Tbh very desperate for a cyberpunk mumu rn. PLEEEEASE. imagine the world building 😩
Like or message me if you’re interested 💛
If you know the premise of Cyberpunk 2077 great, if not, we can still discuss something!
2 notes
·
View notes
interesting how the overlapping relationships in design for living (film) are discussed by censors in what is deemed appropriate... i thought the "no sex" = platonic ending was weird. the ending lip kisses are a direct subversion of when earlier in the film they first brokered the agreement and gilda refused to kiss the boys on the lips, only their foreheads. it is a logical conclusion that forehead kiss = platonic, lip kiss = sexual; beginning = platonic, ending = sexual. so the "no sex" line makes no sense, unless outside forces are considered. maybe it was a cheap way to circumvent censorship of overlapping (polyamorous) relationships. i didnt think i was right until i read the prod code office (no indication who wrote this) saying the same thing: "In earlier sequence, script indicated that the three live together on a gentleman’s agreement of no sex, but the portrayal is very likely to indicate loose sex relationship which may become inadmissible under the Code." (jul 29, 1933) albeit they refer to the FIRST "no sex" agreement, which i hadnt considered because it made sense in the context of the film theyd try a platonic relationship first... in fact that is the late act 1 tension lol.
these overlapping relationships are talked about a few times by the film's censor, james wingate. it seemed like affections were fineee as long as she wasnt having sex with both of them. which is hilarious considering the whole point is they have overlapping affairs. 1. in a letter to paramount about the script, according to context i assume to be the morning-after scene when gilda cheats on cooper with march -- "Page G-8: We believe that the dialogue along here indicated too specifically that the girl has been having an affair with both men." (jun 19) in the same letter, wingate says that a key thing they have to be careful with is placing march in bedroom separate to gilda's, in order to avoid the implication she slept with him. 2. in a letter to hays -- "The basic story - three people who find, there is something more important in life than sex - should be satisfactory under the Code..." (jun 26) funniest thing you can say about a sex comedy.
there was also a related note from the BRITISH censors (feb 27, 1935 -- which is wayy later than when the film debuted in the uk mid 1934, so idk what the discrepancy is about), that reads: "Reel 1 -- Eliminate dialogue suggesting Tom and Gilda are already lovers" which in context suggests the scenes before the first agreement... my point is censors and filmmakers anticipated and reacted, so who's to say what IS subtext EVEN in a pre code film
6 notes
·
View notes
okay i’m not posting it for the sake of other people’s privacy but. i’m going to sob fr my aunt (religious in my childhood but the best out of my immediate family) messaged me apologizing for any harm she caused me as part of the mormon church and . people really are good at the core
2 notes
·
View notes
Making this public too but if anyone knows if anyone has any good tutorials on making objects into earrings can you send it my way? I had one saved from f/aaeish but since they deactivated I can’t use it
6 notes
·
View notes
oooo uou got a new icon,, what is that its very red
Is this
I made this procrastinating on a background. Happy spoopy month
2 notes
·
View notes
Listen to skyjacks also look at my cat
68K notes
·
View notes
i cant stop thinking about a post by @possamble so i made this
inspired by this
based on a fanart by BugsGay on twitter
45K notes
·
View notes