Tumgik
#Absolut Creation
lexotanmerlin · 1 month
Text
Lex # 5200
♥Hair: KUNI – Lisa (All Colors) ♥Head:  Absolut Creation *!* EVEolution V5.4HD Mesh head Marie ( the last version of EVEolution mesh Head with Hight definition option. There are 4 possibility to adjust any Skin BOM from any others brands created for others head. It is compatible with applier or BOM based on SL UV. Whatch here) by Ginger Chevalier ♥Body: eBODY – REBORN – by eBODY ♥Skin: Absolut…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
newattitude · 4 months
Video
Absolut Creation - GALVANIZED. - Limited Addiction par ✰ ​​​​​​​​Pтιтɴoυrѕ Alтer ✰ Via Flickr : ✰ Credit ✰ 
 For Her 
Limited Addiction - Sexy Pink
 For Him 
  GALVANIZED - Menes Top - MAN CAVE Event 
  GALVANIZED - Menes Shorts - MAN CAVE Event 
 Decor & Pose : Absolut Creation - Sand castle of Hector 
 NEW ATTITUDE ● New Attitude Blog ● Twitter ● Tumblr ● Pinterest ● Instagram ● Flickr ● Facebook ● Deviants Art
0 notes
aethersea · 3 months
Text
another thing fantasy writers should keep track of is how much of their worldbuilding is aesthetic-based. it's not unlike the sci-fi hardness scale, which measures how closely a story holds to known, real principles of science. The Martian is extremely hard sci-fi, with nearly every detail being grounded in realistic fact as we know it; Star Trek is extremely soft sci-fi, with a vaguely plausible "space travel and no resource scarcity" premise used as a foundation for the wildest ideas the writers' room could come up with. and much as Star Trek fuckin rules, there's nothing wrong with aesthetic-based fantasy worldbuilding!
(sidenote we're not calling this 'soft fantasy' bc there's already a hard/soft divide in fantasy: hard magic follows consistent rules, like "earthbenders can always and only bend earth", and soft magic follows vague rules that often just ~feel right~, like the Force. this frankly kinda maps, but I'm not talking about just the magic, I'm talking about the worldbuilding as a whole.
actually for the purposes of this post we're calling it grounded vs airy fantasy, bc that's succinct and sounds cool.)
a great example of grounded fantasy is Dungeon Meshi: the dungeon ecosystem is meticulously thought out, the plot is driven by the very realistic need to eat well while adventuring, the story touches on both social and psychological effects of the whole 'no one dies forever down here' situation, the list goes on. the worldbuilding wants to be engaged with on a mechanical level and it rewards that engagement.
deliberately airy fantasy is less common, because in a funny way it's much harder to do. people tend to like explanations. it takes skill to pull off "the world is this way because I said so." Narnia manages: these kids fall into a magic world through the back of a wardrobe, befriend talking beavers who drink tea, get weapons from Santa Claus, dance with Bacchus and his maenads, and sail to the edge of the world, without ever breaking suspension of disbelief. it works because every new thing that happens fits the vibes. it's all just vibes! engaging with the worldbuilding on a mechanical level wouldn't just be futile, it'd be missing the point entirely.
the reason I started off calling this aesthetic-based is that an airy story will usually lean hard on an existing aesthetic, ideally one that's widely known by the target audience. Lewis was drawing on fables, fairy tales, myths, children's stories, and the vague idea of ~medieval europe~ that is to this day our most generic fantasy setting. when a prince falls in love with a fallen star, when there are giants who welcome lost children warmly and fatten them up for the feast, it all fits because these are things we'd expect to find in this story. none of this jars against what we've already seen.
and the point of it is to be wondrous and whimsical, to set the tone for the story Lewis wants to tell. and it does a great job! the airy worldbuilding serves the purposes of the story, and it's no less elegant than Ryōko Kui's elaborately grounded dungeon. neither kind of worldbuilding is better than the other.
however.
you do have to know which one you're doing.
the whole reason I'm writing this is that I saw yet another long, entertaining post dragging GRRM for absolute filth. asoiaf is a fun one because on some axes it's pretty grounded (political fuck-around-and-find-out, rumors spread farther than fact, fastest way to lose a war is to let your people starve, etc), but on others it's entirely airy (some people have magic Just Cause, the various peoples are each based on an aesthetic/stereotype/cliché with no real thought to how they influence each other as neighbors, the super-long seasons have no effect on ecology, etc).
and again! none of this is actually bad! (well ok some of those stereotypes are quite bigoted. but other than that this isn't bad.) there's nothing wrong with the season thing being there to highlight how the nobles are focused on short-sighted wars for power instead of storing up resources for the extremely dangerous and inevitable winter, that's a nice allegory, and the looming threat of many harsh years set the narrative tone. and you can always mix and match airy and grounded worldbuilding – everyone does it, frankly it's a necessity, because sooner or later the answer to every worldbuilding question is "because the author wanted it to be that way." the only completely grounded writing is nonfiction.
the problem is when you pretend that your entirely airy worldbuilding is actually super duper grounded. like, for instance, claiming that your vibes-based depiction of Medieval Europe (Gritty Edition) is completely historical, and then never even showing anyone spinning. or sniffing dismissively at Tolkien for not detailing Aragorn's tax policy, and then never addressing how a pre-industrial grain-based agricultural society is going years without harvesting any crops. (stored grain goes bad! you can't even mouse-proof your silos, how are you going to deal with mold?) and the list goes on.
the man went up on national television and invited us to engage with his worldbuilding mechanically, and then if you actually do that, it shatters like spun sugar under the pressure. doesn't he realize that's not the part of the story that's load-bearing! he should've directed our focus to the political machinations and extensive trope deconstruction, not the handwavey bit.
point is, as a fantasy writer there will always be some amount of your worldbuilding that boils down to 'because I said so,' and there's nothing wrong with that. nor is there anything wrong with making that your whole thing – airy worldbuilding can be beautiful and inspiring. but you have to be aware of what you're doing, because if you ask your readers to engage with the worldbuilding in gritty mechanical detail, you had better have some actual mechanics to show them.
4K notes · View notes
clarkgriffon · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER 6x12 | “Doublemeat Palace” 
608 notes · View notes
buggachat · 11 months
Text
imagine, say, Bunnyx went back to Origins Season 1 and pulled Gabriel aside as he was considering picking up the Hawkmoth mantle and showed him, "Look, Gabriel. If you continue on this path, you WILL succeed in getting the Ladybug and Black Cat miraculous. You WILL make a wish. But getting there will tear you apart. You will lose what humanity you have, you will literally rot away from the inside, spend the last months of your life in agonizing pain, Nathalie and Adrien (the only two people in your life you can even pretend to care about) will spit on your name and Nathalie will grow to despise you so much she will attempt to kill you. And your wish? It will NEVER bring Emilie back. You won't even be able to bring yourself to do it, because you'll realize that you've become everything that she hated and never wanted you to be. Emilie WILL STAY DEAD, and in the end, all you will be able to wish for is an end to your now-miserable life. All this gamble will win you is your grave."
idk I just don't think Gabriel's response to that would be "oh yay! I win!"
2K notes · View notes
void-and-virtue · 6 months
Text
Lying on the floor in a puddle of my tears and staring blankly at the ceiling as I once again think about all the fucked up, multi-dimensional ways that Kim Dokja, Yoo Joonghyuk and Han Sooyoung encompass the god vs creation and deity vs worshipper dynamics
527 notes · View notes
mobius-m-mobius · 14 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
falling in love with a god is not a death sentence. the story is only a tragedy if the god loves you back. - nathaniel orion g. k.
355 notes · View notes
voldkat · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
if you were in my shoes , you'd walk the same damn miles i do
319 notes · View notes
gentlebeard · 7 months
Text
If I could hold you for a minute, Darling, I’d go through it again
For @edsbacktattoo & @stedesearring 💕 Show: Our Flag Means Death - Season 1 & 2 Music: Francesca by Hozier YouTube
420 notes · View notes
montanabohemian · 1 year
Text
honestly, the people bitching about an objectively insane episode of wwdits are SO BORING. it's just a silly little comedy about some idiot vampires that live together and commit atrocities in new york. like what is so difficult to comprehend about that.
of course lazslo would create horrifying animal lab experiments that can talk that guillermo has to take care of.
of course nandor and colin are besties.
of course nadja makes 50 dunkin runs for a crazy lady.
it's just a weird show that is outrageous and funny and sometimes carries an emotional wallop. it's not fucking rocket science.
1K notes · View notes
Text
Currently brainrotting over the idea of Mobei-jun as Hades and Shang Qinghua as Persephone. That is all.
255 notes · View notes
demadogs · 1 month
Text
some of you need to hate ai way more than you currently do
173 notes · View notes
mikaikaika · 1 year
Text
Get you a media which not only provides you with gay sex but also is an indie psychological horror series
2K notes · View notes
buggachat · 1 year
Text
lovesquare keeping secrets from each other conflict PART TWO LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOO
1K notes · View notes
queenlucythevaliant · 2 months
Text
Pauline? Pauliiiine?
Tumblr media
Why does Drinian have a globe? 🌍
Tumblr media
Isn't Narnia canonically flat? 🗺️
Tumblr media
Isn't that definitively established in This Very Book? 🤔
(Round Narnia conspiracy theory when?)
172 notes · View notes
patriamrealm · 1 year
Note
The Fraction Legendaries are just too cute, I'm dead. Especially Dialga. Its giving me goofy golden retriever vibes.
But my question is would they make the sad puppy eyes at Adamant/Irida/Volo after being told that the Yummy People Food in their hands Not For Pokemon?
Cause I can't help but seeing them do that.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The biggest mistake they all made was giving them normal human food.
649 notes · View notes