i hate when ppl choose to make fun of ant when he does silly goofy things with his family. Like those are his people, they helped raise him after bitchass cancer took both his grandma and his mama. He can dance with the antfam all he wants and wear silly matching pjs. He can shamelessly advertise his brother's newest rap single. That's his family
14 notes
·
View notes
I’m the friend of @elijah-doodle who said that worm was edible
Shish kebab The worm (Elijah wanted me to send this to you???)
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
16 notes
·
View notes
revelations 666.
'part ii: trick or treat?' + 'how to exorcise demons from your local priest'
9 notes
·
View notes
VLAD. ALONE.
he is hot and in your area please give him flour and 18000 sodas for enrichment
HOT SEXY AUSTRALIAN MAN
3 notes
·
View notes
Even when Sam leads the group of AU hunters, it’s just missing that cult-like devotion, you know? Sam would never and could never inspire that in-world.
8 notes
·
View notes
Zesty Take #46:
The idea that a gun will keep you safe from govt overreach is, at minimum, a useful tool to institute govt overreach.
When gun ownership is the standard of personal safety and success, it becomes a singular political focus. The primary question for each candidate becomes, "do they in any way threaten my guns?"
Threatening, in this context, has a very loose definition. Depending on the listener, it could be any action or inaction. The fear is both intense and nonspecific.
The rest of a "pro-2a" candidate's policies matter very little. If those policies include govt overreach or legalized abuse, that's ok. The idea that gun ownership protects them from the problems means that they will often vote against their own interests, as long as they feel secure wrt their firearms.
A militarized police force with qualified immunity - which is generally idealized by candidates who are "pro-2a" - eliminates any practical use of private firearms that could at one time have been used as protection against the govt. Legal owners protecting themselves from illegal search and seizure cut the same silhouette as an illegal owner trying to cause harm. Pulling that gun will only put you in the ground.
Increased sustainable hunting is a very valid approach to countering food deserts. However, a gun does nothing to improve infrastructure or education, or preserve social safety nets. You cannot compel an employer to stop committing labor offenses with a gun. You cannot bring a gun to a polling place and eliminate voter disenfranchisement. A gun will not increase accessibility, housing availability, wages, or access to healthcare. Statistics do not support the idea that guns reduce crime.
These are issues that have to be addressed in other ways. They are also issues that are overwhelmingly exacerbated or ignored by "pro-2a" candidates. These candidates succeed in maintaining poor conditions, or worsening them, by securing votes based on their "pro-2a" status.
Individuals who believe that guns are an ultimate protective device are incredibly vulnerable to this political manipulation. Regardless of the source of the idea, or the reason for holding it, it is easily weaponized. And it should be treated accordingly.
6 notes
·
View notes
Okay, picture this: Smol baby Dynal. Would he be fluffy? Or not fluffy when he was born?
Idk what popped in, I thought it would be a wholesome question or something ^^;
He was born with pale downy fluff and without any of his recognizable features! His horns and markings grew in over time.
4 notes
·
View notes
It’s interesting that when referring to Michael and Mikleo’s relationship, the words “血を分ける” is used instead of “血が繋がる”—both meaning basically the same thing (literally “to share blood” and “to be related by blood” but when you put it like this in English, they sound the same on the surface, they’re both usually translated as “blood-related” anyway), but the former is used to indicate anyone who’s directly and closely related (so parents, siblings, children, etc.) instead of the latter that is more general (including uncles, aunts, cousins, etc.) but still more limited than “血を引く” (an entire family lineage).
I don’t know what I’m getting at here but I’m just reminded of this by Mikleo wondering if Michael and Muse were husband and wife before Sorey said he thought they were siblings because they looked alike. Shepherds can’t get married when they’re a Shepherd (they can outside the pact though) after all. I mean there was that English mistranslation but that was a mistranslation lol.
4 notes
·
View notes
Your going to have a blast with Kingohger
1 note
·
View note