, encouraging them to engage in rational inquiry and intellectual curiosity.

One of the key strengths of "The Problems of Philosophy" is Russell's ability to distill complex philosophical concepts into digestible and engaging discussions. Whether discussing the nature of space and time, the concept of truth, or the problem of induction, Russell presents ideas with clarity and precision, making them accessible to readers of all backgrounds. His use of concrete examples and thought experiments helps to illuminate abstract concepts, allowing readers to grasp the underlying principles more easily.

Moreover, Russell's work is not merely an intellectual exercise but also a call to action. Throughout the book, he emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and skepticism, urging readers to question authority and think for themselves. By encouraging a spirit of open-minded inquiry, Russell empowers readers to challenge received wisdom and explore alternative perspectives, fostering intellectual independence and freedom of thought.

In addition to its philosophical insights, "The Problems of Philosophy" also offers a historical perspective on the development of philosophical thought. Russell traces the evolution of philosophical ideas from ancient times to the modern era, highlighting key figures and movements that have shaped the discipline. By situating philosophical problems within their historical context, Russell provides readers with a deeper appreciation for the ongoing dialogue that has characterized philosophical inquiry throughout history.

Overall, "The Problems of Philosophy" is a timeless classic that continues to inspire and provoke readers with its profound insights and thought-provoking questions. Russell's lucid prose, rigorous analysis, and commitment to intellectual honesty make this book a must-read for anyone interested in philosophy, logic, or the pursuit of knowledge. In a world filled with uncertainty and confusion, Russell's work serves as a beacon of clarity and reason, guiding readers on a journey of philosophical discovery and self-reflection.

Bertrand Russell's "The Problems of Philosophy" is available in Amazon in paperback 12.99$ and hardcover 18.99$ editions.

Number of pages: 146

Language: English

Rating: 9/10

Link of the book!

Review By: King's Cat

3 notes · View notes

literaturereviewhelp · 21 days ago

Text

The worksheet presented below is targeted as describing two educational frameworks of perennials and positivism. Its analysis will be beneficial for understanding the key principles as well as the way in which both frameworks are used in education and can be used in the nursing curriculum. Perennialism – A Traditional Educational Framework Positivism – A Modern Educational Framework Background and meaning Defined as a belief that “certain universal truths or ideas exist at all times and that the level of existence that man attains is determined by his attention or inattention, to these eternal principles” (Jent, 2003, p. 3). Perennialism is often regarded as an ideal philosophical theory that captures the entire framework of human reason, as it is the philosophy that can be applied to any kind of education and any kind of school. Therefore, perennials are a traditional educational framework that is everlasting and ever-growing (Dible, 2010, p. 175). Philosophical framework, which states that the attained knowledge comes from the natural phenomena and the relations that exist within such phenomena. Contrary to the naturalistic frameworks, positivism states that reality is external from people, and that information should be assessed analytically and mathematically (Uzun, 2011, p. 338). Founders This philosophical system dates back to Aristotle and Plato while the modern proponents of this view are Adler, Hutchins, and Maritain. Positivism was largely advocated by Karl Popper (post-positivism) and Francis Bacon (inductive reasoning). The term positivism itself was created by the French philosopher and founder of positivism, Auguste Comte, whose view created a ground for positivism, a framework suggesting that any kind of genuine knowledge is attained from sensory experiences that can only be improved through experiments or observations (Mack, 2010, p. 6). How is currently used Perennialism implies the same kind of education for everyone since it has direct connections to the Paidea Proposal established by Adler. He stated that all children can learn, that learning and education are processes that last the entire life, and that learning is accomplished through the effective interactions between a student and a teacher. Nowadays perennialism is used as a primary framework for teaching since education is targeted at giving knowledge to all children. According to the article by Johnson & Onwuegbuzie (2004), positivism relates to either confirmation or falsification of the phenomena and that such procedures are usually implemented in an objective manner (p. 15). Therefore, positivism is applied in modern education in terms of studying social phenomena that can be experienced and evaluated through logical thinking. How each can be used in the nursing curriculum It can be applied in nursing the same way as in all institutions, establishing guiding principles for the effective education of nursing students regardless of their capabilities. In nursing, positivism can be used in teaching the benefits of social observations that are to be regarded as separate entities similar to the ways physicists interpret the phenomena of the physical sphere. Why the student would choose this framework This philosophy can be chosen due to its universal nature and the opposition towards limits and differentiation since education should not be something that is limited to specific rules. Education and learning are ongoing processes that require interactions and sharing of knowledge. This educational framework can be chosen for its objectivism and preciseness since such characteristics can be easily applied in studying and investigating real-life phenomena. How they can be utilized in the workplace Used to establish a unified approach to all participants of the workplace that requires the same treatment for everybody. Used to observe phenomena related to any workplace situations and then used for logical analysis. To conclude, perennials and positivism are frameworks different not only in their definitions but in the nature of their application. While perennials is a general approach that implies equal treatment for all participants of the educational process, positivism is specifically targeted at promoting logical thinking and sensory experiences when it comes to education. References Dible, R. (2010). The philosophy of mysticism: Perennialism and constructivism. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 1(2), 173-183. Jent, G. (2003). Perennialism. Torch Trinity Journal, 6, 3-21. Johnson, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. Mack, L. (2010). The philosophical underpinnings of educational research. Polyglossia, 19, 5-11. Uzun, U. (2011) What is your educational philosophy? Modern and postmodern approaches to foreign language education. SSLLT, 2(3), 333-348. Read the full article

0 notes

nshah01801 · 24 days ago

Text

Mastering Reasoning and Philosophy: A Comprehensive Guide by Nik Shah

In a world where logical reasoning and critical thinking are essential for navigating complex decisions and solving intricate problems, mastering various forms of reasoning is key to success. Whether it's understanding causal relationships, perfecting deductive and inductive thought, or exploring metaphysical concepts, each area of reasoning offers unique tools for better decision-making and innovation. This article explores these different forms of reasoning with insights from experts like Nik Shah, Sean Shah, Rajeev Chabria, and others. Through their teachings, readers will gain an understanding of how to harness logic and reasoning to improve personal and professional growth.

Mastering Causal Reasoning: Unveiling the Power of Cause and Effect https://www.sanmin.com.tw/product/index/013811718

Causal reasoning is the ability to understand and establish relationships between cause and effect. "Mastering Causal Reasoning" offers a deep dive into this fundamental type of reasoning, explaining how identifying causal links can enhance decision-making, problem-solving, and innovation. Rushil Shah and Nik Shah explore how causal reasoning impacts both everyday life and scientific discovery, helping readers connect dots between actions and outcomes. By understanding causal relationships, readers can better predict results and create more effective strategies in both personal and professional contexts. This book provides the tools needed to improve reasoning and enhance critical thinking abilities.

Deductive Mastery: The Art of Logical Thought https://www.saxo.com/dk/deductive-mastery-the-art-of-logical-thought_bog_9798303122321

Deductive reasoning is one of the most powerful forms of logic. It allows us to move from general principles to specific conclusions with certainty. In "Deductive Mastery," Nik Shah provides readers with a systematic approach to mastering deductive reasoning. The book covers various types of deductive arguments, helping readers understand how to apply this form of logic to solve problems and improve decision-making. With contributions from Darshan Shah and Rajeev Chabria, the book offers insights into how deductive reasoning is used across different fields, from mathematics to philosophy, providing practical applications for readers looking to enhance their logical thinking skills.

Mastering Analogical Reasoning: Unlocking the Power of Comparison for Problem Solving and Innovation https://www.saxo.com/dk/mastering-analogical-reasoning-unlocking-the-power-of-comparison-for-problem-solving-and-innovation_bog_9798303125599

Analogical reasoning is the process of using comparisons to solve problems and make decisions. "Mastering Analogical Reasoning" explores how recognizing similarities between different situations can lead to innovative solutions. Rushil Shah, Sony Shah, and Nik Shah discuss how analogical reasoning is not just about finding similarities but also about creatively applying insights from one domain to another. The book offers practical examples of analogical reasoning in action, helping readers improve their ability to think outside the box, solve problems more effectively, and innovate in various fields.

Mastering Conditional Logic: The Art of Prioritization and Perfect Rationale https://www.saxo.com/dk/mastering-conditional-logic-the-art-of-prioritization-and-perfect-rationale_bog_9798301601408

Conditional logic helps individuals assess situations based on "if-then" scenarios, which is crucial for prioritizing tasks and making reasoned decisions. In "Mastering Conditional Logic," Sean Shah and Nik Shah explore the nuances of conditional reasoning and its importance in everyday decision-making. This book teaches readers how to prioritize actions and evaluate options systematically, enabling them to make well-reasoned decisions. With contributions from experts like John DeMinico, readers gain a deeper understanding of how conditional logic can streamline thought processes and lead to better decision outcomes.

Mastering Inferences and Discernment: Harnessing Logical Reasoning and Intuitive Judgment https://www.saxo.com/dk/mastering-inferences-and-discernment-harnessing-logical-reasoning-and-intuitive-judgment_bog_9798303011113

The ability to make sound inferences and discern the right course of action is a hallmark of effective decision-making. "Mastering Inferences and Discernment" by Sony Shah explores how to combine logical reasoning with intuitive judgment. This book teaches readers how to draw meaningful conclusions based on available evidence while trusting their instincts in uncertain situations. Nik Shah’s insights further refine the process of discernment, helping readers develop the ability to make judgments quickly and accurately. This skill is essential for navigating complex situations and making informed decisions with confidence.

Mastering Literal & Non-Literal Reasoning https://www.saxo.com/dk/mastering-literal-non-literal_bog_9798343073355

"Mastering Literal & Non-Literal Reasoning" explores the distinction between literal reasoning, which is based on direct facts, and non-literal reasoning, which involves interpreting figures of speech, metaphors, and symbolism. This book, authored by Nik Shah, offers readers a comprehensive understanding of how to think both literally and figuratively, making it easier to navigate complex arguments and diverse perspectives. With contributions from Gulab Mirchandani and Pory Yingyongsuk, the book discusses how mastering both types of reasoning can improve communication, problem-solving, and creative thinking.

Mastering Metaphysical Objects: Navigating the Invisible Forces That Shape Our Reality https://www.saxo.com/dk/mastering-metaphysical-objects-navigating-the-invisible-forces-that-shape-our-reality_bog_9798303675698

Metaphysical reasoning helps us understand the invisible forces that shape our world, such as consciousness, ethics, and the nature of existence. "Mastering Metaphysical Objects" delves into the deeper philosophical questions surrounding reality and perception. Nik Shah and his collaborators, including Darshan Shah and Francis Wesley, explore how metaphysical concepts impact our understanding of the universe and our place in it. This book offers a fresh perspective on how to think about the intangible forces that govern our lives, encouraging readers to challenge conventional thinking and explore new avenues of intellectual exploration.

Mastering Reasoning: Unlocking the Power of Deductive, Inductive, Abductive, Analogical, and Critical Thinking https://www.saxo.com/dk/mastering-reasoning-unlocking-the-power-of-deductive-inductive-abductive-analogical-and-critical-thi_bog_9798303010253

"Mastering Reasoning" provides an overview of the different types of reasoning used in everyday decision-making, from deductive and inductive reasoning to critical and analogical thinking. Nik Shah, along with Rajeev Chabria, explores the importance of understanding these diverse reasoning techniques in order to enhance problem-solving abilities and improve decision-making skills. This book offers practical exercises and examples to help readers develop their reasoning skills in various contexts. Whether you are solving complex problems, navigating difficult decisions, or simply looking to think more clearly, this book provides the foundational tools for mastering reasoning.

Mastering the Art of Inductive Reasoning https://www.saxo.com/dk/mastering-the-art-of-inductive-reasoning_bog_9798303123458

Inductive reasoning is the process of drawing general conclusions from specific observations. "Mastering the Art of Inductive Reasoning" by Nik Shah provides a step-by-step guide to improving this skill, which is essential for decision-making and problem-solving. The book discusses how to identify patterns, make predictions, and apply inductive reasoning in a variety of situations. With contributions from Sony Shah, readers will also learn how to avoid common pitfalls in inductive reasoning and enhance their ability to think critically and creatively.

Mastering Unconditional Logic: A Journey Through Rationality and Truth https://www.saxo.com/dk/mastering-unconditional-logic-a-journey-through-rationality-and-truth_bog_9798303564282

Unconditional logic is based on principles that hold true under all circumstances. "Mastering Unconditional Logic" by Rushil Shah and Nik Shah explores the foundations of this type of reasoning, which is essential for developing a deep understanding of rationality and truth. The book discusses how to apply unconditional logic to solve problems, make sound judgments, and achieve clarity in decision-making. By mastering this form of reasoning, readers can gain the ability to navigate complex situations with confidence, applying universal truths to make more informed choices.

Conclusion

Mastering the various forms of logical reasoning, from deductive and inductive reasoning to metaphysical thinking, can significantly improve one’s ability to think critically, solve problems, and make well-reasoned decisions. Through the works of Nik Shah, Rushil Shah, Sean Shah, and others, this guide provides valuable insights into enhancing logical thinking skills and applying them in diverse situations. By learning to harness the power of logic, reasoning, and philosophical inquiry, readers can unlock new avenues for personal and intellectual growth, leading to better decision-making and a deeper understanding of the world.

Keep Reading

Sustainability & Environmental Impact

Spirituality & Consciousness

Social Dynamics & Relationships

Mindset & Personal Growth

Self-Improvement & Mastery

Leadership & Influence

Psychology & Emotional Intelligence

Ethics & Morality

Artificial Intelligence & Technology

Health & Wellness

Scientific Exploration & Innovation

Medical Mastery & Disease Prevention

Fitness & Strength Training

Neuroscience & Brain Function

Artificial Intelligence & Technology

Financial Mastery & Entrepreneurship

Digital Presence

Topics Overview

@nshah01801

#nikhilshah #nikplus #nikshah #architecture #books & libraries #artificial intelligence #business #trending #chatgpt #claude

0 notes