#sapri

[rodolfosabelli]

[messinacalcio]

Maria Marotta di Sapri è l'arbitro designato per Messina-Virtus Francavilla

Maria Marotta di Sapri è l’arbitro designato per Messina-Virtus Francavilla

Maria Marotta della sezione di Sapri è l’arbitro designato per il match Messina-Virtus Francavilla valevole per la seconda giornata del girone di ritorno del campionato di serie C. Assistenti: Nicolò Moroni di Treviglio. Quarto ufficiale: Mario Saia di Palermo. [themoneytizer id=”16247-28″] [themoneytizer id=”16247-16″]  

[gregor-samsung]

“ Che cosa è l'anarchia? È la conseguenza estrema del liberalismo, e si basa soprattutto su due concetti: sulla credenza che gli uomini abbiano una tendenza naturale a lavorare, a produrre, ad associarsi, e sull'altra credenza che gli uomini siano guastati dalle leggi. Queste, in certa guisa, rappresentano un male, poiché sono la violenza contro l'ordine naturale delle cose. Come tutte le dottrine estreme, anche l'anarchia si basa sull'ottimismo; ma appunto per questo ha un fascino di attrazione sulle anime semplici e sugli spiriti indocili. Essa trascina gl'ingenui e i violenti. Quello che è stato chiamato più tardi il materialismo storico, la concezione marxistica della storia è chiaramente tracciata nell'opera di Pisacane, il quale riattaccava i fatti politici ai fenomeni della produzione. Alcuni brani della sua opera sembrano scritti ora, tanta é la modernità che l'ispira. « Tutte le leggi, tutte le riforme, eziandio quelle in apparenza popolari, favoriscono solamente la classe ricca e esulta, imperocché le istituzioni sociali, per la loro natura, volgono tutte in suo vantaggio. Voi plebe, allorché crederete avvicinarvi alla mèta, ne andrete invece più lontano. Voi lavorate, gli oziosi gioiscono; voi producete, gli oziosi dissipano; voi combattete ed essi godono la libertà. Il suffragio universale è un inganno. Come il vostro voto può esser libero, se la vostra esistenza dipende dal salario del padrone, dalle concessioni del proprietario? Voi indubbiamente voterete costretti dal bisogno come quelli vorranno. Come il vostro voto può esser giusto, se la miseria vi condanna a perpetua ignoranza e vi toglie ogni abilità per giudicare degli uomini e dei loro concetti? ». Se la rivoluzione fosse riescita vincitrice, Pisacane avea un piano per abolire la proprietà privata, e trasformarla in proprietà comune; abolire lo Stato e andare incontro a una specie di comunismo della produzione. Poi che era fuori della realtà, non vedeva e non sentiva tutte le difficoltà che la natura delle cose opponeva a tutti i suoi piani; come ogni anarchico egli vedeva il male non già nella natura e nelle difficoltà limitatrici inerenti all'anima umana, ma nella volontà degli uomini: uno sforzo di una minoranza audace parea a lui dovesse bastare a tutto. Pure come l'errore ha il fascino e l'illusione ha le dita di rose, alcune pagine di Pisacane non si rileggono né meno adesso senza commozione. “

---------

Brano tratto dal saggio breve Eroi (1898) raccolto in:

Francesco Saverio Nitti, Eroi e briganti, Edizioni Osanna (collana Biblioteca Federiciana n° 3), Venosa (PZ), 1987¹; pp. 20-21.

[festaventurine]

joumae saori is so funny bcos the first time you're introduced to her is this very cunning arius squad leader who fooled mika for arius' own gain (at least from mika's pov) and had led an almost successful terrorist attack against trinity and gehenna if it wasn't for sensei

then she turned a new leaf, got some honest work, and got foolishly scammed at least three times.

[foxeia]

Anastasia Sapri

[aigiornileggeri]

La differenza tra Sapri e casa dei miei:

Voglio il mare.

[muffincupv]

I think it’s super interesting how the patriarchy is so embedded into our culture that our modern language helps push patriarchal values.

I’ve done a bit of personal research into this topic and thought I would share it here

(Note this was a quick highschool project so it’s not super in-depth but I would love other people’s thoughts on it) sorry this is long :)

I’m currently taking a class in my high school where we are talking about gender, feminism, sexuality, and the patriarchy. Specifically how the patriarchy is imbedded in our day to day lives and how it’s effects intersect with other issues such as racism, homophobia, classism, etc.

I looked into the English language and linguistic relativity.

An Analysis of Sexism in English

In the English lexicon, one of the most obvious evidences of sexism is the affixes which lead to a view of women as a deviation from men. This is commonly seen with suffixes such as -ess or -ette.

Example: Actor “ a person who plays the part of a character in a movie or play”, when attached to a feminine suffix –ess, becomes actress with the meaning of “ woman with profession similar to those of actor”. ← othering of women as if Femininity is inherently not human. Why is actor “a person” while Actress is “A woman” why make the distinction?

Other examples include:

Masculine Feminine

ambassador ambassadress

duke duchess

prince princess

poet poetess

Sometimes adding the suffix -ett or -ess completely changes the meaning and value of the word. (Govenor vs Goveness- one rules a country the other teaches children in their homes).

Why does this matter?

We need to considered how language is intimately tied to behavior, knowledge, and culture. Sapri-Whorf Hypothesis, more commonly known as linguistic relativity is the theory that a person's language changes how they perceive the world around them. Since its conception, this theory has been widely debated. However, most people believe the theory, it's debated how much language impacts our culture, but the idea that it has an impact is backed up by many studies.

Studies include Colour study, how Russian speakers could identify colors faster than English speakers + How German speakers lost that ability after years of speaking English. Note that Russian and German both have more labels for colors, differing them from English speakers.

How has our language accidentally othered femininity?

The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men's sexual orientation from read speech.

This studies how people view sexual orientation based on their speech and voice. They found that gay men were easier to identify than lesbians even though they both changed their speech. Men would raise their voice, feminine while women would lower theirs to be more masculine. This shows how femininity is easier to identify because we see it as an “other” so when women show more masculine traits we gloss over it because we see it as more “normal”.

This is only one example that shines light on how we don’t even notice these biases. There are likely hundreds of more that we can't even begin to imagine because it is so ingrained in our day-to-day life, our culture, and our society.

Impact/intersect

Misogyny and Homophobia: Patriarchy, gender policing, and the Male Gaze

It’s hard to tell which came first. Did our black and white language accidentally push an anti feminine belief or has misogyny and the patriarchy impacted our day to day speech? Either way at this point it’s more of a cycle constantly pushing patriarchal values.

Misogyny is not only the act of hating women but hating anything seen as “feminine”. When it comes to homophobia gay men and lesbian women are treated differently. Homosexual men tend to suffer discrimination and abuse because they don’t fit what is considered “manly” This is why people say things like “that's so gay” as an insult. Men not adhering to masculinity or showing more feminine traits are discouraged.

On the other hand, lesbians get more hate due to fetishization and breaking the patriarchy. Many queer women in WLW presenting relationships have experienced comments including “Can I get in on that” or “I can join in if you want a threesome”. Interestingly, “butch” women and others who present more masculine are “treated with fear and contempt for trying to encroach on traditionally male territory and not conforming to normative ideals of female beauty” (Williamson, 7).

Obviously there’s more impacts that have resulted however I just focused on homophobia as an example of intersectionality. If you have any other examples feel free to add on and share them.

Anyways thanks for listening to my rant I just thought it was interesting :)

[all-my-doubts]

Sapri (Sa)

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: Leor Sapri

Published: Dec 15, 2023

The core question in lawsuits over state-level age restrictions on “gender-affirming care” or former patients suing their providers for fraud or malpractice is whether sex-trait modification is an evidence-based and ethical medical practice. Recognizing the limits of their own knowledge on such matters, judges have turned to expert witnesses to help them understand the key issues at play. But since both sides in these legal contests appoint expert witnesses to back their claims (typically medical doctors and mental-health professionals), judges must determine which are more credible.

A recent exchange between Moti Gorin, an associate professor of philosophy and bioethicist at Colorado State University, and Alejandra Caraballo, a transgender activist and cyberlaw instructor at Harvard Law School, provides crucial insight into how these questions bear on the outcome of lawsuits over gender medicine. In a paper titled “The Anti-Transgender Medical Expert Industry,” published earlier this year in the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Caraballo argues that judges should disregard the opinions of medical professionals who testify on behalf of states seeking to restrict “gender-affirming care.” In a newly published letter to the editor in the same journal, Gorin shows the fatal flaws in Caraballo’s arguments. (The journal also gave Caraballo the chance to respond to Gorin.)

Caraballo devotes considerable space to maligning experts and organizations skeptical or critical of “gender-affirming care” as being driven by “anti-transgender” animus. As Gorin points out, these are

serious allegations, directed at named entities and individuals, and presented not on a social media platform or in the opening statement of an attorney engaged in courtroom advocacy but in the pages of a peer-reviewed, academic journal. One should therefore expect strong evidence in support of such allegations, in keeping with the usual norms of academic publishing. Those norms require, inter alia, that easily-verifiable factual claims be true, that accurate and otherwise adequate citations be provided, that the author avoid unnecessarily inflammatory language, and so on.

Caraballo provides zero evidence for these accusations. For example, Caraballo describes Stephen Levine, a professor of psychiatry at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine with five decades of clinical experience treating gender dysphoric patients, as “one of the most prolific anti-transgender medical expert [sic] in the country” and claims that he “has not published peer-reviewed research in the relevant field.” As Gorin observes, however, “It is easy to confirm that this claim is plainly false.” Levine, who chaired the HBIGDA’s (now WPATH) Fifth Standards of Care and served on the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM-IV Subcommittee on Gender Identity Disorders, has many peer-reviewed publications in the field, including landmark papers like “The Myth of ‘Reliable Research’” that touch directly on the evidence base for pediatric gender medicine.

Gorin provides other examples of blatant falsehoods in Caraballo’s paper, raising the question of how the Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics could allow such defamatory statements to be made in its pages without even minimal corroboration. As Gorin later explained on X, academic publishing relies on a certain degree of trust. Editors and reviewers assume that scholars will not, for instance, blatantly mischaracterize sources they cite, as Caraballo appears to have done. Recently, a prominent physician argued that the scandal of pediatric “gender-affirming care” was made possible due to a “broken chain of trust” within the medical and scientific establishment, with activist clinicians and researchers exploiting the chains of trust built up over generations by their professional forebearers. That physician is Stephen Levine.

No less embarrassing for Caraballo than the many factual errors in the original article is Caraballo’s apparent misunderstanding of the rules of evidence in adjudication. Here, Gorin takes Caraballo to task on the author's own turf and shows a superior grasp of the issues.

First, some context. Courts are generally a bad forum in which to settle scientific debates. Among other problems, judges are not subject-area experts and have little time to master the nuances of scientific controversies; they must inevitably decide between competing claims of subject-area experts. By definition, such contests require non-experts to substitute their own judgment for that of at least one expert—a scenario that can easily undermine the judge’s credibility in the eyes of scientific critics.

In the 1923 case Frye v. United States, the D.C. Court of Appeals opined that it was hard to determine when a “scientific principle or discovery crosses the line between the experimental and demonstrable stages,” and that, in order to do so, judges should consider whether a scientific principle or discovery has “gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.”

In 1975, Congress adopted the Federal Rules of Evidence. Rule 702 states, “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.” In the 1993 case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the Supreme Court held that Rule 702 supersedes the Frye test of “general acceptance." The Court laid out four criteria to guide judges in their assessment of the reliability of expert testimony:

1. The expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; 2. The testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; 3. The testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and 4. The expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.

It’s easy to see how these doctrinal issues bear directly on the current debate over “gender-affirming care.” When advocates of gender-affirming care maintain that these controversial procedures are evidence-based, they cite the consensus of professional medical associations. Critics point out that this consensus is manufactured and enforced through suppression of contrary viewpoints. They point out that consensus-based medicine is not necessarily evidence-based medicine.

Caraballo’s position is that expert testimony from the likes of Levine and the psychologist James Cantor—author of the definitive, peer-reviewed fact-check of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ policy statement on “gender-affirming care”—should be discounted on the grounds that Levine and Cantor do not directly provide “gender-affirming” medical treatments to minors and that they operate outside the consensus of U.S. medical associations.

Regarding the first claim, if clinicians do not approve minors for puberty suppression, cross-sex hormones, or surgeries, that might be because they don’t believe that these interventions are evidence-based and ethical. Moreover, as Cantor has explained in expert witness testimony, the expertise of clinicians is different from that of scientists. The clinician’s expertise “regards applying general principles to the care of an individual patient and the unique features of that case.” The scientist’s expertise “is the reverse, accumulating information about many individual cases and identifying the generalizable principles that may be applied to all cases.” Accordingly, Cantor writes, “In legal matters, the most familiar situation pertains to whether a given clinician correctly employed relevant clinical standards. Often, it is other clinicians who practice in that field who will be best equipped to speak to that question. When it is the clinical standards that are themselves in question, however, it is the experts in the assessment of scientific studies who are the relevant experts.” For good reason, Caraballo’s criterion—that a doctor must practice a type of intervention in order to qualify as an expert in the evidence base for that intervention—is neither mentioned nor implied in the Daubert standards.

Not just that, but clinicians who practice “gender-affirming care” are likely to find themselves in intellectual, professional, and financial conflicts of interest, which may produce confirmation bias and impair their ability to dispassionately assess the evidence for the care they provide.

In short, Caraballo’s characterization of who counts as an expert is a classic example of the No True Scotsman fallacy. Caraballo conveniently defines as “experts” only those who practice, and by implication agree with, “gender-affirming care” for kids. It would be as if we agreed to define only clinicians who practice lobotomy as “experts” on whether lobotomy is an evidence-based practice.

As for Caraballo’s second point, about “anti-transgender” experts being outside the consensus in the field, Gorin points out that, under Daubert, this should not disqualify the opinions of these experts. To recall, the court in Daubert explicitlyrejected the “general acceptance” standard in Frye as a prerequisite for determining the reliability of testimony. “It is easy to see why ‘general acceptance’ is too strict a requirement,” writes Gorin. “It would exclude from the start expert testimony that, despite being inconsistent with generally-held opinion or consensus, proves to be consistent with the truth.” Commitment to science means above all commitment to the scientific method. As the Court put it in Daubert, “The focus . . . must be solely on principles and methodology, not on the conclusions they generate.”

Caraballo’s typo-riddled response to Gorin’s criticism complains that he is “hyper fixat[ed] on minor errors rather than the broader argument.” (In fact, Gorin’s examples of Caraballo’s factual errors go to the heart of Caraballo’s thesis that the experts in question are driven by animus rather than good-faith disagreement with the prevailing consensus.) Caraballo then resorts to more mudslinging and name-calling, for instance characterizing Levine as a “conversion therapist” because he uses exploratory therapy for his pediatric patients rather than automatically “affirming” their self-diagnosed “gender identity” as permanent and eligible for hormonal treatments. To support the accusation, Caraballo cites a paper by a transgender bioethicist who opposes “gatekeeping” for drugs and surgeries on the grounds that teenagers should have the right to turn their bodies into “gendered art pieces.”

Caraballo then continues to impugn the motives of “anti-transgender” expert witnesses by claiming that they are paid for their work—an unremarkable observation and one that conveniently ignores the fact that experts on the other side are also paid. For example, Jack Turban is paid up to $400 per hour to testify against state age-restriction laws. (It was money well spent: Turban revealed that he does not understand the basics of evidence-based medicine.)

Speaking of ulterior motives: in a footnote, Caraballo discloses that “these witnesses provided a report that impacted my ability to access care when I visit family in Florida. I can no longer obtain refills there legally due to restrictions placed on adult care. Additionally, my care in Massachusetts has been severely affected by the large influx of trans people fleeing states such as Florida. While this may be an elective academic indulgence for Gorin, this affects my healthcare directly.”

Caraballo ends by wondering, “Why should gender affirming care be considered differently where non-practitioners of a field testify on the relevant standards, they themselves do not practice?”

The answer is simple: those who provide irreversible, sterilizing, and often disfiguring “treatments” to kids on the belief that these young people were “born in the wrong body” are ideologues who need to be reined in by their more professional colleagues. For Caraballo, apparently, only blood-letters should testify on the merits of blood-letting.

==

When activists get desperate, their lies get more egregious.

Caraballo needs to return his law degree. He's dangerously unqualified.

[t-annhauser]

Milano Centrale-Paola

Per una felice congiunzione astrale dei sistemi di prenotazione online avevamo trovato un posto in business sul Freccia a un prezzo relativamente conveniente. Fino a Firenze il vagone è popolato dai consueti turisti tedeschi in Grand Tour, ormai un cliché, abbigliati in qualsiasi condizione meteo come se andassero in gita fuori porta a Fregene, le donne generalmente tutte scosciate, moderne veneri di Milo, gli uomini piuttosto legnosetti nei loro pantaloncini comprati su Asos (i bambini di un biondo abbacinante, giallopaglierini). Bonus track: tre giulive signore tedesche di mezza età, poi scese a Roma, che non hanno mai smesso di parlare un minuto intavolando un'appassionata discussione su "Protein Trink" ed "Enercy Trink" (a questo punto mi sono convinto che "trincare" sia voce di origine germanica). Le abbiamo sentite distintamente pronunciare Reggio Calabria "Reccio Kolapria". Dopo Roma è cambiata la fauna e il vagone si è riempito di manager della PA in camicia azzurrina e matteorenzianesche giacche sciancrate bleu, ai piedi mocassini leggeri coi fantasmini. Trafficavano per un po' su pagine di Excel sopra notebook con gli sfondi dei figli rispondendo professionalmente alle telefonate di lavoro (i colleghi si chiamano generalmente tutti "Maurizio"), poi si abbandonavano mollemente ai giochini online spizzicando annoiati le razioni del cestino di benvenuto: succo di frutta, crostino, brioche (da Roma in giù identificata come "cornetto") salata, un pollice quadrato di cioccolato nero e una bottiglietta d'acqua "vulcanica" da 25 ml. Dopo Salerno si aprivano i consueti paesaggi selvaggi e aspri che complici noia e stanchezza ci catapultavano immantinente in una specie di meriggio o miraggio di mezza estate popolato da ninfe e fauni bruscamente interrotto dalla stazione di Sapri. Sogno confessato di fare un giorno il trasbordo su un wagon lit a Villa San Giovanni prima che rovinino tutta la magia costruendo il modernissimo Ponte sullo Stretto.

[nardogranata]

Un Toro rabbioso torna alla vittoria. Barletta mai in partita.

NARDO' - BARLETTA 3-0

Scorers: 5' D'Anna, 27' Ceccarini, 89' Dambros rig.

NARDO' (3-5-2): Viola; Russo, Lanzolla, Gennari; Milli (60' Ciracì) Mariani (75' Gentile), Guadalupi, Ceccarini, Ingrosso (75' Urquiza); D'Anna (55' Dambros) Dammacco (80' Addae).

Reserve: Furnari, De Giorgi, Ciannamea, Melillo.

Coach: Nicola Ragno

BARLETTA (3-5-2): Sapri; Rizzo, Silvestri, Lobosco; Schelotto, Marconato, Marsili (57' Bramati), Padovano (65' Venanzio), Inguscio; Russo, Marilungo (62' Ngom).

Reserve: Provitolo, Sepe, Cafagna, Caputo, Lacassia, De Marino.

Coach: Di Maio (Ginestra squalificato)

Ammoniti: Marconato e Lobosco (B), Gennari e Gentile (N). Espulso: 11' Inguscio (B)

Arbitro: Gerardo Di Caruso di Viterbo

Assistenti: Luca Granata di Viterbo e Lorenzo D'alessandris di Frosinone.

Il Nardò centra la prima vittoria con una prestazione maiuscola. Grande aggressività, pressing alto e concretezza sotto porta. Per il Barletta non c'è stato scampo. 

Un Nardò inedito, schierato da Ragno con novità in ogni reparto. Inserito subito il nuovo arrivato Ingrosso, preferito a De Giorgi. Centrocampo totalmente ridisegnato con Guadalupi, Mariani e Ceccarini e per la prima volta i due ex brindisini D'Anna e Dammacco insieme a formare il tandem d'attacco. In panchina a sorpresa Dambros e Addae.

Nel Barletta lo squalificato Ginestra butta subito nella mischia il neo acquisto Marilungo ad affiancare Schelotto in attacco.

Il Nardò parte subito forte. Al 3' Dammacco impegna Sapri in una difficile respinta a terra.

Il pressing neretino schiaccia i barlettani nella loro area. Al 7' corner di Guadalupi e perfetta spizzata di testa di D'Anna che insacca sul palo lontano.

Due minuti dopo altro corner con colpo di testa di Gennari a stamparsi sulla traversa.

Trovato il goal il Nardò non molla la presa. All'11'  l'ex Inguscio trattiene D'Anna proiettato verso la porta. E' fallo, per l'arbitro è chiara occasione da goal quindi espulsione. 

La conseguente punizione battuta da Guadalupi va a frangersi sulla traversa.

Il Barletta si affida alle ripartenze di Schelotto. L'argentino si produce in pregevoli sgroppate cercando l'innesco di Marilungo. 

Al 25' i due si trovano. Cross di Schelotto e colpo di testa di Marilungo parato da Viola. E' l'unica azione pericolosa del barletta nel primo tempo. 

Al 30' azione tambureggiante del Toro che va al tiro con Dammacco, respinto da Sapri, con D'anna, respinto da un difensore e con Ceccarini che elude Schelotto e insacca con un gran tiro da appena dentro l'area.

Il Barletta non riesce ad abbozzare una reazione credibile, anzi è il Nardò a sfiorare il terzo goal con Dammacco al 40'. Fuori di un metro il diagonale in corsa della punta neretina.

Si chiude la prima frazione di gioco sul 2-0.

Nel secondo tempo il Barletta prova a riaprire il match con un piglio più intraprendente. Il Toro arretra il baricentro e innesca le ripartenze. Al 55' D'Anna impegna con un tiro in corsa Sapri che sventa respingendo coi piedi.

Al 60' pericolo per il Nardò. Stavolta la traversa è amica sulla conclusione di Bramati.

Ragno fiuta il pericolo e rinforza gli ormeggi. Dentro Urquiza per Ingrosso mentre in avanti energie fressche con Dambros al posto di D'Anna. Il Barletta risponde con Ngom per un Marilungo ancora a corto di condizione.

Al 75' occasione per il Barletta con tiro di Marconato provvidenzialmente deviato da Gennari e destinato in fondo al sacco.

All'87' Sante Russo atterra Jacopo Russo ed è rigore per il Nardò. Dal dischetto trasforma Dambros e chiude il match. Nel recupero c'è solo il tempo per una rovesciata di Schelotto, l'ultimo ad arrendersi, parata da Viola.

Finisce con un rotondo 3-0 per un Nardò che si lascia alle spalle una inaspettata crisi. Per il Barletta tanto da rivedere in chiave difensiva ma non manca la qualità per rialzarsi e proporsi come protagonista di questo campionato.

[straazdas]

My 50 most listened songs on Last Fm in July!

🗓️ June.

50. 🇦🇲 Ayd - Inga & Anush

49. 🇮🇱 Ode Le-Eli - Ofra Haza

48. 🇸🇪 Tattoo - Loreen

47. 🇺🇦 Sevdim Seni - Jamala

46. 🇺🇦 Kene aldı ğam beni - Jamala

45. 🇦🇲 Nazani - Inga & Anush

44. 🇦🇲 Don Hay - Inga & Anush

43. 🇦🇲 Cilicia - Inga & Anush

42. 🇦🇲 Aysor Ton E - Inga & Anush

41. 🇨🇭 Un cœur qui cogne - Gjon’s Tears

40. 🇪🇸 EAEA - Blanca Paloma

39. 🇫🇷 Je l'aime, je l'aime, je l'aime - Barbara Pravi

38. 🇦🇲 Yaylavor Yars - Inga & Anush

37. 🇦🇲 Tamzara - Inga & Anush

36. 🇦🇲 Khlpane - Inga & Anush

35. 🇲🇰 Circles - Andrea Koevska

34. 🇺🇦 Чому? - Jerry Heil, alyona alyona

33. 🇮🇱 Hi - Ofra Haza

32. 🇮🇱 A ‘Salk - Ofra Haza

31. 🇦🇲 Shoushiki Par - Inga & Anush

30. 🇦🇲 Joukhtak Mom - Inga & Anush

29. 🇦🇲 Aprelu April - Inga & Anush

28. 🇦🇲 Ruri - Inga & Anush

27. 🇲🇰 Close To The Sun - Andrea Koevska

26. 🇮🇱 Tzur mentati/Se'i yona/Sapri tama - Ofra Haza

25. 🇦🇲 Anguin Yar - Inga & Anush

24. 🇦🇲 Hamayak - Garik & Sona

23. 🇦🇲 Phetervarin Garune Vrazela - Inga & Anush

22. 🇺🇦 Noğay Beyi̇tleri̇ - Jamala

21. 🇦🇲 You Will Not Be Alone - Inga & Anush

20. 🇦🇲 Jan Jan - Inga & Anush

19. 🇦🇲 Dimak - Brunette

18. 🇲🇰 Telepatija - Andrea Koevska

17. 🇺🇦 Ціна правди - Jamala

16. 🇺🇦 Yosmam - Jamala

15. 🇺🇦 SOLO - Jamala

14. 🇦🇲 Qarsoun Karas - Inga & Anush

13. 🇳🇱 Azadî - Naaz

12. 🇦🇲 Dino - Inga & Anush

11. 🇺🇦 Крила - Jamala

10. 🇦🇲 Im Anune Hayastan E - Inga & Anush

09. 🇸🇮 oblike oblakov - zalagasper

08. 🇺🇦 Pencereden - Jamala

07. 🇺🇦 Dağlarniñ Yollari - Jamala

06. 🇺🇦 Rusalochki - Go_A

05. 🇮🇱 Im Nin' Alu [English Mix] - Ofra Haza

04. 🇦🇲 Harsanekan - Inga & Anush

03. 🇺🇦 Hem Seversi̇ñ, Hem Sevmezsi̇ñ - Jamala

02. 🇺🇦🇰🇿 Кохаю - Jamala, Jah Khalib

01. 🇦🇲 Tamzara [KOHAR version] - Inga & Anush

🌐 Countries:

🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 🇲🇰🇲🇰🇲🇰 🇰🇿 🇸🇮 🇳🇱 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇨🇭 🇸🇪

[iphisesque]

porcodiooooo siamo partiti da QUATTRO ORE e siamo ancora a sapri ci manca TUTTA la calabria. iddio cristo.

[nishicchikouchi]

It is only today that I discovered that I can listen to old voicelines that happened in archon quest. I have every version of the voice in genshin, and in my Main, I always use chinese ver because it futs the aesthetic. Which means I've always heard Xiao in chinese. Oh gosh please bless his CVA. He just sounds so AAAUUGHHH <3. So today, I go through the archive, with JP Ver. AND OH MY HOSH DID HE SOUND SO FAMILIAR IN JP. I was like, Sora? Ichijou Masaki? Kirito? Literally the first people that I thought of. I hope I'm not wrong XD. Imma search his JPVA in a sec.

Edit: I CHECKED IT. I WAS NOT WRONG MUAHAHAHAH. The JPVA for Xiao really is the same person that voiced Kirito.

ALSO, KAEYA? SAME VA AS KIBA? LOL NOW THAT IM INFORMED I WILL KEEP SEEING KIBA WHEN HE SPEAK HAHAH.

DILUC?!?!?! MY MAN HAS THE SAME VA AS MIKAELA OMGOMGOMG. AAAAAAAH

I already know that Venti is voiced by Ayumu because of that one song Ayumu sang I downloaded with Venti in the cover. Goodness, Ayumu's voice acting really is so amazing.

BUT KLEE! I am very shocked with her VA. She's the one who voice Hawk-chan SHXBSUSGSJSBAJB noooooo. Now whenever I see Klee I'll get reminded of Hawk lol.

I've never had Chongyun but always wanted him and now, PLEASE COME HOME. PLEASE THE WAY I SCREAMED when I found out that he has same jp va as William. Im dead. My voice is dead.

Zhongli is Hak. Actually, I think I prefer his Eng and CN ver better. He sound like an adolescent with his JP ngl.

Ayaya, already knew. Saori Hayami. Her voice is unique I just recognize her voice in characters she plays that I encounter. Like first meeting with her, oh this girl sound like Sapri Hayami. I love a lot of characters voiced by her.

Kazuha. Soma Yuki. ... Im dead. This only streghtened my resolve to save primos and fates for his rerun now. I am gettin you no matter what.

Ayato...I really like him and his character. Even his story quest which may seem like boring to others, I loved. (Man I love scheming characters too much—) His va also voiced Zeref! Ah, yes, Zeref.

Cyno, Sugawara and Yuuichirou. I definitely didn't recognize his voice. Goodness how are these JPVA so talented.

Natsu and Wanderer. Omy,,, NOW I SEE NATSU BEING A FLIRT AND WANDERER BEING A MUSCLE HEAD LOL HAHAHAHA

Alhaitham... President Horikita... .... .... .... ... this is why he's so hot.

Guys... Kaveh... Kyo... Megumi... I—

Wait, Teppei and Heizou has the same JPVA?

Il Dottore...Muzan...

[sapricorn]

Hi, I'm Sapri, a 21yo comics and illustration student from Czech Republic. I just started to really work on posting art on Twitter and now its dying so... Back to the big toe it is I guess.

I draw a lot of different things: comics and common artworks, original characters and fan arts, SFW and NSFW, paintings and linearts.... But in the future I really want to focus on the comics aspect of my work and improve the artstyle.

I have been working on creating a Patreon page where most of my art would be available for free but with the option of pledging for some benefits. Until that gets published, I guess I will be sticking around for a bit.

See ya 'round!

[spacetimewithstuartgary]

Mountains and Coastal Living Along the Gulf of Policastro

An astronaut aboard the International Space Station photographed towns along Italy’s Tyrrhenian Sea coastline. The image presents a mixture of hues ranging from light-colored waters of the Gulf of Policastro, an inlet of the Tyrrhenian Sea, to darker tones of the mountainous terrain of southwestern Italy.

The landscape of central and southern Italy is rugged due to the Apennines, a mountain range that extends down the country’s spine from central Italy to the coastline near the Gulf of Policastro. The proximity of the coastline and mountains results in a vast range of land elevations, from sea level near the coast to over 6,500 feet (2,000 meters) at the top of Monte Sirino.

Seasonal snow highlights the high-elevation mountaintops. The largest region of snow-covered peaks is within the Valle del Fiume Argentino nature reserve, a protected area within the broader Pollino National Park that extends east of this image.

Several large rivers, including the Noce and Lao rivers, flow through the region. The rivers carry rain, spring meltwater, and sediment from the Apennines toward the Gulf of Policastro. Sediment deposited into the shallow waters of the Tyrrhenian Sea creates the opaque white tones swirling in the water near the coast.

Several towns, including Sapri, Scalea, and Praia a Mare, cluster along the coastline and the foothills of the southern Apennines. The orange clay roofs, characteristic of the coastal towns, contrast with the green vegetation and the blue hues of the water. Sandy beaches, which appear as smooth zones along the coastline, attract tourists to the coastal towns.

Astronaut photograph ISS070-E-94260 was acquired on February 14, 2024, with a Nikon D5 digital camera using a focal length of 170 millimeters. It is provided by the ISS Crew Earth Observations Facility and the Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit, Johnson Space Center. The image was taken by a member of the Expedition 70 crew. The image has been cropped and enhanced to improve contrast, and lens artifacts have been removed. The International Space Station Program supports the laboratory as part of the ISS National Lab to help astronauts take pictures of Earth that will be of the greatest value to scientists and the public, and to make those images freely available on the Internet. Additional images taken by astronauts and cosmonauts can be viewed at the NASA/JSC Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth. Caption by Cadan Cummings, Jacobs, JETS II Contract at NASA-JSC.